Flow Harmonic Probability Distribution in Heavy Ion Collision

Similar documents
Review of collective flow at RHIC and LHC

MIXED HARMONIC FLOW CORRELATIONS

Uncertainties in the underlying e-by-e viscous fluid simulation

Hydrodynamic response to initial state fluctuations

Global and Collective Dynamics at PHENIX

arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 6 Dec 2011

Event by Event Flow in ATLAS and CMS

Soft Physics in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

The Little Bang Standard Model

Heavy Ions at the LHC: First Results

Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collision Results

Overview of anisotropic flow measurements from ALICE

The Core Corona Model

A Standard Model for the Little Bang How far are we from the goal?

Hints of incomplete thermalization in RHIC data

Monte Carlo Non-Linear Flow modes studies with AMPT

Collective and non-flow correlations in event-by-event hydrodynamics

Jet quenching in pa and AA

Correlations & Fluctuations in Large & Small Systems

arxiv: v2 [nucl-ex] 8 Sep 2016

First results with heavy-ion collisions at the LHC with ALICE

The unreasonable effectiveness of hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions

Overview of flow results from ALICE experiment

Comparing Initial Conditions in a (3+1)d Boltzmann + Hydrodynamics Transport Approach

Selected Topics in the Theory of Heavy Ion Collisions Lecture 1

Event anisotropy at RHIC

Outline: Introduction and Motivation

Soft physics results from the PHENIX experiment

Anisotropic Flow: from RHIC to the LHC

Current Status of QGP hydro + hadron cascade approach

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v1 10 May 2004

Overview of heavy ion CMS results

Event-by-event distribution of azimuthal asymmetries in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

Event geometrical anisotropy and fluctuation viewed by HBT interferometry

Extracting ˆq from single inclusive data at RHIC and at the LHC for different centralities: a new puzzle?

Throwing triangles against a wall

51st Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions La Thiule, IT 25/Mar/2016. Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez

Beam energy scan using a viscous hydro+cascade model: an update

Summary of flow and its correlation in ALICE

Collective Dynamics of the p+pb Collisions

Lecture 12: Hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions. Elliptic flow Last lecture we learned:

Azimuthal angle dependence of HBT radii with respect to the Event Plane in Au+Au collisions at PHENIX

Flow of strange and charged particles in ppb and PbPb collisions at LHC energies

arxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 24 Sep 2012

Constraining the bulk viscosity of QCD

Hydrodynamical description of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions

Results with Hard Probes High p T Particle & Jet Suppression from RHIC to LHC

Flow analysis in CBM experiment at FAIR

arxiv: v2 [nucl-ex] 15 Jun 2011

Measurement of Quenched Energy Flow for Dijets in PbPb collisions with CMS

Azimuthal anisotropy of the identified charged hadrons in Au+Au collisions at S NN. = GeV at RHIC

Space-time evolution of the Quark Gluon Plasma. Klaus Reygers / Kai Schweda Physikalisches Institut University of Heidelberg

UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI CATANIA INFN-LNS. inziale nel plasma creato nelle collisioni ad energie ultra-relativistiche

Strangeness production and nuclear modification at LHC energies

Exploring quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Fluid dynamic propagation of initial baryon number perturbations

arxiv: v2 [nucl-ex] 30 Oct 2008

Predictions for hadronic observables from. from a simple kinematic model

Small Collision Systems at RHIC

Quark-Gluon Plasma in Proton-Proton Scattering at the LHC?

Elliptic flow. p y. Non-central collision of spherical nuclei or central collision of deformed nuclei. Overlapping zone is of almond shape

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 2012

Flow in p-pb collisions at 5 TeV?

