High-Energy Spectral Signatures in Gamma-Ray Bursts

Similar documents
Gamma-Ray Bursts Above 1 GeV

GRB Spectra and their Evolution: - prompt GRB spectra in the γ-regime

High Energy Emission. Brenda Dingus, LANL HAWC

Milagro A TeV Observatory for Gamma Ray Bursts

(Fermi observations of) High-energy emissions from gamma-ray bursts

Construction and Preliminary Application of the Variability Luminosity Estimator

RXTE Observations of PKS during the November 1997 Gamma-Ray Outburst

Gamma-Ray Astronomy. Astro 129: Chapter 1a

BATSE Evidence for GRB Spectral Features

Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts. Edward Fenimore, NIS-2 Richard Epstein, NIS-2 Cheng Ho, NIS-2 Johannes Intzand, NIS-2

MeV Quasar Observations with the. COMPTON Gamma Ray Observatory

EBL Studies with the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

Future Gamma-Ray Observations of Pulsars and their Environments

Emission Model And GRB Simulations

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph] 31 Oct 2008

A New Look at the Galactic Diffuse GeV Excess

ON GRB PHYSICS REVEALED BY FERMI/LAT

Fermi-LAT Recent Results on Gamma-Ray Bursts

Physics of Short Gamma-Ray Bursts Explored by CTA and DECIGO/B-DECIGO

New Tests of Lorentz Invariance Following from Observations of. the Highest Energy Cosmic Gamma Rays. Abstract

Cosmological Evolution of Blazars

Variability in GRBs - A Clue

Gammaray burst spectral evolution in the internal shock model: comparison with the observations

Lecture 20 High-Energy Astronomy. HEA intro X-ray astrophysics a very brief run through. Swift & GRBs 6.4 kev Fe line and the Kerr metric

Using BATSE to Measure. Gamma-Ray Burst Polarization. M. McConnell, D. Forrest, W.T. Vestrand and M. Finger y

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 7 Apr 2001

Rest-frame properties of gamma-ray bursts observed by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor

PERSPECTIVES of HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINO ASTRONOMY. Paolo Lipari Vulcano 27 may 2006

1. GAMMA-RAY BURSTS & 2. FAST RADIO BURSTS

GLAST Mission: Status and Science Opportunities

COMPTEL OBSERVATIONS OF THE BLAZAR PKS DURING A GAMMA-RAY HIGH STATE IN 1995

Extreme high-energy variability of Markarian 421

Science of Compact X-Ray and Gamma-ray Objects: MAXI and GLAST

What Can GLAST Say About the Origin of Cosmic Rays in Other Galaxies

Jun. Prof. Dr. Alessandro MIRIZZI (Universität Hamburg)

Estimation of neutrino spectra from AGNs using measured VHE γ-ray spectra

The Galactic diffuse gamma ray emission in the energy range 30 TeV 3 PeV

GRB : Modeling of Multiwavelength Data

Detectors for 20 kev 10 MeV

Gamma-Ray Bursts - I. Stellar Transients / Gamma Ray Bursts I 1

GAMMA RAY BURST PREDICTIONS FOR THE FERMI GAMMA RAY SPACE TELESCOPE

GAMMA-RAY BURST PHYSICS WITH GLAST

The Case of the 300 kpc Long X-ray Jet in PKS at z=1.18

Gamma-Ray Bursts from High. Velocity Neutron Stars. Tomasz Bulik and Donald Q. Lamb. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics. University of Chicago

The Angular Distribution of. COMPTEL Gamma-Ray Bursts. R.M. Kippen, J. Ryan, A. Connors, M. McConnell,

Calibrating Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes with the LAT

Gamma-ray Astrophysics

X-ray flashes and X-ray rich Gamma Ray Bursts

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 27 Mar 2000

arxiv:astro-ph/ v3 27 Jul 2000

GAMMA-RAY BURST ENERGY SPECTRA: THEORETICAL MODELS, OLD AND NEW MATTHEW G. BARING. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 665,

