Magnetic Neutron Reflectometry. Moses Marsh Shpyrko Group 9/14/11

Similar documents
Neutron Reflectometry

Surface Sensitive X-ray Scattering

X-Ray Scattering Studies of Thin Polymer Films

Small Angle Neutron Scattering in Different Fields of Research. Henrich Frielinghaus

Studying Nuclear Structure

MIDTERM 3 REVIEW SESSION. Dr. Flera Rizatdinova

Main Notation Used in This Book

Neutrons as probe particles V pseudo Fermi

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

Introduction to Reflectometry and Small Angle Scattering under Grazing Incidence

Neutron facilities and generation. Rob McQueeney, Ames Laboratory and Iowa State University

22.54 Neutron Interactions and Applications (Spring 2004) Chapter 1 (2/3/04) Overview -- Interactions, Distributions, Cross Sections, Applications

Neutron Instruments I & II. Ken Andersen ESS Instruments Division

Brewster Angle and Total Internal Reflection

Typical anisotropies introduced by geometry (not everything is spherically symmetric) temperature gradients magnetic fields electrical fields

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

Physics of Finite and Infinite Nuclear Systems Phys. 477 (542)

Interaction X-rays - Matter

(10%) (c) What other peaks can appear in the pulse-height spectrum if the detector were not small? Give a sketch and explain briefly.

Brewster Angle and Total Internal Reflection

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

Liquid Scattering X-ray School November University of California San Diego

AMOR the time-of-flight neutron reflectometer at SINQ/PSI

An Introduc+on to X-ray Reflec+vity

1. Nuclear Size. A typical atom radius is a few!10 "10 m (Angstroms). The nuclear radius is a few!10 "15 m (Fermi).

Lecture 5: Polarization. Polarized Light in the Universe. Descriptions of Polarized Light. Polarizers. Retarders. Outline

Structural characterization. Part 1

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 4 Nature of the nuclear force. Reminder: Investigate

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics. Quantum Mechanics Qualifying Examination. January 7, 2013 (Tuesday) 9:00 am - 12:00 noon

Neutron and x-ray spectroscopy

1. Electricity and Magnetism (Fall 1995, Part 1) A metal sphere has a radius R and a charge Q.

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

PARTICLES AND WAVES CHAPTER 29 CONCEPTUAL QUESTIONS

Lecture 2: Thin Films. Thin Films. Calculating Thin Film Stack Properties. Jones Matrices for Thin Film Stacks. Mueller Matrices for Thin Film Stacks

Ferromagnetic Domain Distribution in Thin Films During Magnetization Reversal. and E. D. Dahlberg 3. Abstract

X-ray Surface Diffraction & Reflectivity

Doppler echocardiography & Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Doppler echocardiography. History: - Langevin developed sonar.

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2008 Assignment 10

221B Lecture Notes Scattering Theory II

Chapter NEUTRON REFLECTION: PRINCIPLES AND EXAMPLES OF APPLICATIONS

DIFFRACTION PHYSICS THIRD REVISED EDITION JOHN M. COWLEY. Regents' Professor enzeritus Arizona State University

Let b be the distance of closest approach between the trajectory of the center of the moving ball and the center of the stationary one.

Lecture notes 5: Diffraction

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 6

Quantum Mechanics II

Neutron Reflectometry of Ferromagnetic Arrays

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 3 Homework 1 Nuclear Phenomenology

Scattering is perhaps the most important experimental technique for exploring the structure of matter.

Lecture 5 Scattering theory, Born Approximation. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Lecture 06. Fundamentals of Lidar Remote Sensing (4) Physical Processes in Lidar

Solid State Physics Lecture 3 Diffraction and the Reciprocal Lattice (Kittel Ch. 2)

Wave Propagation in Uniaxial Media. Reflection and Transmission at Interfaces

Part I. Basics of neutron scattering

Electromagnetic Waves Across Interfaces

Spins and spin-orbit coupling in semiconductors, metals, and nanostructures

Self-Assembled Iron Oxide Thin Films at the Liquid-Air Interface

Making the Invisible Visible: Probing Antiferromagnetic Order in Novel Materials

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics 8.03 Practice Final Exam 3

Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 19 (11/22/06) Gamma Interactions: Compton Scattering

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Interaction of Radiation with Matter. Particles: probes. Two process of interaction. Absorption and scattering. k d 2q. I k i

Methoden moderner Röntgenphysik II: Streuung und Abbildung

1.2 Spin Dependent Scattering - II

Physics 6C. Final Practice Solutions. Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2005 Assignment 9

Neutron Diffraction: a general overview

2. Determine the excess charge on the outer surface of the outer sphere (a distance c from the center of the system).

Lecture3 (and part of lecture 4).

