Existence is Difference and is expressed and transformed by Information

Similar documents
Nature s coordination Ioannis Hadjidakis University of Ioannina Ioannina, Hellas

Reinterpreting the Solutions of Maxwell s Equations in Vacuum

The cause and development of cosmic background radiation

Particles and Forces

Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Dr. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Advanced Optical Communications Prof. R. K. Shevgaonkar Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Absolute Motions of Objects in a Structured and Elastic Medium Give Rise to a New Theory of Gravity

Notice that this is not just theory. Applying +5 F and -5 F in a point, has exactly the same effect as applying no force in this point at all.

Scientific Examination of Relativistic Velocity and Acceleration Addition. Copyright 2010 Joseph A. Rybczyk

Smooth Bang Theory: The Universe Steadily Gains Mass With Rate c 3 /G

Dark Matter and Energy

Homework 1: Special Relativity. Reading Assignment. Essential Problems. 1 Pole-in-Barn (Hartle 4-3) 2 Black Hole Entropy and Dimensional Analysis

Dick's PhAQs II: Philosopher-Asked Questions

LECTURE 3: SPACETIME AND GEOMETRY: AN INTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL RELATIVITY. AS204 February

37-6 Watching the electrons (matter waves)

ACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER / Functions

The 3D Universe Theory

Proton and electron mass derived as the vacuum energy displaced by a Casimir cavity. By: Ray Fleming

QUANTA. Warren E. York. Started: Last Update: Copyright 2009

String Theory. Quantum Mechanics and Gravity: Cliff Burgess, McGill. The start of a beautiful relationship?

arxiv: v1 [physics.class-ph] 18 Jun 2014

Replay argument. Abstract. Tanasije Gjorgoski Posted on on 03 April 2006

The Graviton in an Equilibrium Universe and the Holographic Principle

The LARGE POP TREMENDOUS EXPLOSION GIANT POW ENORMOUS WALLOP. BIG BANG(theory)!

Flat Geometry. Spherical Geometry

Relativistic Physics of Force Fields in the Space-Time-Mass Domain

ASTR 200 : Lecture 21. Stellar mass Black Holes

Modelling the Big Bang with True Relativity

Instructor (Brad Osgood)

Gennady Shipov. Uvitor, Bangkok, Thailand May 8, 2009

The Pound-Rebka Experiment as Disproof of Einstein s General Relativity Gravity Theory.

Structural Analysis II Prof. P. Banerjee Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture 38

Theory of Everything by Illusion 2.0

Probability: The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle *

On The Discrete Nature of The Gravitational Force. Dewey Lewis Boatmun.

From Quantum Mechanics to String Theory

1 Introduction. 1.1 Stuff we associate with quantum mechanics Schrödinger s Equation

Neutrinos Must be Tachyons

1 Introduction. 1.1 The Standard Model of particle physics The fundamental particles

Light was recognised as a wave phenomenon well before its electromagnetic character became known.

Questioning the Foundations of Physics to Achieve Interstellar Travel. By Benjamin T Solomon

Notes on Huygens Principle 2000 Lawrence Rees

Electrons in Atoms. Section 5.1 Light and Quantized Energy

Absolute motion versus relative motion in Special Relativity is not dealt with properly

ALBERT EINSTEIN AND THE FABRIC OF TIME by Gevin Giorbran

Module 8: The Cosmos in Motion. UNC-TFA H.S. Astronomy Collaboration, Copyright 2011

Revision Guide. Chapter 7 Quantum Behaviour

Underneath the wave function

Cosmology holography the brain and the quantum vacuum. Antonio Alfonso-Faus. Departamento de Aerotécnia. Madrid Technical University (UPM), Spain

Kinematics of special relativity

Jean-Pierre Petit Gille d Agostini

Cosmology and particle physics

Energy and the Quantum Theory

Physics 4213/5213 Lecture 1

Introduction to Bell s theorem: the theory that solidified quantum mechanics

Bell s Theorem. Ben Dribus. June 8, Louisiana State University

DOUBLE-SLIT EXPERIMENT AND BOGOLIUBOV'S CAUSALITY PRINCIPLE D. A. Slavnov

Chapter One BASIC QUESTIONS

Getting Started with Communications Engineering

Advanced Study, 9 Adela Court, Mulgrave, Victoria 3170, Australia

Structure. Subodh Patil NBIA Nov Formation in the Universe From the Big Bang to the Big Rip?

