Determination of the seismicity and peak ground acceleration for Lombok island: an evaluation on tectonic setting

Similar documents
Determination of the seismicity and peak ground acceleration for Lombok Island: An evaluation on tectonic setting

THE EFFECT OF THE LATEST SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE TO MALAYSIAN PENINSULAR

FOCAL MECHANISMS OF SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE JAVA TRENCH: PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR THE PSHA FOR YOGYAKARTA REGION, INDONESIA

Seismic Activity near the Sunda and Andaman Trenches in the Sumatra Subduction Zone

Convergent plate boundaries. Objective to be able to explain the formation and key features of these zones.

Answers: Internal Processes and Structures (Isostasy)

The Subsurface Soil Effects Study Using the Short and Long Predominant Periods From H/V Spectrum In Yogyakarta City

Seismic Characteristics and Energy Release of Aftershock Sequences of Two Giant Sumatran Earthquakes of 2004 and 2005

RECIPE FOR PREDICTING STRONG GROUND MOTIONS FROM FUTURE LARGE INTRASLAB EARTHQUAKES

Chapter 3. Geology & Tectonics

Development of a Predictive Simulation System for Crustal Activities in and around Japan - II

GLY 155 Introduction to Physical Geology, W. Altermann. Press & Siever, compressive forces. Compressive forces cause folding and faulting.

ATTENUATION FUNCTION RELATIONSHIP OF SUBDUCTION MECHANISM AND FAR FIELD EARTHQUAKE

Plate Tectonics. entirely rock both and rock

TSUNAMI AND EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY IN INDONESIA *

7 Ground Motion Models

A GLOBAL MODEL FOR AFTERSHOCK BEHAVIOUR

24. Ocean Basins p

Peak ground acceleration at surface for Mataram city with a return period of 2500 years using probabilistic method

Estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration for Delhi Region using Finsim, a Finite Fault Simulation Technique

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Quetta, Pakistan

A) B) C) D) 4. Which diagram below best represents the pattern of magnetic orientation in the seafloor on the west (left) side of the ocean ridge?

THE SEISMICITY OF THE CAMPANIAN PLAIN: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Seismic Activity and Tsunami Potential in Bali-Banda Basin

ANOTHER MEXICAN EARTHQUAKE! Magnitude 7.1, Tuesday Sept. 19, 2017

Beneath our Feet: The 4 Layers of the Earty by Kelly Hashway

Gravity Data Analysis and Modelling for Basin Sedimen of Eastern Java Blocks

Modelling Subduction Zone Seismogenic Hazards in Southeast Asia for Seismic Hazard Assessments

OCN 201 Seafloor Spreading and Plate Tectonics. Question

On the validity of time-predictable model for earthquake generation in north-east India

San Andreas Movie Can It Happen?

Rotation of the Principal Stress Directions Due to Earthquake Faulting and Its Seismological Implications

A Prototype of Strong Ground Motion Prediction Procedure for Intraslab Earthquake based on the Characterized Source Model

Date: / Page # Version A Page 1

Geology of the Hawaiian Islands

12. The diagram below shows the collision of an oceanic plate and a continental plate.

10. Paleomagnetism and Polar Wandering Curves.

Before Plate Tectonics: Theory of Continental Drift

BRIEFING MEMO ON RESERVOIR TRIGGERED SEISMICITY (RTS)

Earth s Geological Cycle

FORCES ON EARTH UNIT 3.2. An investigation into how Newton s Laws of Motion are applied to the tectonic activity on Earth.

NEW ATTENUATION FORMULA OF EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS PASSING THROUGH THE VOLCANIC FRONT

Geo-Marine Letters Volume 36, 2016, electronic supplementary material

Plates & Boundaries The earth's continents are constantly moving due to the motions of the tectonic plates.

Interpretation of Subsurface Geological Structure of Massepe Geothermal Area Using Resistivity Data

MMA Memo No National Radio Astronomy Observatory. Seismicity and Seismic Hazard at MMA site, Antofagasta, Chile SERGIO E.

