Quantum Field Theory I

Similar documents
Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

Particle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet

2 Quantization of the scalar field

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

Maxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density

Exercises Symmetries in Particle Physics

MSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00

We start by recalling electrodynamics which is the first classical field theory most of us have encountered in theoretical physics.

3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 2016

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Quantization of Scalar Field

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

The Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz

Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions

CHAPTER 1. SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

Attempts at relativistic QM

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

Quantum Field Theory II

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

Maxwell s equations. based on S-54. electric field charge density. current density

Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 4 Michelmas Term 2011

11 Spinor solutions and CPT

Quantum Electrodynamics 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon Physics 666, Quantum Field Theory April 2001

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

QFT Perturbation Theory

1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in

QFT Perturbation Theory

L = 1 2 µφ µ φ m2 2 φ2 λ 0

Quantum Field Theory Spring 2019 Problem sheet 3 (Part I)

1 Free real scalar field

Chapter 1 LORENTZ/POINCARE INVARIANCE. 1.1 The Lorentz Algebra

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12

Instructor: Sudipta Mukherji, Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar

3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field

Lagrangian. µ = 0 0 E x E y E z 1 E x 0 B z B y 2 E y B z 0 B x 3 E z B y B x 0. field tensor. ν =

Section 4: The Quantum Scalar Field

Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields

The Feynman Propagator and Cauchy s Theorem

Loop corrections in Yukawa theory based on S-51

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

GENERAL RELATIVITY: THE FIELD THEORY APPROACH

THE QFT NOTES 5. Badis Ydri Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Annaba University, Annaba, Algeria. December 9, 2011

Canonical Quantization C6, HT 2016

Disclaimer. [disclaimer]

H =Π Φ L= Φ Φ L. [Φ( x, t ), Φ( y, t )] = 0 = Φ( x, t ), Φ( y, t )

129 Lecture Notes More on Dirac Equation

1 Equal-time and Time-ordered Green Functions

SISSA entrance examination (2007)

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.

High energy hadronic interactions in QCD and applications to heavy ion collisions

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Dynamics of Relativistic Particles and EM Fields

Calculating cross-sections in Compton scattering processes

be stationary under variations in A, we obtain Maxwell s equations in the form ν J ν = 0. (7.5)

FYS 3120: Classical Mechanics and Electrodynamics

Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes

Loop Corrections: Radiative Corrections, Renormalization and All

Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2013

Introduction to gauge theory

Properties of the S-matrix

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

QED and the Standard Model Autumn 2014

(a p (t)e i p x +a (t)e ip x p

752 Final. April 16, Fadeev Popov Ghosts and Non-Abelian Gauge Fields. Tim Wendler BYU Physics and Astronomy. The standard model Lagrangian

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ

Introduction to String Theory ETH Zurich, HS11. 9 String Backgrounds

Finite Temperature Field Theory

Intercollegiate post-graduate course in High Energy Physics. Paper 1: The Standard Model

2.4 Parity transformation

Exercise 1 Classical Bosonic String

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II

What s up with those Feynman diagrams? an Introduction to Quantum Field Theories

Preliminaries: what you need to know

Parity P : x x, t t, (1.116a) Time reversal T : x x, t t. (1.116b)

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

Week 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field

Physics 217 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Fall u(p,λ) by any method of your choosing.

Quantum Field Theory 2 nd Edition

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Quantum Field Theory. and the Standard Model. !H Cambridge UNIVERSITY PRESS MATTHEW D. SCHWARTZ. Harvard University

Introduction to particle physics Lecture 6

PROBLEM SET 1 SOLUTIONS

Week 1, solution to exercise 2

Vector Fields. It is standard to define F µν = µ ϕ ν ν ϕ µ, so that the action may be written compactly as

Lecture notes for FYS610 Many particle Quantum Mechanics

Numerical Methods in Quantum Field Theories

Physics 217 Solution Set #5 Fall 2016

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Wednesday March 30 ± ǁ

1 The muon decay in the Fermi theory

2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections

232A Lecture Notes Representation Theory of Lorentz Group

The path integral for photons

Transcription:

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Sets ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert

c 2014 ETH Zurich This document as well as its parts is protected by copyright. Reproduction of any part in any form without prior written consent of ETH Zurich is permissible only for private, scientific and non-commercial use.

