Relativistic electron microscopy of hadron dynamics

Similar documents
Measuring transverse size with virtual photons

Complex Systems of Hadrons and Nuclei

ELECTRON-MUON SCATTERING

Diffractive Dijet Production with Leading Proton in ep Collisions at HERA

22/ Breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Selection rules for rotational-vibrational transitions. P, R branches.

High Energy Physics. Lecture 5 The Passage of Particles through Matter

Searches for Contact Interactions at HERA

Standard Model - Electroweak Interactions. Standard Model. Outline. Weak Neutral Interactions. Electroweak Theory. Experimental Tests.

Forces. Quantum ElectroDynamics. α = = We have now:

Coupled Pendulums. Two normal modes.

The van der Waals interaction 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 20 April 2012

Electroweak studies and search for new phenomena at HERA

PHYSICS 489/1489 LECTURE 7: QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS

fiziks Institute for NET/JRF, GATE, IIT JAM, M.Sc. Entrance, JEST, TIFR and GRE in Physics NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS NET/JRF (JUNE-2011)

Outline. Thanks to Ian Blockland and Randy Sobie for these slides Lifetimes of Decaying Particles Scattering Cross Sections Fermi s Golden Rule

Hydrogen Atom and One Electron Ions

Addition of angular momentum

Contemporary, atomic, nuclear, and particle physics

DIS-Parity. Search for New Physics Through Parity Violation In Deep Inelastic Electron Scattering. The Physics Case

On the Hamiltonian of a Multi-Electron Atom

Lecture 37 (Schrödinger Equation) Physics Spring 2018 Douglas Fields

Addition of angular momentum

Collisions between electrons and ions

HERA. Marc DAVID. On behalf of. H1 and ZEUS COLLABORATIONS. luminosity that increases steadily from year to year. The positron beam energy E e is 27.

orbiting electron turns out to be wrong even though it Unfortunately, the classical visualization of the

E hf. hf c. 2 2 h 2 2 m v f ' f 2f ' f cos c

6. The Interaction of Light and Matter

Phys 402: Nonlinear Spectroscopy: SHG and Raman Scattering

Lecture 28 Title: Diatomic Molecule : Vibrational and Rotational spectra

Background: We have discussed the PIB, HO, and the energy of the RR model. In this chapter, the H-atom, and atomic orbitals.

Ch. 24 Molecular Reaction Dynamics 1. Collision Theory

Intro to Nuclear and Particle Physics (5110)

Derivation of Electron-Electron Interaction Terms in the Multi-Electron Hamiltonian

Why is a E&M nature of light not sufficient to explain experiments?

DVCS and extraction of cross sections in Hall A

EXST Regression Techniques Page 1

0 +1e Radionuclides - can spontaneously emit particles and radiation which can be expressed by a nuclear equation.

A Propagating Wave Packet Group Velocity Dispersion

Neutrino Probes of Dark Energy and Dark Matter

Lecture 19: Free Energies in Modern Computational Statistical Thermodynamics: WHAM and Related Methods

Chapter 7b Electron Spin and Spin- Orbit Coupling

SCALING OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION WITH MULTIPOLE ORDER. J. C. Sprott

de/dx Effectively all charged particles except electrons

Gamma-ray burst spectral evolution in the internal shock model

Chapter 10. The singular integral Introducing S(n) and J(n)

Precision Standard Model Tests (at JLab)

Chemical Physics II. More Stat. Thermo Kinetics Protein Folding...

Title: Vibrational structure of electronic transition

PHYSICS 2150 EXPERIMENTAL MODERN PHYSICS. Lecture 3 Statistical vs. Systematic Errors,Rejection of Data; Weighted Averages

Davisson Germer experiment

Fourier Transforms and the Wave Equation. Key Mathematics: More Fourier transform theory, especially as applied to solving the wave equation.

