Natural Event Documentation

Similar documents
Natural Event Documentation

APPENDIX G-7 METEROLOGICAL DATA

Natural Event Documentation

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Wind Report. Robinson, Smith & Walsh. John Smith REFERENCE:

Issued by: National Weather Service San Joaquin Valley - Hanford CA. Issue time: 409 AM PST Wed Jan

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Wind Report. Robinson, Smith & Walsh. John Smith. July 1, 2017 REFERENCE: 1 Maple Street, Houston, TX 77034

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary November 2006

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary July 2013

Addendum to the. Submitted to U.S. EPA Region 9 March 17, Prepared by:

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA Monthly Summary September 2016

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Air Assessment Section March 17, 2005

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIRSHED

Who is polluting the Columbia River Gorge?

The Climate of Marshall County

The Climate of Bryan County

The Climate of Texas County

The Climate of Pontotoc County

MxVision WeatherSentry Web Services Content Guide

The Climate of Payne County

The Climate of Seminole County

The CANSAC/BLUESKY Connection

CIMIS. California Irrigation Management Information System

The Climate of Grady County

Format of CLIGEN weather station statistics input files. for CLIGEN versions as of 6/2001 (D.C. Flanagan).

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Murray County

The Climate of Haskell County

J4.2 ASSESSMENT OF PM TRANSPORT PATTERNS USING ADVANCED CLUSTERING METHODS AND SIMULATIONS AROUND THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CA 3.

MPCA Forecasting Summary 2010

APPENDIX 3.6-A Support Information for Newcastle, Wyoming Meteorological Monitoring Site

P2.9 Use of the NOAA ARL HYSPLIT Trajectory Model For the Short Range Prediction of Stratus and Fog

MARINE WEATHER HINDCAST REPORT

Weather Station: WH_500_Series. Battery Voltage

Technical Support Document For the Alamosa Exceptional Events Occurring on April 8, 2013, April 23, 2013, May 1, 2013 and May 31, 2013

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH & CLIMATE SCIENCES SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY. Metr Fall 2014 Test #1 September 30, 2014

Accomplishments and Deliverables

Colorado CoCoRaHS. Colorado CoCoRaHS. December 2013 Volume 1, Issue 8 NOVEMBER PRECIPITATION NOVEMBER TEMPERATURES

Memorandum. Air Sampling

DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY. Metr Fall 2012 Test #1 200 pts. Part I. Surface Chart Interpretation.

Colorado Alpine Dust Deposition and Associated Continental Winds 1

Yucca Mountain climate: Past, present, and future

RSMC WASHINGTON USER'S INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT MODEL OUTPUTS

Northavimet. User Guide. New LLF

May 2017 Weather Summary P a g e 1 Alexander, P.J. & Power, S.

Urban Forest Effects-Dry Deposition (UFORE D) Model Enhancements. Satoshi Hirabayashi

Electronic Station Data Definitions

MACIS documentation. a. Temporal resolution: For each month and the hole year

Impacts of Spring versus Winter Lake Eyre Dust Storms

February 2011: A Month of Below Average Temperatures, A Record Cold Snap, and a Sharp Frontal Passage with Snow

Development of Operational Air Quality MM5-MOS Equations for the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

Table 1-2. TMY3 data header (line 2) 1-68 Data field name and units (abbreviation or mnemonic)

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

CASE STUDY OF THE NOVEMBER WINDSTORM IN SOUTH CENTRAL COLORADO

Conceptual Model for Ozone in the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Implementation of SWAN model with COSMO-CLM and WRF-ARW wind forcing for the Barents Sea storm events (case study).

Dependence of Air Quality on Meteorological Parameters in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Technical Support Document For the April 3, 2011, Alamosa and Lamar Exceptional Event

CAMARGO RANCH, llc. CRAIG BUFORD BufordResources.com

Use of the ALOHA source term model to enhance the NOAA HYSPLIT atmospheric dispersion model

FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ (July/August 2014) in perspective of multi-year ozone analysis

Trend of dust storm days and variation in dust and carbon monoxide concentrations during dust storms observed at Cheongwon, Korea

Modeling Radiological Consequences of Sever Accidents in BWRs: Review of Models Development, Verification and Validation

Regional Haze Metrics Trends and HYSPLIT Trajectory Analyses. May 2017

SAMPLE. SITE SPECIFIC WEATHER ANALYSIS Rainfall Report. Bevens Engineering, Inc. Susan M. Benedict REFERENCE:

WIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven

Forecasting of Optical Turbulence in Support of Realtime Optical Imaging and Communication Systems

Homework 2: Hurricane Katrina. Part 1. Hurricane Katrina, August 28, 2005 Satellite Imagery

Central Ohio Air Quality End of Season Report. 111 Liberty Street, Suite 100 Columbus, OH Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission

Determining correction factors for seasonal and regional variability in

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH & CLIMATE SCIENCES Name SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Nov 29, ERTH 360 Test #2 200 pts

Use of the NOAA ARL HYSPLIT Trajectory Model For the Short Range Prediction of Coastal Stratus and Fog

Chapter 3. Materials and Methods

Using Smoke Modeling Tools for Prescribed Fire Planning and Implementation A Quick Set of Instructions (Revised October 2015)

Unit: Weather Study Guide

IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. [Insert Picture Here]

Comparing Modal and Sectional Approaches in Modeling Particulate Matter in Northern California

Evaluation of Small Sensors for Detection of Dust at Cuyama Valley High School

WEATHER FORECAST DHAKA

Quality Control of the National RAWS Database for FPA Timothy J Brown Beth L Hall

Overview of U.S. Forecasting/Outreach Methods

WEATHER FORECAST DHAKA

Page 1. Name:

Role of Meteorology on Urban Air Pollution Dispersion: A 20yr Analysis for Delhi, India

Preliminary Conceptual Model Development

Weather vs. Climate. Tucson NWS homepage:

Fort Lewis, Washington (47 05'N, 'W)

Significant Rainfall and Peak Sustained Wind Estimates For Downtown San Francisco

PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUTOFF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Module 11: Meteorology Topic 5 Content: Weather Maps Notes

ERTH 365 Homework #2: Hurricane Harvey. 100 points

Impacts of Wildfires on Particulate Matter in Pima County, Arizona

IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. [Insert Picture Here]

Department of Meteorology University of Nairobi. Laboratory Manual. Micrometeorology and Air pollution SMR 407. Prof. Nzioka John Muthama

NATS 101 Section 13: Lecture 3. Weather vs. Climate

Definitions Weather and Climate Climates of NYS Weather Climate 2012 Characteristics of Climate Regions of NYS NYS s Climates 1.

The lesson essential questions that will guide our investigations are:

Accessing and Using National Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Climate and Hydrology Data from ClimDB and HydroDB: A Tutorial

Case Study Las Vegas, Nevada By: Susan Farkas Chika Nakazawa Simona Tamutyte Zhi-ya Wu AAE/AAL 330 Design with Climate

IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. [Insert Pic]

RSMC WASHINGTON USER'S INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT MODEL OUTPUTS

Transcription:

ADDENDUM Natural Event Documentation Corcoran, Oildale and Bakersfield, California September 22, 2006 San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District May 23, 2007 Natural Event Documentation

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District May 23, 2007 San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue Fresno, California 93726 (559) 230-5800 www.valleyair.org Natural Event Document

TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables...4 1. Summary...5 2. Particulate Transport from Corcoran to Bakersfield...7 3. Evidence of Dust Entrainment between Corcoran and Bakersfield...13 4. Evidence of Unusual Nature of the Natural Event...14 5. References...16 6. Appendix...17 6.1 Wind data for the Alpaugh CIMIS station on September 22, 2006...17 6.2 Wind data for Bakersfield-Meadows Airport on September 22, 2006...18 3

LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure A-1. Map showing area of the wind blown dust analysis...6 Figure A-2. September 22, 2006 hourly PM10 concentrations at Bakersfield - Golden State and sustained 10 minute averaged wind speed at Bakersfield - Meadows...7 Figure A-3. Streamlines for Hour 10 on September 22, 2006....9 Figure A-4. NOAA HYSPLIT airflow simulation for air parcels that arrived in Bakersfield between 2 pm and 10 pm PST are shown for (a) 4:00 am PST, (b) 7:00 am PST, (c) 10:00 am PST and (d) 2:00 pm PST. Dots on the images indicate air parcel movement, not particulate concentration.11 Figure A-5. Maximum daily PM10 concentrations at Corcoran, Bakersfield and Oildale for September....14 Figure A-6. Corcoran PM10 vs. Maximum Hourly Wind Speed on Monitored Days During September 2001 through 2006...15 Table A-1. September 22, 2006 PM10 data for Corcoran and Bakersfield, and relevant wind data...8 4