1 Introduction. EPJ Web of Conferences 95, (2015)

Equilibration and decoupling of a relativistic gas in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime

Collision Geometry and Flow in Uranium+Uranium Collisions

Measurement of inclusive charged jet production in pp and Pb-Pb

In-Medium Energy Loss and Correlations in Pb-Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV with ALICE

et Experiments at LHC

Highlights from the ATLAS experiment

Pion Transverse Momentum Spectrum, Elliptic Flow and Interferometry in the Granular Source Model in Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

Beam energy scan using a viscous hydro+cascade model

Initial Condition Fluctuations for Heavy Ion Collisions

Status of Heavy-Ion Physics at the LHC

Bulk matter formed in Pb Pb collisions at the LHC

Flow Results and Hints of Incomplete Thermalization

Recent flow results at RHIC

QCD Studies with CMS at LHC. Gunther Roland for the Collaboration

+ High p T with ATLAS and CMS in Heavy-Ion 2.76TeV

Strongly interacting quantum fluids: Experimental status

Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics (FYSH551), May 31, 2013 Jan Rak and Thorsten Renk

Hadronic equation of state and relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Measurement of muon tagged open heavy flavor production in Pb+Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV with ATLAS

Final source eccentricity measured by HBT interferometry with the event shape selection

Jet fragmentation study with particle correlations from the ALICE experiment at the LHC

Intersections of nuclear physics and cold atom physics

Creating a Quark Gluon Plasma With Heavy Ion Collisions

Nearly Perfect Fluidity: From Cold Atoms to Hot Quarks. Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University

ELLIPTIC FLOW FROM THERMAL AND KLN INITIAL CONDITIONS

Parton dynamics in heavy-ion collisions from FAIR to LHC

Small systems Resonances hadronic phase partonic phase?

Introduction to WG5: high multiplicities and interactions with nuclei

HIGH ENERGY HEAVY ION COLLISIONS AT LHC

Initial baryon number fluctuations and its hydrodynamic propagation on a Bjorken background

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 2 Mar 2015

The Latest (Pb+Pb results) from

Jet Physics with ALICE

Multiplicity dependence of charged pion, kaon, and (anti)proton production at large transverse momentum in p-pb collisions at 5.

Jets, flows and Joseph Fourier

arxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 17 Jun 2015

Transcription:

1/28 Flow Harmonic Probability Distribution in Heavy Ion Collision Seyed Farid Taghavi Institute For Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran Second Iran & Turkey Joint Conference on LHC Physics October 23-26, 217 (1-4 Aban 1396)

2/28 Outline Standard Model of Heavy Ion Collision Event-By-Event Fluctuations and Flow Harmonics Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Flow Harmonic Probability Distributions Conclusions

Standard Model of Heavy Ion Collision Figure from: Sorensen, arxiv: 95.174 3/28

4/28 Why We Believe the Quark-Gluon Plasma Is There? Quark-Gluon Plasma Diagnostics Flow Harmonics, v 2, v 3,... Strangeness Enhancement Jet Quenching J/Ψ Suppression

Standard Model of Heavy Ion Collision Event-By-Event Fluctuations Before studying the hydro evolution... 27 #1 Pb, SNN = 2.76 TeV, #2 b = 4.5 fm #3 5/28

Standard Model of Heavy Ion Collision From Initial states to Final Hadrons Initial State Freeze Out Hydrodynamic Evolution Observation In Detector The initial state evolves by hydrodynamic equations, where µ T µν = T µν = (ɛ + P)u µ u ν + Pη µν + τ µν τ µν = η s µα νβ ( αu β + β u α) (ζ 23 ) ηs µν αu α µν = η µν + u µ u ν, η µν = diag( 1, 1, 1, 1). 6/28

Event-By-Event Fluctuations and Flow Harmonics How to Quantify the Initial State Systematically [PHOBOS Collaboration, 27], [Teaney, Yan, PRC, 211] Dipole Asymmetry, ε1 Eccentricity, ε2 Triangularity, ε3... R εn,x +iεn,y ( n = ε2,x = Ψ2 rdrdϕ ρ(r, ϕ) rn einϕ R, rdrdϕ ρ(r, ϕ) rn Ψ3 3 if n = 1. 1 if n 2 hx 2 Y 2 i, hx 2 + Y 2 i ε2,y = 2hX Yi. hx 2 + Y 2 i 7/28

