State of Shimane Nuclear Power Station

Similar documents
Study on Quantification Methodology of accident sequences for Tsunami Induced by Seismic Events.

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SITE SELECTION

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations in NPPs, NS-G-3.6

OHIO S NEW CLASS II REGULATIONS AND ITS PROACTIVE APPROACH TO SEISMIC MONITORING AND INDUCED SEISMICITY

4-3-1 Earthquake and Tsunami Countermeasures of Tokyo s

Results of Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT in the Chugoku Region

Guidelines for Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Reports for Essential and Hazardous Facilities and Major and Special-Occupancy Structures in Oregon

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

The effects of the Kumamoto earthquakes on Sendai Nuclear Power Station. The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan

Special edition paper

COMPARE OF THE EMPIRICAL AND NUMERICAL TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT RESULTS FOR THE EAST COAST OF KOREA. Min Kyu Kim 1, In-kil Choi 2

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

Outline of Guideline for Development and Utilization of Tsunami Disaster Management Map

Interpretive Map Series 24

Seismic Hazard Abatement Program

TEPCO s Activities on the Investigation into Unsolved Issues in the Fukushima Daiichi NPS Accident

IAMGOLD ANNOUNCES RESULTS FROM THE WESTWOOD-MOOSHLA EXPLORATION PROJECT

Section 19.1: Forces Within Earth Section 19.2: Seismic Waves and Earth s Interior Section 19.3: Measuring and Locating.

Disaster and Science. Post-Tohoku research actions in France. March 6, 2013

V Sample from C.O.D vein 15 metres southwest of V

Section Forces Within Earth. 8 th Grade Earth & Space Science - Class Notes

IG-WRDRR, UNESCAP, UNESCO-IOC, WMO. Yukio Tamura Chairman, International. Group. Tuesday 10 May, , Room 13. for Disaster. Risk.

Tectonic Hazard Evaluations for Korean Nuclear Sites

Revision of the AESJ Standard for Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment (2) Seismic Hazard Evaluation

DETERMINATION OF SUBSURFACE STRUCTURE OF IZUMO PLAIN, SOUTHWEST JAPAN USING MICROTREMORS AND GRAVITY ANOMALIES

JICA s Experiences of Connecting Japanese Science & Technologies for Disaster Risk Reduction in Developing Countries

Usually, only a couple of centuries of earthquake data is available, much shorter than the complete seismic cycle for most plate motions.

Storing, using and disposing of unsealed radioactive substances in a Type C Laboratory: Extract of regulatory requirements

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 5-1. Risk Assessment and Hazard Mapping. CLUSTER 5: Hazard and Risk Information and Decision Making. Public Disclosure Authorized

COMMANDER RESOURCES LTD SOUTH VOISEY S BAY NI-CU-CO PROJECT LABRADOR

Commentary Appendix A DEVELOPMENT OF MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION MAPS FIGURES THROUGH

Damage Estimation of the Road Bridge Structure Using the Seismic Hazard map for BCM in Hokkaido, Japan

Elastic Rebound Theory

Mechanism of tsunami generation,propagation and runup -sharing experiences with Japanese

Special edition paper Development of Shinkansen Earthquake Impact Assessment System

68. Izu-Torishima. Summary. Latitude: 30 29'02" N, Longitude: '11" E, Elevation: 394 m (Ioyama) (Elevation Point) (68.

Word Cards. 2 map. 1 geographic representation. a description or portrayal of the Earth or parts of the Earth. a visual representation of an area

Assay Results Highlights (as of November 16, 2017) representing approximately 4,500 metres ( m ) of drilling:

89. Wakamiko. Summary. Latitude: ' N, Longitude: ' E, Depth: -77 m (Central cone) (89. Wakamiko)

Junior Uranium explorer in the Athabasca Basin. Patterson Claims

Yev Kontar. Illinois State Geological Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Uniform Hazard Spectrum(UHS) for performance based seismic design

