PoS(HEP2005)010. Spontaneously Induced Gravity: From Rippled Dark Matter to Einstein Corpuscles. Aharon Davidson and Ilya Gurwich

Similar documents
Diffusive DE & DM. David Benisty Eduardo Guendelman

HOMEWORK 10. Applications: special relativity, Newtonian limit, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, cosmology, 1 black holes

Equation of state of dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 91, (2015)

Black-hole binary inspiral and merger in scalar-tensor theory of gravity

Curved Spacetime III Einstein's field equations

Einstein s Theory of Gravity. December 13, 2017

Gravitational collapse and the vacuum energy

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Solar system tests for linear massive conformal gravity arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 8 Apr 2016

Tutorial I General Relativity

2 Post-Keplerian Timing Parameters for General Relativity

Theory. V H Satheeshkumar. XXVII Texas Symposium, Dallas, TX December 8 13, 2013

Static Hydrodynamic Equation in 4d BSBM Theory

arxiv:gr-qc/ v3 11 Aug 1998

Stability of Stellar Filaments in Modified Gravity Speaker: Dr. Zeeshan Yousaf Assistant Professor Department of Mathematics University of the Punjab

Inflationary cosmology from higher-derivative gravity

General Relativity. Einstein s Theory of Gravitation. March R. H. Gowdy (VCU) General Relativity 03/06 1 / 26

D. f(r) gravity. φ = 1 + f R (R). (48)

General Relativity and Differential

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 20 Apr 2006

Black-Hole Solutions with Scalar Hair in Einstein-Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Theories

New Blackhole Theorem and its Applications to Cosmology and Astrophysics

Cosmic Bubble Collisions

General Relativity Lecture 20

1 Introduction. 1.1 Notations and conventions

Charged Boson Stars and Black Holes in Horndeski Gravity

Cosmology (Cont.) Lecture 19

Higgs-Field and a New Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity

From An Apple To Black Holes Gravity in General Relativity

On Black Hole Structures in Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity

Braneworlds: gravity & cosmology. David Langlois APC & IAP, Paris

Third Year: General Relativity and Cosmology. 1 Problem Sheet 1 - Newtonian Gravity and the Equivalence Principle

Chapter 2 General Relativity and Black Holes

Bachelor Thesis. General Relativity: An alternative derivation of the Kruskal-Schwarzschild solution

Gravity and scalar fields. Thomas P. Sotiriou SISSA - International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste (...soon at the University of Nottingham)

Attractor Structure of Gauged Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model

Colliding scalar pulses in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2013

An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 20 May 2005

The D 2 Limit of General Relativity

Chameleon mechanism in f(r) modified gravitation model of polynomial-exponential form

Theoretical Models of the Brans-Dicke Parameter for Time Independent Deceleration Parameters

Scale-invariant alternatives to general relativity

Dynamical compactification from higher dimensional de Sitter space

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 13 Aug 2016

Vacuum polarization effects on quasinormal modes in electrically charged black hole spacetimes.

Set 3: Cosmic Dynamics

The Geometric Scalar Gravity Theory

Scale-invariance from spontaneously broken conformal invariance

Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter from dilatation symmetry

Lecture 1 General relativity and cosmology. Kerson Huang MIT & IAS, NTU

Quantum Gravity and Black Holes

A Derivation of the Kerr Metric by Ellipsoid Coordinate Transformation. Abstract

Theoretical Aspects of Black Hole Physics

Einstein Toolkit Workshop. Joshua Faber Apr

Backreaction as an explanation for Dark Energy?

Universal Relations for the Moment of Inertia in Relativistic Stars

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 10 Aug 2004 DARK ENERGY, DARK MATTER AND FERMION FAMILIES IN THE TWO MEASURES THEORY

The Coulomb And Ampère-Maxwell Laws In The Schwarzschild Metric, A Classical Calculation Of The Eddington Effect From The Evans Unified Field Theory

Brane-World Cosmology and Inflation

The abundant richness of Einstein-Yang-Mills

Einstein Double Field Equations

Emergent Universe by Tunneling. Pedro Labraña, ICC, Universidad de Barcelona and Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chile.

κ = f (r 0 ) k µ µ k ν = κk ν (5)

PAPER 310 COSMOLOGY. Attempt no more than THREE questions. There are FOUR questions in total. The questions carry equal weight.

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 7 Jan 2019

Kerr black hole and rotating wormhole

Is Cosmic Acceleration Telling Us Something About Gravity?

Lecture: General Theory of Relativity

Astr 2320 Tues. May 2, 2017 Today s Topics Chapter 23: Cosmology: The Big Bang and Beyond Introduction Newtonian Cosmology Solutions to Einstein s

Are spacetime horizons higher dimensional sources of energy fields? (The black hole case).

