A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

Similar documents
A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples by EPA Method 8260 with The Stratum PTC and SOLATek 72 Multi-Matrix Autosampler

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs

Optimal VOC Method Parameters for the StratUm PTC Purge & Trap Concentrator

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Performance of a Next Generation Vial Autosampler for the Analysis of VOCs in Water Matrices

2017 EPA Method Update Rule and EPA Method 624.1

EPA TO-17 Volatile Organic Compounds

Optimizing Standard Preparation

Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: Job Description: Transform Complete

Ed George and Anaïs Viven Varian, Inc.

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Measuring Environmental Volatile Organic Compounds by U.S. EPA Method 8260B with Headspace Trap GC/MS

Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s) received on 5/15/2017 at Air Toxics Ltd.

U.S. EPA VOLATILE ORGANICS METHOD USING PURGE AND TRAP GC/MS

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: CTRA Project: 6454 T Lab Order: A 6454 Aqueous 3/1/2013.

Method 8260C by Purge and Trap Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry using the Clarus SQ 8

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

AUTONOMOUS, REAL TIME DETECTION OF 58 VOCS IN THE PANAMA CANAL

Application News AD Quantitative Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by EPA Method with Headspace Trap GC-MS

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. Page 1 of 5

Target Compound Results Summary

BIO-CHEM Laboratories, Inc. Work Order Sample Summary. CLIENT: Cascade Thornapple River Assoc. Project: Water Analysis Lab Order:

Rapid Determination of TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Air

Reduced VOC Sample Analysis Times Using a New Dual Purge-and-Trap System

CALA Directory of Laboratories

Meeting NJ Low Level TO-15 Air Testing Method Requirements

Determination of VOCs by USEPA Method 8260 with Extended Dynamic Range using Fast, Sensitive Capillary GC/MS

Application Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract.

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES); BADCT Limits for Volatile Organic Compounds

SUMMARY REPORT OF AIR MONITORING FOR LEED CERTIFICATION PHASE 2 SWANSFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5610 CEDAR LANE COLUMBIA, MD PREPARED FOR:

Volatile Organic Compounds in Water PBM

Solid Phase Microextraction of Cyanogen Chloride and Other Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water with Fast Analysis by GC-TOFMS

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

ANALYTICAL REPORT. Job Number: SDG Number: Job Description: Joint Base Cape Cod

Building 280A and Building 450 Soil Sampling Results Richmond Field Station Site Berkeley Global Campus at Richmond Bay, Richmond, California

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

Copies: Dave Favero, RACER File

METHOD 5021 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN SOILS AND OTHER SOLID MATRICES USING EQUILIBRIUM HEADSPACE ANALYSIS

January 19, Dear Mr. Nightingale:

SOM01.2/Trace Volatiles SOP HW-34 EPA/Region II TABLE OF CONTENTS

Application Note 116 Monitoring VOCs in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes with Analysis by TD-GC/MS in Accordance with Chinese EPA Method HJ


KSA Environmental Laboratory Inc.

R.E.A.C.T. Roxbury Environmental Action CoaliTion P.O. Box 244 Ledgewood, N.J Website:

Optimization of Method Parameters for the Evaluation of USEPA Method Using a Purge and Trap with GC/MS

If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact our office at

Method 1624 Revision C Volatile Organic Compounds by Isotope Dilution GCMS

Techniques for Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Purge-and-Trap/GC/MS Application

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

1. Introduction. 2. Sampling Activities

Enhanced Preconcentrator for the Analysis of Vapor Phase Volatile Organic Compounds

Thermal Desorption Technical Support

Analysis of BTEX in Natural Water with SPME

CIA Advantage-xr. Cryogen-free automated canister and whole-air sampling system

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Purgeable Organic Compounds (VOC s) in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

CALA Directory of Laboratories

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation ALS Environmental - Simi Valley

Associates. Project No.: October 25, 2017

Date Issued: April 01, 2013 Expiration Date: June 30, 2013

C146-E209. Headspace Samplers. HS-20 Series

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

317 Elm Street Milford, NH (603) Fax (603)

STONY HOLLOW LANDFILL, INC S. Gettysburg Ave. Dayton, OH (937) (937) Fax

F 2: Phase 2 Soil Vapor Investigation for Potential Off Site Vapor Intrusion

Table 1 Soil and Groundwater Sampling Summary Table

Volatile Organic Compounds in Every Day Food

Copyright 2009 PerkinElmer LAS and CARO Analytical Services, Inc.

