PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

Similar documents
PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

Interaction theory Photons. Eirik Malinen

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

Outline. Chapter 6 The Basic Interactions between Photons and Charged Particles with Matter. Photon interactions. Photoelectric effect

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

Physics of Radiotherapy. Lecture II: Interaction of Ionizing Radiation With Matter

DR KAZI SAZZAD MANIR

Photon Interactions in Matter

Bethe-Block. Stopping power of positive muons in copper vs βγ = p/mc. The slight dependence on M at highest energies through T max

INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

LECTURE 4 PRINCIPLE OF IMAGE FORMATION KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

Interaction X-rays - Matter

Chapter 2: Interactions of Radiation with Matter

CHAPTER 2 INTERACTION OF RADIATION WITH MATTER

For the next several lectures, we will be looking at specific photon interactions with matter. In today s lecture, we begin with the photoelectric

Possible Interactions. Possible Interactions. X-ray Interaction (Part I) Possible Interactions. Possible Interactions. section

Interaction of charged particles and photons with matter

Interactions of Photons with Matter Compton Scatter (Part 2)

Interaction of particles with matter - 2. Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

EEE4101F / EEE4103F Radiation Interactions & Detection

CHAPTER 2 RADIATION INTERACTIONS WITH MATTER HDR 112 RADIATION BIOLOGY AND RADIATION PROTECTION MR KAMARUL AMIN BIN ABDULLAH

Shell Atomic Model and Energy Levels

Chapter 2 Radiation-Matter Interactions

MATR316, Nuclear Physics, 10 cr

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

Physics 111 Homework Solutions Week #9 - Friday

Interactions with Matter Photons, Electrons and Neutrons

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Recitation on the Compton effect Solution

New photon transport model in Serpent 2

hν' Φ e - Gamma spectroscopy - Prelab questions 1. What characteristics distinguish x-rays from gamma rays? Is either more intrinsically dangerous?

Atomic Structure and Processes

Particle Interactions in Detectors

Advanced lab course for Bachelor s students

The Compton Effect. Martha Buckley MIT Department of Physics, Cambridge, MA (Dated: November 26, 2002)

INTRODUCTION TO MEDICAL PHYSICS 1 Quiz #1 Solutions October 6, 2017

Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

Basic physics Questions

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

Chapter 2 Problem Solutions

Airo International Research Journal October, 2015 Volume VI, ISSN:

Compton Scattering I. 1 Introduction

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

2007 Section A of examination problems on Nuclei and Particles

The interaction of radiation with matter

Outline. Radiation Interactions. Spurs, Blobs and Short Tracks. Introduction. Radiation Interactions 1

CHAPTER 4 RADIATION ATTENUATION

Ba (Z = 56) W (Z = 74) preferred target Mo (Z = 42) Pb (Z = 82) Pd (Z = 64)

2. Passage of Radiation Through Matter

Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Cross Sections in Monte Carlo Methods for Medical Physics Applications

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

Interactions of Radiation with Matter

Radiation and the Atom

Particle nature of light & Quantization

PHY-494: Applied Relativity Lecture 5 Relativistic Particle Kinematics

BASIC RADIATION PHYSICS

Interaction of Electron and Photons with Matter

Interaction of Radiation with Matter

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Physics 202H - Introductory Quantum Physics I Midterm Test - A - Solutions

X-ray Interaction with Matter

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

Shielding of Ionising Radiation with the Dosimetry & Shielding Module

Alpha Decay. Decay alpha particles are monoenergetic. Nuclides with A>150 are unstable against alpha decay. E α = Q (1-4/A)

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

Interaction of Particles and Matter

Radiation Signals and Signatures in a Detector (Gamma spectroscopy) Sangkyu Lee

Photon and primary electron arithmetics in photoconductors for digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation studies

1.4 The Compton Effect

Lecture 3 - Compton Scattering

Chapter 38. Photons Light Waves Behaving as Particles

(10%) (c) What other peaks can appear in the pulse-height spectrum if the detector were not small? Give a sketch and explain briefly.

