Terramechanics V MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Terramechanics V. ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Similar documents
Terramechanics MARYLAND. Overview of wheel-soil interactions Sources of rolling resistance on soil Rover propulsion analysis U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Terramechanics. Origin and nature of lunar soil Soil mechanics Wheel-soil interactions Tandem wheel calculations Grousers MARYLAND

Terramechanics. Origin and nature of lunar soil Soil mechanics Rigid wheel mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Terramechanics. Origin and nature of lunar soil Soil mechanics Rigid wheel mechanics MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F.

Surface Interaction Modeling Engineering Methods. Karl Iagnemma, Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Modeling of Flexible and Rigid Wheels for Exploration Rover on Rough Terrain

Predicting the performances of rigid rover wheels on extraterrestrial surfaces based on test results obtained on earth

3D Simulation and Validation of RCL-E and MER Rover Types Mobility

Terramechanics 2. Soil bearing parameters Bulldozing Tandem wheels MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F

Terramechanics Based Analysis and Motion Control of Rovers on Simulated Lunar Soil

THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF A RIGID WHEEL ON LUNAR REGOLITH SIMULANT

The Mechanics of Tractor - Implement Performance

SOIL MECHANICS OF LUNAR REGOLITH SIMULANTS FOR PROBE LANDING AND ROVER LOCOMOTION

A NEW MULTI-BODY DYNAMIC MODEL FOR SEAFLOOR MINER AND ITS TRAFFICABILITY EVALUATION

A predictive Wheel-Soil Interaction Model for Planetary Rovers validated in Testbeds and against MER performance data

Experimental Device for Measuring Sandy Soil Sinkage Parameters

Using the Soft-Soil tire model

Application of a Dynamic Pressure-Sinkage Relationship for Lightweight Mobile Robots

Overview. Dry Friction Wedges Flatbelts Screws Bearings Rolling Resistance

Vehicle Dynamics CEE 320. Winter 2006 CEE 320 Steve Muench

SOLUTION 8 7. To hold lever: a+ M O = 0; F B (0.15) - 5 = 0; F B = N. Require = N N B = N 0.3. Lever,

Autonomous terrain parameter estimation for wheeled vehicles

Influence of Atmosphere on Lunar Rover Performance Analysis based on Soil Parameter Identification

COMPARISON OF DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD AND TRADITIONAL MODELING METHODS FOR STEADY-STATE WHEEL-TERRAIN INTERACTION OF SMALL VEHICLES

Journal of Field Robotics

A Volumetric Contact Model for Space Robot and Planetary Rover Application

KEYWORDS: Wheel terrain interaction; Wheel soil interface; Terramechanics; Off-road mobile robots; Multibody system.

Slip-Based Traction Control of a Planetary Rover

THE TRACTIVE PERFORMANCE OF A FRICTION-BASED PROTOTYPE TRACK

Engineering Mechanics. Friction in Action

Objectives. In this section you will learn the following. Rankine s theory. Coulomb s theory. Method of horizontal slices given by Wang (2000)

Simple Car Dynamics. Outline. Claude Lacoursière HPC2N/VRlab, Umeå Universitet, Sweden, May 18, 2005

PHYS 1114, Lecture 33, April 10 Contents:

STATICS. Friction VECTOR MECHANICS FOR ENGINEERS: Eighth Edition CHAPTER. Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr.

Simulating Track/Sprocket and Track/Wheel/Terrain Contact in Tracked Vehicles

Physics 141 Rotational Motion 2 Page 1. Rotational Motion 2

First-Year Engineering Program. Physics RC Reading Module

Slip, Traction Control, and Navigation of a Lunar Rover

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN GE MECHANICS III FINAL EXAM APRIL 18, 2011 Professor A. Dolovich A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION TIME: 3 HOURS

Chapter 8: Momentum, Impulse, & Collisions. Newton s second law in terms of momentum:

16.07 Dynamics Final Exam

Dynamics ( 동역학 ) Ch.3 Kinetic of Particles (3.1)

The single track model

Physics. Assignment-1(UNITS AND MEASUREMENT)

SOLUTION di x = y2 dm. rdv. m = a 2 bdx. = 2 3 rpab2. I x = 1 2 rp L0. b 4 a1 - x2 a 2 b. = 4 15 rpab4. Thus, I x = 2 5 mb2. Ans.

The magnitude of this force is a scalar quantity called weight.

