Fog detection product

Similar documents
Day Microphysics RGB Nephanalysis in daytime. Meteorological Satellite Center, JMA

Day Snow-Fog RGB Detection of low-level clouds and snow/ice covered area

How to display RGB imagery by SATAID

Global and Regional OSEs at JMA

Inter-comparison MTSAT-2 & Himawari-8

Ash RGB Detection of Volcanic Ash

Himawari-8 True Color RGB

JMA s atmospheric motion vectors

Rapidly Developing Cumulus Area RDCA detection using Himawari-8 data

CURRENT STATUS OF OPERATIONAL WIND PRODUCT IN JMA/MSC

The MODIS Cloud Data Record

NOWCASTING PRODUCTS BASED ON MTSAT-1R RAPID SCAN OBSERVATION. In response to CGMS Action 38.33

RGB in Broadcast Meteorology

The Impact of Observational data on Numerical Weather Prediction. Hirokatsu Onoda Numerical Prediction Division, JMA

Introduction of JMA VLab Support Site on RGB Composite Imagery and tentative RGBs

Assimilation of Himawari-8 Atmospheric Motion Vectors into the Numerical Weather Prediction Systems of Japan Meteorological Agency

SAFNWC/MSG SEVIRI CLOUD PRODUCTS

Himawari 8/9 data distribution/dissemination plan

TWO APPLICATIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR AMVS OF NSMC/CMA

AN OBSERVING SYSTEM EXPERIMENT OF MTSAT RAPID SCAN AMV USING JMA MESO-SCALE OPERATIONAL NWP SYSTEM

RGB Experts and Developers Workshop - Introduction Tokyo, Japan 7-9 Nov 2017

Observing system experiments of MTSAT-2 Rapid Scan Atmospheric Motion Vector for T-PARC 2008 using the JMA operational NWP system

Towards the assimilation of all-sky infrared radiances of Himawari-8. Kozo Okamoto 1,2

Monitoring Sand and Dust Storms from Space

JMA s ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTORS In response to Action 40.22

Preparation for Himawari 8

The Improvement of JMA Operational Wave Models

Current Status of COMS AMV in NMSC/KMA

Impact of GPS and TMI Precipitable Water Data on Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model Forecasts

" The usefulness of RGB products: the perspective of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology "

Evaluation and assimilation of all-sky infrared radiances of Himawari-8

WIND PROFILER NETWORK OF JAPAN METEOROLOGICAL AGENCY

IMPACT STUDIES OF AMVS AND SCATTEROMETER WINDS IN JMA GLOBAL OPERATIONAL NWP SYSTEM

Status and Plans of using the scatterometer winds in JMA's Data Assimilation and Forecast System

Ice fog: T~<-10C RHi>100%

4.1 New Generation Satellite Data and Nowcasting Products: Himawari

Operational Use of Scatterometer Winds at JMA

Current status and plans of JMA operational wind product

JMA s Ensemble Prediction System for One-month and Seasonal Predictions

Satellites, Weather and Climate Module 1: Introduction to the Electromagnetic Spectrum

Applications of the SEVIRI window channels in the infrared.

RGB Experts and Developers Workshop 2017 Tokyo, Japan

RECENT UPGRADES OF AND ACTIVITIES FOR ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTORS AT JMA/MSC

FUTURE PLAN AND RECENT ACTIVITIES FOR THE JAPANESE FOLLOW-ON GEOSTATIONARY METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE HIMAWARI-8/9

NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS USING CLOUD MOTION WINDS AT ECMWF GRAEME KELLY. ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading ABSTRACT

Changes in Cloud Cover and Cloud Types Over the Ocean from Surface Observations, Ryan Eastman Stephen G. Warren Carole J.

Cloud Analysis Image: Product Guide

Assimilation of Himawari-8 data into JMA s NWP systems

Meteorological Satellite Image Interpretations, Part III. Acknowledgement: Dr. S. Kidder at Colorado State Univ.

