Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

Similar documents
Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 34 The Photoelectric Effect

Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation. References:

Roger Johnson Structure and Dynamics: X-ray Diffraction Lecture 6

Interaction X-rays - Matter

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

Particle nature of light & Quantization

Atomic Transitions and Selection Rules

Atomic Structure and Processes

Interaction theory Photons. Eirik Malinen

Lecture 11: Polarized Light. Fundamentals of Polarized Light. Descriptions of Polarized Light. Scattering Polarization. Zeeman Effect.

Decays and Scattering. Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles

For the next several lectures, we will be looking at specific photon interactions with matter. In today s lecture, we begin with the photoelectric

Lecture 01. Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics

Physics PhD Qualifying Examination Part I Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Quantum and Atomic Physics - Multiple Choice

We have completed a discussion of one of the photon interaction processes, the photoelectric effect. We will now begin a discussion of the process of

Astrophysical Radiation Processes

ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

Non-relativistic scattering

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

2018 Quantum Physics

ECE 487 Lecture 6 : Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics I Class Outline:

Physics 221B Spring 2012 Notes 42 Scattering of Radiation by Matter

Particles and Waves Particles Waves

Physics 504, Lecture 22 April 19, Frequency and Angular Distribution

Outline. Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. Photon interactions. Photoelectric effect

Chapter 37 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Quantum Mechanics II Lecture 11 ( David Ritchie

Photons in the universe. Indian Institute of Technology Ropar

Chapter 37 Early Quantum Theory and Models of the Atom

Conclusion. 109m Ag isomer showed that there is no such broadening. Because one can hardly

6. QED. Particle and Nuclear Physics. Dr. Tina Potter. Dr. Tina Potter 6. QED 1

The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules

4. Spontaneous Emission october 2016

LECTURE 6: INTERACTION OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

is the minimum stopping potential for which the current between the plates reduces to zero.

Matter-Radiation Interaction

Lecture 8 Feynman diagramms. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

LECTURES ON QUANTUM MECHANICS

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

Physics 1C Lecture 29B

Ψ t = ih Ψ t t. Time Dependent Wave Equation Quantum Mechanical Description. Hamiltonian Static/Time-dependent. Time-dependent Energy operator

14 Time-dependent perturbation theory

Relativistic corrections of energy terms

WAVE PARTICLE DUALITY

NERS 311 Current Old notes notes Chapter Chapter 1: Introduction to the course 1 - Chapter 1.1: About the course 2 - Chapter 1.

CHAPTER 2 INTERACTION OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

energy loss Ionization + excitation of atomic energy levels Mean energy loss rate de /dx proportional to (electric charge) 2 of incident particle

1 The Cathode Rays experiment is associated. with: Millikan A B. Thomson. Townsend. Plank Compton

Compton Scattering I. 1 Introduction

CHAPTER 3 Prelude to Quantum Theory. Observation of X Rays. Thomson s Cathode-Ray Experiment. Röntgen s X-Ray Tube

Neutron and x-ray spectroscopy


Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

Announcements. Lecture 8 Chapter. 3 Wave & Particles I. EM- Waves behaving like Particles. The Compton effect (Arthur Compton 1927) Hypothesis:

CHAPTER 3 The Experimental Basis of Quantum Theory

Rb, which had been compressed to a density of 1013

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

Attempts at relativistic QM

INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

Lecture 15 Notes: 07 / 26. The photoelectric effect and the particle nature of light

UGC ACADEMY LEADING INSTITUE FOR CSIR-JRF/NET, GATE & JAM PHYSICAL SCIENCE TEST SERIES # 4. Atomic, Solid State & Nuclear + Particle

Explain how Planck resolved the ultraviolet catastrophe in blackbody radiation. Calculate energy of quanta using Planck s equation.

1. Nuclear Size. A typical atom radius is a few!10 "10 m (Angstroms). The nuclear radius is a few!10 "15 m (Fermi).

Lecture PowerPoints. Chapter 27 Physics: Principles with Applications, 7th edition Giancoli

Radiation-matter interaction.

The Photoelectric Effect

Particle Interactions in Detectors

Detecting high energy photons. Interactions of photons with matter Properties of detectors (with examples)

Stellar Astrophysics: The Interaction of Light and Matter

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Quantum Light-Matter Interactions

NYU Physics Preliminary Examination in Electricity & Magnetism Fall 2011

Chapter 30 Quantum Physics 30.1 Blackbody Radiation and Planck s Hypothesis of Quantum Energy 30.2 Photons and the Photoelectric Effect 30.