How to Build a Mountain and other Geologic Structures. But first, questions

Coulomb stress changes due to Queensland earthquakes and the implications for seismic risk assessment

PROBABILISTIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF FAULT DISPLACEMENTS

3. PLATE TECTONICS LAST NAME (ALL IN CAPS): FIRST NAME: PLATES

PEAK GROUND HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIP FOR LOW MAGNITUDES AT SHORT DISTANCES IN SOUTH INDIAN REGION

RELATION BETWEEN RAYLEIGH WAVES AND UPLIFT OF THE SEABED DUE TO SEISMIC FAULTING

Chapter 2: Plate Tectonics: A Unifying Theory

FORCES ON EARTH. An investigation into how Newton s Laws of Motion are applied to the tectonic activity on Earth.

Updated Graizer-Kalkan GMPEs (GK13) Southwestern U.S. Ground Motion Characterization SSHAC Level 3 Workshop 2 Berkeley, CA October 23, 2013

Earthquake patterns in the Flinders Ranges - Temporary network , preliminary results

LETTER Earth Planets Space, 56, , 2004

Historical Maximum Seismic Intensity Maps in Japan from 1586 to 2004: Construction of Database and Application. Masatoshi MIYAZAWA* and Jim MORI

Activity Pacific Northwest Tectonic Block Model

Once you have opened the website with the link provided choose a force: Earthquakes

Multifractal Analysis of Seismicity of Kutch Region (Gujarat)

L wave Lahar Lava Magma

PHYSICAL GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (2 ND CANADIAN EDITION)

PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS AT GROUND SURFACE IN JAPAN BASED ON SITE EFFECTS ESTIMATED FROM OBSERVED STRONG-MOTION RECORDS

(1) Identify 5 major principles of relative dating? For each principle, describe how you tell what is younger and what is older.

Di#erences in Earthquake Source and Ground Motion Characteristics between Surface and Buried Crustal Earthquakes

The Frequency-Magnitude Distribution (FMD) by Aswan Seismic Network Earthquakes Catalog, Egypt

Global Tectonics. Kearey, Philip. Table of Contents ISBN-13: Historical perspective. 2. The interior of the Earth.

Chapter 2 Plate Tectonics and the Ocean Floor

Earth Movement and Resultant Landforms

Ground motion attenuation relations of small and moderate earthquakes in Sichuan region

Mountains are then built by deforming crust: Deformation & Mountain Building. Mountains form where stresses are high!

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of Nepal considering Uniform Density Model

Ground Motion Prediction Equations: Past, Present, and Future

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

OCN 201: Seafloor Spreading and Plate Tectonics I

Plate Tectonics Tutoiral. Questions. Teacher: Mrs. Zimmerman. Plate Tectonics and Mountains Practice Test

Dynamic Crust Practice

5. What is an earthquake 6. Indicate the approximate radius of the earth, inner core, and outer core.

A. rift valley B. deep trench C. volcanic cone D. uplifted mountain. A. a volcanic island arc B. a large watershed area

4 Deforming the Earth s Crust

RESPONSE SPECTRA RECOMMENDED FOR AUSTRALIA

INFLUENCE OF PLATE TECTONICS ON LOCATIONS OF GEOTHERMAL FIELDS. Hemendra Acharya Stone Webster Engineering Corporation Boston, MA U.S.A.