A NEW SMALL ANGLE X-RAY SCATTERING TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING NANO-SCALE PORE/PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS IN THIN FILM

Direct method for imaging elemental distribution profiles with long-period x-ray standing waves

(Total 1 mark) IB Questionbank Physics 1

Introduction to Neutron Scattering

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 13 Spins in Magnetic Fields

Resonances and off-specular scattering in neutron waveguides

School on Pulsed Neutrons: Characterization of Materials October Neurton Sources & Scattering Techniques (1-2)

Characterization of semiconductor hetero- and nanostructures scattering

Experimental Determination of Crystal Structure

from which follow by application of chain rule relations y = y (4) ˆL z = i h by constructing θ , find also ˆL x ˆL y and

Common Exam Department of Physics University of Utah August 24, 2002

Electron-positron production in kinematic conditions of PrimEx

The Configuration of the Atom: Rutherford s Model

NEUTRON REFLECTOMETRY STUDIES OF THIN FILMS AND MULTILAYERED MATERIALS

Ambiguity of optical coherence tomography measurements due to rough surface scattering

University of Oslo. Department of Physics. Interaction Between Ionizing Radiation And Matter, Part 2 Charged-Particles.

Polarimetry in the E-ELT era. Polarized Light in the Universe. Descriptions of Polarized Light. Polarizers. Retarders. Fundamentals of Polarized Light

Quantum Condensed Matter Physics Lecture 5

Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry

and S is in the state ( )

Scattering. 1 Classical scattering of a charged particle (Rutherford Scattering)

Non-relativistic scattering

Quasi-specular albedo of cold neutrons from powder of nanoparticles

Electronic Structure of Atoms. Chapter 6

A neutron polariser based on magnetically remanent Fe/Si supermirrors

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

Some properties of waves: Huygens principle Superposition Coherence Interference Young s double-slit experiment Thin-film interference

Chapter 10. Interference of Light

The wavefunction ψ for an electron confined to move within a box of linear size L = m, is a standing wave as shown.

Solutions: Homework 7

Calculating Thin Film Stack Properties. Polarization Properties of Thin Films

Transcription:

Magnetic Neutron Reflectometry Moses Marsh Shpyrko Group 9/14/11

Outline Scattering processes Reflectivity of a slab of material Magnetic scattering Off-specular scattering Source parameters Comparison with x-rays

Neutrons are waves de Broglie wavelength: λ = h p = h mv Example: λ = 2A, v = 1978 m s, E = mv2 2 = 20.5 mev Plane wave: ψ~e ik r, k = 2π λ

Scattering from a single fixed nucleus k Incident plane wave: ψ~e ikx Potential from nucleus: V r = 2πħ2 m Outgoing spherical wave ψ~ b r eikr b δ(r) Differential cross section: dσ dω = b2, b = scattering length

Source: Sinha lecture

Reflectometry: Neutrons in media Neutrons incident on a slab of material at grazing angle Average scattering length density: ρ = i N i b i Neutrons sample average in-plane density ρ z = ρ(x, y, z) xy Elastic scattering Energy in vacuum: E = ħ2 k 2 0 2m Energy in medium: E = ħ2 k 2 Index of refraction: n = k k 0 = 1 4π 2m 2 ρ = 1 λ 0 k 0 ρ is typically on the order of 10 6 A 2 ħ2 + V = 2m (k2 4πρ) 2 2π ρ

Fresnel Reflectivity k i n 1 Q k r Specular reflection: α r = α i Q = 2k iz z = 4π λ sin (α i)z Reflection coefficient: ratio of reflected amplitude to incident amplitude α i α r α t n 2 k t Reflectivity: r = k iz k tz k iz +k tz = 1 R = r 2 Q c2 = 16πρ Q c 2Q 1 Q c Q 1+ 1 Q c Q 2 2 4 for Q Qc

