Calculation of fission product decay heat

Similar documents
Radioactivity in the Risø District July-December 2013

Radioactivity in the Risø District January-June 2014

A Note on Powers in Finite Fields

On the Einstein-Stern model of rotational heat capacities

Reducing Uncertainty of Near-shore wind resource Estimates (RUNE) using wind lidars and mesoscale models

Kommerciel arbejde med WAsP

Modelling Salmonella transfer during grinding of meat

Exposure Buildup Factors for Heavy Metal Oxide Glass: A Radiation Shield

Accelerating interior point methods with GPUs for smart grid systems

An Equivalent Source Method for Modelling the Lithospheric Magnetic Field Using Satellite and Airborne Magnetic Data

The dipole moment of a wall-charged void in a bulk dielectric

Feasibility of non-linear simulation for Field II using an angular spectrum approach

On numerical evaluation of two-dimensional phase integrals

Neutronics calculations for the ITER Collective Thomson Scattering Diagnostics

Determination of the minimum size of a statistical representative volume element from a fibre-reinforced composite based on point pattern statistics

Dynamic Effects of Diabatization in Distillation Columns

Optimizing Reliability using BECAS - an Open-Source Cross Section Analysis Tool

Numerical modeling of the conduction and radiation heating in precision glass moulding

Lidar calibration What s the problem?

Chapter IV: Radioactive decay

Prediction of airfoil performance at high Reynolds numbers.

Sound absorption properties of a perforated plate and membrane ceiling element Nilsson, Anders C.; Rasmussen, Birgit

PHYSICS A2 UNIT 2 SECTION 1: RADIOACTIVITY & NUCLEAR ENERGY

Aalborg Universitet. Lecture 14 - Introduction to experimental work Kramer, Morten Mejlhede. Publication date: 2015

Citation (APA): Holm, E., Frøsig, L., & Sidhu, R. (Eds.) (2006). Theory of sampling. (NKS-122).

Radiometric Measurements of Environmental Radioactivity Beta Counting, Alpha and Gamma Spectrometry

Validation of Boundary Layer Winds from WRF Mesoscale Forecasts over Denmark

Matrix representation of a Neural Network

Validation and comparison of numerical wind atlas methods: the South African example

A comparison study of the two-bladed partial pitch turbine during normal operation and an extreme gust conditions

Solar radiation and thermal performance of solar collectors for Denmark

Nuclear fission is used in nuclear power stations to generate electricity. Nuclear fusion happens naturally in stars.

A Trust-region-based Sequential Quadratic Programming Algorithm

Multiple Scenario Inversion of Reflection Seismic Prestack Data

Year 11 Physics booklet Topic 1 Atomic structure and radioactivity Name:

Physics 3204 UNIT 3 Test Matter Energy Interface

Design of Robust AMB Controllers for Rotors Subjected to Varying and Uncertain Seal Forces

Steady State Comparisons HAWC2 v12.2 vs HAWCStab2 v2.12

Global Wind Atlas validation and uncertainty

There are 82 protons in a lead nucleus. Why doesn t the lead nucleus burst apart?

Generating the optimal magnetic field for magnetic refrigeration

The Wien Bridge Oscillator Family

The colpitts oscillator family

Application of the MCNPX-McStas interface for shielding calculations and guide design at ESS

The number of protons in the nucleus is known as the atomic number Z, and determines the chemical properties of the element.

Berøringsløs optisk måling af gassammensætning ved UV og IR spektroskopi

A note on non-periodic tilings of the plane

Phase Equilibrium in Amino Acid Salt Systems for CO2 Capture

Simulating wind energy resources with mesoscale models: Intercomparison of stateof-the-art

HOMEWORK 22-1 (pp )

Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

A Blue Lagoon Function

Introduction to Nuclear Science

Aalborg Universitet. Land-use modelling by cellular automata Hansen, Henning Sten. Published in: NORDGI : Nordic Geographic Information

Chapter Three (Nuclear Radiation)

On a set of diophantine equations

Conceptual design of a thorium supplied thermal molten salt wasteburner

Design possibilities for impact noise insulation in lightweight floors A parameter study

Radioactivity. Radioactivity

Optimal acid digestion for multi-element analysis of different waste matrices

Chapter 30 Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity

Impact of the interfaces for wind and wave modeling - interpretation using COAWST, SAR and point measurements

Nuclear Fission. Q for 238 U + n 239 U is 4.??? MeV. E A for 239 U 6.6 MeV MeV neutrons are needed.