Transcription:

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

Abstract A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8260 is used to determine Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in a variety of matrices. These matrices can vary from water to soil to sludge. In order to determine VOCs in the assorted matrices, the sampling and analysis system should be calibrated as closely to the matrix as possible. This poster will discuss automated water sampling using the soil sampling station of the autosampler thus eliminating the need to have separate calibrations for waters and soils.

Background In order to perform this method, you should check with your auditor to ensure it is approved.

Instrumentation Sampling Technique is Patented (#8,850,905 B2) Requires a syringe option Requires a software upgrade

NELAC Requirements For 8260 Samples The calibration must match the sample matrix. Sample matrix changes in the 12 hour tune window require an added three samples in order to meet NELAC requirements.

Soil Matrices

Matrix Comparison

Compound Response Summary Garden Soil Clay Sand Water 1000000 Compound Response 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 Dichlorodifluoromet Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluorometh 1,1- Dichloroethene Acetone Iodomethane Carbon Disulfide Methylene Chloride MTBE 2- Butanone Chloroform 2- Benzene 1,2- Dichloropropane 4- Methyl- 2- Toluene Compound 2- Hexanone Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene Xylene (m+p) Xylene (o) Bromoform 1,1,2,2-1,2- Dibromo- 3-1,2,4- Naphthalene Hexachlorobutadien 1,2,3-

Internal Standard Response Comparison Garden Soil Clay Sand Water Garden Soil Clay Sand Water 153811 193785 216722 209649 217608 288693 326783 313067 103410 220488 277863 265293 22425 114541 156039 159997 Compound Response 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 Internal Standard

Environmental Lab Sequence Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) tune standard Calibration Standard Laboratory control standard Matrix blank All must pass inspection every 12 hours.

Time Saving Techniques Decrease bake times Purge time and flow rates Dual Sampling systems

Reduce Calibrations One of the most basic ways to save time and money is by reducing the number of required curves and standards needed. EST has designed a patented automated water sampling mode that will allow environmental labs to run water samples in soil mode. Thus, water and soil curves, standards, blanks and samples can use the same sampling parameters.

Step 1 Empty vials are placed in one tray while water standards or samples are placed in the second tray. The system transports the empty vial to the soil sampling station and it is moved onto the sample needle

Step 2 The arm moves over to the full water vial, the vial is pressurized with helium gas and the prescribed water volume is removed. Internal standard (IS) is added by injecting IS into the sample as it is transported to the vial in the soil sampling station. The sampling system is closed the entire time thus ensuring the integrity of the sample.

Step 3 The sample is heated and purged in the same manner as a soil sample, and the analytes are trapped on the analytical trap. Next, the analytes are desorbed onto the GC column.

50ppb Chromatogram of a Water Sample Run in Soil Mode

System Performance Check Compounds (SPCC) Results Compound 8260 RF Requiremen t Curve %RSD Curve Ave. RF MDL Precision (%RSD 50ppb) Accuracy Ave. 50ppb Recovery Chloromethane 0.10 9.74 1.436 0.12 2.12 100.67 1.1-Dichloroethane 0.10 7.70 1.497 0.10 1.94 105.28 Bromoform 0.10 12.14 0.348 0.11 1.90 112.12 Chlorobenzene 0.30 6.12 1.409 0.11 0.99 103.75 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.30 6.76 0.990 0.07 2.55 100.40

Calibration Check Compounds (CCC) Results Compound 8260 Accuracy Requirement Curve %RSD Precision Curve Ave. RF MDL (%RSD 50ppb) Accuracy Ave. 50ppb Recovery 1,1-Dichloroethene ± 20% 4.26 0.68 0.10 2.02 102.43 Chloroform ± 20% 4.79 1.455 0.18 1.57 104.32 1,2-Dichloropropane ± 20% 10.27 0.544 0.11 1.25 105.25 Toluene ± 20% 8.60 1.383 0.09 0.94 110.91 Ethylbenzene ± 20% 8.85 2.499 0.12 1.10 110.51 Vinyl Chloride ± 20% 8.59 1.529 0.09 1.41 112.97

Conclusions The patented sampling process proved to be a reliable and accurate sampling method for running water samples in the soil mode. The curve linearity and method detection limits both met USEPA Method 8260 requirements, and the precision and accuracy results were excellent. The water extraction technique will save laboratories time and money because only one set of standards, curves, etc. is required for both water and soil samples.

Questions? Anne Jurek Sr. Applications Chemist ajurek@estanalytical.com 513-643-0100