8/28 Event-By-Event Fluctuations and Flow Harmonics Event-By-Event Fluctuations [Borghini, Dinh, Ollitrault, 2] Fourier analysis of azimuthal distribution of emitted particles. 2π N dn dφ = 1 + 2v n cos [n(φ ψ n )], n=1 v n e inψn e inφ dφ dn dφ einφ. In different events Ψ 2 Ψ 2 Ψ 2 Ψ 2

Event-By-Event Fluctuations and Flow Harmonics Flow Harmonics, n-particle Correlation Function [Borghini, Dinh, Ollitrault, 2] Define 2-particle correlation function c n {2} = e in(φ 1 φ 2 ) single then many events Instead of using e inφ we use c n {2}, dφ 1 dφ 2 ( dn dφ 1 dφ 2 ) ( e in(φ 1 φ 2 ) ( ) ) ( dn dφ 1 e inφ 1 dφ 1 ( ) ) dn dφ 2 e inφ 2 dφ 2 v 2 n As a result v 2 n{2} = c n {2} 9/28

Event-By-Event Fluctuations and Flow Harmonics Flow Harmonics, n-particle Correlation Function [Borghini, Dinh, Ollitrault, 2], [Borghini, Dinh, Ollitrault, 21] Generalizing the 2-Particle to n-particle Correlation Function c n {2} = e in(φ 1 φ 2 ), c n {4} = e in(φ 1+φ 2 φ 3 φ 4 ) 2 e in(φ 1 φ 2 ) 2, It is shown that v 2 n{2} = c n {2}, v 4 n{4} = c n {4}, v 6 n{6} = c n {6}/4, Spliting in v n {2k} CMS Preliminary PbPb 5.2 TeV v 2 {2k}.12.1.8.6.4.2.3 < p T η < 1. STAR < 3. GeV/c v 2 {2k} k = 1 k = 2 k = 3 k = 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Centrality % v 3.1.5 ATLAS Pb+Pb s NN = 2.76 TeV 1-1 L int = 7 µb, η < 2.5 v 3 {EP} v 3 {2} v 3 {4} -25% 5 1 15 2 25-6% 5 1 15 2 p [GeV] T 1/28

11/28 Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Heavy Ion Collision Event Generator, iebe-vishnu [Shen, Qiu, Song, Bernhard, Bass, Heinz, 214] The full process is too complicated and numerical calculations are needed. supermc Initial condition generator M initial conditions VISHNew Hydrodynamics Hydrodynamic! simulator freeze-out surface info iss Particle emission sampler no Particle space-time and momentum info (multiple times) Finished all events? yes binutilities Spectra and Particle spacetime and flow calculator momentum info osc2u prepare UrQMD ICs UrQMD Hadron rescattering simulator EbeCollector Collect data into SQLite database zip zip results and store in to results folder

Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Event Generation I Pb-Pb collision in SNN = 2.76 TeV: 14 for centralities between to 8% (b to b r ). I η/s =.8, τ =.6 fm I supermc: MC-Glauber #1 #2 #3 5-55% centralities dnevents /dεn,x dεn,y 2 18.6 16.6 16.4 14.4 12.2 1 12 1 8.2 12.2 ε3,y.2 1 8 ε4,y 18.4 14 ε2,y 16.6 8.2 6.2 6 4 6.4 4.4 4.4.6 2.6 2.6.6.4.2 ε2,x.2.4.6 14.6.4.2.2 ε3,x.4.6 2.6.4.2.2 ε4,x.4.6 12/28

13/28 Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Cumulant Analysis of the Initial and Flow Distribution We use a 2D cumulant analysis.

13/28 Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Cumulant Analysis of the Initial and Flow Distribution We use a 2D cumulant analysis. The generating functional is log e ξxkx+ξyky = m,n= k m x k n y m!n! A mn.