Chemistry 201: General Chemistry II - Lecture

Plane Wave Medical Ultrasound Imaging Using Adaptive Beamforming

Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Physics

Geometry of power flows and convex-relaxed power flows in distribution networks with high penetration of renewables

Reflection of sound from finite-size plane and curved surfaces

Aalborg Universitet. The number of independent sets in unicyclic graphs Pedersen, Anders Sune; Vestergaard, Preben Dahl. Publication date: 2005

Nuclear Spectroscopy: Radioactivity and Half Life

Estimation of Peak Wave Stresses in Slender Complex Concrete Armor Units

Graphs with given diameter maximizing the spectral radius van Dam, Edwin

Nuclear Physics (13 th lecture)

Measurements of the angular distribution of diffuse irradiance

Room Allocation Optimisation at the Technical University of Denmark

Chapter 12: Nuclear Reaction

Vindkraftmeteorologi - metoder, målinger og data, kort, WAsP, WaSPEngineering,

Reflection and absorption coefficients for use in room acoustic simulations

Quiz, Physics & Chemistry

Some nuclei are unstable Become stable by ejecting excess energy and often a particle in the process Types of radiation particle - particle

Atomic and Nuclear Radii

Single Shooting and ESDIRK Methods for adjoint-based optimization of an oil reservoir

Potential solution for rain erosion of wind turbine blades

Nuclear Physics for Applications

Karlsruhe Nuclide Chart

Multi (building)physics modeling

Homework 06. Nuclear

Nuclear Reactions A Z. Radioactivity, Spontaneous Decay: Nuclear Reaction, Induced Process: x + X Y + y + Q Q > 0. Exothermic Endothermic

turbine (a) (i) Which part of the power station provides thermal (heat) energy from a chain reaction?

A Procedure for Classification of Cup-Anemometers

B. Rouben McMaster University Course EP 4D03/6D03 Nuclear Reactor Analysis (Reactor Physics) 2015 Sept.-Dec.

ZX or X-A where X is chemical symbol of element. common unit: [unified mass unit = u] also known as [atomic mass unit = amu] or [Dalton = Da]

u d Fig. 6.1 (i) Identify the anti-proton from the table of particles shown in Fig [1]

Nuclear Physics Part 2A: Radioactive Decays

Crack Tip Flipping: A New Phenomenon yet to be Resolved in Ductile Plate Tearing

Alpha Decay. Decay alpha particles are monoenergetic. Nuclides with A>150 are unstable against alpha decay. E α = Q (1-4/A)

Dynamic Asset Allocation - Identifying Regime Shifts in Financial Time Series to Build Robust Portfolios

A beam theory fracture mechanics approach for strength analysis of beams with a hole

Published in: Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems

Chapter 37. Nuclear Chemistry. Copyright (c) 2011 by Michael A. Janusa, PhD. All rights reserved.

Transcription:

Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 31, 2018 Calculation of fission product decay heat Forskningscenter Risø, Roskilde; Forskningscenter Risø, Roskilde Publication date: 1977 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Henningsen, P., & Mortensen, L. (1977). Calculation of fission product decay heat. Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory. Risø-M, No. 1975 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

m r- Q to Risø Title *nd author(s) Calculation of Fission Product Decay Heat by P. Henningsen and L. Mortensen Risø-M-QHl Oat* Department or group Department of *eactor Technology Group's own registration number(s) 9pages + tablet illustrations Abstract A method is described for calculating decay schemes for nuclei far from the line of beta stability. Results of calculations of the decay heat using these calculated decay schemes are compared with experimental results. PH/LM/ge Copies to Av;»iia»»i(j on request from M;-..? Library, Risø Notional laboratory (Win/ Bibliotek, b'-jr^gsanixg fiia*}, DK-'+ooo HoskiLdr, Denm:T.<

ISBN 87-550-0509-8 ISSN 0418-6435

- 1-1. INTRODUCTION There is a finite risk that water reactors loose their primary coolant. If this happens, the chain reaction and heat production are expected to cease promptly. However, two sources of heat remain: The energy accumulated in the uranium fuel, and the radioactive fission products. A method to calculate the contribution from the latter source is described in the present report. The heat from the radioactive decay of fission products - in short form called decay heat - depends on the density of the fission products in the reactor fuel and their decay schemes The calculation of decay heat is an easy task when the decay schemes are known. The problem is that decay schemes are not known for all fission products, especially not for those far from the line of beta stability. A method to calculate decay schemes for these nuclides is described together with the methods used to calculate the fission product density and the decay heat. 2. FISSION PRODUCT DENSITY CALCULATIONS The density N.(t) of the fission product i at the time t is determined from the following set of coupled differential equations: dn.(t) % "" It "* x i N i< t > + «j<t)hj(t) i-1, 2,, nm. (2.1) where A.is the effective decay constant that is equal to the sum of the radioactive decay constant X. and the capture rate. nm»., is the source strength (fission rate times fission yield, activation rate, ox radioactive decay). The general solutions to the equations 2.1 are: -X,t ~\.t o X.t nm N«(t+t )»N 4 (t rt )e * X J X I S 4 (T)N.(T)dT t 1»1 J J z 3 x o (2.2 1 * 1,2,,nm