2008 AP Calculus BC Multiple Choice Exam

APP-IV Introduction to Astro-Particle Physics. Maarten de Jong

September 23, Honors Chem Atomic structure.notebook. Atomic Structure

1.2 Faraday s law A changing magnetic field induces an electric field. Their relation is given by:

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 21 May 1998

Radiation Physics Laboratory - Complementary Exercise Set MeBiom 2016/2017

1 Isoparametric Concept

Neutrino Mass and Forbidden Beta Decays

ECE507 - Plasma Physics and Applications

BETA DECAY VISUAL PHYSICS ONLINE

26-Sep-16. Nuclear energy production. Nuclear energy production. Nuclear energy production. Nuclear energy production

Extraction of Doping Density Distributions from C-V Curves

Classical Magnetic Dipole

CE 530 Molecular Simulation

Introduction to Condensed Matter Physics

Lecture 2. Interaction of Radiation with Matter

IV. e + e annihilation experiments 1. Experimental methods Discovery of the Tau-Lepton 5. hadrons 6. Hadronic resonances

Chapter 13 GMM for Linear Factor Models in Discount Factor form. GMM on the pricing errors gives a crosssectional

ECE 650 1/8. Homework Set 4 - Solutions

Chapter 1 Late 1800 s Several failures of classical (Newtonian) physics discovered

Deepak Rajput

Data Assimilation 1. Alan O Neill National Centre for Earth Observation UK

Interaction of particles with matter

Properties of Quarks ( ) Isospin. π = 1, 1

Search sequence databases 3 10/25/2016

Problem Set #2 Due: Friday April 20, 2018 at 5 PM.

HYSTERESIS AND BLEACHING OF ABSORPTION BY ELECTRONS ON HELIUM

Introduction to the quantum theory of matter and Schrödinger s equation

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 12: Jan 28 th 2004

The Matrix Exponential

10. The Discrete-Time Fourier Transform (DTFT)

VII. Quantum Entanglement

Γ W. (GeV) 3. τ e universality in W decays

Module 8 Non equilibrium Thermodynamics

LEP Higgs Search Results. Chris Tully Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop January 21-26, 2002

The Matrix Exponential

Davisson Germer experiment Announcements:

Exchange rates in the long run (Purchasing Power Parity: PPP)

Nuclear reactions The chain reaction

Magnetic Neutron Scattering and Spin-Polarized Neutrons

Bifurcation Theory. , a stationary point, depends on the value of α. At certain values

Low-energy QED tests (and what we can learn from them)

HERA - Structure of Matter and QCD

Today. Wave-Matter Duality. Quantum Non-Locality. What is waving for matter waves?

Pair (and Triplet) Production Effect:

Self-interaction mass formula that relates all leptons and quarks to the electron

Pion condensation with neutrinos

Inference Methods for Stochastic Volatility Models

Chapter 8: Electron Configurations and Periodicity

Transcription:

Impact paramtr analysis in + N + pi+ N 1 Paul Hoyr Univrsity of Hlsinki INT Workshop Novmbr 14-18, 2016 Rlativistic lctron microscopy of hadron dynamics Gold atoms: 3D Th pion: 2D 8 ρπ(b) 6 ρ π (b) [fm -2 ] 4 2 1 www.york.ac.uk/nanocntr /facilitis/ftm/ 0-1 0 b x [fm] 1-1 0 b y [fm] Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Millr, Strikman, Wiss, arxiv 1011.1472

Procss dpndnc of transvrs siz 2 How dos th targt charg distribution dpnd on th proprtis of th final stat? Paul Hoyr INT 2016 PH and S. Kurki arxiv:1101.4810

Compar: Color Transparncy in A ρ X 3 Q 2 Paul Hoyr INT 2016 lf = 2ν/Δmh 2 formation lngth

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Elctron microscopy of rlativistic chargs 4 Light quarks in hadrons mov with v c = 1 : How can w gt a sharp pictur using probs moving with th sam spd? In a fram whr ph z + (IMF or LF), th quark nrgy Eq = x Eh, hnc v q? = p q? xe h! 0 Th lctron can rsolv th transvrs positions of th quarks with arbitrary accuracy in hard collisions (Q ) In h X whr th lctron p z it scattrs from all targt quarks at qual Light-Front (LF) tim x + = t+z t=t z= t t=0 z=0 Th transvrs structur of h can b masurd at qual Light-Front tim x +

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 DIS: larg Q 2 rsolvs singl quarks 5 At low Q 2 th γ* may intract with diffrnt quarks in T and T*: N q T γ* γ* T* N Such contributions do not rflct th proprtis of a singl quark. Bj limit: q 0 = ν and Q 2, with x Bj = Q2 2m h N T Q 2 r At larg Q 2 th γ* is cohrnt on a singl quark Vrifid by scaling in Q 2 (up to log s) fixd Th quark can b at any r in th targt.

