NSLS-II. Accelerator Physics Group November 11, Lingyun Yang NSLS-II Brookhaven National Laboratory. Multiobjective DA Optimization for

Similar documents
Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

Towards the ultimate storage ring: the lattice design for Beijing Advanced Proton Source

Status of Optics Design

LOW EMITTANCE STORAGE RING DESIGN. Zhenghao Gu. Department of Physics, Indiana University. March 10, 2013

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

MAX-lab. MAX IV Lattice Design: Multibend Achromats for Ultralow Emittance. Simon C. Leemann

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

Lattice Optimization Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm

HE-LHC Optics Development

Application of Differential Evolution Algorithm in Future Circular Colliders

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Summary Report: Working Group 2 Storage Ring Sources Future Light Source Workshop SLAC, March 1-5, S. Krinsky and R. Hettel

Lecture 2: Modeling Accelerators Calculation of lattice functions and parameters. X. Huang USPAS, January 2015 Hampton, Virginia

Beam dynamics and magnet design challenges for 4th-generation storage ring light sources

III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

Commissioning of PETRA III. Klaus Balewski on behalf of the PETRA III Team IPAC 2010, 25 May, 2010

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

3.2 The MAX IV 3 GeV Storage Ring

Magnet Alignment Sensitivities in ILC DR Configuration Study Lattices. Andy Wolski. US ILC DR Teleconference July 27, 2005

arxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014

Efficient MOGA for NSLS- II Ring Dynamic Aperture Op=miza=on. Yongjun Li, Lingyun Yang and Yoshi Hidaka Photon Sciences Directorate, BNL

Collider Rings and IR Design for MEIC

Polarized electron and positron beams at CEPC

Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase

Optimizing the lattice design for a diffraction-limited storage ring with a rational combination of particle swarm and genetic algorithms

La#ce Design for the MAX IV 3 GeV Storage Ring. A Mul<bend Achromat with Higher- order Mul<poles

Exploration of a Tevatron-Sized Ultimate Light Source

CEPC partial double ring magnet error effects

Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamics by Square Matrix Method

Overview of Acceleration

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

DEVELOPMENT AND BENCHMARKING OF CODES FOR SIMULATION OF BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS AT THE LHC

Modeling CESR-c. D. Rubin. July 22, 2005 Modeling 1

Lattices for Light Sources

Beam Optics design for CEPC collider ring

COMBINER RING LATTICE

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Lattices and Emittance

Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR

Plans for CESR (or Life Without CLEO)

X-Band RF Harmonic Compensation for Linear Bunch Compression in the LCLS

Use of Crab Cavities for Short X-ray Pulse Production in Rings

Low-Emittance Beams and Collective Effects in the ILC Damping Rings

Low alpha mode for SPEAR3 and a potential THz beamline

BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS IN RHIC

First Collective Effects Measurements in NSLS-II A. Blednykh Accelerator Physicist, BNL/NSLS-II Sep , 2014

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Key words: diffraction-limited storage ring, half integer resonance, momentum acceptance, beta beats

Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade

Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring. David L. Rubin December 22, 2011

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.acc-ph] 7 Apr 1998

Emittance preserving staging optics for PWFA and LWFA

Lattice design and dynamic aperture optimization for CEPC main ring

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. A New Structure for the NLC Positron Predamping Ring Lattice

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

Nonlinear dynamics. Yichao Jing

and Applications in the Middle East S E S A M E Applications in the Middle East Upgrading of SESAME to 2.5GeV The Yellow Book November 2003

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

LOW EMITTANCE MODEL FOR THE ANKA SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SOURCE

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

STATUS REPORT ON STORAGE RING REALIGNMENT AT SLRI

Minimum emittance superbend lattices?

1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS

Wigglers for Damping Rings

HIRFL STATUS AND HIRFL-CSR PROJECT IN LANZHOU

Experience on Coupling Correction in the ESRF electron storage ring

Low Emittance Storage Ring for Light Source. Sukho Kongtawong PHY 554 Fall 2016

Features and Applications of the Program elegant. Michael Borland Associate Director Accelerator Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Update on Optics Modeling for the ATF Damping Ring at KEK Studies for low vertical emittance

Beam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1

SLS Status and Development of an SLS2 Upgrade

Single-Bunch Effects from SPX Deflecting Cavities

Pretzel scheme of CEPC

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. Lattice Description for NLC Damping Rings at 120 Hz

