Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting Process and Heat Absorption/Generation

Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. ISSN 0973-768 Volume 3, Number 9 (207), pp. 4889-4907 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting Process and Heat Absorption/Generation Dr. Mamta Goyal Associate Proffessor Department Of Mathematical Sciences University of Rajasthan, jaipur, Rajasthan, India Email: mamta245@gmail.com Mr. Vikas Tailor 2 Department Of Mathematical Sciences University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India Email: viikas00@gmail.com Dr. Rajendra Yadav 3 Department Of Mathematical Sciences University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India Email: rajendrauor@gmail.com Abstract An analysis is presented to describe the effect of melting and heat absorption/generation in fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics occurring during the melting process of micropolar fluid. The flow past over a stretching sheet through a porous medium presence of viscous dissipation. The governing equations representing fluid flow have been transformed into nonlinear ordinary differential equations using similarity transformation. The governing equations obtained have been solved numerically by using Runge- Kutta method of fourth order with shooting technique. The effects of the micropolar or material parameter, magnetic parameter, melting parameter and

4890 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav heat absorption/generation parameter, porous medium and Eckert number on the fluid flow velocity profile, angular velocity profile and temperature profile have been tabulated, represented by graph and discussed in detail. Result show that heat transfer rate decrease with melting parameter and heat absorption parameter while increase in heat generation parameter significantly at the fluid-solid interface. Keywords: Melting process, Stagnation point, Heat absorption/generation, Stretching Surface, micropolar fluid, MHD, heat transfer. NOMENCLATURE a,c Constant (m ) B 0 B C f Magnetic field Magnetic parameter Skin-friction coefficient C p Specific heat at constant pressure (J kg K ) C s Ec h Heat capacity of solid surface Eckert Number Dimensionless angular velocity j Micro inertia density (m 2 ) K Micropolar or material parameter K p Permeability of porous medium K p Porous medium Parameter k Thermal conductivity of the fluid (W m K ) n Constant Nu Nusselt number Pr Prandtl number T Temperature (K) T s Temperature of the solid medium u, v Dimensionless velocities along x and y direction respectively x,y Axial and perpendicular co-ordinate (m) Q o Coefficient of heat absorption

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 489 Re x ε f Reynolds number Stretching parameter Dimensionless stream function Greek symbols Ψ Stream function α Thermal diffusivity γ Spin-gradient viscosity (N s) μ Dynamic viscosity (Pa s) σ Electrical conductivity of the fluid θ Dimensionless temperature ρ Density ν Kinematic viscosity Λ Vortex viscosity ω Component of microrotation ( rad s ) λ Latent heat of the fluid τ w η Surface heat flux Non dimensionless distance Subscripts M Condition at the melting surface free stream condition. s Solid medium Superscripts Derivative with respect to η INTRODUCTION Micropolar fluid deals with a class of fluids that exhibit certain microscopic effects arising from the local structure and micro-motions of the fluid elements. Micro-polar