Comparisons of Ground Motions from the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake with Empirical Predictions Largely Based on Data from California

Liquefaction Potential Post-Earthquake in Yogyakarta

Chapter 2. Earthquake and Damage

Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment

A novel model for comparing Peak Ground Acceleration derived from three attenuation laws using an integrated GIS technique in Sabah area, Malaysia

Captain s Tryouts 2017

PROCEEDINGS, INDONESIAN PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION Thirty-Ninth Annual Convention and Exhibition, May 2015

Seismic Hazard Assessment Study for the Eastern Caribbean Islands

CHARACTERISTICS OF SOURCE SPECTRA OF SMALL AND LARGE INTERMEDIATE DEPTH EARTHQUAKES AROUND HOKKAIDO, JAPAN

Lithospheric plates. Geology of the Batemans Bay region. Tectonic processes

Ground displacement in a fault zone in the presence of asperities

What is an Earthquake?

Modelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events in the Wellington Region, New Zealand

Characterizing Earthquake Rupture Models for the Prediction of Strong Ground Motion

ENV-5004B/ENVK5005B. Figure 6. Student Registration No. ENV-5004B/ENVK5005B Version 2

Seismic hazard analysis of Tianjin area based on strong ground motion prediction

NAME HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #4 MATERIAL COVERS CHAPTERS 19, 20, 21, & 2

Transcription:

Determination of the seismicity and peak ground acceleration for Lombok island: an evaluation on tectonic setting Didi S. Agustawijaya 1,*, Heri Sulistiyono 1, and Ikhwan Elhuda 1,2 1 Post-Graduate Study Program in Civil Engineering, University of Mataram, Mataram 83125, Indonesia 2 Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, West Nusatenggara, Mataram 83125, Indonesia Abstract. Lombok Island is located in the Nusatenggara region, which is considered as one of the most active seismic parts of Indonesia. The determination of seismicity is crucial to the island, since Lombok Island is a relatively dense populated small island. Earthquakes that occurred around the island were generated by southern subduction mega-thrust and northern back-arc thrust. Mostly, distributions are concentrated on the north-west and south-east parts of Lombok Island. Probabilistic data analysis of 309 earthquake events during the period of 1973 2017 results in the Gutenberg-Richter parameters (a and b) of 3.62 and-0.53 indicating medium to high seismic activities. The Joyner-Boore attenuation relation seems to be suitable for seismic characteristics of the island. The reconstruction of tectonic setting indicates that the Benioff zone may develop at the depths of 150 km beneath the island causing horizontal tectonic forces working within the direction of N 171 0 E N 351 0 E. This could create a strike-slip fault on the crustal basement within the NE SW direction. 1 Introduction Lombok Island is located in the Nusatenggara region, which is one of the most active seismic parts in Indonesia. The island is tectonically located in the west of the Sunda Arc where the Australian Continental Plate subducts beneath the Eurasian Plate [1, 2], (Fig. 1). Earthquake events around the island were generated by two seismic sources: southern subduction mega-thrust and northern back-arc thrust. These two sources fashioned different types of seismic events. The subduction tends to generate deep events; conversely the backarc thrust tends to generate shallow seismic events. In terms of seismic events, the a- and b-values of the Gutenberg-Richter relation indicate the intensity and seismicity of the region being investigated [3]. These seismic parameters may be determined from the Gutenberg-Richter distribution graph showing the b-value of the linear slope of the N cumulative number magnitude, and the a-value of the slope line crossing the N cumulative number axis [3]. Based on the graph, the b-value could * Corresponding author: didiagustawijaya@unram.ac.id The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

