Monthly Pile Driving Summary and Underwater Noise Monitoring Results

Similar documents
Near-Field Sturgeon Monitoring for the New NY Bridge at Tappan Zee. Quarterly Report October 1 December 31, 2014

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Passive Acoustic Monitoring Site SAI2 Saipan Island, East Side

A. Windnagel M. Savoie NSIDC

PRMS WHITE PAPER 2014 NORTH ATLANTIC HURRICANE SEASON OUTLOOK. June RMS Event Response

SEPTEMBER 1991 MONTHLY REPORT. Scientific Observation Hole (SOH) Geothermal Resource Permit: GRP TMK: :01; :02; and :32

R.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE. HELAVA CREEKl MILE MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973

Remedial Program. GE Hudson Falls Plant Site. GE Hudson Falls Plant Site. TDCS Status

The chart below shows the fraction and decimal forms of some rational numbers. Write,, or in each blank to make a true sentence.

Geoduck Floating Nursery Monitoring Plan, Quarterly Reporting

Marine Mammal Observer Report

Effects of Hurricanes on Ambient Noise in the Gulf of Mexico

Ice Phenomena on the Lower Vistula

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS: What are Seismic Surveys and How are They Done?

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM SEPTEMBER 25 OCTOBER 8, 2014

Non-Technical Summary

MAURITIUS CANE INDUSTRY AUTHORITY MAURITIUS SUGARCANE INDUSTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

O R D E R OF THE HEAD OF THE STATE NUCLEAR POWER SAFETY INSPECTORATE

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

The Climate of Payne County

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM AUGUST 17 AUGUST 30, 2012

data using low-cost measurement tools 4-inch diameter high capacity rain gauges

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM OCTOBER 13 OCTOBER 26, 2017

PILE SETUP LA-1 EXPERIENCE. Ching-Nien Tsai, P.E.

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM AUGUST 16 AUGUST 29, 2013

Multivariate Regression Model Results

BLOCKS 5 (ANY), 6 (PITU) AND 8 (NAPU)

The DEPONS project Disturbance Effects on the Harbour Porpoise Population in the North Sea

Use of Ocean Observations to Develop Forecasts in Support of Fisheries Management

Prince Edward County Appellation 2015 Growing Season Summary

Appendix D: Acoustic and Explosive Concepts

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM SEPTEMBER 28 OCTOBER 11, 2011

Climatic Conditions Around Greenland 1995

Uniform Sign Plan (USP) Travis Park 89-USP-007

IBHS Roof Aging Program Data and Condition Summary for 2015

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

2013 ATLANTIC HURRICANE SEASON OUTLOOK. June RMS Cat Response

2010 Growing Season. Prince Edward County Report

Great Lakes Update. Volume 193: 2015 January through June Summary. Vol. 193 Great Lakes Update August 2015

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM SEPTEMBER 13-SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

10 May Rod Walls - Director Facilities New Construction, Sustainability Hays CISD IH 35 Kyle, Texas 78640

Basic Noise Calculations April 2007

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM AUGUST 2 AUGUST 15, 2013

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

3. If a forecast is too high when compared to an actual outcome, will that forecast error be positive or negative?

Geovisualization of shipping noise exposure for whales in Canada. Simone Cominelli; Brent Hall; Michael Leahy; Michael Luubert

Comments by William M. Gray (Colorado State University) on the recently published paper in Science by Webster, et al

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SURVEILLANCE IMPACT ON SAMPLE CONSTRUCTION ZONES IN MISSISSIPPI (Part 1: DESCRIPTIVE)

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM AUGUST 4-17, 2015

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM SEPTEMBER 27-OCTOBER 10, 2018

Vineyard Wind NGO Agreement January 22, 2019

Acoustic seafloor mapping systems. September 14, 2010

Climate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL January 13, 2015

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM AUGUST 31 SEPTEMBER 13, 2012