Developments at DWD: Integrated water vapour (IWV) from ground-based GPS

Atmospheric Boundary Layer over Land, Ocean, and Ice. Xubin Zeng, Michael Brunke, Josh Welty, Patrick Broxton University of Arizona

ESCI 344 Tropical Meteorology Lesson 7 Temperature, Clouds, and Rain

P3.24 EVALUATION OF MODERATE-RESOLUTION IMAGING SPECTRORADIOMETER (MODIS) SHORTWAVE INFRARED BANDS FOR OPTIMUM NIGHTTIME FOG DETECTION

ECNU WORKSHOP LAB ONE 2011/05/25)

Masahiro Kazumori, Takashi Kadowaki Numerical Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency

Comparison of NASA AIRS and MODIS Land Surface Temperature and Infrared Emissivity Measurements from the EOS AQUA platform

Arctic Weather Every 10 Minutes: Design & Operation of ABI for PCW

Short-Term Forecasting of Surface Solar Irradiance Based on Meteosat-SEVIRI Data Using a Nighttime Cloud lndex

Introducing Atmospheric Motion Vectors Derived from the GOES-16 Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI)

Tonga Country Report

VALIDATION RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL LSA-SAF SNOW COVER MAPPING

How Tokyo VAAC s forecasters uses RGB products

A Time Lag Model to Estimate Rainfall Rate Based on GOES Data

Assimilation of GNSS Radio Occultation Data at JMA. Hiromi Owada, Yoichi Hirahara and Masami Moriya Japan Meteorological Agency

TWO APPLICATIONS OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR AMVS OF NSMC/CMA. Zhang Xiaohu, Xu Jianmin National Satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing , CHINA

Fog Detection(FOG) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document

STATUS OF JAPANESE METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITES AND RECENT ACTIVITIES OF MSC

Satellite observation of atmospheric dust

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTING CLOUD MOTION AND WATER VAPOR MOTION WINDS FROM GMS-5 IMAGE DATA ABSTRACT

Applications of multi-spectral satellite data

Steve Ackerman, R. Holz, R Frey, S. Platnick, A. Heidinger, and a bunch of others.

Development of JMA storm surge model

Recent Improvement of Integrated Observation Systems in JMA

Condensation Nuclei. Condensation Nuclei 2/10/11. Hydrophobic Water-repelling Oils, gasoline, paraffin Resist condensation, even above 100% RH

Appendix B. A proposition for updating the environmental standards using real Earth Albedo and Earth IR Flux for Spacecraft Thermal Analysis

Condensation: Dew, Fog, & Clouds. Chapter 5

CLOUD MOTION WINDS FROM FY-2 AND GMS-5 METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITES. Xu Jianmin, Zhang Qisong, Fang Xiang, Liu Jian

Recent Developments of JMA Operational NWP Systems and WGNE Intercomparison of Tropical Cyclone Track Forecast

11 days (00, 12 UTC) 132 hours (06, 18 UTC) One unperturbed control forecast and 26 perturbed ensemble members. --

Climate & Earth System Science. Introduction to Meteorology & Climate. Chapter 05 SOME OBSERVING INSTRUMENTS. Instrument Enclosure.

Status and Plans of Next Generation Japanese Geostationary Meteorological Satellites Himawari 8/9

Using the CRTM and GOES Observations to Improve Model Microphysics

RECENT ADVANCES TO EXPERIMENTAL GMS ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTOR PROCESSING SYSTEM AT MSC/JMA

Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp , Day-to-Night Cloudiness Change of Cloud Types Inferred from

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Remote Ground based observations Merging Method For Visibility and Cloud Ceiling Assessment During the Night Using Data Mining Algorithms

TOWARDS IMPROVED HEIGHT ASSIGNMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL OF AMVS IN MET OFFICE NWP

Recent Developments of JMA Operational NWP Systems and WGNE Intercomparison of Tropical Cyclone Track Forecast

Developments in CALIOP Aerosol Products. Dave Winker

VERIFICATION OF MERIS LEVEL 2 PRODUCTS: CLOUD TOP PRESSURE AND CLOUD OPTICAL THICKNESS

Development of Innovative Technology to Provide Low-Cost Surface Atmospheric Observations in Data-sparse Regions

Evaluation and Assimilation of Remotely- Sensed Lake Surface Temperature in the HIRLAM Weather Forecasting System

The next-generation supercomputer and NWP system of the JMA

Country scale solar irradiance forecasting for PV power trading

Project Moon Watch. What You Need. Find Out Do this activity to see how the moon s appearance changes during a 30-day period.