1. SUMMARY This document is an addendum to the September 22, 2006 Natural Event Documentation for Corcoran, Oildale and Bakersfield, CA submitted to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on April 5, 2007. The purpose of this addendum is to provide additional analysis to demonstrate that: The dust cloud that reached Corcoran during the morning of September 22, 2006 was transported to Oildale/Bakersfield; and As the dust cloud moved southeast from Corcoran, additional PM10 was entrained by high winds and transported to Oildale/Bakersfield. Section 2 presents data to show that wind speeds and directions were sufficient to transport the dust cloud that affected Corcoran to Bakersfield by the early afternoon. Section 3 demonstrates that winds between Corcoran and Bakersfield were sufficient to entrain more geologic dust that was later deposited in Bakersfield. Section 4 demonstrates the infrequency of September coarse fraction PM episodes in the Southern San Joaquin Valley, and assesses the correlation between regional wind speeds and PM concentrations. Figure A-1 is a map showing area of wind blown dust analysis and includes the towns of Corcoran, Alpaugh, Oildale and Bakersfield. 5

Figure A-1. Map showing area of the wind blown dust analysis. 6

2. PARTICULATE TRANSPORT FROM CORCORAN TO BAKERSFIELD This discussion will show that wind speeds were sufficient to transport the dust plume peak from Corcoran to Bakersfield. To transport the plume peak 55 miles from Corcoran to Oildale and Bakersfield in five hours, the wind speed would need to average at least 11 miles per hour. The five-hour average wind speed at Alpaugh, which is between Corcoran and Bakersfield, was 11.5 mph for the five-hour period from hour 10 to hour 14. Figure A-2 and Table A-1 demonstrates that the plume peak arrived in Bakersfield by hour 15. 350 Bakersfield PM10 ug/m3 Bakersfield Wind MPH September 22, 2006 16 300 14 PM10 Concentration ug/m3 250 200 150 100 50 12 10 8 6 4 2 Wind Speed (mph) 0 1:00 3:00 5:00 7:00 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00 21:00 23:00 0 Time Wind speed is a 10 minute average at the top of the hour, peak gusts are higher than 10 minute averaged data. Figure A-2. September 22, 2006 hourly PM10 concentrations at Bakersfield - Golden State and sustained 10 minute averaged wind speed at Bakersfield - Meadows. 7

Table A-1. September 22, 2006 PM10 data for Corcoran and Bakersfield, and relevant wind data. Hour Corcoran PM10 (μg/m 3 ) Alpaugh Hourly Averaged Wind Speed (mph) and Wind Direction at 2 meters AGL Bakersfield - Meadows Airport Wind Speed (mph) and Wind Direction at 10 meters AGL Bakersfield Golden St. PM10 (μg/m 3 ) Maricopa Wind Speed (mph) and Wind Direction at 10 meters AGL 0 63 3.7 SSE 3 WNW 92 6 WSW 1 39 3.1 SSE 6 NNW 89 6 WSW 2 51 2.8 SSE CALM 79 5 WSW 3 64 2.9 SE CALM 66 7 SW 4 55 3.4 SW 3 ESE 81 6 SW 5 78 4.4 W 5 ESE 81 6 SW 6 170 2.6 WSW 5 ESE 74 7 M15 WSW 7 306 7.7 NNW 6 ENE 104 17 M21 NW 8 519 15.2 NNW 3 NE 78 13 M23 NNW 9 531 12.1 NNW 14 NW 114 7 M13 NE 10 725 12.3 NNW 12 WNW 103 6 M11 ESE 11 695 12.8 NW 14 WNW 139 5 E 12 521 10.8 NW 10 G16 WNW 168 6 ENE 13 318 9.6 NW 9 G17 W 196 6 E 14 276 9.6 NW 7 WNW 239 6 ENE 15 247 8.1 NW 6 W 294 6 ENE 16 269 7.7 NNW 9 NW 285 7 ENE 17 283 4.4 NNW 9 NW 281 6 ENE 18 258 3.5 WSW 8 NW 270 4 SW 19 223 4.0 W 6 NNW 281 5 WSW 20 150 2.5 NNW 5 N 259 4 WSW 21 144 2.7 NW 6 NNE 221 5 WSW 22 138 3.1 W 7 NNE 236 5 WSW 23 144 2.6 SSE 3 NE 246 6 W Hour 0 is Midnight to 1 AM, Pacific Standard Time. Alpaugh wind data is from the California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) monitors. CIMIS wind speed is an hourly average sampled at 2 meters above ground level (AGL). Hourly averaged winds typically are much lower than peak gusts. Wind speed measured at 2 meters would typically be would be lower than wind speed measured at 10 meters at the same location. For Bakersfield Meadows: G = Hourly peak gust, sustained wind is a 10 minute average at beginning of hour. Weather data at Bakersfield Meadows was obtained through the http://www.met.utah.edu/mesowest/ website. Maricopa wind data is an hourly average. M denotes peak minute average for that hour. 8