A Science Center To Go scenario for High Schools: the double slit experiment

Today in Astronomy 102: Wormholes

Wallace Hall Academy

Preface to Presentation

Explaining the Mass of Leptons with Wave Structure Matter

Surveying Prof. Bharat Lohani Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module - 11 Lecture No. # 01 Project surveys

The Philosophy of Physics. Is Space Absolute or Relational?

Review Special Relativity. February 3, Absolutes of Relativity. Key Ideas of Special Relativity. Path of Ball in a Moving Train

Communication Engineering Prof. Surendra Prasad Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Communicating with accelerated observers in Minkowski spacetime

A Topological Model of Particle Physics

I. Multiple Choice Questions (Type-I)

General Theory of Light, Matter Particles and Dark Energy in the Universe

Bellwork: Calculate the atomic mass of potassium and magnesium

Wick rotation with the condition of retaining the validity of the Lorentz group. Juan Carlos Alcerro Mena (

Lecture 3 (Part 1) Physics 4213/5213

Bosons in the Zoo of Elementary Particles

Chapter 7. Quantum Theory and the Electronic Structure of Atoms

The reality of de Broglie s pilot wave

Our Current Concept of Locality may be Incomplete

Limitations of Newtonian Physics

Chapter S3 Spacetime and Gravity Pearson Education, Inc.

0. Introduction 1 0. INTRODUCTION

FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES CLASSIFICATION! BOSONS! QUARKS! FERMIONS! Gauge Bosons! Fermions! Strange and Charm! Top and Bottom! Up and Down!

EPR Paradox Solved by Special Theory of Relativity

The Complete Nature of Stellar Aberration. Copyright 2010 Joseph A. Rybczyk

Modern Algebra Prof. Manindra Agrawal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Patrick Supped and J. Acacicb de Barros1

What is the 'cosmological principle'?

Non-Propagation Action At A Distance

Tarja Kallio Tamminen.

Atomic Structure and Processes

Chapter 22 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective. Seventh Edition. The Birth of the Universe Pearson Education, Inc.

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 22, March 20, 2006

Arrangement of Electrons in Atoms

A multivariate analysis of undergraduate physics students conceptions of quantum phenomena

Announcement. Station #2 Stars. The Laws of Physics for Elementary Particles. Lecture 9 Basic Physics

Modern Atomic Theory

Transcription:

Existence is Difference and is expressed and transformed by Information reality is changing by virtuality and at the same time it reveals the latter s existence and role Ioannis Hadjidakis (NARSEP) ihatzida@cc.uoi.gr Introduction Our conceptual reality is our interpretation of the information we can get from our environment. During this long process a great deal of misconception or oversimplification could lead us to a reality that has little to do with its wholeness (the reality that includes the information of everything). It is evident that each of us has his own reality that depends on: His position in spacetime The information he can get as a consequence of his abilities The interpretation each of us does to any information he gets. Each of these matters relates to a wide spectrum of human knowledge and we could only say a few words in order to clarify what we mean. It is common for individuals to arrive to different conclusions starting from the same information. This is mainly due to our different experiences and the way our mind interprets them. Even a single person could react differently under the same circumstances (the same information) depending on his psychological state. In other words, there are a lot of factors that affect the interpretation of information that are not related to the environment or the information, but to the process of interpretation itself. Humans perceive their environment by their senses. The sensitivities of the relevant organs differ for each person and so an individual profile of conceptual senses is formed. This difference of our inputs is another factor that deviates our reality according to our sensual organs ability. Finally, our conceptual reality is mainly related to the information that reaches us and which is dependent on our position in spacetime. The spacetime position of a physical entity is the data required in order to define any influence of the environment on it. The knowledge of the environment however is a prerequisite that can never be fulfilled. In addition to everything else, environment is also dependent on the entity under examination. This is why Universe reacts as an inseparable system and why reductionism (separable systems) is not the proper method for its study. In this essay we try to explain the findings we get by applying simple ideas to the Natural Coordination System (NCS) we have proposed for the examination of Nature (1). The essay refers to a two dimensional space for simplicity reasons alone. Although the complexity of a three dimensional space is beyond the author s ability, the findings are not expected to be much different in three dimensional space.

