Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics (FYSH551), May 31, 2013 Jan Rak and Thorsten Renk

Similar documents
Review of collective flow at RHIC and LHC

QGP Physics from Fixed Target to LHC

Elliptic flow. p y. Non-central collision of spherical nuclei or central collision of deformed nuclei. Overlapping zone is of almond shape

Heavy Ion Physics Lecture 3: Particle Production

Theory English (Official)

1 The pion bump in the gamma reay flux

Hints of incomplete thermalization in RHIC data

Introduction to Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics

Quark-Gluon Plasma in Proton-Proton Scattering at the LHC?

Accelerators and Colliders

Investigation of jet quenching and elliptic flow within a pqcd-based partonic transport model

J/Ψ-suppression in the hadron resonance gas

Stefano Carignano 12/2010. Phenomenology of particle production in pp collisions

INITIAL ENERGY DENSITY IN P+P AND A+A COLLISIONS UNIVERSE 3 (2017) 1, 9 ARXIV: MANUSCRIPT IN PREPARATION

Soft physics results from the PHENIX experiment

What is a heavy ion? Accelerator terminology: Any ion with A>4, Anything heavier than α-particle

Azimuthal anisotropy of the identified charged hadrons in Au+Au collisions at S NN. = GeV at RHIC

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Equilibration and decoupling of a relativistic gas in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime

Proton-lead measurements using the ATLAS detector

Investigation of jet quenching and elliptic flow within a pqcd-based partonic transport model

Introduction to Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics

Heavy Ions at the LHC: First Results

Thermalization of Color Glass Condensate within Partonic Cascade BAMPS and Comparison with Bottom-Up Scenario.

Predictions for hadronic observables from. from a simple kinematic model

EPOS 2 and LHC Results

Figure 1: Grad, Div, Curl, Laplacian in Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates. Here ψ is a scalar function and A is a vector field.

PoS(DIS2017)208. Nuclear PDF studies with proton-lead measurements with the ALICE detector

Strangeness production and nuclear modification at LHC energies

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department. Physics 8.20 IAP 2005 Special Relativity January 28, 2005 FINAL EXAM

PHY397K - NUCLEAR PHYSICS - 2

Jet and Minijet Contributions to Transverse Momentum Correlations in High Energy Collisions

Lecture 3. Experimental Methods & Feynman Diagrams

Hydrodynamical description of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

Units. In this lecture, natural units will be used:

Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy-ion physics

Elliptic flow of D mesons in Pb-Pb collision for ALICE

The effect of the spectator charge on the charged pion spectra in peripheral ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

High-p T Neutral Pion Production in Heavy Ion Collisions at SPS and RHIC

arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 2 Jul 2008

DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING

The direct photon puzzle

Exploring quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Jet Physics with ALICE

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2012

The Quark-Gluon Plasma and the ALICE Experiment

Constraining the QCD equation of state in hadron colliders

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Predictions for 5.02A TeV Pb+Pb Collisions from A Multi-Phase Transport Model

Studies of QCD Matter From E178 at NAL to CMS at LHC

Zhaozhong Shi. Undergraduate Honors Thesis. Submitted for the degree of. Bachelor of Arts. Department of Physics. University of California, Berkeley

Can hadronic rescattering explain the jet quenching at relativistic energies?

The ALICE experiment at LHC. Experimental conditions at LHC The ALICE detector Some physics observables Conclusions

Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ions

Decay rates and Cross section. Ashfaq Ahmad National Centre for Physics

Studying the QCD Medium in Proton-Proton Collisions Using PYTHIA

Low mass dileptons from Pb + Au collisions at 158 A GeV

Ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions: Lecture I

Monte Carlo Non-Linear Flow modes studies with AMPT

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 Jan 2016

Selected Topics in the Theory of Heavy Ion Collisions Lecture 3

Ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions and Production of Hot Fireballs at SPS/RHIC

Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the ATLAS detector

Recent Results from RHIC: On the trail of the Quark-Gluon Plasma

Bulk matter formed in Pb Pb collisions at the LHC

Search for Quark Substructure in 7 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector

A Senior Honors Thesis

Quark Gluon Plasma Recent Advances

Evidence for hadronic deconfinement in p p collisions at 1.8 TeV

Partonic transport simulations of jet quenching

Duke University Chiho NONAKA. in Collaboration with R. J. Fries (Duke), S. A. Bass (Duke & RIKEN), B. Muller (Duke) nucl-th/ to appear in PRL

51st Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions La Thiule, IT 25/Mar/2016. Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez

Q a u r a k k m a m t a t t e t r e p r p ob o e b d e d b y b y di d l i e l p e t p o t n o s

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

67. W.M. Snow et al. (M. Sarsour), NSR collaboration, Parity violating neutron spin rotation in He-4 and H., Nuovo Cim. C035N04, (2012).

arxiv:hep-ph/ v3 2 Jan 2001

Heavy quark and quarkonium evolutions in heavy ion collisions

Global Properties of Nucleus Nucleus Collisions

Inclusive spectrum of charged jets in central Au+Au collisions at s NN = 200 GeV by STAR