Impact paramtr distributions via th GPD s 6 Z d 2? (2 ) 2 ib? GPD(?) dtrmins th transvrs position b of th struck quark x N GPD N x Sopr (1977) Burkardt (2000) Dihl (2002) (P +, Δ /2) (P +, Δ /2) Δ f q/n (x, b) = n, i,k i=1 n dx i 4 d 2 b i 1 i x i 1 4 2 x i b i (2) (b b k ) (x x k ) n (x i, b i, i ) 2 Cntr of momntum at th origin LF wav function i Not: * b is conjugat to th (finit) nuclon momntum transfr Δ, not to th momntum transfr (Q ) in th hard collision q q * Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Th 2-dimnsional FT must b don in a fram whr Δ + = 0

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 In N N th lctron and nuclon momntum transfrs ar th sam: q = Δ Nuclon Form Factors γ* q = Δ 7 Th γ* coupls to a singl quark in th form factor (amplitud, not σ!) A 2-dim. FT ovr q will giv th distribution of th struck quark in b N F1, F2 N (P +, Δ /2) (P +, Δ /2) Δ Not: * Th γ*(q ) scattrs cohrntly ovr quarks within Δb 1/q, and thus masurs charg with this rsolution. * A FT ovr < q < givs th b-distribution with δ-function accuracy.

Nuclon Charg Distribution from N N 8 0 (b) = 1 2p + Z d 2 q (2 ) 2 iq b p +, 1 2 q, J + (0) p +, 1 2 q, = 0 dq 2 QJ 0(bQ)F 1 (Q 2 ) 0 (b) = n, i,k k n i=1 dx i 4 d 2 b i (1 i x i ) 1 4 (2) ( i x i b i ) (2) (b b k ) n (x i, b i, i ) 2 bx Complmntary to pdf s, but no factorization, hnc no univrsality. Nutron charg distribution vs. b + by Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Millr (2007) Carlson and Vandrhaghn (2008)

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Byond lastic form factors 9 Th xprssion of ρ0(b) in trms of LC wav functions, 0 (b) = 1 2p + Z d 2 q (2 ) 2 iq b p +, 1 2 q, J + (0) p +, 1 2 q, is basd on th Fock xpansion of th initial and final stats: n 1 P + dx i d 2 k i, P, x + =0 = xi 16 3 16 3 (1 x i ) (2) ( n, i i=1 0 i i k i ) n (x i, k i, i) n; x i P +,x i P + k i, i x+ =0 Any stat f is dfind by its LF wav functions Th b-spac analysis applis similarly for any final stat f : hf J + (0) Ni By comparing th b-distributions for various stats f on larns about th raction dynamics. f n(x i, k i, i)

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Byond lastic form factors 10 Th b-distribution of th struck quark in N f is givn by: A fn (b) = 1 4 n n i=1 1 0 dx i 4 d 2 b i (1 x i ) 2 ( i i x i b i ) ) n f (xi, b i ) n N (x i, b i ) k k 2 (b k b) Th xprssion is diagonal in th Fock stats n, and f n N n Th γ* both causs th transition N f and masurs th contributing Fock stats f = N* : Transition form factors: N N*

Comparison of N* transition form factors 11 N(1440)1/2 + b 2 ρ T b y (fm) Elctric Dipol N*(1440) ρ 0 ρ T charg dnsi<s b 2 ρ T N(1535)1/2 - b y (fm) Elctric Dipol N*(1535) ρ 0 ρ T CLAS data V. D. Burkrt arxiv:1610.00400 Paul Hoyr INT 2016

