EE105 Fall 2015 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Frequency Response. Prof. Ming C. Wu 511 Sutardja Dai Hall (SDH)

Similar documents
Frequency Response Prof. Ali M. Niknejad Prof. Rikky Muller

Chapter 9 Frequency Response. PART C: High Frequency Response

EE105 Fall 2014 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

CE/CS Amplifier Response at High Frequencies

Lecture 37: Frequency response. Context

Assignment 3 ELEC 312/Winter 12 R.Raut, Ph.D.

I. Frequency Response of Voltage Amplifiers

Lecture 23 Frequency Response of Amplifiers (I) Common Source Amplifier. December 1, 2005

ECE 546 Lecture 11 MOS Amplifiers

The Miller Approximation

ECE-343 Test 1: Feb 10, :00-8:00pm, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

ECE-343 Test 2: Mar 21, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

ECE 255, Frequency Response

Homework Assignment 08

EE105 Fall 2014 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits. NMOS Transistor Capacitances: Saturation Region

Electronic Circuits Summary

ECEN 326 Electronic Circuits

ECE-342 Test 3: Nov 30, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : Solution

Chapter 13 Small-Signal Modeling and Linear Amplification

Lecture 23 - Frequency Resp onse of Amplifiers (I) Common-Source Amplifier. May 6, 2003

6.012 Electronic Devices and Circuits Spring 2005

Lecture 15: MOS Transistor models: Body effects, SPICE models. Context. In the last lecture, we discussed the modes of operation of a MOS FET:

EE 330. Lecture 35. Parasitic Capacitances in MOS Devices

Exact Analysis of a Common-Source MOSFET Amplifier

Multistage Amplifier Frequency Response

Homework Assignment 09

ESE319 Introduction to Microelectronics Bode Plot Review High Frequency BJT Model

Common Drain Stage (Source Follower) Claudio Talarico, Gonzaga University

University of Toronto. Final Exam

Refinements to Incremental Transistor Model

Final Exam. 55:041 Electronic Circuits. The University of Iowa. Fall 2013.

SOME USEFUL NETWORK THEOREMS

Voltage AmpliÞer Frequency Response

Lecture Stage Frequency Response - I (1/10/02) Page ECE Analog Integrated Circuits and Systems II P.E.

3. Basic building blocks. Analog Design for CMOS VLSI Systems Franco Maloberti

CHAPTER.6 :TRANSISTOR FREQUENCY RESPONSE

Advanced Current Mirrors and Opamps

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design Fall 2011

Whereas the diode was a 1-junction device, the transistor contains two junctions. This leads to two possibilities:

Electronic Devices and Circuits Lecture 18 - Single Transistor Amplifier Stages - Outline Announcements. Notes on Single Transistor Amplifiers

EE 40: Introduction to Microelectronic Circuits Spring 2008: Midterm 2

Chapter 6: Field-Effect Transistors

55:041 Electronic Circuits The University of Iowa Fall Exam 2

Electronics II. Final Examination

Lecture 24 Multistage Amplifiers (I) MULTISTAGE AMPLIFIER

55:041 Electronic Circuits The University of Iowa Fall Final Exam

Homework 6 Solutions and Rubric

(Refer Slide Time: 1:49)

CARLETON UNIVERSITY. FINAL EXAMINATION December DURATION 3 HOURS No. of Students 130

Digital Microelectronic Circuits ( )

Lecture 5 Review Current Source Active Load Modified Large / Small Signal Models Channel Length Modulation

MOS Transistor Theory

EECS 105: FALL 06 FINAL

Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET)

Engineering 1620 Spring 2011 Answers to Homework # 4 Biasing and Small Signal Properties

Lecture 10 MOSFET (III) MOSFET Equivalent Circuit Models

Sophomore Physics Laboratory (PH005/105)

Homework Assignment 11

Chapter 4 Field-Effect Transistors

Biasing the CE Amplifier

Two-Port Networks Admittance Parameters CHAPTER16 THE LEARNING GOALS FOR THIS CHAPTER ARE THAT STUDENTS SHOULD BE ABLE TO:

Lecture 04: Single Transistor Ampliers

D is the voltage difference = (V + - V - ).

ECE137B Final Exam. Wednesday 6/8/2016, 7:30-10:30PM.