4892 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav fluids contain dilute suspensions of rigid macromolecules with individual motion that support stress and body moments and are influenced by spin inertia. Eringen [] developed a simple theory (theory of micropolar fluids) which includes the effect of local rotary inertia, the couple stress and the inertial spin. This theory is expected to be useful in analyzing the behavior of non-newtonian fluids. Eringen [2] and [3] extended the theory of thermo-micropolar fluids and derived the constitutive law for fluids with microstructure. This general theory of micropolar fluids deviates from that of Newtonian fluid by adding two new variables to the velocity. This theory may be applied to explain the phenomenon of the flow of colloidal fluids, liquid crystals, polymeric suspensions, animal blood etc. There has been a renewed interest in MHD flow with heat and mass transfer due to the important effect of magnetic field on the performance of many systems using electrically conducting fluid. Das [4] has discussed the effect of partial slip on steady boundary layer stagnation point flow of electrically conducting micropolar fluid impinging normally through a shrinking sheet in the presence of a uniform transverse magnetic field. MHD free convection and mass transfer flow in a micropolar fluid over a stationary vertical plate with constant suction had been studied by El-Amin [5]. Gamal and Rahman [6] studied the effect of MHD on thin film of a micropolar fluid and they investigated that the rotation of microelement at the boundary increase the velocity when compared with the case when the there is no rotation at the boundary. Flows of fluids through porous media are of principal interest because these are quite prevalent in nature. Such flows have attracted the attention of a number of scholars due to their applications in many branches of science and technology, viz. in the fields of agriculture engineering to study the underground water resources, seepage of water in river beds, in petroleum technology to study the movement of natural gas, oil, and water through the oil reservoirs, in chemical engineering for filtration and purification processes. Also, the porous media heat transfer problems have several practical engineering applications such as crude oil extraction, ground water pollution and biomechanical problems e.g. blood flow in the pulmonary alveolar sheet and in filtration transpiration cooling. Hiremath and Patil [7] studied the effect on free convection currents on the oscillatory flow of polar fluid through a porous medium, which is bounded by vertical plane surface of constant temperature. The problem of flow and heat transfer for a micropolar fluid past a porous plate embedded in a porous medium has been of great use in engineering studies such as oil exploration, thermal insulation, etc. Raptis and Takhar [8] have considered the micropolar fluid through a porous medium. Fluctuating heat and mass transfer on three-dimensional flow through a porous medium with variable permeability has been discussed by Sharma et al. [9]. Stagnation flow, describing the fluid motion near the stagnation region, the stagnation region encounters the highest pressure, the highest heat transfer and the highest rates of mass deposition, exists on all solid bodies moving in a fluid. Unsteady MHD boundary layer flow of a micropolar fluid near the stagnation point of a two

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 4893 dimensional plane surface through a porous medium has been studies by Nadeem et al. [0]. The heat transfer over a stretching surface with variable heat flux in micropolar fluid is studied by Ishak et al []. Wang [2] observed the shrinking flow where velocity of boundary layer moves toward a fix point and they found an exact solution of Navier Stokes equations. Lukaszewicz [3] have a good list of reference for micropolar fluid is available in it. The effect of melting on forced convection heat transfer between a melting body and surrounding fluid was studied by Tien and Yen [4]. Gorla et al. [5] investigated unsteady natural convection from a heated vertical plate in micropolar fluid. The melting heat transfer of steady laminar flows over a flat plate was analyzed by Epstein and Cho [6]. The steady laminar boundary layer flow and heat transfer from a warm, laminar liquid flow to a melting surface moving parallel to a constant free stream have been studied by Ishak et. Al [7]. Rasoli et al. [8] investigated micropolar fluid flow towards a permeable stretching/ shrinking sheet in a porous medium numerically. Y. J. Kim [9-2] unsteady convection flow of micropolar fluids past a vertical plate embedded in a porous medium and Heat and mass transfer in MHD micropolar flow over a vertical moving plate in a porous medium and also observed analytical studies on MHD oscillatory flow of a micropolar fluid over a vertical porous plate. Yacob et al. [22] analyzed a model to study the heat transfer characteristics occurring during the melting process due stretching / shrinking parameter, melting parameter and the stretching\shrinking parameter on the velocity, temperature, skin friction coefficient and the local Nusselt number. The melting effect on transient mixed convective heat transfer from a vertical plate in a liquid saturated porous medium studied by Cheg and Lin [23]. Das [24] studied the MHD flow and heat transfer from a warm, electrically conducting fluid to melting surface moving parallel to a constant free stream in the presence of thermal boundary layer thickness decrease for increasing thermal radiation micropolar fluid. Sharma et al. [25] investigated effects of chemical reaction on magneto-micropolar fluid flow from a radiative surface with variable permeability.the effects of thermal radiation using the nonlinear Rosseland approximation are investigated by Cortell [26]. Mahmoud and Waheed [27] presented the effect of slip velocity on the flow and heat transfer for an electrically conducting micropolar fluid through a permeable stretching surface with variable heat flux in the presence of heat generation (absorption) and a transverse magnetic field. They found that local Nusselt number decreased as the heat generation parameter is increased with an increase in the absolute value of the heat absorption parameter. Bataller [28] proposed the effects of viscous dissipation, work due to deformation, internal heat generation (absorption) and thermal radiation. It was shown internal heat generation/absorption enhances or damps the heat transformation. Ravikumar et al. [29] studied unsteady, twodimensional, laminar, boundary-layer flow of a viscous, incompressible, electrically conducting and heat-absorbing, Rivlin Ericksen flow fluid along a semi-infinite vertical permeable moving plate in the presence of a uniform transverse magnetic