Figure A-3 is a streamline analysis for hour 10 on September 22, 2006 showing strongest winds extending from the area north and west of Corcoran to Bakersfield. Sept. 22, 2006 10:00 am PST Red wind barbs: Surface observations Blue vectors: 3D Wind field interpolated from surface observations Analysis completed using National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center (NARAC) tools on the NARAC Web System Figure A-3. Streamlines for Hour 10 on September 22, 2006. 9

A computer simulation has been provided via email to CARB and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that shows that the dust cloud traveled from the Corcoran area to Bakersfield. A technical explanation of the computer simulation follows. The Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model was run for the natural event to identify the air parcel source regions that contributed to peak particulate concentrations in Bakersfield. HYSPLIT development is a joint effort between the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Australia s Bureau of Meteorology. This type of modeling is called particle dispersion modeling. The term particle refers to the method by which the air parcels are moved (not particulate concentration). The HYSPLIT model computes air parcel trajectories based on meteorological observation data files from the National Weather Service s Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). The model and full documentation are available at: http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html The HYSPLIT model was used to simulate the flow field for air parcels that arrived in Bakersfield between 2 PM and 10 PM PST, to identify the areas that contributed to peak particulate concentrations at Bakersfield. The animation indicates that the area north and west of Corcoran was the main source region for air arriving in Bakersfield during peak concentrations recorded from 2 PM to 10 PM PST. Still images from the animation are provided in Figure A-4. Dots on the images indicate air parcel movement, not particulate concentration. Figure A-4a shows that dust entrained by winds at 4 AM PST, just before Tracy s peak concentration, would have been able to travel to Bakersfield to contribute to peak concentrations. Figure A-4b shows the regions at 7 AM PST that are contributing to the Bakersfield peaks. The main source of this air mass is just northwest of Corcoran at a time when peak particulate concentrations are beginning to be observed at Corcoran. Figure A-4c shows the air mass at 10 AM PST in the vicinity of Corcoran during Corcoran's observed peak hour. Figure A-4d shows the air mass at 2 PM PST, as it arrives in Bakersfield for the beginning hour of Bakersfield concentrations exceeding 200 μg/m 3. 10

(a) (b) (c) (d) Figure A-4. NOAA HYSPLIT airflow simulation for air parcels that arrived in Bakersfield between 2 pm and 10 pm PST are shown for (a) 4:00 am PST, (b) 7:00 am PST, (c) 10:00 am PST and (d) 2:00 pm PST. Dots on the images indicate air parcel movement, not particulate concentration. 11

An animation of visual satellite images has been provided to CARB and EPA via email, which shows a cloud of particulate traveling across the San Joaquin Valley midday on September 22. This cloud of particulate had to be very significant to be visible in the satellite image. 12