Anisotropic Interior Solutions in Hořava Gravity and Einstein-Æther Theory

A rotating charged black hole solution in f (R) gravity

The Schwarzschild Metric

Self trapped gravitational waves (geons) with anti-de Sitter asymptotics

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

BLACK HOLES (ADVANCED GENERAL RELATIV- ITY)

The Apparent Universe

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Physics 8.286: The Early Universe October 27, 2013 Prof. Alan Guth PROBLEM SET 6

5.5 Energy-momentum tensor

Law of Gravity, Dark Matter and Dark Energy

Studying the cosmological apparent horizon with quasistatic coordinates

A Summary of the Black Hole Perturbation Theory. Steven Hochman

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 2. General Relativity

Black Holes in Higher-Derivative Gravity. Classical and Quantum Black Holes

Oddities of the Universe

The Influence of DE on the Expansion Rate of the Universe and its Effects on DM Relic Abundance

Some simple exact solutions to d = 5 Einstein Gauss Bonnet Gravity

Gravitational Waves versus Cosmological Perturbations: Commentary to Mukhanov s talk

2.1 Basics of the Relativistic Cosmology: Global Geometry and the Dynamics of the Universe Part I

General Relativity and Cosmology. The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang

Lecture 13 Friedmann Model

A A + B. ra + A + 1. We now want to solve the Einstein equations in the following cases:

Graceful exit from inflation for minimally coupled Bianchi A scalar field models

The Time Arrow of Spacetime Geometry

Gauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov

An Overview of Mathematical General Relativity

Brane in the Relativistic Theory of Gravitation

NEWTONIAN COSMOLOGY. Figure 2.1: All observers see galaxies expanding with the same Hubble law. v A = H 0 r A (2.1)

Transcription:

Spontaneously Induced Gravity: From Rippled Dark Matter to Einstein Corpuscles and Ilya Gurwich Ben-Gurion University, Israel E-mail: davidson@bgu.ac.il Suppose General Relativity, provocatively governed by a dimensional coupling constant, is a spontaneously induced theory of Gravity. Invoking the Zee mechanism, we represent the reciprocal Newton constant by a Brans Dicke scalar field, and let it damped oscillating towards its General Relativistic VEV. The corresponding cosmological evolution, in the Jordan frame, averagely resembles the familiar dark radiation -> dark matter -> dark energy domination sequence. The fingerprints of the theory are fine ripples, hopefully testable, in the FRW scale factor; they die away at the strict General Relativity limit. Also derived is the spherically symmetric static configuration associated with spontaneously induced General Relativity. At the stiff scalar potential limit, the exterior Schwarzschild solution is recovered. However, due to level crossing at the would have been horizon, it now connects with a novel dark core characterized by a locally varying Newton constant. The theory further predicts light Einstein-style gravitational corpuscles (elementary particles?) which become point-like at the GR-limit. International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics July 21st - 27th 2005 Lisboa, Portugal Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/

Spontaneously Induced Gravity Suppose General Relativity (GR) is spontaneously induced. In which case, it makes sense to promote the (reciprocal) Newton constant to the level of a scalar field G 1 (x), and let it damped oscillate towards its General Relativistic vacuum expectation value < G 1 (x) >= G 1. The Zee realization of such an idea calls for a generalized (explicitly broken conformal invariance) Brans- Dicke theory, where the a Brans-Dicke Lagrangian ( I = φr + ω ) g φ gµν φ,µ φ,ν +V (φ) + L matter d 4 x (1) is supplemented by a tenable scalar potential V (φ). For the sake of simplicity, one may momentarily switch off the matter Lagrangian L matter. Associated with the above action are the gravitational field equations φg µν = φ ;µν + g µν g αβ φ ;αβ + ω ( ) 1 φ 2 g µνg αβ φ,α φ,β φ,µ φ,ν + 1 2 g µνv (φ), (2) where G µν = R µν 1 2 g µνr denotes the Einstein tensor. Substituting the Ricci scalar curvature R into the companion scalar field equation ( 2 ω φ φ ;µν 1 ) φ 2 gαβ φ,α φ,β = R + V φ, (3) one finally arrives at g µν φ ;µν = 1 ( φ V ) 3 + 2ω φ 2V. (4) Counter intuitively, the emerging Klein-Gordon equation is governed by the effective potential V e f f (φ) = 1 ( φ V ) 3 + 2ω φ 2V dφ. (5) It is the absolute minimization of V e f f (φ), not of bare V (φ), which sets the VEV of the theory. Such a minimization procedure is generically accompanied by a background cosmological constant Λ 1 4 R = 1 V, such that the constant curvature vacuum solution is de-sitter rather than 4 φ Minkowski. Up to an additive constant, a typical example is given by V (φ) = 6GΩ 2 (φ G 1 ) 2 + 2GΛφ 2 V e f f (φ) = 2Ω 2 (φ G 1 ) 2 (6) It is crucial to notice that (i) The GR-limit is associated with Ω, and (ii) The effective potential is Λ-independent. To appreciate what is going on, here is a cosmological touch for Λ = 0 and ω = 0. Within the framework of k = 0 FRW cosmology, substituting one field equation into the other leaves us with a second order master equation for the Hubble constant At early time (Ωt << 1), we find HḦ + 3H 2 Ḣ 1 2Ḣ2 + 2Ω 2 H 2 = 0. (7) H(t) 1 2t + 4Ωp 5 (Ωt)2, Gφ(t) p + 4p2 Ωt. (8) Ωt 5 010/2 2