Physics 111: Mechanics Lecture 5

Physics 12. Unit 5 Circular Motion and Gravitation Part 1

Mobility Prediction of Multi-Body Vehicle Dynamics Handling Simulations on Deformable Terrain. By Justin C. Madsen

Lecture 6 mechanical system modeling equivalent mass gears

Scalability of Classical Terramechanics Models for Lightweight Vehicle Applications

Homework Assignment 4 Root Finding Algorithms The Maximum Velocity of a Car Due: Friday, February 19, 2010 at 12noon

Physics 101: Lecture 15 Torque, F=ma for rotation, and Equilibrium

Displacement charts for slopes subjected to seismic loads

Dynamic equilibrium: object moves with constant velocity in a straight line. = 0, a x = i

Rishad A. Irani, Robert J. Bauer & Andrew Warkentin

Rotational Kinematics

Problem 1 Problem 2 Problem 3 Problem 4 Total

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

10 Paper discussion + terradynamics 4/25/2018

Physics 121, Final Exam Do not turn the pages of the exam until you are instructed to do so.

(i) JUL 3. June May 10, Certified by: Dr. Karl Iagnemma Principle Research Scientist, LMP Thesis Supervisor

PHYS 111 HOMEWORK #11

Control of Mobile Robots Prof. Luca Bascetta

PHYSICS 221, FALL 2011 EXAM #2 SOLUTIONS WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2011

(b) The period T and the angular frequency ω of uniform rotation are related to the cyclic frequency f as. , ω = 2πf =

Physics 53 Exam 3 November 3, 2010 Dr. Alward

Analysis of Shear Bands in Sand Under Reduced Gravity Conditions

Trajectory Planning of Planar Tracked Vehicles

Lecture 10. Example: Friction and Motion

Lecture 7. Forces. Important note: First Exam is next Tuesday, Feb. 6, 8:15-9:45 pm (see link on Canvas for locations)

Assignment 9. to roll without slipping, how large must F be? Ans: F = R d mgsinθ.

Chapter 12. Static Equilibrium and Elasticity

. d. v A v B. e. none of these.

CHAPTER 12 STATIC EQUILIBRIUM AND ELASTICITY. Conditions for static equilibrium Center of gravity (weight) Examples of static equilibrium

Physics 351, Spring 2017, Homework #2. Due at start of class, Friday, January 27, 2017

Lecture 13 REVIEW. Physics 106 Spring What should we know? What should we know? Newton s Laws

PHY131 Summer 2011 Class 5 Notes

Chapter 8. Centripetal Force and The Law of Gravity

CEE 271: Applied Mechanics II, Dynamics Lecture 25: Ch.17, Sec.4-5

Closed-form Method to Evaluate Bike Braking Performance

Phys101 Second Major-152 Zero Version Coordinator: Dr. W. Basheer Monday, March 07, 2016 Page: 1

Physics 201 Exam 3 (Monday, November 5) Fall 2012 (Saslow)

4.4. Friction and Inclines

Torque and Rotation Lecture 7

Physics 201 Lecture 16

Exam I, Physics 117-Spring 2003, Mon. 3/10/2003

Physics 1 Second Midterm Exam (AM) 2/25/2010

Chapter 6 Dynamics I: Motion Along a Line

Basic ground vehicle dynamics 1. Prof. R.G. Longoria Spring 2015

EQUATIONS OF MOTION: GENERAL PLANE MOTION (Section 17.5) Today s Objectives: Students will be able to analyze the planar kinetics of a rigid body

Physics 2211 ABC Quiz #3 Solutions Spring 2017

7.6 Journal Bearings

Name: M1 - Dynamics. Date: Time: Total marks available: Total marks achieved:

P211 Spring 2004 Form A

ω avg [between t 1 and t 2 ] = ω(t 1) + ω(t 2 ) 2

PHYSICS 218 EXAM 2 Tuesday, October 26, 2010

PORTMORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Chapter 4 Dynamics: Newton s Laws of Motion

A PHYSICS 201 Final Exam

Transcription:

Terramechanics V Note - I haven t posted the slides from Tuesday because there were a number of typos (and outright mistakes) that were (almost) all corrected on Thursday. This set of slides are the corrected slides from both Tuesday and Thursday in the appropriate order to make a full set of slides on terramechanics. I know this is late (and I apologize for that), so if you would like extra time on the problem set, take it with no penalty. I d rather you understand and do it right than worry about grades at this point. U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 1 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