Sabin Zn-Cu VMS Project. Sturgeon Lake Belt, Ontario

Earthquake,Tsunami,Volcano Monitoring & Warning System in Korea. Jimin Lee Earthquake & Volcano Monitoring Division KMA

at IHO IRCC7 Mexico City, Mexico, June 2015

AP1000 European 15. Accident Analyses Design Control Document

NUCLEAR SAFETY AND RELIABILITY WEEK 3

COMMENT CARD RESPONSES (SEISMIC)

PSA on Extreme Weather Phenomena for NPP Paks

Seismic Hazards in Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations

SCEK Report on Phase I ( ) Induced Seismicity Monitoring Project (ISMP) Carlos Salas, VP Oil & Gas, Geoscience BC

SCIENCE DISCOVERY GROWTH. Investor Presentation. Miga Arc Western Victoria s newly emerging copper belt

Development of Multi-Unit Dependency Evaluation Model Using Markov Process and Monte Carlo Method

Outage Coordination and Business Practices

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

Earthquakes.

Atico Mining Provides Exploration Update

Estimation of Deep Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles in Lima, Peru, Using Seismometers Arrays

Earthquake Source. Kazuki Koketsu. Special Session: Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake. Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo

Damage of Sewage Plant by Tsunami

Effect of Correlations of Component Failures and Cross-connections of EDGs on Seismically Induced Core Damage of a Multi-unit Site

Flood Management in Japan

Tsunami fragility assessment framework for probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants


Washington State K 12 Facilities Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program Final Mitigation Plan

Chemical Control Legislation In Japan

COMMANDER RESOURCES LTD.

CCR Surface Impoundment Location Restrictions Demonstration. MidAmerican Energy Company, Louisa Generating Station

Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code

2.3 Notes: Earthquake Damage Can Be Reduced

Latitude: 34 31'13" N, Longitude: '45" E, Elevation: 508 m (Miyatsukayama) (Triangulation Point - Toshima)

Field Investigation and Dynamic Analysis of Damaged Structure on Pile Foundation during the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Thermal Calculation for Linear Regulator

Correlation between neutrons detected outside the reactor building and fuel melting

NEWS RELEASE ORCA GOLD REPORTS CONTINUED SUCCESS AT GSS

19. Esan Continuously Monitored by JMA

POLICY ISSUE (INFORMATION)

Finding an Earthquake Epicenter Pearson Education, Inc.

Detection of Xe135 at Nuclear Reactor of Unit 2, Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. November 4, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Reliability of Technical Systems

Overview of Control System Design

NGIAs' roles in successful disaster response

Improvements in research knowledge: a challenge for engineering

Earthquakes Science & Safety. Dr. Richard Robertson Geologist & Head Seismic Research Unit

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 Primary Containment Vessel Internal Investigation

Geophysics the use of geology, laboratory & field experiments, mathematics, and instruments to study: Earthquakes and Volcanoes seismometers,

9. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERALS

- Information before strong ground motion -

Orsu Metals completes Phase 2 drilling program and announces significant intercepts in drillhole SDH17-15 at Zone 23, Sergeevskoe Gold Project, Russia

Earthquakes in Canada

Genpatsu-Shinsai: Catastrophic Multiple Disaster of Earthquake and Quake-induced Nuclear Accident Anticipated in the Japanese Islands

Earthquakes Science & Safety. Ms Joan L. Latchman Seismologist Seismic Research Unit

IEC Tritium Standard

Challenge to the tunnel construction that supports national resilience

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

Making the Original Earthquake Early Warning System including epicentral earthquake

Simplified Method for Mechanical Analysis of Safety Class 1 Piping

Establishment and Operation of a Regional Tsunami Warning Centre

RISKY HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS RESONATING WITH THE LONG-PERIOD STRONG GROUND MOTIONS IN THE OSAKA BASIN, JAPAN

NEWS RELEASE. Mountain Province Diamonds Completes the Kennady North Winter Exploration Program

Transcription:

Investors Meeting for FY2014-2Q Financial Results State of Shimane Nuclear Power Station November 11, 2013 The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc.