Contents Sheet 1 1.1 1.1. Classical particle in an electromagnetic field................. 1.1 1.2. Stress-energy tensor.............................. 1.1 1.3. Coherent quantum oscillator......................... 1.2 1.4. Relativistic point particle........................... 1.2 Sheet 2 2.1 2.1. Integral definition of the step function.................... 2.1 2.2. Discrete and continuous treatment of a 1D spring lattice.......... 2.2 2.3. Classical field momentum........................... 2.2 Sheet 3 3.1 3.1. Scalar field correlator............................. 3.1 3.2. Commutator and Causality.......................... 3.2 3.3. Retarded propagator............................. 3.2 3.4. Complex scalar field.............................. 3.2 Sheet 4 4.1 4.1. Representations of the Lorentz algebra.................... 4.1 4.2. Conservation of charge with complex scalar fields.............. 4.1 4.3. Symmetry of the stress-energy tensor.................... 4.2 Sheet 5 5.1 5.1. Properties of gamma-matrices........................ 5.1 5.2. Dirac and Weyl representations of the gamma-matrices.......... 5.1 5.3. Spinor rotations................................ 5.2 Sheet 6 6.1 6.1. Completeness for gamma-matrices...................... 6.1 6.2. Spinors, spin sums and completeness relations................ 6.1 6.3. Gordon identity................................ 6.2 6.4. Fierz identity.................................. 6.2 Sheet 7 7.1 7.1. Helicity and chirality............................. 7.1 7.2. Electrodynamics................................ 7.2 Sheet 8 8.1 8.1. The massive vector field............................ 8.1 8.2. Hamiltonian formulation........................... 8.1 8.3. Commutators................................. 8.1 8.4. Polarisation vectors of a massless vector field................ 8.2 Sheet 9 9.1 9.1. Photon propagator............................... 9.1 9.2. Evolution operator............................... 9.1 9.3. Wick s theorem................................ 9.1 3

Sheet 10 10.1 10.1. Four-point interaction in scalar QED.................... 10.1 Sheet 11 11.1 11.1. Optical theorem............................... 11.1 11.2. Møller scattering............................... 11.1 11.3. Kinematics in 2 2 scattering....................... 11.1 Sheet 12 12.1 12.1. Volume of higher-dimensional spheres.................... 12.1 12.2. Muon pair production............................ 12.1 Sheet 13 13.1 13.1. Feynman and Schwinger parameters.................... 13.1 13.2. Electron self energy structure........................ 13.1 Sheet 14 14.1 14.1. A one-loop correction to scattering in QED................ 14.1 4

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 1 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 1.1. Classical particle in an electromagnetic field Consider the classical Lagrangian density of a particle of mass m and charge q, moving in an electromagnetic field, specified by the electric potential φ( x, t) and the magnetic vector potential A( x, t): L = 1 2 m x 2 + q A x qφ. (1.1) Determine the following quantities, and compare the results to those for a free particle: a) the canonical momentum p i conjugate to the coordinate x i ; b) the equations of motion corresponding to the Lagrangian density; c) the Hamiltonian of the system. 1.2. Stress-energy tensor Consider the variational principle: δs = δ d 4 x L(φ, ρ) = 0. (1.2) The Lagrangian density L is a function of the classical field φ(x) and its derivative ρ µ (x) = µ φ(x). Note that L does not depend directly on the spacetime coordinate x µ, but only indirectly through φ and ρ. Show that the conserved Noether current associated to infinitesimal spacetime translations is the stress-energy tensor T µν given by δx µ = ɛ µ (1.3) T µν = L ρ µ ρ ν + η µν L. (1.4) Remind yourself how a general function f(x µ ) of the spacetime coordinates will transform under an infinitesimal translation. Note: η µν = diag( 1, +1, +1, +1) is the metric tensor. 1.1

1.3. Coherent quantum oscillator Consider the Hamiltonian of a quantum harmonic oscillator: H = p2 2m + mω2 x 2. (1.5) 2 a) Introduce ladder operators to diagonalise the Hamiltonian. b) Calculate the expectation values of the number operator N a a as well as of the x and p operator in a general number state n. c) Calculate the variances x, p and N in the same state n and use them to determine the Heisenberg uncertainty of n. d) Show that the coherent state α = e αp 0 (1.6) is an eigenstate of the annihilation operator you defined in part a). e) Calculate the time-dependent expectation values of x, p and N, α x(t) α, α p(t) α, α N(t) α, (1.7) as well as the corresponding variances to determine the uncertainty of the state α. Compare your result with the result obtained in part c). 1.4. Relativistic point particle The action of a relativistic point particle is given by S = α ds (1.8) with the relativistic line element and α a (yet to be determined) constant. P ds 2 = η µν dx µ dx ν = dt 2 dx 2 dy 2 dz 2 (1.9) The path P between two points x µ 1 and x µ 2 can be parametrised by a parameter τ. With that, the integral of the line element ds becomes an integral over the parameter τ2 x S = α dτ η µ x ν µν τ 1 τ τ. (1.10) a) Parametrise the path by the time coordinate t = x 0 and take the non-relativistic limit x 1 to determine the value of the constant α. b) Derive the equations of motion by varying the action. Hint: You may want to determine the canonically conjugate momentum first. 1.2

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 2 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 2.1. Integral definition of the step function In this exercise we will demonstrate that: where: θ(x) = { 1 if x > 0, 0 if x < 0, d θ(x) = δ(x), (2.1) dx A dx δ(x) f(x) = { f(0) if 0 A, To that end, consider the following function (where x, z R, ε > 0): F (x, ε) = 1 2πi + dz 0 otherwise. (2.2) eixz z iε. (2.3) a) Consider a semi-circular path γ ± (R) of radius R in the upper/lower half of the complex plane and ending on the real axis. x > 0 R x < 0 γ + γ Im z iε Re z +R (2.4) Argue that: lim R lim R γ + (R) γ (R) dz dz eixz z iε eixz z iε = 0 if x > 0, = 0 if x < 0. (2.5) Hint: Use integration by parts to improve convergence of the integral. b) Consider the closed path Γ = [ R, +R] γ ± (R) and make use of the Cauchy integral formula: 1 dz f(z) = Res Γ f, (2.6) 2πi Γ where Res Γ f is the sum of the residues of the poles of f surrounded by the contour Γ, to show that: lim F (x, ε) = θ(x). (2.7) ε 0 + c) Finally, using (2.3), show relation (2.1). You will have to perform some mathematically questionable steps. Which are they precisely? Can they be justified? How? 2.1

