REU Final Presentation

Similar documents
Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro

Gravitational Lensing. A Brief History, Theory, and Applications

Observational and modeling techniques in microlensing planet searches

ASTRON 331 Astrophysics TEST 1 May 5, This is a closed-book test. No notes, books, or calculators allowed.

Gravitational lensing: one of the sharpest tools in an astronomers toolbox. James Binney Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics

Searching for extrasolar planets using microlensing

Observational Cosmology

Gravitational Lensing. Einstein deflection angle Lens equation, magnification Galaxy lenses Cluster lenses Weak lensing Time delays in lenses

ASTR 200 : Lecture 26. Gravitational Lensing

Gravitational Lensing by Reissner-Nordstrom Extremal Black Hole

Conceptual Themes for the 2017 Sagan Summer Workshop

(x 2 + ξ 2 ) The integral in (21.02) is analytic, and works out to 2/ξ 2. So. v = 2GM ξc

Fig 2. Light curves resulting from the source trajectories in the maps of Fig. 1.

2. Geometry of lens systems

RESOLVING HIGH ENERGY UNIVERSE USING STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING. Anna Barnacka Einstein Fellow at Harvard

Detecting Planets via Gravitational Microlensing

Introduction to (Strong) Gravitational Lensing: Basics and History. Joachim Wambsganss Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg (ZAH/ARI)

Gravitational microlensing: an original technique to detect exoplanets

Scott Gaudi The Ohio State University. Results from Microlensing Searches for Planets.

Extragalactic Microlensing: Quasars, Caustics & Dark Matter

Lensing by (the most) massive structures in the universe

Microlensing Planets (and Beyond) In the Era of Large Surveys Andy Gould (OSU)

Gravitational Lensing

Microlensing Parallax with Spitzer

Outline: Galaxy groups & clusters

The Gravitational Microlensing Planet Search Technique from Space

Observations of extrasolar planets

Black Hole and Host Galaxy Mass Estimates

How can Mathematics Reveal Dark Matter?

Lensing Basics: III. Basic Theory (continued)

Black Holes. Jan Gutowski. King s College London

Exoplanet Microlensing Surveys with WFIRST and Euclid. David Bennett University of Notre Dame

Extragalactic DM Halos and QSO Properties Through Microlensing

Charles Keeton. Principles of Astrophysics. Using Gravity and Stellar Physics. to Explore the Cosmos. ^ Springer

Microlensing Planets: A Controlled Scientific Experiment From Absolute Chaos Andy Gould (OSU)

Microlensing by Multiple Planets in High Magnification Events

Gravitational microlensing and its capabilities for research of the dark matter. Lyudmila Berdina Institute of Radio Astronomy NAS of Ukraine

Ground Based Gravitational Microlensing Searches for Extra-Solar Terrestrial Planets Sun Hong Rhie & David Bennett (University of Notre Dame)

We investigate the flux ratio anomalies between

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 9 Aug 2001

PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL LENSING. The precursors of XVIII et XIX centuries. 2 G M r. v e

Interactive Visualization of Gravitational Lenses

AST1100 Lecture Notes

The Wellington microlensing modelling programme

Exploring Dark Matter through Gravitational Lensing. Exploring the Dark Universe Indiana University June 2007

Subaru Telescope adaptive optics observations of gravitationally lensed quasars

Copyright 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley.

Binary Lenses in OGLE-III EWS Database. Season 2004

Microlensing (planet detection): theory and applications

Simple Point Lens 3 Features. & 3 Parameters. t_0 Height of Peak. Time of Peak. u_0 Width of Peak. t_e

BROAD SPECTRAL LINE AND CONTINUUM VARIABILITIES IN QSO SPECTRA INDUCED BY MICROLENSING:METHODS OF COMPUTATION

BASICS OF GRAVITATIONAL LENSING

A CHARACTERISTIC PLANETARY FEATURE IN DOUBLE-PEAKED, HIGH-MAGNIFICATION MICROLENSING EVENTS

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 31 Jan 2018

The phenomenon of gravitational lenses

HOMEWORK 10. Applications: special relativity, Newtonian limit, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, cosmology, 1 black holes

General Relativity. In GR, mass (or energy) warps the spacetime fabric of space.

The Galactic Exoplanet Survey Telescope (GEST)

The Cult of Microlensing B. Scott Gaudi Institute for Advanced Study

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE QUASAR BRIGHTNESS PROFILE FROM OBSERVATIONS OF HIGH MAGNIFICATION EVENTS. Ekaterina Koptelova, Elena Shimanovskaya

Single Lens Lightcurve Modeling

NOT ENOUGH MACHOS IN THE GALACTIC HALO. Éric AUBOURG EROS, CEA-Saclay

Is there a magnification paradox in gravitational lensing?