Demand Forecasting Reporting Period: 19 st Jun th Sep 2017

New Policies on Chemical Environmental Management in China. Gao Yingxin Chemical Registration Center of MEP September 9, 2010

The Climate of Grady County

Budge Road Landslide Jackson Extensometer installation report April 2014 with data to 20 May

PG&E OFFSHORE CENTRAL COASTAL CALIFORNIA SEISMIC IMAGING PROJECT

Heathrow Community Noise and Track-keeping Report: Chertsey

Impact of Noise on the Marine Environment a Regulatory Perspective

METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE JAMAICA CLIMATE BRANCH

U.S. - Canadian Border Traffic Prediction

Lease Statistics (The First Half of FY2018)

An Online Platform for Sustainable Water Management for Ontario Sod Producers

See Figure 6-1 (A) below. See Figure 6-1 (B) below db re 1 µpa (duration is s) a J/m 2 Yes

9-8 Completing the Square

The Climate of Haskell County

Structure-Borne Wave Radiation by Impact and Vibratory Piling in Offshore Installations From Sound Prediction to Auditory Damage

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM SEPTEMBER 1 SEPTEMBER 14, 2015

17-20 November 2007 Incidental Take Monitoring Methodology and Results

150. a. Clear fractions in the following equation and write in. b. For the equation you wrote in part (a), compute. The Quadratic Formula

Block 2 ~ The Pythagorean Theorem Self-Assessment. Progress (shade this in) Name Per. Track your understanding. Lesson #

peak half-hourly New South Wales

peak half-hourly Tasmania

Monitoring The HRC-S UV Rate: Observations of Vega

Procedures for the Installation, Adjustment, Maintenance and. Inspection of CWR as Required by 49 CFR

Acoustic Impact of Fire Suppression Nozzles

Day 5 Notes: The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Particle Motion, and Average Value

SHORT NIGHTTIME WATER SHUTDOWN TO OCCUR IN EARLY HOURS OF MAY 29

CHAPTER FIVE: THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI REGION AND PLAQUEMINES PARISH

200Pa 10million. Overview. Acoustics of Speech and Hearing. Loudness. Terms to describe sound. Matching Pressure to Loudness. Loudness vs.

Technical Notes: Magnitude and Return Period of 2004 Hurricane Rainfall in Florida

Huron School District Core Curriculum Guide Grade Level: 4th Content Area: Math

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM SEPTEMBER 15 SEPTEMBER 28, 2015

Climate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL September 9, 2014

11.2 The Quadratic Formula

Parish of Ascension. ASCENSION PARISH SITUATIONAL REPORT 06 August 2008 As of: 1600 Hours

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Conceptual Profile Alternative. Massachusetts Department of Transportation 4-6 December 2010

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2012 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS

The Climate of Marshall County

Analysis of climate-crop yield relationships in Canada with Distance Correlation

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

The Climate of Kiowa County

-- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island

Marine Mammal Modeling. Appendix D

Montmorency County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria

Transcription:

Monthly Pile Driving Summary and Underwater Noise Monitoring Results Pile Driving Period: September 04, 2016 October 01, 2016 DOC Reference: TA_FHWA_03169_RPT_ENV Summary: No sturgeon were observed to have been severely injured or killed as a result of underwater noise from pile driving during this reporting period. This conclusion was reached based on the results of sturgeon monitoring by observers on the barge and vessel-based sturgeon monitoring conducted downstream of the piles being driven. Based on an analysis using both empirical and modeled data, recoverable injuries caused by exposure to sub-lethal levels of underwater noise could not have been sustained by more than one sturgeon during this reporting period. This conclusion was reached by considering: the time required to drive each pile; the underwater area that experienced noise levels higher than a level that could potentially result in recoverable injury to the sturgeon (206 db re 1 µpa peak sound pressure level); and the possible number of sturgeon that could have been in that area (number of gill nets x sturgeon encounter rate). The potential number of sturgeon likely to have experienced recoverable injuries (described as sturgeon take ) is reported as the probability of a fish being affected by exposure to underwater noise from pile driving, as shown in the table below. If the sturgeon take is listed as 1, then 1 sturgeon was potentially exposed to recoverable noise levels. If sturgeon take is less than 1, then it is less likely that 1 sturgeon was affected. As shown at the bottom right of the table below, the sturgeon take for this reporting period was 0.22 sturgeon, which is less than the 0.65 sturgeon that was anticipated based on Table 8 of the 2016 NMFS Biological Opinion (NMFS BO). Introduction: As required under the NMFS BO, dated June 20, 2016, Reasonable & Prudent Measure #1 and Term & Conditions #1, underwater noise resulting from pile installation must be monitored. The following is a summary of the installation and underwater noise monitoring of permanent piles for the time period from August 7 through September 3, 2016. As required under this condition, an estimate of sturgeon take for piles driven during the most recent monthly monitoring period is included. The sturgeon take estimate has been calculated using the times required to drive each pile (impact hammer only) and an estimate of the diameter of the 206 db peak SPL isopleth, which has been conservatively assumed to be equivalent to the largest isopleth measured for piles driven at the same pier (or other representative piles at nearby piers). The take estimate has been compared to that listed for the same piles in Table 8 of the NMFS BO to ensure that sturgeon take is not being exceeded. take summarized in Table 8 applies to both shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon (i.e., it is

anticipated that 6 of each species will be exposed to underwater noise equal to 206 db re 1µ Pa SPL peak during pile driving). This monthly report summarizes pile-driving activities for at the Rockland North Trestle. production piles Pile Installation and Underwater Noise Monitoring: During the monthly period from September 4 through October 1, 2016, piles were driven. All of these were piles driven at the Rockland North temporary trestle (bents 46 through 49). These piles correspond to the scheduled pile-driving for week 24, week 35, and weeks 38-43 of 2016, respectively, in Table 8. Anticipated Take from Table 8 of the NMFS BO For the purposes of tracking take associated with the subset of piles from the groups of piles shown in Table 8 1 (i.e., Anticipated Take), total take for each time period was divided by the number of piles scheduled to be driven during the time period. To calculate anticipated sturgeon take per pile from Table 8 for the piles driven at the Rockland North trestle during this reporting period, the anticipated take of 1 sturgeon for the group containing piles at the Rockland North temporary trestle was divided by the anticipated piles for this group and multiplied by the piles actually driven during the reporting period. The result was an estimate of 0.014 sturgeon per pile for the Rockland North temporary trestle. The same calculation was used to calculate the anticipated sturgeon take per pile from Table 8 for the piles driven. Based on these values: the anticipated take from Table 8 for the piles driven from September 4 through October 1, was 0.173 sturgeon, which was calculated as: 0.012 sturgeon per pile multiplied by piles. the anticipated take from Table 8 for the piles driven at the Rockland North trestle from September 4 through October 1, was 0.141 sturgeon, which was calculated as: 0.014 sturgeon per pile multiplied by piles. the anticipated take from Table 8 for the piles driven from September 4 through October 1, was 0.333 sturgeon, which was calculated as: 0.042 sturgeon per pile multiplied by piles. the cumulative take associated with the piles driven from Table 8 of the June 2016 NMFS BO, including piles at the Rockland North Trestles, is the sum of the anticipated take values for all piles, or 0.65 sturgeon. 1 Anticipated take was calculated in Table 8 of the NMFS BO as the product of the number of piles, number of hours to drive a pile, number of gill nets to span the 206 db peak SPL isopleth, and the sturgeon encounter rate of 0.033 sturgeon per net per hour.

