FINM 6900 Finance Theory

Similar documents
1. Consider a pure-exchange economy with stochastic endowments. The state of the economy

Examples of Dynamic Programming Problems

Lecture Notes 5: Investment

1 Consumption and Risky Assets

3.1.3 INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION: DISCRETE TIME PROBLEMS. A. The Hamiltonian and First-Order Conditions in a Finite Time Horizon

Macroeconomic Theory Ph.D. Qualifying Examination Fall 2005 ANSWER EACH PART IN A SEPARATE BLUE BOOK. PART ONE: ANSWER IN BOOK 1 WEIGHT 1/3

Cooperative Ph.D. Program in School of Economic Sciences and Finance QUALIFYING EXAMINATION IN MACROECONOMICS. August 8, :45 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Introduction to choice over time

Online Appendix to Solution Methods for Models with Rare Disasters

Essential Microeconomics : OPTIMAL CONTROL 1. Consider the following class of optimization problems

BU Macro BU Macro Fall 2008, Lecture 4

Cash Flow Valuation Mode Lin Discrete Time

SZG Macro 2011 Lecture 3: Dynamic Programming. SZG macro 2011 lecture 3 1

A New-Keynesian Model

Reserves measures have an economic component eg. what could be extracted at current prices?

Midterm Exam. Macroeconomic Theory (ECON 8105) Larry Jones. Fall September 27th, Question 1: (55 points)

Lecture Notes 3: Quantitative Analysis in DSGE Models: New Keynesian Model

ANSWERS TO EVEN NUMBERED EXERCISES IN CHAPTER 6 SECTION 6.1: LIFE CYCLE CONSUMPTION AND WEALTH T 1. . Let ct. ) is a strictly concave function of c

Introduction D P. r = constant discount rate, g = Gordon Model (1962): constant dividend growth rate.

Economics 8105 Macroeconomic Theory Recitation 6

Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination

1 Answers to Final Exam, ECN 200E, Spring

Problem Set 5. Graduate Macro II, Spring 2017 The University of Notre Dame Professor Sims

E β t log (C t ) + M t M t 1. = Y t + B t 1 P t. B t 0 (3) v t = P tc t M t Question 1. Find the FOC s for an optimum in the agent s problem.

This document was generated at 7:34 PM, 07/27/09 Copyright 2009 Richard T. Woodward

Modern Dynamic Asset Pricing Models

Problem 1 / 25 Problem 2 / 20 Problem 3 / 10 Problem 4 / 15 Problem 5 / 30 TOTAL / 100

Rational Bubbles in Non-Linear Business Cycle Models. Robert Kollmann Université Libre de Bruxelles & CEPR

Economics 6130 Cornell University Fall 2016 Macroeconomics, I - Part 2

This document was generated at 1:04 PM, 09/10/13 Copyright 2013 Richard T. Woodward. 4. End points and transversality conditions AGEC

(MS, ) Problem 1

13.3 Term structure models

Optimal Investment, Consumption and Retirement Decision with Disutility and Borrowing Constraints

Solutions to Assignment 1

Solutions Problem Set 3 Macro II (14.452)

A Dynamic Model of Economic Fluctuations

T. J. HOLMES AND T. J. KEHOE INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PAYMENTS THEORY FALL 2011 EXAMINATION

Liquidity and Bank Capital Requirements

Appendix to The Macroeconomics of Trend Inflation Journal of Economic Literature, September 2014

1 Price Indexation and In ation Inertia

( ) (, ) F K L = F, Y K N N N N. 8. Economic growth 8.1. Production function: Capital as production factor

Macroeconomics I, UPF Professor Antonio Ciccone SOLUTIONS PROBLEM SET 1

Lecture 10 Estimating Nonlinear Regression Models

Transform Techniques. Moment Generating Function

Some Basic Information about M-S-D Systems

Problem set 3: Endogenous Innovation - Solutions

Lecture 20: Riccati Equations and Least Squares Feedback Control

Problem Set on Differential Equations

The Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model

Policy regimes Theory

Full file at

LABOR MATCHING MODELS: BASIC DSGE IMPLEMENTATION APRIL 12, 2012

CHAPTER 12 DIRECT CURRENT CIRCUITS

Nontradable Goods and the Real Exchange Rate

Optimal Consumption and Investment Portfolio in Jump markets. Optimal Consumption and Portfolio of Investment in a Financial Market with Jumps

2017 3rd International Conference on E-commerce and Contemporary Economic Development (ECED 2017) ISBN:

Financial Econometrics Kalman Filter: some applications to Finance University of Evry - Master 2

O Q L N. Discrete-Time Stochastic Dynamic Programming. I. Notation and basic assumptions. ε t : a px1 random vector of disturbances at time t.

