Low-frequency tremor signals from a hydraulic fracture treatment in northeast British Columbia, Canada

Similar documents
Magnitude, scaling, and spectral signature of tensile microseisms

Broadband microseismic observations from a Montney hydraulic fracture treatment, northeastern B.C., Canada

Hoadley Microseismic Experiment: Reprocessing and characterization of long-duration tremor signals

Absolute strain determination from a calibrated seismic field experiment

Comparison of Microseismic Results in Complex Geologies Reveals the Effect of Local Stresses on Fracture Propagation

Estimating energy balance for hydraulic fracture stimulations: Lessons Learned from Basel

Microseismic data illuminate fractures in the Montney

Microseismic Monitoring Shale Gas Plays: Advances in the Understanding of Hydraulic Fracturing 20 MAR 16 HANNAH CHITTENDEN

Microseismic Aids In Fracturing Shale By Adam Baig, Sheri Bowman and Katie Jeziorski

Extending the magnitude range of seismic reservoir monitoring by Utilizing Hybrid Surface Downhole Seismic Networks

Analytical Stress Modeling for Mine related Microseismicity

Calculation of Focal mechanism for Composite Microseismic Events

Abstracts ESG Solutions

Passive seismic monitoring in unconventional oil and gas

Microseismicity applications in hydraulic fracturing monitoring

SHALE GAS AND HYDRAULIC FRACTURING

This paper was prepared for presentation at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference held in Denver, Colorado, USA, August 2014.

Seismic Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing Activity at the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environment Laboratory (MSEEL) Site, West Virginia

Multicomponent seismic surveys at Sibbald Flats, Alberta

SCEK Report on Phase I ( ) Induced Seismicity Monitoring Project (ISMP) Carlos Salas, VP Oil & Gas, Geoscience BC

Focal Mechanism Analysis of a Multi-lateral Completion in the Horn River Basin

Microseismic Geomechanical Modelling of Asymmetric Upper Montney Hydraulic Fractures

Fracture Geometry from Microseismic. Norm Warpinski

An Open Air Museum. Success breeds Success. Depth Imaging; Microseismics; Dip analysis. The King of Giant Fields WESTERN NEWFOUNDLAND:

Seismic Efficiency, Overshoot and Enhanced Dynamic Weaking of Fractures Associated with Stimulation in Heavy Oil Reservoirs

GSA DATA REPOSITORY

Microseismic Monitoring of a Multi-Stage Frac In the Bakken Formation, SE Saskatchewan

Nanometrics Posthole Seismometers. World Class Performance

Monte Carlo simulations for analysis and prediction of nonstationary magnitude-frequency distributions in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis

Insights from joint interpretation of dense array observations and 3D multicomponent seismic: The ToC2ME experiment, Fox Creek, AB

Characteristics of the Triassic Upper Montney Formation (Unit C), West-Central Area, Alberta

Duvernay Fracturing: From Microseismic Monitoring to Unconventional Fracture Model Construction

Research Themes in Stimulation Geomechanics. How do we optimize slickwater frac ing?

Azimuthal Velocity Analysis of 3D Seismic for Fractures: Altoment-Bluebell Field

A 3D seismic survey for mapping shallow targets

Fault Reactivation Predictions: Why Getting the In-situ Stresses Right Matters

Unconventional reservoir characterization using conventional tools

Shallow P and S velocity structure, Red Deer, Alberta

EB-2012O-0451, EB , EB : TransCanada Supplemental Evidence pp /17

Have we run out of conventional plays in the WCSB?

Interpretation of baseline surface seismic data at the Violet Grove CO 2 injection site, Alberta

BC-OGRIS Report for Year 5 of the. Induced Seismicity Monitoring Project (ISMP)

Theory. Summary. Introduction

Finite element modelling of fault stress triggering due to hydraulic fracturing

Microseismic monitoring is a valuable

An Investigation on the Effects of Different Stress Regimes on the Magnitude Distribution of Induced Seismic Events

TexNet and CISR: An Update on Monitoring and Understanding Seismicity in Texas

Seismic techniques for imaging fractures, cracks and faults in the Earth. Michael Kendall

Optimizing Completions within the Montney Resource Play Mike Seifert, Mark Lenko, Joshua Lee Canadian Discovery Ltd.