AVIATION APPLICATIONS OF A NEW GENERATION OF MESOSCALE NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION SYSTEM OF THE HONG KONG OBSERVATORY

WG1 Overview. PP KENDA for km-scale EPS: LETKF. current DA method: nudging. radar reflectivity (precip): latent heat nudging 1DVar (comparison)

Feature-tracked 3D Winds from Satellite Sounders: Derivation and Impact in Global Models

RGB Products: an easy and practical way to display multispectral satellite data (in combination with derived products)

Satellite Soil Moisture Content Data Assimilation in Operational Local NWP System at JMA

Transcription:

Fog detection product derived from RGB recipes Takumi Maruyama, Haruma Ishida and Koetsu Chubachi Meteorological Satellite Center / Japan Meteorological Agency Meteorological Research Institute / Japan Meteorological Agency HAREX CORPORATION RGB Experts and Developers Workshop 2017 JMA Headquarters, Tokyo, Japan, 7-9 Nov 2017 2014 HIMAWARI-8 2016 HIMAWARI-9

Introduction Seasonal variability of Night microphysics RGB Night microphysics RGB is useful for monitoring low cloud (fog) in nighttime. However, the colors are changed by depending on seasonal variations and climate characteristics (regional dependence). Fog/St Fog/St Summer Jun, 5, 2017 18UTC Winter Jan, 3, 2016 18UTC The variability of the colors brings forecasters some difficulties to understand the meaning of the colors. 2

Outline of Fog Detection Satellite based threshold Nighttime NWP(T, RH) based threshold Radiosonde (Kushiro) Night microphysics RGB Daytime black : T ( ) blue : Td ( ) Night microphysics RGB hutched area : NWP_RH(Surf) > 90% Natural color RGB General features of (radiation) Fog Relative humidity is high (almost 100%) at surface. Cloud top height is low and the cloud top temperature is similar to the ground surface temperature. Capped inversion layer is formed at cloud top and relative humidity is low above the cloud top. 3

Example : RGB imagery with Fog detection product (Near Japan) Night Microphysics RGB Day/Night Fog Detection Product Fog/St Natural color RGB Fog/St Yellow:Nighttime Red:Daytime Meso-Scale Model (MSM) is used for NWP. Spatial resolution : 0.02 Time resolution : 10 minutes Jun, 05, 2017 1600UTC Jun, 05, 2017 2350UTC 4

Threshold in nighttime (Satellite) Fog Low cloud Clear sky horizontal axis : BT(B07, 3.9μm) BT(B13, 10.4μm) vertical axis : BT(B13, 10.4μm) ( ) color : BT(B13, 10.4μm) BT(B15, 12.4μm) BT(B07) BT(B13) value is lower than -1.5 in many fog cases. BT(B13) value is higher than -10 in many fog cases. It may suggest that ice fog cases are very few. BT : Brightness Temperature SYNOP (Jul, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016) 5

Threshold in nighttime (NWP) Fog Low cloud Clear sky horizontal axis : NWP_RH(Surf) (%) vertical axis : NWP_T(Surf) BT(B13, 10.4μm) color(red) : NWP_RH(Surf) > NWP_RH(700hPa, 850hPa, 925hPa) color(blue) : NWP_RH(Surf) =< NWP_RH(700hPa, 850hPa, 925hPa) BT : Brightness Temperature NWP_T : NWP Temperature NWP_RH : NWP Relative Humidity NWP_T(Surf) BT(B13) value is lower than 10 in many fog cases. NWP_RH(Surf) value is higher than 85% in many fog cases. NWP_RH(Surf) value is highest under 700hPa in many fog cases. SYNOP (Jul, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016) 6

