The Yale/ODI Survey(s)

Similar documents
SkyMapper and the Southern Sky Survey

JINA Observations, Now and in the Near Future

for Astrometry in the 21st Century William van Altena

Halo Tidal Star Streams with DECAM. Brian Yanny Fermilab. DECam Community Workshop NOAO Tucson Aug

Synergies between and E-ELT

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

Galaxies. The majority of known galaxies fall into one of three major classes: spirals (78 %), ellipticals (18 %) and irregulars (4 %).

The Structural Properties of Milky Way Dwarf Galaxies. Ricardo Muñoz (Universidad de Chile) Collaborators:

(Present and) Future Surveys for Metal-Poor Stars

Galaxy classification

ASTRON 449: Stellar (Galactic) Dynamics. Fall 2014

Science Results Enabled by SDSS Astrometric Observations

THE QUEST RR LYRAE SURVEY AND HALO SUB-STRUCTURE

Potential Synergies Between MSE and the ELTs A Purely TMT-centric perspective But generally applicable to ALL ELTs

Part two of a year-long introduction to astrophysics:

Mario Juric Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton

SDSS-IV MaStar: a Large, Comprehensive, and High Quality Empirical Stellar Library

SkyMapper and the Southern Sky Survey

Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

LSST Science. Željko Ivezić, LSST Project Scientist University of Washington

Milky Way S&G Ch 2. Milky Way in near 1 IR H-W Rixhttp://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/galarcheo-c15/rix/

Microlensing (planet detection): theory and applications

The Milky Way Galaxy (ch. 23)

Present and Future Large Optical Transient Surveys. Supernovae Rates and Expectations

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Chapter 14 The Milky Way Galaxy

MASS FUNCTION OF STELLAR REMNANTS IN THE MILKY WAY

Star systems like our Milky Way. Galaxies

Radial Velocity Surveys. Matthias Steinmetz (AIP)

Modern Image Processing Techniques in Astronomical Sky Surveys

VISTA HEMISPHERE SURVEY DATA RELEASE 1

The Milky Way Galaxy. sun. Examples of three Milky-Way like Galaxies

Local Volume, Milky Way, Stars, Planets, Solar System: L3 Requirements

How to Understand Stars Chapter 17 How do stars differ? Is the Sun typical? Location in space. Gaia. How parallax relates to distance

Radio-optical outliers a case study with ICRF2 and SDSS

Low Surface Brightness Observations of Galaxy Disk Truncation with Different Obliquities

The Milky Way & Galaxies

The Milky Way Galaxy is Heading for a Major Cosmic Collision

The Geometry of Sagittarius Stream from PS1 3π RR Lyrae

Relativity and Astrophysics Lecture 15 Terry Herter. RR Lyrae Variables Cepheids Variables Period-Luminosity Relation. A Stellar Properties 2

Pan-Planets. A Search for Transiting Planets Around Cool stars. J. Koppenhoefer, Th. Henning and the Pan-PlanetS Team

Public ESO

The Brown Dwarfs of our Milky Way

Imaging with SPIRIT Exposure Guide

The Milky Way Galaxy. Sun you are here. This is what our Galaxy would look like if we were looking at it from another galaxy.

Lecture 16 The Measuring the Stars 3/26/2018

Deep Drilling Program. Lynne Jones LSST Performance Scien2st. LSST All Hands Mee6ng August 13-17, 2012

Classical Interferometric Arrays. Andreas Quirrenbach Landessternwarte Heidelberg

VLASS Project Memo 2 Requirements for a VLASS pilot survey and a proposal for the pilot survey definition

Figure 69.01a. Formation of Stars

Rømer Science Mission Plan

Data Reduction with NIRI. Knut Olsen and Andrew Stephens Gemini Data Workshop Tucson, AZ July 21, 2010

The Milky Way, Hubble Law, the expansion of the Universe and Dark Matter Chapter 14 and 15 The Milky Way Galaxy and the two Magellanic Clouds.

LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 25. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

SDSS-IV and eboss Science. Hyunmi Song (KIAS)

LSST. Pierre Antilogus LPNHE-IN2P3, Paris. ESO in the 2020s January 19-22, LSST ESO in the 2020 s 1

The J-PAS survey: pushing the limits of spectro-photometry

PoS(INTEGRAL 2012)089

Ground Based Gravitational Microlensing Searches for Extra-Solar Terrestrial Planets Sun Hong Rhie & David Bennett (University of Notre Dame)

Are most galaxies in the Universe TSTS:Too shy to shine?

