Why does the magnetic field of the Earth reverse?

Similar documents
A theoretical analysis of the observed variability of the geomagnetic dipole field

The Madison Dynamo Experiment: magnetic instabilities driven by sheared flow in a sphere. Cary Forest Department of Physics University of Wisconsin

Scope of this lecture ASTR 7500: Solar & Stellar Magnetism. Lecture 9 Tues 19 Feb Magnetic fields in the Universe. Geomagnetism.

DYNAMO THEORY: THE PROBLEM OF THE GEODYNAMO PRESENTED BY: RAMANDEEP GILL

An accurate numerical approach for the kinematic dynamo problem

Circulation-dominated solar shell dynamo models with positive alpha-effect

arxiv: v1 [physics.geo-ph] 4 Jul 2007

Planetary dynamos: Dipole-multipole transition and dipole reversals

Creation and destruction of magnetic fields

22. Kinematic Dynamo Theory; Mean Field Theory. We seek solutions to the Induction (dynamo) equation

Convection-driven dynamos in the limit of rapid rotation

Large scale magnetic fields and Dynamo theory. Roman Shcherbakov, Turbulence Discussion Group 14 Apr 2008

Q: Why do the Sun and planets have magnetic fields?

Turbulent three-dimensional MHD dynamo model in spherical shells: Regular oscillations of the dipolar field

Creation and destruction of magnetic fields

The Magnetic Field of the Earth

Part 1 : solar dynamo models [Paul] Part 2 : Fluctuations and intermittency [Dario] Part 3 : From dynamo to interplanetary magnetic field [Paul]

Anisotropic turbulence in rotating magnetoconvection

The Physics of Fluids and Plasmas

Convection-driven spherical dynamos: remarks on bistability and on simple models of the Solar cycle

ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS Magnetic field generation in weak-line T Tauri stars: an α 2 -dynamo

CHAPTER X. Second Half Review 2017

Reynolds-averaged turbulence model for magnetohydrodynamic dynamo in a rotating spherical shell

Theoretical Geomagnetism. Lecture 2: Self- Exciting Dynamos: Kinematic Theory

Magnetic field reversals in turbulent dynamos

A necessary extension of the surface flux transport model. I. Baumann, D. Schmitt, and M. Schüssler ABSTRACT

Dynamo Simulations in Solar Convection Zone

Simulation Study on the Generation and Distortion Process of the Geomagnetic Field in Earth-like Conditions

Momentum transport from magnetic reconnection in laboratory an. plasmas. Fatima Ebrahimi

Prediction of solar activity cycles by assimilating sunspot data into a dynamo model

Physics (2): Problem set 1 solutions

Magnetic Field in Galaxies and clusters

Konvektion und solares Magnetfeld

Dynamo theory and its experimental validation

Numerical simulation of the Gailitis dynamo David Moss 1 School of Mathematics University of Manchester Oxford Rd Manchester M13 9PL UK

PLASMA ASTROPHYSICS. ElisaBete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino IAG-USP. NOTES: (references therein)

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 11 Oct 2005

We just finished talking about the classical, spherically symmetric, (quasi) time-steady solar interior.

Magnetic waves in a two-component model of galactic dynamo: metastability and stochastic generation

VII. Hydrodynamic theory of stellar winds

Formation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas )

Origin of Magnetic Fields in Galaxies

Magnetic power spectrum in a dynamo model of Jupiter. Yue-Kin Tsang

The geodynamo. Previously The Earth s magnetic field. Reading: Fowler Ch 8, p Glatzmaier et al. Nature 401,

Geomagnetic dipole moment collapse by convective mixing in the core

Nonlinear galactic dynamo models with magnetic-supported interstellar gas-density stratification

Fluctuation dynamo amplified by intermittent shear bursts

Astrophysical Dynamos

Oscillatory dynamos and their induction mechanisms

Solar cycle & Dynamo Modeling

Two Fluid Dynamo and Edge-Resonant m=0 Tearing Instability in Reversed Field Pinch

Fluctuating governing parameters in galaxy dynamo

University, Bld. 1, GSP-2, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, Russia;

Turbulent Magnetic Helicity Transport and the Rapid Growth of Large Scale Magnetic Fields

Parity of solar global magnetic field determined by turbulent diffusivity

Tilts and Obliquities!