- 2 - In reactor physics calculations t is of the order of 1-100 days. In the calculations of N^t+t ) Made by means of the equations 2.2 t is divided into a number of til intervals At. The At k *s are chosen in the following way: Lt x At. = t/2 n 2At, At n = 2At -l and finally t At n At n-1 +At, For the time interval At. for which S.(T) N.(T) is assumed constant, 2.2 is: N i (At k +At k-l + ' " +&t l +t o ) * N i* at k-1 + ' * At i +t 0> e -A At, nm I s,n, i i 3 3 -X At k (1-e x K ) 1,2, t nm (2.3) {^(t+tø) is calculated using 2.3 for the At^'s for k - 1, 2,...,n, n is calculated from the shortest half-life T, for the fission products treated in the density calculations and t in the following way: t In T Tn7 1 (2.4 3. DATA FOR THE DENSITY CALCULATIONS A total of 563 different nuclides, including metastable states, are treated in the fission product calculations. Fission product yields and halflives are taken from ' and capture cross sections are taken from the UK fission product library and trans* formed into 76-group cross sections. The capture cross sections

- 3 - are not known for all fission products and are put equal to zero when unknown. The fission products with unknown cross sections are shortlived and the errors introduced by this assumption are therefore acceptable small. The 76-group cross sections are given in the library FPDATA. 4. DECAY HEAT CALCULATIONS All the above-mentioned fission products decay by the emission of beta particles and the subsequent emission of gamma rays. The kinetic energy of the beta particles and the energy of the gamma rays is absorbed in the fuel and the cladding material, and the decay heat DH is calculated in the following way: nfp DH(t) - F X^U) q ± (4.1) i=l where nfp is the number of fission products q. is the sum of the energy carried by the beta particles and the energy carried by the gamma rays. The amount of energy carried by the gamma rays depends on the decay scheme of the nuclide i. The kinetic energy of the beta particles takes any value between zero and a maximum value, which depends on the energy of the excited levels in the daughter nuclide. The calculation of q., and also of DH, therefore demands knowledge of the decay scheme of the nuclide i and the spectrum of the kinetic energy of the beta particles. 5. DECAY SCHEMES Decay s-nemes are known for 287 of the above mentioned 563 2) 3) nuclides and they are taken from and and given in the library BGDATA. The nuclides with unknown decay schemes are short-lived, and to disregard them would introduce an error in the calculations of the decay heat for the first 100 seconds after shut-down of a reactor. Like other authors ', we have tried to calculate a decay scheme for the nuclides with unfcggyn decay schemes by calculating an average value of the ratio/ y\

- 4 - between the total decay energy Q and the average value of gamma energy E from the 287 known decay schemes. This ratio is used to calculate the amount of energy carried by the beta particle and the amount of energy carried by the gamma, quantum from the Q value. The result was T7 (» 0.35 0.25. (5.1) However the above mentioned method was rejected because of the large uncertainty in the result. Decay schemes for the nuclides with unknown decay schemes were instead calculated in the way described below. 5.1 Decay schemes for nuclides far from the line of beta stability All the nuclides with unknown decay schemes are far from the line of beta stability, and decay can proceed to a large number of excited levels. We therefore use a concept known from the theory of nuclear reactions, that of a strength function, to calculate the decay schemes. The probability b(e) that a nuclide decays to the level at the energy Q-E by emission of a beta particle is: 2 f-e 6, - * M ±. ^ Jm Q c 2 P(E)dE ME) - ^ 5^ ;-. (5.2) f M if' f 2 P(E)dE de J Jm o C P(E) is the probability that the beta particle is emitted with the energy E. By means of 6.1, 5.2 is transformed into m Q C g - h,.i - ^ V " M ifi f <Q- E ' z > «UQ c J 9 f J,«IM,2 if l f(q-e,2)de 2irh o.u7 O where max f(q-e,z) -/ 1 F(Z,c) (e 2 -l)* c(c IMX -c)dc

