Generalized left and right Weyl spectra of upper triangular operator matrices

Similar documents
The Residual Spectrum and the Continuous Spectrum of Upper Triangular Operator Matrices

On EP elements, normal elements and partial isometries in rings with involution

Multiplicative Perturbation Bounds of the Group Inverse and Oblique Projection

Perturbation of the generalized Drazin inverse

Some results on the reverse order law in rings with involution

On the distance signless Laplacian spectral radius of graphs and digraphs

The symmetric minimal rank solution of the matrix equation AX=B and the optimal approximation

The characterizations and representations for the generalized inverses with prescribed idempotents in Banach algebras

Additivity of maps on generalized matrix algebras

Dragan S. Djordjević. 1. Motivation

Pairs of matrices, one of which commutes with their commutator

of a Two-Operator Product 1

Products of commuting nilpotent operators

STRUCTURAL AND SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF k-quasi- -PARANORMAL OPERATORS. Fei Zuo and Hongliang Zuo

On the simplest expression of the perturbed Moore Penrose metric generalized inverse

Singular Value Inequalities for Real and Imaginary Parts of Matrices

The least eigenvalue of the signless Laplacian of non-bipartite unicyclic graphs with k pendant vertices

Explicit formulas for computing Bernoulli numbers of the second kind and Stirling numbers of the first kind

THE BOUNDEDNESS BELOW OF 2 2 UPPER TRIANGULAR OPERATOR MATRICES. In Sung Hwang and Woo Young Lee 1

Operators with Compatible Ranges

On the Feichtinger conjecture

On the spectral radii of quasi-tree graphs and quasiunicyclic graphs with k pendent vertices

Bicyclic digraphs with extremal skew energy

Partial isometries and EP elements in rings with involution

The spectrum of the edge corona of two graphs

Matrix functions that preserve the strong Perron- Frobenius property

Singular Value and Norm Inequalities Associated with 2 x 2 Positive Semidefinite Block Matrices

dominant positive-normal. In view of (1), it is very natural to study the properties of positivenormal

WEYL S THEOREM FOR PAIRS OF COMMUTING HYPONORMAL OPERATORS

Drazin Invertibility of Product and Difference of Idempotents in a Ring

Group inverse for the block matrix with two identical subblocks over skew fields

Re-nnd solutions of the matrix equation AXB = C

A NOTE ON QUASI ISOMETRIES II. S.M. Patel Sardar Patel University, India

On Sum and Restriction of Hypo-EP Operators

Nonsingularity and group invertibility of linear combinations of two k-potent matrices

Expressions and Perturbations for the Moore Penrose Inverse of Bounded Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces

Representation for the generalized Drazin inverse of block matrices in Banach algebras

Lower bounds for the Estrada index

Factorizations of linear relations

PRODUCT OF OPERATORS AND NUMERICAL RANGE

ON GENERALIZED RIESZ POINTS. Robin Harte, Woo Young Lee and Lance L. Littlejohn

On Fixed Point Results for Matkowski Type of Mappings in G-Metric Spaces

A factorization of the inverse of the shifted companion matrix

ON k QUASI CLASS Q OPERATORS (COMMUNICATED BY T. YAMAZAKI)

A new upper bound for the eigenvalues of the continuous algebraic Riccati equation

Weyl-Type Theorems for Unbounded Operators

Maxima of the signless Laplacian spectral radius for planar graphs

Additive results for the generalized Drazin inverse in a Banach algebra

On the M-matrix inverse problem for singular and symmetric Jacobi matrices

ELA ON THE GROUP INVERSE OF LINEAR COMBINATIONS OF TWO GROUP INVERTIBLE MATRICES

On the reduction of matrix polynomials to Hessenberg form

The Normalized Laplacian Estrada Index of a Graph

Potentially nilpotent tridiagonal sign patterns of order 4

COMPOSITION OPERATORS ON HARDY-SOBOLEV SPACES

Infinite products and paracontracting matrices

ON OPERATORS WITH AN ABSOLUTE VALUE CONDITION. In Ho Jeon and B. P. Duggal. 1. Introduction