4894 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav field and thermal buoyancy effect. They observed that heat absorption coefficient increase results a decrease in velocity and temperature. Khan and Makinde [30] studied the bioconvection flow of MHD nanofluids over a convectively heat stretching sheet in the presence of gyrotactic microorganisms. Khan et al. [3] observed heat and mass transfer in the third-grade nanofluids flow over a convectively-heated stretching permeable surface. The dual solution of stagnationpoint flow of a magnetohydrodynamic Prandtl fluid through a shrinking sheet was made by Akbar et al. [32]. Akbar et al. [33] analyzed numerical solution of Eyring Powell fluid flow towards a stretching sheet in the presence of magnetic field. Ahmed and Mohamed [34] studied steady, laminar, hydro-magnetic, simultaneous heat and mass transfer by laminar flow of a Newtonian, viscous, electrically conducting and heat generating/absorbing fluid over a continuously stretching surface in the presence of the combined effect of Hall currents and mass diffusion of chemical species with first and higher order reactions. They found that for heat source, the velocity and temperature increase while the concentration decreases, however, the opposite behavior is obtained for heat sink. To the best our knowledge this problem together with magnetic parameter, porous medium and heat absorption\ generation has not be consider before, so that the result are new. In the present work, we consider the boundary layer stagnation-point flow and heat transfer in the presence of melting process and heat absorption in a MHD micropolar fluid towards a porous stretching sheet. We reduced the non-linear partial differential equations to a system of ordinary differential equations, by introducing the similarity transformations. The equations thus obtained have been solved numerically using Runge Kutta method with shooting technique. The effects of the magnetic parameter, porous medium parameter, melting parameter, micropolar parameter and heat absorption/generation parameter on the fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics have been tabulated, illustrated graphically and discussed in detail. MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION The graphical model of the problem has been given along with flow configuration and coordinate system (see Fig. ). The system deals with two dimensional stagnation point steady flow of micropolar fluid towards a stretching porous medium surface with heat absorption/generation with presence of viscous dissipation and subject to a constant transverse magnetic field B 0.The magnetic Reynolds number is assumed to small so that the induced magnetic field is negligible. The velocity of the external flow is u e (x) = ax and the velocity of the stretching surface is u w (x) = cx, where a and c are positive constants, and x is the coordinate measured along the surface. It is also assumed that the temperature of the melting surface and free stream condition is

