A locally finite characterization of AE(0) and related classes of compacta

Similar documents
ALGEBRAS AND COMPACTA

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

Noetherian types of homogeneous compacta

APPLICATIONS OF ANOTHER CHARACTERIZATION OF βn \ N

Notes about Filters. Samuel Mimram. December 6, 2012

DENSELY k-separable COMPACTA ARE DENSELY SEPARABLE

Intermediate Model Theory

ON VAN DOUWEN SPACES AND RETRACTS OF βn

Spectra of Tukey types of ultrafilters on Boolean algebras

Congruence lattices and Compact Intersection Property

Part II. Logic and Set Theory. Year

Well-Ordered Sets, Ordinals and Cardinals Ali Nesin 1 July 2001

On poset Boolean algebras

A BOOLEAN ALGEBRA AND A BANACH SPACE OBTAINED BY PUSH-OUT ITERATION

An algebraic approach to Gelfand Duality

Ultrafilters and Set Theory. Andreas Blass University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI

GREGORY TREES, THE CONTINUUM, AND MARTIN S AXIOM

CHAPTER 4. βs as a semigroup

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

MV-algebras and fuzzy topologies: Stone duality extended

EFIMOV S PROBLEM AND BOOLEAN ALGEBRAS

Axioms of separation

D, such that f(u) = f(v) whenever u = v, has a multiplicative refinement g : [λ] <ℵ 0

FAR POINTS AND DISCRETELY GENERATED SPACES

The topology of ultrafilters as subspaces of 2 ω

PSEUDO P-POINTS AND SPLITTING NUMBER

A NOTE ON THE EIGHTFOLD WAY

C -ALGEBRAS MATH SPRING 2015 PROBLEM SET #6

SOME CALKIN ALGEBRAS HAVE OUTER AUTOMORPHISMS

CHARACTERIZING CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS ON COMPACT SPACES

Spectra of Tukey types of ultrafilters on Boolean algebras

ON SUBALGEBRAS OF BOOLEAN INTERVAL ALGEBRAS

TUKEY CLASSES OF ULTRAFILTERS ON ω

Chain Conditions of Horn and Tarski

Non-trivial automorphisms from variants of small d

On Some Min-Max Cardinals on Boolean Algebras

Maharam Algebras. Equipe de Logique, Université de Paris 7, 2 Place Jussieu, Paris, France

GO-SPACES AND NOETHERIAN SPECTRA

Every Linear Order Isomorphic to Its Cube is Isomorphic to Its Square

MORE ABOUT SPACES WITH A SMALL DIAGONAL

TUKEY QUOTIENTS, PRE-IDEALS, AND NEIGHBORHOOD FILTERS WITH CALIBRE (OMEGA 1, OMEGA) by Jeremiah Morgan BS, York College of Pennsylvania, 2010

arxiv: v3 [math.gn] 8 Aug 2016

COMPACT C-CLOSED SPACES NEED NOT BE SEQUENTIAL

DO FIVE OUT OF SIX ON EACH SET PROBLEM SET

CERTAIN WEAKLY GENERATED NONCOMPACT, PSEUDO-COMPACT TOPOLOGIES ON TYCHONOFF CUBES. Leonard R. Rubin University of Oklahoma, USA

SUBALGEBRAS AND HOMOMORPHIC IMAGES OF THE RIEGER-NISHIMURA LATTICE

Description of the book Set Theory

Compactifications of Discrete Spaces

SOME CALKIN ALGEBRAS HAVE OUTER AUTOMORPHISMS

WHY Y-C.C. DAVID CHODOUNSKÝ AND JINDŘICH ZAPLETAL

1 MONOTONE COMPLETE C*-ALGEBRAS AND GENERIC DYNAMICS

PROPER FORCING REMASTERED

On Šapirovskiĭ s theorem

CARDINAL RESTRICTIONS ON SOME HOMOGENEOUS COMPACTA. István Juhász*, Peter Nyikos**, and Zoltán Szentmiklóssy*

The Arkhangel skiĭ Tall problem under Martin s Axiom

3. FORCING NOTION AND GENERIC FILTERS

Sets and Motivation for Boolean algebra

Aronszajn Compacta. July 1, 2008

Measurability Problems for Boolean Algebras

STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF UNIVERSAL MINIMAL DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS FOR DISCRETE SEMIGROUPS. Bohuslav Balcar and Frantisek Franek.

