Solar eruptive filament studies at USO for the COMESEP project

Similar documents
Understanding the Nature of Collision of CMEs in the Heliosphere. Wageesh Mishra Postdoctoral Researcher with Yuming Wang

Connecting remote and in situ observations of 22 coronal mass ejections from the Sun to 1 AU

EFFECT OF SOLAR AND INTERPLANETARY DISTURBANCES ON SPACE WEATHER

Space Weather Effects of Coronal Mass Ejection

Coronal Mass Ejections in the Heliosphere

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 6 Jun 2013

Radio Observations and Space Weather Research

Effect of CME Events of Geomagnetic Field at Indian Station Alibag and Pondicherry

Space Physics: Recent Advances and Near-term Challenge. Chi Wang. National Space Science Center, CAS

Long term data for Heliospheric science Nat Gopalswamy NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA

INTERPLANETARY ASPECTS OF SPACE WEATHER

THE DRAG-BASED MODEL

FORBUSH DECREASES ASSOCIATED TO STEALTH CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS

In-Situ Signatures of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections

An L5 Mission Concept for Compelling New Space Weather Science

Solar-terrestrial relation and space weather. Mateja Dumbović Hvar Observatory, University of Zagreb Croatia

Solar eruptive phenomena

Recent and future actions about Space Weather in Austria Manuela Temmer

Work Group 2: Theory

Sun Earth Connection Missions

STCE Newsletter. 7 Dec Dec 2015

PROPAGATION AND EVOLUTION OF ICMES IN THE SOLAR WIND

Differences between CME associated and CH associated RED events during 2005

Toward Interplanetary Space Weather: Strategies for Manned Missions to Mars

Ooty Radio Telescope Space Weather

The largest geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 23 occurred on 2003 November 20 with a

Coronal Mass Ejections and Extreme Events of Solar Cycle 23. Nat Gopalswamy NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, USA

Statistical Influences of Sun Spot Numbers and Solar Radio Fluxes on Geomagnetic Field during the Period

Geomagnetic Disturbances (GMDs) History and Prediction

STCE Newsletter. 4 Jan Jan 2016

Halo CMEs in October November 2003: predictions and reality

NASA s Contribution to International Living With a Star

Substorms at Mercury: Old Questions and New Insights. Daniel N. Baker Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP)

SOTERIA. Giovanni Lapenta for the Soteria Consortium. Centrum voor Plasma-Astrofysica Katholieke Universiteit Leuven BELGIUM

A STATISTICAL STUDY ON CORONAL MASS EJECTION AND MAGNETIC CLOUD AND THEIR GEOEFFECTIVENESS

Chapter 8 Geospace 1

Geomagnetic Disturbance Report Reeve Observatory

Space Weather Activities in Switzerland

Recent and future actions about Space Weather in Austria Manuela Temmer

Space Weather and Satellite System Interaction

The importance of solar wind magnetic. the upcoming Sunjammer solar sail. field observations & mission

Geoeffectiveness of Coronal Mass Ejections in the SOHO era

STCE Newsletter. 11 Jan Jan 2016

arxiv: v1 [physics.space-ph] 29 Sep 2017

PC index as a standard of magnetospheric disturbances in the auroral zone

РС INDEX AS INDICATOR OF THE SOLAR WIND ENERGY ENTERED INTO THE MAGNETOSPHERE: RELATION TO INTERPLANETARY ELECTRIC FIELD AND MAGNETIC DISTURBANCES

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 13 Oct 2014

NASA s STEREO Mission

Space Weather. S. Abe and A. Ikeda [1] ICSWSE [2] KNCT

How is Earth s Radiation Belt Variability Controlled by Solar Wind Changes

Space Research at Hvar Observatory

IDENTIFICATION OF SOLAR SOURCES OF MAJOR GEOMAGNETIC STORMS BETWEEN 1996 AND 2000 J. Zhang, 1 K. P. Dere, 2 R. A. Howard, 2 and V.

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

Gaps in Space Weather Forecasting

Indo-US Bilateral Cooperation Program in Heliophysics and Space Weather

CISM Model Timeline, Years 6-10

Solar Cycle Variation of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Latitudes

Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms during

Signatures of Geomagnetic Storms and Coronal Mass Ejections on Electron and Ion Temperatures At Low Latitude Upper Ionosphere

Inverse and normal coronal mass ejections: evolution up to 1 AU. E. Chané, B. Van der Holst, C. Jacobs, S. Poedts, and D.