Sequence Biostratigraphy and Depositional Modelling of the Pennsylvanian-Permian Belloy Formation Peace River Embayment, Alberta Canada

Characterization of Induced Seismicity in a Petroleum Reservoir: A Case Study

Application of nonlinear time-lapse AVO to the Pouce Coupe data set. Presented by Shahin Jabbari Supervisor Kris Innanen

Passive seismic monitoring at a CO2 injection site, Violet Grove, Alberta, Canada

DISCRETE FRACTURE NETWORK MODELLING OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN A STRUCTURALLY CONTROLLED AREA OF THE MONTNEY FORMATION, BC

Reservoir simulation and feasibility study for seismic monitoring at CaMI.FRS, Newell County, Alberta

F021 Detetection of Mechanical Failure During Hyraulic Fracturing Through Passive Seismic Microseismic Monitoring

Pore-scale variability and fluid distributions in Montney Formation: New insights from three-dimensional reservoir characterization and modeling

Risk Evaluation. Todd Shipman PhD, Alberta Geological Survey/Alberta Energy Regulator November 17 th,2017 Induced Seismicity Workshop, Yellowknife NWT

Monitoring induced microseismic events usually

KEY CONTROLLING FACTORS OF SHALEGAS INDUCED SEISMICITY

A review of friction laws and their application for simulation of microseismicity prior to hydraulic fracturing

Role of lithological layering on spatial variation of natural and induced fractures in hydraulic fracture stimulation

What Can Microseismic Tell Us About Hydraulic Fracturing?

Investigation of long period amplifications in the Greater Bangkok basin by microtremor observations

Correlating seismic wave velocity measurements with mining activities at Williams Mine

3D Finite Element Modeling of fault-slip triggering caused by porepressure

Seismic methods in heavy-oil reservoir monitoring

3D geological model for a gas-saturated reservoir based on simultaneous deterministic partial stack inversion.

Time-lapse seismic modeling of CO 2 sequestration at Quest CCS project

Acquisition and preliminary analysis of the Castle Mountain shallow VSP dataset

Geologic influence on variations in oil and gas production from the Cardium Formation, Ferrier Oilfield, west-central Alberta, Canada

Geomechanical Controls on Hydraulic Fracturing in the Bakken Fm, SK

Final Report for DOEI Project: Bottom Interaction in Long Range Acoustic Propagation

Controls on facies distributions in the Charlie Lake Formation, Peace River Arch, Alberta

Overview of Selected Shale Plays in New Mexico*

Summary. Introduction

Reprinted From. Volume 03 Issue 03-JulY 2010

The Stability Of Fault Systems In The South Shore Of The. St. Lawrence Lowlands Of Québec Implications For Shale Gas Development

Envelope of Fracture Density

Demystifying Tight-gas Reservoirs using Multi-scale Seismic Data

Investigation of Devonian Unconformity Surface Using Legacy Seismic Profiles, NE Alberta

Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated With Oil & Gas Development

Overview of moment-tensor inversion of microseismic events

Oil and natural gas production from shale formations

Seismic applications in coalbed methane exploration and development

Search and Discovery Article # (2009) Posted July 25, Abstract

Mapping Basement Structures in the Peace River Arch of Alberta Using Monogenic Signal Decomposition of Magnetic Data

QUALITATIVE INTERPRETATION OF POTENTIAL FIELD PROFILES: SOUTHERN NECHAKO BASIN

Buried-valley Aquifers: Delineation and Characterization from Reflection Seismic and Core Data at Caledon East, Ontario

Economic Geology Unconventional Energy Research

KECK REALTIME SEISMIC/GEODETIC BOREHOLE STATION. WHOI Ocean Bottom Seismograph Laboratory

RESULTS OF STIMULATION TREATMENTS AT THE GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH WELLS IN GROß SCHÖNEBECK/GERMANY

Microseismic Monitoring of CO 2 Injection at the Penn West Enhanced Oil Recovery Pilot Project, Canada: Implications for Detection of Wellbore Leakage

S037 Recent Low Frequency Passive Seismic Experiments in Abu Dhabi SUMMARY

SPE MS. Abstract. Introduction

Presentation to the NATIONAL BUYER / SELLER FORUM March 24, Brad J. Hayes Petrel Robertson Consulting Ltd.

Geological & Geophysical Interpretation of ZTEM EM and Magnetic Survey. Kemess Project, BC. for AuRico Metals Inc. September, 2016 Nicole Pendrigh

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

This paper was prepared for presentation at the Americas Unconventional Resources Conference held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 5 7 June 2012.