2.2. Discrete and continuous treatment of a 1D spring lattice Consider a one-dimensional array of N particles at positions q i (t), i = 1,..., N connected by elastic springs with spring force constant κ. Assume that all of the particles have mass m, and at rest their relative distance is a. a) Derive the Lagrangian L(q i (t), q i (t)) of this system and compute the Euler Lagrange equations. b) Determine the continuum form of these equations by taking the limit a 0 and N, where the mass density µ := lim a 0 (m/a) and the elastic modulus Y := lim a 0 (κa) are kept fixed, and: q i (t) φ(x 0 + ia, t) where i Z. c) Directly take the continuum limit of L(q i (t), q i (t)) and show that the Euler Lagrange equations of the Lagrangian density L(φ, φ, φ) are the same as those obtained in part b). 2.3. Classical field momentum Consider the Lagrangian of a real scalar field φ = φ(x): L = 1 2 µφ µ φ 1 2 m2 φ 2. (2.8) a) Write down the stress-energy tensor of the theory using the general result obtained in problem 1.2. b) Derive: P µ = by using the definition: P µ = d 3 x T 0µ. d 3 p (2π) 3 2e( p) pµ ( p) a ( p)a( p) (2.9) c) Calculate the Poisson bracket {P µ, φ( x)} and interpret the result. 2.2

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 3 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 3.1. Scalar field correlator In this problem we shall consider the amplitude for a particle to be created at point y and annihilated at point x a) Use the Fourier expansion of φ(x) to show that + (y, x) := i 0 φ(y)φ(x) 0. (3.1) + (y, x) = i where p 0 = e( p) := p 2 + m 2. d 3 p (2π) 3 2e( p) eip (y x), (3.2) b) Observe that the amplitude for the propagation of a particle from y to x satisfies + (y, x) = + (y x, 0) =: + (y x). (3.3) What are the properties of + under translations and Lorentz transformations? c) Express + (x) for a time-like x as a single integral over the energy, and the one for space-like x as a single integral over p = p. Hint: Use a Lorentz transformation to reduce to the cases x = 0 and x 0 = 0 respectively. d) Use Cauchy s residue theorem to show that + (x) can be also written as + (x) = C + d 4 p (2π) 4 e ip x p 2 + m 2, (3.4) where the integration over the contour C + given in the left figure of (3.6) corresponds to the (complex) variable p 0. e) Show that + (x) satisfies the Klein Gordon equation, i.e. ( 2 + m 2 ) + (x) = 0. (3.5) Im p 0 Im p 0 C + e( p) +e( p) Re p 0 e( p) C R Re p 0 (3.6) +e( p) 3.1

3.2. Commutator and Causality In order to know whether a measurement of the field at x can affect another measurement at y, one may compute the commutator (y x) := i 0 [φ(y), φ(x)] 0 = + (y x) + (x y). (3.7) Show that such a commutator vanishes for a space-like separation of x and y, which proves that causality is obeyed. 3.3. Retarded propagator Now consider the commutator (3.7) and define which clearly vanishes for any y 0 < x 0. a) Show that G R (y x) := θ(y 0 x 0 ) (y x), (3.8) G R (x) = C R d 4 p (2π) 4 with the contour C R given in the right figure of (3.6). e ip x p 2 + m 2, (3.9) b) Check that G R is a Green function for the Klein Gordon equation, ( 2 + m 2 )G R (x) = δ 4 (x). (3.10) 3.4. Complex scalar field We want to investigate the theory of a complex scalar field φ = φ(x). described by the Lagrangian density: The theory is L = µ φ µ φ m 2 φ φ. (3.11) As a complex scalar field has two degrees of freedom, we can treat φ and φ as independent fields with one degree of freedom each. a) Find the conjugate momenta π( x) and π ( x) to φ( x) and φ ( x) and the canonical commutation relations. Note: we choose π = L/ φ rather than π = L/ φ. b) Find the Hamiltonian of the theory. c) Introduce creation and annihilation operators to diagonalise the Hamiltonian. d) Show that the theory contains two sets of particles of mass m. e) Consider the conserved charge Q = i 2 d 3 x (πφ φ π ). (3.12) Rewrite it in terms of ladder operators and determine the charges of the two particle species. 3.2