Muon RLA Design Status and Simulations

Challenges of the Beam Delivery System for the future Linear Colliders

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

Beam beam simulation. S.Isaacman, A.Long,E.Pueschel, D.Rubin. October 1,

RADIATION SOURCES AT SIBERIA-2 STORAGE RING

INTRA-BEAM SCATTERING, IMPEDANCE, AND INSTABILITIES IN ULTIMATE STORAGE RINGS

DYNAMIC APERTURE STUDIES FOR HL-LHC V1.0 *

FIRST OPERATION OF THE SWISS LIGHT SOURCE

Accelerator Physics Challenges in the Design of Multi-Bend-Achromat-Based Storage Rings

COMMISSIONING OF NSLS-II*

Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations

Electron Cloud in Wigglers

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

( ( )) + w ( ) 3 / 2

FACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities

Abstract. 1. Introduction

ILC Beam Dynamics Studies Using PLACET

Transcription:

Accelerator Physics Group November 11, 2010 Introduction Brookhaven National Laboratory.1 (21)

1 Introduction Introduction.2 (21)

1 Introduction Introduction 2.2 (21)

1 Introduction Introduction 2 3.2 (21)

Introduction Introduction Energy Current Emittance Circumference Cell Straight 3 GeV 500 ma ɛ x = 0.6nm, ɛ y = 8 pm 792 m 30 DBA/15 fold sym. 6.6 m and 9.3 m.3 (21)

Dynamic Aperture Requirement 1 At least 15 mm required from injection group 2 DA at δ = 2.5% helps Touschek lifetime. 3 (take a look at δ = 3.0% when having more RF) Overview and status Before Aug. 2009, DA optimization with nonlinear driving terms are carried out, and continued to ξ x, ξ y = (0, 0), (2, 2), (4.6, 4.6) Weiming Guo (elegant), Johan Bengtsson (Tracy-II), Stephen Kramer... Complementary: Direct tracking, combined with low order nonlinear driving terms are done for similar chromaticities settings. Fanglei Lin (elegant), (elegant/tesla). Introduction.4 (21)

Tracking with elegant and tesla Early stage, elegant (M. Borland etc.) was used for the particle tracking, DA calculation in x y plane and the nonlinear driving terms. New tracking code called tesla was later developed: Linear lattice (nolinear driving terms). Tracking with symplectic integrator. Compact and fast. Good efficiency in searching DA boundary. In the form of library, and linked with optimizer. Irregular DA : maximum survival area in δ x plane. DA at δ = 0, 0.025 and 0.025 was tracked. Introduction.5 (21)

Parallel Multiobjective Optimization A parallel NSGA-II optimizer (K. Deb 2001, Multi-objective optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms). Multi-Objective Genetic Algo. 1: Initialize population. 2: repeat Introduction 7: until should stop 1 Initialize: the very first generation (random). 100 200 CPUs are used for DA optimization..6 (21)

Parallel Multiobjective Optimization A parallel NSGA-II optimizer (K. Deb 2001, Multi-objective optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms). Multi-Objective Genetic Algo. 1: Initialize population. 2: repeat 3: crossover: 2 2 Introduction 7: until should stop 1 Initialize: the very first generation (random). 2 Crossover: generate children from parents. 100 200 CPUs are used for DA optimization..6 (21)

Parallel Multiobjective Optimization A parallel NSGA-II optimizer (K. Deb 2001, Multi-objective optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms). Multi-Objective Genetic Algo. 1: Initialize population. 2: repeat 3: crossover: 2 2 4: mutation: change children. Introduction 7: until should stop 1 Initialize: the very first generation (random). 2 Crossover: generate children from parents. 3 Mutation: change the children slightly. 100 200 CPUs are used for DA optimization..6 (21)

Parallel Multiobjective Optimization A parallel NSGA-II optimizer (K. Deb 2001, Multi-objective optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms). Multi-Objective Genetic Algo. 1: Initialize population. 2: repeat 3: crossover: 2 2 4: mutation: change children. 5: calculate obj. func. f m 6: natural selection: sorting 7: until should stop Introduction 1 Initialize: the very first generation (random). 2 Crossover: generate children from parents. 3 Mutation: change the children slightly. 4 Natural selection: keep population fixed from generation to generation. 100 200 CPUs are used for DA optimization..6 (21)

DA Larger DA area may not necessary provide a better solution,... Introduction Unless it covers an ellipse fully. For δ = 0, 0.025, 0.025, three constraints, three objective functions. Different δ can use same/different ellipse. But, can not avoid small aperture for δ between [ 0.025, 0] and [0, 0.025]. Will solve this later..7 (21)

in x y plane Using elegant with 7 lines mode: Introduction Constraint ellipse A x = 18 mm and A y = 2 mm.8 (21)