Quantifying the Assembly History of Elliptical Galaxies

The Milky Way. Mass of the Galaxy, Part 2. Mass of the Galaxy, Part 1. Phys1403 Stars and Galaxies Instructor: Dr. Goderya

High Redshift Universe

WEAVE Galactic Surveys

Cosmic acceleration. Questions: What is causing cosmic acceleration? Vacuum energy (Λ) or something else? Dark Energy (DE) or Modification of GR (MG)?

The Dark Energy Survey Public Data Release 1

Simulations of the Gaia final catalogue: expectation of the distance estimation

Milky Way Satellite Galaxies with DES

Number of Stars: 100 billion (10 11 ) Mass : 5 x Solar masses. Size of Disk: 100,000 Light Years (30 kpc)

Feeding the Beast. Chris Impey (University of Arizona)

LCO Global Telescope Network: Operations and policies for a time-domain facility. Todd Boroson

GALAXIES. Hello Mission Team members. Today our mission is to learn about galaxies.

Prospects for Extragalactic HI Line Studies with Large Single Dishes

The Galaxy. (The Milky Way Galaxy)

Igor Soszyński. Warsaw University Astronomical Observatory

5 February 2004 MEMORANDUM. To: Dan Fabricant From: Scott Kenyon Subject: Time Allocation at FLWO and the MMT

The Evolution of Massive Galaxies at 3 < z < 7 (The Hawaii 20 deg 2 Survey H2O)

Observing the Formation of Dense Stellar Nuclei at Low and High Redshift (?) Roderik Overzier Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics

Age-redshift relation. The time since the big bang depends on the cosmological parameters.

Astrometry in Gaia DR1

D4.2. First release of on-line science-oriented tutorials

The Milky Way Galaxy. Some thoughts. How big is it? What does it look like? How did it end up this way? What is it made up of?

ASTR 200 : Lecture 22 Structure of our Galaxy

The gas-galaxy-halo connection

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 3 Aug 2004

The Gravitational Microlensing Planet Search Technique from Space

Taking the census of the Milky Way Galaxy. Gerry Gilmore Professor of Experimental Philosophy Institute of Astronomy Cambridge

Dark Matter Halos of M31. Joe Wolf


Structure of the Milky Way. Structure of the Milky Way. The Milky Way

Galaxies and Hubble s Law

The Milky Way. Finding the Center. Milky Way Composite Photo. Finding the Center. Milky Way : A band of and a. Milky Way

Surface Brightness of Spiral Galaxies

Keck laser guide star: Science case

Open Cluster Research Project

Bringing Real-time Astronomical Observations into the Classroom

WFIRST and JWST synergies in the study of First Light. M. Stiavelli STScI, Baltimore

Chapter 15 The Milky Way Galaxy. The Milky Way

Transiting Hot Jupiters near the Galactic Center

Transcription:

The Yale/ODI Survey(s) High-level goals & parameters of survey Science cases (more in specific area talks) Management structure, kinds of survey project Goals of this meeting Strawman observing strategy

The Yale/ODI Survey(s) 150 nights (50/yr) likely to be allocated by Yale to the survey Extensions and add-ons will likely propose for additional time Goals: Provide basis for scientific projects by Yale and non- Yale PIs Take advantage of excellent image quality Exploit time domain from individual images and create deep summed images Leverage data from current/past surveys; serve as precursor for future surveys Survey definition currently underway observing plan to be fixed shortly after this workshop Community participation welcome!

Image Quality OPTIC and QUOTA observations suggest median i-band seeing ~0.45 Pixel scale 0.11 M 76 1. 3

Image Quality OPTIC and QUOTA observations suggest median i-band seeing ~0.45 Pixel scale 0.11 3 hr U-I-Y exposure with 0.4 seeing

Area vs. Image Quality Entendue is good, but not unique (Dark Energy Camera 4 times greater) WIYN/ODI image quality excellent (modern telescope, orthogonal transfer, small pixels) Unique science in situations where image quality is critical wide-area coverage less compelling

Science Primary science goals focus on high image quality and time domain: Image quality projects: High-z galaxy morphology galaxy-cluster; galaxy-galaxy lensing faint galactic/local group photometry astrometry (see time domain) Time domain projects (variability, not transients): identification and period of pulsators identification and period of binaries non-periodic variables: AGN, CVs and flare stars astrometry (see image quality)