On (T,f )-connections of matrices and generalized inverses of linear operators

Complete Moment Convergence for Sung s Type Weighted Sums of ρ -Mixing Random Variables

RETRACTED On construction of a complex finite Jacobi matrix from two spectra

The Jordan forms of AB and BA

Positive definite preserving linear transformations on symmetric matrix spaces

C -Algebra B H (I) Consisting of Bessel Sequences in a Hilbert Space

Moore-Penrose-invertible normal and Hermitian elements in rings

Note on the Jordan form of an irreducible eventually nonnegative matrix

ON THE WIENER INDEX AND LAPLACIAN COEFFICIENTS OF GRAPHS WITH GIVEN DIAMETER OR RADIUS

Operators with Closed Range, Pseudo-Inverses, and Perturbation of Frames for a Subspace

Formulae for the generalized Drazin inverse of a block matrix in terms of Banachiewicz Schur forms

Generalized Schur complements of matrices and compound matrices

On The Fine Spectrum of Generalized Upper Triangular Triple-Band Matrices ( 2 uvw) t

Dihedral groups of automorphisms of compact Riemann surfaces of genus two

On polynomially -paranormal operators

The Drazin inverses of products and differences of orthogonal projections

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 27 Jul 2013

On cardinality of Pareto spectra

W P ZI rings and strong regularity

PAijpam.eu CLASS OF (A, n)-power QUASI-NORMAL OPERATORS IN SEMI-HILBERTIAN SPACES

Weakly Semicommutative Rings and Strongly Regular Rings

Cyclic Refinements of the Different Versions of Operator Jensen's Inequality

A Generalization of Bernoulli's Inequality

A new parallel polynomial division by a separable polynomial via hermite interpolation with applications, pp

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 28 Jan 2016

The symmetric linear matrix equation

The Polynomial Numerical Index of L p (µ)

Generalized B-Fredholm Banach algebra elements

AND COMPACT PERTURBATIONS

INVARIANT PROBABILITIES ON PROJECTIVE SPACES. 1. Introduction

On Closed Range Operators in Hilbert Space

Minimum rank of a graph over an arbitrary field

Some spectral inequalities for triangle-free regular graphs

Means of unitaries, conjugations, and the Friedrichs operator

New Extensions of Cline s Formula for Generalized Inverses

Refined Inertia of Matrix Patterns

NIL DERIVATIONS AND CHAIN CONDITIONS IN PRIME RINGS

1 Introduction and preliminaries

Banach Algebras of Matrix Transformations Between Spaces of Strongly Bounded and Summable Sequences

Spectral properties of m-isometric operators

Sparse spectrally arbitrary patterns

RITZ VALUE BOUNDS THAT EXPLOIT QUASI-SPARSITY

j jf, S K cf = j K c j jf, f H.

Quasinormalty and subscalarity of class p-wa(s, t) operators

Transcription:

Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra Volume 32 Volume 32 (2017 Article 3 2017 Generalized left and right Weyl spectra of upper triangular operator matrices Guojun ai 3695946@163.com Dragana S. Cvetkovic-Ilic University of Nis, gagamaka@ptt.rs Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Algebra Commons Recommended Citation ai, Guojun and Cvetkovic-Ilic, Dragana S.. (2017, "Generalized left and right Weyl spectra of upper triangular operator matrices", Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra, Volume 32, pp. 41-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13001/1081-3810.3373 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Wyoming Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra by an authorized editor of Wyoming Scholars Repository. For more information, please contact scholcom@uwyo.edu.