Title. Statistical behaviour of optical vortex fields. F. Stef Roux. CSIR National Laser Centre, South Africa

Magnetic field nomenclature

IS THE SMALL-SCALE MAGNETIC FIELD CORRELATED WITH THE DYNAMO CYCLE? ApJ press (arxiv: ) Bidya Binay Karak & Axel Brandenburg (Nordita)

NIMROD simulations of dynamo experiments in cylindrical and spherical geometries. Dalton Schnack, Ivan Khalzov, Fatima Ebrahimi, Cary Forest,

Transition and turbulence in MHD at very strong magnetic fields

Space Plasma Physics Thomas Wiegelmann, 2012

The feasibility of using decadal changes in the geoelectric field to probe Earth s core

Modeling of Transport Barrier Based on Drift Alfvén Ballooning Mode Transport Model

Geomagnetic Dynamo Theory

Planetary Interiors. Earth s Interior Structure Hydrostatic Equilibrium Heating Constituent Relations Gravitational Fields Isostasy Magnetism

(This is a sample cover image for this issue. The actual cover is not yet available at this time.)

Current Profile Control by ac Helicity Injection

The Geodynamo and Paleomagnetism Brown and Mussett (1993) ch. 6; Fowler p

where G is Newton s gravitational constant, M is the mass internal to radius r, and Ω 0 is the

Planetary Interiors. Earth s Interior Structure Hydrostatic Equilibrium Heating Constituent Relations Gravitational Fields Isostasy Magnetism

Chapter 4 Multipole model of the Earth's magnetic field

Foundations of Geomagnetism

Lecture 14: Solar Cycle. Observations of the Solar Cycle. Babcock-Leighton Model. Outline

2. Magnetic Mixing Flows LXXXXX

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and

The Magnetic Field of the Earth. Paleomagnetism, the Core, and the Deep Mantle

Equations of linear stellar oscillations

The total luminosity of a disk with the viscous dissipation rate D(R) is

Space Physics. An Introduction to Plasmas and Particles in the Heliosphere and Magnetospheres. May-Britt Kallenrode. Springer

Module I: Electromagnetic waves

Nonmodal Growth and the Unstratified MRI Dynamo

Chaotic dynamics of the magnetic field generated by a turbulent flow in the VKS experiment

Plasma Physics for Astrophysics

THE RIGA DYNAMO EXPERIMENTS

Amplification of magnetic fields in core collapse

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 24 Jul 2001

Modeling Dust-Density Wave Fields as a System of Coupled van der Pol Oscillators

A numerical MHD model for the solar tachocline with meridional flow

Plasma Astrophysics Chapter 1: Basic Concepts of Plasma. Yosuke Mizuno Institute of Astronomy National Tsing-Hua University

IIE5. Modul Electricity II. Earth s magnetic field

Dynamics of charged particles in spatially chaotic magnetic fields

Magnetic Fields of Neutron Stars. Dipankar Bhattacharya IUCAA, Pune

Paul Charbonneau, Université de Montréal

Non-steady Bullard- Gellman Dynamo Model (2)

Journal of Theoretics

Amplification of magnetic fields from turbulence in the early Universe

Electric and magnetic fields, microwave therapy

Vortex Dynamos. Steve Tobias (University of Leeds) Stefan Llewellyn Smith (UCSD)

The Magnetorotational Instability

Transcription:

IMPRS Solar System Seminar June 2002 Why does the magnetic field of the Earth reverse? Dieter Schmitt (Katlenburg-Lindau) 1. Geomagnetic field >99% of matter in universe is plasma: gas of electrons, ions and neutral particles moving charged particles electric currents magnetic fields basic process magnetic fields everywhere in cosmos: planets, stars, accretion disks, galaxies magnetic field of Earth oldest known magnetic field of a celestial body: compass, Gilbert (1600) Gauss (1838): spherical harmonics, sources in interior, mainly dipolar, E 0.3 G, P 0.6 G, tilt 11, offset 450 km 0.07 R E, D r 3 higher multipoles superposed secular variation westdrift of nonaxisymmetric components of 0.18 /yr pole wobble intensity variations polarity reversals, 10 3 yr 10 5...7 yr