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 4 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 4.1. Representations of the Lorentz algebra The Lie algebra of the Lorentz group is given by [M µν, M λκ ] = i(η µκ M νλ + η νλ M µκ η νκ M µλ η µλ M νκ ). (4.1) a) Show that the generators of the vector representation satisfy the Lie algebra (4.1). b) Show that the operators satisfy the Lie algebra (4.1). (J µν ) ρ σ i(η µρ δ ν σ η νρ δ µ σ) (4.2) L µν i(x µ ν x ν µ ) (4.3) 4.2. Conservation of charge with complex scalar fields Consider a free complex scalar field described by a) Show that the transformation leaves the Lagrangian density invariant. L = ( µ φ )( µ φ) m 2 φ φ. (4.4) φ(x) φ (x) = e iα φ(x) (4.5) b) Find the conserved current associated with this symmetry. If we now consider two complex scalar fields, the Lagrangian density is given by c) Show that L = ( µ φ a)( µ φ a ) m 2 φ aφ a, a = 1, 2. (4.6) φ a (x) φ a (x) = U a bφ b (x) (4.7) with U U(2) = { A C 2 2 : A 1 = A = (A ) T} is a symmetry transformation. d) Show that now there are four conserved charges: one given by the generalisation of part b), and the other three given by Q i = i d 3 x ( φ 2 a(σ i ) a bπ b π a (σ i ) a bφ b), (4.8) where σ i are the Pauli matrices. 4.1

4.3. Symmetry of the stress-energy tensor Consider a relativistic scalar field theory specified by some Lagrangian L(φ, φ). a) Compute the variation of L(φ(x), φ(x)) under infinitesimal Lorentz transformations (note: ω µν = ω νµ ) x µ x µ ω µ νx ν. (4.9) b) Assuming that L(x) transforms as a scalar field, i.e. just like φ(x), derive another expression for its variation under Lorentz transformations. c) Compare the two expressions to show that the two indices of the stress-energy tensor are symmetric T µν = δl δ( µ φ) ν φ + η µν L = T νµ. (4.10) 4.2

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 5 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 5.1. Properties of gamma-matrices The gamma-matrices satisfy a Clifford algebra, {γ µ, γ ν } = 2η µν id. (5.1) Note: The minus sign in the Clifford algebra is a matter of convention. a) Show the following contraction identities using (5.1): b) Show the following trace properties using (5.1): γ µ γ µ = 4 id, (5.2) γ µ γ ν γ µ = 2γ ν, (5.3) γ µ γ ν γ ρ γ µ = 4η νρ id, (5.4) γ µ γ ν γ ρ γ σ γ µ = 2γ σ γ ρ γ ν. (5.5) tr(γ µ1 γ µn ) = 0 for odd n, (5.6) tr(γ µ γ ν ) = 4η µν, (5.7) tr(γ µ γ ν γ ρ γ σ ) = 4(η µν η ρσ η µρ η νσ + η µσ η νρ ). (5.8) 5.2. Dirac and Weyl representations of the gamma-matrices Using the Pauli matrices σ i, i = 1, 2, 3, together with the 2 2 identity matrix σ 0, ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 0 0 1 0 i 1 0 σ 0, σ 1, σ 2, σ 3, (5.9) 0 1 1 0 i 0 0 1 we can realise the Dirac representation of the gamma-matrices, γ 0 D σ 0 σ 3, γ j D σj iσ 2 (j = 1, 2, 3), (5.10) where the tensor product can be written as a 4 4 matrix in 2 2 block form as follows ( ) B11 A B A B 12 A. (5.11) B 21 A B 22 A Denoting the Pauli matrices collectively by σ µ and defining ( σ 0, σ i ) = (σ 0, σ i ). We can then define the gamma-matrices in the Weyl representation: ( ) γ µ 0 σ W µ σ µ. (5.12) 0 Show that both representations satisfy the Clifford algebra (5.1). Can you show their equivalence, i.e. γ µ W = T γµ D T 1 for some matrix T? Hint: It may help to write the γ µ W as tensor products of Pauli matrices. 5.1

5.3. Spinor rotations The Dirac equation is invariant under Lorentz transformations Ψ (x ) = SΨ(x) if the spinor transformation matrix S satisfies Λ µ ν S 1 γ ν S = γ µ. (5.13) For an infinitesimal Lorentz transformation Λ µν = η µν + δω µν this is fulfilled if S = 1 + 1 8 δω µν[γ µ, γ ν ]. (5.14) a) Find the infinitesimal spinor transformation δs for a rotation around the z-axis, i.e. only non-zero components of δω µν are δω 12 = δω 21 0. b) Finite transformations are obtained by considering a consecutive application of infinitely many, N, infinitesimal transformations δω = ω/n ( S = lim 1 + 1 ) N ω µν N 8 N [γµ, γ ν ] = exp ( 1 ω 8 µν[γ µ, γ ν ] ). (5.15) Compute the finite rotation with angle ω 12 around the same axis as before. compute the finite transformation Λ = exp(ω) for vectors. Also c) What happens to the individual components of a spinor under this transformation? What is the period of the transformation in the angle ω 12? Compare it to the finite rotation for vectors. 5.2