Process flow in nighttime Start BT(B13) > NWP_T(700hPa) and NWP_RH(700hPa) < 90% high/middle cloud elimination No Yes BT(B07) BT(B13) < -1.5 low cloud extraction No No Yes BT : Brightness Temperature REF : Reflectance NWP_T : NWP Temperature NWP_RH : NWP Relative Humidity fog extraction1 NWP_T(Surf) BT(B13) < 10 and BT(B13) > 10 Yes NWP_RH(Surf)>=85% and NWP_RH(Surf) > NWP_RH (700hPa, 850hPa, 925hPa) Result=Not fog No fog extraction2 Yes Result=Fog B07 : 3.9μm B13 : 10.4μm End 7

Threshold in daytime (Satellite) Fog Low cloud Clear sky horizontal axis : REF(B03, 0.64μm) vertical axis : REF(B05, 1.6μm) / REF(B04, 0.86μm) color : BT(B13, 10.4μm) ( ) BT : Brightness Temperature REF : Reflectance When REF(B03) value is high but REF(B05) / REF(B04) value is low, land surface may be covered with snow/ice. REF(B03) value is lower than 0.3 in many clear sky (land surface) cases. SYNOP (Jul, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016) 8

Threshold in daytime (NWP) Fog Low cloud Clear sky horizontal axis : NWP_RH(Surf) (%) vertical axis : NWP_T(Surf) BT(B13, 10.4μm) color(red) : NWP_RH(Surf) > NWP_RH(700hPa, 850hPa, 925hPa) color(blue) : NWP_RH(Surf) =< NWP_RH(700hPa, 850hPa, 925hPa) BT : Brightness Temperature NWP_T : NWP Temperature NWP_RH : NWP Relative Humidity NWP_T(Surf) BT(B13) value is lower than 10 in many fog cases. NWP_RH(Surf) value is higher than 85% in many fog cases. NWP_RH(Surf) value is highest under 700hPa in many fog cases. SYNOP (Jul, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016) 9

Process flow in daytime Start BT(B13) >T_NWP(700hPa) and RH_NWP(700hPa)<90% high/middle cloud elimination No Yes REF(B03) > 0.3 and REF(B05) / REF(B04) > 0.5 low cloud extraction snow/ice elimination No No Yes BT : Brightness Temperature REF : Reflectance T_NWP : NWP Temperature RH_NWP : NWP Relative Humidity fog extraction1 T_NWP(Surf) BT(B13) < 10 and BT(B13) > 10 Yes RH_NWP(Surf)>=85% and RH_NWP(Surf)>RH_NWP (700hPa, 850hPa, 925hPa) Result=Not fog No fog extraction2 Yes Result=Fog B03 : 0.64μm Snow/ice area is eliminated by B04 : 0.86μm End B05 : 1.6μm visible and near-infrared bands B13 : 10.4μm in daytime. 10

Evaluation by ground observations (SYNOP) Aug, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016 Threat Score= FO/(FO+FX+XO) Bias Score=(FO+FX)/(FO+XO) Hit Ratio = (FO+XX)/N Misdetection Ratio= FX/(FO+FX) Undetected Ratio = XO/M SYNOP total Fog Not Fog Misdetection Fog Fog Hit(FO) FO+FX (FX) Detection Not Undetected Product Hit(XX) XO+XX Fog (XO) total M X N Requirement Clear sky or Low cloud or Fog by SYNOP Sun zenith angle > 93 (nighttime) or < 85 (daytime) BT(B13, 10.4μm) > NWP_T(700hPa) NWP_T(700hPa) < 90% Meso-Scale Model (MSM) is used for NWP. SYNOP Day/Night (24 Hour) Fog Detection Product Daytime Nighttime Number of data 12416 12999 Threat Score 0.329 0.349 Bias Score 1.094 1.295 Hit Ratio 0.917 0.874 Misdetection Ratio 0.526 0.542 Undetected Ratio 0.482 0.407 Nearest grid to SYNOP is evaluated. Accuracy is almost same between day and night. Main reason of misdetection and undetected is failure of distinguishing between fog and low cloud (especially stratus). 11