Subatomic Physics: Particle Physics Study Guide

Introduction to particle physics Lecture 7

Perturbative origin of azimuthal anisotropy in nuclear collisions

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

2. HEAVY QUARK PRODUCTION

NEW EXACT AND PERTURBTIVE SOLUTIONS OF RELATIVISTIC HYDRO A COLLECTION OF RECENT RESULTS

Tutorial on Top-Quark Physics

Collider overview and kinematics

arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 11 Jul 2014

High Energy Physics. Lecture 9. Deep Inelastic Scattering Scaling Violation. HEP Lecture 9 1

Probing the QCD phase diagram with dileptons a study using coarse-grained transport dynamics

Results with Hard Probes High p T Particle & Jet Suppression from RHIC to LHC

Graduate Written Examination Spring 2014 Part I Thursday, January 16th, :00am to 1:00pm

Jet Medium Interactions

Virtual photon polarization and dilepton anisotropy in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions

Sub-hadronic degrees of freedom in ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions at RHIC and beyond

Lecture 3 Cross Section Measurements. Ingredients to a Cross Section

Phenomenology of Heavy-Ion Collisions

QCD at LHC in pp. Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University

+ High p T with ATLAS and CMS in Heavy-Ion 2.76TeV

Transcription:

Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics (FYSH551), May 31, 2013 Jan Rak and Thorsten Renk Final Exam Instructions: Please write clearly. Do not just answer the questions, but document the thoughts leading to the answer. You may use any approximation in a calculation, provided you can explain why you use it and provided it does not alter the final result substantially. If you computed a result in two different ways which contradict each other, cross one out otherwise none can be graded (to avoid guesswork). Allowed tools: Pocket calculator, standard collections of mathematical and physical formulae. Table 1: 45 points over 20 questions. Minimum to pass this test is 30 points. Two additional questions 2e and 6a are for extra 3 points each. 1a 1b 1c 1d 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 3a 3b 3d 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 4a 4b 4c 4d 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 6a 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3

1. LHC accelerator The LHC ring of 26,659 m circumference accelerates proton to a 4 TeV energy at bunch collision rate of 40 MHz. This means that protons are grouped in 3564 bunches per orbit with 1.2 10 11 protons/bunch. However, in reality only 2808 bunches are used (safety reasons). The beam parameters like emittance (transverse size) and β parameter (longitudinal size) determine the average interaction probability, µ = P (n p+p coll > 0), per one bunch crossing. For the bunch intensity N b = 1.2 10 11 p/bunch the measured interaction rate is µ=0.06 interactions/bunch. (a) What is the velocity of 1 tone vehicle having the same kinetic energy of all protons orbiting in LHC? (b) Calculate the trigger rate (assume 100% trigger efficiency) for µ=6% and the 75ns bunch crossing gap filling scheme. (c) What is the fraction of pileup events (pileup means more than one proton proton collision within one bunch crossing) in the triggered event sample with the 75ns gap filling scheme? (d) What is the beam rapidity? 2. Particle kinematics Investigate the rapidity density distribution of emitted protons of transverse momentum p T =1 GeV/c and π 0 (m π0 = 134 MeV/c 2 ) decay. (a) The rapidity density distribution of 1 GeV/c transverse momentum protons at midrapidity dn proton /dy y=0 =1. What is the corresponding value of the pseudorapity density dn proton /dη η=0? (b) Sketch the dn proton /dy and dn proton /dη in the case of s LHC =8 TeV proton-proton collisions. (c) Calculate the c.m. energy s SPS of the SPS fixed-target experiment with E SPS,beam = 450 GeV/c. Sketch the net-baryon rapidity density dn p p /dy in the case of slhc and s SPS. (d) Consider π 0 2γ decay. Let θ be angle between z axis and momentum of the photon in the π 0 rest frame (see left Fig. 1). Let us denote E±, E ± photons energies in the rest and lab frame respectively and define asymmetry parameter α = E + E E + + E (1) Calculate decay photon energies (E ± ) in the Lab frame and show that the angle θ between photon and π 0 momentum is cos θ = cos θ + β 1 + β cos θ, Page 2

where β is the velocity of π 0. (e) Calculate the opening angle, φ, distribution for π 0 of energy E π decaying to the photon pairs of asymmetry α. m E π + = 2 E + * θ φ π 0 E - Rest Frame Lab Frame Figure 1: π 0 2γ in the π 0 rest frame (left) and in the Lab frame (right). 3. Elliptic flow The azimuthal distribution of particles emerging from the non-central A A collision can be expressed using the Fourier expansion E d3 N dp = 1 d 2 N [1 + ] 3 2π p T dp T dy 2v n(p T ) cos n(ϕ ψ n ) (2) n=1 where ψ n represents the reaction plane angle and v n (p T ) are the Fourier coefficients characterizing the particle production anisotropy in the momentum space. Consider the case when all v n = 0 except v 2. Then (2) reduces to where C is the normalization constant. dn dφ = C [1 + 2v 2 cos 2(ϕ ψ 2 )] (3) (a) How would you extract the v 2 coefficient from the data (follows eq. (3))? (b) Assume you have measured the two-particle φ = φ i φ j distribution dn 2 /d φ where the only source of correlation is the v 2 > 0 as above. How would you write the pair double differential distribution dn 2 /d φ as a function of φ angle? How would you extract the v 2 coefficient in this case? (c) Assume the only particles you detect are the decay photons π 0 2γ and you know the second Fourier coefficient v2 π0 of π 0 production. What do you expect for the measured anisotropy of decay photons v γ 2? Should be the v γ 2 value (i) larger (v γ 2 > v2 π0 ) or (ii) smaller (v γ 2 < v2 π0 )? Explain your choice. Page 3