The projectivity of C -algebras and the topology of their spectra

MH 7500 THEOREMS. (iii) A = A; (iv) A B = A B. Theorem 5. If {A α : α Λ} is any collection of subsets of a space X, then

Distributive Lattices with Quantifier: Topological Representation

A FIRST COUNTABLE, INITIALLY ω 1 -COMPACT BUT NON-COMPACT SPACE

Löwenheim-Skolem Theorems, Countable Approximations, and L ω. David W. Kueker (Lecture Notes, Fall 2007)

Forcing Axioms and Inner Models of Set Theory

SOME COMBINATORIAL PRINCIPLES DEFINED IN TERMS OF ELEMENTARY SUBMODELS. 1. Introduction

Set-Theoretic Methods in General Topology

Part II Logic and Set Theory

VARIATIONS FOR SEPARATING CLUB GUESSING PRINCIPLES

On Recognizable Languages of Infinite Pictures

On Recognizable Languages of Infinite Pictures

Qualifying Exam Logic August 2005

The rise and fall of uncountable models

A CHARACTERIZATION OF POWER HOMOGENEITY G. J. RIDDERBOS

ABSTRACT INTEGRATION CHAPTER ONE

FORCING WITH SEQUENCES OF MODELS OF TWO TYPES

ω-stable Theories: Introduction

A fresh perspective on canonical extensions for bounded lattices

Jónsson posets and unary Jónsson algebras

Congruence Boolean Lifting Property

A topological duality for posets

UNITARY UNIFICATION OF S5 MODAL LOGIC AND ITS EXTENSIONS

8. Distributive Lattices. Every dog must have his day.

The Vaught Conjecture Do uncountable models count?

THE PRECIPITOUSNESS OF TAIL CLUB GUESSING IDEALS

Locally Connected HS/HL Compacta

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gn] 28 Mar 2007

Classical Theory of Cardinal Characteristics

Scales, topological reflections, and large cardinal issues by Peter Nyikos

Winter School on Galois Theory Luxembourg, February INTRODUCTION TO PROFINITE GROUPS Luis Ribes Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada

Lecture 11: Minimal types

Varieties of Heyting algebras and superintuitionistic logics

MODAL COMPACT HAUSDORFF SPACES

COUNTABLE CHAINS OF DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES AS MAXIMAL SEMILATTICE QUOTIENTS OF POSITIVE CONES OF DIMENSION GROUPS

INTRODUCTION TO CARDINAL NUMBERS

ITERATIONS WITH MIXED SUPPORT

COUNTING SUBMODULES OF A MODULE OVER A NOETHERIAN COMMUTATIVE RING

The prime spectrum of MV-algebras based on a joint work with A. Di Nola and P. Belluce

Topology Proceedings. COPYRIGHT c by Topology Proceedings. All rights reserved.

Transcription:

A locally finite characterization of AE(0) and related classes of compacta David Milovich Texas A&M International University david.milovich@tamiu.edu http://www.tamiu.edu/ dmilovich/ March 13, 2014 Spring Topology and Dynamics Conference University of Richmond 1 / 9

Stone duality notation A compactum is a compact Hausdorff space. A boolean space is a compactum with a clopen base. Clop is the contravarient functor from boolean spaces and continuous maps to boolean algebras and homomorphisms. Clop(X ) is ({K X : K clopen},,, K X \ K}). Clop(f )(K) = f 1 [K]. Modulo isomorphism, the inverse of Clop is the functor Ult: Ult(A) is {U A : U ultrafilter} with clopen base {{U Ult(A) : a U} : a A}; Ult(φ)(U) = φ 1 [U]. 2 / 9

