Disegno Sperimentale (DoE) come strumento per QbD

Similar documents
International Journal of PharmTech Research CODEN (USA): IJPRIF, ISSN: , ISSN(Online): Vol.9, No.7, pp , 2016

Quality by Design and Analytical Methods

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Practical Statistics for the Analytical Scientist Table of Contents

8 RESPONSE SURFACE DESIGNS

Experimental designs for multiple responses with different models

Chemometrics Unit 4 Response Surface Methodology

RESPONSE SURFACE MODELLING, RSM

7. Response Surface Methodology (Ch.10. Regression Modeling Ch. 11. Response Surface Methodology)

Experimental Design and Optimization

Application of mathematical, statistical, graphical or symbolic methods to maximize chemical information.

Response Surface Methodology

6th International Doctoral Student Workshop on Logistics

How to Plan Experiments

Response Surface Methodology:

Appendix IV Experimental Design

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE

Response Surface Methodology IV

REVIEW OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. 4.1 Introduction. Experimentation plays an important role in new product design, manufacturing

ASEAN GUIDELINES FOR VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Benefits of Applying QbD Concepts to Analytical Methods for Therapeutic Proteins Case Studies

FUSION METHOD DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE

Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd Edition

Experimental design. Matti Hotokka Department of Physical Chemistry Åbo Akademi University

Method Validation Characteristics through Statistical Analysis Approaches. Jane Weitzel

The Theory of HPLC. Quantitative and Qualitative HPLC

Agile Mind Mathematics 8 Scope and Sequence, Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Mathematics

MultiscaleMaterialsDesignUsingInformatics. S. R. Kalidindi, A. Agrawal, A. Choudhary, V. Sundararaghavan AFOSR-FA

Application Note. The Optimization of Injection Molding Processes Using Design of Experiments

Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments

2 Introduction to Response Surface Methodology

Use of Bayesian multivariate prediction models to optimize chromatographic methods

Objective Experiments Glossary of Statistical Terms

Process Simulation, Parameter Uncertainty, and Risk

Analytical Methods Validation

CBE495 LECTURE IV MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL

SIX SIGMA IMPROVE

Sequenced Units for Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards MA35 Personal Finance Year at a Glance

Work plan & Methodology: HPLC Method Development

Statistics Toolbox 6. Apply statistical algorithms and probability models

CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology

OA03 UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN CHEMICAL TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SIST EN ISO/IEC Table of contents

A Quality by Design (QbD) Based Method Development for the Determination of Impurities in a Peroxide Degraded Sample of Ziprasidone

CURRICULUM CATALOG. Algebra II (3135) VA

VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS. Presented by Dr. A. Suneetha Dept. of Pharm. Analysis Hindu College of Pharmacy

Advanced analysis and modelling tools for spatial environmental data. Case study: indoor radon data in Switzerland

4. Objectives of Research work

Cost optimisation by using DoE

A Quality-by-Design Methodology for Rapid HPLC Column and Solvent Selection

Chapter 4: Verification of compendial methods

Validated HPLC Methods

14.0 RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY (RSM)

Pharmaceutical Experimental Design and Interpretation

Fusion QbD and the Perfect Storm of Technologies Driving QbDaligned LC Method Development

5.1 Transition Probability Matrices

Accelerated Life Test of Mechanical Components Under Corrosive Condition

Response Surface Methodology

Seymour Public Schools Curriculum

Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology

Master of Science in Statistics A Proposal

Using Design of Experiments to Optimize Chiral Separation

Machine Learning Overview

Sizing Mixture (RSM) Designs for Adequate Precision via Fraction of Design Space (FDS)

Process Characterization Using Response Surface Methodology

Rosemary extract liquid

OPTIMAL DESIGN INPUTS FOR EXPERIMENTAL CHAPTER 17. Organization of chapter in ISSO. Background. Linear models

Observations Homework Checkpoint quizzes Chapter assessments (Possibly Projects) Blocks of Algebra

New Methodology for the Development of Chromatographic Methods

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT ERT 427 Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Miss Hanna Ilyani Zulhaimi

Midterm. Introduction to Machine Learning. CS 189 Spring Please do not open the exam before you are instructed to do so.

Determination of Design Space for Oral Pharmaceutical Drugs

Low Bias Bagged Support Vector Machines

Optimization of Muffler and Silencer

A033 PRACTICAL METHODS FOR UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT

Paint runs through our veins.