13/28 Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Cumulant Analysis of the Initial and Flow Distribution We use a 2D cumulant analysis. The generating functional is log e ξxkx+ξyky = m,n= k m x k n y m!n! A mn. We define the standardized cumulants as follows A mn  mn = A m 2 A n 2

Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Cumulant Analysis of the Initial and Flow Distribution We use a 2D cumulant analysis. The generating functional is log e ξxkx+ξyky = m,n= k m x k n y m!n! A mn. We define the standardized cumulants as follows A mn  mn = A m 2 A n 2 The cumulant of the 2D distribution of (v n,x, v n,y ) averaged over azimuthal angle c n {2k} c n {2k} and A kl are related to each other. e.g. c n {2} = A 2 1 + A 2 1 + A 2 + A 2 13/28

14/28 Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Cumulant Analysis of the Initial and Flow Distribution Ê (n) kl normalized cumulants from ε n ˆV(n) kl normalized cumulants from v n For n = 2, 3, The Hydrodynamic Response is Almost Linear [Teaney, Yan, PRC, 211], [Luzum, Ollitrault,...] v n α n ε n 2 2.6 18.6 18 ε2,y.4.2.2.4 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 v2,y/αn.4.2.2.4 16 14 12 1 8 6 4.6 2.6 2 ε 2,x.6.4.2.2.4.6 v 2,x /α n.6.4.2.2.4.6 Ê (n) pq ˆV (n) pq

15/28 Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Connection With Experimental Observation ˆV (2) Recall 3 Ê(2) 3 is skewness. It is shown that the skewness [Giacalone,Ollitrault,Yan, Noronha-Hostler, PRC,216] exp 1 γ.4.2 CMS Preliminary PbPb 5.2 TeV < 3. GeV/c T.3 < p η < 1. v 2 {4} v 2 {6} = V 3 3V 2 1 ˆV (2) 3 6 2v 2 2 {4}(v 2{4} v 2 {6}) [ v 2 2 {2} v 2 2 {4}] 3/2 and a constraint v 2 {4} = 12v 2 {6} 11v 2 {8}..2.4.6.8 γ exp 1 2.76 TeV Hydro 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Centrality %

16/28 Standardized Cumulants of Flow Harmonic Fluctuations Kurtosis of the Third Flow Harmonics [Abbasi,Allahbakhshi,Davody,SFT,217] For n = 3: c 3 {2} α 2 2 c 3 {4} α 4 2 = E 2 +E 2 = E 4 +2E 22 +E 4 Γ 2q 2 = cn{2q} c q n{2} Γ 2 = ( ) 4 v3 {4} v 3 {2}

17/28 Flow Harmonic Probability Distributions Different Analytical Distributions ε2,y.6.4.2.2.4.6 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 ε3,y.2.2 ε 2,x.2 ε 3,x.6.4.4.6.6.4.2.4.6.6.4.2.2.4.6 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Two Dimensional Gaussian Distribution p(ε n,x, ε n,y) = [ ] 1 exp (εn,x ε ) 2 2πσ xσ y 2σx 2 ε2 n,x 2σy 2 Elliptic-Power Distribution [Yan, Ollitrault, Poskanzer, PRC, 214] p(ε n,x, ε n,y) = α π (1 ε2 )α+1/2 (1 ε2 n,x ε 2 n,y) α 1 (1 ε ε n,x) 2α+1.

