- / CHART NO. 4 I L L I N O I S CONTACT WORK BOATS - M/V GORDON STEVENS AP for O l m sted / Loc k 53 S A I L I N G L I N E

Similar documents
A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W

OH BOY! Story. N a r r a t iv e a n d o bj e c t s th ea t e r Fo r a l l a g e s, fr o m th e a ge of 9

176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s

Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory

Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST D

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

State Water Survey Division SURFACE WATER SECTION

National Maritime Center

P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9

CFD Modeling for Structure Designs in Environmental Impacts Mitigation

2012 USACE Drought Actions

T h e C S E T I P r o j e c t

River Ice Modelling. Hydraulic Modelling of Mackenzie River at Ft. Province, NWT, Canada

A Rich History. AB OVE T H E F O L D: C O N S T R U C T E D by Dwight B. Heard between 1919 and HUMAN SPIDER ON TH E RADIO FI LM DE B UT

M E T R O P O L IT A N A R E A S, U N ITED S T A T E S A N D R E G IO N A L S U M M A R IE S,

= m. 30 m. The angle that the tangent at B makes with the x axis is f = tan-1

A PHYSICAL MODEL STUDY OF SCOURING EFFECTS ON UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM OF THE BRIDGE

Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to inform about or explain the topic. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST D

THIS PAGE DECLASSIFIED IAW E

SOLUTION. ill Principle of Impulse and Momentum: Referring to Fig. b, 75(0) + 75(9.81)(3) - T(3) = 75vA. vb = T (1) From Fig.

PART 4 HURRICANE KATRINA STRIKES NEW ORLEANS AUGUST 2005

Hydraulic Evaluation of Discharge Over Rock Closing Dams on the Upper Mississippi River

Bank Erosion and Morphology of the Kaskaskia River

Software Process Models there are many process model s in th e li t e ra t u re, s om e a r e prescriptions and some are descriptions you need to mode


Analysis of the Effects of Bendway Weir Construction on Channel Cross Sectional Geometry

Stop 1: Marmot Dam Stop 1: Marmot Dam

C o r p o r a t e l i f e i n A n c i e n t I n d i a e x p r e s s e d i t s e l f

SRS. z39 Front Side Airbag Squib Circuit LH Y B Y. Center Airbag Sensor Assembly D2+ 2 A Y G Y R. Spiral Cable. Driver Side Squib 2nd Step Circuit

Inspection of Waterfront Facilities Using Vessel-Based Remote Sensing Mitchell, Del Bello, Suarez

EFFECT OF BAFFLE BLOCKS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF RADIAL HYDRAULIC JUMP

Radioactive Decay and Half Life Simulation 2/17 Integrated Science 2 Redwood High School Name: Period:

MATH 310 TEST Measure April Answers

GEOL 1121 Earth Processes and Environments

Stormwater Outlet Sediment Traps

Fall / Winter Multi - Media Campaign

Cayuga Lake Model. 2-D Hydrodynamic Model. TAC Meeting Wednesday, January 15, 2014 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Upstate Freshwater Institute

Lagunitas Creek Stewardship Plan. Marin Municipal Water District

Syllable Division- Nonsense Words Closed. Directions: Underline the vowels. Then divide and label the syllables. 1. l a b n e t 8.

Provider Satisfaction

Fr anchi s ee appl i cat i on for m

minceymarble.com 4321 Browns Bridge Road, Gainesville, GA Ph: Fx:

Dangote Flour Mills Plc

Downloaded from

NUMERICAL MODEL FOR MOVABLE BED AS A TOOL FOR THE SIMULATION OF THE RIVER EROSION A CASE STUDY

3 2 - x is correct. Since 32 is the total games played, and x is her number of wins, the losses must be 32 take away x.

Calculus I, Fall Solutions to Review Problems II

Riverine Modeling Proof of Concept

Form and content. Iowa Research Online. University of Iowa. Ann A Rahim Khan University of Iowa. Theses and Dissertations

Lesson Ten. What role does energy play in chemical reactions? Grade 8. Science. 90 minutes ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

I zm ir I nstiute of Technology CS Lecture Notes are based on the CS 101 notes at the University of I llinois at Urbana-Cham paign

You can see w h at gold is u sed f or dow n below : )

How Do Human Impacts and Geomorphological Responses Vary with Spatial Scale in the Streams and Rivers of the Illinois Basin?