GENERALIZED LEFT AND RIGT WEYL SPECTRA OF UPPER TRIANGULAR OPERATOR MATRICES GUOJUN AI AND DRAGANA S. CVETOVIĆ-ILIĆ ( A C Abstract. In this paper, for given operators A B( and B B(, the sets of all C B(, such that M C = 0 B is generalized Weyl and generalized left (right Weyl, are completely described. Furthermore, the following intersections and unions of the generalized left Weyl spectra σ g lw (M C and σ g lw (M C C B(, C B(, are also described, and necessary and sufficient conditions which two operators A B( and B B( have to satisfy in order for M C to be a generalized left Weyl operator for each C B(,, are presented. ey words. Operator matrix, Generalized left(right Weyl, Spectrum. AMS subject classifications. 47A10, 47A53, 47A55. 1. Introduction. Let, be infinite dimensional complex separable ilbert spaces, and let B(, denote the set of all bounded linear operators from to. For simplicity, we also write B(, as B(. By F (, we denote the set of all operators from B(, with a finite dimensional range. For a given A B(,, the symbols N (A and R (A denote the null space and the range of A, respectively. Let n(a = dimn (A, β(a = codimr (A, and d(a = dimr (A. If A B(, is such that R (A is closed and n(a <, then A is said to be a upper semi-fredholm operator. If β(a <, then A is called a lower semi-fredholm operator. A semi-fredholm operator is one which is either upper semi-fredholm or lower semi-fredholm. An operator A B(, is called Fredholm if it is both lower semi-fredholm and upper semi-fredholm. The subset of B(, consisting of all Fredholm operators is denoted by Φ(,. By Φ + (, (Φ (, we denote the set of all upper (lower semi-fredholm operators from B(,. If A B(, is such that R (A is closed and n(a d(a, then A is a generalized left Weyl operator. If A B(, is such that R (A is closed and d(a n(a, then A is a generalized right Weyl operator. Notice that in the cases of generalized left (right Weyl operators, n(a and d(a are allowed to be infinity. An operator A B(, is a generalized Weyl operator if it is both generalized right Weyl and generalized left Weyl. The set of all generalized Weyl operators from B(, is denoted by W g (,. Let W gl (, (W gr (, denote the subset of B(, consisting of all generalized left (right Weyl operators. For an operator C B(, the generalized left (right Weyl spectrum σ g lw (C (σg rw(c is defined by σ g lw (C(σg rw(c = λ C : C λi is not generalized left (right Weyl. Received by the editors on August 10, 2016. Accepted for publication on January 11, 2017. andling Editor: Torsten Ehrhardt. School of Mathematical Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, ohhot 010021, PR China (3695946@163.com. University of Niš, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, 18000 Niš, Serbia (dragana@pmf.ni.ac.rs. Supported by grant no. 174007 of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Development, Republic of Serbia.

Guojun ai and Dragana S. Cvetković-Ilić 42 The generalized Weyl spectrum is defined by σ g w(c = λ C : C λi is not generalized Weyl. In this paper, we address the question for which operators A B( and B B(, there exists an operator C B(, such that an upper-triangular operator matrix ( ( ( A C M C = :, 0 B is generalized left (right Weyl. There are many papers which consider some types of invertibility, regularity and some other properties of an upper-triangular operator matrix M C (see [1] [17] and references therein as well as various types of spectra of M C. This paper is a continuation of the work presented in [10], where the sets C B(, σ g w(m C and C B(, σ g w(m C are described and some necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of C B(, such that M C is generalized Weyl are given, but the set of all such operators C is not described. As a corollary of our main results we obtain a description of all C B(, such that M C is generalized Weyl, and we denote this set by S GW (A,B. The sets C B(, σ g lw (M C and C B(, σ g lw (M C are described for given A B( and B B( as well as the set of all C B(, such that M C is generalized left Weyl which is denoted by S GLW (A,B. In an analogous way, similar results can be provided for C B(, σ g rw(m C and C B(, σ g rw(m C. 2. Results. In this section, by, we denote complex separable ilbert spaces. For given operators A B( and B B(, by M C we denote ( A C M C =, 0 B ( : ( where C B(,. Evidently, for given A B( and B B(, arbitrary C B(, can be represented by ( ( ( C1 C C = 2 N (B R (A : C 3 C 4 N (B R (A. (2.1 First, we will state some auxiliary lemmas which will be used in the proof of the main result. LEMMA 2.1. If A B( and D F (, then R (A + D is closed if and only if R (A is closed. LEMMA 2.2. Let S B(, T B(, and R B(, be given operators. (i If R (S is non-closed and R ( ( S T is closed, then n( ( S T =. ( ( S S (ii If R (S is non-closed and R ( is closed, then d( =. R R Proof. (i Suppose that R (S is non-closed, R ( ( S T is closed and n( ( S T <. Then ( ( ( X S T is a left Fredholm operator which implies that there exists an operator : such that Y ( X Y ( S T = I +, for some compact operator B(. ence, XS = I + 1, for some compact operator 1 B( which implies that S is left Fredholm and so R (S is closed, which is a contradiction.