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 6 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 6.1. Completeness for gamma-matrices An arbitrary product of gamma-matrices is proportional to one of the following 16 linearly independent matrices Γ a (here a is a multi-index which specifies the type of matrix, S, P, V, A, T, along the corresponding indices if any) Γ S = 1, (6.1) Γ P = γ 5, (6.2) Γ V,µ = γ µ, (6.3) Γ A,µ = iγ 5 γ µ, (6.4) Γ T,µν = i 2 [γµ, γ ν ]. (6.5) a) Show that the trace of any product of Γ s is given by tr(γ a Γ b ) = ±4δ ab. For simplicity we ignore the signs arising from the Lorentz signature. b) Show that for any a b there is a n S such that Γ a Γ b = αγ n with some α C. c) Show that the matrices are linearly independent and therefor form a complete basis of 4 4 spinor matrices. Hint: To do this consider a sum a α aγ a = 0. What can be said about the coefficients? 6.2. Spinors, spin sums and completeness relations In this exercise we will use the Weyl representation (5.12) defined in the previous exercise sheet. a) Show that (p σ)(p σ) = p 2. b) Prove that the below 4-spinor u α ( p) solves Dirac s equation (p µ γ µ + m id)u α ( p) = 0 ( ) p σ ξα u α ( p) = p, (6.6) σ ξα where ξ ± form a basis of 2-spinors. c) Suppose, the 2-spinors ξ + and ξ are orthonormal. What does it imply for ξ αξ α and ξ α ξ α? (6.7) α {+, } d) Show that ū α ( p)u α ( p) = 2m for α {+, }. e) Show the completeness relation: u α ( p)ū α ( p) = p µ γ µ + m id. (6.8) α {+, } 6.1

6.3. Gordon identity Prove the Gordon identity, ū β ( q)γ µ u α ( p) = 1 2m ūβ( q) [ id(q + p) µ + 1 2 [γµ, γ ν ](q p) ν ] uα ( p). (6.9) Hint: You can do this using just {γ µ, γ ν } = 2η µν id. 6.4. Fierz identity a) Use the linear independence of the Γ a matrices to show that δ α γ δ β δ = i 1 4 (Γ i) α δ(γ i ) β γ. (6.10) Hint: Decompose an arbitrary matrix M α β = i m i(γ i ) α β and find the coefficients m i. b) Use the result from a) to show the Fierz identity: (Γ i ) α β(γ j ) γ δ = k,l 1 16 tr(γ i Γ l Γ j Γ k )(Γ k ) α δ(γ l ) γ β. (6.11) c) Find the Fierz transformation for the spinor products (ū 1 u 2 )(ū 3 u 4 ) and (ū 1 γ µ u 2 )(ū 3 γ µ u 4 ). (6.12) 6.2

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 7 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 7.1. Helicity and chirality In four dimensions we can define the chirality operator as a) Show that γ 5 satisfies γ 5 := iγ 0 γ 1 γ 2 γ 3. (7.1) {γ 5, γ µ } = 0, ( γ 5 ) 2 = 1. (7.2) b) Show that the operators P R,L = 1 ± γ 5, (7.3) 2 are two orthogonal projectors to the chiral subspaces and that they satisfy the completeness relation P L + P R = 1. (7.4) Helicity is defined to be the projection of spin along the direction of motion, Σ h( p) = p. (7.5) p Here, Σ is the spin operator which is given in the Weyl representation by Σ = 1 2 ( σ 0 0 σ ). (7.6) c) Show that helicity and chirality are equivalent for a massless spinor u s ( p). Now consider the Dirac Lagrangian d) Find the corresponding Hamiltonian. L = ψ (iγ µ µ m) ψ. (7.7) e) Show that chirality is not conserved for a massive fermion by computing the equations of motions for the chiral fermions ψ L and ψ R, with ψ L,R = P L,R ψ. (7.8) f) Show that helicity is conserved, then argue it is not Lorentz invariant for m 0. g) Show that for m = 0 the Dirac Lagrangian is invariant under a chiral transformation U = exp( iαγ 5 ) of the fields, and derive the associated conserved current. Show that having a non-zero mass breaks the symmetry. 7.1

7.2. Electrodynamics Consider the Lagrange density L(A µ ) = 1 4 F µνf µν J µ A µ, where F µν = µ A ν ν A µ, (7.9) and J µ is some external source field. a) Show that the Euler Lagrange equations are the inhomogeneous Maxwell equations. The usual electromagnetic fields are defined by E i = F 0i and ε ijk B k = F ij. What about the homogeneous Maxwell equations? b) Construct the stress-energy tensor for this theory. c) Convince yourself that the stress-energy tensor is not symmetric. In order to make it symmetric consider ˆT µν = T µν λ K λµ,ν, (7.10) where K λµ,ν is anti-symmetric in the first two indices. By taking K λµ,ν = F µλ A ν (7.11) show that the modified stress-energy tensor ˆT µν is symmetric, and that it leads to the standard formulae for the electromagnetic energy and momentum densities E = 1 2 ( E 2 + B 2 ), S = E B. (7.12) d) for fun: Show that all Maxwell equations can summarised as γ ν γ ρ γ σ ν F ρσ = 2γ ν J ν. (7.13) 7.2