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 4895 T M and T, where T > T M In addition, the temperature of the solid medium far from the interface is constant and is denoted by T s where T s <T M. The viscous dissipation has assumed to be negligible. Under these assumptions, the governing equations representing flow are as follows: Continuity equation u v 0 x y () Linear momentum equation u u ue u v ue x y x ( ) Angular momentum equation 2 u B 2 y y 2 0 (u e ( ue u) u) K * p. (2) u v x y 2 u (2 ) j y 2 j y. (3) Energy equation T u x T v y T Q u 2 0 2 ( T T ) ( )( ) 2 m (4) y c p y The boundary conditions suggested by the physics of the problem are: u = u w (x) = cx; ω = n u y ; T=T m ; at y= 0 u = u e (x) ax ; ω 0; T T ; at y. (5) and k ( T y ) y=0 = ρ[ λ + c s (T m T 0 )]v(x, 0) here u and v are the velocity component along the x and y axis, respectively. Further, μ is dynamic viscosity, Λ is vortex viscosity, σ is electrical conductivity of the fluid, ρ is fluid density, T is fluid temperature, j is micro inertia density, ω is microrotation, γ is spin gradient viscosity, α is thermal diffusivity, k is the thermal conductivity, λ is the latent heat of the fluid and C s is the heat capacity of solid surface. We note that n is a constant such 0 n. The case when n = 0, is called strong concentration which indicates that no microrotation near the wall. In case n = 0.5, it indicates that the vanishing of anti-symmetric part of the stress tensor and denote weak concentration and case n = is used for the modeling of turbulent boundary layer flows by Yacob et al. [5].

4896 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav γ = (μ + Λ ) j = μ( + K ) j, where K = Λ is the micro polar or material parameter 2 2 μ and j = υ as reference length. The total spin ω reduce to the angular velocity. a 3. PROBLEM SOLUTION Equation (2) (4) can be transform into a set of nonlinear ordinary differential equation by using the following similarity variables: γ = ( μ + Λ 2 ) j = μ ( + K 2 ) j, K = Λ μ, j = υ a, Ψ = (aυ) 2x f(η); ω = xa ( a υ ) 2h(η),.. (6) θ(η) = T T m T T m, η = ( a υ ) 2y The transformed ordinary differential equations are: ( + K)f + ff + f 2 + Kh + B( f ) + K p ( f ) = 0. (7) ( + K ) 2 h + fh f h + K(2h + f ) = 0... (8) θ + Pr(fθ Hθ Ec( + K)f 2 = 0.. (9) The boundary conditions (5) become f (0) = ε, h(0) = n f (0), Prf(0) + Mθ (0) = 0, θ(0) = 0 f ( ), h( ) 0, θ( ). (0) Where primes denote differentiation with respect to η and Pr = υ α is Prandlt number, ε = c is the stretching (ε > o) parameter, M is the dimensionless melting a parameter, B is magnetic parameter, H is heat absorption parameter and Eckert number which are defined as M = 2 C p (T T m ), B = σb 0, H = Q 0, Ec = u e 2 (x) λ+ C s ( T m T s ) aρ aρc p c p (T m T ) () The physical parameter of interest is the skin friction coefficient C f, local Couple stress coefficient C m and the Nusselt number Nu x, which are defined as C f= τw ρu2 e. (2)

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 4897 C m = C w xρu e 2.. (3) Nu x = x q w Λ( T T m )... (4) Where τ w, C w and q w are the surface shear stress, the local couple stress and the surface heat flux respectively, which are given by τ w = ( μ + k )( u y ) y=0. (5) C w = γ( u y ) y=0.. (6) q w = Λ ( u y ) y=0... (7) Hence using (6), we get Re x 2 C f = [ + ( n ) K ]f (0) (8) Re x C m = ( + K 2 ) h (0).. (9) Re x 2 Nu x = θ (0).. (20) Where Re x = u e ( x ) x υ is the local Reynolds number. NUMERICAL SOLUTION To solve transformed equation (7) to (9) with reference to boundary conditions (0) as an initial value problem, the initial boundary conditions of f (0), h (0) and θ (0) are chosen and Runge-Kutta fourth order method is applied to get solution and calculated value of f(η), h(η) and θ(η) at η = η, where η is sufficient large value of η are compared with the given boundary conditions f (η ) =, h( η ) = 0 and θ( η ) =. The missing values of f (0), h (0) and θ (0), for some values of the heat absorption\generation parameter H, magnetic parameter B, melting parameter M, micropolar parameter K, porous medium parameterk p and the stretching parameter ε are adjusted by shooting method, while the Prandtl number Pr = unity is fixed and we take n = 0.5 for weak concentration. We use MATLAB computer programming for different values of step size η and found that there is a negligible, change in the velocity, temperature, local Nusselt number and skin friction coefficient for values of Δη > 0.00. Therefore in

