Enrichment of r-process elements in nearby dsph galaxies, the Milky way, and globular cluster(s)

Similar documents
r-process enrichment traced by Pu and Ba near the sun and in the Draco

金属欠乏星の r プロセス元素組成. r-process abundance of metal-poor stars

Outline. Stellar Explosions. Novae. Death of a High-Mass Star. Binding Energy per nucleon. Nova V838Mon with Hubble, May Dec 2002

GALAXIES 626. The Milky Way II. Chemical evolution:

Chemo-Dynamical evolution of dwarf spheroidal galaxies

Supernova events and neutron stars

Short GRB and kilonova: did observations meet our theoretical predictions?

Mass loss from stars

r-process nucleosynthesis in neutron star mergers and associated macronovae events

R-process in Low Entropy Neutrino Driven Winds

II. Morphology and Structure of Dwarf Galaxies

Type II Supernovae Overwhelming observational evidence that Type II supernovae are associated with the endpoints of massive stars: Association with

This class: Life cycle of high mass stars Supernovae Neutron stars, pulsars, pulsar wind nebulae, magnetars Quark-nova stars Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)

Zoccali et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 931. Overview of (old) Galactic components. bulge, thick disk, metal-weak halo. metallicity & age distribution

Probing the Creation of the Heavy Elements in Neutron Star Mergers

Electromagne,c Counterparts of Gravita,onal Wave Events

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 29 Sep 2015

The Galactic Halo As Seen By The Hamburg/ESO Survey. Judy Cohen (Caltech)

Our Galaxy. Milky Way Galaxy = Sun + ~100 billion other stars + gas and dust. Held together by gravity! The Milky Way with the Naked Eye

Three Major Components

STELLAR HEAVY ELEMENT ABUNDANCES AND THE NATURE OF THE R-PROCESSR. JOHN COWAN University of Oklahoma

A1199 Are We Alone? " The Search for Life in the Universe

in the Milky NOW Way AND and THEN dwarf galaxies Stefania Salvadori

GRB history. Discovered 1967 Vela satellites. classified! Published 1973! Ruderman 1974 Texas: More theories than bursts!

Supernova Remnants and Cosmic. Rays

Supernova Feedback in Low and High Mass Galaxies: Luke Hovey 10 December 2009

Sound Waves Sound Waves:

Dust [12.1] Star clusters. Absorb and scatter light Effect strongest in blue, less in red, zero in radio.

Low-Energy Cosmic Rays

Supernovae. Supernova basics Supernova types Light Curves SN Spectra after explosion Supernova Remnants (SNRs) Collisional Ionization

THE GALACTIC BULGE AND ITS GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: MOS. B. Barbuy

Stellar Populations in the Galaxy

Supernovae. Supernova basics Supernova types Light Curves SN Spectra after explosion Supernova Remnants (SNRs) Collisional Ionization

Chapter 19 Reading Quiz Clickers. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Our Galaxy Pearson Education, Inc.

Superbubble Feedback in Galaxy Formation

Chapter 18 Reading Quiz Clickers. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. The Bizarre Stellar Graveyard Pearson Education, Inc.

Carbon Enhanced Metal Poor (CEMP) Stars and the Halo System of the Milky Way

Motivation Q: WHY IS STAR FORMATION SO INEFFICIENT? Ṁ M gas / dyn. Log SFR. Kennicutt Log. gas / dyn

Galactic Projects at ESO Disk and halo. Birgitta Nordström Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Denmark

PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

Gamma-Ray Astronomy. Astro 129: Chapter 1a

The HERMES project. Reconstructing Galaxy Formation. Ken Freeman RSAA, ANU. The metallicity distribution in the Milky Way discs Bologna May 2012

Milky Way Satellite Galaxies with DES

Active Galaxies. Lecture Topics. Lecture 24. Active Galaxies. Potential exam topics. What powers these things? Lec. 24: Active Galaxies

Basics of Galactic chemical evolution

The Universe of Galaxies: from large to small. Physics of Galaxies 2012 part 1 introduction

Number of Stars: 100 billion (10 11 ) Mass : 5 x Solar masses. Size of Disk: 100,000 Light Years (30 kpc)

Thermonuclear shell flashes II: on WDs (or: classical novae)

Abundance Constraints on Early Chemical Evolution. Jim Truran

Magnetic Fields in Astrophysics: Origins and Evolution. Kinwah Wu Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London

Notes for Wednesday, July 16; Sample questions start on page 2 7/16/2008

Ehsan Moravveji. WR124: A stellar fireball (HST WFPC2, NASA) Credit: Grosdidier (Uni. Montreal, CA)

Protostars evolve into main-sequence stars

Short-lived 244 Pu points to compact binary mergers as sites for heavy r-process nucleosynthesis

Lecture 30. The Galactic Center

Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event Golden Gate Invitational February 11, 2017