Lecture 10 MOSFET (III) MOSFET Equivalent Circuit Models

E2.2 Analogue Electronics

Notes for course EE1.1 Circuit Analysis TOPIC 10 2-PORT CIRCUITS

Lecture 210 Physical Aspects of ICs (12/15/01) Page 210-1

Lecture 18. Common Source Stage

ID # NAME. EE-255 EXAM 3 April 7, Instructor (circle one) Ogborn Lundstrom

1. (50 points, BJT curves & equivalent) For the 2N3904 =(npn) and the 2N3906 =(pnp)

6.301 Solid-State Circuits Recitation 14: Op-Amps and Assorted Other Topics Prof. Joel L. Dawson

ESE319 Introduction to Microelectronics. Feedback Basics

ECE3050 Assignment 7

IFB270 Advanced Electronic Circuits

Circuit Topologies & Analysis Techniques in HF ICs

6.301 Solid State Circuits Recitation 7: Emitter Degeneration, and More on Multistage Amps Prof. Joel L. Dawson

Sample-and-Holds David Johns and Ken Martin University of Toronto

EE 240B Spring Advanced Analog Integrated Circuits Lecture 2: MOS Transistor Models. Elad Alon Dept. of EECS

Capacitors Diodes Transistors. PC200 Lectures. Terry Sturtevant. Wilfrid Laurier University. June 4, 2009

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design

6.776 High Speed Communication Circuits Lecture 10 Noise Modeling in Amplifiers

Sinusoidal Steady State Analysis (AC Analysis) Part I

Electronic Circuits. Prof. Dr. Qiuting Huang Integrated Systems Laboratory

and V DS V GS V T (the saturation region) I DS = k 2 (V GS V T )2 (1+ V DS )

ESE319 Introduction to Microelectronics Common Emitter BJT Amplifier

Stability and Frequency Compensation

ECE 3050A, Spring 2004 Page 1. FINAL EXAMINATION - SOLUTIONS (Average score = 78/100) R 2 = R 1 =

(Refer Slide Time: 1:41)

Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT) - Introduction

Circle the one best answer for each question. Five points per question.

OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIER APPLICATIONS

EE221 Circuits II. Chapter 14 Frequency Response

Frequency Dependent Aspects of Op-amps

EE 466/586 VLSI Design. Partha Pande School of EECS Washington State University

EECS240 Spring Today s Lecture. Lecture 2: CMOS Technology and Passive Devices. Lingkai Kong EECS. EE240 CMOS Technology

EE221 Circuits II. Chapter 14 Frequency Response

Two-Port Noise Analysis

ECE 6412, Spring Final Exam Page 1 FINAL EXAMINATION NAME SCORE /120

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

Transcription:

EE05 Fall 205 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Frequency Response Prof. Ming C. Wu wu@eecs.berkeley.edu 5 Sutardja Dai Hall (SDH)

Amplifier Frequency Response: Lower and Upper Cutoff Frequency Midband gain A mid and upper and lower cutoff frequencies ω H and ω L that define bandwidth of an amplifier are often of more interest than the complete transfer function Coupling and bypass capacitors (~ μμf) determine ω L Transistor (and stray) capacitances (~ pf) determine ω H

Lower Cutoff Frequency (ω L ) Approximation: Short-Circuit Time Constant (SCTC) Method. Identify all coupling and bypass capacitors 2. Pick one capacitor (CC ii ) at a time, replace all others with short circuits 3. Replace independent voltage source with short, and independent current source with open 4. Calculate the resistance (RR iiss ) in parallel with CC ii 5. Calculate the time constant, RR iiii CC ii 6. Repeat this for each of the n capacitor 7. The low cut-off frequency can be approximated by n ω L R is C i i= Note: this is an approximation. The real low cut-off is slightly lower

Lower Cutoff Frequency (ω L ) Using SCTC Method for CS Amplifier SCTC Method: f L n 2π i= R is C i For the Common-Source Amplifier: f L # % 2π $ R S C + + R 2S C 2 R 3S C 3 & ( '

Lower Cutoff Frequency (ω L ) Using SCTC Method for CS Amplifier Using the SCTC method: f L " $ 2π # R S C + + R 2S C 2 R 3S C 3 % ' & For C 2 : R 3S = R 3 + R D ( R id ) = R 3 + R D r o ( ) For C : R S = R I + R G ( R ig ) = R I + R G For C 3 : R 2S = R S R is = R S g m

Design: How Do We Choose the Coupling and Bypass Capacitor Values? Since the impedance of a capacitor increases with decreasing frequency, coupling/bypass capacitors reduce amplifier gain at low frequencies. To choose capacitor values, the short-circuit time constant (SCTC) method is used: each capacitor is considered separately with all other capacitors replaced by short circuits. To be able to neglect a capacitor at a given frequency, the magnitude of the capacitor s impedance must be much smaller than the equivalent resistance appearing at its terminals at that frequency

Coupling and Bypass Capacitor Design Common-Source Amplifiers For the C-S Amplifier: R in = R G R in CS For coupling capacitor C : C >> ( ) ω R I + R in For coupling capacitor C 3 : C 2 >> ( ) ω R 3 + R out R out = R D CS R out

Lower Cutoff Frequency f L Dominant Pole Design Instead of having the lower cutoff frequency set by the interaction of several poles, it can be set by the pole associated with just one of the capacitors. The other capacitors are then chosen to have their pole frequencies much below f L. The capacitor associated with the emitter or source part of the circuit tends to be the largest due to low resistance presented by emitter or source terminal of transistor and is commonly used to set f L. Values of other capacitors are increased by a factor of 0 to push their corresponding poles to much lower frequencies.