4898 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav present paper we have set step- size η = 0.00. we use following notation for computer programming f(η) = f, f (η) = f 2, f (η) = f 3, h(η) = f 4, h (η) = f 5, θ(η) = f 6 and θ (η) = f 7 then equations (7) to (9) transformed in the following equations f 3 = {f 2 2 f f 3 B ( f 2 ) Kp ( f 2 ) K f 5 }/( + K). (2) f 5 = {f 2 f 4 f f 5 K (2 f 4 + f 3 )}/( + K )... (22) 2 f 7 = { Pr (f f 7 H f 6 Ec ( + K) f 3 2 ) }.. (23) Values of f (0), h (0) and θ (0) for several values of B, H, K and M when ε = 0.5 Table ε B Ec H K p K M f (0) h (0) θ (0) 0.5 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5040 50-0.28224 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3340 0.09776-0.28824 0.5.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.20955 0.03946-0.277824 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.38925 0.379-0.394422 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 2 0.30380 0.078545-0.223824 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.37900 60-0.295224 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 2 0.29780 0.07037-0.27224 0.5 0.2 0 0.2 0.320 0.0836-0.4224 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.35070 0.0955-0.94424 0.5 0 0.2 0.2 0.33070 0.095493-0.300094 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.33790 0.003-0.26664 0.5 0.2 0.2 0 0.37396 0.752-0.28224 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.29000 0.76345-0.28024

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 4899 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In order to get physical insight into the problem, the numerical calculations for the velocity, micro-rotation and temperature profiles for various values of the parameter have been carried out. The effects of the main controlling parameters as they appear in the governing equations are discussed in the current section. In this study, entire numerical calculations have been performed with ε = 0.5, n = 0.5 and Pr = while B, M, K and H are varied over ranges, which are listed in the figure legends. In order to validate the numerical result obtained they are found to be in a good agreement to previously published paper. The velocity profile u is plotted in Figure for different values of the porous medium parameter K p when B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K = and M = figure exhibits that when we increase the porous medium parameter the velocity profile f (η) decereases. Porous media are widely used to insulated a heated body maintain its temperature.figure2 encounter that the effect of magnetic parameter B on velocity profile f (η) when other parameter are Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K P = 0.2, K = and M =.Figure evident that increasing the values of the magnetic parameter B the velocity profile decrease across the boundary layer. It is noted that the temperature profiles decreases very slowly as the magnetic parameter B increase this is encounter that the change in the temperature profile θ(η) is too small therefore thermal boundary layer have a negligible change corresponding to change in magnetic parameter which is shown in Table. It is noted that presence of magnetic field produces Lorentz force which resists the motion of fluid. Figure 3 show that the variation of magnetic parameter it is clear from graph angular velocity h(η) increase with increase of B. From graph we see that there is a point of intersection at η =.6 and after that a rapid fall of angular velocity in well marked in the flow domain0 < η < 5. It is noted that initially increase as magnetic parameter B increase and then after changing behavior for large value of η the value of h(η) decrease with B, thus due to the increase in magnetic parameter B the boundary layer thickness increase. Figure 4 and Figure 5 shows the characteristics of velocity and temperature of fluid decrease with various value of melting parameter M. Figure 4 shows effect of melting parameter M on velocity profile when B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, H = 0.2, K P = 0.2, and K =. The graphs show that velocity profile decreases as melting parameter increases and similar effect arises in temperature profile as increase the melting parameter the temperature profile decreases this is represented in Figure 5. The effect of micropolar or material parameter K on velocity profile and temperature profile is presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7 respectively when B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K p = 0.2, M = and K takes various value K = 0,, 2. It is evident that velocity profile decrease as K increase, but there is slightly decrease in temperature profile of fluid as increasing the value of micropolar parameter K. Figure 8 reveals that the effect of Eckert number which shows small increment in temperature profile θ(η) due to increasing the value of Eckert number. The effect of Eckert number on velocity

