on the interval (x + 1) 0! x < ", where x represents feet from the first fence post. How many square feet of fence had to be painted?

Similar documents
MATH 31B: MIDTERM 2 REVIEW. x 2 e x2 2x dx = 1. ue u du 2. x 2 e x2 e x2] + C 2. dx = x ln(x) 2 2. ln x dx = x ln x x + C. 2, or dx = 2u du.

SMT 2014 Calculus Test Solutions February 15, 2014 = 3 5 = 15.

23.2. Representing Periodic Functions by Fourier Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

!!"#"$%&#'()!"#&'(*%)+,&',-)./0)1-*23)

Challenge Problems. DIS 203 and 210. March 6, (e 2) k. k(k + 2). k=1. f(x) = k(k + 2) = 1 x k

Chapter Let. 1) k be a vector-valued function. (a) Evaluate f (0). (b) What is the domain of f () t? (c) Is f () t continuous at t = 1?

EXERCISES FOR SECTION 1.5

AP Calculus BC Chapter 10 Part 1 AP Exam Problems

Math 2142 Exam 1 Review Problems. x 2 + f (0) 3! for the 3rd Taylor polynomial at x = 0. To calculate the various quantities:

5.1 - Logarithms and Their Properties

THE SINE INTEGRAL. x dt t

MATH 128A, SUMMER 2009, FINAL EXAM SOLUTION

15. Vector Valued Functions

Echocardiography Project and Finite Fourier Series

Hamilton- J acobi Equation: Weak S olution We continue the study of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation:

Boyce/DiPrima 9 th ed, Ch 6.1: Definition of. Laplace Transform. In this chapter we use the Laplace transform to convert a

TEACHER NOTES MATH NSPIRED

MATH 4330/5330, Fourier Analysis Section 6, Proof of Fourier s Theorem for Pointwise Convergence

3.6 Derivatives as Rates of Change

72 Calculus and Structures

The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus

2. Nonlinear Conservation Law Equations

1 1 + x 2 dx. tan 1 (2) = ] ] x 3. Solution: Recall that the given integral is improper because. x 3. 1 x 3. dx = lim dx.

e t dt e t dt = lim e t dt T (1 e T ) = 1

EECE 301 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler

Chapter 2. First Order Scalar Equations

Final Spring 2007

PROBLEMS FOR MATH 162 If a problem is starred, all subproblems are due. If only subproblems are starred, only those are due. SLOPES OF TANGENT LINES

23.5. Half-Range Series. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

( ) = 0.43 kj = 430 J. Solutions 9 1. Solutions to Miscellaneous Exercise 9 1. Let W = work done then 0.

AP Calculus BC - Parametric equations and vectors Chapter 9- AP Exam Problems solutions

Module 2 F c i k c s la l w a s o s f dif di fusi s o i n

Week #13 - Integration by Parts & Numerical Integration Section 7.2

! ln 2xdx = (x ln 2x - x) 3 1 = (3 ln 6-3) - (ln 2-1)

Ordinary dierential equations

IB Physics Kinematics Worksheet

4.1 - Logarithms and Their Properties

EECE 301 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler

Math 106: Review for Final Exam, Part II. (x x 0 ) 2 = !

Chapter 4. Truncation Errors

The Asymptotic Behavior of Nonoscillatory Solutions of Some Nonlinear Dynamic Equations on Time Scales

Empirical Process Theory

2.7. Some common engineering functions. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

4.6 One Dimensional Kinematics and Integration

SOLUTIONS TO ECE 3084

Matlab and Python programming: how to get started

Chapter 4 The Fourier Series and Fourier Transform

Chapter 7: Solving Trig Equations

Predator - Prey Model Trajectories and the nonlinear conservation law

AP CALCULUS AB/CALCULUS BC 2016 SCORING GUIDELINES. Question 1. 1 : estimate = = 120 liters/hr