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Connction to Color Transparncy 12 Brodsky, and Mullr (1988) Hard procsss ar xpctd to involv transvrsally compact Fock stats Masur thir siz via rscattring in nucli Exampl: A ρ X π π X CLAS Collaboration arxiv:1201.2735 Expct th transvrs siz of th qq cratd by th γ*(q 2 ) to dcras as Q 2 grows. A lf Tst by masuring th absorption of th th qq in th targt nuclus A. Choos kinmatics: Th γ* cohrnc lngth lc is short (< 1 fm) Th ρ formation lngth lf is long (> 1fm)

Evidnc for color Transparncy 13 lc (fm) A Paul Hoyr INT 2016 CLAS Collaboration arxiv:1201.2735

Hard scal from th final stat 14 In th CLAS xprimnt, th virtuality Q 2 of th γ* gav th hard scal, and σ(a) rflctd th siz of th qq which (latr) formd into th ρ. W may also considr A π π X at low Q 2, whr th rlativ k of th pions provids th hard scal. This is analogous to th E791 masurmnt of xclusiv dijt production π A jt jt A : Th rlativ k of th jts provids th hard scal. 500 GV π q k > 1.25 GV At low q th scattring is cohrnt on th nuclar targt A =Pt. E791 Collaboration hp-x/0010044 Us σ(a) to masur th siz of th qq which crats th jts.

π 500 GV σ(π A jt jt A) A α Fig. 4. Th Frmilab E791 di-jt yild from carbon and platinum as a function of th squar E791 Collaboration yilds shown ar for 1.5 appl k t appl 2.0 GV. Th curvs ar Mont Carlo simulations of th shows incohrnt dissociation, th background is shown by hp-x/0010044 th dot-dashd lin and th to Sourc: From Rf. [26]. α 1.5 E791 15 q q 2 < 0.015 GV 2 2/3 Data Thory Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Fig. 5. Th valus of obtaind from paramtrization of th E791 di-jt cross sction as = 0 A. Th data ar show quadratur sum of statistical and systmatic rrors and th k T bin siz. Th blu dashd lins ar th CT prdictions of Rf. [ α 1.5 indicats obsrvd inthat cohrnt th inlastic nuclus diffractiv pion nuclus is transparnt intractions. Typical to th virtualitis compact Q 2 = 4k 2 t qq Fock stats of th pion, slctd by k > 1.25 GV. ar also shown. incohrntly from nuclar targts, and th background. Th shaps of ths distributions ar calcu simulations as shownfig. in 5. Fig. Th 4 for valus transvrs of obtaind momntum, from paramtrization 1.5 appl k t of applth 2.0 E791 GV. di-jt Th cross pr-nuclo sction as production is paramtrizd quadratur as sum = of 0 statistical A, whr and 0 systmatic is th fr rrors cross andsction. th k T bin Th siz. valus Th blu of dashd th xpon lin xprimnt E791 ar shown obsrvdininfig. cohrnt 5 along inlastic withdiffractiv th CT prdictions pion nuclus of intractions. [16]. This is Typical to bvirtualitis compardq w 2

σ( N π N) 16 Rplac A : Lt th photon masur th transvrs siz, b(k ) π π N b k 500 GV q (12 GV) γ* q q 2 > 0 N q 2 < 0.015 GV 2 Not: * Th photon masurs th siz of th nuclon Fock stats at x + = 0 Th asymptotic πn stat mrgs from ths Fock stats as x + * Thr is no issu of cohrnc or formation lngths.

Comparison with th transition form factor 17 q 2 > 0 γ* q q 2 > 0 γ* q π(p1) N N*(p+q) N(p) b b k N(p2) p1 + p2 = p + q is not sufficint to fix p1(q) and p2(q) sparatly Th N and N* wav functions ar indpndnt of LF tim x + Th π N stat dvlops from th Fock stats masurd at x + = 0 Th N N* amplitud is ral, whras N π N has dynamical phass du to th πn intractions in th final stat.

