Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1

Similar documents
Coordinated conformational and compositional dynamics drive. ribosome translocation

James B. Munro, Roger B. Altman, Nathan O Connor, and Scott C. Blanchard

Accuracy of genetic code translation and its orthogonal corruption by aminoglycosides and Mg 2+ ions

Online Supplementary Material. Messenger RNA Interactions in the Decoding Center Control the Rate of Translocation

Jingyi Fei, Pallav Kosuri, Daniel D. MacDougall, and Ruben L. Gonzalez, Jr.

Reading the genetic code: The 3D version. Venki Ramakrishnan MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Cambridge, United Kingdom

Protein synthesis I Biochemistry 302. February 17, 2006

Codon choice and gene expression: Synonymous codons differ in translational accuracy

TWO PARTNERS OF THE RIBOSOME, EF-TU AND LEPA EVELINA INES DE LAURENTIIS. B.Sc. University of Lethbridge, A Thesis

BCH 4054 Spring 2001 Chapter 33 Lecture Notes

Proofreading neutralizes potential error hotspots in genetic code translation by transfer RNAs

A Uniform Response to Mismatches in Codon-Anticodon Complexes Ensures Ribosomal Fidelity

(Lys), resulting in translation of a polypeptide without the Lys amino acid. resulting in translation of a polypeptide without the Lys amino acid.

Ribosomal initiation complex-driven changes in the stability and dynamics of initiation factor 2 regulate the fidelity of translation initiation

Protein synthesis I Biochemistry 302. Bob Kelm February 23, 2004

Lecture 9 Translation.

Cell, Volume 153. Supplemental Information. The Ribosome as an Optimal Decoder: A Lesson in Molecular Recognition. Yonatan Savir and Tsvi Tlusty

ومن أحياها Translation 2. Translation 2. DONE BY :Nisreen Obeidat

A recent intermezzo at the Ribosome Club

CHAPTER4 Translation

Introduction to the Ribosome Overview of protein synthesis on the ribosome Prof. Anders Liljas

RIBOSOME: THE ENGINE OF THE LIVING VON NEUMANN S CONSTRUCTOR

Determinants of the Rate of mrna Translocation in Bacterial Protein Synthesis

Streptomycin interferes with conformational coupling between codon recognition and GTPase activation on the ribosome

Protein synthesis II Biochemistry 302. Bob Kelm February 25, 2004

FUNCTIONAL ROLE OF THE CONSERVED AMINO ACIDS CYSTEINE 81, ARGININE 279, GLYCINE 280 AND ARGININE 283 IN ELONGATION FACTOR TU FROM ESCHERICHIA COLI

Genetic code redundancy and its influence on the encoded polypeptides

Hyperaccurate and Error-Prone Ribosomes Exploit Distinct Mechanisms during trna Selection

Gene Expression: Translation. transmission of information from mrna to proteins Chapter 5 slide 1

Biochemistry Prokaryotic translation

BCMB Chapters 39 & 40 Translation (protein synthesis)

BCMB Chapters 39 & 40 Translation (protein synthesis)

NO!!!!! BCMB Chapters 39 & 40 Translation (protein synthesis) BCMB Chapters 39 & 40 Translation (protein synthesis)

Chapter

Joachim Frank Wadsworth Center Empire State Plaza P.O. Box 509 Albany, New York Tel: (518)

A Microfluidic Approach for Investigating the Temperature Dependence of Biomolecular Activity with Single-Molecule Resolution

The Ribosome as an Optimal Decoder: A Lesson in Molecular Recognition

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1

Lecture 25: Protein Synthesis Key learning goals: Be able to explain the main stuctural features of ribosomes, and know (roughly) how many DNA and

Information Content in Genetics:

Molecular Biology (9)

Insights to the Early Evolution of Earth Life From Studies of the Ribosome. Seven Pines XV-Origins of Life May 20, 2011

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1. Experimental approach for enhancement of unbiased Fo Fc maps.

GENETICS - CLUTCH CH.11 TRANSLATION.

Supplementary Materials for

L I F E S C I E N C E S

Section 7. Junaid Malek, M.D.

Structure of EF-G ribosome complex in a pre-translocation state

Advanced Topics in RNA and DNA. DNA Microarrays Aptamers

TRANSLATION: How to make proteins?

