Rare Decays at the Tevatron

Similar documents
Rare B Meson Decays at Tevatron

B physics: new states, rare decays and branching ratios in CDF

First two sided limit on BR(B s μ + μ - ) Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin Madison SUSY M. Herndon, SUSY

First two sided limit on BR(B s µ + µ - ) Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin Madison SUSY M. Herndon, SUSY

Searches for BSM Physics in Rare B-Decays in ATLAS

B the Tevatron

Search for B (s,d) μμ in LHCb

Rare B decays in ATLAS and CMS

B-physics with ATLAS and CMS

Search for the very rare decays B s/d + - at LHCb

PoS(FPCP2009)013. Fabrizio Scuri I.N.F.N. - Sezione di Pisa - Italy

Rare decays at LHCb Siim Tolk (NIKHEF, Amsterdam) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration

Studies of rare B meson decays with the CMS detector

Text. Decays of heavy flavour hadrons measured by CMS and ATLAS. M.Smizanska, Lancaster University

Some Thoughts on What Else to Trigger with the FTK

SUSY at Accelerators (other than the LHC)

SUSY at Accelerators (other than the LHC)

Search for Resonant Slepton Production with the DØ-Experiment

LHCb New B physics ideas

PoS(ICHEP2012)238. Search for B 0 s µ + µ and other exclusive B decays with the ATLAS detector. Paolo Iengo

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. Rare B decays at CMS

BABAR results on Lepton Flavour Violating (LFV) searches for τ lepton + pseudoscalar mesons & Combination of BABAR and BELLE LFV limits

LHCb: first results and prospects for the run

New Physics search in penguin B-decays

Recent Results from the Tevatron

First two-sided limit of the B s µ + µ decay rate

Feasibility of a cross-section measurement for J/ψ->ee with the ATLAS detector

b hadron properties and decays (ATLAS)

Walter Hopkins. February

Searches for New Phenomena with Lepton Final States at the Tevatron

Weak Decays, CKM, Anders Ryd Cornell University

Recent results from rare decays

Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories

Discovery searches for light new physics with BaBar

Rare decays of beauty mesons

The X(3872) at the Tevatron

Bs studies at a SuperB: physics case and experimental potentialities

Rare b and c decays at LHCb

Update on Search for Resonant Slepton Production

LHCb Discovery potential for New Physics

ЭЛЕМЕНТАРНЫЕ ЧАСТИЦЫ И ПОЛЯ. c 2009 D. Martinez Santos * (onbehalfofthelhcbcollaboration)

Searches for Leptonic Decays of the B-meson at BaBar

Beauty physics with B s and Λ b

Highlights of top quark measurements in hadronic final states at ATLAS

new measurements of sin(2) & cos(2) at BaBar

Search for long-lived particles at CMS

Observation of the rare B 0 s µ + µ decay

SUSY Search Strategies at Atlas and CMS

Search for Resonant Slepton Production with DØ

Higgs and Z τ + τ in CMS

Measurement of the. Maren Ugland. Bergen group meeting

Measurements of the Masses, Mixing, and Lifetimes, of B Hadrons at the Tevatron

PoS(Kruger 2010)048. B X s/d γ and B X s/d l + l. Martino Margoni SLAC-PUB Universita di Padova and INFN

ωω: J. Albert Caltech March 24, 2006

Rare heavy flavor decays at ATLAS & CMS

LFV in Tau Decays: Results and Prospects at the LHC. Tau th International Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics Beijing September 22th, 2016

Tevatron Physics Prospects. Paul Grannis, for the CDF and DØ collaborations ICFA Seminar, Oct

2! s measurement using B 0 s J/"# at LHCb

Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, Flavour physics in the LHC era. An introduction. Clara Matteuzzi. INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca

Measurement of the Z ττ cross-section in the semileptonic channel in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector

HQL Virginia Tech. Bob Hirosky for the D0 Collaboration. Bob Hirosky, UNIVERSITY of VIRGINIA. 26May, 2016

Jet reconstruction in LHCb searching for Higgs-like particles

Rare B decay searches with BABAR using hadronic tag reconstruction

Heavy Flavour Physics at the LHC. Lessons from the first phase of the LHC DESY 27 September 2012

Inclusive SUSY Searches at CMS with Emphasis on Detector Systematics

Search for b Ø bz. CDF note Adam Scott, David Stuart UCSB. 1 Exotics Meeting. Blessing

CP Violation Studies at DØ

Beyond the Standard Model searches with top quarks at D0

Higgs Searches at CMS

J/ψ production related analysis at Belle

Reconstruction of. events in LHCb. Benjamin Carron

LHCb Physics and prospects. Stefano Perazzini On behalf of LHCb Collabora4on MENU nd June 2010