be approaching 1, but it varies depending on many processes [4], such as fault heterogeneity [5]. In another way, the b-value may be determined by utilizing probabilistic approaches [6]. Fig. 1. Tectonic pattern of Indonesia [1, 2]. In seismic events, seismic energy is transferred from a fault surface to a recording instrument, for which a strong motion is recorded. The seismic energy from a point to the following point reaches some peak velocity, then slows to a stop, so that each point accelerates on the surface. Based on data collected, empirical equations may be employed [7]. However, the peak ground acceleration may depend on typical sources of earthquakes around the area. For the case of Lombok Island, it is crucial to evaluate the seismicity and calculating peak ground acceleration, as they could provide high impact to the island, since it is a densely populated small island [8]. The tectonic setting of Lombok Island is, therefore, reconstructed. 2 Method Earthquake catalogues used in the study were derived from the Indonesian Geophysics and Climatology Agency (BMKG) and the United State Geological Survey (USGS) during the period of 1973 2017. The centre point of investigation is the geographical coordinate (longitude and latitude) of 116.324944 and -8.650979 within a radius of 150 km of Lombok Island. Earthquake records were of magnitudes over 3.0 and at depths of 400 km. To determine seismicity of Lombok Island, the Gutenberg-Richter relationship was followed [3]: LLLLLLLLL (1) where N (M) is the number of earthquakes with magnitude greater than or equal to M. The a- value is a seismic intensity parameter depending on the number of earthquake events. The b-value is a seismicity parameter determined as the linear slope on the graph of the N (M) number and magnitude M. The b-value can also be determined by utilising the maximum likelihood method [4, 6]: L (2) M ave is the average magnitude, and M o is the minimum magnitude. 2

Three attenuation empirical relations of Esteva-Villaverde [9], McGuire [10], and Joyner-Boore [11] were applied to calculate peak ground acceleration (PGA). These three empirical relations may have different characteristics in use depending on typical earthquake patterns of the location being investigated [12]. As Lombok Island is influenced by three patterns of earthquakes: deep megathrust, deep Benioff and shallow back-arc thrust, three attenuation models could be applied, which may show a suitable pattern for Lombok Island, as follows: The Esteva-Villaverde attenuation model is one of the earliest models applied for shallow patterns: 600 0.6MMMM 0 (3) PGA in cm/sec 2 M S = surface magnitude R = hypocentre distance The McGuire attenuation model could be suitable for moderate to deep patterns:. 0.. (4) PGA in gal M S = surface magnitude R = (r 2 + H 2 ) 0.5 r = epicentre distance H = depth The Joyner-Boore may be suitable for moderate to shallow patterns: PGA in g r = (R 2 + 8 2 ) 0.5 R = hypocentre distance 0... (5) The PGA data obtained from the three attenuation models were, therefore, plotted on the geological structure map of Lombok Island to reconstruct the tectonic setting of the Island. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Earthquake distribution Earthquake data show that at least 309 earthquakes occurred during the period of 1973 2017 distributed around Lombok Island (Fig. 2). When geographical coordinates of Lombok Island are put on the centre point within a radius of 150 km, earthquakes seem to occur mostly at the north-west and north-east sides of the island (Fig. 3). Similar distribution tendencies were also indicated for Sumbawa Island [13]. 3

Fig. 2. Distribution of earthquakes during the period of 1973-2017. 150 N 100 Distance (km) 50 0 Lombok 50 150 100 50 0 50 100 150 Distance (km) Fig. 3. Distribution of earthquakes around Lombok Island within a radius of 150 km within the period of 1973-2017. These earthquake events had magnitudes of over 3.0 Richter scale (RC) at depths of 400 km, but most of them had magnitudes of over 4.0 RS (Fig. 4). The highest event was 6.3 RS at a depth of 33 km occurring at a distance of 29 km at the north-west of Lombok Island. 4

Depth (km) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 2 4 6 8 Magnitude (RS) Fig. 4. Magnitude vs depth of earthquakes around Lombok Island in the period of 1973-2017. 3.2 Seismicity Earthquake distribution data are plotted in Fig. 5. Probabilistic data analysis for magnitudes equal or over 4.0 RS shows that the least square method results in a-and b-values of 3.62 and -0.53, while the maximum likelihood method results in a b-value of -0.66. Those values indicate medium to high categories of seismic events [4]. 1000 100 Log Number 10 1 3 4 5 6 7 Magnitude (RS) Fig. 5. Earthquake data distribution of the Gutenberg-Richter relation. However, seismicity varies depending on many processes, such as fault heterogeneity [14] and the stress level imposed on rocks that depend on micro fracturing [15]. An area with a low b-value has a relatively low potential for a big earthquake compared to an area with a high b-value. This is called temporal variations in b-values [16], and their relations to the forthcoming damaging earthquakes have been discussed by many authors [16, 17]. Many cases show that the b-value decreases before large earthquakes and the decrease even occurred for several years before large earthquakes occur [17]. 5