Limit of Detection and Its Establishment in Analytical Chemistry

Modelling Under Risk and Uncertainty

The integration of response surface method in microsoft excel with visual basic application

Robust Pareto Design of GMDH-type Neural Networks for Systems with Probabilistic Uncertainties

DATA ANALYTICS IN NANOMATERIALS DISCOVERY

Provläsningsexemplar / Preview INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO Second edition

High-throughput Agrochemical Formulation: Easing the Route to Commercial Manufacture

Traceability, validation and measurement uncertainty 3 pillars for quality of measurement results. David MILDE

M.Sc FINAL YEAR (CDE) ASSIGNMENT SUBJECT : STATISTICS Paper-I : STATISTICAL INFERENCE

Evaluating the value of structural heath monitoring with longitudinal performance indicators and hazard functions using Bayesian dynamic predictions

ENHANCING SOLID-PHASE DISK EXTRACTION PERFORMANCE WITH DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS

STA 4273H: Statistical Machine Learning

New Dynamic MRM Mode Improves Data Quality and Triple Quad Quantification in Complex Analyses

Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists

Bayesian Reliability Analysis: Statistical Challenges from Science-Based Stockpile Stewardship

Software Sleuth Solves Engineering Problems

CHAPTER 3 : A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO DECISION MAKING

Hardware/Software Design Methodologies Introduction to DoE and Course Projects

Linkage Methods for Environment and Health Analysis General Guidelines

Theory of Screening Procedures to Identify Robust Product Designs Using Fractional Factorial Experiments

Multivariate calibration

Statistical methods and data analysis

PACKAGE LMest FOR LATENT MARKOV ANALYSIS

Transcription:

Giornata di Studio Disegno Sperimentale (DoE) come strumento per QbD Università degli Studi di Milano Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche Milano, 22 aprile 2013 Dr. Lorenza Broccardo

Introduction Nowadays, product quality cannot be tested into the finished product but it must be designed and built into a product and its manufacturing process The International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use provides a guide for pharmaceuticals process developers that introduce the QbD concept: Quality by Design is systematic approach to development that begins with predefined objectives and emphasizes product and process understanding and process control, based on sound science and quality risk management --ICH Q8 (R), Step 2

Tools to achieve QbD: Design by Experiments (DoE) Risk Assessment Multivariate data Analysis (MVA) Design of Experiments (DOE) is an statistical methodology useful to plan a set of experiments in order to obtain the maximum amount of information with the minimum amount of experiments

About DoE Which applications? process products When is it useful? development (new process-new product) optimisation (process/product-performance) minimization (cost-discard-pollution) robustness testing (method-instrument) selection of influencing variables understand the relation between responses and variables define the set point define the design space

Examples pharmaceutical problems well handled by DoE define factors influencing a reaction yield optimization of a chromatographic separation optimization of a mixture (mixture: blend which components cannot be manipulated independently of one another) production of active substance as powder: define the design space, that is, the experimental conditions assuring a production inside specifications

Definitions Factors independent variables, X, controlled by the experimenter Range [X min ; X max ] Experimental domain the numbers of factors and their ranges of variability define the experimental domain Responses dependent variables, Y, measured Objective The experimentation purpose: screening (preliminary information) optimization (detailed information) robustness testing (evaluate the process robustness)

Why an experimental planning? To obtain new information about the system, the experimenter causes a controlled variation of factors and measure the corresponding modification of the responses information are located in the factors setting (X matrices): a careful planning of experiments increases the amount of information an appropriate experiments planning allow to connect matrix X and Y by a mathematical equation (model) which enable prediction X MODEL Y factors responses

Classical vs DOE approach Classical 1. incomplete sampling of the X space 2. gives different implications with different starting points 3. no quantification of interactions 4. does not lead to the real optimum 5. leads to many experiments and poor information 6. what about: X=3 and Y=2? 10 X8 2 6 4 2 0-2 10 11 12 13 14 15 X 1 DOE 1. homogeneous sampling of the X space 2. result independent from the starting point 3. quantification of interactions 4. experimental results are interpreted by a regression model - system description by a surface - predictive power - information about the real optimum 5. requires few experiments to obtain al lot of information 6. handles complex systems X 2 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 X 1

DoE make use of design Design: organized distribution of experiments within the experimental domain Full Factorial Composit Box-Behnken x 1 =1 Doehlert x 2 =1 x 3 =1 Simplex

The design generates the worksheet

Experiments are analyze and interpret by a model The model is a mathematical relation between X (set) and Y (measured) ƒ(x) = b 0 + b 1 x + b 2 x 2 + b n x n + e Three main types of polynomial models linear: y = b 0 + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 +...+ e interaction: y = b 0 + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 12 x 1 x 2 +...+ e quadratic: y = b 0 + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 + b 11 x 2 1 + b 22 x 2 2 + b 12 x 1 x 2 +...+ The model graphical representation It is a m dimensional surface representing Y as a function of all X i (m = i X i + 1) Y = f (X i ) It is used for Y prediction 11

