Connecting Caputo-Fabrizio Fractional Derivatives Without Singular Kernel and Proportional Derivatives

Similar documents
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Mean Value Theorem. MATH 161 Calculus I. J. Robert Buchanan. Summer Department of Mathematics

Mean Value Theorem. MATH 161 Calculus I. J. Robert Buchanan. Summer Department of Mathematics

3.5: Issues in Curve Sketching

MA 137 Calculus 1 with Life Science Applications Monotonicity and Concavity (Section 5.2) Extrema, Inflection Points, and Graphing (Section 5.

MATH 1190 Exam 4 (Version 2) Solutions December 1, 2006 S. F. Ellermeyer Name

Answer Key 1973 BC 1969 BC 24. A 14. A 24. C 25. A 26. C 27. C 28. D 29. C 30. D 31. C 13. C 12. D 12. E 3. A 32. B 27. E 34. C 14. D 25. B 26.

Section 4.3 Concavity and Curve Sketching 1.5 Lectures. Dr. Abdulla Eid. College of Science. MATHS 101: Calculus I

4.1 Analysis of functions I: Increase, decrease and concavity

Maximum and Minimum Values (4.2)

Calculus AB Topics Limits Continuity, Asymptotes

1969 AP Calculus BC: Section I

Topic Outline AP CALCULUS AB:

Applied Mathematics Letters

Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences University of Alberta

ECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS. Lecture 2 Laplace Transform I 1/52

Math 1323 Lesson 12 Analyzing functions. This lesson will cover analyzing polynomial functions using GeoGebra.

CALCULUS EXPLORATION OF THE SECOND FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS. Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (Chain Rule Version): f t dt

Solutions of Math 53 Midterm Exam I

2007 AP Calculus AB Free-Response Questions Section II, Part A (45 minutes) # of questions: 3 A graphing calculator may be used for this part

AB Calc Sect Notes Monday, November 28, 2011

sec x dx = ln sec x + tan x csc x dx = ln csc x cot x

7.1. Calculus of inverse functions. Text Section 7.1 Exercise:

MATH 23 Exam 2 Review Solutions

Concepts of graphs of functions:

MTH4100 Calculus I. Week 8 (Thomas Calculus Sections 4.1 to 4.4) Rainer Klages. School of Mathematical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London

Lesson 59 Rolle s Theorem and the Mean Value Theorem

MATH 151, Fall 2015, Week 12, Section

Math 261 Final Exam - Practice Problem Solutions. 1. A function f is graphed below.

ANOTHER FIVE QUESTIONS:

Suppose that f is continuous on [a, b] and differentiable on (a, b). Then

AP CALCULUS BC 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

MATH 215/255 Solutions to Additional Practice Problems April dy dt

Understanding Part 2 of The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

AP Calculus BC Fall Final Part IIa

Math 1314 ONLINE Lesson 12

1. Find A and B so that f x Axe Bx. has a local minimum of 6 when. x 2.

Motion in Space. MATH 311, Calculus III. J. Robert Buchanan. Fall Department of Mathematics. J. Robert Buchanan Motion in Space

NO CALCULATOR 1. Find the interval or intervals on which the function whose graph is shown is increasing:

1985 AP Calculus AB: Section I

1998 Calculus AB Scoring Guidelines

2.1 The Tangent and Velocity Problems

Note: Unless otherwise specified, the domain of a function f is assumed to be the set of all real numbers x for which f (x) is a real number.

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

MATH CALCULUS I 2.2: Differentiability, Graphs, and Higher Derivatives

BE SURE THAT YOU HAVE LOOKED AT, THOUGHT ABOUT AND TRIED THE SUGGESTED PROBLEMS ON THIS REVIEW GUIDE PRIOR TO LOOKING AT THESE COMMENTS!!!

Calculus and Parametric Equations

DIFFERENTIATION RULES

Test # 1 Review Math MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Math Exam 03 Review

SEE and DISCUSS the pictures on pages in your text. Key picture:

Math Essentials of Calculus by James Stewart Prepared by Jason Gaddis

a x a y = a x+y a x a = y ax y (a x ) r = a rx and log a (xy) = log a (x) + log a (y) log a ( x y ) = log a(x) log a (y) log a (x r ) = r log a (x).

