New Mexico Geological Society

Similar documents
New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

THE HISTORY AND PERFORMANCE OF VERTICAL WELL SOLUTION MINING OF NAHCOLITE (NaHCO 3 ) IN THE PICEANCE BASIN, NORTHWESTERN COLORADO, USA

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

SOLUTION MINING OF NAHCOLITE AT THE AMERICAN SODA PROJECT, PICEANCE CREEK, COLORADO. M. Hardy Agapito Assocs., Inc. Grand Junction, CO

GIS-based Water Resource Geospatial Infrastructure for Oil Shale Development

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

Dawsonite breakdown reactions during pyrolysis in Green River Formation oil shale

Water use estimate 2014 National Oil Shale Association March 2014 Background New information

Stephanie B. Gaswirth and Kristen R. Mara

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

Cuyama Basin North Fork Vineyard

Soils, Hydrogeology, and Aquifer Properties. Philip B. Bedient 2006 Rice University

APPENDIX C GEOLOGICAL CHANCE OF SUCCESS RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

BUREAU OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS,

New Mexico Geological Society

SL GEOLOGY AND MINING. Coal bearing strata in the project area are referable primarily to the Allegheny Group of

Novel Application in Determining Oil Shale Porosity Using a Borehole Gravimeter

Lower Skinner Valley Fill Sandstones: Attractive Exploration Targets on the Northeast Oklahoma Platform*

THIS IS A NEW SPECIFICATION

The Kingfisher Field, Uganda - A Bird in the Hand! S R Curd, R Downie, P C Logan, P Holley Heritage Oil plc *

Challenge of Mae Sot Oil Shale Exploration in Thailand (In the First Phase, 2008) Apichart Jeennagol Apiradee Suwannathong

Subsurface Geology and Resource Exploration

Cretaceous, Dakota Formation, Terra Cotta Member South Side of I-70, Salina County, Kansas

Risk Factors in Reservoir Simulation

Oil Shale Resource in Mae Sot Basin, Thailand

Coal Loss and Dilution Considerations for Western Canadian Foothills Open Pit Coal Projects

For personal use only

New Mexico Geological Society

Core Description, Stratigraphic Correlation, and Mapping of Pennsylvanian Strata in the Appalachians

Structural Geology Lab. The Objectives are to gain experience

Bulletin of Earth Sciences of Thailand. Evaluation of the Petroleum Systems in the Lanta-Similan Area, Northern Pattani Basin, Gulf of Thailand

THIS IS A NEW SPECIFICATION

THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND ENERGY INDUSTRIES MINERALS DIVISION MINE DESIGN TEMPLATE OPERATOR NAME: OPERATOR ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FACSIMILE:

REPORT OF INVESTIGATION NO. 37 UTAH GEOLOGICAL AND MINERALOGICAL SURVEY

Risk Assessment in the Quality Control of Oil Shale in Estonian Deposit. Sergei Sabanov

Environmental Aspects of Oil Shale Development: A Review

New Mexico Geological Society

5.11 MINERAL RESOURCES

Utah s s Oil Shale Deposits: Stratigraphy and Resource Evaluation

Geology Merit Badge Workbook

GREEN RIVER OIL SHALE POTENTIAL IN UTAH

SIXTH SCHEDULE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM, MINING THE MINING (MINERAL TITLE) REGULATIONS 2015

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

New Mexico Geological Society

Introduction Geology

UNIQUE MINERALOGY OF OIL SHALE FROM THE PICEANCE BASIN, COLORADO

Shallow Karst Aquifer System of the Lake Belt Study Area, Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA EXTENDED ABSTRACT

FIELD MONITORING OF STABILITY OF DUMP A CASE STUDY

THE STRUCTURE AND THICKNESS OF THE CLINTON AND BEREA FORMATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF WOOSTER, OHIO

An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations

PRINCETON BASIN (92H/7E, 8W. 9W, 10E)

SAND DISTRIBUTION AND RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS NORTH JAMJUREE FIELD, PATTANI BASIN, GULF OF THAILAND

Surface Processes Focus on Mass Wasting (Chapter 10)

For personal use only

P.R. SPRING AND HILL CREEK TAR SAND AREAS A RESOURCE ASSESSMENT (IN PROGRESS)