The Death of Stars. Today s Lecture: Post main-sequence (Chapter 13, pages ) How stars explode: supernovae! White dwarfs Neutron stars

Physics HW Set 3 Spring 2015

Learning Objectives: Chapter 13, Part 1: Lower Main Sequence Stars. AST 2010: Chapter 13. AST 2010 Descriptive Astronomy

The Great Debate: The Size of the Universe (1920)

Lecture 11: Ages and Metalicities from Observations A Quick Review

Chapter 15 The Milky Way Galaxy. The Milky Way

Basics of chemical evolution

Galaxy Formation: Overview

ON THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY. The Metallicity distribution of the halo in the hierarchical merging paradigm

Exam # 3 Tue 12/06/2011 Astronomy 100/190Y Exploring the Universe Fall 11 Instructor: Daniela Calzetti

Multiwavelength observation campaign of Mrk 509: UV spectra of the X-ray Outflow!!!!Gerard Kriss!! STScI!!! (with N. Arav, J. Kaastra & the Mrk 509

Short Gamma-ray Bursts: Lessons Learned, Open Questions, and Constraints for the GW Era

Nucleosynthesis in heliumenriched

Friday, April 29, 2011

The magnetic properties of Main Sequence Stars, White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars

Stellar Populations: Resolved vs. unresolved

Interpretation of Early Bursts

Implications of GW observations for short GRBs

Cosmic Rays, Photons and Neutrinos

SN1987A before(right) and during the explosion. Supernova Explosion. Qingling Ni

Substructure in the Galaxy

Transient Events from Neutron Star Mergers

Astr 5465 March 6, 2018 Abundances in Late-type Galaxies Spectra of HII Regions Offer a High-Precision Means for Measuring Abundance (of Gas)

Comparing a Supergiant to the Sun

Starburst Dwarf Galaxies

Formation of Galactic Halo Globular Clusters through Self-Enrichment

Robert Izzard Université Libre de Bruxelles

The electrons then interact with the surrounding medium, heat it up, and power the light curve. 56 Ni 56 Co + e (1.72 MeV) half life 6.

High Energy Astrophysics

Life and Evolution of a Massive Star. M ~ 25 M Sun

Reminders! Observing Projects: Both due Monday. They will NOT be accepted late!!!

Radio Observations of TeV and GeV emitting Supernova Remnants

Astronomy Stars, Galaxies and Cosmology Exam 3. Please PRINT full name

The Star Clusters of the Magellanic Clouds

STARS. J. J. COWAN University of Oklahoma

The Milky Way Galaxy

Radio Flares from Neutron Star merges + More Tsvi Piran

Einführung in die Astronomie II

MIDTERM #2. ASTR 101 General Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies. Can we detect BLACK HOLES? Black Holes in Binaries to the rescue. Black spot in the sky?

Nuclear Astrophysics

Astronomy 422! Lecture 7: The Milky Way Galaxy III!

Galactic Bulge Science

14/11/2018. L Aquila - Multi-messenger studies of NS mergers, GRBs and magnetars. Simone Dall Osso

Stellar Explosions (ch. 21)

Transcription:

Enrichment of r-process elements in nearby dsph galaxies, the Milky way, and globular cluster(s) Toshikazu Shigeyama (U. Tokyo) Based on Tsujimoto & TS 2014

Kilonova Afterglow of GRB130603B at day 9! Berger+ 13, Tanvir+ 13! NIR detection! Absolute Magnitude 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 H i r g Magellan/Gemini Kilonova (M =0.1, v =0.2c) ej ej Kilonova (M =0.01, v =0.2c) ej ej Afterglow (F t 2.6 ) ν HST SN2006aj no detection of optical band 8 10 1 10 0 10 1 Rest Frame Time (d)

Kilonova Afterglow of GRB130603B at day 9! Berger+ 13, Tanvir+ 13! NIR detection! no detection of optical band

Kilonova Time since GRB 130603B (d) 21 1 10 X-ray 10 11 Afterglow of GRB130603B at day 9! Berger+ 13, Tanvir+ 13! NIR detection! AB magnitude 22 23 24 25 26 F606W F160W 10 12 10 13 X-ray flux (erg s 1 cm 2 ) 27 no detection of optical band 28 10 14 29 10 4 10 5 Time since GRB 130603B (s) 10 6

Summary of Kilonova short GRB is a result of neutron star merger (NSM)! 1.ejects r-process rich matter! 2.Mass~0.01 M! 3.speeds~>0.1c! 1 & 2 motivate us to revisit NSM as a major production site of r- process elements

Transfer properties The speed of ejecta = 0.1-0.3c (γ=1.010-1.099)! Stopping length!! l S ~ 400 kpc v 0.2c 2 A 153 Z eff 63 2 n 1 Fe (from SN): ls ~0.1/n kpc! Most of ejecta escape from a galaxy?