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 FT of γ* matrix lmnt in momntum spac 18 In th fram: p = (p +,p, 1 2 q) w hav q = (0 +,q, q) p f = (p +,p + q, 1 2 q) d 2 q (2 ) 2 iq b 1 2p + f(p f ) J + (0) N(p) = A fn (b) p N l + q f pf A fn (b) = 1 4 n 1 n i=1 0 dx i 4 d 2 b i (1 x i ) 2 ( i i x i b i ) ) n f (xi, b i ) n N (x i, b i ) k k 2 (b k b)

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Exampl: f = π (p 1 ) N(p 2 ) In ordr to conform with th Lorntz covarianc of LF stats, at any pf : 1 N(p + f, p f ; f dx d 2 k ) f 0 x(1 x) 16 3 (x, k) (p 1 )N(p 2 ) whr Ψ f (x,k) dfins th final stat in trms of th rlativ variabls x, k : 19 p + 1 = xp+ f p 1 = xp f + k p + 2 =(1 x)p+ f p 2 =(1 x)p f k With x, k bing indpndnt of pf, our choic of Ψ f (x,k) dfins th pion and nuclon momnta p1, p2 at all photon momnta q.

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 QED illustration: + γ* + µ + µ 20 Th targt is a virtual photon γ*(p). Th Fourir transform of A µµ, 1, 2 = 1 µ (p1 2p +, 1)µ + (p 2, 2) J + (0) (p, )i givs, dnoting m = mµ and M 2 = m 2 x(1-x) p 2, A µµ,+1 (b; x, k) = + 1 2 + 1 2 p m appl p Mb K0 x(1 x) 1 x 2 (1 x) 2 xp i k b 1 x K0 Mb x x 2 xp +i k b x This agrs with th gnral xprssion in trms of th LF wav functions. γ*(p) γ*(q) µ + (p1) + µ (p2)

+ γ* + µ + µ xampl (1) Avrag Impact paramtr vs. x: m and k dpndnc 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 b 3 hb 2 i k = 5.0 1.5 p 2 = 0 0 m = 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 m = 2 x 161010_impact.nb

+ γ* + µ + µ xampl (2) Avrag Impact paramtr vs. x: p 2 dpndnc 0.6 0.4 0.2 b 3 hb 2 i m = 1 k = 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 p 2 = +3m 2 p 2 = 0 p 2 = 3m 2 x 161010_impact.nb

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Fourir transform of th cross sction 23 Th γ*+n f amplituds hav dynamical phass (rsonancs,...). Calculating thir Fourir transforms rquirs an amplitud analysis. On can also Fourir transform th masurd cross sction itslf. Thn th b-distribution rflcts th diffrnc btwn th impact paramtrs of th photon vrtx in th amplitud and its complx conjugat: d 2 q (2 ) 2 iq b 1 2p + f(p f ) J + (0) N(p) 2 = d 2 b q A fn (b q ) A fn(b q b) A narrowing of AfN(bq) as a function of th final stat f will b rflctd in th convolution.

+ γ* + µ + µ xampl (3) Avrag Impact paramtr from cross sction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 hbi S m = 1, p 2 = 0 m = 2, p 2 = 0 k = 0 m = 1, p 2 = 5m 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 x Non-flip amplitud, b 4 momnt, normalizd to S(b=0), to powr 1/6. 161010_impact.nb

Exampl: γ (*) + D p + n at 90 Th 90 brak-up cross sction at q 2 =0 agrs with dimnsional scaling for Eγ > 1 GV. σ(γd pn) E 22 E 22 CM dσ(γd pn) / kb GV dt C. Bochna t al, PRL 81 (1998) 4576 20 25 Dos this man that only compact configurations of th dutron, with R < 0.2 fm, contribut to this procss? E (GV) γ If so, xpct no q 2 -dpndnc for q 2 < 1 GV 2. With lctroproduction data R could b masurd:

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Many othr procsss within rach 26 Multiparticl final stats Havir flavors γ*n ππn, γ*n KΛ, K*Λ γ*n DΛc, Nuclar targts

Paul Hoyr INT 2016 Summary 27 Th q -dpndnc of th virtual photon masurs th charg distribution in transvrs spac. Th charg dnsity is masurd at an instant of Light-Front tim x + = t + z Unlik pdf s, no lading twist limit is implid: All Q 2 ar usful Th dnsity can b dtrmind for any initial and final stat: γ*a f Comparisons of b-distributions in diffrnt procsss giv insights into th scattring dynamics in transvrs spac. Modl indpndnt analysis Rady to b trid out with Jlab data!