43 Generalized Left and Right Weyl Spectra of Upper Triangular Operator Matrices (ii The proof follows by taking adjoints in (i. In the following theorem, for given operators A B( and B B(, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of C B(, such that M C is a generalized left Weyl operator, and we completely describe the set of all such C B(,. TEOREM 2.3. Let A B( and B B(. There exists C B(, such that M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if one of the following conditions is satisfied: (i R (A and R (B are closed and n(a + n(b d(a + d(b. In this case, S GLW (A,B = C B(, : C is given by (2.1,C 3 has closed range, n(a + n(c 3 d(c 3 + d(b. (ii R (A is closed, R (B is non-closed and d(a =. In this case, S GLW (A,B = C B(, : R (B + R(C P R (A is closed. (iii R (A is non-closed, R (B is closed and n(b = d(a + d(b =. In this case, S GLW (A,B = C B(, : R (A +R (CP N (B is closed, d(b + codim(r (A +R (CP N (B =. (iv R (A and R (B are non-closed and n(b = d(a =. In this case, S GLW (A,B = C B(, : R (M C is closed. For simplicity, we will divide the statement of this theorem into four propositions and prove each of them separately. PROPOSITION 2.4. Let A B( and B B( be such that R (A and R (B are closed. There exists C B(, such that M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if n(a + n(b d(a + d(b. In this case, S GLW (A,B = C B(, : C is given by (2.1,C 3 has closed range, n(a + n(c 3 d(c 3 + d(b. Proof. If n(a + n(b d(a + d(b, then M 0 is a generalized left Weyl operator. Conversely, suppose that there exists C B(, such that M C is a generalized left Weyl operator and that C is given by (2.1. Then M C has a matrix representation M C = A 1 C 1 C 2 0 C 3 C 4 0 0 B 1 : N (B N (B R (A R (A where A 1 : R (A is right invertible and B 1 : N (B is left invertible. Evidently, there exists invertible U,V B( such that A 1 0 0 R (A UM C V = 0 C 3 0 : N (B R (A. (2.2 0 0 B 1 N (B,

