HICO Mission Planning and Operations

Similar documents
Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Simulated Radiances for OMI

DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR

PROBA 1. F. Teston ESA/ESTEC D/TEC-EL

What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?

Science planning and operations for Mars Express

Appendix B. A proposition for updating the environmental standards using real Earth Albedo and Earth IR Flux for Spacecraft Thermal Analysis

The Space Situation Monitoring Laboratory What s Happening in Space?

Toshinori Kuwahara*, Yoshihiro Tomioka, Yuta Tanabe, Masato Fukuyama, Yuji Sakamoto, Kazuya Yoshida, Tohoku University, Japan

ERBE Geographic Scene and Monthly Snow Data

Vicky Chu, Jer Ling, Tom Lin, Joe Fong, Feng-Tai Huang, Guey-Shin Chang. April 15, 2011

J. G. Miller (The MITRE Corporation), W. G. Schick (ITT Industries, Systems Division)

Orekit at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. Evan Ward

SP-1291 June Mars Express. The Scientific Investigations

Angelika Dehn Rob Koopman 10 Years GOME on ERS-2 Workshop

Imaging the whole Earth every day. Josh Alban VP, Business Development

JANUARY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY

Chapter 1 0+7= 1+6= 2+5= 3+4= 4+3= 5+2= 6+1= 7+0= How would you write five plus two equals seven?

Long-Term Time Series of Water Vapour Total Columns from GOME, SCIAMACHY and GOME-2

Systems Engineering in Venus Satellite

Improving Space Surveillance with Space-Based Visible Sensor

Detection of ship NO 2 emissions over Europe from satellite observations

A AVHRR NDVI dataset for Svalbard. Stian Solbø, Inge Lauknes, Cecilie Sneberg Grøtteland, Stine Skrunes, Hannah Vickers, Kjell Arild Høgda

Orbit Evolution of the Swarm Mission Detlef Sieg

A Concept of Nanosatellite Small Fleet for Earth Observation

GCOM-C/SGLI and its Lunar Calibration

Thermal And Near infrared Sensor for carbon Observation (TANSO) onboard the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) Research Announcement

MULTI PURPOSE MISSION ANALYSIS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK MUPUMA

Status of CNES Cal/Val Activities

ACHIEVING THE ERS-2 ENVISAT INTER-SATELLITE INTERFEROMETRY TANDEM CONSTELLATION.

Status of VIIRS Reflective Solar Bands On-orbit Calibration and Performance

California OES Weather Threat Briefing

Feasible Mission Designs for Solar Probe Plus to Launch in 2015, 2016, 2017, or November 19, 2008

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

OptElec: an Optimisation Software for Low-Thrust Orbit Transfer Including Satellite and Operation Constraints

Imaging the Coastal Ocean from Space

Determine the trend for time series data

HICO OSU Website and Data Products

I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11. Then, I-10 West at Resler closes for 27 hours on Feb 25

The Orbit Control of ERS-1 and ERS-2 for a Very Accurate Tandem Configuration

AUTOMATED FLIGHT DYNAMICS SYSTEM FOR THAICHOTE SATELLITE

Chart 1 Changing the Perspective: Atmospheric Research on the ISS Prof. Dr. Hansjörg Dittus German Aerospace Center (DLR)

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

GOSAT update. June Prepared by JAXA EORC Presented by David Crisp

SciBox, a Proven Automated Planning and Commanding System

Satellite Constellations for Altimetry

CGMS Baseline. Sustained contributions to the Global Observing System. Endorsed by CGMS-46 in Bengaluru, June 2018

Yahsat s Approach to GEO Collision Avoidance A Case Stduy with STTW-4

HY-2A Satellite User s Guide

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF GEOSTATIONARY-EARTH-ORBIT WITH SIMPLIFIED PERTURBATIONS MODELS

New NASA Ocean Observations and Coastal Applications

Current Status of the ALOS-2 Operation and PALSAR-2 Calibration Activities

Drought in Southeast Colorado

NOAA/NESDIS Tropical Web Page with LEO Satellite Products and Applications for Forecasters

Environmental Radiation Resulting from the Experimental Program at JLab. January March Pavel Degtiarenko. Radiation Control Group Note 04-01

Traveler s Guide to the Planets Mercury & Venus

2003 Moisture Outlook

ANALYSIS OF THE MEGHA-TROPIQUES TRAJECTORY. DETERMINATION OF RENDEZ-VOUS CONDITIONS WITH THE TERRA SATELLITE.

International Space Station (ISS) Nears A Six-Figure Orbit Count

GSICS UV Sub-Group Activities

Experimental Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Satellites due to Atmospheric Perturbations

HICO Calibration and Atmospheric Correction

2019 Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products. ASX Settlement

Pointing Control for Low Altitude Triple Cubesat Space Darts

Copyright 2015 California Institute of Technology. U.S. Government sponsorship acknowledged.

The VENμS mission: Earth Observation with High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Capabilities

Laser de-spin maneuver for an active debris removal mission - a realistic scenario for Envisat

Principles of Satellite Remote Sensing

Passover Days CE

Orbit Representation

Contribution of ISON and KIAM space debris. space

Supplemental info for MCR : Change Science Orbit Period from 11 Days to 14 Days

GLAST Large Area Telescope Monthly Mission Review

SSS retrieval from space Comparison study using Aquarius and SMOS data

Sentinel-1 Mission Overview

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Modeling Updates

SOLVING THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS) MOTION CONTROL LONG-TERM PLANNING PROBLEM

MODULE 2 LECTURE NOTES 1 SATELLITES AND ORBITS

Hopewell Chignecto Cape

Creating Satellite Orbits

Orbit and Transmit Characteristics of the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) JPL Document No. D-29695

Methane Sensing Flight of Scanning HIS over Hutchinson, KS, 31 March 2001

GOCI Radiometric Calibration

Figure 1. View of ALSAT-2A spacecraft

Forecasting Challenges

ASEN 6008: Interplanetary Mission Design Lab Spring, 2015

Name: (This only happens every four years or does it?)