High-z Galaxy Morphology Group Leaders: Pieter van Dokkum, Nikhil Padmanabhan Key: many galaxies have sizes comparable to ~0.5 Morphology measurements possible for much wider range of targets sizes structure (disk vs bulge) surface brightness profiles

Gravitational Lensing Group Leaders: Ian Dell Antonio, Nikhil Padmanabhan Good image quality leads to more measurable galaxy shapes per area Key for galaxy-cluster and galaxy-galaxy lensing

Galactic/Local Group Photometry Group Leader: Marla Geha 12 new dwarf galaxies discovered near Milky Way since 2005 through stellar overdensities in SDSS Given incompleteness, may be as many as 400 more (Tollerud et al. 2008) Background galaxy contamination increases dramatically at r>23 Galaxy/star separation will be key to future progress Sloan Digital Sky Survey MW Dwarfs (SDSS) pre- MW Dwarfs 2005 post- 2005

Astrometry Group Leader: Bill van Altena, Terry Girard Proper motions (with existing 1 st epoch, or as 1 st epoch for future work) Galactic streams (Sgr, Mon) Main Milky Way components (thin disk, thick disk, halo) Specific targets (dwarf galaxies, clusters) Parallax Volume sampled scales as cube of parallax precision Parallax accuracy should be +/- 0.6 mas for a star I<22 Stellar density within 150 pc to 1.5% Key input into determinations of Dark Matter in solar neighborhood Freeman 2007, Dinescu et al. 1999

Management Structure PI (Charles Bailyn) in charge of overall survey activities and policies Project Scientist (Terry Girard) day-to-day survey operations and coordination with Tucson-based WIYN and queue staff Science Council: PI, PS and Area Leaders approve survey projects and participants Area Leaders coordinate projects within a given science domain, and convey needs/concerns to PI, PS and operations team Extragalactic science (N. Padmanabhan & P. van Dokkum) Lensing science (I. Dell Antonio) Galactic science (M. Geha) Time domain photometry (C. Bailyn) Astrometry (W. van Altena, T. Girard) H alpha? Solar System? Projects leaders coordinate and execute specific science projects

Kinds of programs Primary science projects Use data from the survey itself. Can be led by community members, must be approved by SC Programs for poor conditions Bottom quartile seeing and/or significant extinction Survey extensions Additional time acquired from any of WIYN partners to extend the survey (deeper, wider, longer, different cadence etc). Data considered part of the survey, science projects organized similarly to primary science projects Survey add-ons Stand-alone projects allocated time by any of the WIYN partners, executed as part of the survey queue, PI retains data rights

Goals of this Meeting Obtain input for observing strategy Begin forming science teams (all catagories of observing projects) Identify promising extensions, add-ons and poor conditions programs Explore operational issues (data handling and queue operations)

Plan for the Meeting Introduction and status of ODI and the survey Science area talks, highlighting opportunities and unresolved questions Related efforts elsewhere Breakout sessions Contributed talks Continue breakout sessions Breakout reports and discussion

Breakout Sessions Late today + late morning tomorrow Extra-galactic (Nikhil Padmanabhan) Galactic (Marla Geha) Time Domain variability, astrometry, solar system (Terry Girard) Data handling Friday only (Pierre Martin) Halpha projects Saturday only (Jeff Kenney) Goals List of uses of primary survey data ONE modification to the current strawman plan, with justification list of survey extensions and add-ons (ideally prioritized) uses for non-optimum observing conditions

Strawman Observing Strategy Available Observing Time 150 nights (fixed!!) = 750 hours top 3 quartiles of conditions + 250 hours of bottom quartile conditions Fields and Depth 3 fields of 12 sq degrees each, RA = ~2, ~8, ~14 7 hours top quartile observing + 14 hrs median observing per field Precise location TBD Filters griz or ugriz, approximately equal exposure time most i-band imaging in top quartile observing (0.4 deep images) Cadence 2 minute exposures, at least 3/filter/visit (often more) ~30 visits per field, 26 in one year, 2 each in other years Logarithmic time spacing during intense year

Post-Meeting Activities Fix observing strategy Organize science teams (expression of interest forms) Plan for extensions, add-ons and poor seeing programs Continue work on operations (data handling, queue observing)