Additional Testing for Padre Dam Eastern Service Area Secondary Connection- Alternative Site Location, San Diego County, California

Similar documents
Archaeological Survey and Evaluation at 8954 El Dorado Parkway, El Cajon, San Diego County, California

April 15, Ms. Andrea Bitterling Helix Environmental Planning, Inc El Cajon Boulevard La Mesa, CA 91942

PW Parkway ES Prince William County, Virginia WSSI #

Advanced Geologic Exploration, Inc.

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE DCP MIDSTREAM THREE RIVERS PLANT TO CGP 51 PROJECT IN LIVE OAK COUNTY, TEXAS

December 13, Kirk Shields Green Mountain Power 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446

David Moore, PacifiCorp Cultural Resources Coordinator Denise DeJoseph, Project Archaeologist

4.11 CULTURAL RESOURCES

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE EASTHAM STATE PRISON FARM UNIT PROJECT IN HOUSTON COUNTY TEXAS

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request

SUMMARY OF SOIL CONDITIONS CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT JIMMY DURANTE BOULEVARD, VIA DE LA VALLE, AND CAMINO DEL MAR DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA

Appendix I-1: Archaeological Records Search

4.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES

COLORADO CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY Management Data Form Rev. 11/10

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.

404 Nationwide Permit: File No. SPL PKK FWS-LA-14B F0556 Streambed Alteration Agreement Notification No.

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services

RE: End of Field Letter for the Proposed Milton Mears Farm Road Solar Project, Milton, Chittenden County, Vermont

FRIENDS OF THE EEL RIVER

Cultural Resources Data

Archaeological Survey and Assessment of Four Wastewater Interceptor Routes in Garner, Wake Co., N.C. (EPA C )

New Mexico Register / Volume XVI, Number 15 / August 15, 2005

Appendix 7A. Cultural Resources Documentation

1.0 PURPOSE AND FORMAT OF THE FINAL EIR

The following maps must be provided as a part of the ADA. The appropriate scale for each map should be determined at the pre application conference.

Project Background. March 9, Commissioners of Public Works 103 Saint Phillip Street Charleston, South Carolina 29203

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions. Section Instructions

CHAPTER 4. Blue Heron Site (47Je1001) 2003 Investigations. By Chrisie L. Hunter

NORTHWEST MENARD COUNTY, TEXAS Prepared for the City of Menard

Shoreline and Climate Change Adaptation Alternatives for The Letter Parcel, Bolinas Lagoon

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS

patersongroup Consulting Engineers April 20, 2010 File: PG1887-LET.01R Novatech Engineering Consultants Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive

THE CROOKS GAP HOUSEPIT SITE AND OTHER NEARBY MID-HOLOCENE HOUSEPITS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Guidance for implementing the Potential Fossil Yield Classification (PFYC) System

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

CA Historical Resources Inventory Listing

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

Appendix D-2. Paleo Letter

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

MEMORANDUM. Jerry Conrow, Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency

Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

RE: AFIN: ADEQ Reference #: WG-LA Well Site: Suarez-Gartner 8-12 No. 1-30H

IMPERIAL COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

December 16, Mr. Lee Hughes Southwest Florida Water Management District Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, FL 33637

Great California Delta Trail Blueprint for Contra Costa and Solano Counties GIS AND MAPPING MEMORANDUM JULY 2010

Lab Topographic Maps. Name: Partner: Purpose. Background Information

Template for Sediment and Erosion Control Plan General Instructions

County of Santa Cruz

Table 9. FAI accession log

Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO

Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of. Boundary, North Kona, Island of Hawai i (TMK:7 2 04:05)

Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) Based Analysis of Historic Resources

Report on Geophysical Survey Na Vrsku, Sahy, Slovakia Coordinates: 48⁰,4,45 N 18⁰,56,23 E. April 2018

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR VERIFICATION OF CORPS JURISDICTION

Exhibit RMP-4. Foote Creek Geology and Topography

Geospatial Data Model for Archaeology Site Data

Rock Scaling Recommendations Logan Creek Drive Cut Slope

Coyote Creek Apache County, Arizona

Report for Area Drainage Studies for 1320 MW (2x660 MW) THERMAL POWER PROJECT AT MIRZAPUR, U.P.

THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY CONFERENCE 2015

ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF THE STANLEY MINE ADVENTURE PARK AREA CLEAR CREEK COUNTY, COLORADO. Prepared for:

EXHIBIT H LOT 317 GRADING AND SITE PLAN

16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN

PHIMF Project - Limited Geotechnical Investigation - Feasibility-Level Report RESPONSE TO INITIAL REVIEW LETTER

APPENDIX D. Paleontological Resources Report

MAPPING BEDROCK: Verifying Depth to Bedrock in Calumet County using Seismic Refraction

4.12 Mineral Resources

FINAL PROJECT PLAN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #66 MORNINGSTAR. Prepared by the

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

3.12 Paleontological Resources

ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )

Archaeological Report Guidelines

Allen Reservoir Failure Analysis Docs

1.0 INSPECTION ANNUAL INSPECTION, JUNE 29, 2011 CARMACKS COPPER PROJECT, CARMACKS, YUKON. Dear Mr. West-Sells,

New Research Exploring the Origins of Sanxingdui

NEEDLES S STREET LEVEE SYSTEM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD SYSTEM ID #

Dolores Public Lands Office Highway 184 Dolores, CO Ph (970) Fax (970)

CASE STUDY #9 - Brushy Fork Dam, Sugar Grove, West Virginia

Starting at Rock Bottom: A Peculiar Central Texas PreClovis Culture

Lagunitas Creek Stewardship Plan. Marin Municipal Water District

J.H. Campbell Generating Facility Pond A - Location Restriction Certification Report

REPORT OF FINDINGS FROM A PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER , 013, 014 PREPARED FOR:

September 21, 2004 GeoInsight Project

DK DM M EMORANDUM D ECEMBER 28, 2018 SUBJECT:

Work Conducted in August 2018

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND. July 18, Alberta Infrastructure & Transportation Central Region #401, Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8

October 26, Ms. Aimee Zack Canadian Pacific 120 S. Sixth Street Suite 900 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis D.2 Cultural Resources Archaeological and Paleontological Resources

Report on Exploratory Drilling. Prospecting Claim Nos and

Should you have any questions regarding this clarification, please contact the undersigned at or (925)

Geophysical Survey. Ballymount Co. Dublin. Licence Ref. 02R029. By John Nicholls Margaret Gowen & Co. Ltd. For LRT

NOA ASSESSMENT HARRIS QUARRY MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

SDI-4553, Major Shellfish Genera and Prehistoric Change on the San Diego County Coast

State Laws and Regulations California Environmental Quality Act The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Chapter 1, 21002) states that:

Producing Chandler Walnut Orchard

Transcription:

Mark Niemiec Padre Dam Municipal Water District P.O. Box 719003 9300 Fanita Parkway Santee, California 92072 Re: Additional Testing for Padre Dam Eastern Service Area Secondary Connection- Alternative Site Location, San Diego County, California Dear, This letter report documents the results of an archaeological investigation conducted by ASM Affiliates, Inc. (ASM), for Padre Dam Municipal Water District's (District) Eastern Service Area Secondary Connection-Alternative Site Location, San Diego County, California (Figure 1). The purpose of this cultural assessment was to determine the absence or presence of subsurface cultural constituents within the proposed project area through shovel test pits (STPs). To date, two phases of work were conducted within the area of potential effects (APE). During the first phase (see memo dated April 25, 2012), a total of nine recorded prehistoric isolates and two prehistoric bedrock milling sites were identified within the APE. Adam Giacinto, ASM Archaeologist, directed a crew of three archaeologists, and Dr. Micah Hale (formally ASM) provided oversight. The project area was subsequently revisited and tested a second time by Associate Archaeologist Angela Pham with Assistant Archaeologist Thomas Taylor on June 22, 2012 under the supervision of Dr. Mark Becker. Description of Activity The District is proposing the construction of a pump station, reservoir, and flow control facility in the unincorporated community of Lakeside (Figure 2). The address for the proposed project area is 13661 Olde Highway 80 (Highway 8 Business Loop). The area is within an unsectioned portion of El Cajon land grant of Township 15 South and Range 1 East on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute El Cajon quadrangle. Los Coches Creek runs through the proposed project area, east-to-west (Figure 3). The environment is primarily comprised of imported, nonnative and native grasses, and ornamental plants and trees, with southern willow scrub vegetation along a portion of Los Coches Creek and several oak trees scattered throughout the parcel. The proposed project is located on a parcel (APN 398-290-27) totaling approximately 4.4 acres.

