Study the abundance of insect pollinators/visitors in rapeseed-mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Similar documents
Sesame (Sesamum Indicum L.) Crop Insect Pollinators with Special Reference to the Foraging Activity of Different Species of Honeybees

POLLINATORS VISITING SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUM L.) SEED CROP WITH REFERENCE TO FORAGING ACTIVITY OF SOME BEE SPECIES

INSECT POLLINATORS' DIVERSITY OF RAPESEED (Brassica campestris var. toria) IN CHITWAN, NEPAL

Effect of different modes of pollination on seed set of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) sown on different sowing dates

POLLINATORS VISITING CARROT (DAUCUS CAROTA L.) SEED CROP

G.J.B.B., VOL.7 (2) 2018: ISSN

Flower-visiting insect pollinators of mustard (Brassica napus) in Jammu Region

In seed crop of onion (Allium cepa L.), the

Received: 21st April-2012 Revised: 28 th April-2012 Accepted: 02 nd May-2012 Research article

Diversity and abundance of insect pollinators on Allium cepa L.

Insect Visitors and Abundance of Four Species of Apis on Sunflower Helianthus annuus L. in Pakistan

Effect of pollination modes on yield components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

STUDIES ON FLOWER BIOLOGY AND POLLINATION IN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.)

Oilseed rape pollen dispersal by insect pollinators in agricultural landscape

Who visits the tropical biofuel crop Jatropha curcas L. flowers?

Insect pollinators and their relative abundance on black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) At Dera Ismail Khan

Protecting Pollinating Insects

Habitat Enhancements to Support Bees: Agriculture to Urban Research. Neal Williams Department of Entomology

ABSTRACT. Apiculture is a science-based industry using bees as. micromanipulators to harvest n~ectar and pollen from plant sources to

Seasonal incidence and control of black fly (Aleurocanthus rugosa Singh) infesting betelvine (Piper betle L)

Flower Visitor Interaction and Fruit production of Grewia asiatica L.

COMPARISON OF FORAGING ACTIVITY BETWEEN MASON BEE OSMIA ORIENTALIS

Relative preference of honeybees to new hybrids or old populations and prospects of honey extraction

Protocols to Determine Pollination Requirements and Optimal Pollinators for Plant Genetic Resource Regeneration

Community Involvement in Research Monitoring Pollinator Populations using Public Participation in Scientific Research

Development of regression models in ber genotypes under the agroclimatic conditions of south-western region of Punjab, India

Beneficial Insects. PJ Liesch UW-Madison: Insect Diagnostic Lab

FORAGING PATTERN OF INSECT POLLINATORS IN PENTAS LANCEOLATA (FORSSK.) DEFLERS AND CATHARANTHUS ROSEUS (L.) G. DON IN THRISSUR DISTRICT, KERALA, INDIA

GENETIC VARIABILITY AND CHARACTER ASSOCIATION IN INDIAN MUSTARD [BRASSICA JUNCEA (L) CZERNS & COSS]

LAyOUT OF ExPERIMENTAL SITES

Pollinators. Pam Brown University of Florida/IFAS Extension, Retired

Master Thesis. Complementarity and redundancy of different pollinators on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in Sulawesi (Indonesia)

The Influence of Nectar Sugar Production on Insect Visitors to Flowers of Brassica rapa L. M.A. Taylor and A.R. Davis

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 2, 2016,

Estimates of Variability for Growth and Yield Attributes in Taro (Colocasia esculenta var. Antiquorum (L.) Schott)

Foliar spray of benzoic acids on pollinators behavior and plant fitness benefits

Exposure of pollinating insects to neonicotinoids by guttation on straw cereals after seed-treated sugar beet (November 2017)

THE STUDY OF POLLEN BIOLOGY OF Bauhinia variegata L. AT AGRA (U.P.)

A Gallery of Important Insect Pollinators

Temporal variation and effects of drought in coastal sage scrub plant-pollinator mutualisms

Nectar Sugar Concentration as a Measure of Pollination of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)

INVESTIGATING YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENT OF WINTER RAPESEED CULTIVARS AT BOJNORD-IRAN

RESEARCH NOTE: NECTAR CONTENT OF NEW ZEALAND HASS AVOCADO FLOWERS AT DIFFERENT FLORAL STAGES

Morphometric and Wings Venation Analysis of Honey Bee Species in Dehradun, Uttarakhand

Pea Patch Pollination Game

Benefits of Insect Pollination to Confection Sunflowers: Comparisons across three states and multiple hybrids

Materials and Methods. Usman H Dukku α, Zecarias Russom σ & Albert G Domo ρ

Key Words: conservation biology, insectary plants, cover crops, nectar, pollen, syrphids, biological control

Annie S. White, PhD, ASLA. How Native Cultivars Affect Plant/Pollinator Interactions

Protecting Pollinators in Home Lawns and Landscapes

The Na've Bees of North America- Essen'al Partners in Pollina'on and The stresses impac'ng their popula'ons

Impact of Honeybee and Other Insect Pollinators on the Seed Setting and Yield Production of Black Cumin Nigella sativa L.