Applications of finite-difference modelling to coalscale seismic exploration

Transcription:

Low-frequency tremor signals from a hydraulic fracture treatment in northeast British Columbia, Canada David W. Eaton*, Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada eatond@ucalgary.ca and Mirko van der Baan, and Jean-Baptiste Tary, Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Kim Pike, Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Summary The Rolla Microseismic Experiment was undertaken August 7-28, 2011 to record a multistage hydraulic fracture stimulation of a Montney gas reservoir in northeastern British Columbia. The field deployment included a 6-level array of 4.5 Hz geophones with downhole digitization, a set of 22 portable broadband seismograph systems, and a 12-channel surface array of 10-Hz geophones. The scientific objectives of this project are to compare surface and downhole microseismic recordings in order to assess the general suitability of surface microseismic acquisition for the Montney play in northeastern BC, and to investigate low-frequency characteristics of microseismic events induced by hydraulic fracture stimulation, with particular focus on a recently discovered class of long-period long-duration (LPLD) events. By analogy with tectonic tremor, LPLD events have been interpreted as slow-slip processes along pre-existing fractures. Although we find that they are less common in the Montney than in the Barnett, results confirm the presence of some LPLD events, which are dominated by signals from 5-50 Hz. Other signals recorded during the experiment include local and regional earthquakes, persistent tremor-like signals and numerous high-frequency (> 100 Hz) microseismic events with moment magnitudes ranging from 2.3 to 1.4 to distances up to 1.2 km. In addition, perf shots were well recorded to distances of about 2 km, and were used to estimate Q. Noise characteristics of the surface sites were also extensively studied. Introduction A project to acquire microseismic data (Rolla Microseismic Experiment) was undertaken August 7-29, 2011 in northeast B.C., Canada. Multistage frac treatments at a depth of ~1950m in two horizontal wells were recorded using both surface and borehole sensors (Figure 1). The borehole toolstring was deployed in a depth range of 1670-1830 m and consisted of a 6-level array of 4.5 Hz geophones with downhole digitization, with sensitivity of 4500 V/m/s. Surface sensors included 22 broadband seismometers (Trillium Compact seismometers and Taurus digitizers) deployed in 7 mini-arrays over an area of ~ 0.5 km 2, and a 12-channel array with a mix of vertical and 3-C geophones. Acquisition parameters are summarized in Table 1. The approximate minimum recording frequencies of the equipment are: broadband seismometers, 0.0083 Hz (= 120 s); borehole sensors, 0.1 Hz; short-period surface array, 5 Hz. Taking advantage of this unusually broad range of recording frequencies, a primary objective of the experiment was detection of long-period, long-duration (LPLD) microseismicity (Das and Zoback, 2011), together with any associated ultralow frequency phenomena. By analogy with tectonic tremor, LPLD events have been interpreted as slow-slip rupture along pre-existing fracture surfaces. GeoConvention 2013: Integration 1

Figure 1: Location and layout for the Rolla Microseismic Experiment. Manufacturer Type of Sensor Number of Sensors Sample Rate (ms) Start/end dates Sensor spacing Archival Format Spectraseis 4.5 Hz 3C geophones 6 0.5 Aug. 15-18 and Aug. 21-25 32 m (borehole) PSEGY Nanometrics Broadband seismometer (Trillium Compact) 21 2.0 ~ Aug. 8 to Aug. 27 50 m (4- element surface array) mini-seed ESG 10 Hz geophones (mix of Z and 3C) 8 0.5 Aug. 15-18 20 m (8- element surface array) SEGY Table 1: Summary of instrumentation and data acquisition parameters. GeoConvention 2013: Integration 2

Geological Setting Significant gas reserves are hosted by the Triassic Montney Formation in northeastern British Columbia and northwestern Alberta. Although estimates of natural gas in place are highly variable, ranging from 80 to 700 Tcf, in recent years production has increased dramatically to over 400MMcf/d (Walsh et al., 2006). The Triassic Montney Formation is an extensive siliciclastic-dominant unit that occurs from west-central Alberta to northeast British Columbia (Dixon, 2000). In the area of this study, it is overlain by the Triassic Doig Formation and underlain by the Permian Belloy Formation. The Montney contains significant reserves of gas in Alberta and British Columbia. The depositional environment ranges from shallow-water shoreface sands to offshore marine muds (NEB, 2009). The Montney consists of interbedded shale, siltstone and sandstone layers; the dominant lithology is shale and silty shale (Dixon, 2000). Thickness can range up to 300m, while porosity is very low, ranging from 1.0-6.0% (NEB, 2009). Examples As described by Das and Zoback (2011), LPLD events from the Barnett shale are prominent in the 20-80 Hz frequency band. These LPDL events are ~ 60s in duration and are strikingly similar in character to tectonic tremor. In the present microseismic survey from northern Canada, data from the treatment stage closest to the monitor well (~ 400m) contain numerous microseismic event detections, including low-frequency events. Time-frequency analysis using a short-time Fourier transform (STFT), however, reveals relatively few LPLD-like signals. We observed a diverse variety of other low-frequency phenomena, however, that may provide important clues about deformation processes linked to fluid injection. Figure 2: Treatment curves and time-frequency plot for stage H1-3. Top panel shows treatment curves; P is treatment pressure (MPa), R is slurry rate 10 (m 3 /s), C is proppant concentration 20 (kg/m 3 ). Lower panel shows frequency-time analysis for vertical-component recording for one receiver level, using the short-time Fourier transform. Dashed boxes show examples presented below. GeoConvention 2013: Integration 3