Pros/Cons of the fog product Pros Can detect fog at day and night boundary. Can detect fog visible through the gap between the high/middle clouds Cons Can t detect fog under the high/middle clouds. Can t detect ice fog for fear of misdetection of clear sky over snow/ice area. Can t detect local fog such as valley fog that is smaller than the product resolution Fog detection area depends on NWP accuracy and characteristics 12

Summary Night microphysics RGB is useful for monitoring low cloud (fog) in nighttime. However, colors of RGB imagery is changed by some features (regional dependence, seasonal dependence). This variability brings forecasters some difficulties to understand the meaning of the colors. We developed Day/Night Fog Detection product. It can display fog area in the same color without regional and seasonal dependence. Main reason of misdetection and undetected is failure of distinguishing between fog and low cloud (especially stratus). Even though we use NWP data, it is difficult to distinguish them. 13

Thank you for your kind attention! 14

Appendix 15

Example : RGB imagery with Fog detection product (Full Disk) Night Microphysics RGB Day/Night Fog Detection Product True Color Reproduction Image (m) Yellow:Nighttime Red:Daytime Global Spectral Model (GSM) is used for NWP. Spatial resolution : 0.02 Time resolution : 10 minutes Oct, 07, 2017 2100UTC SYNOP fog observation point and visibility (color) We also plan to develop full disk fog detection product which uses Global Spectral Model (GSM). 16

What s Night Microphysics RGB? 2015-02-16 10UTC R : B15(I2 12.3)-B13(IR 10.4) Range : -4~2 [K] Gamma : 1.0 G : B13(IR 10.4)-B07(I4 3.9) Range : 0~10 [K] Gamma : 1.0 Thick Upper Cloud How Low the Cloud or Surface B : B13(IR 10.4) (Reverse) Range : 243~293 [K] Gamma : 1.0 Lower Water Cloud 17

Night Microphysics Cold, thick, high level cloud Very cold (< 50 C), thick, high level cloud Thin Cirrus cloud Thick, mid level cloud Thin, mid level cloud Low level cloud (high latitudes) Low level cloud (low latitudes) Ocean Land Note: Based on SEVIRI/EUMETSAT interpretation 18

19

Misdetection of low cloud Daytime Low cloud Nighttime It is difficult to distinguish between fog and stratus. horizontal axis : NWP_RH(Surf) (%) vertical axis : NWP_T(Surf) BT(B13, 10.4μm) 0(blue):Cumulonimbus 1(green):Cumulus 2(yellow):Cumulus and Stratocumulus 3(orange):Stratocumulus 4(red):Stratus BT : Brightness Temperature NWP_T : NWP Temperature NWP_RH : NWP Relative Humidity SYNOP (Jul, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016) 20

Evaluation by ground observations (SHIP) Aug, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016 Threat Score= FO/(FO+FX+XO) Bias Score=(FO+FX)/(FO+XO) Hit Ratio = (FO+XX)/N Misdetection Ratio= FX/(FO+FX) Undetected Ratio = XO/M SHIP total Fog No Fog Misdetection Fog Fog Hit(FO) FO+FX (FX) Detection Not Undetected Product Hit(XX) XO+XX Fog (XO) total M X N Requirement Clear sky or Low cloud or Fog by SHIP Sun zenith angle > 93 (nighttime) or < 85 (daytime) BT(B13, 10.4μm) > NWP_T(700hPa) NWP_T(700hPa) < 90% SHIP Day/Night (24 Hour) Fog Detection Product Daytime Nighttime Number of data 1368 976 Threat Score 0.314 0.426 Bias Score 1.284 1.122 Hit Ratio 0.923 0.964 Misdetection Ratio 0.575 0.435 Undetected Ratio 0.455 0.366 Nearest grid to SHIP is evaluated. Meso-Scale Model (MSM) is used for NWP. 21