Microlensing Constraints on Quasar X-ray Emission Regions

Searching for Other Worlds: The Methods

Modeling Quasar Microlensing

Scott Gaudi The Ohio State University Sagan Summer Workshop August 9, 2017

Seeing The Universe Through A Gravitational Lens

Dark Matter. Homework 3 due. ASTR 433 Projects 4/17: distribute abstracts 4/19: 20 minute talks. 4/24: Homework 4 due 4/26: Exam ASTR 333/433.

A = 6561 times greater. B. 81 times greater. C. equally strong. D. 1/81 as great. E. (1/81) 2 = 1/6561 as great Pearson Education, Inc.

Brief update (3 mins/2 slides) on astrophysics behind final project

DARK MATTER IN UNIVERSE. edited by. John Bahcall Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, USA. Tsvi Piran The Hebrew University, Israel

Gravitational Lensing

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 18 Aug 2007

Centers of Galaxies. = Black Holes and Quasars

Project Observations and Analysis in 2016 and Beyond

HubVis: Software for Gravitational Lens Estimation and Visualization from Hubble Data

( ) 2 1 r S. ( dr) 2 r 2 dφ

Gravitational Efects and the Motion of Stars

Test #3 Next Tuesday, Nov. 8 Bring your UNM ID! Bring two number 2 pencils. Announcements. Review for test on Monday, Nov 7 at 3:25pm

There are 4 x stars in the Galaxy

Gravitational microlensing. Exoplanets Microlensing and Transit methods

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 5 Apr 1996

Ultra high magnification microlensing

Evidence for/constraints on dark matter in galaxies and clusters

Special Relativity: The laws of physics must be the same in all inertial reference frames.

Clusters, lensing and CFHT reprocessing

Writing very large numbers

ASTRONOMY QUIZ NUMBER 1

16th Microlensing Season of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment

a. 0.5 AU b. 5 AU c. 50 AU d.* AU e AU

Dynamics of Astrophysical Discs

L2 point vs. geosynchronous orbit for parallax effect by simulations

Dark Matter. Galaxy Counts Redshift Surveys Galaxy Rotation Curves Cluster Dynamics Gravitational Lenses ~ 0.3 Ω M Ω b.

The Sun s center is much hotter than the surface. The Sun looks large and bright in the sky. Other stars look much smaller.

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Jul 2003

Gravitational lensing (V) 3/6/2009. se priver du reste. Choisir, c est. André Gide 3/6/ Nice (Lab. Fizeau), J. Surdej 1

Gravitational Microlensing Observations. Grant Christie

Gravitational Lensing and Observational Cosmology. Umetsu, Keiichi ( 梅津敬一 )

Investigating the free-floating planet mass by Euclid observations

Transcription:

July 28, 2009

Outline 1 History Historical Background

Outline 1 History Historical Background 2 to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations

Outline 1 History Historical Background 2 to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations 3

Outline 1 History Historical Background 2 to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations 3 4 Concluding remarks

Historical Background History Historical Background 1919: Verification of Einstein s prediction of 1.74 deviation of grazing light rays by the sun.

Historical Background Historical Background 1919: Verification of Einstein s prediction of 1.74 deviation of grazing light rays by the sun. 1936: Einstein publishes a paper: Lens-like action of a star by the deviation of light in the gravitational field

Historical Background Historical Background 1919: Verification of Einstein s prediction of 1.74 deviation of grazing light rays by the sun. 1936: Einstein publishes a paper: Lens-like action of a star by the deviation of light in the gravitational field Theoretical studies and observational ideas

Historical Background Historical Background 1919: Verification of Einstein s prediction of 1.74 deviation of grazing light rays by the sun. 1936: Einstein publishes a paper: Lens-like action of a star by the deviation of light in the gravitational field Theoretical studies and observational ideas 1979: Walsh, Carswell, and Weymann observe the fist case of gravitational lensing - a quasar source lensed by a galaxy

Historical Background Historical Background 1919: Verification of Einstein s prediction of 1.74 deviation of grazing light rays by the sun. 1936: Einstein publishes a paper: Lens-like action of a star by the deviation of light in the gravitational field Theoretical studies and observational ideas 1979: Walsh, Carswell, and Weymann observe the fist case of gravitational lensing - a quasar source lensed by a galaxy Figure: First multiply imaged quasar Q0957+561 identified as a gravitationally lensed system.