3.3 Peak ground acceleration Three empirical equations were utilized. The Esteva-Villaverde empirical equation produced low PGA values among three empirical equations (Fig. 6). The PGA values are between 0.003g and 0.11g. The McGuire empirical relation shows the PGA values between 0.01g and 0.72g; while, the Joyner-Boore empirical relation shows the PGA values between 0.003g and 0.28g. PGA (g) 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Lombok Fig. 6. Empirical PGA values for Lombok Island. 50 0 50 100 150 Distance (km) According to Hadley et al. [7], earthquake ground motions are influenced by source, propagation, and site effects. Shallow back-arc up thrust seems to be dominant in influencing seismic occurrences in Lombok Island, as it is close to the island. The Esteva- Villaverde equation may possibly be effective within a distance of less than 150 km [18], and also, the equation tends to have less deviation in value compared to the other two equations. However, as suggested by Boore [19], ground motion prediction equation should provide reasonable predictions for insufficient data, but predicts engineering important situations; so the Joyner-Boore equation may indicate the influence of magnitude, distance, and site characterization that is suitable to Lombok Island. The PGA data of the Joyner- Boore were then plotted on the map, as can be seen in Fig. 7, in which the maximum PGA data are concentrated on the south-east part of the island. N Esteva Villaverde McGuire Joyner Boore Fig. 7. PGA values estimated from the Joyner-Boore equation for Lombok Island. 6

3.4 Tectonic setting As discussed earlier, the tectonic pattern of Lombok Island is developed by the south subduction mega-thrust and north back-arc thrust, as a consequence of the compression between the Australian Continental Plate and the Eurasian Plate [1]. The south subduction tends to produce deep earthquakes; whereas the north back-arc thrust tends to produce shallow earthquakes (Fig. 8).The Benioff zone may develop at depths of 150 km, similar to the so-called Benioff-Wadati zone by Rachmat et al. [2]. The zone may be inclined with an angle of 67 0 downward north (Fig. 9). 0 Lombok N 50 100 Subduction megathrust Shallow back arc thrust Depth (km) 150 200 250 300 Subduction benioff 350 400 50 0 50 100 150 Distance (km) Fig. 8. Distribution of earthquake events on the tectonic setting of Lombok Island. Fig. 9. Reconstructed tectonic model for Lombok Island. Based on the geological map of Lombok [20], the island comprises of Tertiary (Early Miocene) until Holocene sedimentary rocks, and intrusive andesitic igneous rocks. The oldest rock formation is the Pengulung Formation of Late Oligocene-Early Miocene sedimentary rocks, overlaid by the Kawangan Formation of Middle Miocene sandstone. Both formations are located in the south where intrusive igneous rocks of Middle Miocene can also be found. The Ekas Formation of Late Miocene limestone overlaid the Pengulung and Kawangan Formations. In the north, young volcanic rocks dominate the geology of the island, including the Kalipalung, Kalibabak, and Lekopiko Formations. When PGA values are plotted on the geological map, higher PGA values are concentrated on volcanic breccias of the Kalibabak and Pengulung Formations. However, there is no typical pattern between rock formations and PGA values. Thick sedimentary rock materials cover mostly parts of the island, such domination may be understandable since Mount Rinjani, located in the north, has been an active volcano in the history of 7