Guojun ai and Dragana S. Cvetković-Ilić 44 ence, UM C V is a generalized left Weyl which implies that n(a 1 + n(c 3 d(c 3 + d(b 1. (2.3 Since, n(a 1 = n(a, n(b = n(c 3 + dimn (C 3, d(b 1 = d(b and d(a = d(c 3 + dimr (C 3, having in mind that dimn (C 3 = dimr (C 3 and (2.3, we get n(a + n(b d(a + d(b. To describe the set of all C B(, such that M C is a generalized left Weyl, notice that for arbitrary C given by (2.1, there exists invertible U,V B( such that UM C V is given by (2.10. ence, M C is a generalized left Weyl if and only if UM C V is a generalized left Weyl which is equivalent with the fact that R (C 3 is closed and that (2.3 holds. PROPOSITION 2.5. Let A B( and B B( be such that R (A is closed and R (B is non-closed. There exists C B(, such that M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if d(a =. In this case, S GLW (A,B = C B(, : R (B +R (C P R (A is closed. Proof. Suppose that d(a =. Then M C0 is a generalized left Weyl operator for C 0 given by ( 0 C 0 = J : R (A R (A, where J : R (A is unitary. Evidently, M C0 is represented by M C0 = A 1 0 0 J 0 B : R (A R (A, where A 1 : R (A is right invertible. Since J is invertible, there exists an invertible operator U B( such that A 1 0 UM C0 = 0 J : R (A R (A. 0 0 Now, it is clear that UM C0 is a generalized left Weyl operator, and so M C0 is a generalized left Weyl operator. Conversely, suppose that there exists C B(, such that M C is generalized left Weyl. Then M C has a matrix representation M C = A 1 C 1 0 C 2 0 B : R (A R (A, (2.4

45 Generalized Left and Right Weyl Spectra of Upper Triangular Operator Matrices where A 1 : R (A is right invertible. Thus, there exists an invertible operator V B( such that A 1 0 M C V = 0 C 2 : R (A R (A. (2.5 0 B Now we will show that d(a = : Indeed, if d(a <, then R ( is finite dimensional. Since R (M CV is closed, we (( have that R is closed, which implies that R (B +R ( B is closed. This, together with dimr (C 2 <, implies that R (B is closed. This is a contradiction. ence, d(a =. In order to describe the set S GLW (A,B, notice that for arbitrary C B(,, M C has a form (2.4 and that there exists an invertible operator V B( such that M C V is given by (2.5. ence, M C is generalized left Weyl if (( and only if C is such that R is closed and that B ( ( n(a 1 + n ( B ( ( d(a 1 + d ( B Notice that by Lemma 2.2, we have that for each C 2 B(,R (A such that R (( d =. Thus, B. (2.6 (( B S GLW (A,B = C B(, : R (B +R (C P R (A is closed. is closed, it follows that PROPOSITION 2.6. Let A B( and B B( be such that R (A is non-closed and R (B is closed. There exists C B(, such that M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if n(b = d(a + d(b =. In this case, S GLW (A,B = C B(, : R (A + R(CP N (B is closed, d(b + codim(r (A +R (CP N (B =. Proof. Suppose that n(b = d(a + d(b =. Then there exists a left invertible operator C 1 : N (B such that R (C 1 = R (A. We will prove that M C is a generalized left Weyl operator for C given by C = ( C 1 0 : N (B N (B. Evidently, M C is represented by ( A C1 0 M C = 0 0 B 1 : N (B N (B, where B 1 : N (B is left invertible and R (M C = (R (A +R (C 1 R (B 1 = R (A R (B. Thus, R (M C is closed and d(m C = d(a + d(b =,