The Laplace Transform

This document was generated at 1:04 PM, 09/10/13 Copyright 2013 Richard T. Woodward. 4. End points and transversality conditions AGEC

Physics 127b: Statistical Mechanics. Fokker-Planck Equation. Time Evolution

We just finished the Erdős-Stone Theorem, and ex(n, F ) (1 1/(χ(F ) 1)) ( n

d 1 = c 1 b 2 - b 1 c 2 d 2 = c 1 b 3 - b 1 c 3

(π 3)k. f(t) = 1 π 3 sin(t)

AP CALCULUS AB 2003 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Solutions to Assignment 1

Integration Over Manifolds with Variable Coordinate Density

Sections 2.2 & 2.3 Limit of a Function and Limit Laws

Guest Lectures for Dr. MacFarlane s EE3350 Part Deux

Solutions from Chapter 9.1 and 9.2

8. Basic RL and RC Circuits

ES.1803 Topic 22 Notes Jeremy Orloff

4 Sequences of measurable functions

AP CALCULUS BC 2016 SCORING GUIDELINES

Basic definitions and relations

MTH 146 Class 11 Notes

Math 1b. Calculus, Series, and Differential Equations. Final Exam Solutions

Section 3.5 Nonhomogeneous Equations; Method of Undetermined Coefficients

2.1: What is physics? Ch02: Motion along a straight line. 2.2: Motion. 2.3: Position, Displacement, Distance

5.2. The Natural Logarithm. Solution

Be able to sketch a function defined parametrically. (by hand and by calculator)

Answers to 1 Homework

Signals and Systems Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) Systems

AP CALCULUS AB 2003 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Circuit Variables. AP 1.1 Use a product of ratios to convert two-thirds the speed of light from meters per second to miles per second: 1 ft 12 in

SINUSOIDAL WAVEFORMS

Ground Rules. PC1221 Fundamentals of Physics I. Kinematics. Position. Lectures 3 and 4 Motion in One Dimension. A/Prof Tay Seng Chuan

Chapter 3 Kinematics in Two Dimensions

UCLA: Math 3B Problem set 3 (solutions) Fall, 2018

Kinematics Vocabulary. Kinematics and One Dimensional Motion. Position. Coordinate System in One Dimension. Kinema means movement 8.

EECE 301 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler

The Contradiction within Equations of Motion with Constant Acceleration

Morning Time: 1 hour 30 minutes Additional materials (enclosed):

a. Show that these lines intersect by finding the point of intersection. b. Find an equation for the plane containing these lines.

y h h y

dt = C exp (3 ln t 4 ). t 4 W = C exp ( ln(4 t) 3) = C(4 t) 3.

Math 10B: Mock Mid II. April 13, 2016

SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 2 - MATH 355. with c > 3. m(n c ) < δ. f(t) t. g(x)dx =

Advanced Integration Techniques: Integration by Parts We may differentiate the product of two functions by using the product rule:

x i v x t a dx dt t x

Math 115 Final Exam December 14, 2017

Ordinary Differential Equations

KEY. Math 334 Midterm III Winter 2008 section 002 Instructor: Scott Glasgow

f t te e = possesses a Laplace transform. Exercises for Module-III (Transform Calculus)

Robotics I. April 11, The kinematics of a 3R spatial robot is specified by the Denavit-Hartenberg parameters in Tab. 1.

6.003 Homework #8 Solutions

10. State Space Methods

Transcription:

Calculus II MAT 46 Improper Inegrals A mahemaician asked a fence painer o complee he unique ask of paining one side of a fence whose face could be described by he funcion y f (x on he inerval (x + x <, where x represens fee from he firs fence pos. How many square fee of fence had o be pained? Here s a graph showing he face of he fence: 4 4 6 7 8 9 - The graph shows ha he fence is alles when x and diminishes in heigh as x grows larger. I seems, however, ha because he fence has infinie lengh, we would be unable o deermine he area of he fence. Suppose for a minue, however, ha he area can be represened by one specific value. How could we find i? You migh have guessed ha he definie inegral (x + describes he area we seek. Because he definie inegral includes as a limi of inegraion, we call i an improper inegral. Any definie inegral wih one or boh limis involving infiniy is an improper inegral. Because we canno direcly evaluae an inegral ha includes ± as a limi of inegraion, we rely on he use of a limi o help complee he evaluaion. Here s how. A second ype of improper inegral, described laer in hese noes, is one for which he limis of inegraion include a verical asympoe of he funcion. The inegral x is an example of his second ype of improper inegral because x is a verical asympoe of he funcion.