Astro2020 Science White Paper Prospects for the detection of synchrotron halos around middle-age pulsars

COMPTON OBSERVATORY OBSERVATIONS OF AGN

MILAGRO. 1 The Milagro detector. SABRINA CASANOVA for THE MILAGRO COLLABORATION. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, US

The Discovery of Gamma-Ray Bursts

Multiwavelength Observations of 3C 66A in

The 2006 Giant Flare in PKS and Unidentified TeV Sources. Justin Finke Naval Research Laboratory 5 June 2008

Absorption and production of high energy particles in the infrared background

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 29 May 2000

Search for exotic process with space experiments

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 13 May 1999

Astrophysics with GLAST: dark matter, black holes and other astronomical exotica

arxiv:astro-ph/ v3 13 Nov 2006

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 28 May 2004

Neutrino Oscillations and Astroparticle Physics (5) John Carr Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille (IN2P3/CNRS) Pisa, 10 May 2002

High-energy emission from Gamma-Ray Bursts. Frédéric Daigne Institut d Astrophysique de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays I

GLAST and beyond GLAST: TeV Astrophysics

Gamma-Ray Bursts and their Afterglows

Radiative processes in GRB (prompt) emission. Asaf Pe er (STScI)

Absorption of Intergalactic TeV Gamma-Rays

Gamma-ray Astronomy Missions, and their Use of a Global Telescope Network

FOURIER ANALYSIS OF GAMMA-RAY BURST LIGHT CURVES: SEARCHING FOR DIRECT SIGNATURE OF COSMOLOGICAL TIME DILATION

AGIS (Advanced Gamma-ray Imaging System)

Interpretation of Early Bursts

Two recent developments with Gamma Ray Burst Classification. And their implications for GLAST. Eric Charles. Glast Science Lunch Nov.

is set by the variability timescale as seen in BATSE light curves, for example). This number, N, is obtained by inte- N ;e

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 27 Jun 2002

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 14 Jun 1999

Origin of X-rays in blazars

Hard X-ray emission from Novae

Relativistic jets in AGNs

High-z Blazar SEDs Clues to Evolution in the Early Universe. Hongjun An Roger Romani on behalf of the Fermi-LAT Collaboration

UNDERSTANDING POWERFUL JETS AT DIFFERENT SCALES IN THE FERMI ERA. B. THE KPC SCALE: X-RAY EMISSION MECHANISM AND JET SPEED

10 Years. of TeV Extragalactic Science. with VERITAS. Amy Furniss California State University East Bay

Search for high-energy neutrinos from GRB130427A with the ANTARES neutrino telescope

GAMMA-RAY ASTRONOMY: IMAGING ATMOSPHERIC CHERENKOV TECHNIQUE FABIO ZANDANEL - SESIONES CCD

Energy-dependent variability in blazars SSC simulations

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 8 May 2005

Hunting for Dark Matter in Anisotropies of Gamma-ray Sky: Theory and First Observational Results from Fermi-LAT

A low EBL level revealed by the H.E.S.S. spectra of 1ES and H

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 17 Aug 2010

Distinct Features of Pulsar Polar-Gap Emission at the High-Energy Spectral Cutoff

Princeton University Observatory preprint POP-567. Submitted to Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2 June 1994

Very high energy gamma-emission of Perseus Cluster

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 9 Jan 1996

THE CONNECTION BETWEEN SPECTRAL EVOLUTION AND GAMMA-RAY BURST LAG Dan Kocevski and Edison Liang

Constraints on Extragalactic Background Light from Cherenkov telescopes: status and perspectives for the next 5 years

VERITAS Design. Vladimir Vassiliev Whipple Observatory Harvard-Smithsonian CfA

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 16 Dec 1999

Transcription:

To appear in Proc. of Snowbird TeV Gamma-Ray Workshop ed. B. L. Dingus (AIP, New York, 1999) High-Energy Spectral Signatures in Gamma-Ray Bursts Matthew G. Baring arxiv:astro-ph/9911061v1 4 Nov 1999 Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, Code 661 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 baring@lheavx.gsfc.nasa.gov Universities Space Research Association Abstract. One of the principal results obtained by the EGRET experiment aboard the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory (CGRO) was the detection of several γ-ray bursts (GRBs) above 100 MeV. The broad-band spectra obtained for these bursts gave no indication of any high energy spectral attenuation that might preclude detection of bursts by ground-based Čerenkov telescopes (ACTs), thus motivating several TeV observational programs. This paper explores the expectations for the spectral properties in the TeV and sub-tev bands for bursts, in particular how attenuation of photons by pair creation internal to the source modifies the spectrum to produce distinctive spectral signatures. The energy of spectral breaks and the associated spectral indices provide valuable information that can constrain the bulk Lorentz factor of the GRB outflow at a given time. These characteristics define palpable observational goals for ACT programs, and strongly impact the observability of bursts in the TeV band. INTRODUCTION High energy gamma-rays have been observed for six gamma-ray bursts by the EGRET experiment on CGRO. Most conspicuous among these observations is the emission of an 18 GeV photon by the GRB940217 burst [1]. Taking into account the instrumental field of view, these detections indicate that emission in the 1 MeV 10 GeV range is probably common among bursts, if not universal. One implication of GRB observability at energies around or above 1 MeV is that, at these energies, spectral attenuation by two-photon pair production (γγ e + e ) is absent in the source. From this fact, early on Schmidt [2] concluded that if a typical burst produced quasi-isotropic radiation, it had to be less distant than a few kpc, since the optical depth τ γγ scales as the square of the distance to the burst. This result conflicted with BATSE s determination of the spatial isotropy and inhomogeneity of bursts [3], which suggested that they are either in an extended halo or at cosmological distances (where τ γγ 10 12 for isotropic photons). Hence Fenimore et al. [4] proposed that GRB photon angular distributions are highly beamed and produced by a relativistically moving plasma, a suggestion that has

become very popular. This can dramatically reduce τ γγ and blueshift spectral attenuation turnovers out of the observed spectral range. Various determinations of the bulk Lorentz factor Γ of the GRB medium have been made in recent years, mostly concentrating [5,6] on cases where the angular extent of the source was of the order of 1/Γ. These calculations generally assume an infinite power-law burst spectrum, and deduce [7] that gamma-ray transparency up to the maximum energy detected by EGRET requires Γ > 100 103 for cosmological bursts. While power-law source spectrum assumption is expedient, the spectral curvature seen in most GRBs by BATSE [8] is expected to play an important role in reducing the opacity for potential TeV emission from these sources (Baring & Harding [9]). Such curvature is patently evident in 200 kev 2 MeV spectra of some EGRETdetected bursts, and its prevalence in bursts is indicated by the generally steep EGRET spectra for bursts [1,10,11]. In this paper, the principal effects introduced into pair production opacity calculations by spectral breaks in the BATSE energy range are considered, focusing the work of [9] to identify the properties of cosmological bursts in the 1 GeV 1 TeV range. These signatures are clearly distinguishable from absorption by background radiation fields, thereby defining diagnostics that future ground-based initiatives such as Veritas, MILAGRO, HESS and MAGIC, and space missions such as GLAST can provide for GRB studies. SPECTRAL CURVATURE AND γ-γ ATTENUATION The simplest picture [5,6] of relativistic beaming has blobs of material moving with a bulk Lorentz factor Γ more-or-less toward the observer, and having an angular extent 1/Γ. For an infinite power-law spectrum n(ε) = n γ ε α, where ε is the photon energy in units of m e c 2 (a dimensionless convention used throughout), for which the optical depth to pair creation assumes the form τ γγ (ε) ε α 1 Γ (1+2α) for Γ 1. As noted above, the input source spectrum needs to be modified, to explore the effects of a relative depletion of low energy photons in the BATSE range. The simplest approximation to spectral curvature is a power-law broken at a dimensionless energy ε B ( = E B /0.511 MeV): n(ε) = n γ ε α h B { ε α l ε α l B, if ε εb, ε α h ε α h B, ε > εb. The optical depth determination for such a distribution utilizes results obtained in [12] for truncated power-laws. The resulting forms are presented in [9], and the optical depth τ γγ (ε) for attenuation of a broken power-law photon distribution has the basic form τ γγ (ε) n γ σ T R ε α h 1 Γ 2α, if ε h < Γ2 /ε B, ε α l 1 Γ 2α, if ε > l Γ 2 /ε B, (1) (2)