Estelar. The available literature on the present investigation and related aspects has been reviewed and presented below under following headings:

A glimpse on Insect capturing glandular hairs of Plumbago zeylanica Linn. and Plumbago auriculata Lam.

Seasonal Incidence of Lemon Butterfly, Papilio demoleus Linn. on Bael

EVALUATION OF SOME MANGO CULTIVARS UNDER NORTH INDIAN CONDITIONS

Population Dynamics of Sugarcane Plassey Borer Chilo tumidicostalis Hmpson (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Population dynamics of chiku moth, Nephopteryx eugraphella (Ragonot) in relation to weather parameters

Smart Gardening for Pollinators

Pollination of Pumpkin and Winter Squash - Thanks to Bumble Bees! Dr. Kimberly Stoner Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station New Haven

Potential Pollinators of Gossypium hirsutum L.

Factors affecting pollination activity of Megachile lanata lepel

Honey Bees QUB Green Champions 9 th April

Flower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems

Honey Bees. QUB CCRCB 11 th January

An assessment of Vicia faba and Trifolium pratense as forage crops for Bombus hortorum

Development of Agrometeorological Models for Estimation of Cotton Yield

Pollinator Adaptations

Flowering performance of Polianthes tuberosa Linn. cv. ëcalcutta Doubleí as influenced by thermal regime

Apis mellifera scuttelata. Common names: African honeybee also nicknamed the killer bee

14 th North America Agroforestry Conference Ames, IA June 1 th, Gary Bentrup Research Landscape Planner USDA National Agroforestry Center

Pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus Fab) susceptibility to synthetic pyretroids pilot study in Estonia

There are approximately 25,000 species of Bee in the World There are almost 4000 species of Bee in North America There are approximately 1000

Pollination, the Grand Interaction Among Flowers, Bees, Growers and Beekeepers

In-hive pollen transfer between bees enhances cross-pollination of plants

Rice is one of the most important food

Mutualism: Inter-specific relationship from which both species benefit

Mutualism. Mutualism. Mutualism. Early plants were probably wind pollinated and insects were predators feeding on spores, pollen or ovules

Beneficial Insects in the Garden: Meet the Good Guys!

Where in the world does your food come from?

Pollination Best Practices in Southern Highbush Blueberry in Florida 1

Land, water and bees don t take us for granted: Bees and their pollinating partners

INFLUENCE OF WEATHER CONDITIONS ON HONEY BEE VISITS (Apis mellifera carnica) DURING SUNFLOWER (Helianthus annuus L.

FLORAL PREFERENCES OF BUMBLE BEES (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE: BOMBUS LATREILLE) IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION OF TURKEY

How much flower-rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge

Dynamics of Mango Hopper Population under Ultra High Density Planting

Research Article. Purti 1 *, Rinku 1 and Anuradha 2

Yield Crop Forecasting: A Non-linear Approach Based on weather Variables

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

Preying Propensity of Larvae/ Grubs of Syrphid and Coccinellid Predators on Mustard APHID, Lipaphis Erysimi (KALT.)

Enhancement of Avocado Pollination and Fruit Yield

SUMMER NECTAR AND FLORAL SOURCES

Gene Action and Combining Ability in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Involving Indica and Tropical Japonica Genotypes

Influence of the sulfur nutritional status on color and scent of flowers

Population distribution of thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in rose plant within different plant parameters

Rearing Honeybee Queens in, Apis Mellifera L. Colonies During the Activity Season of Oriental Wasps Vespa Orientalis L

Pollination Lab Bio 220 Ecology and Evolution Fall, 2016

Bee common name. Search

Bees, Urbanization, Habitat Loss

Studies on Population Dynamics of Spotted Pod Borer Maruca vitrata in Dolichos Bean, Lablab purpureus L. and their Relation with Abiotic Factors

Transcription:

2018; 6(2): 2563-2567 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 JEZS 2018; 6(2): 2563-2567 2018 JEZS Received: 12-01-2018 Accepted: 15-02-2018 SK Giri Umesh Chandra Gajendra Singh MP Gautam Ramesh Jaiswal Correspondence SK Giri Study the abundance of insect pollinators/visitors in rapeseed-mustard (Brassica juncea L.) SK Giri, Umesh Chandra, Gajendra Singh, MP Gautam and Ramesh Jaiswal Abstract The present investigation entitled Impact of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) pollination in mustard (Brassica campestris var. toria) to the enhancement of seed yield in randomized block design was recorded at Student Instructional Farm of N.D.U.A.T, Kumarganj, Faizabad during Rabi 2016-17. The result revealed that the insects of order-hymenoptera namely; Apis dorsata, Apis mellifera, T. irridipennis were the major floral visitors belonging to family Apidae. The insects among this apidae family, Apis dorsata and A. mellifera were the most frequent visitors. The abundance of insect pollinators was found maximum in afternoon (3.00-4.00 PM) with 31.56 pollinators /plant/5 min. The higher number of floral visitors in the evening can be attributed of favorable meteorological parameters of afternoon. However, A. dorsata showed its maximum visit on flowers in afternoon with respect to other pollinators. The maximum pod setting 76.24 pod/plant and 83.50 percent seed setting were recorded in openpollination followed by bee-pollination with 71.20 pod/plant and 78.25 percent seed setting and minimum pod setting 69.12 pod/plant and 71.80 percent seed setting in self-pollination. Keywords: Abundance, pollinators, visitors, rapeseed-mustard, Brassica juncea. Apis dorsata, Apis mellifera and Trigona irridipennis 1. Introduction India is one of the largest rapeseed-mustard growing country in the world occupying the third position in the area and in production after China and Canada with 12% of the worlds total production. Brassica juncea is the second most important oilseed crop in the country after groundnut and accounts for nearly 30.7% of the total oilseed production in the country. At global level rapeseed-mustard is cultivated on 36.15 m ha with production of 71.09 mt. Rapeseed-mustard oil production increased from 1.94 million MT from 2014-15 to 2.11 million MT in 2015-16. European Union (EU) is expected to be the top producer followed by China and Canada in 2015-16. India may be the fourth largest producer. India s share in global production of mustard oil in 2015-16 may be around 9.0 percent. The US and China were the leading importing countries of mustard oil in the world. India was the 7 th largest importing country in 2013-14. (Anonymous 2015) [5]. Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.], which is cultivated throughout the world belongs to the family Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) under the genus Brassica, cultivated all over India and it is the major rabi oilseed crop of northern India. It has 38 to 42% oil & 24% protein. Honeybees provide pollination services to several cultivated and wild species, thereby, maintaining biological diversity. Bee poisoning or killing of bees from pesticides continues to be a serious problem for beekeepers. Most bee kill occurs when pesticides are applied or allowed to drift on to flowering crops or weeds. Most (99%) bee kills result from bees picking up the pesticides when foraging. The hazards of insecticidal application on flowering crops include direct mortality, fumigative effects, repellent effects and toxicity of the residues present on various floral parts and in nectar (Pal et al. 2015) [6]. 2. Materials and Methods An extensive research work was conducted in order to collect the information pertaining to different aspects of the present investigation entitled Impact of honey bee (Apis mellifera) pollination in mustard (Brassica campastris var. toria) to enhancement of seed yield. The investigation was carried out during Rabi, 2016-17 at Student Instructional Farm, Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology Kumarganj, Faizabad (U.P.) India. ~ 2563 ~