9 The Process of Translation

Quantitative Connection Between Ensemble. Thermodynamics and Single-Molecule Kinetics: A Case Study Using Cryogenic Electron

Multiperspective smfret reveals rate-determining late intermediates of ribosomal translocation

Supporting Information

BIOMOLECULAR SIMULATIONS, FROM RNA TO PROTEIN: THERMODYNAMIC AND DYNAMIC ASPECTS

Effekt des Antibiotikums Kirromycin auf den Elongations Faktor Tu untersucht mit Molekulardynamik-Simulationen

Supplemental Information

Application examples of single particle 3D reconstruction. Ning Gao Tsinghua University

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

RNA & PROTEIN SYNTHESIS. Making Proteins Using Directions From DNA

Molecular Genetics Principles of Gene Expression: Translation

Supporting Information

protein synthesis and the ribosome

Ribosome readthrough

From Gene to Protein

Conformational Variability Experience with Ribosomes

Z. TRANSLATION AND THE RIBOSOME

Intermolecular interactions that lead to the activation and inhibition of ribosome-dependent GTPases

Protein Synthesis. Unit 6 Goal: Students will be able to describe the processes of transcription and translation.

Special Issue: Biman Bagchi Festschrift Received: December 25, 2014 Revised: March 15, 2015 Published: March 18, 2015

Lesson Overview. Ribosomes and Protein Synthesis 13.2

Laith AL-Mustafa. Protein synthesis. Nabil Bashir 10\28\ First

Supplementary Figure 1. Voltage clamp speed. Capacity membrane current in response to a 4- mv voltage step (black). Solid red line corresponds to a

Lecture 13: PROTEIN SYNTHESIS II- TRANSLATION

Ribosomal Elongation Cycle: Energetic, Kinetic and Stereochemical Aspects

P i Release from eif2, Not GTP Hydrolysis, Is the Step Controlled by Start-Site Selection during Eukaryotic Translation Initiation

Molecular Biology of the Cell

The ribosome promotes protein elongation by transfer of the

Chapter 12. Genes: Expression and Regulation

The ternary complex of bacterial elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu),

Ribosome dynamics during decoding

Chapter 19 Overview. Protein Synthesis. for amino acid. n Protein Synthesis genetic info encoded in nucleic acids translated into standard amino acids

Newly made RNA is called primary transcript and is modified in three ways before leaving the nucleus:

UNIT 5. Protein Synthesis 11/22/16

Part IV => DNA and RNA. 4.6 RNA Translation 4.6a Genetic Code 4.6b Translational Machinery

The pathway to GTPase activation of elongation factor SelB on the ribosome

In Genomes, Two Types of Genes

TRANSLATION: How to make proteins?

Organic Chemistry Option II: Chemical Biology

Multiple Choice Review- Eukaryotic Gene Expression

Classification in Real Life (Precise Title to be Announced)

Videos. Bozeman, transcription and translation: Crashcourse: Transcription and Translation -

A rule of seven in Watson-Crick base-pairing of mismatched sequences

From DNA to proteins via the ribosome: Structural insights into the workings of the translation machinery

the noisy gene Biology of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Jan 2008 Juan F. Poyatos Spanish National Biotechnology Centre (CNB)

A GTPase Reaction Accompanying the Rejection of Leu-tRNA, by UUU-programmed Ribosomes

Supporting Information

Genetics 304 Lecture 6

ومن أحياها Translation 1. Translation 1. DONE BY :Maen Faoury

-14. -Abdulrahman Al-Hanbali. -Shahd Alqudah. -Dr Ma mon Ahram. 1 P a g e

Transcription:

Supplementary Figure 1 Comparing rotated- and nonrotated-state lifetimes among mrna m 6 A modifications in different codon contexts. a. mrna sequences used for each experiments, as same as shown in Figure 2a. b. The rotated state and non-rotated state lifetime measurements for all codons in the mrnas used. First row shows the non-rotated state lifetimes for each codons within the mrnas, and second row shows the rotated state lifetimes for each codons within the mrnas. Last row shows the number of ribosomes observed to reach particular codon during translation prior to photobleaching of reporter fluorescence dye.

Supplementary Figure 2 Geometry of the m 6 A-uridine Watson-Crick base-pair interactions. The final A -weighted m2f o -df c electron density map contoured at 1 level shows that a. m6a 1 U36, b. m6a U35 and c. m6a mcm5s2 U34 base pairs are in the Watson-Crick geometry. ASL carbons are colored wheat and mrna carbons are gray. d. The overlay of all structures reveals a nearly identical orientation of the codon:anticodon interaction). The ASL Lys3 UUU AAA complex (colored in gray), the ASL Lys3 UUU (m6a)aa (colored in light pink), ASL Lys3 UUU A(m6A)A (colored in cyan) and ASL Lys3 UUU AA(m6A) (colored in green) are superposed and aligned with respect to the 16S rrna.