CALCULUS II MATH Dr. Hyunju Ban

x f(x)

Math 1314 Lesson 13: Analyzing Other Types of Functions

lim 2 x lim lim sin 3 (9) l)

x x 1 x 2 + x 2 1 > 0. HW5. Text defines:

Learning Objectives for Math 165

Review Sheet 2 Solutions

Math 117: Honours Calculus I Fall, 2002 List of Theorems. a n k b k. k. Theorem 2.1 (Convergent Bounded) A convergent sequence is bounded.

AP Calculus BC Fall Final Part IA. Calculator NOT Allowed. Name:

MATH 2053 Calculus I Review for the Final Exam

x f(x)

AP CALCULUS AB 2004 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Review Sheet for Exam 1 SOLUTIONS

1. Determine the limit (if it exists). + lim A) B) C) D) E) Determine the limit (if it exists).

High Order Numerical Methods for the Riesz Derivatives and the Space Riesz Fractional Differential Equation

Daily WeBWorK. 1. Below is the graph of the derivative f (x) of a function defined on the interval (0, 8).

(i) find the points where f(x) is discontinuous, and classify each point of discontinuity.

Integration. 5.1 Antiderivatives and Indefinite Integration. Suppose that f(x) = 5x 4. Can we find a function F (x) whose derivative is f(x)?

Final Examination 201-NYA-05 May 18, 2018

Math 1500 Fall 2010 Final Exam Review Solutions

UBC-SFU-UVic-UNBC Calculus Exam Solutions 7 June 2007

Math 308, Sections 301, 302, Summer 2008 Lecture 5. 06/6/2008

Curriculum Map: Mathematics

HIGHER ORDER MULTI-TERM TIME-FRACTIONAL PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS INVOLVING CAPUTO-FABRIZIO DERIVATIVE

1.2 A List of Commonly Occurring Functions

AP Calculus 2004 AB FRQ Solutions

112. x x 114. y x

Parametric Functions and Vector Functions (BC Only)

NAME: DATE: CLASS: AP CALCULUS AB SUMMER MATH 2018

AP Calculus AB. Chapter IV Lesson B. Curve Sketching

Work the following on notebook paper. You may use your calculator to find

Concavity and Lines. By Ng Tze Beng

y=5 y=1+x 2 AP Calculus Chapter 5 Testbank Part I. Multiple-Choice Questions

Worksheet 1.8: Geometry of Vector Derivatives

Math Ordinary Differential Equations

Test Your Strength AB Calculus: Section A 35 questions No calculator allowed. A. 0 B. 1 C. 2 D. nonexistent. . Which of the following

Math 233. Directional Derivatives and Gradients Basics

Helpful Website:

Applications of Differentiation

Definitions & Theorems

Section 3.1 Extreme Values

HEAT-3 APPLICATION OF DERIVATIVES BY ABHIJIT KUMAR JHA MAX-MARKS-(112(3)+20(5)=436)

Review Sheet 2 Solutions

Review sheet Final Exam Math 140 Calculus I Fall 2015 UMass Boston

Maximum principle for the fractional diusion equations and its applications

Calculus 1: Sample Questions, Final Exam

Topics and Concepts. 1. Limits

Transcription:

Connecting Caputo-Fabrizio Fractional Derivatives Without Singular Kernel and Proportional Derivatives Concordia College, Moorhead, Minnesota USA 7 July 2018

Intro

Caputo and Fabrizio (2015, 2017) introduced a new fractional time derivative without singular kernel given by Dt α f (t) = 1 t f (τ)e α 1 α (t τ) dτ. 1 α a If α = 0, we recover D 0 t f (t) = t a f (τ)dτ = f (t) f (a). If α = 1, then D 1 t f (t) = f (t). Their related fractional time integral is ait α f (t) = 1 t α a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ.

Caputo and Fabrizio (2015, 2017) introduced a new fractional time derivative without singular kernel given by Dt α f (t) = 1 t f (τ)e α 1 α (t τ) dτ. 1 α a If α = 0, we recover D 0 t f (t) = t a f (τ)dτ = f (t) f (a). If α = 1, then D 1 t f (t) = f (t). Their related fractional time integral is ait α f (t) = 1 t α a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ.

Caputo and Fabrizio (2015, 2017) introduced a new fractional time derivative without singular kernel given by Dt α f (t) = 1 t f (τ)e α 1 α (t τ) dτ. 1 α a If α = 0, we recover D 0 t f (t) = t a f (τ)dτ = f (t) f (a). If α = 1, then D 1 t f (t) = f (t). Their related fractional time integral is ait α f (t) = 1 t α a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ.