H STO RY OF TH E SA NT

NUMERICAL MODELLING IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF CONSTRUCTION WORKS WITHIN RIVER BAYS - A CASE STUDY

K E L LY T H O M P S O N

Lake Winnebago Regulation Meeting

Do you think sediment transport is a concern?

MATHEMATICS: PAPER II. 2. Write your examination number in the space provided in your Answer Book.

c. What is the average rate of change of f on the interval [, ]? Answer: d. What is a local minimum value of f? Answer: 5 e. On what interval(s) is f

APPENDIX A M&T/Llano Seco Long-Term Water Reliability Study These photos are examples of rock spurs in use throughout the United States

Advanced /Surface Hydrology Dr. Jagadish Torlapati Fall 2017 MODULE 2 - ROUTING METHODS

Strategies for managing sediment in dams. Iwona Conlan Consultant to IKMP, MRCS

Flooding in Manayunk Neighborhood of Philadelphia

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

NCP3 NCP4 EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES: RIP-RAP FAILED WALL SECTION NORTH WAREHOUSE CEMEX SILOS BULKHEAD WALL

Snork Synthesis Lab Lab Directions

Chemistry 3411 MWF 9:00AM Spring Physical Chemistry I - Exam #2, Version A (Dated: February 27, 2009)

Beechwood Music Department Staff

Rock Sizing for Multi-Pipe & Culvert Outlets

WP2.1 BREACH FORMATION LARGE SCALE EMBANKMENT FAILURE

Executive Committee and Officers ( )

Table of C on t en t s Global Campus 21 in N umbe r s R e g ional Capac it y D e v e lopme nt in E-L e ar ning Structure a n d C o m p o n en ts R ea

INTRODUCTION AND MATHMATICAL Concepts. 1. Which one of the following is an SI base unit? (a) gram (c) newton (e) kilogram

MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc.

Rucker Pond. Background

Instruction Sheet COOL SERIES DUCT COOL LISTED H NK O. PR D C FE - Re ove r fro e c sed rea. I Page 1 Rev A

Which one of the following is an SI base unit? (a) gram (c) newton (e) kilogram

Enclosure 27. Memorandum for Record Gulf Sturgeon Spawning Habitat Survey and Mapping October 2002

Countermeasure Calculations and Design

LAPWARE, LLC. Profit Island Chute is open to navigation and is a shortcut for single-barge

ROAD INVENTORY FOR CERTIFICATION OF MILEAGE

CHANGES IN RIVER BED AROUND THE FUKAWA CONTRACTION AREA BY FLOODS AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT WORKS IN THE LOWER TONE RIVER

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

Modelling the Impacts of Dam Rehabilitation on River Ice Jam: A Case Study on the Matane River, QC, Canada

Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Tata Pond Dam

NOTES ON OPEN CHANNEL FLOW

Tanjung Priok GFPPEP. Presentation and discussion, 22 October 2009 PT. PLN (Persero) Jasa Enjiniring Office Jl. KS Tubun I/2 Petamburan, Jakarta

P a g e 3 6 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9

Relative Velocities In Two Dimensions

Beaver Creek Corridor Design and Analysis. By: Alex Previte

Ashville Park Stormwater Management System Scenarios with Village C

Regional Sediment Management

Me n d e l s P e a s Exer c i se 1 - Par t 1

A STUDY OF LOCAL SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS OF EL-MINIA

MLSE in a single path channel. MLSE in a multipath channel. State model for a multipath channel. State model for a multipath channel

Some Applications of trigonometry

Bird s Point HSR MODEL River Miles HYDRAULIC SEDIMENT RESPONSE MODEL INVESTIGATION

Preparation of a Hydrodynamic model of. Detroit River- St. Clair River waterways. with Telemac-2D

Transcription:

89 7' W 37 10' N 37 10' N 89 6' W FEDERAL MOORING CELLS TOP ELEV. 320.0 WITH BUOYS ON TOP (CELLS WILL GO UNDER WATER WITH A CAIRO GAGE 49.1 ) 37 11' N 89 5' W 37 8' N for O l m sted Loc k 53 OL MS TE D PUBLIC ACCESS - MV GORDON STEVENS 270-748-2596 89 4' W MATCH LINE CHART 3 969 AMERICA POINT H O D G E S B A Y O U CRE E K 968 HUMPHREY'S CREEK Project Depth Shown at Low Water Conditions Olmsted Upper Gage = 2. 0' 967 Olmsted Lower Gage = 10.1 ' Lock 53 Lower Gage = 8.0 ' FIX ED W EI R CE L LS A ND B OAT A B UTME NT FINISHED TOP ELEV. 303.5 ( A BU TME NT AND C EL LS W IL L GO UNDE R WATE R WITH AN OLMSTED UPPER GAGE 24.5 ) O L M S T E D L O C K & D A M C O N S T R U C T I O N S I T E - - MATCH LINE CHART 5 # # - RESTRICTED 89 3' W 37 7' N 89 5' W NOTE: IMPROVED CHANNEL AT MOUND CITY BAR IS DREDGED TO PROVIDE 9 ' PROJECT DEPTH AT AN EXPECTED MINIMUM STA GE OF 7. 5' ON CA IRO GAGE A ND 7. 3' ON LOWER GAGE AT DAM 53. 37 8' N 89 4' W 37 9' N 89 3' W S C A L E : 1 " = 2 0 0 0 ' R E V I S E D : J U LY 2 0 1 8 CHART NO. 4 Feet

595' Existing Fixed Weir 368' exist. Sheet Pile Cutoff Wall 227' Exist. Fixed Weir Cells 227' Navigable Pass Left Boat Abutment Future 1400' Navigation Pass 80' ILLINOIS Top of Bank. EL. 315.00 Top of Left Boat Abutment. EL. 303.50 Navigation Pass Concrete Elev. 278.00 Top Wicket Lifting Eye Elev. 279.80 Tainter Gate Sill, El. 265.00 Elev. 382.00 Top of Lock wall, El. 310.00 Fixed Weir ZERO OF GAGE Upper Gage Zero = 279.0 Lower Gage Zero = 270.9 OLMSTED ELEVATION LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ( LOCK SIZE 1200' x 110' ) ( LOCK SIZE 1200' x 110' ) Top of Concrete Sil, El. 261.00 (Top Gate Stops Elev. 262.50) ILLINOIS 200+ 0+ +0 + 200 + 400 + 600 + 800 + 1000 + 1200 +0 200+ 0+ +0 + 200 + 400 + 600 + 800 + 1000 + 1200 +0 OHIO RIVER KENTUCKY Ladder Check Post

- Full Time Locking Water Below Elev. 306.0 Olmsted Upper Gage Below 27.0' Lock 53 Upper Gage Below 32.9' RESTRICTED ELEV.280 - MV GORDON STEVENS 270-748-2596 NO PASSING B ET W E E N to (ONEWAY TR AFF IC) w o u l d b e R e m o v e d i f C o n d i t i o n s A l l o w f o r O p e n R i v e r P a s s a g e FIXED WEIR CELLS AND BOATABU TMENT FINISHED TOP ELEV.303.5 (ABU TMENTAND CELLS WILLGO U NDER WATER WITH AN OLMSTED U PPER GAGE 24.5) 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CHART NO. 4D - Facing Page