Search for B s µµγ in CMS

New physics searches via FCNC b s ll decays at ATLAS

Rare decays, radiative decays and b sll transitions at LHCb

Measurement of Фs, ΔΓs and Lifetime in Bs J/ψ Φ at ATLAS and CMS

Recent CP violation measurements. Advanced topics in Particle Physics: LHC physics, 2011 Jeroen van Tilburg 1/38

Inclusive top pair production at Tevatron and LHC in electron/muon final states

B Hadron lifetimes using a displaced track trigger

Rare Hadronic B decays at BaBar

LHCb results and prospects

Rare decays in the beauty, charm and strange sector

STATE OF HEAVY FLAVOR KAREN GIBSON, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

BSM at Belle: B K ℓ ℓ and search for leptonic B decays

Searches for Exotics in Upsilon Decays in BABAR

Outline: Introduction Search for new Physics Model driven Signature based General searches. Search for new Physics at CDF

SEARCH FOR 4 TH GENERATION QUARKS AT CMS

(Towards) First Physics with LHCb

Search for Pair Production of Stop Quarks Mimicking Top Event Signatures

Charmonium(-like) and Bottomonium(-like) States Results from Belle and BaBar

Hadronic Moments in Semileptonic B Decays from CDFII

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 7 Jul 2016

The Λ b 0 baryon at LHCb

Measurements of R K and R K* at LHCb

Recent Results on Rare B Decays from BaBar and Belle

Electroweak Physics at the Tevatron

Based on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009

Benjamin Carron Mai 3rd, 2004

VBF SM Higgs boson searches with ATLAS

LHCP conference Bologna, June 4th June 9th, 2018 Frédéric Machefert for the LHCb collaboration

Transcription:

Rare Decays at the Tevatron Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool for the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty 05 21 st June 2005

Outline Overall motivations 0 B d,s µ + µ Motivation CDF and D0 methods CDF and D0 results 0 B d,s µ + µ K + /K*/φ Motivation D0 sensitivity analysis For discussion of Charmless B decays see following talk by Simone Donati 2

Searching for New Physics Two ways to search for new physics: direct searches seek e.g. Supersymmetric particles indirect searches test for deviations from Standard Model predictions e.g. branching ratios In the absence of evidence for new physics set limits on model parameters BR(B µµ)<1x10-7 q q χ 0 2 Z* q χ 0 1 χ + W + l + l - l + ν Trileptons: 2fb -1 3

0 B d,s µ + µ 4

B µµ in the Standard Model In Standard Model FCNC decay B µµheavily suppressed Standard Model predicts BR( B s + µ µ ) = (3.4 ± 0.5) 10 9 A. Buras Phys. Lett. B 566,115 B d µµfurther suppressed by CKM coupling (V td /V ts ) 2 + BR( µ µ ) = (1.00 ± 0.14) 10 Both below sensitivity of Tevatron experiments B d Observe no events set limits on new physics Observe events clear evidence for new physics 10 5

B µµin New Physics Models SUSY could enhance BR by orders of magnitude MSSM: BR(B µµ) tan 6 β may be 100x Standard Model b RPV SUSY λ i23 ν λ i22 µ s µ R-parity violating SUSY: tree level diagram via sneutrino observe decay for low tan β msugra: B µµsearch complements direct SUSY searches Low tan β observation of trilepton events High tan β observation of B µµ Or something else! A. Dedes et al, hep-ph/0207026 6

The Challenge search region Large combinatorial background Key elements are determine efficiencies select discriminating variables estimate background 7

Methodology Search for muon pairs in B d /B s mass windows D0 search for only B s and correct for B d decays Approximately 360pb -1 (CDF) /300pb -1 (D0) integrated luminosity Unbiased optimisation, signal region blind Aim to measure BR or set limit BR( B s total + NBs αb + εb + fu + + + µ µ ) = BR( B J / ψk ) BR( J / ψ µ µ ) total N α ε f B+ Bs Bs s Reconstruct normalisation mode (B + J/ψ K + ) Construct discriminant to select B signal and suppress dimuon background (CDF) Use cuts analysis to suppress dimuon background (D0) Measure background Measure the acceptance and efficiency ratios 8

CDF D0 six dedicated rare B triggers using all chambers to η 1.1 excellent tracking four dedicated rare B triggers using all chambers to η 2.0 excellent muon coverage Central Muon Extension (0.6< η < 1.0) Central Muon Chambers ( η < 0.6) Use two types of muon pairs: central-central central-extension Muon Chambers ( η < 2.0) 9

Normalisation Mode (CDF) Reconstruct normalisation mode (B + J/ψ K + ) central-central muons 10