Lombok Island [21]. The pattern seems to follow sedimentary processes of erupted materials of the Rinjani volcano. Geological structures seem, however, to be visibly significant at the south part, as a lot of alignments are recognized in this part of the island. When the geological structure map is overlaid with the PGA map, there is a geological structure pattern that can be displayed. Structure may follow the model of Harding [22]. The geological structure of Lombok Island seems to develop on a basement sinistral strike-slip fault as the main structure in the direction of NW - SE, then minor shear strike slip faults develop in the direction of SW NE (Fig. 10). From structural patterns, a direction of main forces working at Lombok Island can be drawn on N 171 0 E N 351 0 E. This direction is in line with the regional tectonic pattern of the Sunda Arc [1]. Fig. 10. Geological structure of Lombok Island. 4 Conclusions Lombok Island is categorized into medium to high seismicity. The attenuation of Joyner- Boore may represent ground motion of seismic event characteristics of the island, since the deep Benioff mixed with shallow back-arc thrust earthquakes dominantly occur around the island. Sinistral strike-slip fault may develop on the crustal basement in the direction of NE SW caused by main horizontal tectonic forces working in the direction of N 171 0 E N 351 0 E. References 1. W. Hamilton, Earthquake map of Indonesian region, U.S. Geo. Surv., Misc. Inv. Serial Map 1-875-C, scale 1:5.000.000, (1974). 2. H. Rachmat, M. Rosana, A. Wirakusumah, G. Jabbar, Ind. J. on Geos. 3 (2), 107-126, (2016). 3. B. Gutenberg, C. Richter, Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, Princeton Uni. Press, New Jersey, pp. 295, (1949). 4. W. Marzocchi, L. Sandri, Annals of Geophy.,46 (6), 1271-1282, (2003). 5. K. Mogi, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 40, 125-173, (1962). 6. T. Utsu, Geophy. Bull. Hokkaido Uni., 13, 99 103, (1965). 8

7. D. Hadley, D. Helmberger. J. Orcutt, Bull. of the Seismol. Soc. of America, 72(3), 959-979, (1982). 8. D. Agustawijaya, Appl. Mech. &Mat., 845, 106-110, (2016). Doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.845.106. 9. L. Esteva, R. Villaverde, Proc. 5 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,2, 2586 2596, (1973). 10. R. McGuire, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 5, 211 234. 1977 11. W. Joyner, D.Boore, Proceedings of Earthquake Engineering& Soil Dynamics II. Geotech. Div., ASCE, 43 102, (1988). 12. J. Douglas, Ground motion prediction equations 1964-2017, Report, Dep. of Civ. and Env. Eng., Uni. of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom, (2017). 13. B. Sunardi, M. Istikomah, Sulastri, Jur. Ris. Geof. Ind.,1(1), 23-28, (2017), (in Indonesian). 14. K. Mogi, Bull. of Earthq. Res. Inst. Uni. of Tokyo, 40, 831-883, (1962). 15. C. Scholz, Bull. of the Seism. Soc. of America, 58(3), 1117-1130, (1968). 16. Y. Shi, B. Bolt, Bull. of the Seism. Soc. of America, 72(5), 1677-1687, (1982). 17. Y. Tsukakoshi, K. Shimazaki, Earth Planets Space, 60, 915 924, (2008). 18. C. Chintanapakdee1, M. Naguit, M. Charoenyuth, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, Oct. (2008). 19. D. Boore, Ground Motion Prediction Equations: Past, Present, and Future, The 2014 William B. Joyner Lecture, the SMIP15 meeting, Davis, California, 22 October (2015). 20. S. Mangga, S. Atmawinata, B. Hermanto, B. Setyogroho, Geological Map of The Lombok Sheet, West Nusa Tenggara, scale 1:250.000. Geol. Res. Dev. Centre, Bandung, (1994). 21. F. Lavigne, J. Degeai, J. Komorowski, S. Guillet, V. Robert, P. Lahitte, P. Wassmer, Proc. of the Nat. Aca. of Sci., 110(42), 16742-16747, (2013). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1307520110. 22. T. Harding, J. Lowell, the Amer. Ass. of Petr. Geol. Bull., 63(7), 1016-1058, (1979). 9