An Automatic Segmentation Algorithm for Solar Filaments in H-Alpha Images using a Context-based Sliding Window

The Solar wind - magnetosphere - ionosphere interaction

UNDERSTANDING THE EVOLUTION AND PROPAGATION OF CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS AND ASSOCIATED PLASMA SHEATHS IN INTERPLANETARY SPACE

Post CME events: cool jets and current sheet evolution

Response of the Earth s magnetosphere and ionosphere to the small-scale magnetic flux rope in solar wind by the MHD simulation

Magnetic Reconnection in ICME Sheath

An Introduction to Space Weather. J. Burkepile High Altitude Observatory / NCAR

A NEW MODEL FOR REALISTIC 3-D SIMULATIONS OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENTS

Sun-Earth Connection Missions

Forecas(ng the Magne(c Field Configura(on of CMEs

Test Particle Simulations of Solar Energetic Particles using Parker Spiral and ENLIL Fields

HELCATS WP7 Update - overview. Mario Bisi on behalf of Jonathan Eastwood HELCATS month 12 meeting, May 2015, Göttingen, Germany

Coronal Mass Ejections and Geomagnetic Storms

The Dynamic Magnetosphere. Ioannis A. Daglis. National Observatory of Athens, Greece

STCE Newsletter. 18 Jan Jan 2016

NMDB - the European neutron monitor database

Solar Activity during the Rising Phase of Solar Cycle 24

parameters and to AL and Dst indices in course of Magnetic Storms

7-8 March 2012: a busy period in the geospace

Effect of solar features and interplanetary parameters on geomagnetosphere during solar cycle-23

Solar and Interplanetary Disturbances causing Moderate Geomagnetic Storms

THE SOLAR WIND & SOLAR VARIABILITY

National Report Greece

10:10-10 :35 P.K.Manoharan National Centre for Radio Astrophysics

STCE Newsletter. 6 Jan Jan 2014

Study of Flare Related Intense Geomagnetic Storms with Solar Radio Burst and JIMF

Two types of geomagnetic storms and relationship between Dst and AE indexes

Low energy electron radiation environment for extreme events

Earth Affecting Solar Causes Observatory (EASCO): A New View from Sun Earth L5

Geoeffectiveness (Dst and Kp) of interplanetary coronal mass ejections during and implications for storm forecasting

High-energy solar particle events in cycle 24

Relationship between Interplanetary (IP) Parameters and Geomagnetic Indices during IP Shock Events of 2005

Progress of MHD Simulations for the Interplanetary Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections

The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: The St. Patrick day (17 March 2015) event

Solar energetic particles and space weather

Predicting the occurrence of super-storms

Numerical simulations of ICME-ICME interactions

Relationship of interplanetary coronal mass ejections with geomagnetic activity

Solar Energetic Particle Events within the STEREO era:

Activities of the Japanese Space Weather Forecast Center at Communications Research Laboratory

Transcription:

International Symposium on Solar Terrestrial Physics ASI Conference Series, 2013, Vol. 10, pp 67 71 Edited by N. Gopalswamy, S. S. Hasan, P. B. Rao and Prasad Subramanian Solar eruptive filament studies at USO for the COMESEP project N. Srivastava 1, N. Crosby 2, A. Veronig 3, E. Robrrecht 4, B. Vršnak 5, S. Vennerstrom 6, O. Malandraki 7, S. Dalla 8, L. Rodriguez 4, M. Hesse 9, D. Odstrcil 10 1 Udaipur Solar Observatory, Physical Research Laboratory, Udaipur, India 2 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Belgium 3 University of Graz, Austria 4 Royal Observatory of Belgium, Belgium 5 Hvar Observatory, Croatia 6 Technical University of Denmark, Denmark 7 National Observatory of Athens, Greece 8 University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom 9 Community Coordinated Modeling Center at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S.A. 10 George Mason University, Fairfax- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S.A. Abstract. The Coronal Mass Ejections and Solar Energetic Particles (COMESEP) project is developing tools for forecasting geomagnetic storms and solar energetic particle (SEP) radiation storms. By analysis of historical solar and interplanetary data, complemented with the extensive data coverage of solar cycle 23, the key ingredients that lead to geomagnetic storms, SEP events and the factors that are responsible for false alarms are being identified. Based on the insights gained, and making use of algorithms for the automated detection of CMEs, forecasting tools for geomagnetic and SEP radiation storms will be developed and optimised. Validation and implementation of the developed tools into an operational Space Weather Alert system will be performed. COMESEP is a unique cross collaboration effort and bridges the gap between the SEP, CME and terrestrial effects scientific communities. The role of the Udaipur Solar Observatory (USO) in addressing some of the goals of this project are highlighted in this paper. In particular, USO is engaged in studying the CMEs associated with eruptive filaments. We describe the studies undertaken to understand space weather effects related to these CMEs. Keywords : CME filaments ICMEs geomagnetic activity email: nandita@prl.res.in

