Direct Preparation of Dichloropropanol from Glycerol Biodiesel Based Using HCl 37%: a Preliminary Study Herliati a, Robiah Yunus b Zulkefly Kuang c, Lubena a a Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Technology Industry University of Jayabaya Jalan Raya Bogor km 28,8 Jakarta INDONESIA b Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia Serdang MALAYSIA c Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Putra Malaysia Serdang MALAYSIA ABSTRACT Direct preparation of dichloropropanol (DCP) from glycerol was carried out in a batch reactor using HCl 37 %. Dichloropropanol, as a raw material of epichlorohydrin synthesis, can now be prepared easily from crude glycerol which has abundance availability because of biodiesel booming For this synthesis, hydrochloric acid 37 % reacts with glycerol Different organic acids have been tested as catalysts with good performances in terms of both activity and, in particular, selectivity toward the desired 1,3-dichlorinated product. Effect of mol ratio HCl to glycerol was also investigated. Experimental data collected at temperatures 90 o C. The present paper discusses the work on experimental batch reactor for the production of 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol using hydrochloric acid liquid. Keywords: Direct preparation; epichlorohydrin;glycerol dychlorohydrin; dichloropropanol 1. INTRODUCTION The synthesis of dichloropropanols from glycerol has become increasingly important because dichloropropanol is an raw material in the production of epichlorohydrin which is an raw material for synthetic elastomer, sizing agents for paper-making industry, and water treatment. Additionally, dichloropropanol, as a raw material of epichlorohydrin synthesis, can now be prepared easily from crude glycerol which has abundance availability because of biodoesel booming (Barnwal, 2004). Therefore, direct conversion of glycerol to high-value chemicals has attracted much attention (Tesser, 2007). One of the promising methods to convert glycerol to high-value chemical is to produce dichloropropanol (DCP) from glycerol in a single step. Fig. 1 shows the commercial process for producing epichlorohydrin (ECH) from propylene by way of dichloropropanol (DCP). The commercial preparation method of DCP includes two consecutive processes of preparing allyl chloride through chlorination of propylene at a high temperature and preparing DCP through subsequent chlorination of allyl chloride under the condition of excess amount of industrial water (L.Ma, 2007). The produced DCP can be easily converted to ECH by the addition of NaOH. Thus, direct preparation of DCP from glycerol is an environmentally benign process and has many economical advantages. Several processes utilizing gaseous hydrochloric acid as a reactant, however, these processes have problem in handling of gas. Therefore, developing an efficient in the direct preparation of DCP from glycerol using aqueous hydrochloric acid would be a challenging work. 295
Robiah et al (Robiah, 2011) had carried out chlorination reactions by simulation for preparing DCP from glycerol and gaseous hydrochloric acid. Their study focused on both the determination effect of mol ratio reactant and effect of percentage of the catalyst. Based on their finding, both mol ratio of HCL to glycerol and type of catalyst have marked effects on the reaction selectivity of the chlorination reaction. Therefore, investigating the effect of mol ratio of HCL to glycerol and type of catalyst on the preparation of DCP would become the initial step taken in this experimental study. Consequently, the aim of this paper is to present the experimental results obtained carried out on the batch stirred tank reactor by considering the effects of type of catalysts, mol ratio HCl to glycerol and effect of temperature on reaction selectivity and yield for DCP. Figure 1. A commercial for producing epichlorohydrin (ECH) from propylene by way of dichloropropanol (DCP) 2. EXPERIMENTAL 2.1. Catalyst Commercially available carboxylic acid catalysts were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co. The experimental activity has then been focused on the performances of molecules containing carboxylic acid groups with a lower volatility with respect to acetic acid, such as propionic acid, malonic acid and lactic acid 2.2. Direct preparation of dichloropropanol (DCP) from glycerol Direct preparation of DCP from glycerol was carried out in a liquid- phase batch rector (200 ml) using carboxylic acid catalysts. 12.6 g of glycerol (reactant), 78.9 g of aqueous HCl solution (37 wt%, chlorination agent), 20 g of H 2 O (reaction medium), and 10 mol percent catalyst were charged into a batch reactor, after the homogeneous solution was heated to 90 o C with vigorous stirring (450 rpm), the reaction pressure at 1 bar. The catalytic reaction was carried out at 90 o C for 3 h with vigorous stirring. The reaction products were analyzed with a gas 296
chromatograph MS. Conversion of glycerol and selectivity for DCP were calculated according to the following equations: ( ) (1) ( ).. (2) 2.3. Samples Preparation and Analysis. Sample preparation using method is developed by Tesser et al (Tesser, 2007) as the following when a sample is collected, the dissolved residue hydrochloric acid, and eventually the catalyst, are neutralized by means of calcium carbonate. About 3 cm 3 of sample are treated with 0.5 g of the mentioned salt and kept at 100 C for 30 min in order to remove also the water formed by the reaction. The vial with the sample is then centrifuged in order to separate the precipitate formed, and the clarified solution is then analyzed by using GC-MS. 3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION 3.1. Effect of Type of Catalyst on selectivity for 1,3-DCP The experimental activity has then been focused on the performances of molecules containing carboxylic acid groups with a lower volatility with respect to acetic acid, such as the ones