FIGURE 1. The γ-γ attenuation, internal to the source, for GRB 930131 at distances typical of nearby (solid curves, Γ = 150, 250, 350 ) and distant (short dashed curves, Γ = 800, 1200, 1600 ) cosmological origin, for bulk Lorentz factors Γ of the emitting region. The source spectrum (νf ν format) was a power-law broken at E B = 0.7 MeV, with spectral indices α l = 1.2 and α h = 2.0. The filled circle denotes the highest energy EGRET photon at 1000 MeV [7]. The threshold and sensitivity for ACT observations of later bursts is indicated by the ACT box. that implies breaks in the absorbed portion of the hard gamma-ray spectrum that image the BATSE band break in the seed photons. More gradual spectral curvature can be treated by fitting the GRB continuum with piecewise continuous power-laws. A variability size R v = 3 10 7 cm ( = R/Γ ) is chosen here following [7,9], and the observed flux at 1 MeV normalizes the source density coefficient n γ. The results of the attenuation of the spectra in Eq. (1) are depicted in Fig. 1 using an attenuation factor 1/(1+τ γγ ) that is appropriate for opacity skin depth effects. The source spectrum parameters are chosen to approximate the observed values for the Superbowl burst GRB930131, for two different extragalactic distance scales: the nearer one, 30 Mpc, is appropriate to scenarios where GRBs generate ultra-high energy cosmic rays. Clearly the attenuation is marked in the GeV TeV band for the Lorentz factors Γ chosen, and could be reduced by increasing Γ. The onset of attenuation couples to Γ and the EGRET band spectral index α h, and above this turnover the immediate spectral index is 1 2α h. Precise knowledge of the GRB distance, such as through redshifts of accompanying optical afterglows, would facilitate the determination of tight constraints on Γ. For either distance scale in Fig. 1, there is a flattening (to index 1 α h α l ) in the TeV/sub-TeV band that is a consequence of the spectral break in the BATSE band: it arises at ε Γ 2 /ε B.

FIGURE 2. An evolutionary sequence for γ - γ attenuation, starting with a GRB930131 data fit, appropriate to an adiabatically-decelerating blast wave. The GLAST steady-source differential ( E/E = 2 step-function) and approximate Whipple integral sensitivities (ACT box; derived from upper limits to later bursts) are depicted. A case of exponential attenuation (for the Γ = 350, dashed line) is illustrated; it would inhibit detections by ACTs. The potential for observational diagnostics is immediately apparent. First, the extant EGRET data already provides a lower bound to Γ : the dot on Fig. 1 represents the highest energy photon from GRB930131, and clearly suggests that Γ > 250 for d = 30 Mpc or Γ > 800 for d = 1 Gpc. Second, the sensitivity of ACTs is easily sufficient to detect bursts even with significant attenuation, so that they could well probe the spectral issues raised here. While the Whipple rapid search [13] postdated the EGRET detections, and produced merely upper limits as indicated in Fig. 1, an intriguing possible detection of a BATSE burst by the MILAGRITO forerunner to MILAGRO was announced at this meeting by McEnery et al. (these proceedings), foreshadowing advances to come. Perhaps the greatest strides in understanding will be precipitated by broad-band spectral coverage afforded by simultaneous detection of bursts by GLAST and TeV experiments like MILAGRO. Fig. 2 displays a time-evolutionary sequence of GRB spectra, including the effects of γ - γ attenuation, and compares this with the potentially-constraining current Whipple integral sensitivity threshold (deduced from the results of [13]), and the projected GLAST steady-source differential sensitivity. The GLAST sensitivity is obtained from simulations (Digel, private communication) of the spectral capability for high latitude, steady sources in a one-year survey, i.e. roughly 8 weeks on source. The real GLAST sensitivity for transient GRBs of duration t dur can be estimated to be roughly [(8 weeks)/t dur ] 1/2 times that