On the Faizabad Road at the distance of 42 km away from Faizabad district. The method of various experiments conducted as pre objectives are presented here as under. The visit of different pollinators and their number on flowers were recorded on randomly selected 5 plants for 5 minutes each in forenoon (9-10 AM) noon (12-1:00) and afternoon (3-4 PM) in open- pollination crop (OP). 2.1 Abundance of pollinators on mustard To quantify the insect pollinators, the regular visual observations of pollinators number were recorded on flowers in open-pollinated plots (OP) of the mustard crop during flowering period (15 to 30 December, 2016-17) at the Student Instructional Farm, Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad and presented in the Table-1. Several insect pollinators were found during observation period. The pollinators visited on the mustard flowers were belonging to the orders Diptera, Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera. Among them the house fly (order: Diptera) were most dominating pollinators besides, honey bee (Hymenoptera). The insects of order Hymenoptera contributed major group of pollinators on mustard crop. Among them Apis dorsata Fab. and Apis mellifera L. was dominating insects of genus-apis Besides, Trigona iridipennis of same family i.e. Apidae. However, House fly, syrphid flies of Diptera and butter fly of Lepidoptera were also observed in open- pollinated crop. Table 1: Abundance of insect pollinators on mustard crop during flowering period at Student Instructional Farm, Kumarganj, Faizabad, during 2016-17 S. No. Common name Scientific name Order Family 1 Rock bee Apis dorsata Fab. Hymenoptera Apidae 2 Italian bee Apis mellifera L. Hymenoptera Apidae 3 Dammer bee Trigona iridipennis Hymenoptera Apidae 4 House fly Musca domestica Diptera Muscidae 5 Syrphid flies Unidentify Diptera Syrphidae 6 Butterflies Unidentify Lepidoptera - 7 Moths Unidentify Lepidoptera - 2.2 Abundance and Quantification of the pollinators The relative abundance and quantification of recorded pollinators were presented in Table-2 and Fig.1. The result showed that honey bees were dominating among total pollinators population. Among honey bees, A. dorsata was dominating species with 7.25 bees / plant / 5 min which was 12.01 percent of total insect pollinators of forenoon (9.00-10.00 AM) whereas, it was 12.83 percent of total population in afternoon (3.00 to 4.00) with 8.93 bees /plant/ 5 min. and minimum population of pollinators 5.87 bee/ plant/ min recorded in noon (12-1.00). However, population of A. dorsata was ranged from 3 to 13 bee/plant/5 min. in forenoon, 3 to 16 bee/plant/5 max. in afternoon and 3 to 9 bee/plant/5min. in noon (12-1.00) during whole observation period. In case of A. mellifera foraging activity was higher in the afternoon (3.00 to 4.00 PM) with 7.16 bees/plant/5 min population, in respect to forenoon (9.00-10.00 AM) with 5.62 bees /plant /5 min which was 9.70 percent total pollinators and 3.75 bees/plant/5min. population observed in noon (12-1.00 PM). Dammer bee (Trigona irridipennis) was also recorded visiting on mustard flowers which population was recorded poor in comparison to others spp. of honeybee. Their population was observed highest in the afternoon (3.00-4.00 PM) 5.2 bees / plant / 5 min and 8.30 percent, forenoon (9.00-10.00AM) which recorded as 5.0 bees / plant / 5 min, 5 bees /plant/min. in noon (12-1.00 AM) 8.58 percent of total population. House fly (Musca domestica) population was recorded on mustard flowers which population was lower in comparison to syrphid flies. The house fly was observed lowest in forenoon (9.00 to 10.00 AM) 2.93 house fly /plant /5 min, afternoon (3.00 to 4.00 PM) and 3.43 bees/ plant /5min in noon (12-1.00PM) which recorded as 5.77 percent of total population. Fig 1: Quantification of different insect pollinators during flowering stage on mustard crop during season 2016-17. ~ 2564 ~