3. EVIDENCE OF DUST ENTRAINMENT BETWEEN CORCORAN AND BAKERSFIELD The following discussion will demonstrate that winds between Corcoran and Bakersfield were sufficient to entrain dust into the atmosphere. The wind speed at Alpaugh, which is located between Corcoran and Bakersfield, is shown to be above the dust entrainment wind speed threshold. Dust entrainment threshold A report for the San Joaquin Air Quality Study Agency (Bush, 2004) concluded that wind speeds of 8 m/s (17.6 mph) recorded at 10 meters above ground level could be sufficient to entrain surface soil into the atmosphere. Variation in wind speed with height Over a flat surface with no obstructions and a well-mixed atmosphere, wind speed typically varies logarithmically with height above ground. This relationship can be modeled using the equation: V 1 / V 2 = (Z 1 / Z 2 ) p where: V = wind speed, Z = height above ground, p is approximately 0.143 for flat terrain and 0.4 for rough terrain, and the subscripts 1 and 2 denote two different sampling heights above ground level (AGL). In some weather conditions, this equation is not representative of the vertical wind structure. However, it is appropriate to use this equation for the strong wind conditions that occurred on September 22, 2006. Using this equation, the Alpaugh CIMIS station reported a peak hourly averaged wind speed of 15.2 mph at 2 meters AGL (see Table A-1 and CIMIS data in the appendix). Using the equation provided for flat terrain, the hourly averaged wind speed at 10 meters AGL would be 19.1 mph, as shown below. V 10 meters = V 2meters (Z 10 meters / Z 2 meters ) 0.143 V 10 meters = (15.2 mph) (10 meters/2 meters) 0.143 V 10 meters = 19.1 mph The wind speed at Alpaugh, which is located between Corcoran and Bakersfield, was above the dust entrainment wind speed threshold of 17.6 mph on September 22, 2006. The equation referenced above is found in a number of documents, including: California Department of Water Resources document, Wind in California, (Bulletin No. 185, January 1978), and An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology by Roland Stull, 1997 13

4. EVIDENCE OF UNUSUAL NATURE OF THE NATURAL EVENT. This section will demonstrate that the high PM10 concentrations are infrequent in September. Figure A-5 is a plot of maximum daily PM10 concentrations for Corcoran, Bakersfield and Oildale in September for years 2000 to 2006, which indicates that high PM10 concentrations reported on September 22, 2006 are unusual. 250 Maximum 24 hour PM10 for September 2004 Wind Event Flagged By EPA Concentration (ug/m3) 200 150 100 50 Corcoran Bakersfield Oildale NAAQS 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 YEAR Figure A-5. Maximum daily PM10 concentrations at Corcoran, Bakersfield and Oildale for September. Figure A-6 presents maximum hourly wind speed data on September PM10 monitoring days in the years 2001 through 2006. With the exception of the September 3, 2004 and September 22, 2006 high wind natural events, maximum hourly winds speeds in September were mostly between 4 to 8 miles per hour. This data demonstrates that PM10 exceedances on September 22, 2006 were unusual and the high PM10 was caused by high winds. 14

250 Corcoran PM10 vs. Maximum Hourly Wind Speed on Monitored Days During September 2001 Through 2006 September 3, 2004 Wind Event (EPA flagged data as a natural event on July 8, 2005) 217 215 FRM PM10 (micrograms / cubic meter) 200 150 100 50 September 22, 2006 Wind Event 0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 Maximum Hourly Wind Speed (mph) Figure A-6. Corcoran PM10 vs. Maximum Hourly Wind Speed on Monitored Days During September 2001 through 2006 15

5. REFERENCES California Department of Water Resources, Wind in California; Bulletin No. 185, January 1978 California Department of Water Resources, California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS), http://wwwcimis.water.ca.gov/cimis/welcome.jsp David Bush, T&B Systems Contribution to CRPAQS Initial Data Analysis of Field Program Measurements, Final Report Contract 2002-06PM Technical & Business Systems, Inc., November 9, 2004 http://www.arb.ca.gov/airways/crpaqs/da/final/tbfinaloverview.pdf Mesowest historical meteorological data, Mesowest, http://www.met.utah.edu/mesowest/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): ARL website, HYSPLIT model, http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/cmet.html National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): Weather data, http://www.weather.gov Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center (NARAC), NARAC Web System Roland Stull, An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, Page 376, Section 9.7 16