- 5 - m Q is the mass of the electron at rest, c is the velocity of light, h is the Planck's constant, and g is a coupling constant. M if' is the inte 9 ral over space of the product of the wave functions for the nucleus before decay, the initial state, and after decay, the final state. M. f depends on the maximum kinetic energy of the beta particle. F(Z,e) is a function that considers the coulomb interaction between the nucleus and the beta particle. P(Z,e) «k(z) j e -1 m c 2 +E fl kin r m O P _ B o o k.in E- is the kinetic energy of the beta particle. emax ig tne jaajjjjmj^ vai ue f Cf c mmx > «- an<j m c k(z) is a function depending only on the atomic number z. 2 For a large number of excited levels, IM^^I is written as lml 2 p(e), where p(e) is the level density and where INI 2 is an average value of the matrix elements. By analogy with nuclear reaction theory, a beta strength function Sg(E) is defined by S S (E) constant lmi 2 -p(e). (5.4) It is known from ' that S g (E) is zero below a cut-off energy E, and that it takes a constant value above this cut-off energy. E_ is equal to 0, 12/VK MeV, and 26/vX for even-even, odd mass and odd-odd nuclides respectively. A is the atomic weight. By replacing 'M if l 2 by IMI 2 p(e) and using 5.4 and the abovementioned characteristics of S-(E), equation 5.3 is transformed into

- 6 - b(e) JlfiH^ii _. {5. 5) / f(q-e,z)dé E_ An analytical expression is known for f(q-e,s) and it is easy to calculate b(e) by means of 5.5 In the decay scheme calculations the number m of beta decay branches is quite arbitrarily chosen equal to the first integer larger than Q. The energy interval from 0 to Q is divided into subintervals with the boundaries E «0, E,, E-...- E. «Q, and the probability that a nuclide decays to levels at energy E with E.<E<E. j is E Jg 5 " 1 f(q-e, *)de B --3J :,. (5.6) JE C This means that we assume that the nuclide decays to levels V E j-i energy m*. The decay scheme is established by assuming that the decay from an excited level to the ground state takes place by the emission of one gamma quantum. 6. THE KINETIC ENERGY OF THE BETA PARTICLES The maximum value of the kinetic energy of the beta particles is known from the decay schemes and the kinetic energy of the beta particles is calculated using Fermi's theory of beta decay, which gives the following formula for the spectrum of the kinetic energy of the beta particles m 5 c 4 g 2 P(e) de «3? 2n h lm if l 2 F(Z,e) (e 2 -l)* <e** x -e)ede (6.1) The amount of the kinetic energy of the beta particle, which is absorbed, is calculated as the average value of the

- 7 - kinetic energy max e / r ep<e)de max J P(e)de 1 (6.2) Using the expression for F(Z,e) and the information of the 2 energy dependence of lm. 'if 1 -I given above, equation 6.2 is transformed into..max J, (e-l)c'(c.2. max -c)'de - - L Emax / e 2 (e""-e) 2 dc 1 (6.3) This formula 6.3 is used to calculated the average energy of beta particles absorbed in the reactor materials. The formula 5.6 is used to calculate the amount of energy carried by the gamma rays and the total amount of energy absorbed in the reactor materials, and the decay heat can now be calculated. 7. CALCULATIONS Calculations of the decay heat from fission products formed 235-4 by fission in U due to a neutron burst of 10 seconds were performed, and the results of the calculations are shown in 9) figure 1 together with experimental results taken from The calculated results for the decay heat show values below those of the experimental results from 0-100 seconds after the burst. The largest discrepancy of 15%, is found 1 second after the burst. The accuracy of the measurements is said in to be 15%, and the calculated results and these experimental results are found to agree satisfactorily. A further evaluation of the described method of calculating the decay heat demands»ore accurate measurements.

- 8-8. REFERENCES M.E. Meek and B.P. Rider. Compilation of Fission Product Yields. NEDO-12154-1. January 1974. C.N. Lederer et al. Table of Isotopes, sixth edition. Johv Wiley ft Sons. 1967. C. Neixner. Gammaenergien, teil 1. Jul-811-RX. December 1971. R.D. Evans. The atomic Nucleus. McGraw-Hill Book Company. 1955 M. Goldsmith and K. Shurc On the Average Energies of B~ Particles Emitted by Fission Products. Nucl. Sci. and Eng., nc.3, p. 322. July 1976. Japanese Nuclear Data Comittee. Estimation of Decay Data for Short-lived Fission Products. Submitted to the 18th NEACRP meting. June 1975. A. Damkjcr, et al. Compound Nucleus Aspects of Beta Decays with High Q Values. Proceedings from the International Conference on the Properties of Nuclei Far from the Line of Stability, CERN 70-30, vol 1. November 1970. A.N. Perry, et al. Fission Product Afterheat: A Review of Experiments Pertinent to the Thermal 235 Neutron Fission of '"u. ORNL-TM-4197. October 1973.

- 9 -» 1 o o 1 1 Calculations Measurements by Perry o VO - 1 1 1 10-1 10 10 1 10 2 TIME AFTER SHUT-DOWN (sec) 10 ; Pig. 1. Decay heat vs. the time after the burst (Reactor shut-down).