TOD Priority Tool Executive Summary

Similar documents
The 3V Approach. Transforming the Urban Space through Transit Oriented Development. Gerald Ollivier Transport Cluster Leader World Bank Hub Singapore

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Committee Meeting November 6, 2018

Economic Activity Economic A ctivity

CLAREMONT MASTER PLAN 2017: LAND USE COMMUNITY INPUT

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

CORRIDORS OF FREEDOM Access Management (Ability) Herman Pienaar: Director City Transformation and Spatial Planning

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

New Partners for Smart Growth: Building Safe, Healthy, and Livable Communities Mayor Jay Williams, Youngstown OH

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

Carrying Capacity: A New Model For Mature Cities (UC359 )

Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, Consideration of the City of Vancouver s Regional Context Statement

Council Workshop on Neighbourhoods Thursday, October 4 th, :00 to 4:00 p.m. Burlington Performing Arts Centre

Cultural Data in Planning and Economic Development. Chris Dwyer, RMC Research Sponsor: Rockefeller Foundation

Local Area Key Issues Paper No. 13: Southern Hinterland townships growth opportunities

Introduction and Project Overview

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

Local Economic Activity Around Rapid Transit Stations

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

Density and Walkable Communities

Figure 8.2a Variation of suburban character, transit access and pedestrian accessibility by TAZ label in the study area

CREATING LIVEABLE & SAFE CITIES FOR ALL

CITY OF CEDAR FALLS D O W N T O W N PA R K I N G S T U D Y P U B L I C W O R K S H O P D E C E M B E R 5,

Subject: Note on spatial issues in Urban South Africa From: Alain Bertaud Date: Oct 7, A. Spatial issues

Managing Growth: Integrating Land Use & Transportation Planning

Recovery Renewal Rebuilding

Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit. Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District

Shaping Your Neighbourhood

A GIS TOUR OF DES MOINES PRESENTED BY ANNA WHIPPLE, GIS MANAGER APRIL 20, 2015

Riocan Centre Study Area Frontenac Mall Study Area Kingston Centre Study Area

PlaceTypes. How the built environment is measured. Variables Measures Levels. AREA TYPE + DEVELOPMENT TYPE = PlaceType

The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of Government, Topography and Markets

TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. POLK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VOLUME 1. Page CHAPTER 1. GENERAL... A-1

Integrated Infrastructure Planning & Spatial Mapping

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Growth & Intensification Study Secondary Plan Stakeholder Session June 26th, 2017

[Leveraging & Improving Neighborhood Connections] Area E Cedar Creek

Port Cities Conference: How Regional Planning can Help Support a Competitive Port. Christina DeMarco Metro Vancouver

The CRP stresses a number of factors that point to both our changing demographics and our future opportunities with recommendations for:

Los Alamos Planning Advisory Committee. Stephen Peterson March 19, 2007

Transit Time Shed Analyzing Accessibility to Employment and Services

GIS in Community & Regional Planning

NATURE AND EXTENT OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. Amount of Development Development Zones Distribution of Density Policies

3D - Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan. Lesli Ellis Comprehensive Planning Manager City of Boulder

Urban White Paper on Tokyo Metropolis 2002

Note on Transportation and Urban Spatial Structure

NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. Fair Housing & Equity Assessment & Regional Planning Enhancement

Measuring connectivity in London

Wiarton Revitalization Committee (WRC) Supporting Economic Opportunities for our Town

MODULE 1 INTRODUCING THE TOWNSHIP RENEWAL CHALLENGE

APPENDIX I: Traffic Forecasting Model and Assumptions

"Natural" Cultural Districts and Neighborhood Revitalization

Land Use and Zoning Page 1 of 10 LAND USE AND ZONING

Making space for a more foundational construction sector in Brussels

Developing Innovation Village, Baltimore

Transit-Oriented Development. Christoffer Weckström

Alternatives Analysis

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

Metro Vancouver Shaping Our Future. Regional Growth Strategy. Adopted by the Greater Vancouver Regional District Board on July 29, 2011