Calculated Take for this reporting period Following the same method used to estimate incidental sturgeon take for Table 8, the product of pile driving time, number of gill nets to span the width of the 206 db isopleth, and sturgeon encounter rate of 0.033 sturgeon per net per hour was used to calculate sturgeon take for the piles driven during this reporting period (i.e., Calculated Take). For previous piles that have been monitored for underwater noise, the diameter of the 206 db peak SPL isopleth was estimated based on the maximum peak SPL recorded during pile driving. For the unmonitored piles, the maximum recorded isopleth diameters was assigned based on noise monitoring from the test pile program or from noise monitoring of piles at each pier. Actual pile driving times for each of the piles were used in the calculations. Impact pile driving has been completed for during this reporting period. production piles; none were driven For the piles driven at the Rockland North temporary trestle, pile-driving times ranged from 0.10 to 0.30 hours to install and averaged 0.20 hours, which exceeded the anticipated duration of 0.17 hours reported in Table 8 of the NMFS BO. For the piles driven pile-driving times ranged from 0.08 to 0.27 hours to install and averaged 0.16 hours, which was less than the anticipated duration of 0.33 hours reported in Table 8 of the NMFS BO. For the piles driven, pile-driving times ranged from 0.27 to 0.38 hours to install and averaged 0.32 hours, which was less than the anticipated duration of 0.33 hours reported in Table 8 of the NMFS BO. Underwater noise monitoring was conducted by NYSTA during pile driving. The results of the noise monitoring was used to estimate the size of the 206-dB SPL peak isopleth for the monitored piles; for unmonitored piles, the average of the maximum SPL peak for monitored piles at each pier/trestle was used to calculate isopleth size. The Calculated Take for this reporting period was below the Anticipated Take from Table 8 of the NMFS BO. Based on the recorded pile-driving times and isopleth widths: the incidental sturgeon take for the piles driven during the monthly period from September 4 through October 1, 2016 was calculated as 0.22 sturgeon, which is less than the estimate of 0.65 sturgeon for the same piles listed in Table 8, the cumulative incidental take for the piles 1 driven as anticipated in Table 8 of the June 2016 NMFS BO was calculated as 0.79 sturgeon, which is less than the anticipated take of 3.08 sturgeon for the same piles in Table 8. During the installation of piles, the size of the 206-dB peak SPL isopleth was estimated to be 89 feet, which is less than the anticipated isopleth diameter of 100 feet indicated in Table 8 of the NMFS BO. During installation of piles at the 1 The piles driven were driven prior to the issuance of the June 2016 BO and were therefore included in previous monthly reports (April 17, 2016 May 09, 2016 and May 15, 2016 June 11, 2016) as part of the monthly and cumulative anticipated take calculations. Because those piles are also included in Table 8 of the June 2016 BO, the anticipated take for those piles will also be included as part of the cumulative take estimates reported in future monthly reports. The incidental take associated has therefore essentially been counted twice.

Rockland North temporary trestle, the size of the 206-dB peak SPL isopleth was estimated to be 115 feet and 148 feet, respectively, which exceeded the anticipated isopleth diameter of 100 feet. The duration of impact pile driving for piles driven was up to 50% less than anticipated in Table 8 of the NMFS BO, while the duration for piles at the Rockland trestle was slightly longer than anticipated. Overall though, the total duration for all piles driven during this reporting period was 7.8 hours, which was less than the anticipated duration of 9.6 hours for these piles. Therefore, despite the larger than anticipated isopleth sizes for some of the piles, the overall shorter duration of impact pile driving resulted in a total duration of impact pile driving that was less than anticipated and, as a result, an incidental take that was less than anticipated in Table 8 of the NMFS BO. In addition, the conservatism applied to estimating sturgeon take in the NMFS BO (i.e., rounding up from 0.05 to the nearest 1 sturgeon) resulted in a total observed sturgeon take for all piles that was less than the anticipated take for piles driven during the current reporting period. Therefore, incidental take for sturgeon was not exceeded during the most recent monthly reporting period for pile driving, nor has the cumulative sturgeon take been exceeded for all piles driven to date.