Guojun ai and Dragana S. Cvetković-Ilić 46 i.e., M C is a generalized left Weyl operator. Conversely, suppose that there exists C B(, such that M C is generalized left Weyl. It follows that M C has a matrix representation ( A C1 C M C = 2 : N (B N (B, (2.7 0 0 B 1 where B 1 : N (B is left invertible and there exists an invertible operator U B( such that ( A C1 0 UM C = : N (B N (B. (2.8 0 0 B 1 Since UM C has a closed range, by Lemma 2.1 and the fact that R (A is non-closed, we have that n(b =. Also, applying Lemma 2.2, we get that n( ( A C 1 = which implies that d(umc = d(b+d( ( A C 1 =. Since d( ( A C 1 d(a, it follows that d(a + d(b =. In order to describe the set S GLW (A,B, notice that for arbitrary C B(,, M C has a form (2.7 and that there exists an invertible operator V B( such that UM C is given by (2.8. ence, M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if C is such that R (( A C 1 is closed and that n (( A C 1 + n(b1 d (( A C 1 + d(b1. (2.9 Notice that if R (( A C 1 is closed, then by Lemma 2.2, we have that n (( A C1 =. ence, MC is a generalized left Weyl operator for C B(, if and only if R (( A C 1 is closed and d (( A C1 +d(b1 =. Obviously, d(b 1 = d(b. PROPOSITION 2.7. Let A B( and B B( be such that R (A and R (B are non-closed. There exists C B(, such that M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if n(b = d(a =. In this case, S GLW (A,B = C B(, : R(M C is closed. Proof. Since R (A and R (B are non-closed, by Lemma 2.2, we conclude that if C B(, is such that R (M C is closed, then n(m C = d(m C =. ence, M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if R(M C is closed. Now, the proof directly follows by Theorem 2.6 of [4]. REMAR 1. It is interesting to notice that the condition d(b+codim(r (A+R (CP N (B = from Proposition 2.6, appearing also in item (iii of Theorem 2.3, can be replaced by the condition d(c 3 + d(b =, where C 3 is the block-operator defined by (2.1. So, if A B( and B B( are such that R (A is non-closed and R (B is closed, then M C = A 1 C 1 C 2 0 C 3 C 4 0 0 B 1 : N (B N (B R (A R (A where A 1 : R (A is with a dense range and B 1 : N (B is left invertible. There exists an invertible U B( such that A 1 C 1 0 R (A UM C = 0 C 3 0 : N (B R (A. (2.10 0 0 B 1 N (B,

47 Generalized Left and Right Weyl Spectra of Upper Triangular Operator Matrices ( A1 C Now, it is evident that R (M C is closed if and only if 1 is closed which is equivalent with the fact that 0 C 3 R (A + R(CP N (B is closed. Also, (( A1 C d 1 0 C 3 (( A = n 1 0 C1 C3 = n(c 3 = d(c 3, since A 1 is injective (R (A 1 = R (A. ence, in this case, the set S GLW can also be described by S GLW (A,B = C B(, : C is given by (2.1, R (A + R(CP N (B is closed, d(c 3 + d(b =. As a corollary of the previous theorem, we get the description of the set C B(, σ g lw (M C: COROLLARY 2.8. Let A B( and B B( be given operators. Then C B(, σ g lw (M C = λ C : R (A λi is not closed, n(b λi < λ C : R (B λi is not closed, d(a λi < λ C : R (A λi is not closed, R (B λi is closed, d(a λi + d(b λi < λ C : R (A λi,r (B λi are closed, n(a λi + n(b λi > d(a λi + d(b λi. Using Theorem 2.3, Remark 1 and the fact that A is generalized left Weyl if and only if A is generalized right Weyl, we can give the description of the set S GW (A,B which consists of all C B(, such that M C is generalized Weyl. Notice that necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of C B(, such that M C is generalized Weyl are given in [10]. TEOREM 2.9. Let A B( and B B( be given operators. There exists C B(, such that M C is generalized Weyl if and only if one of the following conditions is satisfied: (i R (A and R (B are closed and n(a + n(b = d(a + d(b. In this case, S GW (A,B = C B(, : C is given by (2.1,C 3 has closed range, n(a + n(c 3 = d(c 3 + d(b. (ii R (A is closed, R (B is non-closed and d(a = n(a + n(b =. In this case, S GW (A,B = C B(, : C is given by (2.1,n(A + n(c 3 =, R (B + R(C P R (A is closed. (iii R (A is non-closed, R (B is closed and n(b = d(a + d(b =. In this case, S GW (A,B = C B(, : C is given by (2.1,d(B + d(c 3 =, R (A +R (CP N (B is closed.

Guojun ai and Dragana S. Cvetković-Ilić 48 (iv R (A and R (B are non-closed and n(b = d(a =. In this case, S GW (A,B = C B(, : R (M C is closed. Proof. Since necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of C B(, such that M C is generalized Weyl are given in [10], we need only prove that the set S GW (A,B is given as claimed in each of the four possible cases appearing above. (i Suppose that R (A and R (B are closed and n(a + n(b = d(a + d(b. Using Theorem 2.3, we have that C B(, is such that M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if C is given by (2.1, where C 3 has closed range and n(a + n(c 3 d(c 3 + d(b. Since we are looking for C B(, such that M C is generalized Weyl, we are asking for which C B(, satisfying the previously mentioned condition, M C is generalized right Weyl i.e (M C is generalized left Weyl. Since, and for C given by (2.1, C is given by ( (M C B C = 0 A C = ( C 4 C 2 C 3 C 1 ( : ( N (A : N (A ( ( R (B R (B, (2.11 applying Theorem 2.3 we get that (M C is a generalized left Weyl operator if and only if R (C3 is closed and n(b + n(c 3 d(c 3 + d(a which is equivalent with R (C 3 being closed and the inequality d(c 3 + d(b n(a + n(c 3. ence, M C is a generalized Weyl operator if and only if C is given by (2.1, where C 3 has closed range and n(a + n(c 3 = d(c 3 + d(b. (ii Suppose that R (A is closed, R (B is non-closed and d(a = n(a + n(b =. Using Theorem 2.3, we have that C B(, is such that M C is generalized left Weyl if and only if R (B + R (C P R (A is closed. By item (iii of Theorem 2.3, using the representations of (M C given above, we get that (M C is a generalized left Weyl operator if and only if R (B +R (C P R (A is closed and d(a + codim(r (B +R (C P N (A =. By Remark 1, we have that the last condition is equivalent with d(c 3 + d(a =, i.e., n(a + n(c 3 =, where C 3 is the block operator in the representation (2.1 of C. ence, M C is a generalized Weyl operator if and only if C is given by (2.1, where R (B + R (C P R (A is closed and n(a + n(c 3 =. Items (iii and (iv can be proved in a similar manner. In the next theorem, we present necessary and sufficient conditions which two operators A B( and B B( have to satisfy in order for M C to be a generalized left Weyl operator for each C B(,. TEOREM 2.10. Let A B( and B B(. Then M C is a generalized left Weyl operator for each C B(, if and only if R (A and R (B are closed and one of the following conditions is satisfied: (1 d(a <, n(b =, d(b =,

49 Generalized Left and Right Weyl Spectra of Upper Triangular Operator Matrices (2 d(a =, n(b <, (3 d(a,n(b <, n(a + n(b d(a + d(b. Proof. Suppose that M C is a generalized left Weyl operator for each C B(,. If at least one of R (A and R (B is not closed, we have that M 0 is not a generalized left Weyl operator since its range is not closed. So, it follows that R (A and R (B are closed subspaces. Notice that for arbitrary C B(,, M C is given by 0 A 1 C 1 C 2 M C = 0 0 C 3 C 4 0 0 0 B 1 : 0 0 0 0 N (A N (A N (B N (B R (A R (A R (B R (B, (2.12 where A 1, B 1 are invertible operators and that there exist invertible U,V B( such that 0 A 1 0 0 N (A R (A UM C V = 0 0 C 3 0 0 0 0 B 1 : N (A N (B R (A R (B. (2.13 0 0 0 0 N (B R (B So, for any C 3 B(N (B,R (A, we have that R (C 3 is closed and n(a + n(c 3 d(b + d(c 3. ence, at least one of d(a and n(b is finite. So, we will consider all possible cases (there are 3 in total when at least one of d(a and n(b is finite. Suppose first that d(a < and n(b =. Since for any C 3 B(N (B, R (A, it follows that n(c 3 =, and since there exists C 3 B(N (B,R (A such that d(c 3 = 0, we conclude that n(m C d(m C, for each C B(, if and only if d(b =. If d(a = and n(b < then for any C 3 B(N (B,R (A, we have that d(c 3 =, so n(m C d(m C is satisfied for any C B(,. If d(a,n(b < then for any C 3 B(N (B,R (A, we have that n(b n(c 3 = d(a d(c 3, so n(m C d(m C if and only if n(a + n(b d(a + d(b. The converse implication can be proved in the same manner. As a corollary of the previous theorem, we also get the description of the set C B(, σ g lw (M C: COROLLARY 2.11. For given operators A B( and B B( we have σ g lw (M C = λ C : R (A λi is not closed C B(, λ C : R (B λi is not closed λ C : d(a λi = n(b λi = λ C : d(a λi,n(b λi <, n(a λi + n(b λi > d(a λi + d(b λi λ C : d(b λi < n(b λi =.

Guojun ai and Dragana S. Cvetković-Ilić 50 REMAR 2. Throughout the paper, we have used the following fact: For given operators A B( and B B( in the each of following three cases: (i R (A and R (B are closed, (ii R (A is closed, R (B is non-closed, (iii R (A is non-closed, R (B is closed, we have that R (M C is closed if and only if the respective condition below is satisfied: (1 R (C 3 is closed, (2 R (B +R (C P R (A is closed, (3 R (A + R(CP N (B is closed. REFERENCES [1] X.. Cao, M.Z. Guo, and B. Meng. Semi-Fredholm spectrum and Weyls theorem for operator matrices. Acta Math. Sin., 22:169 178, 2006. [2] X.. Cao and B. Meng. Essential approximate point spectrum and Weyls theorem for operator matrices. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 304:759 771, 2005. [3] D.S. Cvetković -Ilić. The point, residual and continuous spectrum of an upper triangular operator matrix. Linear Algebra Appl., 459:357 367, 2014. [4] Y.N. Dou, G.C. Du, C.F. Shao, and.. Du. Closedness of ranges of upper-triangular operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 304:759 771, 2005. [5].. Du and J. Pan. Perturbation of spectrums of 2 2 operator matrices. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 121:761 776, 1994. [6] G. ai and A. Chen. The residual spectrum and the continuous spectrum of upper triangular operator matrices. Filomat, 28(1:65 71, 2014. [7] J.. an,.y. Lee, and W.Y. Lee. Invertible completions of 2 2 upper triangular operator matrices. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 128:119 123, 2000. [8] I.S. wang and W.Y. Lee. The boundedness below of 2 2 upper triangular operator matrix. Integral Equations Operator Theory, 39:267 276, 2001. [9] Y.Q. Ji. Quasitriangular + small compact = strongly irreducible. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 351:4657 4673, 1999. [10] G. Li, G. ai, and A. Chen. Generalized Weyl spectrum of upper triangular operator matrices. Mediterr. J. Math, 12:1059 1067, 2015. [11] Y. Li, X.. Sun, and.. Du. Intersections of the left and right essential spectra of 2 2 upper triangular operator matrices. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 36(6:811 819, 2004. [12] Y. Li, X.. Sun, and.. Du. The intersection of left (right spectra of 2 2 upper triangular operator matrices. Linear Algebra Appl., 418:112 121, 2006. [13] Y. Li, X.. Sun, and.. Du. A note on the left essential spectra of operator matrices. Acta Math. Sin., 23(12:2235 2240, 2007. [14] Y. Li and. Du. The intersection of essential approximate point spectra of operator matrices. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 323:1171 1183, 2006. [15]. Takahashi. Invertible completions of operator matrices. Integral Equations Operator Theory, 21:355 361, 1995. [16] C. Tretter. Spectral Theory of Block Operator Matrices and Applications. Imperial College Press, London, 2008. [17] S. Zhang, Z. Wu, and. Zhong. Continuous spectrum, point spectrum and residual spectrum of operator matrices. Linear Algebra Appl., 433:653 661, 2010.