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 8 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 8.1. The massive vector field Consider the Lagrangian for the free massive spin-1 field V µ : L = 1 2 µ V ν µ V ν + 1 2 µ V ν ν V µ 1 2 m2 V µ V µ. (8.1) a) Derive the Euler Lagrange equations of motion for V µ. b) By taking a derivative of the equation, show that V µ is a conserved current. c) Show that V µ satisfies the Klein Gordon equation. 8.2. Hamiltonian formulation The Hamiltonian formulation of the massive vector is somewhat tedious due to the presence of constraints. a) Derive the momenta Π µ conjugate to the fields V µ. Considering the space and time components separately, what do you notice? Your observation is related to constraints. The time component V 0 of the vector field is completely determined by the spatial components and their conjugate momenta (without making reference to time derivatives). b) Use the equations derived in problem 8.1 to show that V 0 = m 2 k Π k, V0 = k V k. (8.2) c) Substitute this solution for V 0 and V 0 into the Lagrangian and perform a Legendre transformation to obtain the Hamiltonian. Show that ( H = d 3 1 x Π 2 kπ k + 1 2 m 2 k Π k l Π l + 1 2 kv l k V l 1 2 lv k k V l + 1 2 m2 V k V k ). (8.3) d) Derive the Hamiltonian equations of motion for V k and Π k, and compare them to the results of problem 8.1. 8.3. Commutators The unequal time commutators [V µ (x), V ν (y)] = i V µν(x y) for the massive vector field read V µν(x) = ( η µν m 2 µ ν ) (x), (8.4) where (x) is the corresponding function for the scalar field. a) Show that these obey the equations derived in problem 8.1. b) Show explicitly that they obey the constraint equations in 8.2b), i.e. [ m 2 V 0 (x) + k Π k (x), V ν (y) ] = [ V0 (x) k V k (x), V ν (y) ] = 0. (8.5) c) Confirm that the equal time commutators take the canonical form [V k ( x), V l ( y)] = [Π k ( x), Π l ( y)] = 0, [V k ( x), Π l ( y)] = iδ kl δ 3 ( x y). (8.6) 8.1

8.4. Polarisation vectors of a massless vector field Each Fourier mode in the plane wave expansion of a massless vector field has the form A (λ) µ ( p; x) = N( p) ɛ (λ) µ ( p) e ip x. (8.7) Without any loss of generality the polarisation vectors ɛ (λ) µ ( p) can be chosen to form a four-dimensional orthonormal system satisfying a) Show that the following choice satisfies (8.8) ɛ (λ) µ ( p) ɛ (κ)µ ( p) = η λκ. (8.8) ɛ (0) µ ( p) = n µ, (8.9) ɛ (1) µ ( p) = (0, ɛ (1) ( p)), (8.10) ɛ (2) µ ( p) = (0, ɛ (2) ( p)), (8.11) ɛ (3) µ ( p) = (p µ + n µ (p n)) / p n, (8.12) where n µ = (1, 0) and p ɛ (k) ( p) = 0 as well as ɛ (k) ( p) ɛ (l) ( p) = δ kl. b) Use the polarisation vectors to verify the completeness relation 3 λ=0 c) Show for the physical modes of the photon that 2 λ=1 η λλ ɛ (λ) µ ( p) ɛ (λ) ν ( p) = η µν. (8.13) ɛ (λ) µ ( p) ɛ (λ) ν ( p) = η µν p µp ν (p n) p µn ν + p ν n µ. (8.14) 2 p n 8.2

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 9 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 9.1. Photon propagator The Lagrangian density in the covariant gauge reads L = 1 4 F µν(x) F µν (x) 1 2 ξ ( µ A µ (x) ) 2. (9.1) Show that the photon propagator in the covariant gauge with arbitrary gauge parameter ξ is given by ( G V d 4 p e ip(x y) µν(x y) = η (2π) 4 p 2 µν (1 ξ 1 ) p ) µp ν. (9.2) iɛ p 2 Hint: recall that the propagator is the Green function of the equations of motion. 9.2. Evolution operator The interaction picture field operator φ 0 (x) is related to the full Heisenberg field operator φ(x) by φ(t, x) = U(t, t 0 ) 1 φ 0 (t, x)u(t, t 0 ) (9.3) with U(t, t 0 ) = exp ( i(t t 0 )H 0 ) exp ( i(t t0 )H ). (9.4) a) Show that U(t, t 0 ) satisfies the differential equation i t U(t, t 0) = H int (t)u(t, t 0 ) (9.5) with the initial condition U(t 0, t 0 ) = 1. H int (t). Determine the interaction Hamiltonian b) Show that the unique solution to this equation with the same initial condition can be written as ( t ) U(t, t 0 ) = T exp i dt H int (t ). (9.6) t 0 c) Show that the operator satisfies U (t, t 0 ) = U(t 0, t) and U(t 1, t 0 )U(t 0, t 2 ) = U(t 1, t 2 ). 9.3. Wick s theorem Wick s theorem relates the time-ordered product of fields φ 0 (x) to the normal-ordered product plus all possible contractions T [ φ 0 (x 1 )... φ 0 (x m ) ] = N [ φ 0 (x 1 )... φ 0 (x m ) + all contractions ]. (9.7) Prove this theorem by induction. What changes in the case of fermionic operators? 9.1