Electron-positron production in kinematic conditions of PrimEx

Analysis of γ spectrum

Compton scattering of 662 kev gamma rays proposed by klein-nishina formula

X-ray Spectroscopy. Danny Bennett and Maeve Madigan. October 12, 2015

Nuclear Decays. Alpha Decay

Physics Modern Physics Professor Jodi Cooley. Welcome back. to PHY Arthur Compton

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Stellar Astrophysics: The Interaction of Light and Matter

DUAL NATURE OF RADIATION AND MATTER

Outline. Absorbed Dose in Radioactive Media. Introduction. Radiation equilibrium. Charged-particle equilibrium

The next three lectures will address interactions of charged particles with matter. In today s lecture, we will talk about energy transfer through

GAMMA-RAY FLOW IMAGING

Week 7: Ch. 10 Spec. w/ Scintillation Ctrs. Photomultiplier Devices

Final Exam Sample Problems

Units and Definition

Passage of particles through matter

Chapter 2 Interactions of Particles in Matter

Decay Mechanisms. The laws of conservation of charge and of nucleons require that for alpha decay, He + Q 3.1

Slides by: Prof. Abeer Alharbi

Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Section 14.8 Thomson Scattering of Radiation

Monte Carlo Radiation Transfer I

Generation of X-Rays in the SEM specimen

Basic physics of nuclear medicine

Transcription:

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry Tuesday 17 March 2009

What are the dominant photon interactions?

(cont.) Compton scattering, the photoelectric effect and pair production are the three main energy transfer mechanisms in photon interactions with matter. Each of these processes can dominate under specific conditions determined chiefly by the incident photon energy hν and atomic number Z of the absorber.

(cont.) Klein-Nishina differential cross section for Compton scattering measures probabilty of photon re-emission into solid angle dω = dφ d cos θ as a result of a Compton interaction between an incident photon and a free electron: d e σ KN c dω = 1 ( ) ν 2 ( ν 2 r2 e ν ν + ν ) ν sin2 θ (1) can be written in terms of Thomson differential cross section, d e σ T /dω = 1 2 r2 e(1 + cos 2 θ), and a form factor: d e σ KN c dω = d eσ T dω F KN (2)

Klein-Nishina form factor: F KN = [1 + ε (1 cos θ)] 2 (3) { ε 2 (1 cos θ) 2 } 1 + [1 + ε(1 cos θ)](1 + cos 2 θ) The Klein-Nishina form factor plotted against scattering angle for different incident photon energies ε = hν/m ec 2. (Fig. 7.9 in Podgoršak).

Klein-Nishina differential cross section forward scattering (θ 0) and backward scattering (θ π) have equal probability in Thomson limit (ε 0) probability of backscattering decreases with increasing ε forward beaming of photon re-emission

Energy distribution of recoil electrons The differential electronic Klein-Nishina cross section can also be expressed as a function of the recoil electron kinetic energy, E K, rather than scattering angle θ since E K = E K (θ) (c.f. eqn. 22 in last lecture): d e σc KN = d eσc KN de K dω = πr2 e εhν dω dθ [ 2 where ξ K = E K /hν. dθ (4) de K 2ξ K ε(1 ξ K ) + ξk 2 ε 2 (1 ξ K ) 2 + ξk 2 ] (1 ξ K )

The Klein-Nishina differential electronic cross section for Compton scattering plotted as a function of recoil electron kinetic energy E K. For a given photon energy, the maximum recoil energy is indicated. Note that these photon energies are all in the limit ε 1 (Fig. 7.12 in Podgoršak). energy distribution peaks sharply near (E K ) max = 2ε 1 + 2ε hν c.f. eqn. (25) in last lecture

Total electronic Klein-Nishina cross section eσ KN c = de σc KN dω { 1 + ε = 2πr 2 e + dω = 2π ε 2 ln(1 + 2ε) 2ε +1 1 [ 2(1 + ε) 1 + 2ε 1 + 3ε (1 + 2ε) 2 d e σc KN dω d cos θ ] ln(1 + 2ε) ε } (5)

Limiting solutions: ε 1: eσ KN c 8π 3 r2 e ( 1 2ε + 26 5 ε2 133 10 ε3 + 1144 ) 35 ε4... ε 0 : e σ KN c 8π 3 r2 e = e σ T = 6.65 10 29 m 2 = 0.665 b =Thomson limit ε 1 : e σ KN c πr 2 e(1 + 2 ln ε)/(2ε) (hν) 1 at high photon energies, Klein-Nishina cross section declines rapidly with respect to the Thomson cross section

Energy Transfer Mean fraction of incident photon energy hν transferred to kinetic energy E K of the recoil electron is an average of the fractional kinetic energy E K /hν weighted over the probability distribution P(θ) for Compton scattering in direction θ, integrated over all scattering angles: E K σ hν = EK hν P(θ) d cos θ (6) P(θ) d cos θ where P(θ) = 1 eσ KN c de σ KN c dω 2π dφ = eσc KN d e σ KN c dω and E K = E K (θ) is given by eqn. (22) in the last lecture. Note that P(θ)d cos θ = 1. (7)