Our data exhibit high-amplitude signals in the 8-10 Hz band. Although it is not clear what role pumpgenerated noise at the treatment location might play in modulating these signals, peak amplitudes in this band vary slightly in frequency and build gradually in amplitude over the duration of fluid injection (Figure 2). We also observe instances of narrow-band signals with a characteristic frequency of ~ 15 Hz (e.g., Figures 3-5). These signals are monotonic and have been interpreted as resonance of fluid-filled cracks or successions of small repetitive events (Tary and van der Baan, 2012). In many cases, the 15-Hz tremors appear to be precursors to high-frequency microseismic events, suggesting a possible causal link. We have also detected several instances of discrete microseismic events with unusually low frequency (Figure 6). We are currently investigating if the frequency content of these events could reflect low-velocity rupture processes associated with tensile failure (Walter and Brune, 1993). Figure 3: Example of low-frequency tremor and high-frequency microseismic events, from stage H1-3. Note increasing high-frequency content of the 3 events. Figure 4: Example of low-frequency tremor and high-frequency microseismic events, from stage H1-3. GeoConvention 2013: Integration 4

Figure 5: Example of low-frequency tremor and high-frequency microseismic events, from stage H2-2. Figure 6: Example of low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) microseismic events, from stage H1-3. Noise characteristics of the surface sites were also extensively studied. Non-coherent noise from the surface sites was used to assess installation issues such as tilt and sensor performance. Other qualitycontrol measures included computation of time-domain alignment matrices for mini-arrays, and calculation of power spectral density (PSD) plots to compare noise signatures before, during and after treatment. For a given station, the noise characteristics were relatively time-invariant, but the noise environment varied considerably from array-to-array and station-to-station. Signals from the majority of high-frequency microseismic events, however, were found to be below the background noise levels of the surface arrays. GeoConvention 2013: Integration 5

Conclusions Continuous passive recordings were successfully acquired over a three-week period using three types of systems: surface geophones, borehole low-frequency geophones and broadband seismometers. The relative paucity of LPLD signals in our data differs from published examples from the Barnett Shale (Das and Zoback, 2011) where this phenomenon appears to be more common. Unlike our present study region, the Barnett shale is noted for complex fracture systems that are generated by hydraulic fracturing (McKeon, 2011). The presence of low-frequency (~ 15 Hz) tremor may be an indicator of resonance in fluid-filled cracks. An apparent tendency for these events to precede high-frequency microseismicity in our data provides a tantalizing suggestion that these processes may be genetically linked. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the support of ARC Resources, Spectraseis, Nanometrics, ESG, and other sponsors of the Microseismic Industry Consortium for their support of this project. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada provided additional funding for this work. References Das, I. and Zoback, M., 2011, Long Period Long Duration Seismic Events During Hydraulic Stimulation of a Shale Gas Reservoir: The Leading Edge, 30, 778-785. Dixon, J., 2000, Regional lithostratigraphic units in the Triassic Montney Formation of western Canada: Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 40, 80-83. McKeon, M., 2011, Horizontal fracturing in shale plays. Petroleum Technology Transfer Conference, Taking A Deeper Look At Shales: Geology And Potential Of The Upper Ordovician Utica Shale In The Appalachian Basin, New Philadelphia, OH, June 21. National Energy Board (NEB), 2009. Primer for Understanding Canadian Shale Gas. Accessed online at http://www.neb.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rnrgynfmtn/nrgyrprt/ntrlgs/prmrndrstndngshlgs2009/ prmrndrstndngshlgs2009-eng.pdf on January 6, 2012. Tary, J-B and van der Baan, M., 2012, Potential use of resonance frequencies in microseismic interpretation: The Leading Edge, 31, 1338-1346. Walsh, W., Adams, C., Kerr, B., and Korol, J., 2006, Regional Shale Gas Potential of the Triassic Doig and Montney Formations, Northeastern British Columbia: British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Petroleum Geology Open file 2006-02. Walter, R. and Brune, J.N., 1993, Spectra of seismic radiation from a tensile crack: Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 4449-4459. GeoConvention 2013: Integration 6