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 10 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 10.1. Four-point interaction in scalar QED Consider a U(1) gauge theory with two complex massive scalar fields φ, χ and one vector field A µ. Each of the scalar fields is coupled to the gauge field and they both have the same charge q. The Lagrangian density of the theory is given by L = 1 2 (D µφ) D µ φ 1 2 (D µχ) D µ χ 1 2 m2 φ φ 1 2 m2 χ χ 1 4 F µνf µν (10.1) with the covariant derivative D µ = µ iqa µ (x) (10.2) and the associated electromagnetic field strength tensor F µν. Use the Feynman gauge fixing term. In this exercise we want to compute the first interaction term of φ with χ in the expansion in the perturbative parameter q. For this reason we are interested in obtaining the timeordered four-point correlation function for two fields of type φ and two fields of type χ, which is given by 0 T { φ(x 1 )φ (x 2 )χ(x 3 )χ (x 4 ) } 0 { int 0 T φ(x 1 )φ (x 2 )χ(x 3 )χ (x 4 ) exp = lim { T (1 iɛ) 0 T exp [ i T [ i T T d4 x L int (x) a) Find the interaction Lagrangian L int of the theory. ]} T d4 x L int (x) 0 ]}. (10.3) 0 b) What is the leading order of the expansion in q of the time-ordered four-point correlation function that allows for an interaction with the gauge field A µ? c) Expand the denominator in q to the order you just found, then use Wick s theorem to decompose it into terms where all fields are contracted. Can you find a diagrammatic representation for the different contributions? d) Now expand the numerator of the time-ordered four-point correlation function in the same way. It may be useful to draw pictures to simplify the bookkeeping. How can you interpret the terms that do not lead to an interaction of φ and χ? e) Focus on the contribution(s) where φ and χ interact non-trivially: Insert the Fourier transformed propagators of the scalar and vector fields into your result G F (x y) = i 0 T{φ d 4 p e ip(x y) (x)φ(y)} 0 = (2π) 4 p 2 + m 2 iɛ, G µν F (x y) = i 0 T{Aµ (x)a ν d 4 p η µν e ip(x y) (y)} 0 =. (10.4) (2π) 4 p 2 iɛ f) How do you interpret the limit of T in equation (10.3)? Simplify your result by performing the integration over the internal variables. How can you interpret the individual factors in your result? g) Optional: How will your result in f) change if you use a different gauge? E.g. use a Lorenz gauge fixing term with ξ 1. Hint: The gauge affects only G µν F. 10.1

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 11 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 11.1. Optical theorem Write the scattering matrix S in terms of its matrix elements M as S ij = δ ij + (2π) 4 δ 4 (p i p j )im ij (11.1) with the indices i, j enumerating a basis of Fock space (we shall glance over the fact that Fock space is infinite-dimensional). Use unitarity of the scattering matrix, S S = 1, to show the unitarity relation for matrix elements M fi Mif = i (2π) 4 δ 4 (p f p n )M fn Min. (11.2) n 11.2. Møller scattering a) Calculate the O(q 2 ) contribution to the scattering matrix element for Møller scattering: e (p 1, α 1 ) + e (p 2, α 2 ) e (p 3, α 3 ) + e (p 4, α 4 ) (11.3) through direct evaluation in position space. b) Repeat the calculation in part a) using the Feynman rules for QED in momentum space. 11.3. Kinematics in 2 2 scattering Consider a 2 2 particle scattering process with the kinematics p 1 + p 2 p 3 + p 4. a) Show that in the centre-of-mass frame the energies e( p i ) and the norms of momenta p i of the incoming and the outgoing particles are entirely fixed by the total centreof-mass energy s and the particle masses m i. b) Show that the scattering angle θ between p 1 and p 3 is given by ( ) s(t u) + (m 2 1 m 2 θ = arccos 2)(m 2 3 m 2 4) λ(s, m 2 1, m 2 2), (11.4) λ(s, m 2 3, m 2 4) with the Mandelstam variables given by s = (p 1 + p 2 ) 2, t = (p 1 p 3 ) 2, u = (p 1 p 4 ) 2, (11.5) and the Källén function defined as λ(x, y, z) = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 2xy 2xz 2yz. (11.6) c) Show that s + t + u = m 2 1 + m 2 2 + m 2 3 + m 2 4. d) Determine t min and t max from the condition cos θ 1, and study the behaviour of t min and t max in the limit s m 2 i. 11.1

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 12 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 12.1. Volume of higher-dimensional spheres The integrands of D-dimensional integrals often are functions F ( x) = F ( x ) with spherical symmetry (or they can be brought into this form). The angular part of the integral in spherical coordinates yields the volume of the (D 1)-dimensional sphere S D 1 d D x F ( x ) = Vol(S D 1 ) 0 r D 1 dr F (r). (12.1) In particular, in view of the dimensional regularisation scheme, where D is assumed to be a real number, we need a suitable formula for the volume as an analytic function of D. Use the well-known result to show that the volume of the (D 1)-sphere is 12.2. Muon pair production dx exp( x 2 ) = π, (12.2) Vol(S D 1 ) = 2πD/2 Γ(D/2). (12.3) Follow the steps below to calculate the total cross section for the process e + e µ + µ. a) Draw all the diagrams that contribute to this process at the lowest non-trivial order, and use the Feynman rules for QED in momentum space to obtain the scattering amplitude M. b) Compute M 2. Assuming that the particle spins are not measured, sum over the spins of the outgoing particle, and average over those of the incoming ones. This should help you bring your expression for M 2 into a much simpler form. Hint: You might find the completeness relations for spinors useful. c) The differential cross section in the centre-of-mass frame is given by dσ = M 2 4 p 1 s d 3 p 3 (2π) 3 2e( p 3 ) d 3 p 4 (2π) 3 2e( p 4 ) (2π)4 δ 4 (p 1 + p 2 p 3 p 4 ). (12.4) Use the result for M 2 that you obtained above, and integrate over p 3 and p 4 to obtain the total cross section σ = dσ. 12.1

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 13 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 13.1. Feynman and Schwinger parameters a) To evaluate loop diagrams one combines propagators with the use of Feynman parameters. The basic version is 1 AB = 1 0 dx [xa + (1 x)b] 2, (13.1) but it can be generalised to n propagators elevated to some arbitrary power 1 n = Γ ( n i=1 ν ( 1 n ) ( ) i) n n i=1 i=1 Aν i n i i=1 Γ(ν dx i δ 1 x xν i 1 i i i) 0 i=1 i=1 [ n i=1 x n. (13.2) i=1 ia i ] ν i Prove (13.2) recursively. b) Another useful parametrisation is the Schwinger parametrisation: Prove (13.3). 1 A ν = 1 Γ(ν) 13.2. Electron self energy structure 0 dα α ν 1 e αa. (13.3) In QED, the electron two-point function F (p, q) = i(2π) 4 δ 4 (p + q)m(p) receives contributions from self energy diagrams. a) Draw the Feynman diagrams corresponding to the one- and two-loop contributions. Which of these diagrams are one-particle irreducible? b) For the one-loop case, write down the expression for M(p) using the massive QED Feynman rules in momentum space and argue why the integral is divergent. c) Explain why one can make the ansatz M = p γ M V + m M S, (13.4) where M V,S are scalar functions. Write down integral expressions for them. 13.1

Quantum Field Theory I Problem Set 14 ETH Zurich, HS14 Prof. N. Beisert 14.1. A one-loop correction to scattering in QED The aim of this exercise is to gain an insight into the calculation of loop corrections to scattering amplitudes. To this end consider the one-loop corrections to e e e e scattering in QED. a) Draw all amputated and connected graphs that would contribute to this process. You should find ten different contributions. b) How does the field strength renormalisation factor for the spinors, Z ψ = 1+Z (2) ψ +..., contribute at this perturbative order? How does the field strength renormalisation of the photon Z A contribute to the process? Can you sketch suitable Feynman graphs? Now focus on the following diagram: p p k q k (14.1) p k q p c) Write the scattering matrix element corresponding to the amputated Feynman graph, and bring it to the following form im = q 4 v( q)γ µ v( q ) 1 (p p ) 2 iɛ d D k Aµ v( p) (2π) D B v( p ). (14.2) d) Use a suitable Feynman parametrisation to rewrite the denominator B as where 1 1 B = 2 0 1 dx 0 1 dy 0 dz δ(1 x y z) C 3, (14.3) C = k 2 2k (xp + yp ) iɛ. (14.4) Complete the square and show that C can be written as C = k 2 + (1 z) 2 m 2 + xy (p p ) 2 iɛ, k = k xp yp. (14.5) 14.1

e) Show that the numerator A µ can be brought to the form A µ = [ k 2 + 2(1 4z + z 2 )m 2 2(z + xy)(p p ) 2] γ µ + z(1 z)m[γ µ, γ ν ](p p) ν. (14.6) To do so, use: the anti-commutation relations for gamma-matrices (p γ)γ µ = 2p µ γ µ (γ p), (14.7) the Dirac equation, v( p)(γ p) = m v( p), (p γ)v( p ) = mv( p ), (14.8) the symmetry of the integration over k, which allows the following tensorial replacements in the numerator k µ 0, k µ k ν 1 D ηµν k 2, (14.9) the symmetry of the integral under the interchange x y, the Gordon identity v( p)γ µ v( p ) = 1 2m v( p)[ (p + p ) µ 1 2 [γµ, γ ν ](p p ) ν ] v( p ). (14.10) For the remainder of this problem, you may assume that the virtuality of the photon is small, (p p ) 2 m 2. f) Using the results obtained in problem 13.2, integrate over the loop momentum k. Note: Split off a divergent contribution, and cut off the integral as discussed in the lecture. Can you interpret the residual dependence on the cutoff? g) Integrate over x and y. Note: Cut off the integral if needed. Can you interpret the residual dependence on the cutoff? 14.2