We can now write where E K σ hν = 2π eσc KN = 2π eσc KN = ( eσc KN eσ KN c +1 1 +1 1 ) tr E K hν d e σ KN c dω d cos θ (d e σc KN ) tr dω d cos θ ( e σc KN ) tr = electronic energy transfer cross section (d e σc KN ) tr /dω = differential energy transfer cross section (8)

Differential energy transfer cross section (d e σc KN ) tr dω E K = d eσc KN (9) dω hν = 1 ( ) ν 2 ( ν 2 r2 e ν ν + ν ) ( ) ν ν ν sin2 θ ν where E K = hν hν is the kinetic energy imparted to the recoil electron. From eqn. (22) in the last lecture, the θ dependence is: E K /(hν) = ε(1 cos θ)[1 + ε(1 cos θ)] 1 Note: Podgoršak has some incorrect factors of Ē K and Ē σ K in the expression for (d e σc KN ) tr /dω given by eqn. (7.42). These should be E K, except on the very last line, where Ē σ K /hν should be deleted.

Total energy transfer cross section: d(e σ ( e σc KN c KN ) tr ) tr = dω = 2π dω +1 1 d( e σc KN ) tr d cos θ dω see eqn. (7.51) in Podgoršak for full solution. Recall from eqn. (8) that ( e σc KN ) tr eσc KN = E K σ hν

Atomic cross section e σ KN c is for free electrons independent of Z at high photon energies (hν E B, where E B = electron binding energy), total Compton cross section for entire atom is aσ KN c = Z ( e σ KN c ) (10)

Binding energy effects assumption of free electrons breaks down for photon energies hν E B = electron binding energy overestimates effective Compton atomic cross section a σ C at low hν, especially for high Z material a σ KN c The Compton atomic cross section aσ C (solid curves) compared to the Klein- Nishina atomic cross section aσc KN = Z eσc KN (dashed curves), demonstrating electron binding effects at low hν. (Fig. 7.14 in Podgoršak).

binding energy correction to Compton atomic cross section usually has negligible effect on overall attenuation because other processes (e.g. Rayleigh scattering, photoelectric effect) are usually more important than Compton scattering at low hν and high Z The atomic cross section for Rayleigh scattering (solid curves) compared to that for Compton scattering (dotted curves) plotted against incident photon energy for varying Z atoms. (Fig. 7.20 in Podgoršak)

Compton mass attenuation coefficient σ c ρ = N A A a σ C (11) Compton mass energy transfer coefficient ( ) σc = σ σ c E K ρ ρ hν tr (12) Atomic attenuation coefficient and atomic energy transfer coefficient for lead. (Fig. 7.17 in Podgoršak)

Example: For hν = 1 MeV photons incident on lead (Z = 82, A = 0.2072 kg), the Compton atomic cross section is aσ C = 1.72 10 27 m 2. This can be calculated directly from the expression for e σc KN given by (5) and then using a σ C = Z e σc KN (since binding energy corrections are negligible at this hν). The Compton mass attenuation coefficient is σ c ρ = N A A a σ C = 6.022 1023 0.2072 kg 1.72 10 27 m 2 = 5.00 10 3 m 2 kg 1 The values can be checked by going to the NIST/Xcom database: physics.nist.gov/physrefdata/xcom/text/xcom.html The average fractional recoil energy is obtained by inserting ε = 1.96 into the full solution given by eqn. (7.54) in Podgoršak: E K σ hν 0.440

interaction between photon and tightly bound orbital electron photon completely absorbed, electron ejected momentum transfer to atom, but recoil negligible due to relatively large nuclear mass, so energy conservation is: E K = hν E B photoelectron kinetic energy (13) E B = binding energy of electron orbital approx. 80% occur with K-shell electrons resulting shell vacancy quickly filled by a higher shell electron; resulting transition energy released either as: characteristic (fluorescent) photon Auger electron probability determined by fluorescent yield

Atomic cross section a τ = atomic cross section for photoelectric effect function of hν, exhibits characteristic sawtooth behaviour: sharp discontinuities coinciding with E B of a particular shell absorption edges Atomic cross section for photoabsorption. indicated. (Fig. 7.23 in Podgoršak.) Energies of K-shell ionisation are

e.g. Lead has prominent edges at the following ionisation energies for respective shells: K edge 88.0 kev L 1 edge 15.9 kev L 2 edge 15.2 kev L 3 edge 13.0 kev M edge 3.9 kev