Caputo and Fabrizio (2015, 2017) introduced a new fractional time derivative without singular kernel given by Dt α f (t) = 1 t f (τ)e α 1 α (t τ) dτ. 1 α a If α = 0, we recover D 0 t f (t) = t a f (τ)dτ = f (t) f (a). If α = 1, then D 1 t f (t) = f (t). Their related fractional time integral is ait α f (t) = 1 t α a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ.

For α [0, 1], we will define a proportional derivative via D α f = αf + (1 α)f. This talk will lead to a proportional integral of f by ai α t f (t) := 1 α t Note that we then have the relationships a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ. (1.1) D α t f (t) = a I 1 α t f (t) and a I α t f (t) = a I α t f (t).

For α [0, 1], we will define a proportional derivative via D α f = αf + (1 α)f. This talk will lead to a proportional integral of f by ai α t f (t) := 1 α t Note that we then have the relationships a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ. (1.1) D α t f (t) = a I 1 α t f (t) and a I α t f (t) = a I α t f (t).

For α [0, 1], we will define a proportional derivative via D α f = αf + (1 α)f. This talk will lead to a proportional integral of f by ai α t f (t) := 1 α t Note that we then have the relationships a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ. (1.1) D α t f (t) = a I 1 α t f (t) and a I α t f (t) = a I α t f (t).

For α [0, 1], we will define a proportional derivative via D α f = αf + (1 α)f. This talk will lead to a proportional integral of f by ai α t f (t) := 1 α t Note that we then have the relationships a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ. (1.1) D α t f (t) = a I 1 α t f (t) and a I α t f (t) = a I α t f (t).

(Naive) Motivation In control theory (see Ding, et al), a proportional-derivative (PD) controller takes the form where u = controller output t = time κ d = derivative gain κ p = proportional gain u(t) = κ d d dt E(t) + κ pe(t), E = error between state and process variables

PD-Controller: Postpone Onset of Hopf Bifurcation d u(t) = κ d dt E(t) + κ pe(t) For an example of a recent use of PD-controllers, let x denote a network congestion window and y be the queuing delay. A model proposed by Darvishi and Mohammadinejad (2016) is ( ) b x(t)y(t τ) ẋ(t) = a + κ d E x (t) + κ p E x (t) ẏ(t) = 1 c d + y(t τ) ( x(t) d + y(t τ) c (d + y(t τ)) ) 2 + κ d E y (t) + κ p E y (t), where E x (t) = x(t) x and E y (t) = y(t) ȳ.

PD-Controller: Postpone Onset of Hopf Bifurcation d u(t) = κ d dt E(t) + κ pe(t) For an example of a recent use of PD-controllers, let x denote a network congestion window and y be the queuing delay. A model proposed by Darvishi and Mohammadinejad (2016) is ( ) b x(t)y(t τ) ẋ(t) = a + κ d E x (t) + κ p E x (t) ẏ(t) = 1 c d + y(t τ) ( x(t) d + y(t τ) c (d + y(t τ)) ) 2 + κ d E y (t) + κ p E y (t), where E x (t) = x(t) x and E y (t) = y(t) ȳ.

Proportional α-derivative Definition u(t) = κ d d dt E(t) + κ pe(t) For α [0, 1], the differential operator D α is defined via D α f (t) = αf (t) + (1 α)f (t) provided the function f is differentiable at t, where f := d dt f. This will be called the proportional α-derivative.

Example using the α-derivative Example For α [0, 1], consider the α-derivative of the function f (t) = t 2 at α = n 8, n Z, 0 n 8. Then D α f (t) = αf (t) + (1 α)f (t) becomes which looks like... D n/8 f (t) = nt 4 + 8 n 8 t2,

Example of the α-derivative (cont.) 8 6 t 2 4 2-2 -1 1 2 3-2 2t -4 Figure: In this graph, we can see that as α increases from 0 to 1, the curve t 2 bends toward 2t.

Basic α-derivatives Lemma Let D α f (t) = αf (t) + (1 α)f (t), where α [0, 1]. Then 1 D α [af + bg] = ad α [f ] + bd α [g] for all a, b R; 2 D α [c] = c(1 α) for all constants c R; 3 D α [fg] = fd α [g] + gd α [f ] (1 α)fg; 4 D α [f /g] = gdα [f ] fd α [g] g 2 + (1 α) f g.