DA in δ x Plane Max survival area in δ x plane is more direct: Introduction Large area at y 1um indicates reasonable good at larger y..9 (21)

DA Area and Driving Terms The second strategy uses as objective functions f 1 the sum of the on and off momentum DA and f 2 the geometric sum of tune shifts with amplitude: f 1 = δ S(δ, y = 1µm) ( ) 2 ( ) 2 ( ) 2 νx νx νy (1) f 2 = + + J x J y J y Introduction Tunes with amplitude are chosen. Other driving terms h abcde are not used. Not required but may helps. The multi-objective feature makes the final results not sensitive on how we choose driving terms..10 (21)

Optimize with Sextupole Strength Introduction 6 geometric sextupoles 3 chromatic sextupoles, two for Chromaticity, e.g. (0, 0), (4, 4). Linear lattice is already set and provided by Weiming Guo..11 (21)

Objective Functions of Final Generation Introduction with elegant (M.Borland etc. APS) simulation..12 (21)

Optimize in x y Plane with 6 Sextupoles Tune with amplitude and foot print are shown: Introduction The linear lattice is fixed. Chromaticity is fixed. Only 6 geometric sextupoles are used for optimization. Optimizing in x y plane..13 (21)

Introduction Frequency map of one solution at working point (33.43, 16.35). 3 damping wiggler included. Multipole errors, misalignment and rotation errors are also considered..14 (21)

Optimize in δ x Plane with 9 Sextupoles 6 geometric sextupoles, 2 chromatic for fixed chromaticity and 1 free chromatic sextupole. Introduction.15 (21)

Introduction Frequency map for working point (ν x = 33.15, ν y = 16.27), and chromaticity (ξ x = 4, ξ y = 4). Multipole errors, misalignment and rotation errors are included..16 (21)

Linear Lattice Can be Part of the Optimization Introduction Tune can be varied by β x,y in straight only..17 (21)

Linear Lattice Can be Part of the Optimization Introduction Tune can be varied by β x,y in straight only. High and low beta region can be tuned independently. DW region is fixed..17 (21)

Linear Lattice Can be Part of the Optimization Introduction Tune can be varied by β x,y in straight only. High and low beta region can be tuned independently. DW region is fixed. 9 Sextupoles and 6 quadrupoles are tuned in optimizer..17 (21)

Optimize with Tune Introduction Frequency map of a candidate lattice with tunes (33.28, 16.35) and fitted chromaticity (4.83, 4.80). The rectangle with green dashed line is the constraints. A vertical resonance line, 2ν x + 2ν y = 99, exists around δ = 1% in read and yellow colors..18 (21)

Optimize with Tune Introduction.18 (21)

Driving Terms: Necessary but not Sufficient Do a data mining on the first example, i.e. optimizing DA in x y plane without using driving terms. (Yongjun Li) Introduction σ is sum of normalized driving terms, here are only tunes with amplitude. Normalized by the average of the whole population..19 (21)

High-Low (Low-Low,*) Low-High Fanglei Lin started new HL-beta lattice. Linear and nonlinear optimization. Tunes are (37.18,16.22). Introduction.20 (21)

High-Low (Low-Low,*) Low-High Fanglei Lin started new HL-beta lattice. Linear and nonlinear optimization. Tunes are (37.18,16.22). Optimized with multiobjective optimzer. Introduction Frequency Map and Tune Footprint For standard vacuum vertical gap 25mm Errors: In (x, δ) space 0.5 mrad rms role angle for both quads and sextupoles 0.3 µm rms offset for quads 30 µm rms offset for sextupoles Courtesy of --- Multi-objective optimization for dynamic aperture.20 (21)

High-Low (Low-Low,*) Low-High Fanglei Lin started new HL-beta lattice. Linear and nonlinear optimization. Tunes are (37.18,16.22). Optimized with multiobjective optimzer. Adding DW and physical aperture. (F. Lin) Introduction Frequency Map and Tune Footprint With Physical Aperture.20 (21)

High-Low (Low-Low,*) Low-High Fanglei Lin started new HL-beta lattice. Linear and nonlinear optimization. Tunes are (37.18,16.22). Optimized with multiobjective optimzer. Adding DW and physical aperture. (F. Lin) Introduction Frequency Map and Tune Footprint With Physical Aperture.20 (21)

1 Multi-Objective optimization was done for DA at. 2 Several cases under different chromaticities are studied. 3 Optimized DA is not sensitive to linear tune/lattice. 4 The correlation between DA and driving terms shows that small DT is necessary but not sufficient condition for good DA. 5 High-Low beta lattice optimization is carried out with F. Lin and it is promising. Introduction.21 (21)