4900 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav profilef (η) is too small so taken negligible which given by Table.Viscuos dissipation produces heat due to drag between the fluid particles therefore this leads to increase in fluid temperature which is exhibits by figure 8. The effects of heat absorption parameter H on velocity profile and temperature profile is represented in Figure 9 and Figure 0 respectively. From Figure 9 we have find that the velocity profile increase as the heat absorption parameter H increase while the reverse effect is observed by Figure when heat generation parameter increase then velocity profile decrease. Again Figure 0 and Figure 2 represent the effect of heat absorption/generation on temperature profile where as temperature profile decrease when heat absorption parameter increase on other hand when heat generation parameter increase then temperature profile is also increase these result can be explained by the fact that heat absorption parameter is sink and heat generation parameter is source which is evident by Figure 0 and Figure 2. Finally From Figure to Figure 2 it can be easily seen that far field boundary condition () are satisfied asymptotically and it is verifies the accuracy of numerical method scheme used. 0.95 Figure B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2,K =, M =, = 0.5 0.9 5 f ' ( ) 0.75 0.7 Kp = 0, 0.2, 0.4 5 0.55 0.5 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Velocity profile f ' () for distinct values of Porous Medium Parameter Kp when B =,Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K =, M = and = 0.5

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 490 Figure 2 0.95 0.9 Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5 5 f ' ( ) 0.75 0.7 B= 0,,.5 5 0.55 0.5 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Velocity profile f ' ( ) for distinct value of Magnetic Parameter B when H = 0.2, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M = and = 0.5 0 Figure 3-0.05 H =0.2, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5-0. B = 0,,.5 h'() -0.5-0.2-0.25-0.3 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Angular Velocity profile h'() for distinct value of Magnetic parameter B when H = 0.2, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M = and = 0.5 0.95 Figure 4 B =, Ec =0.2, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, = 0.5 0.9 5 M = 0,, 2 f ' ( ) 0.75 0.7 5 0.55 0.5 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Velocity profile f ' ( ) for distinct value of Melting Parameter M when B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2 and = 0.5

4902 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav Figure5 0.9 0.7 B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, = 0.5 ( ) 0.5 0.4 M = 0,,2 0.3 0.2 0. 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Temperature profile ( ) for distinct values for Melting Parameter M when B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2 and = 0.5 0.95 0.9 Figure 6 B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, Kp= 0.2, M =, = 0.5 5 f ' ( ) 0.75 0.7 K = 0,, 2 5 0.55 0.5 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Velocity profile f'() for distinct values of Micropolar Parameter K when B =, Ec = 0.2, H= 0.2, Kp = 0.2, M = and = 0.5 Figure 7 0.9 0.7 B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5 ( ) 0.5 0.4 K = 0,, 2 0.3 0.2 0. 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Temperature profile ( ) for distnct values of Micropolar Parameter K when B =, Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M = and = 0.5

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 4903 Figure 8 0.9 0.7 B =, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5 ( ) 0.5 0.4 0.3 Ec = 0, 0.2, 0.4 0.2 0. 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Temperature profile ( ) for distinct values of Eckert Number Ec when B =,Ec = 0.2, H = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M= and = 0.5 Figure 9 0.95 0.9 H = 0, 0.2, 0.4 B =, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5 5 f ' ( ) 0.75 0.7 5 0.55 0.5 0 2 3 4 5 6 Velocity profile f ' ( ) for distinct values Heat Absorption Parameter H when B =, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M = and = 0.5 0.9 Figure 0 ( ) 0.7 0.5 B =, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 H = 0, 0.2, 0.4 0. 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Temperature profile ( ) for distinct values of Heat Absorption Parameter H when B =, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M = and = 0.5