B µµ Optimisation (CDF) Chosen three primary discriminating variables: proper decay length (λ) cut λ = cl3 DM r p( B) vtx Pointing ( α) φ B φ vtx cut Isolation (Iso) Iso = p T pt ( B) i ( B) + p ( Ri < 1.0) T i 11

B µµ Optimisation (D0) Similar three primary discriminating variables signal background D0 use 2d lifetime variables instead of 3d Optimise using MC for signal, data sidebands for background Random grid search, optimising for 95% C.L. 12

Likelihood Ratio Discriminant (CDF) First iteration of analysis used standard cuts optimisation Second iteration uses the more powerful likelihood discriminant Psig ( xi) i L = Psig ( xi) + Pbkg( xi) i i: index over all discriminating variables P sig/bkg (x i ): probability for event to be signal / background for a given measured x i Obtain probably density functions of variables using background: Data sidebands signal: Pythia Monte Carlo sample i 13

Optimisation (CDF) Likelihood ratio discriminant: Optimise likelihood and p t (B) for best 90% C.L. limit Bayesian approach consider statistical and systematic errors Assume 1fb -1 integrated luminosity 14

Expected Background (CDF/D0) Extrapolate from data sidebands to obtain expected events CDF: Scale by the expected rejection from the likelihood ratio cut D0: Expected background: 0.81 ± 0.12 (central-central dimuon) 0.66 ± 0.13 (central-extended dimuon) Tested background prediction in several control regions and find good agreement Expected background: 4.3 ± 1.2 15

Unblinded Results (D0) Apply optimised cuts Unblinded results for B s µµ: Expected background:4.3± 1.2 Observed: 4 BR(B s µµ) < 3.0 10-7 @ 90% CL < 3.7 10-7 @ 95% CL 16

Unblinded Results (CDF) Results with p t (B)>4GeV cut applied, Likelihood cut at 0.99: No events found in B s or B d search windows in either muon pair type 17

Limits on BR(B d,s µµ) (CDF) BR(B s µµ) < 1.6 10-7 @ 90% CL < 2.1 10-7 @ 95% CL BR(B d µµ) < 3.9 10-8 @ 90% CL < 5.1 10-8 @ 95% CL These are currently world best limits The future for CDF: use optimisation for 1fb -1 need to reoptimise at 1fb-1 for best results assume linear background scaling now 18

0 B d,s µµ K + /K*/φ 19

B d,s µµ K + /K*/φ B Rare Decays B + µµk + B 0 µµ Κ B s µµφ Λ b µµ Λ observed at Babar, Belle hep-ex/0109026, hep-ex/0308042, hep-ex/0503044 FCNC b sγ* Penguin or box processes in the Standard Model: µ µ µ µ Rare processes: Latest Belle measurement x10-7 20

Motivations 1) Would be first observations in B s and Λ b channels 2) Tests of Standard Model branching ratios kinematic distributions (with enough statistics) Effective field theory for b s (Operator Product Expansion) Rare decay channels are sensitive to Wilson coefficients which are calculable for many models (several new physics scenarios e.g. SUSY, technicolor) Decay amplitude: C 9 Dilepton mass distribution: C 7, C 9 Forward-backward asymmetry: C 10 21

Analysis Outline (CDF,D0) Use B J/ψX channels as control channels exactly the same signature (J/ψ µµ) use MC to obtain relative efficiency B s J/ψ φ Most likely confirm observation B + µµk + and measure BR Then either make first observations in B s and Λ b or set strong branching ratio limits 22

Sensitivity Analysis (D0) Cuts analysis using same variables as B s µµ analysis Remove the dimuon mass regions corresponding to J/ψ, ψ, φ Contribution from rare decays not well understood under resonances 23

Sensitivity Analysis (D0) Box is unopened Expected background: 5.1 ± 1.0 events Sensitivity for 90% C.L. limit calculated: BR(B s µµφ)<1.2 x10-5 24

Summary B d,s µ + µ are a powerful probe of new physics Could give first hint of new physics at the Tevatron World best limits coming from Tevatron experiments Combinations of D0 and CDF results by Lepton Photon 05 SO(10) msugra B d,s µ + µ K/K*/φ should be observable in Run II Also a test of the Standard Model Sensitivity analysis performed, awaiting results 25

Backup 26

Samples (CDF) Dedicated rare B triggers in total six Level 3 paths Two muons + other cuts using all chambers to η 1.1 Use two types of dimuons: CMU-CMU CMU-CMX Additional cuts in some triggers: Σp t (µ)>5 GeV L xy >100µm mass(µ µ)<6 GeV mass(µ µ)>2.7 GeV 27