depicted. Note that the differential sensitivity is the most appropriate measure for spectral diagnostic capabilities. Evidently, ACTs and GLAST working in concert will be able to determine the spectral shape and evolution of bright, flat-spectrum bursts like GRB930131 if the attenuation is no more dramatic than 1/(1 + τ γγ ). The particular evolutionary scenario depicted in Fig. 2 is an adiabatic one for blast wave deceleration during the sweep-up phase, where the dependences on time t are Γ t 3/8, ε B Γ 4 t 3/2, and ε 2 Bf(ε B ) Γ 8/3 t 1 for the flux at the peak [14]. Shifts in the turnover energy and sub-tev break energy, and correlations with BATSE flux and break energy should be discernible in bright sources. It must be emphasized that these internal absorption characteristics are easily distinguishable from those of external absorption due to the cosmological infrared background along the line of sight [15,16]. Attenuation by such background fields couples to the redshift, not parameters internal to the source nor the shape of the spectrum in the BATSE and EGRET bands. Furthermore, it is always exponential in nature (i.e. of severity equivalent to the dashed curve in Fig. 2) since the emission region is distinct from the location of the soft target photons, and is patently independent of time. The possibility of confusing such with the internal attenuation that forms the focus of this paper seems minimal. Hence, the prospects for powerful spectral diagnostics in bright bursts with atmospheric Čerenkov telescopes and the GLAST mission promise an exciting time ahead for the field of high energy gamma-ray astronomy. Acknowledgments: I thank Alice Harding and Brenda Dingus for helpful discussions, and Seth Digel for simulating GLAST spectral sensitivities. REFERENCES 1. Hurley, K. et al. Nature 372, 652 (1994). 2. Schmidt, W. K. H. Nature 271, 525 (1978). 3. Meegan, C., et al. Ap. J. Supp. 106, 65 (1996). 4. Fenimore, E. E., Epstein, R. I. & Ho, C. in Gamma-Ray Bursts, eds. Paciesas, W. S. and Fishman, G. J., (AIP, New York) p. 158 (1992). 5. Krolik, J. H. & Pier, E. A. Ap. J. 373, 277 (1991). 6. Baring, M. G. Ap. J. 418, 391 (1993) 7. Baring, M. G. & Harding, A. K. Ap. J. 491, 663 (1997b). 8. Band, D., et al. Ap. J. 413, 281 (1993). 9. Baring, M. G. & Harding, A. K. Ap. J. Lett. 481, L85 (1997a). 10. Schneid, E. J., et al. Astron. Astr. (Lett.) 255, L13 (1992). 11. Sommer, M., et al. Ap. J. Lett. 422, L63 (1994). 12. Gould, R. J. & Schreder, G. P. Phys. Rev. 155, 1404 (1967). 13. Connaughton, V. et al. Ap. J. 479, 859 (1997). 14. Dermer, C. D., Chiang, J. & Böttcher, M. Ap. J. 513, 656 (1999). 15. Stecker, F. W. & De Jager, O. C. Space Sci. Rev. 75, 401 (1996). 16. Mannheim, K., Hartmann, D. & Funk, B. Ap. J. 467, 532 (1996).