Transit Market Index. Validating Local Potential for Transit Ridership

Planning and Property Development Strategic Policy Committee February 2019

CHAPTER 4 HIGH LEVEL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (SDF) Page 95

Urban Planning Word Search Level 1

38th UNWTO Affiliate Members Plenary Session Yerevan, Armenia, 4 October 2016

Preliminary findings on Public Spaces and Social Innovation

NEW WATERFRONT METROPARK. P u b l i c O p e n H o u s e, J u n e 2 1,

2 nd Semester. Core Courses. C 2.1 City and Metropolitan Planning. Module 1: Urban Structure and Growth Implications

Declaration Population and culture

An online data and consulting resource of THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO THE JACK FORD URBAN AFFAIRS CENTER

MPOs SB 375 LAFCOs SCAG Practices/Experiences And Future Collaborations with LAFCOs

Initial Findings from Regional Initiatives Planning Enhancement Fair Housing & Equity Assessment

Tourism. April State Planning Policy state interest guideline. Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning

Foreword. Vision and Strategy

Social Indicators and Trends 2014

Westside Extension Los Angeles, California

APPENDIX I - AREA PLANS

MIAMI 21 PUBLIC HEARING-FIRST READING

City of Manitou Springs

About Visualizing Density

Knowledge claims in planning documents on land use and transport infrastructure impacts

City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA

Exhibit IV-1: Initiation of Zoning Map Amendments Case Report HEARING DATE: MAY 3, 2012

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Economic and Social Urban Indicators: A Spatial Decision Support System for Chicago Area Transportation Planning

Accessibility as an Instrument in Planning Practice. Derek Halden DHC 2 Dean Path, Edinburgh EH4 3BA

Dublin Chamber submission on Dublin City Development Plan : Outdoor Advertising Strategy

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT OF CITY- OWNED SITES WITH PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT PARTICIPATION

Analysis of Change in Land Use around Future Core Transit Corridors: Austin, TX, Eric Porter May 3, 2012

Al Ain Cultural Heritage Management Strategy 1/102

HSC Geography. Year 2013 Mark Pages 10 Published Jul 4, Urban Dynamics. By James (97.9 ATAR)

INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN INNOVATIONS IN METRO RAIL. Gerald Ollivier Transport Cluster Leader Singapore, World Bank

Albuquerque City-wide Zoning Remapping

ANNEX 3 SOFIA S DEVELOPMENT AND SPATIAL STRUCTURE. 1. Introduction

River North Multi-Modal Transit Analysis

The role of community in urban regeneration: mixed use areas approach in USA

LONDON. January, 2013

The National Spatial Strategy

I. M. Schoeman North West University, South Africa. Abstract

Opportunities and challenges of HCMC in the process of development

Transcription:

TOD Priority Tool Executive Summary A Resource for Identifying TOD Opportunities to Support High-Capacity Transit Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Austin, Texas