Supplementary Figure 3 Proofreading of trna Lys ternary complexes reading (m 6 A)AA. Dipeptide formation was measured at 1µM ribosomes and 0.5 µm ternary complexes. Experiments were done in parallel using the very same ternary complexes reacting with initiation complexes displaying AAA or (m6a)aa codon in the A site. The lower plateau of dipeptide fmet-lys formation for (m6a)aa indicates the rejection of trna Lys after GTP hydrolysis. a. Experiments were done in low Mg 2+ buffer (see Methods). Proofreading factor, f = 1.5, was calculated as the ratio between the plateaus of dipeptide formation for AAA and (m6a)aa. b. Same experiment was performed in high Mg 2+ buffer (see Methods), where proofreading factor was measured to be f = 1.3.

Supplementary Figure 4 Reducing decoding accuracy reduces the effect of m 6 A on translational dynamics in high-mg 2+ conditions. (a) Kinetics of GTP hydrolysis after binding of Lys-tRNA Lys ternary complexes (0.2 µm) to 70S initiation complexes (0.7µM) programmed with AAA or (m6a)aa in the A site. (b) Estimates of k cat /K M -values for GTP hydrolysis. (c) and (d) Kinetics of GTP hydrolysis and dipeptide fmet-lys formation measured simultaneously in the very same experiment. The grey areas represent the total time for all subsequent steps after GTP hydrolysis up to and including peptidyl transfer. (e) Estimates of the compounded rate constant, k pep, for the steps after GTP hydrolysis on EF-Tu up to and including peptidyl transfer, from experiments shown in c and d. See Supplementary Data Table 1 for data in b and e. Kinetic data in a, c, and d are representative of three independent experiments. Error bars in b and e represent SD (n = 3, technical replicates) as calculated from the fitting procedure (Johansson, M. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 79 84 (2011)).

Supplementary Figure 5 m 6 A shifts FRET value between P-site trna and A-site trna in the GTPase-activated state. FRET histogram of the GDPNP-induced prolonged GTPase-activated state and codon-recognition states for unmodified (left) and firstbase m6a modified (right) cases at 15mM magnesium concentration. Values inserted indicate fitted center of Gaussian distribution to histogram, and values in parenthesis indicate 95% confidence interval of fitting. While peaks near 0 FRET efficiency indicates no FRET state, peaks near 0.6 FRET efficiency corresponds to GTPase-activated state. FRET efficiency decreases slightly from 0.643 to 0.585 when cognate AAA codon is modified to (m6a)aa codon, mirroring previous comparison between cognate and near-cognate pairing on Phe (Lee, T., Blanchard, S. C., Kim, H. D., Puglisi, J. D. & Chu, S. The role of fluctuations in trna selection by the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 13661 13665 (2007)).

Supplementary Figure 6 trna-trna FRET lifetime decreases severely with m 6 A at low magnesium. Comparing representative synchronized FRET time evolution between different conditions. Low magnesium condition aggravates the effect of m6a in trna recognition by increasing accuracy of trna selection of ribosome (top left, top middle panel), which inverts ratio between successful accommodation event and transient sampling event compared to high magnesium condition. When decoding is further hindered by GDPNP at low magnesium condition, FRET lifetime at GTPase-activated state decreases and the effect of m6a cannot be detected accurate in our current time resolution of 100 millisecond; decreased FRET event lifetime due to m6a might be less than 100 millisecond, which our measurement would only sample long-lived FRET events rather than giving a correct lifetime. We also performed trna FRET between P site fmet-(cy3)trna fmet and A site Phe-(Cy5)tRNA Phe binding to UUC codon at A site, similar to previously published result for comparison (rightmost two panels). Number of FRET events post-synchronized for each experiment is 316, 213, 497, 577, 221, and 781 for GTP-AAA, GTP-(m6A)AA, GDPNP-AAA, GDPNP-(m6A)AA, GTP-UUC and GDPNP-UUC, respectively.

Supplementary Table 12. Kinetic parameters for trna Lys ternary complex reading codon AAA and (m6a)aa. Buffer 1 Lys codon (k cat /K M ) GTP (µm -1 s -1 ) 2 Proofreading factor (f) 3 k pep (s -1 ) 4 2+ AAA 14.6 ± 0.8 1.0 12.2 ± 0.7 (m6a)aa 1.25 ± 0.07 1.5 7.2 ± 1.4 2+ AAA 31 ± 4 1.0 8.9 ± 0.8 (m6a)aa 6.9 ± 0.4 1.3 4.0 ± 0.6 1 Low Mg 2+ buffer contained 1.3 mm free Mg 2+ ; high Mg 2+ buffer contained 7.5 mm free Mg 2+. See Methods. 2 k cat /K M values for GTP hydrolysis. Related to Figure 3c for low Mg 2+ buffer and Supplementary Figure 4b for high Mg 2+ buffer. 3 Related to Supplementary Figure 3. 4 Compounded rate constant for the steps after GTP hydrolysis on EF-Tu up to and including peptidyl transfer. Related to Figure 3f for low Mg 2+ buffer and Supplementary Figure 4e for high Mg 2+ buffer.