Information in NCS s nodes-vertices and how it is transferred It is stated that NCS spacetime consists in a manifold of vertices that are connected to their neighbors through precisely defined edges. Figure 1 It is supposed that any information represents difference and this is conceived as existence (IDE). Information is transferred through NCS edges to the vertices. A set of vertices composes an entity and the sum of information included in this set is the set of the entity s properties. Each vertex in real part of NCS hosts four Natural Information Bits (NIBs). Each NIB belongs to one of the four basic properties (mass, charge, spin and time activity). In other words, vertex s properties are characterized by its Natural Information BYte (NIBY) or its four NIBs. So, there are sixteen different vertices according to their elementary properties. The overall sum of the information that a set of vertices - that belong to an entity - possesses is the set of entity's properties. This sum of the of the vertices, that are part of - let us say - an elementary particle (e.g. electron), can be consisted by a huge number of vertices (>>10 30 ).

NIBY mass spin charge time-activity 0000 negative negative negative future 0001 negative negative negative past 0010 negative negative positive future 0011 negative positive positive past 0100 negative positive negative future 0101 negative positive negative past 0110 negative positive positive future 0111 negative positive positive past 1000 positive negative negative future 1001 positive negative negative past 1010 positive negative positive future 1011 positive negative positive past 1100 positive positive negative future 1101 positive positive negative past 1110 positive positive positive future 1111 positive positive positive past It is not far from reality to regard any elementary particle as a small universe that we realize only through its own event horizon. It has an enormous complex and yet unknown organization. Information transfer is the elementary and the universal process that causes the change of reality and its law(s) form(s) the principal physical law(s). Information transfer is related to the world line (WL) of an entity. Given that any entity can choose from an enormous amount of information (vertices) that forms its identity. it may occupy a common part in spacetime manifold with another entity of a different kind. We can suppose - for example - that two electrons and a virtual photon occupy a common part in spacetime during electromagnetic interaction according to the appropriate Feynman diagram.

From the direction of WL of an entity in relation with the reference s coordinate system we can easily calculate the probabilities of a NIBY to be transferred to its two forward vertices (Apendix 2). By using simple formulas we can calculate the probabilities of all possible information s paths that are the probabilities of IDE to actually happen on a certain vertex of spacetime. Needless to mention that apart from the simplicity of Information Transfer Law (ITL) it is impossible to calculate the exact probability in any applicable situation because of the extent of the calculations needed. However, extremely useful conclusions could be extracted from the application of this notion of physical law even to a minor spacetime area. The greatest probabilities for IDE to occur are on the vertices with the geometrically shortest distance from the entity s start. These vertices are found approximately on a straight line, if there is no interference with the environment. It is also very important that the six shortest distances from start are not equivalent as three of them are on the extension of the very first step of IDE spread while the other three are in between. It is found that the latter have the maximum probabilities to occur. These findings forced us to correct our opinion about WL s direction in relation to our previous correspondence (see fig. 1 in ref. 2). The WL of referee, that defines the referee's frame of the system is shown in red in figure 1. The WL of any other existent, differs in spacetime and it never coincides with that of referee's as no two entities can occupy the same set of vertices. Because information transfer does not occur on a straight path, it is evident that, after a certain time, IDE exists into a wide space time area, though with a variety of probabilities. It is this probabilities variation that allows uncertainties to happen and this is the fundamental justification of quantum physics. By applying ITL to a system for up to twenty steps, we can establish the trend of IDE probabilities. It is understood that - as time passes - a probability front (zone) is formed that comprises a number of - limited time spanned paths with the greater probabilities to occur. A number of paths with considerable IDE transfer delay appear outside this zone, but with extremely low probabilities to be followed. (fig. 2)

Figure 2 Each dot represents the set of information paths that end onto a different vertex with a certain distance from start. Ordinate shows the sum probability for this set to be followed. The numbers on the curves indicate the distance (in time steps) information has traveled from start. The middle highest point corresponds to all the paths that end to the vertex on referee's WL with distance equal to 20 time steps. The two lows of red line correspond to the paths that end to the two corners of the synchronous hexagon that are closer to WL. IDE transfer happens in a spherical spread manner. Obviously, probabilities are dropped accordigly. However, when somehow IDE has been concentrated into a limited spacetime area, far away from its start, IDE transfer follows a path on a rather straight line, if there is no interference with environment. Any entity has a point (vertex) in spacetime from which it is supposedly created from. This special vertex's properties (or NIBY) and position in spacetime are fundamental for all entity's life and its behavior. This vertex has the role of Start (or entity's Big Bang). The way that the direction of entity's WL changes defines the entity's behavior in spacetime. The death of an entity occurs by the attribution of any vertex of its set to other set(s) of different entity(ies). According to ITL, reality changes in a certain way because of the movement of NIBYs through spacetime manifold that causes the alteration of the properties of vertices and hence the properties of the entity that these vertices belong to. It should be reminded that an entity is composed of a real set and a virtual set of vertices. Each vertex of real part bears a NIBY (four NIBs) that is complimentary (similar to NXOR gate) to their virtual part in relation to its start. This means, for example, that if the start vertex's NIBY was 0110