Capacitively Coupled CS Amplifier Find the pole frequency associated with each coupling/bypass capacitor:

Low Frequency Response Figure 0.7 Sketch of the low-frequency magnitude response of a CS amplifier for which the three pole frequencies are sufficiently separated for their effects to appear distinct.

High Frequency Response

Capacitors in MOS Device C gs = (2 / 3)WLC ox + C ov C gd = C ov C sb = C jsb (area + perimeter) junction C db = C jdb (area + perimeter) junction

(Simplified) High-Frequency Equivalent-Circuit Model for MOSFET Capacitances between source/body, C sb, and between drain/body, C db, are neglected

Intrinsic Response of FET: Unity-Gain Frequency, f T f T : defined as frequency at which short-circuit current gain = f T : a figure-of-merit for transistor speed V gs = KCL: I o + I i sc gs + sc gd V gs / sc gd = g m V gs I o = g m V gs sc gd V gs g m V gs = g m I i sc gs + sc gd Drain is grounded (short-circuit load) As gate length reduces in advanced technology node, C gs reduces and f T increases A I = I o I i = s = jω I o I i = ω T = g m sc gs + sc gd g m ω(c gs + C gd ) g m C gs + C gd

Common-Source Voltage Amplifier Small-signal model: C sb is connected to ground on both sides, therefore can be ignored R S Can solve problem directly by nodal analysis or using 2-port models of transistor OK if circuit is small (-2 nodes) We can find the complete transfer function of the circuit, but in many cases it s good enough to get an estimate of the -3dB bandwidth

CS Voltage Amp Small-Signal Model Two Nodes! Easy For now we will ignore C db to simplify the math

Frequency Response KCL at input and output nodes;; analysis is made complicated V out = g m r o R L V in + jω /ω p [ ]( jω /ω z ) ( )( + jω /ω ) p2 Zero Low-frequency gain: ( ) ( )( + j0) V out = g r R m o L j0 V in + j0 g m Two Poles r o R L Zero: ω z = g m C gs + C gd

Calculating the Poles ω p ω p2 { } + R s C gs + ( + g m R out )C gd R out / R S R S C gs + ( + g m R out )C gd { } + R out C gd R out C gd Usually >> Results of complete analysis: not exact and little insight These poles are calculated after doing some algebraic manipulations on the circuit. It s hard to get any intuition from the above expressions. There must be an easier way!

Method: The Miller Effect

The Miller Effect

Using The Miller Effect Effective input capacitance: C in = jωc Miller = A v,cgd jωc gd = jω ( A vcgd )C gd

CS Voltage Amp Small-Signal Model Modified Small-Signal Model with Miller Effect: C gs +C Miller We can approximate the first pole by using Miller capacitance This gives us a good approximation of the -3dB bandwidth

Comparison with Exact Analysis Miller result (calculate RC time constant of input pole): Exact result: ω p ω p = R S C gs + ( + g m R out ʹ )C gd = R S C gs + ( + g m R out ʹ )C gd + R out ʹ C gd As a result of the Miller effect there is a fundamental gain-bandwidth tradeoff

Common Drain Amplifier Calculate Bandwidth of the Common Drain (Source- Follower) Procedure:. Replace current source with MOSFET-based current mirror 2. Draw small-signal model with capacitors (for simplicity, we will focus on C gd and C gs ) 3. Find the DC small-signal gain 4. Use the Miller effect to calculate the input capacitance 5. Calculate the dominant pole

Small-Signal Model with Capacitors R S Find DC Gain Find Miller capacitor for C gs -- note that the gatesource capacitor is between the input and output!

Voltage Gain Across C gs Write KCL at output node: v out r o r oc = g m v gs = g m (v in v out ) v out + g m r o r = g v m in oc v out v in = r o g m + g r m oc = g m (r o r oc ) + g m (r o r oc ) = A vcgs

Compute Miller Effected Capacitance Now use the Miller Effect to compute C in : Remember that C gs is the capacitor from the input to the output R S C in = C gd + C M C in = C gd + ( A vcgs )C gs Miller Cap C in = C gd + ( g m (r o r oc ) + g m (r o r oc ) )C gs C in = C gd + ( + g m (r o r oc ) )C gs C in C gd (for large g m (r o //r oc ))

Bandwidth of Source Follower Input low-pass filter s 3 db frequency: C ω p = R S C gd + gs + g m (r o r oc ) Substitute favorable values of R S, r o : R» / S g m ω p / g m ( ) C gd + C gs r o >>/ g m C gd / g m + BIG ω p g m / C gd Very high frequency! Model not valid at these high frequencies

Common Source Amplifier: Some Examples A vcgd = Negative, large number (-00) C Miller = ( A V,Cgd )C gd 00C gd Miller Multiplied Cap has detrimental impact on bandwidth Common Drain Amplifier: A vcgs = Slightly less than C Miller = ( A V,Cgs )C gs! 0 Bootstrapped cap has negligible impact on bandwidth!