Lines and MVT

The α-constant: e 0 (t, s) Definition (The α-exponential Function) For α (0, 1] and s t, define the α-exponential function as Then In particular, for p 0, t p(τ) (1 α) e p (t, s) := e s α dτ. D α e p (t, s) = p(t)e p (t, s). 1 α e 0 (t, s) = e ( α )(t s), and D α e 0 (t, s) = 0.

The α-constant: e 0 (t, s) Definition (The α-exponential Function) For α (0, 1] and s t, define the α-exponential function as Then In particular, for p 0, t p(τ) (1 α) e p (t, s) := e s α dτ. D α e p (t, s) = p(t)e p (t, s). 1 α e 0 (t, s) = e ( α )(t s), and D α e 0 (t, s) = 0.

Properties of the α-exponential The exponential function e p (t, s) has the following properties: (i) e p (t, t) 1. (ii) e p (t, s)e p (s, r) = e p (t, r). (iii) 1 e p(t,s) = e p(s, t).

Visualizing the α-constants: ce 0 (t, s) 2 1-1 1 2 3 4-1 -2 Figure: For α = 0.5, various constant functions.

α-lines Definition Using α-exponentials and our derivative, we define a horizontal α-line to be a function f with slope D α f = 0, and thus of the form 1 α f (t) = ce 0 (t, s) = ce ( α )(t s). A general α-line is a function of the form f (t) = c 1 e 0 (t, s) + c 2 e 0 (t, s)t. These are known as geodesics, curves with zero acceleration.

α-lines Definition Using α-exponentials and our derivative, we define a horizontal α-line to be a function f with slope D α f = 0, and thus of the form 1 α f (t) = ce 0 (t, s) = ce ( α )(t s). A general α-line is a function of the form f (t) = c 1 e 0 (t, s) + c 2 e 0 (t, s)t. These are known as geodesics, curves with zero acceleration.

Parallel Lines Below, given the line y 1 and a point p not on y 1, there exists exactly one line y 2 intersecting p and parallel to y 1. 1.0 y 1 0.5 y 2-1 1 2 3 4 5 p -0.5

α-secant and α-tangent Lines Theorem Let α (0, 1] and h 1 (t, a) := t a α. Two important geodesics are the α-secant line for a function f from a to b given by σ(t) := e 0 (t, a)f (a) + h 1 (t, a) e 0(t, b)f (b) e 0 (t, a)f (a), h 1 (b, a) and the α-tangent line for a function f differentiable at a given by l(t) := e 0 (t, a)f (a) + h 1 (t, a)e 0 (t, a)d α f (a).

Visualizing α-derivatives Tangent Lines 30 20 10 0-5 0 5 Figure: For α = 2/3, f (t) = t 2 on its slope field.

Tangent Function: Extrema for the α-derivative 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-1.5-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Figure: For α = 0.275, f (t) = tan t on its slope field.

Tangent Function: Critical Points Explained tan (t) α= tan (t) - sec (t) 2 1 3 α 1 4 1 6 1 12 - π 2-3 π 8 - π 4 - π 8 t Figure: For α [0, 1], the zeros of D α [tan t] illustrated for α as a function of t.

Rolle s Theorem Note that if the α-secant line for a function f is an α-line with slope = 0 from (a, f (a)) to (b, f (b)), then f (a) = e 0 (a, b)f (b). Theorem Let α (0, 1]. If the function f is continuous on [a, b] and differentiable on (a, b), with f (a) = e 0 (a, b)f (b), then there exists at least one number c (a, b) such that D α f (c) = 0.

Rolle s Theorem Example -5-4 -3-2 -1 c b -1-2 -3 σ(t) a f(t)=t l(t) α = 1 2-4 -5

Mean Value Theorem Theorem Let α (0, 1]. If the function f is continuous on [a, b] and differentiable on (a, b), then there exists at least one number c (a, b) such that where h 1 (b, a) = b a α. D α f (c) = e 0(c, b)f (b) e 0 (c, a)f (a), h 1 (b, a)

Picture of MVT Example for α = 0.5 1.15 1.10 1.05 1.00 0.95 a σ(t) f(t)=1 c b 0.90 0.85 l(t) 0.80 α = 1 2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

FTC

Definite α-integral Definition Let α [0, 1]. Then the definite α-integral from a to b of an integrable function f is ai α t f (τ) := 1 α t a f (τ)e 1 α α (t τ) dτ.