A User s Guide to Solving Real Business Cycle Models. by a single representative agent. It is assumed that both output and factor markets are

Economics 602 Macroeconomic Theory and Policy Final Exam Suggested Solutions Professor Sanjay Chugh Spring 2011

5450 recursive competitive equilibrium

Chapter 5. Heterocedastic Models. Introduction to time series (2008) 1

1. An introduction to dynamic optimization -- Optimal Control and Dynamic Programming AGEC

Finance Research Letters. Maximizing utility of consumption subject to a constraint on the probability of lifetime ruin

SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR EXISTENCE SOLUTION OF LINEAR TWO-POINT BOUNDARY PROBLEM IN MINIMIZATION OF QUADRATIC FUNCTIONAL

Solutionbank Edexcel AS and A Level Modular Mathematics

Optimal Intertemporal Consumption under Uncertainty 1

The Asymptotic Behavior of Nonoscillatory Solutions of Some Nonlinear Dynamic Equations on Time Scales

Problem 1 / 25 Problem 2 / 25 Problem 3 / 35 Problem 4 / 20 TOTAL / 100

Lecture 4 Notes (Little s Theorem)

Simulating models with heterogeneous agents

OPTIMAL CONSUMPTION AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS UNDER TIME-VARYING RISK ATTITUDES

Appendix 14.1 The optimal control problem and its solution using

Graduate Macro Theory II: Notes on Neoclassical Growth Model

The consumption-based determinants of the term structure of discount rates: Corrigendum. Christian Gollier 1 Toulouse School of Economics March 2012

Recursive Least-Squares Fixed-Interval Smoother Using Covariance Information based on Innovation Approach in Linear Continuous Stochastic Systems

The Brock-Mirman Stochastic Growth Model

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Seminar 4: Hotelling 2

THE BELLMAN PRINCIPLE OF OPTIMALITY

Notes for Lecture 17-18

Technical Appendix. Political Uncertainty and Risk Premia

Economic Growth and the Evolution of Preferences under Uncertainty. Stuart McDonald, Rodney Beard, and John Foster

RISK-NEUTRAL VALUATION UNDER FUNDING COSTS AND COLLATERALIZATION

RANDOM LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS AND TRANSVERSALITY

EXCHANGE RATE ECONOMICS LECTURE 3 ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION AND EXCHANGE RATES. A. Portfolio Shifts Model and the Role of Order Flow

Reading from Young & Freedman: For this topic, read sections 25.4 & 25.5, the introduction to chapter 26 and sections 26.1 to 26.2 & 26.4.

Decentralizing the Growth Model. 5/4/96 version

An Introduction to Backward Stochastic Differential Equations (BSDEs) PIMS Summer School 2016 in Mathematical Finance.

On a Discrete-In-Time Order Level Inventory Model for Items with Random Deterioration

dy dx = xey (a) y(0) = 2 (b) y(1) = 2.5 SOLUTION: See next page

A Note on Raising the Mandatory Retirement Age and. Its Effect on Long-run Income and Pay As You Go (PAYG) Pensions

Notes on Kalman Filtering

Transaction-Cost-Conscious Pairs Trading via Approximate Dynamic Programming

Lecture 2 October ε-approximation of 2-player zero-sum games

IMPLICIT AND INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREMS PAUL SCHRIMPF 1 OCTOBER 25, 2013

Inflation-Targeting, Price-Path Targeting and Indeterminacy

Dynamic firm profit-maximization problem. max ( ( )) Total output sold in perfectlycompetitive

Problem Set 1 "Working with the Solow model"

Different assumptions in the literature: Wages/prices set one period in advance and last for one period

Transcription:

FINM 6900 Finance Theory Universiy of Queensland Lecure Noe 4 The Lucas Model 1. Inroducion In his lecure we consider a simple endowmen economy in which an unspecified number of raional invesors rade asses in securiies markes. All invesors derive uiliy from a single consumpion good, and each invesor solves a dynamic porfolio problem o arrive a an opimal holding of securiies. Thus, he invesor s problem is o imize lifeime uiliy of consumpion subjec o a series of one-period budge consrains. There are no ransacions coss, shor sales consrains, or oher barriers o rade. Each invesor is free o adjus he composiion of his or her porfolio a any poin in ime. 2. The Invesor s Problem We se he problem up as follows. subjec o where C X j + C = W + E B i U(C +i ) i=0 (1) X j 1( + ) (2) 1. E denoes he expecaion aken wih respec o he informaion available a ime. 2. X j is he amoun of securiy j purchased a ime. 3. is he price of securiy j a ime. 1