1. Basic approach of the new regulatory standards 1 Under the new regulatory standards for nuclear power, measures are drastically strengthened Standards for not allowing accidents to happen are strengthened Measures to deal with earthquakes, tsunamis, natural phenomena, fire, interior inundation Measures based on the premise that Accidents could happen New provision of measures to deal with serious accidents (severe accident countermeasures) Previously: voluntary safety measures by utilities Standards premised on Accidents could happen Standards for not allowing accidents to happen *: Nuclear Damage Compensation Facilitation Corporation Act Prevention measures for Nuclear accidents Measures for serious accidents (severe accident countermeasures) Core damage not envisaged Single failures alone envisaged Measures for earthquakes & tsunamis Measures for power sources Measures for natural disasters Measures for fire Measures for other facilities New provision & strengthening New provision & strengthening Structures relating to nuclear power accident prevention strengthened Measures for serious accidents (severe accident countermeasures) Measures to prevent pronounced damage to cores Measures to prevent damage to containment vessels, and to prevent dispersion of radioactive materials Design standards strengthened and newly provided Measures for earthquakes & tsunamis Measures for power sources Measures for natural disasters (some newly provided) Measures for fire Measures for interior inundation (newly provided) Measures for other facilities New regulatory standards

2. State of responses to new regulatory standards 2 At Shimane Nuclear Power Station, emergency safety measures for tsunamis, etc., have been completed. For Shimane Units 2 and 3, construction work, and documents for applications to the government, are under preparation in response to the new regulatory standards. For Shimane Unit 1, responses to the new regulatory standards, including the 40-years operation regulation, are under deliberation. Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Years of operation as of Nov. 2013 39 24 Under construction Emergency safety measures Responses to new regulatory standards Response measure construction (common for Units 1-3) Breakwaters constructed (along entire seaward periphery) Waterproofing measures for building exterior walls Report to government on advanced aging countermeasures (necessitating cold shutdown, in Sep. 2013) Other responses, including those to the 40- years operation regulation, under deliberation Completed Substitute water-pouring means assured Power sources assured - such as high-voltage generator trucks Compliance applications under preparation Vent equipment with filters (scheduled for completion during FY2015) Other measures (scheduled for completion within FY2014) Construction work to enhance seismic margins (voluntary measures) Important Equipment Aseismic Building (scheduled for completion within FY2015)

3. Earthquake evaluation Aseismic capabilities 3 No active faults or crush zones have been found within the Shimane Nuclear Power Station site. The former Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency gave the opinion that there is no problem with the clayey weak geological stratum (seam) that is present within the site. It can be clearly negated that there has been any activity in the faults around the power station since about 120,000 to 130,000 years ago. There is no need for assessment of active faults going back to 400,000 years ago. Map of active fault distribution Fk-1 fault 30km Ota Coast fault Eastern Tottori Coast fault Western Tottori Coast fault Yamasaki fault system K-4+ K-6 + K-7 flexures F-III+ F-IV + Fk-2 faults Taisha thrust fault Shimane Nuclear Power Station Shinji fault

Reference Summary of 3-dimensional subsurface structure survey Aseismic capabilities A subsurface structure survey and work to install seismometers are underway, with the objective of enhancing the seismic observation system. (Scheduled for completion within FY2013.) Subsurface structure survey: Boring to depths of over 1,000 m is being carried out. The bore holes will be used to conduct the structure survey. Observation system enhancement: Seismometers will be installed deep below the surface. 4 Schematic of survey Surface (GL 0 m) Bore hole over 1,000 m deep Moves so as to excite vibration at multiple locations Seismometer Vibration-exciting truck Vibration Vibration Vibration Vibration receiver for survey Vibration receiver for survey *1 Seismometer *2 *1: Vibration receiver is moved inside the bore hole so as to receive vibration from the vibration-exciting truck. *2: After the survey is completed, a seismometer will be installed at the bottom of the bore hole and used for seismic observation. Overall view of vibration-exciting truck Excitation unit Vertical vibration