3 distinct regions characterise a τ: 1. in immediate vicinty of absorption edge: a τ poorly known; for K-shell electrons, a τ K ε 3 assumed 2. away from absorption edge: cross section for K-shell electrons is aτ K 32 α 4 eσ T Z n ε 7/2 (14) where α = 1/137 = fine structure constant, n 4 4.6 is a power index for Z dependence 3. ε 1: aτ K 1.5 α 4 eσ T Z 5 ε 1 (15)

Energy transfer Auger electrons sometimes produced mean energy transfer to electrons as a result of photoelectric effect can be in range (no Auger electron) hν E B < E τ tr < hν (Auger electron) fluorescent yield for K-shell, ω K : ω K = 1 characteristic emission only, no Auger electrons ω K = 0 no characteristic emission, Auger electrons only in general, E τ tr = hν P K ω K hν K (16) where P K = fraction of all photoelectric interactions that occur in K-shell for photons with hν > E B (K) (see Fig. 3.3 in Podgoršak).

hν K = K-shell weighted mean of all possible fluorescent transitions (L K, M K); K α usually most probable, giving hν K 0.86E B (K) K-shell binding energy, E B(K), weighted mean characteristic X-ray energy for all transitions to K-shell, hν K, and mean energy of K-shell characteristic emission, P K ω K hν K. (Fig. 7.24 in Podgoršak.)

Example: Consider hν = 0.5 MeV photons incident on lead, which has E B (K) = 88 kev. Suppose the photoelectric effect occurs and is immediately followed by a forbidden K α3 (L 1 K) transition, with ejection of an Auger electron from the L 2 shell. The total energy transferred to electrons = photoelectron energy + Auger electron energy: E tr = [ hν E B (K) ] + [ hν Kα3 E B (L 2 ) ] But hν Kα3 = E B (K) E B (L 1 ), so this simplifies to E tr = hν E B (L 1 ) E B (L 2 ) 0.469 MeV 0.94hν For all K-shell transitions, the average energy transfer is E τ tr = hν P K ω K hν K 500 kev 65 kev = 0.435 MeV 0.87hν

Mass coefficients for the photoelectric effect mass attenuation coefficient: τ ρ = N A A a τ (17) mass energy transfer coefficient: ( τk ρ ) tr = a τ K ρ E τ ( tr hν = a τ K 1 P ) Kω K hν K = a τ K ρ hν ρ f τ (18) where f τ = mean fraction of energy hν transferred to electrons

f τ 1 for low-z absorbers because Auger effect is more prevalent (i.e. fluorescent yield ω K 0) Mean fraction of photon energy hν transferred to electrons in a K-shell photoelectric interaction. (Fig. 7.25 in Podgoršak.)

production of electron-positron (e e + ) pair resulting from photon interaction with atomic nucleus incident photon energy must exceed threshold 2m e c 2 = 1.02 MeV triplet production (e e e + ) results when incident photon interacts with orbital electron; higher threshold energy required: 4m e c 2 = 2.044 MeV

Relativistic kinematics Particle 4-momenta: photon: p ν = hν c (1, ˆk) where ˆk = unit vector in direction of photon 3-momentum (i.e. propagation direction). ( ) ( ) E E electron and positron: p e = c, p e, p e + = c, p e + where p e = γβm e c = p e + are the electron and positron 3-momenta (must have same magnitude, but can have different direction). Must also consider 4-momentum of atom, p a = (E a /c, p a ), which can gain recoil energy.

Conservation of 4-momentum: before: p ν = p e + p e + + p a after Note that the modulus of a 4-vector A = (A 0, A) is: A 2 = A µ A µ = (A 0 ) 2 + A A which implies that (p ν ) 2 = 0 always and (p e ) 2 = m 2 ec 2. If we square the conservation equation above, then (p ν ) 2 = (p e + p e + + p a ) 2 = 0 Now consider the case where p a = 0. We have (p e ) 2 + 2p e p e + + (p e +) 2 = 0 ( ) E = 2m 2 ec 2 2 + 2 c 2 + p e p e + = 0

= 2(γ 2 1)m 2 ec 2 (1 + cos θ e ) = 0 which can only be satisfied if the electron and positron are emitted in exactly opposite directions, with separation angle θ e = π. In general, therefore, the atom must gain some recoil energy from the collision with its nucleus. Because of its relatively large mass, however, the recoil gained by the atom will be small.