Background estimate (CDF) LH CMU-CMU CMU-CMX cut pred obsv pred obsv >0.50 236+/-4 235 172+/-3 168 OS- >0.90 37+/-1 32 33+/-1 36 >0.99 2.8+/-0.2 2 3.6+/-0.2 3 >0.50 2.3+/-0.2 0 2.8+/-0.3 3 SS+ >0.90 0.25+/-0.03 0 0.44+/-0.04 0 >0.99 <0.10 0 <0.10 0 >0.50 2.7+/-0.2 1 3.7+/-0.3 4 SS- >0.90 0.35+/-0.03 0 0.63+/-0.06 0 >0.99 <0.10 0 <0.10 0 >0.50 84+/-2 84 21+/-1 19 FM+ >0.90 14.2+/-0.4 10 3.9+/-0.2 3 >0.99 1.0+/-0.1 2 0.41+/-0.03 0 1.) OS- : opposite-charge dimuon, λ < 0 2.) SS+ : same-charge dimuon, λ > 0 3.) SS- : same-charge dimuon, λ < 0 4.) FM : fake muon sample (at least one leg failed muon stub chi2 cut) 28

Likelihood p.d.f.s (CDF) Input p.d.f.s: Likelihood ratio discriminant: 29

Methodology (CDF) Search for muon pairs in B d /B s mass windows D0 search for only Bs and correct for Bd decays Approximately 360pb -1 integrated luminosity Blind analysis Aim to measure BR or set limit BR( B s total + NBs αb + εb + fu + + + µ µ ) = BR( B J / ψk ) BR( J / ψ µ µ ) total N α ε f B+ Bs Bs s Reconstruct normalization mode (B + J/ψ K + ) Construct discriminant to select B signal and suppress dimuon background Measure background Measure the acceptance and efficiency ratios 30

Signal and Side-band Regions Use events from same triggers for B + and Bs(d) µµ reconstruction. Search region: - 5.169 < Mµµ < 5.469 GeV - Signal region not used in optimization procedure σ(μ µµ )~24MeV Monte Carlo Search region Sideband regions: - 500MeV on either side of search region - For background estimate and analysis optimization.

MC Samples Pythia MC Tune A default cdfsim tcl realistic silicon and beamline pt(b) from Mary Bishai pt(b)>3 GeV && y(b) <1.5 Bs µ+µ (signal efficiencies) B+ JK+ µ+µ K+ (nrmlztn efncy and xchks) B+ Jπ+ µ+µ π+ (nrmlztn correction)

SO(10) Unification Model R. Dermisek et al., hep-ph/0304101 tan(β)~50 constrained by unification of Yukawa coupling Ω χ h 2 >0.13 All previously allowed regions (white) are excluded by this new measurement mχ+<104gev mh<111gev Unification valid for small M 1/2 (~500GeV) New Br(Bs µµ) limit strongly disfavors this solution for m A = 500 GeV Red regions are excluded by either theory or experiments Green region is the WMAP preferred region Blue dashed line is the Br(Bs µµ) contour Light blue region excluded by old Bs µµ analysis Excluded by this new result

Method: Likelihood Variable Choice Prob(λ) = probability of Bs µµ yields λ>λ obs (ie. the integral of the cumulative distribution) Prob(λ) = exp(-λ/438 µm) yields flat distribution reduces sensitivity to MC modeling inaccuracies (e.g. L00, SVX-z)

Method: Checking MC Modeling of Signal LH For CMU-CMX: MC reproduces Data efficiency vs LHood cut to 5% or better Assign 5% (relative) systematic for CMU-CMX

Step 4: Compute Acceptance and Efficiencies α α B+ Bs ε ε trig B+ trig Bs ε ε reco µµ B+ reco µµ Bs ε ε Most efficiencies are determined directly from data using inclusive J/ψ µµ events. The rest are taken from Pythia MC. α(b+/bs) = 0.297 +/- 0.008 (CMU-CMU) = 0.191 +/- 0.006 (CMU-CMX) vtx B+ vtx Bs ε reco K B+ 1 ε LH Bs ε LH (Bs): ranges from 70% for LH>0.9 to 40% for LH>0.99 ε trig (B+/Bs) = 0.9997 +/- 0.0016 (CMU-CMU) = 0.9986 +/- 0.0014 (CMU-CMX) ε reco-µµ (B+/Bs) = 1.00 +/- 0.03 (CMU-CMU/X) ε vtx (B+/Bs) = 0.986 +/- 0.013 (CMU-CMU/X) Red = From MC Green = From Data Blue = combination of MC and Data ε reco-k (B+) = 0.938 +/- 0.016 (CMU-CMU/X)