Effects of magnetic fields If B~1 #G! rg ~2 10 15 cm<<size of a galaxy! r-process elements propagate along B fields (kinetic pressure<<magnetic pressure)! Structure of B decides the dissipation of kinetic energy of r-process elements! turbulent B may stop r-process elements through ionizations! r-process elements pervade the entire proto-galactic cloud (with some leakage)

Transfer properties The speed of ejecta = 0.1-0.3c (γ=1.010-1.099)! Energy per nucleon =m u c 2 (γ-1)=10-100 MeV/A! If 0.3c, then spallation occurs before traveling through the stopping length! If 0.1c, then below the threshold energy

r-process elements in extremely metal-poor stars(emp stars) in the Milky Way Large dispersion in [Eu/Fe]! Supernova supplies ~0.1 M Fe! SNR sweeps and mixes ISM of mass ~10 5 M : [Fe/H]~-3! Assume that stars are formed in the swept up gas From SAGA (Suda+ 08)

r-process elements in EMP stars in ~7/n Myr after a NS merger! r-process elements could be uniformly distributed! concentration of r-process elements is determined by the cloud mass! How much fraction is trapped inside the cloud is unknown (Assume 100% here)! High(Low) [r-process/fe] low (high) cloud mass! EMP stars were formed in gas swept up by individual SNe! Fe abundance is determined by the SN+ISM

Chemical evolution model Fe is mixed in a shell swept up by a SNR (the mass~10 5 M )! r-process elements diffuse over the entire proto-galactic cloud.! NSM rate: Eu/H-Fe/H relation in massive dsphs! Chemical evolution in clouds with different masses! Blue: ~10 9 M! Red: 107-2 10 7 M! [Eu/Fe] Green: 5 105, 2 10 6 M (with a few NSM events) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0-0.5-1 -1.5-4 -3-2 -1 0 [Fe/H]

Chemical evolution model Fe is mixed in a shell swept up by a SNR (the mass~10 5 M )! Cannot rule out NSM as the origin of r-process elements. r-process elements diffuse over the entire proto-galactic cloud.! NSM rate: Eu/H-Fe/H relation in massive dsphs! Chemical evolution in clouds with different masses! Blue: ~10 9 M! Red: 107-2 10 7 M! [Eu/Fe] Green: 5 105, 2 10 6 M (with a few NSM events) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0-0.5-1 -1.5-4 -3-2 -1 0 [Fe/H]

A few comments on faint dsphs

r-process elements in dsphs Ultra Faint dsphs no evolution or sudden increase of Eu in small mass dsphs! Eu/H independent of the masses of dsphs! dsph masses are small! Suppose NSM supplies Eu! [Eu/H] 0.5 0-0.5-1 -1.5-2 Draco faint dsph Sculptor Carina very few NSM events! a small fraction of Eu were trapped (High velocity!) -2.5 Fulbright+07-3 -3-2.5-2 -1.5-1 -0.5 Eu H X Eu M ej X H M cl [Fe/H] R l S X M Eu ej R 2 X H

r-process elements in dsphs Suppose SNe supply Eu in Draco! Ultra Faint dsphs [Fe/H]=-2.3 requires ~500 SNe! 0.5 0 faint dsph The mass of the protogalactic cloud~10 7 M (L~2 10 5 L )! [Eu/H] -0.5-1 -1.5-2 Draco Sculptor Carina No enrichment in Eu/H by the subsequent 2500 SNe! -2.5 Fulbright+07-3 -3-2.5-2 -1.5-1 -0.5 [Fe/H] disfavors SNe as a source of r-process elements

r-process elements in globular cluster 1.4 1.6 b) M15(Otsuki+ 2011, Roederer 2013, Worley+ 2013)! massive and metal-poor ([Fe/H]~-2.3)! hosts some double pulsars! [La/H] 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 [Eu/H] variation in [Eu/H], [La/H], and [Ba/ H]! Worley+ 2013 no significant variation in [Fe/H]

Stellar surface polluted with NSM ejecta? 12 10 Red-giants with r-process excess! Possible scenario! Number 8 6 First star formation event! 4 all supernovae went off! all the gas component removed! 2 0-2.2-2 -1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2 less massive stars evolved to AGB and supplied gas! [Eu/H] NSM enriched the gas with r-process elements! still less massive dwarfs have accreted the r-process rich gas

some dwarfs become extremely r-process rich! the dwarfs evolved to red-giants to be observed! The distribution with respect to r-process elements becomes bimodal.

Summary Milky way halo! mixing of r-process elements different from heavy elements ejected by SNe! Eu/Fe determined by proto-galactic cloud mass! Milky way halo composed of stars formed in various proto-clouds with different masses

dsph galaxies! Discrete increases in Eu/H! Common plateau of Eu/H with increasing Fe/H prefers NSM but needs early occurrence(~10 Myr)! Globular cluster M15! Stars with different Eu/H ratios with the same Fe/H! apparently rule out SNe as the source of r-process! SNe that eject r-process elements always eject Fe