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Theorem (Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) Let α [0, 1]. (FTC I) If f is integrable, then D α [ a I α t f (τ)] = f (t). (FTC II) If f : [a, b] R is differentiable on [a, b] and f is integrable on [a, b], then ai α b Dα [f (t)] = f (b) f (a)e 0 (b, a).

Proof of FTC II: Let P be any partition of [a, b], P = {t 0, t 1,, t n }, and recall that h 1 (t, a) = t a α. By MVT applied to f on [t i 1, t i ], there exist c i (t i 1, t i ) such that or equivalently D α f (c i ) = e 0(c i, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (c i, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ), h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i )h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ). After forming the Riemann-Stieltjes sum n S(P, f, µ) = D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i ) (µ(t i ) µ(t i 1 )) i=1 i=1 with µ(t) := t a α = h 1(t, a), we see that n S(P, f, µ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ) = f (b) e 0 (b, a)f (a).

Proof of FTC II: Let P be any partition of [a, b], P = {t 0, t 1,, t n }, and recall that h 1 (t, a) = t a α. By MVT applied to f on [t i 1, t i ], there exist c i (t i 1, t i ) such that or equivalently D α f (c i ) = e 0(c i, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (c i, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ), h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i )h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ). After forming the Riemann-Stieltjes sum n S(P, f, µ) = D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i ) (µ(t i ) µ(t i 1 )) i=1 i=1 with µ(t) := t a α = h 1(t, a), we see that n S(P, f, µ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ) = f (b) e 0 (b, a)f (a).

Proof of FTC II: Let P be any partition of [a, b], P = {t 0, t 1,, t n }, and recall that h 1 (t, a) = t a α. By MVT applied to f on [t i 1, t i ], there exist c i (t i 1, t i ) such that or equivalently D α f (c i ) = e 0(c i, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (c i, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ), h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i )h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ). After forming the Riemann-Stieltjes sum n S(P, f, µ) = D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i ) (µ(t i ) µ(t i 1 )) i=1 i=1 with µ(t) := t a α = h 1(t, a), we see that n S(P, f, µ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ) = f (b) e 0 (b, a)f (a).

Proof of FTC II: Let P be any partition of [a, b], P = {t 0, t 1,, t n }, and recall that h 1 (t, a) = t a α. By MVT applied to f on [t i 1, t i ], there exist c i (t i 1, t i ) such that or equivalently D α f (c i ) = e 0(c i, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (c i, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ), h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i )h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ). After forming the Riemann-Stieltjes sum n S(P, f, µ) = D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i ) (µ(t i ) µ(t i 1 )) i=1 i=1 with µ(t) := t a α = h 1(t, a), we see that n S(P, f, µ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ) = f (b) e 0 (b, a)f (a).

Proof of FTC II: Let P be any partition of [a, b], P = {t 0, t 1,, t n }, and recall that h 1 (t, a) = t a α. By MVT applied to f on [t i 1, t i ], there exist c i (t i 1, t i ) such that or equivalently D α f (c i ) = e 0(c i, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (c i, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ), h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i )h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ). After forming the Riemann-Stieltjes sum n S(P, f, µ) = D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i ) (µ(t i ) µ(t i 1 )) i=1 i=1 with µ(t) := t a α = h 1(t, a), we see that n S(P, f, µ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ) = f (b) e 0 (b, a)f (a).

Proof of FTC II: Let P be any partition of [a, b], P = {t 0, t 1,, t n }, and recall that h 1 (t, a) = t a α. By MVT applied to f on [t i 1, t i ], there exist c i (t i 1, t i ) such that or equivalently D α f (c i ) = e 0(c i, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (c i, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ), h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i )h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ). After forming the Riemann-Stieltjes sum n S(P, f, µ) = D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i ) (µ(t i ) µ(t i 1 )) i=1 i=1 with µ(t) := t a α = h 1(t, a), we see that n S(P, f, µ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ) = f (b) e 0 (b, a)f (a).

Proof of FTC II: Let P be any partition of [a, b], P = {t 0, t 1,, t n }, and recall that h 1 (t, a) = t a α. By MVT applied to f on [t i 1, t i ], there exist c i (t i 1, t i ) such that or equivalently D α f (c i ) = e 0(c i, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (c i, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ), h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i )h 1 (t i, t i 1 ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ). After forming the Riemann-Stieltjes sum n S(P, f, µ) = D α [f (c i )]e 0 (b, c i ) (µ(t i ) µ(t i 1 )) i=1 i=1 with µ(t) := t a α = h 1(t, a), we see that n S(P, f, µ) = e 0 (b, t i )f (t i ) e 0 (b, t i 1 )f (t i 1 ) = f (b) e 0 (b, a)f (a).