4904 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav Figure 0.95 0.9 B =, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5 5 f ' ( ) 0.75 0.7 H = 0, 0.2, 0.3 5 0.55 0.5 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Velocity profile f ' ( ) for distinct values of Heat generation parameter when B =, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5.6 Figure 2.4 B =, Ec = 0.2, K =, Kp = 0.2, M =, = 0.5.2 ( ) H = 0, 0.2, 0.3 0.4 0.2 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Teperature profile ( ) for distinct values of Heat generation parameter H when B =, Ec = 0.2,K =, Kp = 0.2, M = and = 0.5 CONCLUSION In this paper we have studied the effects of the porous medium parameter, micropolar or material parameter, heat absorption/generation parameter and melting parameter on Nusselt number which is represented the heat transfer rate at the surface and skin friction coefficient for steady laminar boundary layer stagnation point flow and heat transfer from a warm micropolar fluid to a melting solid surface of the same material. Governing equation transformed into a system of coupled non-linear ordinary differential equation by using similarity transform and using Runge-Kutta method of fourth order with shooting technique. It is observed that due to porous medium, melting parameter, magnetic parameter and micropolar parameter and heat generation parameter skin friction coefficient decreases while heat absorption parameter skin

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 4905 friction coefficient increases. Heat transfer coefficient decrease with melting parameter, magnetic parameter, micropolar parameter or material parameter and heat absorption method while increases with heat generation parameter. REFERENCES. A. C. Eringen, Simple micropolar fluids. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2, 205-27(964).. A. C. Eringen, Theory of micropolar fluids. J. Math. Mech 6, -8(966) 2. A. C. Eringen, Theory of thermomicrofluids. J. Math Anal Appl. 38, 480-496(972) 3. Das K. Slip effects o MHD mixed convection Free convection boundary layer flow of a micropolar fluid from a vertical flat plate. IMAJ. Appl. Math., 6, 79-97(998). 4. M. A. El-Hakiem, A. A. Mohammadein, S. M. M. El-Kabeir, and R. S. R. Gorla, Joule heating effects on magnetohydrodynamic free convection flow of a micropolar fluid. Int. Comm. Heat Mass Tran. 26(2), 29-227(999). 5. Gamal M, Rahman A, Studying effect of MHD on thin films of a micropolar fluid, Physica B. 404, 3859-3566(2009). 6. Hiremath, P.S. and Patil, P.M. (993): Free convection effects on oscillatory flow of couple stress field through a porous medium. Acta Mech. 98, 43-58. 7. Raptis A. and Takhar, H. S. (999): Polar fluid through a porous medium, Acta Mechanica 35, 9 93. 8. Sharma, B. K., Chaudhary, R. C. and Sharma, P. K. (2007): Fluctuating mass transfer on three-dimensional flow through a porous medium with variable permeability. Advances in Theoretical and Applied Mathematics. Vol. 2(3), 257-267. 9. Nadeem S., Hussain M. MHD stagnation flow of a micropolar fluid through a porous medium. Meccanica 45, 869-880(200). 0. Ishak A., Nazar R., Pop I. Heat transfer over a stretching surface with variable heat flux in micropolar fluid. Phy Lett A 372, 559-56(2008).. Wang CY, Stagnation flow toward a shrinking sheet. Int J Non- linear Mech, 43,377-382 (2008). 2. Lukaszewicz G. Micropolar fluid: theory and application. Basel: Birkhauser ; (999). 3. Tien C., Yen YC. The effect of melting on forced convection heat transfer, J Appl Meteorol 4, 523-527(965)..

