ACCELEROGRAPH RECORDINGS OF THE M USA EARTHQUAKE 16 SEPTEMBER, 1972

Similar documents
Differentiation Applications 1: Related Rates

Phys101 First Major-131 Zero Version Coordinator: Dr. A. A. Naqvi Wednesday, September 25, 2013 Page: 1

SPH3U1 Lesson 06 Kinematics

Physics 2010 Motion with Constant Acceleration Experiment 1

Phys101 Final Code: 1 Term: 132 Wednesday, May 21, 2014 Page: 1

MODULE 1. e x + c. [You can t separate a demominator, but you can divide a single denominator into each numerator term] a + b a(a + b)+1 = a + b

AP Physics Kinematic Wrap Up

Control of Strong Motion by the Upper 30 Meters

1.2.1 Vectors. 1 P age. Examples What is the reference vector angle for a vector that points 50 degrees east of south?

Flipping Physics Lecture Notes: Simple Harmonic Motion Introduction via a Horizontal Mass-Spring System

Aircraft Performance - Drag

Sections 15.1 to 15.12, 16.1 and 16.2 of the textbook (Robbins-Miller) cover the materials required for this topic.

1. Introduction. Lab 4 - Geophysics 424, October 29, One-dimensional Interpretation of Magnetotelluric Data

Flipping Physics Lecture Notes: Simple Harmonic Motion Introduction via a Horizontal Mass-Spring System

Chapter 3 Kinematics in Two Dimensions; Vectors

Chapter 2. Kinematics in One Dimension. Kinematics deals with the concepts that are needed to describe motion.

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS

ATTENUATION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION IN SHALLOW EARTHQUAKES

making triangle (ie same reference angle) ). This is a standard form that will allow us all to have the X= y=

Q x = cos 1 30 = 53.1 South

Interference is when two (or more) sets of waves meet and combine to produce a new pattern.

Analysis of Curved Bridges Crossing Fault Rupture Zones

Three charges, all with a charge of 10 C are situated as shown (each grid line is separated by 1 meter).

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Beneficial effect of soil-structure interaction to structural response derived from two building arrays in New Zealand

1 Course Notes in Introductory Physics Jeffrey Seguritan

Lecture 5: Equilibrium and Oscillations

CLASS XI SET A PHYSICS

13. PO TREATMENT OF DEPT (DISTORTIONLESS ENHANCEMENT POLARIZATION TRANSFER)

Sodium D-line doublet. Lectures 5-6: Magnetic dipole moments. Orbital magnetic dipole moments. Orbital magnetic dipole moments

2. Precipitation Chemistry Data

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 72, No. 6, pp , December 1982

Figure 1a. A planar mechanism.

Study Group Report: Plate-fin Heat Exchangers: AEA Technology

Thermodynamics Partial Outline of Topics

Faculty of Engineering and Department of Physics Engineering Physics 131 Midterm Examination February 27, 2006; 7:00 pm 8:30 pm

CHAPTER 6 WORK AND ENERGY

Ray tracing equations in transversely isotropic media Cosmin Macesanu and Faruq Akbar, Seimax Technologies, Inc.

Determining the Accuracy of Modal Parameter Estimation Methods

Kinetics of Particles. Chapter 3

~'- ~I I \~ APPlIED TECHNOlOGY COUNCll

Building to Transformations on Coordinate Axis Grade 5: Geometry Graph points on the coordinate plane to solve real-world and mathematical problems.

Drought damaged area

Examiner: Dr. Mohamed Elsharnoby Time: 180 min. Attempt all the following questions Solve the following five questions, and assume any missing data

5 th grade Common Core Standards

Chapter 23 Electromagnetic Waves Lecture 14

Earthquake locations using single-station deep borehole recordings: Implications for microseismicity on the San Andreas fault in southern California

POLARISATION VISUAL PHYSICS ONLINE. View video on polarisation of light

o Land and water both are heated by solar radiation, but land

Evaluation of the outdoor thermal environment in redevelopment buildings in front of Osaka Station based on observations

Weathering. Title: Chemical and Mechanical Weathering. Grade Level: Subject/Content: Earth and Space Science

Yeu-Sheng Paul Shiue, Ph.D 薛宇盛 Professor and Chair Mechanical Engineering Department Christian Brothers University 650 East Parkway South Memphis, TN

PHYSICS Unit 3 Trial Examination

39th International Physics Olympiad - Hanoi - Vietnam Theoretical Problem No. 1 /Solution. Solution

Assume that the water in the nozzle is accelerated at a rate such that the frictional effect can be neglected.

Methods for Determination of Mean Speckle Size in Simulated Speckle Pattern

14. Which shows the direction of the centripetal force acting on a mass spun in a vertical circle?

Author(s) OKANO, Kennosuke; HIRANO, Isamu.

14. Which shows the direction of the centripetal force acting on a mass spun in a vertical circle?

LHS Mathematics Department Honors Pre-Calculus Final Exam 2002 Answers

David HORN and Irit OPHER. School of Physics and Astronomy. Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences

A Simple Set of Test Matrices for Eigenvalue Programs*

ROUNDING ERRORS IN BEAM-TRACKING CALCULATIONS

Equilibrium of Stress

SNOW AND AVALANCHES FORECASTING OVER THE ANDES MOUNTAlNS. Jose A. Vergara* Departamento de Geoflsica, Universidad de Chile

Physics 212. Lecture 12. Today's Concept: Magnetic Force on moving charges. Physics 212 Lecture 12, Slide 1

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL GaGa: a simple and flexible hierarchical model for microarray data analysis

Computational modeling techniques

Introduction: A Generalized approach for computing the trajectories associated with the Newtonian N Body Problem

Nonlinear Soil Response in the Vicinity of the Van Norman Complex Following the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake

Cambridge Assessment International Education Cambridge Ordinary Level. Published

MAJOR 40,000m GOLD EXPLORATION DRILLING PROGRAM COMMENCES

LCAO APPROXIMATIONS OF ORGANIC Pi MO SYSTEMS The allyl system (cation, anion or radical).

Chapter 2 GAUSS LAW Recommended Problems:

STUDIECENTRUM T.N.O. VOOR SCHEEPSBOUW EN NAVIGATIE AFDELING MACHINEBOUW - DROOGBAK la - AMSTERDAM

( ) + θ θ. ω rotation rate. θ g geographic latitude - - θ geocentric latitude - - Reference Earth Model - WGS84 (Copyright 2002, David T.

ES201 - Examination 2 Winter Adams and Richards NAME BOX NUMBER

ANALYSIS OF THE PACOIMA DAM ACCELEROGRAM--SAN FERNANDO, CALIFORNIA, EARTHQUAKE OF 1971 B~ 5/I. D. TRIFUNAC AND D. E. HUDSON

Work, Energy, and Power

EXAM #1 PHYSICAL SCIENCE 103 Spring, 2016

Lab 11 LRC Circuits, Damped Forced Harmonic Motion

General Chemistry II, Unit I: Study Guide (part I)

( ) kt. Solution. From kinetic theory (visualized in Figure 1Q9-1), 1 2 rms = 2. = 1368 m/s

Lecture 13: Electrochemical Equilibria

^YawataR&D Laboratory, Nippon Steel Corporation, Tobata, Kitakyushu, Japan

Bootstrap Method > # Purpose: understand how bootstrap method works > obs=c(11.96, 5.03, 67.40, 16.07, 31.50, 7.73, 11.10, 22.38) > n=length(obs) >

5.4 Measurement Sampling Rates for Daily Maximum and Minimum Temperatures

(s6 ~lj t') >~.'c;. .. ' ' 9adanki ( N, E)',- !2!!!m'!!.y~ation-6fhorizont~~cb' in the ~()wert.~2qq~~hereover --:!"

THE SEPARATION OF ALUNITE IN ALUNITIC KAOLIN BY SELECTIVE FLOCCULATION

Subject description processes

EEO 401 Digital Signal Processing Prof. Mark Fowler

Vortex Dynamics at the Transition to the Normal State in YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7-δ Films

Power Flow in Electromagnetic Waves. The time-dependent power flow density of an electromagnetic wave is given by the instantaneous Poynting vector

Earthquake accelerograms and attenuation of seismic waves at Oolong, New South Wales

Preparation work for A2 Mathematics [2017]

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 2 Jun 1995

Revision: August 19, E Main Suite D Pullman, WA (509) Voice and Fax

Empirical Analysis of Strong Ground Motion from the 1992 Landers, California, Earthquake

Series and Parallel Resonances

Transcription:

115 ACCELEROGRAPH RECORDINGS OF THE M USA EARTHQUAKE 16 SEPTEMBER, 1972 B.Gauir SUMMARY On 16 September, 1972 at 04 15 09.8 UT an earthquake f magnitude ML 5.0 ccurred in sutheast Papua within abut 20 km f a prpsed dam site n the Musa River. The earthquake triggered tw accelergraphs, Musa A and Musa B, ne at the crest and ne at the base f the dam site. The peak grund acceleratins recrded by the accelergraphs were 1.85 m/s^ and 0.39 m/s^ respectively; the peak grund velcities were 87 mm/s and 2.0 mm/s; and the crrespnding mean perids f the grund mtin were abut 0.23 and 0.04 s. The difference in the nature f the accelergrams is attributed t the difference in the gelgical and tpgraphical settings f the accelergraph sites. The upper site has an elevatin f 406 m and cnsists f abut 60 m f weathered sediments verlying fresh ultramafics. The lwer site has an elevatin f 112 m and cnsists f an utcrp f the ultramafic cmplex. 1. INTRODUCTION In June, 1972 the Bureau f Mineral Resurces, Gelgy and Gephysics (BMP), installed 2 accelergraphs (hereafter called "Musa A" and "Musa B"), 600 m apart, ne n weathered sediments n the crest f ne f the abutments and ne n hard ultramafic rck at the base, f a prpsed dam. site n the Musa River in sutheast Papua (Fig. 1). At abut 04 15 10 UT n 16 September, 1972 an earthquake f magnitude ML 5.0 ccurred within 20 km f the dam site and triggered the accelergraphs. Despite the clseness f the accelergraphs, the accelergrams differ in bth acceleratin amplitude and perid (Figs. 2 and 3). The triggerings were significant insfar as this was the first time in Papua New Guinea that tw strng-mtin instruments recrded simultaneusly n nearby hard and sft rck sites. 2. GROUND MOTION AT THE ACCELEROGRAPH SITES Table 1 lists the maximum grund acceleratin and velcities in the vertical, nrth-suth, and east-west directins; and the perids f grund mtin at the times f maximum acceleratin. Fig. 2 shws the three cmpnents f bth accelergrams and Fig. 3 is a digitized representatin f bth grund acceleratin and velcity at the Musa A site. 2 Acceleratins greater than 0.3 m/s ( g where g is the acceleratin wing t gravity) were recrded fr abut 11 secnds by the Musa A accelergraph. Acceleratins greater than abut 0.15 m/s^ were recrded fr a duratin f * Department f Minerals and Energy, Prt Mresby Gephysics Observatry, Papua New Guinea. abut 5.5 secnds at the Musa B site. 3. ACCELEROGRAPH SITES Figure 4 shws bth accelergraph-site prfiles dwn t bedrck and includes seismic shear wave velcity, density and thickness f each layer. This data was acquired frm seismic wrk (Bishp et al, in prep.) and drilling (Macias, 1971) in the vicinity f the accelergraph sites. The bedrck which utcrps at the Musa B site is an ultramafic cmplex (seismic shear wave velcity near surface f abut 2500 m/s and density 2.8 x 10 3 kg/m 3 and is als fund 60 m beneath a deeply weathered sedimentary pile at the Musa A site. The 2.5 sec S-P time n bth accelergrams suggests that the earthquake hypcentre was abut 19 km frm the dam site which is much greater than the distance separating the tw accelergraphs (0.6km). Therefre the prpagatin path t the tp f the ultramafics at bth sites culd be cnsidered t be identical and cnsequently the differences between recrded grund mtin at the tw sites is attributed t near surface features f the sites alne. 4. THEORETICAL MODEL TO ACCOUNT FOR ACCELERATION AMPLIFICATION IN LAYERED SYSTEMS Madera (1970) utlined a theretical methd t predict the fundamental perid f the seismic waves and the amplificatin f seismic acceleratin in sil prfiles abve bedrck. He btained gd agreement between cmputed and measured values. The principle is that resnance f seismic waves is set up in the layered system abve bedrck, which amplifies the incming signal. Because it is a resnance effect, the dminating perid recrded n the accelergram shuld be related t the fundamental perid f the layered mdel. On applicatin f Madera's (1970) methd t the prfile with parameters shwn in Fig. BULLETIN OF THE NEW ZEALAND NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, VOL.9 N0.2. JUNE 1976

116 4. a fundamental perid f abut 0.26 s was cmputed fr the Musa A site. This value cmpares reasnably well with the measured mean Musa A accelergram perid f 0.23 s at the time f peak acceleratin (Table 1). Because the prpagatin paths thrugh the ultramafics are cnsidered t be identical, it is reasnable t assume that the input signal at the tp f the ultramaf ics beneath Musa A is the same as that registered at Musa B. Therefre Madera's (1970) mdel culd be used t estimate the peak acceleratin amplificatin at Musa A directly with respect t Musa B. When this was carried cut an amplificatin rati f 2 was btained. When extreme estimates f layer density and internal damping were substituted, the maximum pssible amplificatin rati attainable was 2.7, which is still significantly less than the measured acceleratin rati f 4.5. Hence Madera T s (1970) mdel des nt fully accunt fr the amplificatin f acceleratin which tk place at the Musa A site. 5. TOPOGRAPHICAL FACTOR Davis & West (1973) have bserved the effects f tpgraphy n grund mtin at statin sites carefully selected s that the nly difference between them was tpgraphy. Their results indicate that the amunt f amplificatin and the perids at which it ccurs vary with the size f the muntain, and are prbably a functin f the relatin between the wavelengths f the incming seismic signal and the dimensins f the muntain. The suggested causative mechanism fr this amplificatin is resnance f the muntain set up by shear waves when the wavelength f these waves are f the same rder as the dimensins f the muntain. Musa A and B sites are lcated respectively near the crest and base f a 400 m high muntain. Assuming a shear wave velcity f 3.5 km/s and using a perid f 0.25 s (crrespnding rughly t the perid at peak acceleratin) a wavelength f abut 900 m is btained, which is abut half the width f the muntain. Using the results btained by Davis & West (1973) fr a muntain f similar size (Mt. Butler, Nevada), it was fund that the average amplificatin rati f grund mtin at the crest relative t the base was abut 2.5. nt yet been analysed but it is anticipated that this amplificatin is again due t the cmbinatin f the weathered sedimentary pile and the tpgraphy at the Ynki site. 7. CONCLUSIONS 1. An earthquake f magnitude ML 5.0 triggered the tw accelergraphs at the Musa River dam site n 16 September, 1972. The maximum acceleratin recrded by the Musa A accelergraph at the crest f the dam was 1.85 m/s 2 at a perid f 0.23 s. An acceleratin in excess f 0.3 m/s 2 was sustained at the site fr abut 11 s. The maximum acceleratin recrded by the Musa B accelergraph at the base f the dam site was 0.39 m/s 2 at a perid f 0.04 s. An acceleratin in excess f 0.3 m/s 2 was sustained fr abut 2 secnds. 2. The 2.5 s S-P time interval n the accelergrams indicates that the separatin between the earthquake hypcentre and the dam site was abut 19 km. 3. It is suggested that the 4.5:1 rati f amplitude f grund acceleratin which ccurred at the Musa A site relative t that f the Musa B site can be explained by the cmbined effect f the lithlgy and tpgraphy. 8. REFERENCES Bishp, I. D., Pllck, E. J. and Pettifer, G. R. (in prep.), "Musa River hydrelectric-scheme seismic survey, P.N.G., 1970", Bur. Miner. Resur. Aust. Rec. (unpubl.). Davis, L. L., and West, L. R. (1973), "Observed effects f tpgraphy n grund mtin", Bull. seism. Sc. Amer. 63, 283-98. Macias, L. F. (1971), "Gelgy f the Musa Grge dam site area. Eastern Papua", Gelgical Survey f Papua New Guinea Nte n Investigatin, 71-008. Madera, G. A. (1970), "Fundamental perid and amplificatin f peak acceleratin in layered systems", Dept. Civ. Eng., Massachusetts Inst, f Tech. Rpt. N. R69-15, Sils Publ. N. 260. Hence the ttal amplificatin rati f the grund mtin at Musa A relative t Musa B when the cmbined effect f lithlgical and tpgraphical factrs are taken int accunt has been theretically estimated at abut 5, which is in reasnable agreement with the measured rati f abut 4.5. 6. YONKI DAMSITE ACCELEROGRAMS On 20 September, 1974 in the eastern highlands f Papua New Guinea, an amplificatin factr f maximum grund acceleratin amplitude f abut 8 was registered between a weathered sedimentary accelergraph site (Ynki) and a hard rck site (Intake) abut 1 km apart. Preliminary maximum recrded acceleratin and perid at the Ynki site were 2.3m sec 2 and 0.17 sees respectively, and at the Intake site were 0.28m sec" 2 and 0.09 sees respectively. Recrds have

117 TAELE 1. SUMMARY OF GROUND MOTION AT MUSA GORGE 16 SEPTEMBER/ 1972 Cmpnent Max. accel. Max. velcity Perid (s) m/s 2 mm/s P wave S wave MUSA A Z 0.28 7 0.11 0.14 NS EW 0.78 1.66 46 74 0.09 0.09 0.22 0.25 Vectr Resultant 1.85 87 Mean 0.23 MUSA B Z NS EW 0.01 0.39 1.3 1.4 0.6 0.04 0.04 0.05 Vectr Resultant 0.39 2.0 Mean 0.04

FIGURE 1: LOCALITY OF MUSA RIVER 00

t Secnds L 0 cm VERTICAL SCALE (apprx) HORIZONTAL COMPONENTS: 1cm = 1.7ms -2 VERTICAL COMPONENTS: lcm* 1.1ms -a. FIGURE 2 : COPIES OF MUSA RIVER ACCELEROGRAMS

ACCELERATION cm/s 2 VELOCITY cm/s ACCELERATION VELOCITY ACCELERATION cm/s 2 VELOCITY cm/s GV C DO c z Q H O z cn DO m«>h *T O m s C m > > m 3D O > x

121 FIGURE 4: THE MUSA PROFILES Depth MUSA A MUSA B (m) ~ ~ Cs = 171 m/s Y = 2.2 x 10 3 kg/m 3 Cs = 285 m/s y = 2.5 x 10 3 kg/m 3 in 6 CD lh " ' <D ^ Cs = 456 m/s t * Y = 2.25 x 10 kg/iri 24 Cs = 1311 m/s 61 Y = 2.35 x 10 3 kg/m 3 Cs = 2565 m/s u Cs = 2280 m/s H Y = 2.8 x 10 3 kg/m 3 y = 2.8 x 10 3 kg/m 3 n 4J Ntatin Cs = seismic shear v/ave velcity Y = density Nte (1) Density values are estimates supplied by Macias (pers. cmm.) wh examined the drill cres. (2) The Musa A accelergraph site is 300 m abve the Musa B site.