Fresnel Reflectivity R(Q) ~Q 4

Thin film on a substrate: Kiessig fringes d ρ 1 ρ 1 > ρ 2 ρ 2 2π/d ρ 1 < ρ 2

Multilayer: Parratt formula ρ 1 ρ 2 ρ 3 ρ j ρ j+1 Net reflectivity at the surface can be calculated exactly by enforcing continuity at each interface Dynamical: accounts for transmission and reflection at each interface ρ N 1 ρ N

Reflectivity from an arbitrary ρ(z) Divide up ρ(z) into slices of constant ρ and apply Parratt formula e.g. ρ Or: apply Born approx. (kinematical treatment) r(q) 4π ρ(z)e iqz dz iq Assumes scattering is weak. Fails near Q c where reflectivity approaches unity (strong scattering) z

Inverting Reflectivity Data How do you get ρ(z) from R(Q)? Start with a good model and refine parameters Inverse Fourier transform: phase can be recovered by adding reference layers of known density to the front & back of the film (Majkrzak 1995)

Magnetic reflectometry A magnetic field adds a spin-dependent potential to the Schrödinger equation V m = μ B = μσ B μ is the neutron magnetic moment σ has the Pauli spin matrices as components We now have to treat the incoming plane wave as a spinor: ψ = ψ + ψ Polarizers and analyzers allow control of which spin hits the sample as well as which spin is detected

SNS BL4a Schematic

Magnetic reflectometry Let z be the spin quantization axis, and let x lie along Q Only the components of B perpendicular to Q contribute to scattering This gives rise to a set of coupled Schrödinger equations for ψ + and ψ 2 x + k 0x2 4πρ ++ ψ + 4πρ + ψ = 0 2 x + k 0x2 4πρ ψ 4πρ + ψ + = 0 ρ ±± = ρ n ± m μb 2πħ 2 z ; ρ ± = m μ(b 2πħ 2 x ib y ) z x y θ B

Magnetic reflectometry ρ + and ρ + cause spin flips during scattering If B is parallel to z, then the equations decouple and there is no spin flipping. Then we can treat each polarization separately. For arbitrary B(z) we can solve for the reflectivity numerically using an approach similar to the Parratt formalism (Felcher 1987) Corrections must be applied for incomplete beam polarization

Magnetic reflectometry Simulations: alternating Fe/Cr layers, each 4nm thick. 20 layers total. Magnetism only in Fe layers Zabel 1994

Non-specular reflection Diffuse scattering from interfacial roughness (Sinha 1988) Off specular peaks from in-plane order Also Yoneda peaks near the critical angle, where the transmission coefficient is maximized Sensitive to components of B normal to plane Zabel 1994

What about x-rays? Brighter, more coherent sources Element specificity Unaffected by external magnetic fields Lower penetration depth Insensitive to light elements Magnetic scattering much weaker than charge scattering

Spallation Neutron Source (ORNL) Proton accelerated into mercury target, neutrons knocked loose Neutrons come out in pulses (60 Hz) Moderator gives them a thermal distribution of velocities Detector uses time of flight methods to determine Q

SNS BL4a Fact Sheet Wavelength range: 1.8A < λ < 14.0A Q range: 0 < Q < 0.4A 1 Minimum reflectivity: 10 8 Magnetic field max 1.2 T with a gap of 50 mm 3 T with a gap of 10 mm Temperature range: 5 750 K

References H. Zabel, X-ray and neutron reflectivity analysis of thin films and superlattices, Applied Physics A Solids and Surfaces, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 159-168, Mar. 1994. C. F. Majkrzak and N. F. Berk, Exact determination of the phase in neutron reflectometry, Physical Review B, vol. 52, no. 15, p. 10827, Oct. 1995. S. K. Sinha, E. B. Sirota, S. Garoff, and H. B. Stanley, X-ray and neutron scattering from rough surfaces, Physical Review B, vol. 38, no. 4, p. 2297, 1988. G. P. Felcher, R. O. Hilleke, R. K. Crawford, J. Haumann, R. Kleb, and G. Ostrowski, Polarized neutron reflectometer: A new instrument to measure magnetic depth profiles, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 58, no. 4, p. 609, 1987. Lectures by Majkrzak, Sinha, Pynn

Scattering from many nuclei k k q = k k dσ = b dω i b j e ιq (r r ) i j ij Ensemble average: dσ = b 2 S(q) dω S q = e ιq (r r ) i j ij = ρ n q ρ n (q) ρ n q is the Fourier transform of nuclear density