FEDERAL MOORIN G CEL L S (CEL L S WIL L GO U N DER WAT ER WIT H A CAIRO GAGE 49.1) for O l m sted Loc k 53 - MV GORDON STEVENS 270-748-2596 p OL MST ED PU BL IC ACCESS FEDERAL MOORIN G CEL L S (CEL L S WIL L GO U N DER WAT ER WIT H AN OL MST ED U PPER GAGE OF41) HIGH WATER MOORING SIT E NO PASSING B ET W E E N to (ONEWAY TR AFF IC) G 1 G 2 G 3 C O N S T R U C T I O N S I T E 1300'Pa s s - R 1 G 4 R 2 R 3 G 5 EL EV.280 G 6 R 4 W i l l B e R e m o v e d a s N o L o n g e r N e e d e d 963 FIXED WEIR CEL L S AN D BOAT ABU T MEN T FIN ISHED T OP EL EV.303.5 (ABU T MEN T AN D CEL L S WIL L GO U N DER WAT ER WIT H AN OL MST ED U PPER GAGE 24.5) No Construction Due to High Water Water Elevation above 295.0 BU OY SL OCAT ION S: G1=37-10-19.22N 89-04-27.89W G2=37-10-35.31N 89-04-06.27W G3=37-10-40.18N 89-03-58.44W G4=37-10-51.55N 89-03-43.53W G5=37-11-01.87N 89-03-29.88W G6=37-11-13.30N 89-03-19.53W R1=37-10-37.87N 89-03-38.51W R2=37-10-43.67N 89-03-28.80W R3=37-10-51.45N 89-03-20.49W R4=37-11-02.88N 89-03-10.49W Olmsted Upper Gage Above 16.0' Lock 53 Upper Gage Above 21.9' N OT E:IMPROV ED CHAN N EL AT MOU N D CIT Y BAR IS DREDGED T O PROV IDE 9'PROJECT DEPT H AT AN EXPECT ED MIN IMU M ST AGE OF7.5'ON CAIRO GAGE AN D 7.3'ON L OWER GAGE AT DAM 53. CHART NO. SCAL E: 1"= 2000' 4F - REV ISED:JU L Y 2018 Fe e t

FEDERALMOORIN G CELLS TOP ELEV.320.0W ITH BUOYS ON TOP (CELLS W ILLGO UN DER W ATER W ITH ACAIRO GAGE 49.1) for O l m sted Loc k 53 - MV GORDON STEVENS 270-748-2596 p OLMSTED P UBLIC ACCESS FEDERALMOORIN G CELLS TOP ELEV.320.0W ITH BUOYS ON TOP (CELLS W ILLGO UN DER W ATER W ITH AN OLMSTED UP P ER GAGE OF41) RESTRICTED 963 HIGH WATER MOORING SIT E ELEV.280 RESTRICTED Full Time Locking Water Below Elev. 296 FIX ED W EIR CELLS AN D BOATABUTMEN T FIN ISHED TOP ELEV.303.5 (ABUTMEN TAN D CELLS W ILLGO UN DER W ATER W ITH AN OLMSTED UP P ER GAGE 24.5) NO PASSING B ET W E E N to (ONEWAY TR AFF IC) Olmsted Upper Gage Below 27.0' Lock 53 Upper Gage Below 32.9' N OTE:IMP ROV ED CHAN N ELATMOUN D CITY BAR IS DREDGED TO P ROV IDE 9'P ROJECTDEP TH ATAN EX P ECTED MIN IMUM STAGE OF7.5'ON CAIRO GAGE AN D 7.3'ON LOW ER GAGE ATDAM 53. CHART NO. SCALE: 1"= 2000' 4G - REV ISED:JULY 2018 Feet

FEDERAL MOORIN G CEL L S (CEL L S WIL L GO U N DER WAT ER WIT H A CAIRO GAGE 49.1) OL MST ED PU BL IC ACCESS p FEDERAL MOORIN G CEL L S (CEL L S WIL L GO U N DER WAT ER WIT H AN OL MST ED U PPER GAGE OF41) - RESTRICTED - EL EV.280 963 RESTRICTED FIXED WEIR CEL L S AN D BOAT ABU T MEN T -FIN ISHED T OP EL EV.303.5 (ABU T MEN T AN D CEL L S WIL L GO U N DER WAT ER WIT H AN OL MST ED U PPER GAGE 24.5AS SHOWN ON L OCK CROSS-SECT ION ) N OT E:IMPROV ED CHAN N EL AT MOU N D CIT Y BAR IS DREDGED T O PROV IDE 9'PROJECT DEPT H AT AN EXPECT ED MIN IMU M ST AGE OF7.5'ON CAIRO GAGE AN D 7.3'ON L OWER GAGE AT DAM 53. CHART NO. SCAL E: 1"= 2000' 4H - Finished REV ISED:JU L Y 2018 Fe e t