Report Period: 9/4/2016 to 10/1/2016 Date Year Wee Net Impact Pile Driving Duration Pile driving time from Table 8 of the NMFS BO Average width of isopleth for 206- db peak SPL Maximum width of isopleth for 206-dB peak SPL Number of gill nets to span the 206-dB peak SPL isopleth encounter rate (fish/net/ hour) 8/26/2016 2016 35 0.12 0.33 Not measured 115 0.92 0.033 0.0021 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.32 0.33 72 93 0.74 0.033 0.0078 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.38 0.33 80 93 0.74 0.033 0.0093 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.3 0.33 65 80 0.64 0.033 0.0064 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.27 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0063 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.35 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0082 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.35 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0082 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.3 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0070 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.35 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0082 9/8/2016 2016 37 0.33 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0078 9/9/2016 2016 37 0.28 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0066 9/9/2016 2016 37 0.28 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0066 9/9/2016 2016 37 0.28 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0066 9/9/2016 2016 37 0.32 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0075 9/9/2016 2016 37 0.37 0.33 Not measured 89 0.71 0.033 0.0087 9/15/2016 2016 38 0.1 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0039 9/15/2016 2016 38 0.23 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0090 9/15/2016 2016 38 0.15 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0059 9/15/2016 2016 38 0.2 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0078 9/15/2016 2016 38 0.23 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0090 9/15/2016 2016 38 0.2 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0078 9/15/2016 2016 38 0.15 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0059 9/22/2016 2016 39 0.22 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0086 9/22/2016 2016 39 0.3 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0117 9/22/2016 2016 39 0.22 0.17 Not measured 148 1.18 0.033 0.0086 9/29/2016 2016 40 0.08 0.33 Not measured 115 0.92 0.033 0.0024 9/29/2016 2016 40 0.15 0.33 Not measured 115 0.92 0.033 0.0045 9/29/2016 2016 40 0.12 0.33 Not measured 115 0.92 0.033 0.0036 9/29/2016 2016 40 0.27 0.33 Not measured 115 0.92 0.033 0.0061 take

Report Period: 9/4/2016 to 10/1/2016 Date Year Week Net Impact Pile Driving Duration Pile driving time from Table 8 of the NMFS BO Average width of isopleth for 206- db peak SPL Maximum width of isopleth for 206-dB peak SPL Number of gill nets to span the 206-dB peak SPL isopleth encounter rate (fish/net/ hour) 9/29/2016 2016 40 0.2 0.33 Not measured 115 0.92 0.033 0.0061 9/29/2016 2016 40 0.12 0.33 Not measured 115 0.92 0.033 0.0036 9/29/2016 2016 40 0.23 0.33 Not measured 115 0.92 0.033 0.0070 Monthly sturgeon take (Calculated based on pile-driving data/anticipated from Table 8 of the September 2016 NMFS BO) 0.22/0.65 Cumulative sturgeon take to date (Calculated based on pile-driving data/anticipated from Table 8 of the September 2016 NMFS BO)* 0.79/3.08 take * As of the September 2014 NMFS BO, the exempted incidental take for sturgeon as a result of exposure to underwater noise during impact pile driving was 37 Atlantic sturgeon and 37 shortnose sturgeon. With the issuance of the June 2016 BO, the exempted take was reduced to 6 Atlantic sturgeon and 6 shortnose sturgeon in order to reflect the anticipated incidental take for the remaining piles that will be installed (i.e., the piles associated with the first 31 sturgeon had been driven, and the take accounted for, as of the issuance of the June 2016 BO). To allow tracking of incidental take with respect to Table 8 of the June 2016 BO, the cumulative take reported in the table above will be with reference to 6 sturgeon. Note that previous monthly reports submitted prior to the issuance of the June 2016 BO accounted for estimates of anticipated sturgeon take for piles driven April 17, 2016 May 09, 2016) and May 15, 2016 June 11, 2016. Because the piles are also included in Table 8 of the June 2016 BO, the anticipated take for those piles will also be included as part of the cumulative take estimate reported in future monthly reports.