4. W is he represenaive invesor s wealh a ime. 5. C is he represenaive invesor s consumpion a ime. 6. is he dividend paid by securiy j a ime. 7. B is he ime discoun facor. Noe ha invesors are allowed o rade a each poin in ime. The budge consrain says ha payoff on he porfolio, X j 1( + ), plus he endowed wealh, W, is allocaed beween curren consumpion, C, and invesmen in he securiies marke, X j. The budge consrain in (2) can be solved for C, C = W + X j 1( + ) X j, (3) and he represenaive individual s problem in equaion (1) can be wrien as C L = E U + BU +. Subsiuing for C using equaion (3) yields X L = E U W + X 1( j + ) + BU W +1 + +, wih X j N as he new se of choice variables. X j ( +1 + +1) X j X+1 j +1 Differeniaing wih respec o X j gives he following firs order condiion. E U = E BU ( +1 + δ+1) j j. 2

Solving for or dividing by we find ha BU = E ( U +1 + +1) BU 1 = E (1 + R j U +1) This resul is known as he Lucas model. j, (4) j. (4 ) 3. The Presen Value of Dividends Version Equaion (4) implies ha BU = E U +1 + BU U +1. (5) and also ha BU +1 = E +1 U ( +2 + δ+2) j. (6) We noe ha BU BU E E +1 U ( +2 + δ+2) j = E U ( +2 + δ+2) j. by he law of ieraed expecaions. Thus, subsiuing (6) ino (5) gives BU = E U +1 + BU ( BU ) U U ( +2 + δ+2) j, or BU = E U d j +1 + B2 U U If we coninue o subsiue for P +i T i=2, we obain = E T B i U (C +i ) U Le T and noe ha if 0 < B < 1 hen B T U (C +T ) lim T U The end resul is = E +2 + B2 U U +2. +1 + BT U (C +T ) U +T. +T B i U (C +i ) U +i 3 0. j. (7)

4. Relaion o Sae Preference Theory In our discussion of sae preference heory, we derived he pricing relaion T S 0 = Φ s d j s =1 s=1 where d j s denoes he payoff on asse j a ime in sae s. Because he invesor could only rade a ime = 0 in his model, i is naural inerpre he payoff d j s as he dividend on asse j a ime in sae s. Thus, a ime, he sae preference model implies ha T S = Φ +i,s δ+i,s, j s=1 or, using our expression for he sae prices, = T S s=1 j, π +i,s B i U (C +i,s ) U +i,s If we assume ha he invesor s probabiliy assessmens are condiional on he informaion available a ime we have T B i U (C +i ) = E U +i j. (8) Le T go o infiniy and we ge he presen value version of he Lucas model. The saring ime was arbirary, so equaion (8) also implies ha T B i U (C +1+i ) +1 = E +1 U +1+i j. (9) Togeher, equaions (8) and (9) imply ha BU = E ( U +1 + +1). (10) Proof Noe ha equaion (8) implies BU = E U +1 + BU U Apply he law of ieraed expecaions o ge BU = E U T +1 + BU T E U +1 Now subsiue for +1 using equaion (9) BU = E U 4 j. B i U (C +1+i ) U +1+i. B i U (C +1+i ) U +1+i. ( +1 + δ+1) j. (11)

5. The Disribuion of Reurns Consider an economy wih 1 securiy and a represenaive invesor. From equaion (7) we have P = E B i U (C +i ) δ +i U Assume U = ln and noe ha opimal consumpion will equal he dividend paid by he securiy o ge Thus we have and which implies B i δ P = E δ +i δ +i P = E B i δ P = E δ δ+1 P +1 = E +1 P = δ P +1 = δ +1 and ln(p +1 ) ln(p ) = ln(δ +1 ) ln(δ ). Suppose ha he dividend process akes he form ln(δ +1 ) = µ + ln(δ ) + ɛ +1. We hen have ha ln(p +1 ) ln(p ) = µ + ɛ +1, which is a random walk in reurns. Alernaively, suppose he dividend process is ln(δ +1 ) = µ + ρ ln(δ ) + ɛ +1. The resul is ha ln(p +1 ) ln(p ) = µ + (ρ 1) ln(δ ) + ɛ +1, which implies ha reurns follow a firs-order auoregressive process. 5