Table 2: Quantification of different insect pollinators during flowering stage on mustard crop during season 2016-17 The average number of pollinators per plant/5 min. Days Date Fore-noon (9-10 AM) Noon (12-1:00 PM) After-noon (3.00-4.00 PM) A.d A.m T. I H.f S.f Other Total A.d A.m T.I Hf S.f Other Total A.d A.m TI Hf Sf Other Total 1 15/12/16 7 6 6 4 7 2 32 4 4 6 3 7 0 24 8 8 3 4 5 1 29 2 16/12/16 6 7 7 5 3 0 28 8 5 3 5 6 2 29 9 12 5 6 4 1 37 3 17/12/16 5 8 3 3 6 2 27 4 3 5 4 7 1 25 7 10 3 3 5 0 28 4 18/12/16 9 9 4 4 5 1 32 7 6 8 2 5 1 22 10 12 6 7 4 2 41 5. 19/12/16 8 8 3 8 6 1 34 5 5 9 6 7 0 32 11 10 3 9 9 1 43 6. 20/12/16 9 10 5 5 9 1 39 7 8 7 5 4 1 31 13 12 13 5 10 3 56 7. 21/12/16 11 6 8 2 10 2 39 9 4 3 4 7 0 27 12 8 7 6 11 2 46 8. 22/12/16 7 5 4 1 3 1 20 5 3 5 1 4 0 18 8 7 4 3 8 1 31 9. 23/12/16 8 4 6 4 4 3 29 7 3 7 3 7 1 28 10 5 7 5 12 1 40 10. 24/12/16 13 4 9 2 7 2 37 9 3 5 6 9 2 34 16 4 4 3 8 1 36 11. 25/12/16 7 3 11 1 4 1 27 6 2 4 8 6 1 27 9 5 6 0 5 0 25 12 26/12/16 9 3 6 2 4 0 24 8 1 6 3 7 1 21 11 5 3 2 2 0 23 13. 27/12/16 5 4 2 0 1 2 14 4 2 2 1 3 0 11 8 6 5 0 4 1 24 14. 28/12/16 3 3 3 1 2 0 12 3 2 5 3 6 1 20 6 4 4 0 1 0 15 15. 29/12/16 4 6 2 2 0 1 15 6 4 3 2 4 0 19 3 7 2 1 0 0 13 16. 30/12/16 5 4 1 3 1 2 16 9 5 2 1 2 1 20 5 6 3 1 2 1 18 Mean 7.25 5.62 5.00 2.93 4.50 1.31 26.56 5.87 3.75 5.0 3.43 5.43 0.75 24.25 8.93 7.16 5.31 3.43 5.00 0.93 31.56 Percentage 12.03 9.32 8.30 4.86 7.47 2.17 8.87 5.68 7.57 5.69 8.22 1.13 17.6 14.12 9.86 6.76 7.20 1.83 % (fore-noon, noon and afternoon) 12.83 9.70 8.58 5.77 7.63 1.71 A.d = Apis dorsata, A.m = Apis mellifera, T.I = Trigona iridipennis, HF = House fly, SF = Syrphid fly. ~ 2565 ~