3 TOD PRIORITY TOOL THE TOD PRIORITY TOOL Capital Metro is undertaking a system-wide initiative to encourage transit-oriented development (TOD) along its high-capacity MetroRapid and MetroRail transit corridors. TOD is an attractive, walkable, and sustainable development pattern organized around high-capacity transit that can maximize Capital Metro s system ridership and offer residents of the Greater Austin area with an array of housing choices, and convenient access to the region s jobs, services, campuses, and amenities. This new TOD Priority Tool which provides a foundation for planning and investment strategies around transit stations by: Examining the existing state of transit-oriented development along the Capital Metro system through careful research and analysis of each station. Establishing a closer relationship between land use decisions and transit system efficiencies, improving both to increase ridership. Identifying station-specific implementation action items. The TOD Priority Tool is focused on areas within a half-mile radius around high-capacity transit stations on the MetroRapid and MetroRail system. The current version of the Tool, accessible from Capital Metro s website and in a full report, provides information about MetroRapid 801 stations and will add information about MetroRapid 803 and MetroRail stations later in 2016. TOD is not a one-size-fits-all idea, and it doesn t happen overnight. Within Greater Austin, and even within a high-capacity transit corridor, TOD can occur in different shapes, sizes, and timeframes. A key feature of Capital Metro s Priority TOD Tool is an analytic framework that helps recognize how individual stations are alike, how they differ, and what they need to attract transit-oriented development. This framework consists of two distinct classification schemes: a TOD Place Typology that describes different kinds of station areas, and a TOD Readiness Score that evaluates how a given station area is progressing. The TOD Place Typology sorts Capital Metro s transit stations into five categories differentiated by location, connectivity, land use, urban form, and intensity. A station s Typology category reflects its existing conditions as well as its future aspirational character. In that sense, the Typology is timeless it reflects the ultimate vision for a station area, regardless of current conditions, and is not expected to change unless the community s vision for a neighborhood or district fundamentally changes. The purpose of the Typology is to establish consistent expectations for the longterm character of station-area development, supported by diverse public sector and community stakeholders. The TOD Readiness Score, by contrast, measures how a station is doing relative to the full TOD potential implied by its Place Typology category. This score, which is scalar rather than categorical, is expected to change over time as conditions in a station area evolve. The purpose of the Readiness Score is two-fold: to identify the high-priority investments or other actions required to get the ball rolling in a given station area, and to set realistic expectations for the timeframe in which different stations are likely to achieve their TOD potential. The core of the TOD Priority Tool is the compendium of station profiles, found online and in the full report. These profiles inventory current conditions and provide a rich database for evaluating potential for TOD. TOD is a form of city design that integrates walking and biking with buses and trains, through smaller block sizes, complete streets, compact development, shade, places to sit, buildings with shop fronts, and other people-friendly features. TOD is not a building or a project. It s a comprehensive pattern of land use and development. Nor is it a universal, one-size-fits-all pattern; TOD can and does vary from setting to setting, with different mixes of land use; different levels of population, employment, and civic activity; and different scales of development.

TOD PRIORITY TOOL 4 TOD PLACE TYPOLOGY Capital Metro s TOD Place Typology includes five categories of TOD that reflect current and planned urban form in Capital Metro s service area. CENTRAL CORE REGIONAL HUB TOD VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD TOD SPECIAL DESTINATION Region s Primary Urban Center Emerging Center of Regional Significance Urban Sub-Area Local Activity Node Center with Predominant Single Use MORE DENSE AND DIVERSE LESS DENSE AND DIVERSE Central Core station areas are located in the primary urban center, in and immediately adjacent to the downtown areas of the City of Austin. Compared to other place types, these station areas have the greatest diversity and mix of land uses, and feature the highest densities of built uses. Destinations in these areas are dynamic multi-purpose or seven-day attractions, and span the spectrum of residential clusters; business, government and institutional nodes; and entertainment and visitor features. These stations feature the highest segment ridership statistics in the system. Regional Hub station areas are emerging centers of regional significance located outside of the Central Core. These station areas feature high densities and diverse mixes of land uses, and are multi-purpose destinations. These areas feature high multimodal accessibility, and highly planned or grid-block patterns of paths and streets. Stations feature high segment ridership.

5 TOD PRIORITY TOOL TOD Village stations are the focal points of urban sub-areas. These are nodes of moderate to high density amid lower-density surroundings. They feature a diverse mix of land uses and attractions, although the outlying portions of a station area may feature more concentrations of single use, such as residential or employment. These station areas function both as regional destinations as well as neighborhood service centers. They offer multi-modal access, and have an organized grid block pattern of paths and streets. Special Destinations station areas are organized around a predominant single-use attractor, destination, or function. This destination is a potentially significant transit trip-generator, but unlikely to support a typical mixed-use TOD pattern due to visitor trip purpose. It may contain retail or other uses in an ancillary or support capacity. Neighborhood TOD station areas feature moderate density at the core or station site amid lower surroundings, but with less contrast outward across the station area than previous categories. These areas are more locally focused nodes, with neighborhood scale commercial uses that support the nearby and surrounding residential areas. There is good pedestrian and bicycle connectivity in these station areas. In addition to the Place Typology assignments, stations may be designated with a functional overlay, based upon particular transit rider patterns based on uses in the area. Education Industry/ Technology Entertainment/ Recreational Major Retail