reported in Table 1. This screening has been performed, at 90 o C. by using a constant concentration of 10% by mol. From the exposed considerations, the best catalyst for the reaction studied would present the character of high activity and selectivity and, contemporarily, a high volatility in order to ensure the minimization of its losses. In Table 1 is also reported the product distribution obtained after 3 h of reaction for all the catalysts considered for the screening. It is observed that malonic acid shows the best performance. Table 1. Effect of Type of catalyst on selectivity for 1,3-DCP Type of catalyst Amount of catalysts Selectivity to 1,3-DCP at 3 h (%) PPA 15.84 28.96167494 MA 16.19 44.33551901 LA 15.7 11.4100516 AA 15.73 13.94977729 Others experimental condition: T= 90 o C, glycerol loaded = 12.6 g, aqueous HCl solution loaded = 78.9 g, catalysts concentration = 10% by mol PPA : Propionic Acid MA : Malonic acid LA : Lactic acid 297
% selectivity Proceeding of the 4th Sriwijaya International Seminar on Energy Science and Technology, AA: Acetic Acid 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 catalyst Figure 1. Effect of catalyst on selectivity for 1,3-DCP 3.2. Effect of Mol ratio HCl to Glyerol on both reaction conversion and selectivity DCP chlorination is reaction between hydrochloric acid 37 % with glycerol in vary reactant mol ratio, this reaction using malonic acid as a catalyst with 10 percent by mol. Table 2, and Figure 2 and 3 show that not only conversion may increase but also selectivity may increase when reactant mol ratio increase until 28 (start from 16), for reactant mol ratio above that point both conversion and selectivity will decrease. This results very strong agreement with the reported by Robiah et al by simulation beside that the literature also mentioned the value of specific rate constant will higher when possibility impact between reactant is more at certain level mol ratio but it will be slower when molecules atom which react is too much because of flood point effect. Table 2. Effect of mol ratio on both reaction conversion and selectivity for 1,3-DCP Mol ratio HCl to Glycerol Conversion Selectivity % % 16 89.01674048 46.0251046 20 89.6323214 51.73913043 24 89.76191738 54.31309904 28 95.98252454 95.41666667 32 91.90025109 88.23529412 T= 90 o C, acetic acid catalyst concentration = 10% by mol 298
% Selectivity % conversion Proceeding of the 4th Sriwijaya International Seminar on Energy Science and Technology, 100 95 90 85 80 16 20 24 28 32 Mol Rasio HCl to Gliserol Figure 2. Effect of mol ratio on reaction conversion for 1,3-DCP 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 16 20 24 28 32 Mol Rasio HCl to Gliserol Figure 3.Effect of mol ratio HCl to Glyserol on selectivity for 1,3-DCP 3.3 Effect of Temperature on yield of 1,3-Dikloropropanol The explored temperature range for this runs is 80-120 o C by mol reactant ratio is 28 in the present malonic acid as a catalyst which loaded 10 % by mol for 3 hours. In terms of thermodynamic discussion that chlorination reaction system is a exothermic, as a consequence increase temperature at certain level will lower yield of product. It shows in Table 3 and Figure 4 which yield product is starting decrease after 110 o C. Table 3. Effect of Temperatur on yield for 1,3-DCP T o C Fraksi yield 80 0.098664 90 0.257352 100 0.25762 110 0.363655 120 0.32603 T= 90 o C, glycerol loaded = 12.6 g, aqueous HCl solution loaded = 139.2 g, 299
Fraksi yield Proceeding of the 4th Sriwijaya International Seminar on Energy Science and Technology, catalysts concentration = 10% by mol 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 80 90 100 110 120 Temperatur oc Figure 4. Effect of Temperature on yield for 1,3-DCP 4. CONCLUSION In the present paper, serial experimental study was carried out on the DCP production using aqueous hydrochloric acid. There are three parameters were observed such as screening of catalyst, effect of mol ratio and effect of temperature. In terms of selectivity, it is strongly dependent on type of catalyst which malonic acid shows the best performance, for mol ratio of reactant, the best ratio HCl to glycerol so far is 28. Therefore the best temperature reaction is showed at 110 o C using malonic acid 10 % by mol. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This project is supported by also supported by Hibah Competition funded by Ministery of Higher Education Indonesia and also ScienceFund grant funded by Ministery of Science and Innovation Malaysia. These financial assistances are gratefully acknowledged. REFERENCES 1. Barnwal, B.K.; Sharma, M.P.2004. Prospects of biodiesel production from vegetable oils in India Alternate Hydro Energy Centre. Indian Institute of Technology; 247667 2. F.Kastanek, J.Zahradnik, J.Kratochvil, J.Cermak.1993. Chemical Reactors For Gas-Liquid System, Czech Republic: New York 3. Giri, A.K.1997.Genetic toxicology of epichlorohydrin: a Review. Mutation Research, Vol (386): 25-38. 4. K.G. Denbigh, J.C.R. Turner.1984.Chemical Reactor Theory: An Introduction, Chambrigde: University of Chambridge 5. L.M.Rose.1981.Chemical Reactor Design in Practice, Amsterdam: New York 300
6. Richard M. Felder, Rou Ronald W.2004.Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes.Wiley:New York 7. L. Ma, J.W. Zhu, X.Q. Yuan, Q. Yue.2007. Synthesis of Epichlorohydrin from Dichloropropanols. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol (85): 1580-1585 8. Michael McCoy.2006.Bussiness Glycerin Surplus: Plants are closing, and new uses for the chemical are being found, Vol (84), Number 6 9. 10.Tesser,R; Santacesaria, E.;.Di Serio, G.; Di Nuzzi, G.; Fiandra, V. 2007. Kinetics of Glycerol Chlorination with Hydrochlorc Acid. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol.(46):6456-6465. 10. Robiah yunus. Herliati, Dzulkefly kuang, A.S.Intan, Z.Z. Abidin, 2011. Preliminary Design of Semi-Batch Reactor for Synthesis 1,3-Dichloro-2-Propanol Using Aspen Plus 301