Evaluation by ground observations (SHIP) Aug, 1, 2016 Jul, 31, 2017 Threat Score= FO/(FO+FX+XO) Bias Score=(FO+FX)/(FO+XO) Hit Ratio = (FO+XX)/N Misdetection Ratio= FX/(FO+FX) Undetected Ratio = XO/M SHIP total Fog No Fog Misdetection Fog Fog Hit(FO) FO+FX (FX) Detection Not Undetected Product Hit(XX) XO+XX Fog (XO) total M X N Requirement Clear sky or Low cloud or Fog by SHIP Sun zenith angle > 93 (nighttime) or < 85 (daytime) BT(B13, 10.4μm) > NWP_T(700hPa) NWP_T(700hPa) < 90% SHIP Day/Night (24 Hour) Fog Detection Product Daytime Nighttime Number of data 1120 944 Threat Score 0.237 0.377 Bias Score 1.848 1.086 Hit Ratio 0.948 0.965 Misdetection Ratio 0.705 0.474 Undetected Ratio 0.455 0.429 Nearest grid to SHIP is evaluated. Meso-Scale Model (MSM) is used for NWP. 22

Evaluation by ground observations (SYNOP) Aug, 1, 2016 Jul, 31, 2017 Threat Score= FO/(FO+FX+XO) Bias Score=(FO+FX)/(FO+XO) Hit Ratio = (FO+XX)/N Misdetection Ratio= FX/(FO+FX) Undetected Ratio = XO/M SYNOP total Fog Not Fog Misdetection Fog Fog Hit(FO) FO+FX (FX) Detection Not Undetected Product Hit(XX) XO+XX Fog (XO) total M X N Requirement Clear sky or Low cloud or Fog by SYNOP Sun zenith angle > 93 (nighttime) or < 85 (daytime) BT(B13, 10.4μm) > NWP_T(700hPa) NWP_T(700hPa) < 90% SYNOP Day/Night (24 Hour) Fog Detection Product Daytime Nighttime Number of data 12581 13117 Threat Score 0.334 0.345 Bias Score 1.047 1.377 Hit Ratio 0.908 0.879 Misdetection Ratio 0.510 0.558 Undetected Ratio 0.487 0.391 Nearest grid to SYNOP is evaluated. Meso-Scale Model (MSM) is used for NWP. 23

Evaluation by ground observations (SYNOP) Aug, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016 Threat Score= FO/(FO+FX+XO) Bias Score=(FO+FX)/(FO+XO) Hit Ratio = (FO+XX)/N Misdetection Ratio= FX/(FO+FX) Undetected Ratio = XO/M SYNOP total Fog Not Fog Misdetection Fog Fog Hit(FO) FO+FX (FX) Detection Not Undetected Product Hit(XX) XO+XX Fog (XO) total M X N Requirement Clear sky or Low cloud or Fog by SYNOP Sun zenith angle > 93 (nighttime) or < 85 (daytime) BT(B13, 10.4μm) > NWP_T(700hPa) NWP_T(700hPa) < 90% SYNOP Day/Night (24 Hour) Fog Detection Product Daytime Nighttime Number of data 12894 13313 Threat Score 0.300 0.311 Bias Score 1.480 1.620 Hit Ratio 0.899 0.845 Misdetection Ratio 0.613 0.617 Undetected Ratio 0.427 0.379 Nearest grid to SYNOP is evaluated. Global Spectral Model (GSM) is used for NWP. 24

Evaluation by ground observations (SHIP) Aug, 1, 2015 Jul, 31, 2016 Threat Score= FO/(FO+FX+XO) Bias Score=(FO+FX)/(FO+XO) Hit Ratio = (FO+XX)/N Misdetection Ratio= FX/(FO+FX) Undetected Ratio = XO/M SHIP total Fog No Fog Misdetection Fog Fog Hit(FO) FO+FX (FX) Detection Not Undetected Product Hit(XX) XO+XX Fog (XO) total M X N Requirement Clear sky or Low cloud or Fog by SHIP Sun zenith angle > 93 (nighttime) or < 85 (daytime) BT(B13, 10.4μm) > NWP_T(700hPa) NWP_T(700hPa) < 90% SHIP Day/Night (24 Hour) Fog Detection Product Daytime Nighttime Number of data 1403 1012 Threat Score 0.270 0.390 Bias Score 1.539 1.432 Hit Ratio 0.907 0.954 Misdetection Ratio 0.650 0.524 Undetected Ratio 0.461 0.318 Nearest grid to SHIP is evaluated. Global Spectral Model (GSM) is used for NWP. 25