Open is dual to relatively complete. A boolean subalgebra A of B is called relatively complete if every b B has a least upper bound in A. Let A rc B abbreviate A is relatively complete in B. A boolean homomorphism φ: A B is called relatively complete if φ[a] rc B. A boolean homomorphism φ is relatively complete iff Ult(φ) is open. 3 / 9

AE(0) spaces Definition A boolean space X is an absolute extensor of dimension zero, or AE(0) for short, if, for every continuous f : Y X with Y Z boolean, f extends to a continuous g : Z X. 4 / 9

AE(0) spaces Definition A boolean space X is an absolute extensor of dimension zero, or AE(0) for short, if, for every continuous f : Y X with Y Z boolean, f extends to a continuous g : Z X. Given a boolean space X of weight κ, the following are known to be equivalent: X is AE(0). X is Dugundji, i.e., a retract of 2 κ. X 2 κ = 2 κ. There exists Y such that X = Y 2 κ and, for all α < β < κ, the projection π α,β : Y β Y α is open. Clop(X ) has an additive rc-skeleton, i.e., if n < ω, θ is a regular cardinal, and Clop(X ) N i H(θ) for all i < n, then Clop(X ) i<n N i rc Clop(X ). 4 / 9

Multicommutativity A poset diagram of boolean spaces is pair of sequences ( X, f ) with dom( X ) a poset, Xi a boolean space for all i dom( X ), fj,i : X i X j continuous for all j < i, and f k,i = f k,j f j,i for all k < j < i. Given a poset diagram ( X, f ) and I dom( X ), let { lim(x i : i I ) = p } X i : {j < i} I p(j) = f j,i (p(i)). i I Call a poset diagram ( X, f ) multicommutative if, for all i dom( X ), j<i f j,i maps X i onto lim(x j : j < i). 5 / 9

A new characterization of AE(0) A poset P is called locally finite if every lower cone is finite. A poset diagram ( X, f ) is locally finite if dom( X ) is locally finite and every X i is finite. A locally finite poset is a lattice iff every nonempty finite subset has a least upper bound. A poset diagram ( X, f ) is called a lattice diagram if dom( X ) is a lattice. Theorem Given a boolean space X, the following are equivalent. X is AE(0). X is homeomorphic to the limit of a multicommutative locally finite poset diagram. X is homeomorphic to the limit of a multicommutative locally finite lattice diagram. 6 / 9

Long ω 1 -approximation sequences For every ordinal α, let α = max{β α : β < ω 1 or γ α γ = β}; α = α + [α]; 7 / 9

Long ω 1 -approximation sequences For every ordinal α, let α = max{β α : β < ω 1 or γ α γ = β}; α = α + [α]; [α]0 = α; [α]n+1 = [[α] n ]; α n = i<n [α] i ; 7 / 9

Long ω 1 -approximation sequences For every ordinal α, let α = max{β α : β < ω 1 or γ α γ = β}; α = α + [α]; [α]0 = α; [α]n+1 = [[α] n ]; α n = i<n [α] i ; ℸ(α) = min{n < ω : [α] n = 0}. If 1 k < ω and α ω k, then ℸ(α) k. Given θ regular and uncountable, a long ω 1 -approximation sequence is a transfinite sequence (M α ) α<η of countable elementary substructures of H(θ) such that (M β ) β<α M α for all α < η. (Milovich, 2008) If M is a long ω 1 -approximation sequence and α, β dom( M), then Mβ M α β α M α M β M α ; for all i < ℸ(α), M i α = {M γ : α i γ < α i+1 } is a directed union; hence, Mα i H(θ). 7 / 9

n-commutativity Call a lattice diagram ( X, f ) n-commutative if, for all i dom( X ) and all j 0,..., j n 1 < i, k K f k,i maps X i onto lim(x k : k K) where K = m<n {k : k j m}. Call a boolean space n-commutative if it is homeomorphic to the limit of an n-commutative locally finite lattice diagram. 8 / 9

