European Landscape Convention in the Slovak Republic

Similar documents
Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention

Strengthening the cooperation in the region: Carpathian, Tisa,, Danube and Black Sea areas

Declaration Population and culture

COUNCIL OF EUROPE S SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY

16540/14 EE/cm 1 DG E 1A

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

The National Spatial Strategy

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /14 CULT 68

CLLD Cooperation OFFER

Third Cohesion report February 2004

Navigable maritime and river waterways in the seaside - Danube Delta area and the connected rural development

State initiative following up the 2006 national planning report

GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES AS PART OF THE GLOBAL, REGIONAL AND NATIONAL SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURES

PROTOCOL ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALPINE CONVENTION OF 1991 RELATING TO SPATIAL PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

CEMAT results - over the years

Country Fiche Lithuania

Figure 10. Travel time accessibility for heavy trucks

Land Use in the context of sustainable, smart and inclusive growth

Legal problems of environmental management. Spatial planning and space management. M. Gajewski 2014 / 2015

ESPON support for Targeted Analyses Ilona Raugze Director

Shetland Islands Council

The ESPON Programme. Goals Main Results Future

ESPON SEMINAR «WHERE ARE EUROPEAN CITIES HEADING? EVIDENCE FOR BETTER POLICY-MAKING» 7-8 DECEMBER BRATISLAVA

The European territory: Strategic developmentd

Launch of the ESPON 2013 Programme. European observation network on territorial development and cohesion

THE IMPACT OF LANDSLIDE AREAS ON MUNICIPAL SPATIAL PLANNING

Spatial Planning in the Republic of Armenia

Interregional Cooperation in the Apennines

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS

Tackling urban sprawl: towards a compact model of cities? David Ludlow University of the West of England (UWE) 19 June 2014

Urbanization and Sustainable Development of Cities: A Ready Engine to Promote Economic Growth and Cooperation

MR. George ALEXAKIS, parallel session 3. "Mediterranean Sea Region. laying the conditions. for sustainable growth and jobs"

I&CLC2000 in support to new policy initiatives (INSPIRE, GMES,..)

The Governance of Land Use

The Governance of Land Use

r10_summary.qxd :19 Page 245 ABOUT THE BOOK

The National Policy Strategy for Infrastructure and Spatial Planning CODE24 CONFERENCE. Emiel Reiding

MiniStRy of national DevelopMent, MiniStRy for national economy. Regional Status Report of Hungary

CADASTRAL DELIMITATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE TERRITORY IN ROMANIA IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE GENERAL URBAN PLANS

Measures Also Significant Factors of Flood Disaster Reduction

Urban-rural relations in Europe

Governance and Functional Urban Areas CEMAT Conference

Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region, transnational and project perspective Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat

Country Fiche Sweden Updated May 2018

CAMP SLOVENIA. Mezek Slavko RRC Koper. Project coordinator November 2005

Summary. Recommendations on the Fifth Policy Document on Spatial Planning September 2001

TERRITORIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: AN APPROACH TO IMPROVE THE VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL INTEGRATION OF EU POLICIES

MODELS AND TOOLS FOR GOVERNANCE OF

Marine Spatial Planning in Hellas; Recent Facts and Perspectives

Harmonizing spatial databases and services at local and regional level

Contract title: Technical assistance for multi-annual programming of future cross border cooperation programme in the Romania-Serbia cooperation area

Multinational Spatial Planning Experience

I. INTRODUCTION. 1 Regulation EU No 1303/2013 on the Common Provisions on the ESI Funds.

Work Packages. RECROS Project development workshop. Prague, 30 th April 2015

Presentation by Thangavel Palanivel Senior Strategic Advisor and Chief Economist UNDP Regional Bureau for Asia-Pacific

Plan4all (econtentplus project)

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the Second Committee (A/67/440/Add.2)]

Characteristic features of toponym objects and their dynamics

The Governance of Land Use

INSPIRATION results and benefits for the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre

Making maps: Traditions and perceptions in Europe. European spatial planning and cartographic representations

Local Development Pilot Project: Island of Cres. Ranka Saračević Würth, Ministry of Culture, Republic of Croatia

Access to MRM deposits in European countries and associated territories. Case Study: Aggregates plans and their future:

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CARPATHIAN INTEGRATED BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION SYSTEM

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

INSPIRE Basics. Vlado Cetl European Commission Joint Research Centre.