6. APPENDIX 6.1 Wind data for the Alpaugh CIMIS station on September 22, 2006 Date Hour ETo (in) Precip (in) Sol Rad Vapor (Ly/day) Pressure (mbars) Air Temp ( F) Rel Hum (%) Dew Point ( F) Wind Speed (MPH) Wind Dir (0-360) Soil Temp ( F) 09/22/2006 0100 0.00 0.00 0 10.4 56.0 68 45.5 3.7 161.8 74.0 0200 0.00 0.00 0 10.3 56.8 65 45.3 3.1 158.4 73.6 0300 0.00 0.00 0 10.0 55.9 66 44.6 2.8 155.6 73.1 0400 0.00 0.00 0 10.6 53.3 77 46.2 2.9 140.3 72.7 0500 0.00 0.00 0 9.8 53.9 69 44.0 3.4 235.8 72.2 0600 0.00 0.00 6 9.9 56.8 63 44.3 4.4 265.2 71.8 0700 0.00 0.00 184 9.9 59.5 57 44.2 2.6 253.1 71.4 0800 0.01 0.00 538 7.8 65.7 36 38.2 7.7 341.3 71.0 0900 0.02 0.00 886 7.1 68.6 30 35.8 15.2 339.3 70.8 1000 0.02 0.00 1160 7.2 70.7 28 36.0 12.1 338.4 71.0 1100 0.02 0.00 1371 7.0 72.6 26 35.3 12.3 327.9 71.8 1200 0.03 0.00 1474 6.7 75.1 23 34.3 12.8 321.2 73.0 1300 0.03 0.00 1485 6.6 77.7 20 34.1 10.8 314.5 74.2 1400 0.02 0.00 1352 6.3 79.7 18 32.7 9.6 321.0 75.5 1500 0.02 0.00 1119 6.0 80.7 17 31.4 9.6 315.8 76.5 1600 0.02 0.00 780 5.9 80.9 16 31.1 8.1 312.9 77.2 1700 0.01 0.00 397 6.7 80.3 19 34.3 7.7 332.3 77.3 1800 0.00 0.00 78 7.2 76.5 23 36.1 4.4 343.2 77.0 1900 0.00 0.00 0 8.5 70.1 34 40.4 3.5 257.2 76.5 2000 0.00 0.00 0 9.4 63.9 46 42.9 4.0 270.7 75.8 17

6.2 Wind data for Bakersfield-Meadows Airport on September 22, 2006 Time(PDT) Temperature Dew Wet Bulb Relative Wind Wind Wind Quality Pressure Sea level Altimeter 1500 m Weather Visibility Point Temperature Humidity Speed Gust Direction check pressure Pressure conditions F F F % mph mph in in in in miles 22:50 68.0 33.8 50.9 28 3 NE OK 29.25 29.77 29.79 24.86 clear 21:50 69.1 32.0 50.8 25 7 NNE OK 29.24 29.76 29.78 24.85 haze 8.00 20:50 71.1 32.0 51.7 24 6 NNE OK 29.22 29.75 29.76 24.83 haze 8.00 19:50 73.0 33.1 52.8 23 5 N OK 29.20 29.72 29.74 24.82 haze 5.00 18:50 75.0 36.0 54.5 24 6 NNW OK 29.19 29.71 29.73 24.81 haze 5.00 17:50 79.0 35.1 55.8 20 8 NW OK 29.17 29.69 29.71 24.79 haze 5.00 16:50 80.1 32.0 55.4 17 9 NW OK 29.17 29.69 29.71 24.79 haze 5.00 15:50 80.1 32.0 55.4 17 9 NW OK 29.17 29.70 29.71 24.79 haze 5.00 14:50 79.0 34.0 55.5 20 6 W OK 29.19 29.72 29.73 24.81 haze 5.00 13:50 78.1 33.1 54.9 19 7 WNW OK 29.21 29.73 29.75 24.83 haze 6.00 12:50 75.9 33.1 54.0 21 9 17 W OK 29.23 29.75 29.77 24.84 clear 9.00 11:50 73.9 33.1 53.2 22 10 16 WNW OK 29.24 29.76 29.78 24.85 clear 10.00 10:50 73.0 36.0 53.7 26 14 WNW OK 29.24 29.76 29.78 24.85 clear 10.00 9:50 71.1 39.0 54.0 31 12 WNW OK 29.22 29.75 29.76 24.83 clear 10.00 8:50 70.0 42.1 54.7 36 14 NW OK 29.20 29.73 29.74 24.82 clear 10.00 7:50 69.1 41.0 53.9 36 3 NE OK 29.18 29.70 29.72 24.80 clear 9.00 6:50 64.9 41.0 52.2 42 6 ENE OK 29.15 29.68 29.69 24.78 clear 9.00 5:50 64.9 42.1 52.6 43 5 ESE OK 29.15 29.67 29.69 24.78 clear 10.00 4:50 63.0 42.1 51.8 46 5 ESE OK 29.15 29.67 29.69 24.78 clear 10.00 3:50 64.9 42.1 52.6 43 3 ESE OK 29.16 29.68 29.70 24.78 clear 10.00 2:50 66.0 43.0 53.4 43 0 OK 29.17 29.70 29.71 24.79 clear 10.00 18