and the real vertex has at present the 1100 NIBY in the real part, its virtual vertex - in virtual part - should has the 0101 NIBY. If we consider that an entity is the set of its vertices in real part and their complimentary vertices in virtual part we conclude that the overall probabilities are the product of real and virtual probabilities. The product of real and virtual probabilities is not the square of each because these are not the same. This happens because the two frames (real and virtual) differ in their orientation. If we consider real era, the referee's manifold is oriented according to the maximum probability of real referee's WL. However, this forces virtual manifold to not take the optimum orientation, as direction of virtual referee's WL in virtual manifold is on the extension of the very first step of the expansion. However, this difference in probabilities is getting negligible as time passes and the overall probability could be considered as the square of the real one. Probabilities calculated as the product of real and virtual part, follow the same trend but their overall values drop dramatically (trend as in fig. 3, but ordinate's scale is the square of the scale shown, e.g. 1E-2 becomes 1E-4). The physical or deep metaphysical meaning of this is not discussed here. The opposite spacial distribution of probabilities between the paths without delay and the paths with delays is more than obvious and extremely interesting. Conclusion Going back to the manifold of spacetime and looking at Nature in a different fundamental way we can develop new physics. Right now this view cannot yet be useful in solving practical problems because of the extensive computation needed but it could offer an enormous amount of qualitative insight in respect to the way Nature works. P.S. This essay is based on the ideas first published in ref. 3.

References: 1.Ioannis Hadjidakis, Has the time come?, http://www.fqxi.org/data/essay-contestfiles/hadjidakis_has_the_time_com.pdf 2.Ioannis Hadjidakis, Natural Coordination System (NCS) and Existing Theories in Physics and Cosmology, http://www.fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/hadjidakis_fqxi_3.pdf 3.Ioannis Hadjidakis, Information Within Universe, http://vixra.org/pdf/1304.0165v2.pdf

Appendix 1 The complex system of Information, Difference and Existence (IDE) Let us state the definition of these three widely used words: Information: knowledge that is or can be transferred. Difference: is the quality of being unlike or dissimilar. Existence: empirical reality, the state of being or occurring. Based on these definitions it is easily concluded that existence is realized by its difference from the rest. This difference is then communicated by transfer of information. In other words, information expresses the difference that is existence. No existence can be realized if there is no difference, and difference can be communicated only by information. NIB is not an information BIT, that implies the existence or not of a certain state, but it denotes the existence of a certain state between two opposite ones. In other words it always represents existence and designates the kind of this existence. No existence is not a state but the sum of two or more (2n) existents, half of them in a certain state and the rest in the opposite state. Furthermore, information could create difference by itself. This special difference (created by information), named knowledge existence, is the basis of intellectual individuality. Appendix 2 Formulation of Information Transfer Law (ITL). The main idea for the process of formulating information transfer is to consider probabilities as vectors. According to this way of thinking, we calculate the two components resulted by the splitting of the information to the two directions of the edges that connect the emitting vertex with the two forward vertices of NCS' manifold.(fig. 3) Figure 3 Figure 4 After a time step (quantum of time, Plank time) these two forward vertices receive the information probabilities. By using simple trigonometric relations (sine formula) we get the following formulas

and From these formulas we have, X+Y=2cos(θ) so in order p(x)+p(y)=1 we have to divide by 2cos(θ). Hence, and or and The graph of the above two relations is shown in fig. 4. For exemplary, we give the first steps of a new entity's information transfer. The first three vertices with distance one - in time steps - have information probabilities =1/3 (one information path). At distance two, there are six vertices with information probabilities = 1/6 (one information path). At distance three, there are nine vertices with probability = 1/9 (sum of two information paths). At distance four, there are twelve vertices. Their information probabilities start to vary in relation to their direction (of WL) from the vertex of emission (probabilities' values: 0.111111, 0.066666 and 0.088889). At distance five, there are fifteen (3n) vertices. From the distance six and afterward, information can delay. This means that the distance traveled, in time steps, differs from (is less or equal to) the number of time steps. From distance eight and afterward, the asymmetry of the synchronous hexagon becomes evident (hexagon's corners and edges have not all the same possibilities).