F794. GEOLOGY Environmental Geology ADVANCED GCE. Friday 10 June 2011 Afternoon

Curriculum Support Maps for the Study of Indiana Coal

Tuesday 6 June 2017 Afternoon

The headwaters of Blacklegs Creek originate near Parkwood in Indiana County

An outcrop analogue for the Williston Basin Bakken hybrid play, the Sappington Formation in southwest Montana:

For personal use only

New Mexico Geological Society

New Mexico Geological Society

MAssAwA GOLD project 2.7Moz Randgold ResouRces

Basin-wide Evaluation of the Uppermost Green River Formation s s Oil-Shale Resource, Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado

Oposura Scoping Study Nearing Completion

Lowmead Oil Shale Deposit. Resource Estimate Update

A STATIC 3D MODELING OF HYDROCARBONIC RESERVOIR WITH THE HELP OF RMS CASE study: THE SOUTH EAST ANTICLINE OF KHUZESTAN IRAN

Monday 2 June 2014 Morning

Structural Geology Lab. The Objectives are to gain experience

COAU PROPERTY LEMHI COUNTY, IDAHO

Case Study: University of Connecticut (UConn) Landfill

OTC OTC PP. Abstract

Atico Mining Provides Exploration Update

New Mexico Geological Society

For personal use only

Dakota Sandstone. of the Moxa Arch and Surrounding Green River Basin

Resource Classification Systems by Dan Alexander

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 114 (2017 )

EAS 233 Geologic Structures and Maps Winter Miscellaneous practice map exercises. 1. Fault and separation:

Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Test

STEP-OUT DRILLING EXTENDS HIGH GRADE COPPER ZONE AT SYNDICATED S 100% BARBARA SOUTH LODE

Introducti on. Land Survey. Geomagnetic Survey. Geomagnetic Results and Interpretati ons - Conclusions and Recommendations C

WESTCARB Phase I Results Review

!'f \, w. Alan Stewart Colorado Exploration Company, Golden STRUCTURE OF THE FOOTHILLS AREA WEST OF DENVER, COLORADO. Introduction

MARKET UPDATE ON URANIUM AND GOLD PROJECTS

NOA ASSESSMENT HARRIS QUARRY MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Relinquishment Report for Licence Number P1356, Block 48/8c March 2008

New Mexico Geological Society

Transcription:

New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Rio Blanco Oil Shale Company Tract C-a, Rio Blanco County, Colorado: Summary of geology and current development E. A. Ziemba, 1981, pp. 211-218 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32 nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States. No material from the NMGS website, or printed and electronic publications, may be reprinted or redistributed without NMGS permission. Contact us for permission to reprint portions of any of our publications. One printed copy of any materials from the NMGS website or our print and electronic publications may be made for individual use without our permission. Teachers and students may make unlimited copies for educational use. Any other use of these materials requires explicit permission.

This page is intentionally left blank to maintain order of facing pages.