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Chapter 1 The Rain Gauge

MODELLING OF PERTURBATIONS FOR PRECISE ORBIT DETERMINATION

Developments in CALIOP Aerosol Products. Dave Winker

on space debris objects obtained by the

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

Sentinel-1 Long Duration Mutual Interference

Status of S-NPP VIIRS Solar and Lunar Calibration

TWO APPLICATIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR AMVS OF NSMC/CMA

P4.1 CONSENSUS ESTIMATES OF TROPICAL CYCLONE INTENSITY USING MULTISPECTRAL (IR AND MW) SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS

ERS-2 and ENVISAT orbit control Current and future strategy The impact on the interferometric baseline

Learning Lab Seeing the World through Satellites Eyes

California OES Atmospheric River Events Weather Threat Briefing

Transcription:

HICO Mission Planning and Operations Ellen J. Wagner and Marcos Montes Naval Research Laboratory ellen.wagner@nrl.navy.mil Oregon State

Selecting Targets: Part 1 Request through OSU web site Choose coordinates for image center (may need multiple targets to cover area of interest) HICO swath simulator (shows image box for nadir view angle) Names: describe location, abbreviate if possible (i.e. FortPierceInlet_FL) Latitude range: +/- ~52 deg ~2 weeks to get new targets into system from the time NRL-DC receives target info

Selecting Targets: Part 2 Ascending Pass Descending Pass Ascending/Descending passes 1 set of coordinates is appropriate for some targets Other targets have 2 sets of coordinates (TargetName_asc, TargetName_des) Sometimes only 1 set of coordinates for a target that is only to be imaged during one type of overpass

Urban Lake/Urban Coastal/River Grassland Lake Coastal/Desert 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Usable HICO Images (as of 30 August 2010) Desert/Mountains Desert/Lake Forest/Lake River Coastal/Mountains Category Mountains Forest/Coastal Desert Coastal/Urban Open Ocean Coastal/Open Ocean Coastal Number of Images

Scheduling and Commanding Satellite Tool Kit (STK) Analytical Graphics Inc. 220 Valley Creek Blvd, Exton, PA 19341 STK calculates all possible observations in a particular time period by combining: targets ISS predicted attitude ISS predicted ephemeris HICO FOR light/activity constraints Planning Committee determines which targets will be imaged 1 image/orbit Schedule generated 1-2 weeks ahead of time Commands uploaded daily (weekdays only) Using most recent predicted ISS attitudes & ephemerides Updated 3x/week Include time and pointing angle No real-time commanding

Scheduling Constraints Images from: http://suzymchale.com/ruspace/issnav.html Timing Target request to image collect Min: ~2 weeks Max: Depends on orbit, target priorities, etc Image take to data release ~4-7 days ISS orientation +XVV (flying forward) -XVV (flying backward) Revisit time Depends on latitude, drag, orbit adjustments, lighting, etc Not Sun-synchronous, polar orbit Solar Beta angle Measured from orbital plane to Sun vector High angle precludes HICO from taking imagery for lengthy period of time

Mr. Murphy What happened to my data? 1. No image ISS activities: command not sent (~14%) Computer lockup/motor pos error: image not taken (~21%) Frequent soft reboots Requestor will be notified 2. Image file exists, but looks funny Image is missing data packets If downlink was interrupted, retransmit to retrieve full image Solar panels got in the way Usually only happens during low sun angle periods (<1%) Clouds Pointing/wander issues Requestor will receive data files Tokyo Bay, Feb 3, 2011 Broad Bay, NZ Feb 10, 2011

Pointing Ability: Part 1 Not related to geo-correction By the time the imagery is taken attitude and position predictions are hours to days old Attitude predictions are for the mean Torque Equilibrium Attitude (TEA) Actual mean predicted mean in roll, pitch, and yaw are ~ 0.1 Oscillations about TEA of about ±0.3 about each axis Position predictions (updated 3x/week) Accuracy affected by atmospheric drag (LEO), ISS maneuvers and solar activity Typically the targeted location is near the center of the image Monday, 2011 Jan 24 images: almost missed the targeted point (in the along track direction) due to 2 ISS maneuvers between predicted ephemeris release and image times Different clocks on the ISS slightly affect the positioning of the target within an image Pixel size and scene boundaries are also affected by off-nadir pointing angle and altitude of the ISS (periodically re-boosted) Take home message: repeated images of the same location will not have the same spatial boundaries and this is principally due to the accuracy of the ISS orbital ephemeris prediction.

Pointing Ability: Part 2 Examples of variations in scene boundaries: Tokyo Bay 2011 Jan 08 Saturday Alt: 352 km VZA: 2.3 2011 Jan 04 Tuesday Alt: 352 km VZA: 22 2010 Nov 09 Tuesday Alt: 357 km VZA: 6.1 2010 Nov 05 Friday Alt: 357 km VZA: 19 2010 Sep 09 Thursday Alt: 353 km VZA: 15 2010 Sep 05 Sunday Alt: 355 km VZA: 41 2010 May 30 Sunday Alt: 343 km VZA: 12

Summary What we need 1. Target coordinates and name, if new site 2. Timeframe of requested observations (ex. March 15 April 15), if applicable What we will do 1. Enter new targets in STK model 2. Schedule imaging opportunities and notify requestor 3. Send data files or notify requestor if image was not taken