n-commutativity Call a lattice diagram ( X, f ) n-commutative if, for all i dom( X ) and all j 0,..., j n 1 < i, k K f k,i maps X i onto lim(x k : k K) where K = m<n {k : k j m}. Call a boolean space n-commutative if it is homeomorphic to the limit of an n-commutative locally finite lattice diagram. The Stone dual of 2-commutative boolean space has been studied under the name of strong Freese-Nation property. There are 2-commutative boolean spaces of weight ℵ 2 that are known to not be AE(0), e.g., the symmetric square of 2 ω 2. 8 / 9

n-commutativity Call a lattice diagram ( X, f ) n-commutative if, for all i dom( X ) and all j 0,..., j n 1 < i, k K f k,i maps X i onto lim(x k : k K) where K = m<n {k : k j m}. Call a boolean space n-commutative if it is homeomorphic to the limit of an n-commutative locally finite lattice diagram. The Stone dual of 2-commutative boolean space has been studied under the name of strong Freese-Nation property. There are 2-commutative boolean spaces of weight ℵ 2 that are known to not be AE(0), e.g., the symmetric square of 2 ω 2. (Milovich) Every locally finite lattice of size ℵ n 1 contains a cofinal suborder that is an n-ladder, i.e., a locally finite lattice in which every element has at most n maximal strict lower bounds. 8 / 9

n-commutativity Call a lattice diagram ( X, f ) n-commutative if, for all i dom( X ) and all j 0,..., j n 1 < i, k K f k,i maps X i onto lim(x k : k K) where K = m<n {k : k j m}. Call a boolean space n-commutative if it is homeomorphic to the limit of an n-commutative locally finite lattice diagram. The Stone dual of 2-commutative boolean space has been studied under the name of strong Freese-Nation property. There are 2-commutative boolean spaces of weight ℵ 2 that are known to not be AE(0), e.g., the symmetric square of 2 ω 2. (Milovich) Every locally finite lattice of size ℵ n 1 contains a cofinal suborder that is an n-ladder, i.e., a locally finite lattice in which every element has at most n maximal strict lower bounds. Hence, a boolean space of weight ℵ n 1 is AE(0) iff it is n-commutative. Hence, there are 2-commutative boolean spaces of weight ℵ 2 that are not 3-commutative. 8 / 9

The strong Freese-Nation property is strictly stronger A boolean algebra A is said to have the Freese-Nation property, or FN, if A M rc A whenever A M H(θ). 9 / 9

The strong Freese-Nation property is strictly stronger A boolean algebra A is said to have the Freese-Nation property, or FN, if A M rc A whenever A M H(θ). Heindorf and Shapiro introduced the strong Freese-Nation property, or SFN, and showed that it implied the FN, and asked if the implication was strict. 9 / 9

The strong Freese-Nation property is strictly stronger A boolean algebra A is said to have the Freese-Nation property, or FN, if A M rc A whenever A M H(θ). Heindorf and Shapiro introduced the strong Freese-Nation property, or SFN, and showed that it implied the FN, and asked if the implication was strict. If A is a boolean algebra, (M α ) α< A is a long ω 1 -approximation sequence, and A M 0, then, for all α < A, i < ℸ(α), and a A M α \ β<α M β, set σ i (a) = min{b A M i α : b a} if it exists. 9 / 9

The strong Freese-Nation property is strictly stronger A boolean algebra A is said to have the Freese-Nation property, or FN, if A M rc A whenever A M H(θ). Heindorf and Shapiro introduced the strong Freese-Nation property, or SFN, and showed that it implied the FN, and asked if the implication was strict. If A is a boolean algebra, (M α ) α< A is a long ω 1 -approximation sequence, and A M 0, then, for all α < A, i < ℸ(α), and a A M α \ β<α M β, set σ i (a) = min{b A M i α : b a} if it exists. (Milovich) A has the FN iff, for all M, α, i, a as above, σi (a) exists. (Milovich) A has the SFN iff, for all M as above, A = (A,,,, σ 0, σ 1, σ 2,...) is a locally finite partial algebra, i.e., every finite subset of A is contained in a finite subalgebra of A. (Milovich) There is a boolean algebra of size ℵ 2 that has the FN but not the SFN. 9 / 9