New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 32nd Field Conference, Western Slope Colorado, 1981 211 RIO BLANCO OIL SHALE COMPANY TRACT C-a, RIO BLANCO COUNTY, COLORADO: SUMMARY OF GEOLOGY AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENT E. A. ZIEMBA Rio Blanco Oil Shale Company Aurora, Colorado 80014 STRATIGRAPHY A generalized stratigraphic column of Tertiary Eocene rocks in the Piceance Creek basin is shown in Figure 1. The column makes no attempt to maintain vertical scale representative of individual stratigraphic unit thicknesses. Its primary function is to portray the relative stratigraphic positions of the basin's major and minor Eocene units, the position of the basin's main oil-shale interval within the Parachute Creek Member, Green River Formation, and the oil-shale interval as defined at Tract C-a. Also shown are key markers, both lithologic and electric log, which are important in oil-shale stratigraphic correlations. Figure 2 is a southwest-northeast stratigraphic cross section across Tract C-a utilizing oil-grade logs of three of the 27 coreholes drilled on the tract. It is oriented approximately normal to depositional or isopach strike of the main oil-shale interval of the Parachute Creek Member. The section portrays the tract's principal stratigraphic oil-shale characteristics, including the positions of four key electric log markers (A- and B- grooves, Blue and Orange markers) and two key lithologic markers (Mahogany marker and Mahogany bed). These six stratigraphic markers are not only areally persistent within Tract C-a but also throughout most of the Piceance Creek basin. The oil-shale zonation established by Rio Blanco Oil Shale Company within Tract C-a also is shown on the cross section of Figure 2. It is based on a zonation first established by the U.S. Geological Survey within the main oil-shale interval (A-groove to Blue marker) on a regional scale. The Rio Blanco zonation expands that of the U.S. Geological Survey stratigraphically above and below the main oil-shale interval resulting in 19 discrete oil-shale zones; 9 relatively rich and 10 relatively lean. These zones are designated L-00 through L-8 in stratigraphically ascending order with the alternating rich and lean zones identified "R" and "L", respectively. However, the Mahogany and A-groove (AG) zonal nomenclature is retained because of their well-established usage. STRUCTURE The regional setting of Tract C-a within the Piceance Creek basin is shown in Figure 3. The tract (approximately 5,100 acres) is situated on the basin's west flank where regional dip is basinward generally to the east and northeast. Figure 4 portrays Tract C-a structure based on photogeologic mapping, surface geologic mapping and subsurface corehole and well control. The horizon mapped is the middle of the A-groove, the key electric log marker immediately above the Mahogany zone shown on the cross section of Figure 2 (corehole CE 702 log). In general, beds within the tract strike to the north and northwest and dip gently basinward to the east and northeast at slopes of 2-4 (37-66 m/km) except where locally disturbed by folds and faults. The structural framework of Tract C-a is dominated by the lowrelief southeast-plunging Sulfur Creek anticlinal nose and three en echelon grabens (fault systems) on its northeast flank. The trends of these grabens are all parallel or subparallel to the Sulfur Creek anticlinal axis. The northernmost graben is the most structurally complex of the three with up to 71 m of displacement mapped at the surface where it crosses Corral Gulch. Several minor folds and subsidiary faults complete the structural framework. All faults thus far mapped are high angle to vertical. RESOURCES A total of 27 coreholes have been drilled on Tract C-a to define its resources. Combined, these coreholes have yielded some 9900 m of core. Shale Oil The entire oil-shale interval underlying Tract C-a (L-8 zone through L-00 zone of Figure 2) increases in both thickness and grade across the tract basinward to the northeast. It averages 370