Spontaneously Induced Gravity Depending on the sign of p, weak initial gravity may be attractive (p > 0) or repulsive (p < 0). It is only for the special case p = 0 that the φ -expansion starts with Gφ ' 54 Ω2t 2, which implies strong, necessarily attractive, initial gravity. This special case is singled out on finiteness grounds when p noticing that R ' 12Ω2, rather than R ', as t 0. t At later times (Ωt 1), asymptotically approaching GR, our solution exhibits the particular dust dominated behavior modulated by damped oscillations. In particular, the corresponding FRW scale factor a(t) can be integrated to establish our main result sin 2Ωt, 1+ 3Ωt (9) whose consequences are depicted in the Figs.1,2 Figure 1: The Hubble constant H(t) evolution for Λ = 0. Time averaging over the ripples, justified for large Ωt, resembles a General Relativistic matter dominated Universe. Figure 2: Approaching General relativity: The reciprocal Newton constant G 1 (t) evolution for Λ = 0 tells us, quite non-trivially, that the matter dominated Universe is in fact General Relativistic. 010/3 3 a(t) t 2/3

Spontaneously Induced Gravity Two practical questions immediately arise: (i) How large is this Ω frequency? and (ii) Can one experimentally probe the rippled structure? Obviously, following the Nyquist-Shannon theorem, if Ω 1 τ, τ denoting the Hubble time, one would not be able to tell the actual FRW scale a(t) from its coarse grained average. Note in passing that the incorporation of a positive cosmological constant Λ would have a non-trivial effect on the cosmic ripples. Whereas dark matter ripples are 3 only t 1 -suppressed, dark energy ripples are exp( 4Λ t)-suppressed. Another topic of interest is the static radially symmetric line element ds 2 = e ν(r) dt 2 + e λ(r) dr 2 + r 2 dω 2. (10) Based on the following gravitational and scalar field equations (keep Λ = 0, but allow arbitrary ω) φ 1 2 (ν + λ ) (φ + 2r ) φ + ω φ 2 φ = 0, (11) φ + 1 2 (ν λ ) (φ 2r ) φ 2r { ( 2 (1 eλ )φ = 2eλ dv (φ) φ + ω 1 ) } V (φ), (12) 3 + 2ω dφ 2 ( ν φ λ + + 2 { } )φ = eλ dv (φ) φ 2V (φ), (13) 2 r 3 + 2ω dφ there are three basic issues need to be addressed: (i) Deviations from Newton s force law, (ii) The fate of Schwarzschild black-hole away from GR, and (iii) Novel non-gr configurations. Perturbing around the exact Schwarzschild solution, the leading order equation can be solved analytically only for zero mass M = 0; for M 0, a power series in GM is in order. Another constant of integration ε, the would be scalar charge, makes its appearance. Unfortunately, due to length limitations, we are obliged to skip the derivation, but once the dust settles down, Newton s constant is supplemented by a Yukawa tail φ(r) 1 G (1 + εr e ξ Ωr ( 1 + GMΩ ( ( 1 Ωr ξ e 2ξ 2ξ e z z )))) dz + logκr, (14) where ξ 2 3 3 + 2ω. By the same token, Newton s gravitational potential reads now Φ(r) = GM r ε ( ( 2 (1 2r e ξ Ωr GMΩ Ωr + ξ e 2ξ 2ξ e z z ))) dz + logκr. (15) What happens when nearing the would have been Schwarzschild horizon? At the stiff potential limit (Ω ), the exterior Schwarzschild solution (Newton constant G, mass M) is recovered. However, due to a level crossing phenomenon which occurs at the would have been horizon, it now connects with a novel dark core. The latter is characterized by a varying Newton constant accompanied by an exponentially small spatial volume element G in (r) = r2 ( 4GM 2, eλ(r) in e ν(r) r ) 1 δ in lim 2. (16) δ 0 2GM Altogether, as depicted by Figs.3,4, we face a horizon phase transition, meaning a black star is formed. Our theory further predicts light Einstein-style gravitational corpuscles (elementary particles?) which become point-like at the GR-limit. The universal size of such objects is O(Ω 1 ). 010/4 4

Spontaneously Induced Gravity Figure 4: Radial dependence of the Newton constant (the GR case is depicted in blue). Figure 5: Einstein corpuscles: M = 0 localized configurations of universal radius O(Ω 1 ). References [1] A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 417 (1979). [2] A. Davidson, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 1119 (2005). [3] G. Barenboim, O.M. Requejo and C. Quigg, astro-ph/0510178. [4] A. Einstein, Sit. Preus. Akad. (1919). [5] A. Davidson and I. Gurwich (in preparation). 010/5 5 Figure 3: Horizon phase transition: At the stiff scalar potential limit Ω, the recovered exterior Schwarzschild solution (blue) connects with a novel interior core.