Energy transfer to electrons and positrons in pair production interactions: (E K κ ) tr = hν 2m e c 2 (19) is the total kinetic energy gained by the particles (ignoring atom recoil energy). Generally, the electron and positron can be emitted with different kinetic energies, but their average energy still satisfies or, for triplet production E K pp = 1 2 (hν 2m ec 2 ) (20) E K tp = 1 2 (hν 4m ec 2 ) (21) Nuclear screening occurs for hν > 20 MeV photons that interact with the nuclear Coloumb field outside the K-shell; effective nuclear field is screened by two K-shell electrons and the interaction cross section is reduced.

Example: For a 2 MeV photon, the average energy of charged particles resulting from pair production in the nuclear field is pp 1 E K = 2 (hν 2m ec 2 ) = 1 (2 MeV 1.022 MeV) 2 = 0.489 MeV = 0.245 hν and in the electron field, the average energy is E K tp = 0 because 2 MeV is less than the threshold energy 4m e c 2 = 2.04 MeV needed for triplet production.

Atomic cross section General form for pair production atomic cross section in field of nucleus or orbital electron is aκ = αr 2 ez 2 P(ε, Z) (22) P(ε, Z) = complicated function field energy P(ε, Z) 1. nucleus 1 ε (αz 1/3 ) 1 28 218 9 ln(2ε) 27 2. nucleus ε (αz 1/3 ) 1 28 9 ln(183z 1/3 ) 2 27 28 218 3. nucleus ε > 4 9 ln(2ε) 27 1.027 4. electron ε > 4 Z 1 [ 28 9 ln(2ε) 11.3] nuclear screening only important in case 2 ε > 4 in case 3 must lie outside the limits of cases 1 and 2

P(ε, Z) Z 1 for electron field triplet production usually makes negligible contribution to total cross section: aκ = a κ pp + a κ tp = a κ pp [ 1 + (ηz) 1 ) (23) where η 1 as hν Atomic cross sections for pair production (solid curves) and triplet production (dashed curves) for a high-z and low-z absorber. (Fig. 7.27 in Podgoršak.)

Total atomic cross sections for pair production (including triplet production) for different Z. (Fig. 7.28 in Podgoršak.)

mass attenuation coefficient for pair production: κ ρ = N A A a κ (24) mass energy transfer coefficient: ( ) κ = κ (EK) κ tr ρ tr ρ hν = κ ρ (1 2m ec 2 ) hν (25) Mass energy transfer coefficient (solid curves) and mass attenuation coefficient (dashed curves) for pair production. (Fig. 7.30 in Podgoršak.)

of Photon Interactions Tabulation of interactions and symbols used: electronic atomic linear cross cross attenuation section section coefficient [m 2 ] [m 2 ] [m 1 ] Thomson scattering eσ T a σ T σ T Rayleigh scattering aσ R σ R Compton scattering eσ C a σ C σ C Photoelectric effect aτ τ Pair production aκ pp κ pp Triplet production eκ tp a κ tp κ tp

Tabulation of attenuation coefficients: Total linear and mass attenuation coefficients are a sum of the partial linear and mass attenuation coefficients for individual photon interactions: µ = τ + σ R + σ C + κ (26) µ m = τ ρ + σ R ρ + σ C ρ + κ ρ Similarly, the total atomic cross section is (27) aµ = µ m A N A = a τ + a σ R + a σ C + a κ = Z e µ (28) where e µ = total electronic cross section.

For compounds or mixtures, the mass attenuation coefficient is a summation of a weighted average of its constituents: µ i µ m = Σ i w i (29) ρ where w i = proportion by weight of i-th constituent. Example: Water, H 2 O, has w H = w O = 2 1.0079 2 1.0079 + 15.999 = 0.1119 15.999 2 1.0079 + 15.999 = 0.8881 For 1 MeV photons, µ H /ρ = 1.26 10 2 m 2 kg 1 and µ O /ρ = 6.37 10 3 m 2 kg 1 (data from the NIST/Xcom database), so µ ρ 7.07 10 3 m 2 kg 1

Comparison of the three main photon energy transfer processes: photoelectric effect dominates at low hν and high Z pair production dominates at high hν and high Z Compton scattering dominates over a broad range in hν for low/moderate Z (including water and tissue)

Energy transfer coefficient is the sum of the partial energy transfer coefficients for the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering and pair production: µ tr = µ E tr hν E σ tr = τ Eτ tr hν + σ C hν + κeκ tr hν = τ f τ + σ C f σ + κ f κ (30) where each f is the average fraction of incident photon energy hν transferred to electrons by the corresponding physical process, with f τ = 1 P Kω K hν K hν f σ = Eσ tr hν f κ = 1 2m ec 2 hν (31) (32) (33)

What is the dominant photon interaction?