68 N. Srivastava et al. 1. Introduction Eruptive filaments are known to be associated with Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs). Some of these CMEs can be the drivers of major geomagnetic storms at the Earth. Most of the earlier studies have focused on the geomagnetic effects of CMEs associated with major flares with little attention on those associated with eruptive filaments. Udaipur Solar Observatory is involved in addressing some of the important questions related to identification of filaments in Interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) and their role in geomagnetic activity as part of the COronal Mass Ejections and Solar Energetic Particles (COMESEP) project (http://comesep.aeronomy.be/). COMESEP is a 3 year collaborative project funded by the European Commission FP7 project 263252 which commenced on 1 February 2011. The primary objective of COMESEP is to improve our understanding on forecasting geomagnetic storms and solar energetic particle (SEP) radiation storms. This is done in a two fold way. By analyzing the historical data, complemented with the extensive data coverage of solar cycle 23, the key parameters leading to magnetic storms and SEP events are being identified. To improve the forecasting of the arrival time, 3D kinematics and interplanetary (IP) propagation of CMEs are also being examined. In parallel, the sources and propagation of SEPs are being examined and modeled. Apart from the above goals, algorithms for the automated detection of CMEs, forecasting tools for geomagnetic and SEP radiation storms are being developed. It is also envisaged to validate these models leading into an operational Space Weather Alert system. In order to achieve the overall science objectives, cross collaboration between various SEP, CME and terrestrial effects scientific communities is highly desirable. The participation of USO as an external collaborator finds significant importance, as some of the research problems that are being pursued at USO, viz., CME propagation and consequences, filament eruptions, are in line with the ones outlined in the COMESEP project. Besides the common scientific objectives, active collaborations and participation in analysis of historical data and development of forecasting tools will be instrumental towards establishing a forecasting center for space weather in India. 2. Accomplished studies at USO The building components; of the COMESEP project have been, divided into 3 main subjects: (i) basic science; (ii) model optimisation; and (iii) alert tools. Basic science is sub-divided into three work-packages covering CMEs, SEPs and Space Weather Impact. The main objectives of the CME work-package are to (i) Study the 3D kinematics and IP propagation of ICMEs (ii) Test and compare analytical and numerical ICME propagation models (iii) Study the evolution of the ICME magnetic structure. In the SEP work-package the main objectives are: (i) enhance our understanding of the source of SEP events and acceleration processes, as well as SEP propagation; (ii) advance SEP modelling to include CME propagation effects, cross field diffusion and heavy ions. Key parameters of solar events that define the space weather impact are identified and the impact for prediction purpose quantified in the space weather im-