4906 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav 4. R. S. R. Gorla, A. Mohammedan A., M. Mansour, and I. Hussein, Unsteady natural convection from a heated vertical plate in micropolar fluid, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A 28, 253 262 (995). 5. Epstein M., Cho DH. Melting heat transfer in steady laminar flow over a flat plate. J Heat Transfer 98, 53-527(976). 6. Ishak A, Nazar R, Bachok N, Pop I, Melting heat transfer in steady laminar flow over a moving surface. Heat Mass Transfer 46, 463-468(200). 7. Rasoli H, Ishak A, Pop I, Micropolar fluid flow towards stretching/shrinking sheet in a porous medium with suction Int Commun Heat Mass transfer 39, 826-829(202). 8. Y. J. Kim, Unsteady convection flow of micropolar fluids past a vertical plate embedded in a porous medium. Acta. Mech. 48, 05-6(200). 9. Y. J. Kim, Heat and mass transfer in MHD micropolar flow over a vertical moving plate in a porous medium. Trans. Porous Media, 56, 7-37(2004). 20. Y. J. Kim and J. C. Lee, Analytical studies on MHD oscillatory flow of a micropolar fluid over a vertical porous plate, Surface and Coatings Technology 7, 87 93 (2003). 2. Yacob NA, Ishak A, Pop I, Melting heat transfer in boundary layer stagnation-point flow towards a stretching/shrinking sheet in a micropolar fluid. Comput Fluid 47, 6-2(20). 22. Cheng WT, Lin CH, Transient mixed convective heat transfer with melting effect from vertical plate in a liquid saturated porous medium. Int J Eng Sci. 44, 023-036(2006). 23. Das K. Radition and melting effects on MHD boundary layer flow over a moving surface. Ain Shams Eng J. 5, 207-24(204). 24. Sharma B, Singh A, Yadav K, Chaudhary R. Effects of chemical reaction on magneto-micropolar fluid flow from a radiative surface with variable permeability. International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 8(3), 833-85 (203). 25. Cortell R, Fluid flow and radiative nonlinear heat transfer over a stretching sheet. J King University Sci. 26, 6-67 (204). 26. Mahmoud MAA, Washeed SE. MHD flow and heat transfer of a micropolar fluid over a stretching surface with heat generation (absorption) and slip velocity. J Egypt Math soci. 2, 20-27(204).

Stagnation Point Flow of MHD Micropolar Fluid in the Presence of Melting 4907 27. Battaller RC. Effect of heat source/sink, radition and work done by deformation on flow and heat transfer of a viscoelastic fluid over a stretching sheet. Comput math Appl. 53, 305-36 (2007) 28. Ravikumar V, Raju MC, Raju GSS, Combined effects of heat absorption and MHD on convective Rivlin-Ericksen flow past a semi- infinite vertical porous plate with variable temperature and suction. Ain Shams Eng J. 8, 88-24(204) 29. Khan WA, Makinde OD. MHD nanofluid bioconvection due to gyrotactic microorganisms over a convectively heat stretching sheet. Int J Therm Sci. 8, 8-24(204). 30. Khan WA, Culham JR, Makinde OD. Combined heat and mass transfer of third-grade nanofluids over a convectively-heated stretching permeable surface. Can J Chem Eng 93(0), 880-888(205). 3. Akbar NS, Khan ZH, Haq RU, Nadeem S. Dual solutions in MHD stagnationpoint flow of a Prandtl fluid impinging on a shrinking sheet. Appl Math Mech 35(7), 83-820(204). 32. Akbar NS, Ebaid A, Khan ZH. Numerical analysis of magnetic field on Eyring Powell fluid flow towards a stretching sheet. J Magn Magn Mater 382, 355-358(205). 33. Ahmed MS, Mohamed AE. Effect of Hall currents and chemical reaction on hydro magnetic flow of a stretching vertical surface. Appl Math Model 32, 236-254(2008). 34. Singh k., Kumar M. Melting heat transfer in boundary layer stagnation point flow of MHD micropolar fluid towards a stretching/shrinking surface. Jordan J Mech Indus Engg. 8,403-408(204) 35. Singh K., Kumar M. Melting and heat absorption effects in boundary layer stagnation point flow towards a stretching sheet in a micropolar fluid. Ain Shams Engg. J 206

4908 Dr. Mamta Goyal, Mr. Vikas Tailor & Dr. Rajendra Yadav