Example (x + lim # (x + lim $ ( ' * # &' x + * lim $ # + $ + $.( ' - * &, / lim $ ( # & ' + * $ Because he limi exiss, we say ha he improper inegral (x + converges. For our example, here are square fee of area o be pained on he fence. Here s anoher example. Example : Evaluae x. This is an improper inegral because one of he limis of inegraion is. Following he process described in Example, we have x lim # x lim ln x # lim ln $ ln # $ ln Because a finie limi does no exis, we say ha he improper inegral x diverges. Replace wih a variable here we use and hen ake he limi of he resuling inegral. Find he desired aniderivaive and evaluae from o. Evaluae he limi. Every improper inegral of he ype explored in hese wo examples will eiher converge or diverge. If he associaed limi exiss (i.e., is a finie value, he improper inegral converges. If

he associaed limi does no exis (i.e., approaches ± or oherwise canno be evaluaed, he improper inegral diverges. Anoher Form of Improper Inegral Our mahemaician friend also asked he fence painer o pain one side of anoher fence. This fence also had a face ha could be described by a funcion, namely, y on he inerval, x < x where x represens fee from he firs fence pos. How many square fee of fence had o be pained on one side of his fence? Here s a graph showing he face of his fence: 8 7 6 4 4 6 7 8 9 The graph shows ha he fence is alles when x and diminishes in heigh as x grows larger. Alhough his fence does no have infinie lengh, i does appear o have infinie heigh a x, so again we seem unable o deermine he area of he fence. If, however, we could compue he area, how could we find i? Righ, evaluae he definie inegral x. This inegral is also an improper inegral, because he funcion y / x has a verical asympoe a one of he limis of inegraion. Again we call on limis o help us deermine wheher he improper inegral converges or diverges and, if i converges, o deermine he value of he definie inegral.

Example x lim + x lim ln x + lim ln # ln + ln # #$ ( $ Because he limi does no exis, he improper inegral diverges. Example 4: Describe why x is an improper inegral and deermine wheher i converges or diverges. If i converges, deermine is value. This is an improper inegral of he second ype because he funcion y has a verical asympoe a one of he x limis of inegraion. We use limis o evaluae he inegral. x lim # + $ & x ' ( lim [ x ] # + lim # + Example : Randi evaluaed and deermined ha x ln x x ln ln ln ln. Deermine wha Randi did incorrecly and hen correcly evaluae he definie inegral.

I is correc ha ln x + C, bu Randi evaluaed x his incorrecly. Because he limis of inegraion include a value of x ha is a disconinuiy of he funcion, a x, we need o be more careful in is evaluaion. The definie inegral is an improper inegral because a disconinuiy in he x funcion occurs wihin he limis of inegraion. To correcly evaluae he improper inegral, we need o express he original inegral as he sum of wo inegrals so ha he value of x a which a disconinuiy occurs is eiher an upper or lower limi of inegraion: + x x x We evaluae he resuling wo inegrals, using limis as shown in previous examples, and deermine wheher he improper inegrals converge or diverge. If one or boh of he new improper inegrals diverges, hen he original inegral is said o diverge. If boh of he new improper inegrals converge, he original inegral converges and we express is value as a finie number. $ ' lim & x # x ( lim ln x # lim ln ln # ln ln * ln * Because one of he new improper inegrals diverges, he original improper inegral diverges. There is no need o evaluae he second of he wo new improper inegrals.