CONFERENCE STATEMENT

May kindly Tim Page prepare the Bulgaria page header with the same design as the others? Bulgaria Urban Region of Sofia

Current LCLUC challenges in SCERIN: Assessing Ecosystem Function and Processes

CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF POPULATION AND HOUSING FUND BETWEEN TWO CENSUSES 1 - South Muntenia Development Region

How proximity to a city influences the performance of rural regions by Lewis Dijkstra and Hugo Poelman

OPINION. Results of EU Structural Policy in NSPA

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

URBAN SPRAWL THE LEGAL CONTEXT AND TERRITORIAL PRACTICES IN ROMANIA

Maria Andrzejewska UNEP/GRID Warsaw Centre

Experience and perspectives of using EU funds and other funding for the implementation of district renovation projects

BURGAS CASE STUDY: LAND-SEA INTERACTIONS. Dr. Margarita Stancheva

Introduction to the Gozo & Comino Local Plan

Socio-Economic and Ecological Indicators of the Metropolitan Area of Bucharest

Lombardy Region Territorial Context and Planning Structures

City and SUMP of Ravenna

How to measure Territorial Cohesion and Cooperation?

What has changed? Spatial development of the current Hungarian border areas nowadays and one century ago

New Prospects for Peripheral Rural Regions Helmut Hiess Glasgow, 19th of May 2010

UNIT 4: POLITICAL ORGANIZATION OF SPACE

Sustainable and Harmonised Development for Smart Cities The Role of Geospatial Reference Data. Peter Creuzer

Multi-level spatial planning in a cross border context

E/CONF.105/115/CRP.115***

Development of Nature Parks as Chance for Rural Development and Maintenance of Rural Heritage

Competitiveness or Cohesion? A Phase Strategy of European Spatial Development

Status of implementation of the INSPIRE Directive 2016 Country Fiches. COUNTRY FICHE Croatia

Maritime Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea Region

Towards a Polycentric Europe

Management Planning & Implementation of Communication Measures for Terrestrial Natura 2000 Sites in the Maltese Islands Epsilon-Adi Consortium

Urban and rural poles in positive interrelations

The Governance of Land Use

Entrepreneurship on islands and other peripheral regions. Specific Contract No 6511 implementing Framework contract No CDR/DE/16/2015/

Spatial Disaggregation of Land Cover and Cropping Information: Current Results and Further steps

Transcription:

13th COUNCIL OF EUROPE MEETING OF THE WORKSHOPS FOR THE EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION European Landscape Convention in the Slovak Republic Mrs. Ida Vanáková, state advisor, Department of Spatial Planning Ministry of Transport, construction and regional development of the Slovak republic

was signed on 30 May 2005 was agreed by Slovak parliament on 23 June 2005 was ratified on 9 August 2005 came into force on 1 December 2005 Landscape Atlas of Slovak republic published in 2002, 10 chapters, 344 pages, in slovak + english language

(Common strategy) - cooperation in the field of spatial development of the EU Countries: - the Czech republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia (the Visegrad group V4) - Bulgaria and Romania (+2) - stems from Common Spatial Development of V4+2 Countries, whcih resulted in the Ministerial conclusions of the ministers responsible for regional development of Visegrád four, Bulgaria and Romania, adopted on 29 th March 2010 in Budapest - ministers acknowledged the work of the Steering group Common Strategy mutual awareness, sharing of knowledge, joint communication, interconnection

Spatial development in this Common strategy is understood as a development of values and possibilities within a territory, which brings profit to all involved. Such spatial development is the main idea of this strategy. Acertaining, overcoming of barriers and their utilisation for the common spatial development of neighbouring countries and regions is the main goal of the Common strategy. In the document development poles and development axes in a unified manner and their no-continuations were defined. Development poles = parts of spatial/settlement structure that are by certain characteristics attractive for investments and inhabitants Development axes = strips of territory connecting development poles and possesing similar (identical) properties as development pole s but with a lower intesity of representation of these features.

The Visegrad Group territories V4+2 (Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria) cover an area of more than 880,000 square kilometers, which constitutes approximately 20% of European Union's total area. For evaluation of current land use, this document uses data from Cadastre Authority and CORINE LandCover Project. Structure of use of lands in V4+2 countries in year 2011 80 70 Share of individual land classes in V4+2 countries agricultural land forest land water surface built up area other areas 60 50 40 30 20 farmland 1991 farmland 2011 hereof arable land 1991 hereof arable land 2011 forest land 1991 forest land 2011 10 0 BGR CZE HUN POL ROM SVK

Main reasons driving the land use changes are fall of Communism, land ownership changes, economic growth of major urban centres and increase of living standards. Economic growth has fuelled the expansion of cities with new built-up areas created at the expense of arable land. This trend is visible in all V4+2 countries. According the results from CORINE LandCover project a relatively large part of territory (almost 90% of the state area) is covered by agricultural areas, forest areas and semi natural areas.