BA

RIO BLANCO OIL COMPANY TRACT C-a 215 m in thickness and 20.5 G/T oil in grade, and contains 9.1 billion barrels of shale oil in place. Overburden atop this interval averages 102 m in thickness. To put that shale grade into some perspective, a block of 20.5 G/T shale the size of an average office desk weighs 3.2 tons (2900 kg) and contains about 1.6 barrels of shale oil. In more familiar oil-field terminology, 20.5 G/T is equivalent to about 1,500 barrels of oil per acre-foot. Of the total in-place resource of 9.1 billion barrels, about 80 percent, or 7.3 billion barrels, are contained within the main oil-shale interval (Mahogany through R-2 zones of Figure 2). This interval averages 270 m in thickness and 23.2 G/T in grade with an average overburden thickness of 144 m. Recoverable shale oil at Tract C-a is highly dependent upon the method of development applied. Three methods have been considered by Rio Blanco Oil Shale Co., namely open-pit mining, underground mining (multi-level, room and pillar) and modified in situ. With a total in-place resource of 9.1 billion barrels, estimated recoveries for each of the three methods are as follows: R e c o v e r a b l e R e c o v e r y M e t h o d ( B i l l. B b l s ) F a c t o r ( 5 6 ) O p e n - P i t M i n i n g 5. 2 5 7 U n d e r g r o u n d M i n i n g 1. 1 1 2 M o d i f i e d I n S i t u ( M I S ) 1. 7-2. 5 1 9-27 Tract development by open-pit mining would exploit the total oil-shale interval present and result in a pit bottoming out at the base of the L-00 zone of Figure 2. Development by underground mining would be selectively confined to several of the richer oilshale zones shown on Figure 2. Tract developed by modified in situ methods (MIS) includes surface retorting of oil shale mined out in the preparation of underground retorts. The lower recovery values listed above reflect initial development of about the upper two-thirds of the total oilshale interval (top R-8 through base R-4 zones of Figure 2). The higher values include potential additional recoveries in a second phase of development in which the lower one-third of the total shale interval might be exploited. Of the three methods of development considered, open-pit mining clearly would result in the greatest shale-oil recovery at Tract C-a. This was the approach submitted in Rio Blanco's original 1976 detailed development plan. However, the plan called for off-tract lands for both the processing plant and spent-shale disposal. These lands were determined to be unavailable. MIS development of the tract offers the next best recource recovery and this is the approach now being pursued as outlined in our 1977 revised development plan. Dawsonite The mineral dawsonite [NaAl(OH),CO31, a potential source of alumina, is present within the tract's R-2 through R-5 zones (fig. 2). It occurs as microscopic crystals finely disseminated throughout the oil shale and as thin laminations along bedding planes. About 360 million tons of dawsonite are estimated to be present under Tract C-a, containing about 125 million tons of alumina. Recoverable dawsonite has yet to be determined. Nahcolite The mineral nahcolite (NaHCO,), a potential source of soda ash, is present within the tract in very minor amounts scattered throughout several of the oil-shale zones. It occurs as thin beds, stringers, nodules and crystal coatings on vug walls and on shale partings. Most of the nahcolite originally deposited within Tract C-a has been subsequently removed by groundwater leaching (dissolution). Its current very limited presence precludes its designation as a significant tract resource. DEVELOPMENT Rio Blanco Oil Shale Co. is currently in the modular development phase of MIS development of Tract C-a. The objectives of this phase are to gain operating experience, improve process efficiency and define capital and operating costs for a commercialsized operation, termed the commercial phase. This development program consists of the sequential preparation and burn of three relatively small MIS retorts, the third and largest of which is 18 m x 45 m x about 120 m high as presently designed. The burn of the last retort in this phase is scheduled for completion in early 1982. Total shale oil to be produced from these three retorts is estimated at about 50,000 barrels. In the commercial phase, somewhat larger MIS retorts are envisioned. Coupled with surface retorting of mined-out shale, production of 76,000 barrels of shale oil per day is tentatively scheduled. In basic terms, shale-oil production by the MIS method utilizes established mining methods to develop underground chambers whose function is essentially identical to conventional surface retorts. A fraction of each chamber's total contained shale volume is first drawn (excavated) to obtain a pre-designed void volume or porosity. The chamber's remaining shale volume is then fragmented by drilling and blasting. The resulting porous rubblized shale mass within the chamber is then retorted in place. Based on a recently completed extensive review of MIS technology, Rio Blanco has made substantial changes in its originally designed modular development program. Figure 5 is an isometric drawing which shows the previous program and its mine plan to develop and burn five relatively small MIS retorts. These retorts ranged in size from 9m x 9m x 42 m high to 30 m x 30 m x about 120 m high. An extensive mine network consisting of seven levels (A through G) was required to develop the five retorts. The current modular development program is shown in the isometric drawing of Figure 6. This new program reduces the number of MIS retorts from five to three and the number of mine levels to prepare and burn them from seven to two. In the current modular development program, the preparation and burn of the three retorts is actually accomplished from both the mine and the surface. The drawn or excavated fraction of each retort is removed via the mine's G Level. The remaining fraction is then rubblized using blastholes drilled from the surface. Retort burn is initiated by a downhole burner lowered to the top of the retort from the surface. Fluids produced from each retort are conveyed via G Level for pumping to the surface. Sub-E Level surrounds the three MIS retorts and serves as a drainage gallery for upper aquifer groundwater. This level is positioned just below the base of the upper aquifer and longholes drilled from it upward into the aquifer are designed to dewater the entire three-retort area. The level's objective is to virtually "dry out" the retort line and prevent any upper aquifer water from flowing into the retorts to preclude their burn. As previously described, the currently planned commerical phase of Tract C-a development consists of shale-oil production from both MIS retorting (underground) and surface retorting. Even if MIS retorting is successful, an efficient surface retorting method is needed to process the substantial quantities of oil shale mined out during the preparation of large-scale MIS retorts. Should MIS retorting be unsuccessful for any reason, then an efficient surface

RIO BLANCO OIL COMPANY TRACT C-a retorting process is still critical as an integral part of alternative methods of tract development (open-pit or underground mining). Optimum surface retorting is therefore critical to any commercial development of the tract. To determine the optimum surface retorting method for use at Tract C-a, Rio Blanco extensively reviewed several technologies and selected the Lurgi-Ruhrgas (L-R) process as the most promising. Planning is now underway for the construction of a 4,400 T/D L-R modular demonstration retort. Shale feed for the retort will be 217 provided from both the underground MIS mine and a small open pit located near the northwest corner of the tract. Lastly, the MIS method of shale-oil production on a commerical scale at Tract C-a has great potential but is recognized as risky at this point in time. Many questions related to its technical and economic feasibility require answers based on hard data. Rio Blanco Oil Shale Co. has committed over $90 million to the current modular development program to provide those answers.