LRV Three-View and Dimensions U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 2 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Location of LRV Center of Gravity U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 3 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Rover Climbing/Descending Slope ` h T 2 N 2 mg a T 1 r N 1 h a ` r T 1 N 1 mg T 2 N 2 U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 4 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Static Equilibrium Conditions X Forces? to surface X Forces k to surface N 1 + N 2 = mg cos T 1 + T 2 = mg sin X Torques about rear axle T 1 r + T 2 r + N 1` = mg [(` a) cos h sin ] Friction forces proportional to force into surface U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND T 1 = T 2 N 1 N 2 Four equations, four unknowns 5 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Static Equilibrium Solutions apple a h N 1 = mg 1 cos ` ` + r` sin apple a h N 2 = mg ` cos + ` + r` sin T 2 = T 1 = N 2 N 1 + N 2 mg sin N 1 N 1 + N 2 mg sin U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 6 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Loaded LRV Weight Distribution r N 1 a h ` N T 2 1 mg T 2 m = 690 kg mg = 1120 N ` = 228.6 cm r = 40.6 cm a = 114.3 cm U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 7 h = 50.8 cm N 1 = N 2 = 279.8 N b = 22.9 cm Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Normal and Shear Wheel Force w/slope 0.9" 0.8" 0.7" 0.6" 0.5" 0.4" 0.3" 0.2" 0.1" 0" N 1 mg N 2 mg 0" 10" 20" 30" 40" 50" 60" N1" N2" T1" T2" T 2 mg N 2 mg U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 8 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Longitudinal Dynamic Conditions X Forces? to surface X Forces k to surface N 1 + N 2 = mg cos T 1 + T 2 = mg sin + ma x X Torques about rear axle T 1 r + T 2 r + N 1` = mg [(` a) cos h sin ] Friction forces proportional to force into surface U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND T 1 = T 2 N 1 N 2 Four equations, four unknowns 9 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Longitudinal Dynamic Solutions N 1 = mg apple 1 N 2 = mg a ` cos apple a ` cos + h ` + r` sin h ` + r` sin + a x g a x g T 2 = T 1 = N 2 N 1 + N 2 (mg sin + ma x ) N 1 N 1 + N 2 (mg sin + ma x ) U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 10 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Overturn Limits 1 a ` cos limit h` + r` sin limit = a x g 1 For the static case (a x = 0) a h cos limit = ` ` + r` sin limit U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND tan limit = 1 a ` h ` + r` 11 = ` a h + r Limiting accel on flat ground a x,limit = g 1 a ` Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Limiting Slope Under Acceleration Maximum'Slope'(deg)' 60" 50" 40" 30" 20" 10" 0" limit 0" 0.1" 0.2" 0.3" 0.4" 0.5" 0.6" Accelera4on' a x g U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 12 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Compression Resistance (Lunar Soil) R c = 1 n + 1 (k c + bk ) 1 2n+1 n = 1 3W w (3 n) d 2(n+1) 2n+1 k c =0.14 N/cm 2 k =0.827 N/cm 3 R c = 1 2 (k c + bk ) 1 3 3W w 2 d 4 3 R c = 20.89 N/wheel = 83.57 N (total) U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 13 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Lunar Regolith Soil Properties Symbol Description Value Used in n Exponent of sinkage 1.0 EVERYTHING k Cohesive modulus of soil deformation 1400 N/m Rc, Rb, H k Frictional modulus of soil deformation 820,000 N/m Rc, Rb, H θ Slope angle Rg Cf Coefficient of friction 0.05 Rr γ Soil density 1.6 g/cm Rb Co Cohesive strength of soil 0.017 N/cm H ф Angle of internal friction 30-40 degrees Rb K Coefficient of soil Slip 1.8 cm H s slip 0.02 0.05 H U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 14 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Equations for Compression Resistance z = U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND apple 3W w (3 n)bk p d W w = weight on wheel d = wheel diameter bk R c = n + 1 z n+1 R c = compression resistance (per wheel) 15 2 2n+1 Correction - Page 25 of L03 (Corrected 141117) Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