Page 2 On June 21, 2012, the District requested that ASM conduct further investigation of the proposed project area. The subsequent testing occurred on June 22, 2012 and consisted of eleven STPs located on the southern most end of the proposed project area. Frank Brown, Native American representative for the Viejas Band of the Kumeyaay, was present during the archaeological testing. Results of Shovel Test Pits During this second subsurface phase of cultural investigations, eleven additional STPs (STP-11 to STP-21) were excavated (Figure 4). These STPs were located on the southern part of the proposed project area where the reservoir and pump station may be located. The STPs measured 0.25 m north/south x 0.5 m east/west. STPs were excavated in 20-cm levels. All but one STP was excavated to a depth of 40 cm due to the absence of cultural material. Due to its close proximity to a boulder outcrop, STP-17 continued down to a depth of 60 cm. STP-17 did not yield cultural material. In summary, all eleven of the STPs excavated on the most recent investigation of the project area were negative. The side-wall profiles from all STPs exhibited limited-to-severe mixing of subsurface and surface soils through bioturbation and modern activities. Native American Concerns and Observations The Native American representatives have expressed concern regarding the limited visibility of the ground surface throughout the project area. Conclusions Intensive pedestrian survey and subsurface testing conducted by ASM suggests that there is a sparse distribution of cultural material throughout much of the proposed project parcel. A total of two bedrock milling features, one portable millingstone, five lithic flakes, 32.4 g of imported marine shell, and 8.7 g of avian bone were recorded on the surface and through subsurface testing. All areas within the parcel have been subjected to natural and modern disturbances. Testing indicates that no significant subsurface cultural deposits are present, and that there is a high level of disturbance both on and below the surface. Based on this testing program, the sparse distribution of cultural material and lack of significant subsurface cultural deposits, the archaeological site within the current proposed project parcel has low data potential and does not appear to meet the significance criteria defined within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and San Diego County Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO). If extensive ground disturbance will occur within this project parcel, archaeological monitoring is recommended, along with careful movement of the first two feet of soils through controlled grading to ensure the proper treatment of any unanticipated discoveries of cultural deposits. It

Page 3 is also recommended that a monitoring and unanticipated discoveries treatment plan be prepared prior to any project construction at the current project parcel. A Native American observer should also be present during further project work at this site. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mark S. Becker, Ph.D., RPA Project Manager CC: Angela Pham, M.A., RPA References Laylander, Don and Dave Iversen 2006 SDI-4553, Major Shellfish Genera and Prehistoric Change on the San Diego County Coast. In PCAS Quarterly, 39 (4): 39-48. Attachments: Figure 1. Regional overview of project location Figure 2. Location Map: El Cajon, CA USGS quad: T 15 S, R 1 E Figure 3. Study Area; 13661 Old Highway 80 project parcel Figure 4. Map of all excavation locations. Note that STPs 11-20 were conducted for the second phase of subsurface investigations

Page 4

Page 5 Figure 2. Location Map: El Cajon, CA USGS quad: T 15 S, R 1 E

Page 6 Figure 3. Study Area; 13661 Olde Highway 80 project parcel

Page 7 Figure 4. Map of all excavation locations. Note that STPs 11-21 were conducted for the second phase of subsurface investigations.