SINT-800 VADM (Guyodo & Valet, 1999) Ma Ma

2. Dynamo theory basics composition of Earth solid inner core, r 1200 km, Fe, Ni fluid outer core, r 3500 km, good electrical conductor, thermal and chemical convection, location of electric currents, which excite the geomagnetic field mantle, poorly conducting; thin crust decay time in core: 10 4...5 yr electromagnetic induction: u j ( u) self-excitation, dynamo-electrical principle (Siemens 1867) disk dynamo: u ux homogenous dynamo, complicated flows, induction equation t = rot (u η rot), differential rotation = pol + tor helical convection (Parker 1955) Ω Ω θ Ω Ωcosθ θ Ω Ωcosθ uxω u uxω u u u j j

theory of mean fields (Steenbeck, Krause & Rädler 1966) = +, u = u + u average: ensemble, azimutal, spatial, temporal t = rot ( u + u η rot) u = α η T rot α = 1 u (t) rot u (t τ)dτ, η 3 T = 1 3 u (t) u (t τ)dτ η αω-dynamo gradω pol tor dynamo number C = R α R Ω = α 0 R/η T Ω 0 R3 /η T α stochastic helicity fluctuations δα of each convective cell α = α 0 (θ) + δα (θ, t) with δα = f rmsf (θ, t) α 0 2Nc sin θ correlation length Rθ c = Rπ/N c, correlation time τ c forcing parameter f 2 rmsθ 2 cτ c back reaction of magnetic field on velocity (u, u ) through Lorentz force, e.g. α()-quenching sign of free

3. 1D mean-field αω-dynamo model azimuthal averages, axisym. component of field = (θ, t) exp(ikr), = rot(p e φ ) + T e φ θ R dimensionless αω-dynamo equation ( ) ( ) ( ) P α/α = 0 P t T C( / θ) sin θ T diffusion operator dynamo number C α fluctuations and quenching: α = α 0 (θ, ) + δα (θ, t) mode structure: fundamental mode: monotonous dipole, supercritical, nonlinearly saturated t t overtones: dipolar and quadrupolar, oscillatory, decaying t

effect of α-fluctuations δα: variation of fundamental mode amplitude t stochastic excitation of higher modes t 4. Numerical results standard case: kr = 0.5, Ccrit = 57.9, C = 100, frms = 6.4, θc = π/10, τc = 5 10 2 part of much longer run with 500 reversals secular dipole ampl. variation d v = h(a hai)2i/hai2 0.16 rapid reversals with Tr 100 τd

reversals through decay of fundamental mode and short-time dominance of oscillating overtones variation of stochastic forcing: top: f rms = 5.4 dv 0.07, T r 500 τ D bottom: f rms = 7.4 dv 0.3, T r 35 τ D linear increase of forcing from f rms = 4.0... 6.5 dv 0.03... 0.17 and T r 20000... 90 τ D

variability / secular variation reversal rate 5. Theoretical analysis Fokker-Planck equation: expansion of into unperturbed eigenmodes b i (θ, t) = a i (t)b i (θ) i a i t = λ i a i + (1 a2 0 ) k N ik a k + k F ik (t)a k averaging over fluctuations p t = a Sa + 1 2 a Dp 2 p(a) probability distribution of fundamental dipole 2 amplitude a = a 0 drift term S = Λ(1 a 2 )a = du/da determined by dynamo model (supercriticality, nonlinearity) diffusion term D = D 0 a 2 + D 1 (a), D 1 (0) 0 depends on forcing f 2 rmsθ 2 cτ c variation of fundamental mode (F 00, D 0 ) influence of overtones (F 0k, D 1 )

bistable oscillator U(a) p(a) -2-1 0 a 1 2 U(a) given by U/ a = S symmetry, central hill, side walls, wells reversals through overtones (D1) reversals fast Ra 1 1 amplitude distribution p(a) D exp 0 2SD dx y d v, Tr frms % y dv % y Tr ball in honey, reversal is random process, no specific cause 6. Comparison with SINT-800 data SINT-800 VADM secular VADM variation d v = 0.071 ± 0.003 dynamo model y Tr 500τD

VADM distribution comparison with dynamo 7. Diffusion time scale τ D VADM(t) and a(t) are essentially the same absolute time turbulent diffusion time adjust τ D until autocorrelation functions match τ D 10 4 yr