4. Hydrodynamical expansion Consider two systems, each at initial time τ 0 = 1 fm in a cylindrical volume of radius R 0 = 6 fm and extending from η = 1 to η = +1 in spacetime rapidity. The single species of particles in the system is massless, the momentum k distribution isotropic and the distribution function is f B (E k ) = exp[ E k /T 0 ] where E k = k and T 0 = 300 MeV. (a) Compute the initial rapidity distribution dn/dy of particles! (b) In one of the systems the particles do not interact, in the other they form a thermodynamical system with an equation of state ɛ = 3p. Both systems expand in longitudinal direction only with the speed of light, i.e. the volume V is proportional to proper time τ; the thermal system shows scaling flow y = η. How does the energy density ɛ in each of the systems evolve as a function of proper time τ? Explain the difference! (c) At time τ = 10 fm, consider only particles in a small interval dη around midrapidity η = 0. What is the rapidity distribution dn/dy of particles from this subvolume for each of the two systems now? (d) The dilepton emission rate in the thermal system is given by dn dtd 3 xded 3 p = 1 α 1 12π 4 M 2 exp(e/t ) 1 Im[Πret µ µ (E, p)], Assuming you can neglect Im[Π ret µ µ (E, p)] (i.e. set it to 1), determine the relative strength of dilepton emission at the ρ peak (M = 770 MeV) for low P T = 100 MeV and high P T = 1 GeV at τ = 1 fm and τ = 10 fm. Give an interpretation of the result. Name at least one effect not considered in this estimate. 5. Energy loss and nuclear suppression factor Consider a cylindrical volume of radius R = 5 fm is homogeneously filled with a free ideal gluon gas of T = 500 MeV. A gluon starts from the center and crosses the volume. The gluon is on an eikonal trajectory at midrapidity. Its mean free path is 0.5 fm. (a) Estimate the scattering cross section for the gluon from the given information! (b) By what approximate factor would the mean free path of a quark be different and why? (c) Assume that the pqcd parton production spectrum follows a power law dn/dp T 1/p 5 T and consider final state gluons at 10 GeV after the medium. Assume further that the gluon loses a given fraction z of its energy in each scattering. What is z if the observed nuclear suppression factor R AA (10 GeV) = 0.3? Page 4

(d) A real system is not a static cylinder. Assume T = 500 MeV holds at τ = 1fm and the system expands in a Bjorken hydrodynamical evolution. How does this change the estimate for the average energy fraction lost per scattering? (e) Explain the role of coherence in a more realistic picture and argue why this leads to an energy loss proportional to L 2 where L is the medium length. (f) (difficult) Assume parton production points in the transverse plane are distributed by with a probability density P (r) exp[ r2 ] and no partons are produced (R/2) 2 outside the medium. How would you estimate the radius r 0 at which most of the observed gluons at 10 GeV are produced? (Hint: You do not need to solve the resulting expression for a number. It is helpful to consider only gluons propagating radially outward - but explain why!) 6. Hadronic Thermodynamics Before Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) was established as the theory of strong interactions, it was conjectured that there is a limiting temperature for any hot hadronic system, the so-called Hagedorn temperature. Explain the physics behind this idea, especially how there can be a highest possible temperature, and explain how QCD changed the picture. Page 5

Supplementary ev 1.602 10 19 J. Poisson distribution Lorentz Transformation where η = γβ. E p T p = P (n) = λn n! e λ γ 0 η 0 1 0 η 0 γ E p T p (5) Rapidity ( ) E + p y = ln m T E = m T cosh y = 1 ( ) E + 2 ln p E p p = m T sinh y Pseudorapidity: In the limit β 1, rapidity y pseudorapidity η η = 1 ( ) 1 + cos θ 2 ln = 1 ( ) p + 1 cos θ 2 ln pl = ln tan θ p p L 2 p = p T cosh η p L = p T sinh η Trigonometry: cos(α + β) = cos α cos β sin α sin β. Integrals K n (z) = 0 0 e z cosh t cosh(nt)dt π 2z e z (1 +... ) I 0 (z) = 1 2π e z cos φ dφ 2π 0 ( x x 2 e ax dx = e ax 2 a 2x a + 2 ) 2 a 3 x n e ax dx = Γ(n + 1) a n+1 for a > 0, n > 1 Page 6