Various obstacles that interfere with development processes, slowing down spatial development or making it impossible. Natural barriers the most important and the most pressing issues to be solved Other spatial barriers Economic barriers Social barries Administrative barriers Linguistic barriers Legislative barriers Natural barriers high mountains wide rivers, lakes, water reservoirs Many of these have also been declared as large protected nature and landscape areas. The most notable natural barriers of V4+2 countries are Carpathian mountains and the Danube river, which are not just border barriers but also internal barries within some countries.

Very significant natural barriers high mountains (usually from approx. 1 501 m above sea level and higher) determined from contour lines observable from map backgrounds for Central Europe and the Balkans (marked up to an altitude of 1 000 m in the interval of 500 m), taking into account the relative heights and slopes of the terrain. Mountain ranges higher than 2 000 m occupy very small areas these are the highest mountain peaks on the borders of Slovakia and Poland, in Romania and Bulgaria; the highest peaks in the territory Bulgaria just below 3 000 m); wide rivers (usually 501 m and wider up to the total width is included also a narrow canyon or related wetlands), usually in estuaries and the large river Danube; national parks, NATURA 2000. Significant natural barriers medium sized mountains, (usually approx. 701 1 500 m above sea level); medium wide rivers (usually 150 500 m width); protected areas and landscapes and other large protected natural areas of a similar legislative character.

Territorial Agenda of EU 2020 main aim is an educated and sustainable Europe promoting an optimal usage and integration of all various regions with respect to their natural and cultural specifics. Point 17: the neccesity of a better interlinking of regions at European and national level, limiting of the peripheral position of border regions and a better usage of their human, cultural, economic and ecological resources. Point 26: an emphasis on polycentric development aiming towards a decrease in the strong polarisation of economic results. Point 30: rural areas, river valleys, lake basins and other types of territory heve specific features or suffer serious and lasting natural or demographical disadvantages, such as a low density of population, which affects their development potential. Paragraph 35 urges to ensure the necessary acces to road, railway, water and air transport and to broadband trans-european energetic networks. Point 36 draws attention to the development of trans-european TEN-T networks and the development of second class roads at regional level and the accesibility of púeripheral areas, where due to social and economic disadvantages an exclusion of vulnerable groups may occur. Where appropriate, it is neccesary to develop links across spatial barriers. Point 42 notes that taking into account the territorial impacts while creating strategies can aid to limit the formation of barriers and unintended territorial impacts on territorial units

Outer and inner natural barriers of spatial development and bottlenecks V4+2 countries included environmental protected areas

Barriers of spatial development and bottlenecks V4+2 countries included environmental protected areas vs. transport network plans

Outer and inner natural barriers of spatial development and bottlenecks V4+2 countries included environmental protected areas vs. transport network plans

Barriers of spatial development and bottlenecks V4+2 countries included environmental protected areas vs. technical infrastructure plans

Outer and inner natural barriers of spatial development and bottlenecks V4+2 countries included environmental protected areas vs. technical infrastructure plans

Barriers of spatial development and bottlenecks V4+2 countries included environmental protected areas vs. technical and transport infrastructure plans

Outer and inner natural barriers of spatial development and bottlenecks V4+2 countries included environmental protected areas vs. technical and transport infrastructure plans

Raising mutual awareness of national approaches and processes in the field of spatial development with the aim to facilitate futher cooperation Formulating the Common Spatial Development Strategy of the V4+2 Countries in the European context Stipulation of topics, which would be the subject of futher cooperation Common discussion of the European planning processes in the field of spatial development

Cooperation during the creation and implementation of national spatial development policies of the V4+2 countries Utilisation of a synergetic benefit of the common dynamic spatial development development of transport infrastructure links between development poles as the main networks of cities and regions development of energy systems and networks development of values and sustainable utilisation of natural and cultural heritage for a common spatial development Diversified spatial development of the EU Development of a deeper cooperation during the solving of spatial development problems at the intersection of three countries

Thank you for your attention!