Flow Harmonic Probability Distributions Integration Over Azimuthal Direction Bessel-Gaussian [Voloshin, Poskanzer, Tang, Wang, PLB, 28] 3 2.5 2 ε 2 (a) [ p(ε n) = εn σ 2 exp ε2 n + ] ( ) ε2 ε ε n 2σ 2 I σ 2 P(ε 2 ) 1.5 1.5 2 ε 3 (b) Elliptic-Power [Yan, Ollitrault, Poskanzer, PRC, 214] P(ε 3 ) 1.5 1.5 p(ε n) = 2αε n(1 ε 2 n )α 1 (1 ε 2 )α+1/2 1 π (1 ε ε n cos ϕ) 2α 1 dϕ π Power (for odd n) [Yan, Ollitrault, PRL, 214] 2αε n(1 ε 2 n) α 1 P(ε 4 ) 2 1.5 1.5 ε 4 (c) Power Elliptic Power Bessel-Gaussian.2.4.6.8 1 ε n 75%-8% Centrality [Yan, Ollitrault, Poskanzer, PRC, 214] 18/28

Flow Harmonic Probability Distributions A New Distribution 2D Gram-Charlier A Series P(ξ x, ξ y) 1 + H 2π e (ξx A 1 ) 2 (ξy A 1 )2 2A 2 2A 2 A 2 A 2 where H = Â mn m!n! Hen( ξx A 1 )He m( ξy A 1 ) A2 A2 m=n=1, m+n 3 Integrate Over Azimuthal Direction Radial-Gram-Charlier p(v 3 ) = [ 1 + Γ 2 L 2 ( v2 3 c 3 {2} ) + Γ 4 6 L 3 ( v2 3 c 3 {2} ) + ] [ ] 2v 3 exp c 3 v2 3 {2} c 3 {2} Γ 2q 2 = c 3 {2q}/c q 3 {2}, ( ) 4 Γ v 3 {4} 2 = v 2 3 {2} 19/28

2/28 Flow Harmonic Probability Distributions Radial-Gram-Charlier Fit p T dependence of standardized radial cumulants. Flow and non-flow effects?!

Flow Harmonic Probability Distributions Work On Progress Bessel-Gaussian [ p(v n) = vn σ 2 exp v2 n + ] ( ) v2 v v n 2σ 2 I σ 2 RGC (I n = I n(v v n/σ 2 )) p(v n ) = (Q + q 2 Q 2 + q 4 Q 4 + q 6 Q 6 + ) ( v n ) [ ] σ exp v2 2 n +v2 2σ 2 Considering 2σ 2 v 2 n {2} v2 Q = I, [ ] vn Q 2 = I + v I 1, [ ] [ ] 2 vn vn Q 4 = 2I 4 I 1 +2 I 2, v v [ ] [ ] 2 [ ] 3 vn vn vn Q 6 = 6I +18 I 1 18 I 2 +6 I 3, v v v q 2 =, q 4 = 1 4 q 6 = 1 18 [ v 4 n {4} v 4 (v 2 n {2} v2 )2 [ 2v 6 n {6} 3v 2 v4 n {4} + ] v6 ], (v 2 n {2} v2 )3 21/28

Flow Harmonic Probability Distributions Validity Checks p(vn) 1 8 6 4 2 5-55% centralities Q Q 4 Q 6 Q 8 Ellip.-Power..5.1.15.2.25.3 Fine-splitting: [Miller,Snellings,23],[Giacalone,Ollitrault,Yan, Noronha-Hostler, PRC,216] Using the approximation v v n{4} leads to q 4 = and q 6 γ 1 v n q 8 11(v 2 {6} v 2 {8}) (v 2 {4} v 2 {6}) q 1 higher fine splittings 22/28

23/28 Conclusions Conclusions The distribution of v 3 has kurtosis. Its value is obtained by (v 3 {4}/v 3 {2}) 4. Does its p T dependence has any physical significances? A new distribution (RGC) for p(v 3 ) is introduced. The standardized cumulants are appeared as coefficients in a expansion and can be found by fitting. Generalization of RGC to arbitrary n The fine splitting of v 2 {2k} are related to RGC (n = 2) expansion coefficients.

24/28 Conclusions Thank You!

BACKUP 25/28

26/28 Conclusions For n = 2 [Ollitrault,PRC,216]

27/28 Conclusions For n = 3

Conclusions 28/28