Project Goals History to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations Some of the project goals: Understand gravitational lensing

Project Goals History to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations Some of the project goals: Understand gravitational lensing write tools for calculating and visualizing some gravitational lensing systems images of point and extended sources critical curves and caustics lightcurves

to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations Project Goals Some of the project goals: Understand gravitational lensing write tools for calculating and visualizing some gravitational lensing systems images of point and extended sources critical curves and caustics lightcurves write tools for the ray-shooting method

to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations Lensing Diagram I O S θ I θs α L S L Lens Plane Source P lane The Len s equation θ = θ S + D LS D OS α( θ)

to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations Definitions and Approximations O θi S L Lens Plane The Len s equation θ = θ S + D LS D OS α( θ) θs α S L I Source Plane Thin lens approximation Small angle approximation Works for most practical purposes Distances are angular diameter distances

The deflection angle History to the project Theory: Deflection angle, lensing diagram, and equations For point mass M, light ray grazing at a distance R from the mass, Newtonian Calculation General Relativity α = 2GM c 2 1 R α = 4GM c 2 1 R

The simplest case History Point-mass lens of mass M

The simplest case Point-mass lens of mass M Lens equation: θ = θ S + D LS D OS 4GM D OL θ

The simplest case History Point-mass lens of mass M Lens equation: θ = θ S + D LS D OS 4GM D OL θ Two images: θ ± = 1 ( ) θ S ± θs 2 2 + 4θ2 E

The simplest case History Point-mass lens of mass M Lens equation: 1 θ = θ S + D LS D OS 4GM D OL θ Two images: θ ± = 1 ( ) θ S ± θs 2 2 + 4θ2 E y (in units of D OS θ E ) 0.5 0 0.5 Source disc Distorted images (arcs) 1 Einstein ring θ S = 0 = the image is a ring Magnification 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 x (in units of D OS θ E )

Magnification History Images are distorted and hence project different solid angle to our telescopes

Magnification Images are distorted and hence project different solid angle to our telescopes Unresolved images (Microlensing)

Magnification Images are distorted and hence project different solid angle to our telescopes Unresolved images (Microlensing) Total magnification as a function of time gives a typical lightcurve

Magnification Images are distorted and hence project different solid angle to our telescopes Unresolved images (Microlensing) Total magnification as a function of time gives a typical lightcurve

Star-planet type systems History A small mass (planet) near a larger mass (star)

Star-planet type systems A small mass (planet) near a larger mass (star) Expressions for α, lens equation, magnification get a bit more complicated.

Star-planet type systems History A small mass (planet) near a larger mass (star) Expressions for α, lens equation, magnification get a bit more complicated. Lightcurves are no more symmetric but show planetary perturbations The region where mag is (theoretically) is no more a point in the source plane = more interesting caustic formations (next slide) Total magnification(µ) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 x s ( in units of D OL θ E ) 10 7 4 0.2 Planetary perturbation (magnified above)

Image formation and caustics in planet-star type lensing Critical curve and image positions 0.2 Caustic and source positions y (in units of D OL θ E ) 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 Critical curve y (in units of D OS θ E ) 0.1 0 0.1 Point source outside caustic (3 images) Point source inside caustic (5 images) Caustic 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 x (in units of D OL θ E ) 0.2 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 x (in units of D OS θ E )

Example of planets detection OGLE-2006 BLG-109Lb,c A system similar to Jupiter / Saturn orbiting Sun about 5000 lys away

Ray-shooting History Standard method in use to generate magnification map for a lensing system

Ray-shooting History Standard method in use to generate magnification map for a lensing system Method: Populate a region of the image plane with large amount of photons (i.e. create a grid)

Ray-shooting History Standard method in use to generate magnification map for a lensing system Method: Populate a region of the image plane with large amount of photons (i.e. create a grid) calculate the mapping from the image plane to the source plane θ S = θ D OL D OS α( θ)

Ray-shooting History Standard method in use to generate magnification map for a lensing system Method: Populate a region of the image plane with large amount of photons (i.e. create a grid) calculate the mapping from the image plane to the source plane θ S = θ D OL D OS α( θ) the density of mapping is proportional to the magnification

Ray-shooting Standard method in use to generate magnification map for a lensing system Method: Populate a region of the image plane with large amount of photons (i.e. create a grid) calculate the mapping from the image plane to the source plane θ S = θ D OL D OS α( θ) the density of mapping is proportional to the magnification Wrote a C code to implement this basic idea

Ray-shooting example History 0.2 y (in units of D OS θ E ) 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 x (in units of D OS θ E )

Other models The ones already discussed are point mass models. There are other lensing models listed below, the ones that were studied during the project and codes written to calculate and visualize the models are in bold face. Singular isothermal sphere (SIS) Non-singular isothermal sphere (NSIS) Uniform sheet Elliptical potential (both singular/non-singular) Isothermal ellipsoids

Concluding remarks Finally.. My basic references: Gravitational Lensing : Schneider et.al. Singularity theory and gravitational lensing: Petters et al. Many papers on (arxiv, A&A, Phys Rev et.al) Acknowledgements KSU REU Program Dr. Weaver: I learned a lot during the summer Everyone! Questions??