Lecture 3. lecture slides are at:

Radiation processes and mechanisms in astrophysics I. R Subrahmanyan Notes on ATA lectures at UWA, Perth 18 May 2009

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

Interaction of particles with matter - 2. Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Physics 126 Practice Exam #4 Professor Siegel

( ) /, so that we can ignore all


Blackbody Radiation. Rayleigh-Jeans law was an attempt to explain blackbody radiation based on classical ideas:

The Bohr Model of Hydrogen

David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

Chapter 2 Problem Solutions

Lecture 6:Feynman diagrams and QED

Time dependent perturbation theory 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 11 May 2012

FIBER OPTICS. Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar. Department of Electrical Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture: 15. Optical Sources-LASER

Introduction to particle physics Lecture 2

2013 CAP Prize Examination

PHYS 3650L - Modern Physics Laboratory

Lecture notes for QFT I (662)

22.54 Neutron Interactions and Applications (Spring 2004) Chapter 1 (2/3/04) Overview -- Interactions, Distributions, Cross Sections, Applications

We start with a reminder of a few basic concepts in probability. Let x be a discrete random variable with some probability function p(x).

LECTURE 4 PRINCIPLE OF IMAGE FORMATION KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

Atomic and nuclear physics

Transcription:

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015) Interaction of x-ray with matter: - Photoelectric absorption - Elastic (coherent) scattering (Thomson Scattering) - Inelastic (incoherent) scattering (Compton Effect) - Creation of electron-positron pair (E >1.022 MeV) - 1) Scattering from a single electron classical description Here we will deal only with the case of elastic scattering, where an incident photon of momentum and polarization will be scattered from a single electron. After the scattering event, the photon has a momentum and a polarization. In the case of elastic scattering, the final state of the electron is identical to its initial state, and the energy of the photon is therefore unchanged. a) Assume the electron is a point charge The electric field corresponding to the incident x-ray beam can be written as:,.. The electron (at 0) experiences the Lorentz force from this electric field and gets accelerated: 0,, and therefore radiates.

a) The detector/observer lies in the polarization b) The detector/observer lies out of the plane of the incident beam polarization plane of the incident beam The electric field radiated in X, at distance R from the electron can be written as (cf electromagnetism):,, where is the apparent acceleration seen by the observer (or the detector) in X at /. If the observer is in the plane of polarization (the (x, z) plane in the figure above): cos2θ 0, cos2θ, and we get:, 0, 4. cos2θ ~2.8 10 is the classical electron radius. If the observer does not lie in the plane of polarization of the incident x-ray, the cos2θ must be dropped. This yields the conventional dipole radiation pattern (valid as long as the electron acceleration remains un-relativistic). A detector counts the number of photons per unit of time, which can also be expressed as the power [=energy per unit of time] flowing through the area of the detector, divided by the energy of each photons. Because the detector as a finite size, it catches the photons emitted within a solid angle ΔΩ (if is the area of the detector, then: ΔΩ / ), ΔΩ 0, We introduce a quantity that is independent of the experimental conditions (size and position of the detector, area of the incident beam etc.. ), the differential cross-section

For a single, point like electron, we therefore get: # ΔΩ Ω ΔΩ Ω, 0, with the polarization factor 2Θ 1 2Θ NB: obviously the scattering cross section for the nuclei will be much smaller than for the electron given the mass differences. b) Atom case Approximated by a charged sphere. The electron density is given by. The phase difference between the wave scattered by an infinitesimal point-like charge at the center of the atom ( 0 and is simply given by:... is the transferred wave vector, which can be expressed as function of the scattering angle 2Θ: 2 sinθ sinθ

Volume element at will contribute to the radiated field as.. The total radiated field is obtained by summing up all the waves radiated by each part of the charge cloud, yielding: Ω =. () The atomic form factor () is simply the Fourier transform of the charge density. 2) Scattering from a single electron Quantum mechanical description The calculation can also be done in a full quantum mechanical approach. To do so, we use the quantized version of the electromagnetic field, through the vector potential,. We recall that the electric and magnetic fields are derived from the scalar (Φ) and vector potential through: = Φ =. ħ, = 2,,,., +,., The operator, (, ) annihilates (create) a photon of momentum and polarization. The total Hamiltonian of the electromagnetic field in free space is simply given by: = ħ,,, + 1 2 and the actual electromagnetic field is described by an assembly of =, photons,, each characterized by a momentum and polarization state. We consider the case of a single electron in the electromagnetic field. The Hamiltonian reads: = + 2, + + = + + = + is the Hamiltonian describing the electron in the absence of the field. Remember that we consider only the case of elastic scattering, where the quantum state of the electron is not modified by the scattering event. This state is an eigenstate of, labelled. The corresponding electronic wave function = is related to the charge density through: = =. and