4.Tsunami evaluation Tsunami resistance capabilities A standard tsunami height has been determined (currently under partial evaluation) based on the new regulatory standards. Breakwaters that exceed the standard tsunami height have been installed, and it is currently being verified that even in the event of backwash, the minimum level for water intake will be exceeded in the intake layer. Highest sea levels along facility coast * Units 1 & 2 Unit 3 5 Submarine active fault Japan Sea eastern rim Shimane Nuclear Power Station Normal water level Wadani Bay Japan Sea eastern rim Submarine active fault * The sea levels are the tsunami height with account additionally taken of the ground deformation amount due to fault activity Breakwaters elevation15m Site elevation 8.5 m RSW pump Under assessment EL6.5m Intake chamber Under assessment EL9.2m Reactor building Turbine building

For reference:) Breakwaters Tsunami resistance capabilities 6 The Unit 1&2 area breakwater was completed in September 2013, thereby completing the breakwaters in all the areas. Unit 1&2 area Before the work Unit 2 Unit 1 Breakwaters Unit 3 Completed in January, 2012 Structural diagram After completion

5. Volcano assessment Measures to cope with other natural disasters Currently, the volcanoes that could exert impacts on the power station are being identified, and individual assessment concerning volcanic activity (impacts of volcanic ash, etc.) is being carried out. 7 Volcanoes under examination (Quaternary volcanoes Shimane Nuclear Power Station 160km

(For reference:) Vent Equipment with Filter Measures to deal with serious accidents We are excavating the planned installation sites, aiming to complete installation during FY2014. Construction of equipment for Unit 2 8 Exhaust through the top of the reactor building Reactor building Newly laid piping Exhaust stack Exhaust Approx. 2 m piping Ground surface Reactor containment vessel Approx. 8 m Concrete Bedrock Metal filter Water solution Containment basin ferroconcrete Outline of the vent equipment with filter 1. Main data of the vent equipment with filter unit Units to be installed: 4 units 2. Rough dimensions of the containment basin for the vent equipment with filter units Removal efficiency: 99.9% (particulate radioactive material) Approx. 13 m wide by approx. 25 m long by approx. 12 m high

(For reference: Important Equipment Aseismic Building - Measures to deal with serious accidents 9 We are currently carrying out the work of installing aseismic apparatuses in the building s foundations, aiming to start operation of the facility within FY2015. Panoramic view of construction work Rendering of completed facility Unit 3 Units 1&2 Construction site Mechanism of aseismic structure Aseismic apparatuses are provided between the foundations and the body of the building, to lessen swaying of the building during earthquakes An aseismic apparatus

None of the information on this document is intended to solicit of induce purchase or selling of the Company s stocks. Moreover Chugoku Electric makes no guarantees whatever regarding the contents of this website. Persons considering investment in the Company should without fail read in advance the stock and bond reports and other financial literature issued by the Company, and make decisions on their own judgment. Though great care is exercised in the preparation of such literature, Chugoku Electric and the other information providers shall not be liable in any manner for any loss whatever incurred as a result of erroneous information contained therein or in this document. Items in Chugoku Electric s current plans and strategies, etc., published on this document which are not yet historical fact are projections concerning future performance and as such involve factors of risk and uncertainty which means that actual performance in the future may differ to a large extent from projections published here. Therefore Chugoku Electric does not guarantee the reliability of such projections.

For Questions or Comments, Please Contact the Investor Relations Section at the Address Below 4-33, Komachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima 730-8701 Japan The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc. Corporate Planning Division F A X +81 82 544 2792 E-mail t9504@pnet.energia.co.jp