Objectives, Design and Model are linked objective design model response surface 2 factors 3 factors > 3 Screening (factors<4) Hyper cube Linear Interactions Screening (factors>4) Rob. testing Balanced fraction of hyper cube Linear Optimization Hyper cube + axial points Quadratic 12

QbD steps that achieve benefit from DoE application Identification of influencing input process parameters Early stage of system study (screening) Find out which factors are the dominating ones Many factors are investigated in few runs List of supposed influencing factors is proposed on the bases of: previous knowledge on the system fishbone (cause-and-effect) diagram risk assessment (FMEA) Factors effect is tested by a screening design outcome:

Definition of appropriate experimental domain Early stage of system study (screening) Find out which factors ranges include the experimental condition corresponding to the required response(s) value Many factors are investigated in few runs X 2 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 X 101112131415 1

Sul Mof Temp Sul*Sul Mof*Mof Temp*Temp Sul*Mof Sul*Temp Mof*Temp % Define the set point conditions As a result of the screening phase, the most important factors and their appropriate range of variability have been defined Optimization: understand the relation between each factor and each response (linear, interaction, quadratic) plot the responses predicted value by the polynomial models predict the best set point conditions Few factors are investigated in many runs Scaled & Centered Coefficients for Yield 20 10 0-10

Robustness testing It is usually carried out before the release of a product or an analytical method as a latest test to assure quality. The objective is to verify the process stability and define the design space Responses specifications must be defined Set point Factor combination which is currently used for running the process Experimental domain small shift around the set point Design Linear (many factors are investigated in few runs) Outcome the process is robust: release the set point factor combination and the factors variability ranges that assure quality the process is not robust: identify factors responsible for the process high sensitivity and define how to reduce their impact

PlateN Nature of robustness Are responses inside or outside specifications? Is regression model significant or not? Four limiting cases 1) Inside specification/significant model all the measured values are inside the specification regression model significant apply the model to predict maximum variation the process is robust 2) Inside specification/non-significant model ideal outcome changes in parameters correspond to the experimental error the process is robust 1 6000 2 3 Target 5000 4000 Min 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 7 Replicate Index 8 9 10 11 12

AcN# ph# Temp# OSA# Col(A) Col(B) k2 3) Outside specification/significant model discover which factors causes the outside of specification apply the model to understand how factors ranges should be varied to achieve robustness the process is not robust 3,5 3,0 2,5 1 Max Target 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6 7 8 910 11 12 0,10-0,00-0,10-0,20-0,30 Scaled & Centered Coefficients for k2 Replicate Index

vetific vetific 4) Outside specification/non-significant model Most complex limiting case... replicated center-points have much higher response values (left) o might be possible to resolve by shrinking the design o at minimum an additional design one strong outlier (right) o risk for a process that is unstable and then gives strange results o cause of problem needs to be found and a new design performed Investigation: itdoe_roblimcases Investigation: itdoe_roblimcases Investigation: itdoe_roblimcases Plot of Replications for vetific with Experiment Number labels 2 3 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Replicate Index 5 6 7 8 910 11 70 60 50 Plot of Replications for vetific with Experiment Number labels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Replicate Index 910 11 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Plot of Replications for vetific with Experiment Number labels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Replicate Index MOD DE 7-2003-11-17 11:58:00 MODDE 7-2003-11-17 11:59:51 MODDE 7-2003-11-17 12:01:59

Design Space The Design Space correspond to the experimental domain centered on the set point and including only experimental conditions that assure quality according with defined standard (y) and the accepted level of risk of failure (DPMO) To define the Design Space, a robustness test is required The design space is calculated on the bases of: regression model model error Monte Carlo simulation responses specifications DPMO (Defect Per Million Opportunities) level accepted Outcome: experimental domain (design space) assuring that all responses are inside specifications according to the accepted level of failure

Monte Carlo simulation The Monte Carlo simulations are: random factor settings according to the selected distribution around their optimum value but within the Low and High limits followed by predictions of the responses 1.000.000 predictions are performed DPMO (Defect Per Million Opportunities) shows how many response predictions are outside the response specifications based on one million simulations Indicates the sensitivity of the responses to the external perturbation applied to the factors settings Ideal outcome: DMPO = 0

Design Space outcome Identify critical factors (AcN, OSA) and define new range of variability Identify critical responses (k2) Verify that the new factors range assure robustness

Design space outcome Probability contour plot

Conclusion DoE is a tool to achieve QbD is an organized methodology useful to plan a set of experiments efficiently provides tools to analyze the data and make decision makes available a deep understanding of the process allows to save time and money

Acknowledgements Scientific committee Organizing committee All attendees