TOD PRIORITY TOOL 6 PLACE TYPOLOGY MAP All five Place Typology categories are present on the MetroRapid 801 corridor. Tech Ridge (RH/IT) «801!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Chinatown (NT/RT) Masterson (NT) Rundberg (TV) «803 North Lamar (SD) COL OR AD O RI VE R Crestview Station (TV) Brentwood (NT) Triangle (TV) Hyde Park (NT) UT Stations (CC/ED) Downtown Stations - North (CC) Downtown Stations - South (CC/ER) Auditorium Shores (CC/ER) «803 Soco (TV) Oltorf (TV) «801 St. Edwards (NT/ED) South Congress Transit (SD) TYPOLOGY Central Core (CC) Regional Hub (RH) TOD Village (TV) Little Texas (NT) Pleasant Hill (NT) Neighborhood TOD (NT) Special Destination (SD) OVERLAY Education (ED) Entertainment/Recreation (ER) Industry/Tech (IT)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Southpark Meadows (SD/RT)!!! Major Retail (RT)!!!!!!

7 TOD PRIORITY TOOL TOD READINESS The TOD Readiness Score that summarizes how far a station has progressed toward its full TOD potential and how far it has to go. Unlike the TOD Place Typology, a station s TOD Readiness Score can and hopefully will change over time, as conditions evolve and TOD takes hold in the market. The TOD Readiness Score has four levels. Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 LONG TERM exhibiting few of the place typology characteristics EMERGING READY ARRIVED beginning to demonstrate some of the place typology characteristics TOD READINESS showing place typology characteristics in much of the station area, but with gaps that are reasonably expected to be closed demonstrating place typology characteristics in much of the station area, particularly in the primary corners or areas adjacent to the stations, with some opportunity for continued infill or redevelopment Capital Metro considers the four dimensions when assessing the Readiness of its station areas to attract successful TOD. Connectivity: How well the station is connected to its surroundings and to other parts of the transportation network. TOD requires high levels of multi-modal connectivity between the station and its surrounding neighborhoods. Frequent and reliable transit service is necessary, as is easy and safe movement along sidewalks and bikeways connecting to the station. Access to primary vehicular routes is also supportive of development, as is convenient access to the region s employment base and other activity centers. Market Strength: How the real estate market is performing in the station area. Areas exhibiting strong real estate fundamentals are likely to evolve into TOD more quickly than those lacking density, development activity, and market performance. A strong resident and employment base provides a captive audience for transit, retail, and other uses. Development begets other development successful pioneering real estate projects trigger additional projects, and investment in established neighborhoods encourages other owners to maintain their properties and look for opportunities for infill development or redevelopment.

TOD PRIORITY TOOL 8 Land Availability: The extent to which the station area has vacant and underutilized land which could be developed or redeveloped. TOD is only possible to the extent that property is available, in parcels of practically developable size and shape. Some stations have plenty of open, developable land. Others, located in areas already developed, may provide opportunities carved out of places that are not immediately obvious: surface parking lots, publicly owned facilities, and underutilized or vacant properties ready for reuse. Such development is especially important at the corners and street frontages immediately around a transit station, where progress toward TOD (or lack of it) is highly visible. Government support: The degree of to which the relevant jurisdictions provide planning, regulatory, and infrastructure support for TOD. Supportive land use plans and regulations, as well as local infrastructure investment policies, profoundly affect the feasibility of TOD. Without the underlying zoning, subdivision regulations, land use plans, and other administrative tools in place, the market may not be able to implement the mix of uses, form, and scale characteristic of TOD by-right, or without special permissions and interventions. Likewise, how local government prioritizes and executes investments in civil infrastructure, such as street maintenance, sidewalk repair, bicycle paths, and provision of water and sewer, has a real influence on how and where development or redevelopment happens.