LRV Sinkage in Lunar Regolith z = " 3W w 2(k c + bk ) p d z =1.812 cm # 2 3 Back wheel is a tandem wheel W w = 2 3 (k c + bk ) p dz 2 3 U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 16 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Tandem Wheels, n=1 N i = 2 3 (k c + bk ) p d p z i z i 1 (2z i z i 1 ) We already calculated z 1 =1.812 cm N 2 = 2 3 (k c + bk ) p d p z 2 z 1 (2z 2 z 1 Solve for z 2 (numerically would be easiest) z 2 =2.443 cm This is the total depth for wheel 2 U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 17 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Compaction Resistance, n=1 R c = 1 2 (k c + bk )z 2 R c = 56.92 N (per side) =) R c = 113.8 N U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 18 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Or, You Could Cheat Approximation formulas for n=1 Two wheels in tandem R c = 1.7 2 (k c + bk )z 2 Three wheels in tandem R c = 2.3 2 (k c + bk )z 2 z is the sinkage depth of the front wheel in both cases R g, R f are straightforward U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 19 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Bulldozing Resistance General case: R b = b sin ( + ) 2sin cos 2zcK c + z 2 K +`3o 3 2 All angles in radians! + c`2o apple 1 + tan 4 + 2 For tracked vehicles, only the first term applies: R b = U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND `o = z tan 2 4 2 `o soil disruption depth, and is not the same as contact length ` b sin ( + ) 2sin cos 20 2zcK c + z 2 K Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Bulldozing Resistance (Rb) Symbol Description Value Angle of internal friction γ Soil density 1.6 gm 0.002595 N/cm Co Cohesive strength of soil 0.017 Lo (degrees) Kc (degrees) K (degrees) Distance of rupture Modulus of cohesion of soil deformation Modulus of density of soil deformation 30-40 degrees for Lunar Regolith Nc (radians) Coefficient of passive earth pressure α (degrees) U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Angle of approach of the wheel 21 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Bulldozing Example (1) = cos 1 1 2z d = 33 o =0.576 rad = cos 1 1 `o = z 1 tan 2 2 4 2(1.812) 81.2 = 17.18 o =0.2999 rad =0.5341 N q = U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND e(1.5 )tan 2 cos 2 4 + 2 N c = N q 1 tan 22 = 32.23 = 48.09 Corrected 141123 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Bulldozing Example (2) N = 2(N q + 1) tan 1+0.4sin4 = 33.27 K c =(N c tan ) cos 2 = 33.37 2N K = tan +1 cos 2 = 72.77 ` = d 1 2 cos 1 2z = 12.18 cm d =0.002595 N cm 3 ; c o =0.017 N cm 2 U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 23 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Terzhagi Parameters Red lines represent values calculated for this example U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 24 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Bulldozing Example (3) R b = b sin ( + ) 2sin cos R b i = cm cm 2zcK c + +`3o N cm 2 + 3 z 2 K 2 N cm 3 cm2 + c`2o apple 1 + tan 4 + 2 + cm 3 N cm 3 + N cm 2 cm2 R b = 94.98 + 0.000131 + 0.014 = 95.00 N per leading wheel R b,total = 190.0 N U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 25 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Tractive Force per Wheel (No Grousers) H =[AC b + W w tan b ] A = area of contact = b` C b = coe cient of soil/wheel cohesion K = coe U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND b = wheel/soil friction angle s = wheel slip ratio cient of soil slip = length of contact patch 26 1 K H (s=0) = 251.6 N 1 e s K Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Tractive Force per Wheel (With Grousers) H = b C b 1 + 2h b N g + W tan b 1 + 0.64 h b arctan b 1 h K s 1 e K A = area of contact = b C b = soil/wheel cohesion = 0.017 N/cm 2 b = wheel/soil friction angle = 35 s = wheel slip ratio (typ. 0.02-0.05) K = coe cient of soil slip = 1.8 cm = length of contact patch = D 2 cos 1 1 h = height of grouser U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND All values typical for lunar soil 27 2z D Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Effect of Soil Thrust Fraction 1.2 Soil Thrust Fraction 1 K 1 e s K Soil Thrust Fraction 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 K/l=0.1 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 10 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Slip Ratio U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 28 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Basic Equation of Vehicle Propulsion DP = H (R c + R b + R g + R r ) DP: Drawbar pull (residual drive force) H: Maximum tractive force of wheels R c : Compaction resistance R b : Bulldozing resistance R g : Gravitational resistance R r : Rolling resistance (internal) U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 29 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics

Terramechanics References Bekker, M.G, Introduction to Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, 1969 Terzaghi, Theoretical Soil Mechanics, 1943 Wong, J.Y. Theory of Ground Vehicles 2 nd Edition, Canada U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND 79 Terramechanics V ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics