The functional organization of the visual cortex in primates

Similar documents
9.01 Introduction to Neuroscience Fall 2007

Jan 16: The Visual System

Higher Processing of Visual Information: Lecture II --- April 4, 2007 by Mu-ming Poo

How Complex Cells Are Made in a Simple Cell Network

Visual Motion Analysis by a Neural Network

Ângelo Cardoso 27 May, Symbolic and Sub-Symbolic Learning Course Instituto Superior Técnico

Sustained and transient channels

Modeling retinal high and low contrast sensitivity lters. T. Lourens. Abstract

Perception of colour, form, depth and movement; organization of associative visual fields. Seminar Prof Maja Valić

Visual System. Anatomy of the Visual System. Advanced article

A Biologically-Inspired Model for Recognition of Overlapped Patterns

Limulus. The Neural Code. Response of Visual Neurons 9/21/2011

A spherical model for orientation and spatial-frequency tuning in a cortical hypercolumn

Spatial Vision: Primary Visual Cortex (Chapter 3, part 1)

Nonlinear reverse-correlation with synthesized naturalistic noise

CLINICAL VISUAL OPTICS (OPTO 223) Weeks XII & XIII Dr Salwa Alsaleh

Deep learning in the visual cortex

Visual motion processing and perceptual decision making

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Tilt-aftereffect and adaptation of V1 neurons

Statistics and geometry of orientation selectivity in primary visual cortex

Adaptation to a 'spatial-frequency doubled' stimulus

Elements of Neurogeometry

Exercises. Chapter 1. of τ approx that produces the most accurate estimate for this firing pattern.

BASIC VISUAL SCIENCE CORE

Fundamentals of Computational Neuroscience 2e

Brain-Like Approximate Reasoning

Spatial-frequency organization in primate striate cortex

Adaptation in the Neural Code of the Retina

Motion Perception 1. PSY305 Lecture 12 JV Stone

Neural Encoding II: Reverse Correlation and Visual Receptive Fields

Sub-Riemannian geometry in models of the visual cortex

Neural Networks. Henrik I. Christensen. Computer Science and Engineering University of California, San Diego

Charles Cadieu, Minjoon Kouh, Anitha Pasupathy, Charles E. Connor, Maximilian Riesenhuber and Tomaso Poggio

Neuroinformatics. Marcus Kaiser. Week 10: Cortical maps and competitive population coding (textbook chapter 7)!

Simple Cell Receptive Fields in V1.

Natural Image Statistics

Dynamic Shape Synthesis in Posterior Inferotemporal Cortex

Lateral organization & computation

!) + log(t) # n i. The last two terms on the right hand side (RHS) are clearly independent of θ and can be

High-dimensional geometry of cortical population activity. Marius Pachitariu University College London

Realistic Modeling of Simple and Complex Cell Tuning in the HMAX Model, and Implications for Invariant Object Recognition in Cortex

b). (Enroth-Cugell & Robson, 1966; Cleland, Dubin & Levick, 1971; Lennie, 1980a

Functional Anatomy of Macaque Striate Cortex. III. Color

Krubitzer & Kaas S1 S2

Modeling and Characterization of Neural Gain Control. Odelia Schwartz. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment

Tuning tuning curves. So far: Receptive fields Representation of stimuli Population vectors. Today: Contrast enhancment, cortical processing

Extraclassical Receptive Field Phenomena and Short-Range Connectivity in V1

Information maximization in a network of linear neurons

A Three-dimensional Physiologically Realistic Model of the Retina

A General Mechanism for Tuning: Gain Control Circuits and Synapses Underlie Tuning of Cortical Neurons

Structured hierarchical models for neurons in the early visual system

V2 Thin Stripes Contain Spatially Organized Representations of Achromatic Luminance Change

Effects of Betaxolol on Hodgkin-Huxley Model of Tiger Salamander Retinal Ganglion Cell

Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells

Viewpoint invariant face recognition using independent component analysis and attractor networks

Σ S(x )δ x. x. Σ S(x )δ x ) x Σ F(S(x )δ x ), by superposition x Σ S(x )F(δ x ), by homogeneity x Σ S(x )I x. x. Σ S(x ) I x (y ) = x

Slow Feature Analysis on Retinal Waves Leads to V1 Complex Cells

A Neurocomputational Model of Smooth Pursuit Control to Interact with the Real World

Neurogeometry of vision. Lecture IV. Primary visual corte

Auto-correlation of retinal ganglion cell mosaics shows hexagonal structure

Topographic organization of areas V3 and V4 and its relation to supra-areal organization of the primate visual system

Structure and function of parallel pathways in the primate early visual system

Spatial Representations in the Parietal Cortex May Use Basis Functions

Lecture 6: Non-Cortical Visual Pathways MCP 9.013/7.68, 03

Mid Year Project Report: Statistical models of visual neurons

Spatial pattern summation is phase-insensitive in the fovea but not in the periphery

SPIKE TRIGGERED APPROACHES. Odelia Schwartz Computational Neuroscience Course 2017

Information Processing in Neural Populations

Is the Human Visual System Invariant to Translation and Scale?

+ + ( + ) = Linear recurrent networks. Simpler, much more amenable to analytic treatment E.g. by choosing

Bayesian Computation in Recurrent Neural Circuits

Contextual modulation of V1 receptive fields depends on their spatial symmetry

A Model of Local Adaptation supplementary information

LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis

Clicker Question. Discussion Question

Morphology of physiologically identified neurons in the visual cortex of the cat

Introduction Principles of Signaling and Organization p. 3 Signaling in Simple Neuronal Circuits p. 4 Organization of the Retina p.

For more information about how to cite these materials visit

Neural Encoding I: Firing Rates and Spike Statistics

Normative Theory of Visual Receptive Fields

Convolutional neural networks

encoding and estimation bottleneck and limits to visual fidelity

Decoding conceptual representations

EXTENSIONS OF ICA AS MODELS OF NATURAL IMAGES AND VISUAL PROCESSING. Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer and Jarmo Hurri

Hierarchy. Will Penny. 24th March Hierarchy. Will Penny. Linear Models. Convergence. Nonlinear Models. References

Modeling Surround Suppression in V1 Neurons with a Statistically-Derived Normalization Model

LGN Input to Simple Cells and Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning: An Analysis

Modelling stochastic neural learning

SOME RELATIONS BETWEEN VISUAL PERCEPTION AND NON- LINEAR PHOTONIC STRUCTURES

This cannot be estimated directly... s 1. s 2. P(spike, stim) P(stim) P(spike stim) =

The role of ephrins and structured retinal activity in the development of visual map topography

arxiv: v2 [cs.cv] 29 Aug 2016

The Temporal Dynamics of Cortical Normalization Models of Decision-making

Contact Geometry of the Visual Cortex

Received 22 September 2006 Accepted 9 February 2007

Recipes for the Linear Analysis of EEG and applications

Adaptive Velocity Tuning for Visual Motion Estimation

The Hebb rule Neurons that fire together wire together.

Transcription:

The functional organization of the visual cortex in primates Dominated by LGN M-cell input Drosal stream for motion perception & spatial localization V5 LIP/7a V2 V4 IT Ventral stream for object recognition & discrimination Dominated by LGN P- & K-cell input

Understanding how visual information is processed in the brain Three stages of neural processing 1. Low-level processing: First-order stimulus feature information (stimulus contrast, orientation, spatial frequency, temporal frequency, wavelength) is processed. 2. Mid-level processing: Grouping or linking of first-order stimulus information. 3. High-level processing: Decision-making mechanisms: Initiation of perceptual responses, e.g., recognition of an object in visual scenes.

1. Topographic organization of V1 2. Cell classification--simple vs. complex, & hypercomplex? 3. Orientation tuning-feed forward vs. long-range signals 4. Direction selectivity 5. Spatial / temporal frequency tuning 6. Ocular dominance 7. Functional organization (1) Ocular dominance columns 8. Functional organization (2) Orientation columns

Stimulus flashed ON Orientation Selectivity Spike trains for different stimulus orientations. Orientation tuning is one of the biggest differences between LGN & cortex. Orientation selectivity is an emergent (i.e., not present in the LGN) & invariant property (i.e. it is not qualitatively altered by other stimulus manipulations). For example, a cell will typically exhibit the same preferred orientation for a bright vs. a dark bar. From Hubel & Wiesel, 1962

Orientation Selectivity Examples of orientation tuning functions for three representative neurons. Orientation tuning is shown by the great majority of cortical cells and by all functional classes of cortical neurons. The preferred orientation and sharpness of orientation tuning are unaffected by stimulus contrast, when gratings were used as stimuli.

Orientation/Direction Selectivity Polar plots of orientation tuning for 4 representative neurons. The angle represents the stimulus orientation & the radial dimension is the response in spikes/sec. Drifting gratings From DeValois, 1982

Mechanisms of orientation selectivity Simple Cell LGN RFs Simple cells produced by converging inputs from a row of LGN that have the same RF polarity.

Simple Cell Model ON LGN centers make up the ON subregions in simple RFs. The OFF subregions reflect the centers of OFF center LGN cells (the LGN surround are not very obvious at cortex). The degree of orientation tuning will vary with the number of LGN inputs and the orderliness of their spatial retinotopy. From Wandel, 1995

Long-range & local connections affects orientation selectivity Local Orientation columns Long-range Bosking et al, 1997 From Senpigel & Blakemore, 1966

1. Topographic organization of V1 2. Cell classification--simple vs. complex, & hypercomplex? 3. Orientation tuning-feed forward vs. long-range signals 4. Direction selectivity 5. Spatial frequency tuning 6. Ocular dominance 7. Functional organization (1) Ocular dominance columns 8. Functional organization (2) Orientation columns

Direction Selectivity Spike trains for different stimulus orientations and different directions of movement. This cell is selective for both stimulus orientation and the direction of movement. From Hubel & Wiesel, 1962

Direction Selectivity Distribution of directional selectivity for a population of cortical cells. The direction ratio = the response in the non-preferred direction / response in the preferred direction. The bimodal nature of the distribution suggests that direction selective cells for a distinct subgroup. RF Preferred Non-Preferred 100 spikes/sec 10 spikes/ sec From DeValois

Linear summation model Bright bar

Directional Selectivity: Simple Cell Evidence for nonlinear contributions to directional selectivity Bicuculine blocks GABA mediated inhibition & as shown here eliminates directional selectivity in some cells. From Sillito, 1977

1. Topographic organization of V1 2. Cell classification--simple vs. complex, & hypercomplex? 3. Orientation tuning-feed forward vs. long-range signals 4. Direction selectivity 5. Spatial / temporal frequency tuning 6. Ocular dominance 7. Functional organization (1) Ocular dominance columns 8. Functional organization (2) Orientation columns

Spatial Frequency M M Magno vs. Parvo P P Response P Contrast Sensitivity Response (spikes/sec) M P M Contrast (%)

Spatial Frequency Tuning Examples of SF tuning functions for 6 cells recorded in a single penetration. The RFs were superimposed. Note the that at a given eccentricity the peak SF cover a wide range of SFs. Contrast sensitivity 1 10 Spatial Frequency (c/d) CSF is determined by the sensitivity of multiple spatial channels (V1neurons?) Contrast sensitivity 1 10 Spatial Frequency (c/d) Human Vision Cortical Neurons

Contrast Sensitivity Contrast Sensitivity Temporal Frequency Tuning P cells M cells Temporal frequency (Hz) Temporal frequency (Hz) Visual Latency: Integration time 55 msec 50 msec Movshon et al, 2005

1. Topographic organization of V1 2. Cell classification--simple vs. complex, & hypercomplex? 3. Orientation tuning-feed forward vs. long-range signals 4. Direction selectivity 5. Spatial/Temporal frequency tuning 6. Ocular dominance 7. Functional organization (1) Ocular dominance columns 8. Functional organization (2) Orientation columns

1. Topographic organization of V1 2. Cell classification--simple vs. complex, & hypercomplex? 3. Orientation tuning-feed forward vs. long-range signals 4. Direction selectivity 5. Spatial frequency tuning 6. Ocular dominance 7. Functional organization (1) Ocular dominance columns 8. Functional organization (2) Orientation columns

Ocular dominance columns in V1 R Long-range horizontal connections LGN I L Inject radioactive proline LGN VI V IVc II - III & IVAB Higher Order Visual Areas (Extrastriate visual areas)

Ocular Dominance Columns cross section white matter tangential section through layer IV layer IV From Hubel et al., 1978 Dark-field autoradiographs. Radioactive proline injected into one eye. The light areas represent parts of cortex that received inputs from the injected eye.

Response (spikes/sec) L Ocular Dominance Ocular dominance = relative ability of the 2 eyes to excite a cortical neuron. R Right V1 LGN Monkey V1 0.4 N = 238 0.3 0.2 0.1 Proportion of Units(%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Contralateral Ipsilateral Ocular Dominance II-III IVC V-VI L R L R L

1. Topographic organization of V1 2. Cell classification--simple vs. complex, & hypercomplex? 3. Orientation tuning-feed forward vs. long-range signals 4. Direction selectivity 5. Spatial/Temporal frequency tuning 6. Ocular dominance 7. Functional organization (1) Ocular dominance columns 8. Functional organization (2) Orientation columns

Orientation Columns from Hubel et al., 1978 Preferred orientations for cells in 3 penetrations. Note that the preferred orientations are similar through the full thickness of cortex -- i.e. orientation columns extent from layer 1 to layer 6.

Orientation Columns layer IV orientation columns Deoxyglucose autoradiograpy of horizontal section through operculum. Staining pattern was produced by vertical moving strips presented to both eyes. The dark areas represent activated neurons. from Hubel et al., 1978

Orientation Columns Color coded map of the preferred orientations across the brain s surface obtained using a method to optically image brain activity. Pinwheel = area of converge of different orientation columns ( singularity ). From Blasdel, 1992

Relationship between CO Blobs, Orientation Columns & Ocular Dominance Columns Overlay of orientation & ocular dominance columns. The expected positions of CO blobs have been drawn. From Blasdel, 1992

Hypercolumn CO Blobs Hubel and Wiesel, 1982

Neural Basis of Visual Perception Neural Detectors & Network Dorsal Stream of the Extrastriate Visual Areas Primary Visual Cortex (Area 17, V1, Striate Cortex) Ventral Stream of the Extrastriate Visual Areas Network of Neurons Neurons Retina LGN Visual Cortex

Three stages of cortical processing 1. Low-level: First-order stimulus feature information (orientation, SF, TF) is processed: V1 2. Mid-level: Grouping or linking of first-order stimulus information: Low to mid-level extrastriate visual areas (V2, V3, V4, MT, & MST). 3. High-level: Initiation of perceptual responses, e.g., recognition of an object in visual scenes: Higher-centers (IT, LIP, beyond).

Ability to integrate local information over a large area RF of V1 neurons are too small to see the circle. V4 neurons can integrate (link) preferred orientations of Gabor patches (Curvature detectors). IT neurons can decode information from V4 -----> Seeing a circle (shape). 7 deg 1.6 deg

The size of RF increases with retinal eccentricities and cortical areas in the streams /V4 /V3 (V5) Bullier et al, 2003

Hierarchical Organization The large number of interconnections probably are important for coordinating processing between parallel streams and dynamic regulation of information flow. from Van Essen et al., 1992

Functional Streams Visual system separates different types of information in to parallel, anatomically segregated processing streams. Generally primate and human brains are considered to have 2 dominant streams 1) the occipitotemporal pathway, the ventral stream, which is thought to be crucial for object identification (the what pathway) & 2) the occipitoparietal pathway, the dorsal stream, which is thought to be crucial for spatial relationships & visual guidance of movements (the where pathway).

Major input to Where stream is dominated by M-signals, whereas What stream is dominated by P- and K-signals Kaplan, 2003 V5 Where What Extrastriate visual areas V5 V2 V4

Early evidence for two functional streams from a PET study Dorsal (Parietal) Ventral (Temporal) Haxby et al, 1994 Face & location matching > Control Face Matching > Control Location Matching > Control

Inferior Temporal lobe ( several TE areas) was named as object or image identification areas because IT cells respond well to visual images of natural object (e.g., faces, hands etc.) Temporal lobe

Inferior Temporal (TE) neurons respond well to simplified but critical features of object image Temporal lobe

Inferior temporal neurons are specifically activated by faces. Convergence and integration of key feature information is necessary for identification of a face. From Tanifuji, 2003

Functional MRI activation in human brain Moving stimuli Stationary stimuli V1 (The primary visual cortex) MT/V5 (Extrastriate Area)

Human Functional MRI illustrating Motion Sensitive Areas Tootell et al, 1997 Vandufell et al, 2003 Orban et al, 2003

The functional organization of the visual cortex in primates Dominated by LGN M-cell input Drosal stream for motion perception & spatial localization V5 LIP/7a V2 V4 IT Ventral stream for object recognition & discrimination Dominated by LGN P- & K-cell input

Information processing by neurons of our visual brain 1. Encoding of stimulus contrast and spatial-temporal frequency information (RGC & LGN) 2. Detection and encoding of orientation and spatial frequency of lines and contours (V1) 3. Encoding of angles or curvatures (V2, V4) 4. Encoding the spatial relationships of orientated lines, textures or contours (Linking)(V2, V4) 5. Decoding of linked features Perception of face )(IT, beyond) V5 LIP/7a V2 V4 IT