9 TOD PRIORITY TOOL READINESS MAP Stations on the MetroRapid 801 corridor exhibit all four stages of TOD Readiness. Tech Ridge «801 Chinatown Masterson Rundberg «803 North Lamar COL OR AD O RI VE R Crestview Station Brentwood Triangle Hyde Park UT Stations Downtown Stations - North Downtown Stations - South Auditorium Shores «803 Soco Oltorf St. Edwards South Congress Transit «801 Little Texas Pleasant Hill MARKET READINESS Long-Term Emerging Ready Arrived Southpark Meadows

TOD PRIORITY TOOL 10 IMPLEMENTATION There are many locations across Capital Metro s high-capacity transit network that are capable of producing vibrant transitoriented development. The TOD Place Typology establishes the long-term vision for each station area. The TOD Readiness Score, along with its underlying subscores and metrics, provides a marker of how closely a station area currently resembles its aspirational TOD potential, while highlighting those aspects of TOD Readiness that are lagging. By examining the Readiness Scores, stakeholders can identify and prioritize the unique combinations of capital and infrastructure investments, policy and regulatory changes, and development initiatives that can move the station area up the Readiness scale. Connectivity: Improvements to station area Connectivity will improve physical access to and through a station area by all transportation modes, as well as increasing access to the potential pool of riders who might visit or use the station area. Market Strength: Improvements to station area Market Strength will improve the fundamental conditions necessary for successful real estate development and competitive position relative to other areas within Greater Austin. Encourage projects that accommodate a mix of land uses to enhance ridership: residential, retail, office, cultural, civic and employment uses should synergize to promote inbound and outbound transit demand and a vibrant 24x7 environment. Land Availability: Land is a finite resource, and the ability to increase the supply is limited, especially in mature developed areas. Opportunities lie in creative possibilities to find sites in mature areas by spinning off underutilized portions of developed properties, by assembling smaller parcels where appropriate to create more viable development blocks, and by setting the stage for transit-oriented reuse as properties turn over or station-area land values increase relative to the cost of improvements. In addition to these general strategies, each station profile contains specific opportunities to improve the prospects for future TOD success, organized in six topical areas: Safety and security: Implement amenities to increase safety through techniques such as improved lighting, signage, and placement and maintenance of infrastructure. Streetscape improvements: Make improvements to the aesthetics and function of the street experience for bicyclists and pedestrians, as well as vehicular movement around the transit station. Development and Redevelopment Opportunities: Support new construction, renovation, and revitalization of station area property. Station amenities: Add to the Capital Metro station facilities, such as shelters, seating, real-time information displays, and so forth. Other amenities: Make enhancements to the transit station and station area not captured above, to improve the vitality, quality of life, and navigation of the station area. Public space / Placemaking / Arts: Enhance public spaces at the transit station and throughout the surrounding district that reinforce district character and identity of the neighborhood and take advantage of the regions innovative funding techniques. These implementation strategies for each high-capacity station area are summarized on the individual station area profiles, found in online and in the full report. Government Support: Improved readiness in Government Support can be accomplished by changes to public policy, investment strategies, and administrative controls and processes, consistent with the aspirational vision of the TOD Place Typology. Ensure by-right land entitlement ordinances and regulations permit development consistent with the Place Typology. Ensure public infrastructure investments improve connectivity and contribute to site redevelopment readiness.

Capital Metro Transportation Authority Strategic Planning and Development/TOD 2910 E 5th Street Austin, Texas 78702 TOD@capmetro.org Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Austin, Texas