The foraging activities of syrphid flies on mustard were started in the morning hours. Its population was observed more (4.5 Syrphid flies / plant / 5 min and 7.47 percent) in the afternoon (3.00-4.00 PM) in respect to forenoon (9.00-10.00 AM) with 2.93 Syrphid flies / plant / 5 min and 7.63 percent. In forenoon it ranged from 1 to 10 flies / plant / 5 min and in the afternoon it ranged from 0 to 11 flies / plant / 5 min. the maximum population recorded ranged from 2 to 9 bees /plant /5 min. The other pollinators like as butter fly and moth were also recorded on mustard flowers. Their activity observed more in the afternoon (3.00 to 4.00 PM) with 1.31 Pollinators /plant/5 min. and 2.17 percent compared to forenoon (9.00 to 10.00AM) with 0.93 Pollinators / plant /5 min. and 1.71 percent of total population. 3. Result and Discussion Different pollinators visited the mustard flowers during the present investigation at the student instructional farm, Kumarganj, Faizabad. The insects of order- hymenoptera namely; Apis dorsata, Apis mellifera, T. irridipennis were the major floral visitors belonging to family Apidae. The insects among this apidae family, Apis dorsata and A. mellifera were the most frequent visitors. Becides, Musca domestica and syrphid flies of order Diptera, butterflies and moths of Lepidoptera and other unidentify insects were also visited on the crop at flowering period. This is a partial agreement with the findings similarly, Ahmad and Srivastava (2002) [1] recorded eleven species of Hymenoptera viz.: Apis cerana indica, A. dorsata, A. florea, A. mellifera, Xylocopa fenestrata, Halictus viridisima, Megachile femorata, Cressoniella relata, Cressoniella carbonaria, Cressoniella anthracina and Chalicodoma lanatum. A. dorsata was not observed visiting the flowers of the early cultivars. A. florea was less active during the pre-winter months, but was most active on late cultivars in the post-winter period. X. fenestrata was also absent during the pre-winter months. The Cressoniella species were active during the pre-winter months, but were absent during the post-winter months on late cultivars. Chalicodoma lanata was more active in earlier than on late cultivars. Anonymous (2013, 2014 and 2015) [2-5] observed maximum number of pollinators in the afternoon followed by forenoon. The less sunshine hours or cloudy weather in day hours restricted the pollinators visit Stanley et al., (2013) [9] observed the effect of the temperature, relative humidity and sunlight on the activity of visits of pollinators at 10:00 AM until 01:00 PM and this period can be characterized by higher sunlight and temperature with lower relative humidity periods. Kapkoti, et al., (2016) [6] recorded various meteorological factors influenced the foraging activities of A. cerana significantly temperature showed positive relationship with foraging behaviour of honeybee. On the other hand, relative humidity showed non-significant negative relationship. The present studies revealed that the abundance of insect pollinators were found maximum at 3.00-4.00 PM (Afternoon) with 31.56 pollinators /plant /5 min. followed by 8.93, 7.16, 5.0, 3.43, 5.31, and 0.93 pollinators /plant /5 min. in respect to forenoon (9.00-10.00 AM), 26.25 pollinators/plant 5 min., recorded as 24.25 pollinators/plant/5min. in noon (12-1.00 PM) 5.87, 3.75,5.00 3.43, 5.43 and 0.75 pollinators / plant /5 min respectively. The higher number of floral visitors in the evening can be attributed of favourable abiotic parameters of afternoon. Among the one species of honey bees, A. dorsats started foraging earlier followed by A. mellifera and weather factors also influenced the foraging activity of honey bees. Similar results were reported by Rath and Sihag (1993) [8] revealed that the honey bee species were more active from 11.00 h to 14.00 h, whereas, the solitary bees were more active later (12.00 to 15.00 h). Anonymous (2013, 2014 and 2015) observed maximum number of pollinators was 47.1 pollnators/plant/5 min in afternoon in respect to forenoon was 46.89 pollnators/plant/5 min. 4. Conclusion The foraging activity of all Apis sp were varied from species to species at different day. The maximum average number of A. dorsata was noticed at 3.00 to 4.00 PM which decreased in the forenoon 9.00 to 10.00 AM and A. mellifera was maximum noticed at 3.00 to 4.00 PM with 14.1 foragers / plant / 5 min, which decreased in the forenoon 9.3 bee / plant / 5 min. and minimum population were recorded minimum in comparison to afternoon and forenoon respectively. Similarly, in case of Trigona irridepennis the foraging activity was maximum in the afternoon at 3.00 to 4.00 PM) with 5.2 bees / plant / 5 min, respectively. The foraging activities in both bees were lower in forenoon at 9.00 to 10.00 AM. With 9.3 and 3.7 bees/plant/5min. The number of syrphid flies gradually increased in the afternoon 3.00 to 4.00PM. (4.7 flies /plant /5 min). However, the number of the syrphid fly population was less recorded at 9.00 to 10.00AM (3.7 flies / Plant /5 min.) similarly, observation was recorded in case of house fly. 5. Acknowledgement The authors are thankful to the Department of Agricultural Entomology, NDUA&T Kumarganj, Faizabad for providing necessary facilities for conducting the investigation and valuable suggestions during the course of investigation. 6. Reference 1. Ahmad R, Srivastava DP. Relative visitation of Hymenopterans bees to rapeseed. Indian Journal of oilseeds Research. 2002; 15(2):203. 2. Anonymous. Annual Report, A.I.C.R.P.; National Seed Project (Crop), 2012-2013. ICAR-Directorate of Seed Kushmaur, Mau-275103 (U.P), 2013. 3. Anonymous. Annual Progress Report AICRP Rapseed- Msustard. Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research: Bharatpur-321-303 (Raj.), India, 2013-14. 4. Anonymous. Annual Report, A.I.C.R.P.; National Seed Project (Crop), 2013-2014. ICAR-Directorate of Seed Kushmaur, Mau-275103 (U.P.), 2014. 5. Anonymous. Annual Report, A.I.C.R.P.; National Seed Project (Crop), 2014-2015. ICAR-Directorate of Seed Kushmaur, Mau-275103 (U.P.), 2015. 6. Kapkoti B, Rawal RS, Joshi RK. Insect pollinators of Brassica campestris in Kumaun, West Himalaya: influence of crop composition, altitude and flowering phenology. National Academy Science Letter. 2016; 39(5):389-394. 7. Pal S, Singh DK, Kumar S, Shekhawat CS, Kumar D. Seasonal abundance of insect-pests on mustard varieties (Brassica spp.) and relation to abiotic factors. Annals of Biology. 2015; 31(1):109-112. 8. Rathi A, Sihag RC. Differential attractiveness of Brassica ~ 2566 ~

campestris L. and [Cajanus cajan L. (Millsp.)] to two honey bee species. Pollination in tropics: Proceedings of the International Symposium on pollination in tropics, Bangalore; India. 1993, 113-119. 9. Stanley DA, Gunning D, Stout JC. Pollinators and pollination of oilseed rape crops (Brassica napus L.) in Ireland: ecological and economic in centives for pollinator conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation. 2013; 17(6):1181-1189. ~ 2567 ~