(NB it does not have to be a single electron, can as well represent the electronic ground state of the entire atom). In summary, the quantum state of the system {electron + photons} is given by Ψ,. During the scattering process, we let the system evolve from the initial Ψ,, to the final quantum state Ψ, 1, 1, through the interaction of the electromagnetic field with the electron. This interaction is described by the electron-photon interaction Hamiltonian:. 2 That will be treated within the perturbation theory. The important thing to keep in mind is that the scattering process is accounted for the annihilation of a photon with momentum and polarization, and the creation of a photon with momentum and polarization. The perturbation term must therefore contain a product of the annihilation operator, and the creation,. Such terms are present in that can therefore be treated to the first order of perturbation, but not directly in., that must be treated in the second order (to the first order, this term can only describe absorption or emission of a photon). This yield to resonant scattering, that is far beyond the scope of the present lecture. We will only consider the non-resonant case, that dominates the scattering crosssection as long as the incident energy of the incoming photon is far from any absorption edge. As in the classical calculation, we want to evaluate the number of photons scattered into a solid angle ΔΩ around. This is given by Fermi golden rule: 2

Where the integral runs over all the possible final photon states within ΔΩ [the electronic state is not changing], satisfying the conservation of energy, and = Ψ Ψ. The density of photon states is given by: =, that is, in ΔΩ: = = ħ (using = ħ ). On the other hand, as we saw in the classical calculation, the number of photons detected in ΔΩ can also be defined using the differential cross section: = ΔΩ. Where is the incident photon flux. Let us consider that the incident photon beam is perfectly monochromatic and polarized, that is that the initial quantum state of the system reads: Ψ =,, = 0,,, = 0, (We simply mean that there are no other photons than the ones with momentum and polarization!). The incident photon flux is therefore: = 0 This yields: Ω = 0 2 ħ We now have to evaluate = Ψ Ψ (we use, and, ) = ħ 2,. +,.,. +.,,,, = ħ 2,,. +,,,., +,,,., +., Only the second and third term of this sum will contribute to the matrix element Ψ Ψ in the case of elastic scattering. Indeed the and terms respectively account for the annihilation and the creation of two photons, and do therefore not contribute to scattering. Mathematically, this comes from the fact that the photon part of the matrix element involving the term is: 0,,, = 1,,, = 1, 0,,0,,, =,,, = 0, 0 = 0,,, = 1,,, = 1, 0, 0, = 1,,, = 0, 0,, As indeed, there are no photons to annihilate in the initial state but those momentum and polarization. The application of the second annihilation operator gives

1 0,,, = 1,,, = 1, 00,,, = 0,,, = 2, 0,,,, The same reasoning holds for the term (there of course it is possible to create two photons with any momentum and polarization, but the net result is that the photon state in which we arrive is not the one we expect from the scattering process). In the end, the only two non-vanishing terms in Ψ Ψ come from: 0,,, = 1,,, = 1, 0,, 0,,, =,,, = 0, 0 =,,,, and 0,,, = 1,,, = 1, 0,, 0,,, =,,, = 0, 0 Ψ Ψ = ħ 2 As a result, we find that:,,, =,,,.,,,, +.,,, using = and = = ħ, we simply obtain: and thus: Ψ Ψ = = ħ.. ħ 2.. Which allows us to write the differential cross-section as: Ω = 0 2 ħ ħ 2.. = 4.. =.

Finally, inserting the completeness conditions 1 in the above equation and the fact that we easily get that. and therefore prove the equivalence of the classical and quantum approaches for the calculation of the Thomson cross section from a charge distribution: Ω 3) Physical meaning of As mentioned earlier.. is the Fourier transform the electronic density. As 0, all parts of the electronic cloud radiate in phase, and we simply get: 0, where Z is the number of electrons in the charge cloud. Not surprisingly, the heavier atoms are the best scatterers. At large, all parts of the cloud radiate incoherently, yielding 0. Example: hydrogen atom in its ground state 1 0 3 / 0 where is the Bohr radius.. 1 /.. 2 /.. sin After integration by part, we get: 2 2 /..... 2. 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2

Note that this is only valid far away from any resonance. In this case, the electrons always appear free to the x-ray electric field, and can accelerate and radiate as discussed. On the other hand, if the photon energy matches the energy of an absorption edge, a resonance phenomenon occurs. This can be simply modeled by a damped forced oscillator. As a result, the atomic form factor becomes, = +, +,. In this expression, is the non-resonant form factor that has been discussed so far, corrected by a complex form factor, +,, strongly frequency dependent that accounts for the resonant absorption during the scattering process. In the quantum mechanical approach, this correction arises from the H A term, treated to the second order in perturbation.