Since the partition P was arbitrary, f (b) e 0 (b, a)f (a) = = b a b a b D α [f (t)]e 0 (b, t)dµ(t) D α [f (t)]e 0 (b, t)µ (t)dt = 1 D α [f (t)]e 0 (b, t)dt α a = a Ib α Dα [f (t)]. This completes the proof of FTC II.

α Extrema

α-increasing and α-decreasing Definition Let α (0, 1]. A function f is strictly α-increasing on an interval I if f (t 1 ) < e 0 (t 1, t 2 )f (t 2 ), whenever t 1 < t 2, t 1, t 2 I, and is strictly α-decreasing if e 0 (t 2, t 1 )f (t 1 ) > f (t 2 ), whenever t 1 < t 2, t 1, t 2 I. Theorem (α-increasing/α-decreasing Test) Letting α (0, 1], suppose that D α f exists on some interval I. 1 If D α f (t) > 0 for all t I, then f is strictly α-increasing on I. 2 If D α f (t) < 0 for all t I, then f is strictly α-decreasing on I.

α-increasing/α-decreasing Example 4 2 0-2 -4 f(t)=t -4-2 0 2 4 α = 1 2

Critical Point and α-max/α-min Definition (Critical Point) Let α [0, 1]. A function f has a critical point at t 0 if D α f (t 0 ) = 0 or D α f (t 0 ) does not exist. Definition (Max/Min) Let α (0, 1]. A function f has 1 a local α-max at t 0 if f (t 0 ) e 0 (t 0, t)f (t); 2 a local α-min at t 0 if f (t 0 ) e 0 (t 0, t)f (t) for all t near t 0.

First α-derivative Test Theorem Letting α (0, 1], suppose that t 0 is a critical point of f. 1 If D α f changes from + to at t 0, then f has a local α-max at t 0. 2 If D α f changes from to + at t 0, then f has a local α-min at t 0. 3 If D α f does not change sign at t 0, then f has neither an α-max nor α-min at t 0.

Concavity Test Theorem Letting α (0, 1], suppose D α D α f exists on some interval I. 1 If D α D α f (t) > 0 t I, then the graph of f is concave upward on I. 2 If D α D α f (t) < 0 t I, then the graph of f is concave downward on I. Here concave upward means the curve y = f (t) lies above all of its α-tangents l(t) on I, and concave downward means the curve y = f (t) lies below all of its α-tangents l(t) on I.

Second α-derivative Test Theorem Letting α (0, 1], suppose D α D α f is continuous near t 0. 1 If D α f (t 0 ) = 0 and D α D α f (t 0 ) > 0, then f has a local α-min at t 0. 2 If D α f (t 0 ) = 0 and D α D α f (t 0 ) < 0, then f has a local α-max at t 0.

Figure of α-max/α-min for f (t) = t 2 5 4 α-max 3 2 1 0 α-min -1 α = 1 2-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3

α-minimum and α-maximum Values of sin kt Theorem Let α (0, 1], and assume k is any real, positive number and n is an integer. The function sin kt has an α-max at ( 1 ( ) ) kα k arctan + nπ 1 α k, kα, n odd, (k 2 + 1)α 2 2α + 1 and an α-min at ( 1 ( ) ) kα k arctan + nπ 1 α k, kα, n even. (k 2 + 1)α 2 2α + 1

New Development Recently (February, 2018), V. E. Tarasov published a paper, No nonlocality, No fractional derivative specifically mentioning the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative and saying that it is not a fractional derivative.

Acknowledgements This research was begun with Darin Ulness of the Concordia College-Moorhead chemistry department. It continued with Concordia students Grace Bryan and Laura LeGare in the summer of 2016, and was supported by an NSF STEP grant (DUE 0969568).

Citations Bryan and LeGare, The calculus of proportional α-derivatives, Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Math. J., Vol. 18: Iss. 1, Article 2 (2017). Caputo and Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1, No. 2, 73 85 (2015)., 3D Memory Constitutive Equations for Plastic Media, J. Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 143, Issue 5 (May 2017). Ding, Zhang, Cao, Wang, and Liang, Bifurcation control of complex networks model via PD controller, Neurocomputing Vol. 175, pp. 1 9 (2016). V. E. Tarasov, No nonlocality. No fractional derivative, Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 62 (2018) 157 163.

Thanks!