Solar eruptive filament studies 69 pact work-package. USO has actively participated towards realisation of CME and space weather impact work-packages; in particular, two important studies completed in the first year of the project are: 1. Identification of filament plasma in ICMEs: Although most of the CMEs are known to be associated with eruptive prominences, the associated ICMEs do not always contain prominence material that can be identified easily. After the launch of SOHO and ACE, compositional signatures have been used to identify filament plasma in ICMEs (Burlaga et al. 1998; Gopalswamy et al. 1998; Lepri & Zurbuchen 2010; Lee & Raymond 2012). In a study undertaken at USO, we detected filament plasma in two ICMEs using magnetic, plasma and compositional signatures. One of these events was associated with an active region eruptive filament and an M3.9/2N flare on November 18. 2003. while the other with a quiescent filament eruption on 01 August 2010. The investigation of plasma properties for filaments in ICMEs showed low temperature, high proton and electron densities coinciding with pressure balanced regions in magnetic clouds. Further, compositional signatures such as depressed ion charge states, high ion and helium densities and presence of He+ ions were also detected in this region. The two ICMEs showed a mixture of cold and hot plasma with presence of He+ ions. The rarity of finding cold, low charge state ions at 1AU as an indicator of filament plasma, suggests partial ionization of elements during transit through corona. It also shows that filament plasma is regularly observed in ICMEs but no longer distinguishable as ionizationally cold (Skoug et al. 1999: Sharma and Srivastava, 2012). 2. IP and geomagnetic consequences of January 05, 2005 CMEs associated with solar eruptive filaments: We carried out a cradle-to-grave study of two solar filament eruption events of 05 January 2005 based on multi-instrument, multi-technique remote-sensing observations and in-situ measurements of ICMEs. These eruptions occurred at 04:21 UT and 13:06 UT and resulted in two distinct magnetic clouds. These magnetic clouds embedded with filament plasma merged together in IP medium and formed complex magnetic structure at their interface region. These features impacted the Earth s magnetosphere - ionosphere system and resulted in a moderate geomagnetic storm (Dst 96 nt). During the main phase of this storm on 07 January, polarity reversals in the Y-component (dawn-to-dusk) of IP electric field seem to trigger two major auroral substorms with concomitant changes in the polar ionospheric electric field. However, similar polarity reversal on 08 January during the recovery phase of the storm did not trigger any substorm activity highlighting complex relationship between storms and substorms. The study provides the most comprehensive view of the CMEs of 05 January 2005 (Sharma et al. 2013). 3. Ongoing studies in the project 1. Estimating the arrival time of CMEs using STEREO/SECCHI observations: Prediction of the arrival time and transit speed of CMEs near the Earth is one of the key problems in understanding the solar terrestrial relationship. We have used the

70 N. Srivastava et al. 3D triangulation on the J-maps constructed from images obtained from Heliospheric Imagers HI1 and HI2 for 8 CMEs observed during 2008-2010. Based on the reconstruction, and applying the Drag Based Model (Vršnak et al. 2010) for the distance where the CMEs cannot be tracked unambiguously in the IP medium, the arrival time of these CMEs have been estimated. These have also been compared with the actual arrival time. The analysis reveals the importance of heliospheric imaging in forecasting the arrival time and direction of propagation of CMEs in the IP medium (Mishra and Srivastava 2013). In another study, we evaluate the performance of different techniques used with HI observations to obtain kinematics of a CME in the heliosphere. We also plan to quantify the errors and understand the limitations involved in each technique in order to improve the prediction of the arrival time of CMEs (Mishra & Srivastava, 2013b, in preparation). 2. Onset time estimation of eruptive filaments and associated CMEs: One of the major constraints in investigating the driving force of these CMEs is the difficulty of estimating their correct onset time. Particularly, in the case of eruptive filaments, monitoring their activation is crucial for forewarning of its disappearance in H α and/or in EUV for defining the onset time of the associated CME lift off. We are studying a filament that underwent recurrent partial eruptions before its complete eruption on August 8, 2012. We implement an automated detection algorithm for estimating different attributes of this filament in order to study its evolution during these eruptions. Our results show the importance of such studies in understanding the mechanism of CME initiation and possible role of eruptive filaments for the same (Srivastava, Joshi and Mathew 2013). 4. Summary Several studies have been undertaken under the COMESEP project at USO, in particular, for the problems outlined in the CME work-package as well as those concerning space weather impact. The scientific results thus obtained will be useful for optimising detection and forecasting tools to be developed for space weather alerts and forecasting systems. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge all members of the COMESEP Project Consortium. COME- SEP project has received funding from the European Commission FP7 Project (263252). Burlaga L., et al., 1998, JGR, 103, 277 Gopalswamy N., et al., 1998, GRL, 25, 2485 Lee J. Y., Raymond J. C., 2012, ApJ, 758, 116 References

Solar eruptive filament studies 71 Lepri S. T., Zurbuchen T. H., 2010, ApJ. Lett., 723, 22 Mishra W., Srivastava N., 2013, ApJ, 772,70, 20 Mishra W., Srivastava N., Davies J. A., 2014, ApJ, 784, 135, 16 Sharma R., Srivastava N., 2012, JSWSC, 2, A10 Sharma R., Srivastava N., Chakrabarty D., Möestl C., Hu Q., 2013, JGR, 118, 1-14, JGR, doi:10.1002/jgra.50362 Skoug R. M., Bame S. J., Feldman W. C. et al., 1999, GRL, 26 (2), 161 Srivastava N, Joshi A. D., Mathew S. K., 2013, IAUS300 Proc., Vol. 8, 495 Vršnak B., Žic T., Falkenberg T. V., Möstl C., et al., 2010, A&A, 512, A43