Experimental Correlation of an N-Dimensional Load Transducer by Finite Element Analysis. Tim Hunter, Ph.D., P.E. Wolf Star Technologies, LLC

Similar documents
Operating Deflection Shapes from Strain Measurement Data

Implementation of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multi-Layer Soils

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF A WESTFALL 2800 MIXER, BETA = 0.8 GFS R1. By Kimbal A. Hall, PE. Submitted to: WESTFALL MANUFACTURING COMPANY

MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3

Nonlinear Modeling for Health Care Applications Ashutosh Srivastava Marc Horner, Ph.D. ANSYS, Inc.

A concrete cylinder having a a diameter of of in. mm and elasticity. Stress and Strain: Stress and Strain: 0.

Stress-Strain Behavior

This guide is made for non-experienced FEA users. It provides basic knowledge needed to start your fatigue calculations quickly.

Characterization of Fixture-Workpiece Static Friction

Experiment Five (5) Principal of Stress and Strain

Static and Time Dependent Failure of Fibre Reinforced Elastomeric Components. Salim Mirza Element Materials Technology Hitchin, UK

Check Homework. Reading Quiz Applications Equations of Equilibrium Example Problems Concept Questions Group Problem Solving Attention Quiz

The objective of this experiment is to investigate the behavior of steel specimen under a tensile test and to determine it's properties.

Study of Rotational Column with Plastic Hinge

INGEGNERIA DEI TESSUTI BIOLOGICI:

Using Thermal Boundary Conditions in SOLIDWORKS Simulation to Simulate a Press Fit Connection

COEFFICIENT OF DYNAMIC HORIZONTAL SUBGRADE REACTION OF PILE FOUNDATIONS ON PROBLEMATIC GROUND IN HOKKAIDO Hirofumi Fukushima 1

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS

Section 6-1 Overview. Definition. Definition. Using Area to Find Probability. Area and Probability

Advancing Disc Bearing Specifications AASHTO T-2 Columbus, OH June 24, 2014

On Nonlinear Buckling and Collapse Analysis using Riks Method

Bridge Method. Bridge Method

Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2010 Boston

Phy211: General Physics I Lab page 1 of 5 PCC-Cascade

Flexible Pavement Stress Analysis

COMPLEX STRESS TUTORIAL 4 THEORIES OF FAILURE. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises.

Samantha Ramirez, MSE. Stress. The intensity of the internal force acting on a specific plane (area) passing through a point. F 2

Clamping Force & Concrete Crosstie Bending Behavior Analysis FRA Tie and Fastener BAA - Industry Partners Meeting Incline Village, NV 7 October 2013

Vibration based Fatigue Damage Assessment of Cantilever Beams

Non-Linear Finite Element Modeling of THUNDER Piezoelectric Actuators

MONITORING TRAFFIC LOADING FOR OPTIMIZED ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGES

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF COMPOSITE PIN- JOINTS AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION

Finite Element Modeling of a Thermoplastic Seal at High Temperature and Pressure

Alternative speckle photography techniques for plastic deformation investigation

Presented by: Sergio G. Arias, Ph. D. Simulia Community Conference 2012, Providence, RI Date: May 16, 2012

Steps: A Windows to the Universe Citizen Science Event. October 1-15, 2007

2 nd European 4PB Workshop University of Minho, Guimarães September 2009

Nonlinear Elastic Analysis of Structural Frame Under Dynamic Load Condition

Laboratory 7 Measurement on Strain & Force. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, San Diego MAE170

2008 International ANSYS Conference

BioMechanics and BioMaterials Lab (BME 541) Experiment #5 Mechanical Prosperities of Biomaterials Tensile Test

Consequently, retrofit of many poor existing structures is a very important issue. for Turkey!

FAA Research on Runway Intersection Grading Criteria

The MidTerm Next Weak Until the end of Discrete Probability Distribution (Ch 5)

MECh300H Introduction to Finite Element Methods. Finite Element Analysis (F.E.A.) of 1-D Problems

Experiment Two (2) Torsional testing of Circular Shafts

Analysis of local stress concentration at transitions

Difference Between Fixed and Floating Reference Points AASHTO T-321

Influence of bond-slip on the behaviour of reinforced concrete beam to column joints

6th NDT in Progress Lamb waves in an anisotropic plate of a single crystal silicon wafer

STATIC EQUILIBRIUM. Purpose

Today is Thursday, February 11 th, 2016

1. The horizontal beam represented in Examination Figure 6 carries three loads P 1. and R 2

Kinectrics North America Inc. Report No.: K RC-0001-R00 March 20, C.J. Pon, Z. Peter Transmission and Distribution Technologies Business

INVESTIGATION OF STRESSES IN MASTER LEAF OF LEAF SPRING BY FEM AND ITS EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION

Measurement. New Topics accuracy vs. precision rounding in chemistry significant figures determining uncertainty of a measurement % error moles - 1 -

Vibration Testing of Small Satellites

Energy. This provides a practical measure of the usefulness of a machine. The useful energy transfer in a generator can be represented by:

Correlation: basic properties.

New Cushion Curve Method

A Repeated Dynamic Impact Analysis for 7x7 Spacer Grids by using ABAQUS/ Standard and Explicit

Nanomotion Precision Piezo Ceramic Motors

AC : ENGINEERING SQUEEZEOMETER AND HUGGOME- TER

Blunt Impact Damage Formation on Composite Aircraft Structures

STRAIN. Normal Strain: The elongation or contractions of a line segment per unit length is referred to as normal strain denoted by Greek symbol.

Using the MSC/Nastran Superelement Modal Method to Improve the Accuracy of Predictive Fatigue Loads of a Short and Long Arm Type Rear Suspension

Friction Problems Solution Strategy. Ambar K. Mitra

2010 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. 11 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary

Comparison of Ply-wise Stress-Strain results for graphite/epoxy laminated plate subjected to in-plane normal loads using CLT and ANSYS ACP PrepPost

Mechatronics II Laboratory EXPERIMENT #1: FORCE AND TORQUE SENSORS DC Motor Characteristics Dynamometer, Part I

Material Characterization of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Laminate Using Virtual Fields Method

Dynamic Characterization Results. Table of Contents. I. Introduction

The Introduction of Pro-EMFATIC For Femap

Pressure Display Controller

Now we are going to use our free body analysis to look at Beam Bending (W3L1) Problems 17, F2002Q1, F2003Q1c

Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) Analysis of Gas and Liquid Flow Through a Modular Sample System

LHC Collimators for Phase 1

DESIGN OF A FREE MOTION HEADFORM IMPACTOR SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR SCHOOL BUS AND MOTOR COACH TESTING. Thesis

The Design of Polyurethane Parts: Using Closed Solutions and Finite Element Analysis to Obtain Optimal Results

Mechanics of materials is one of the first application-based engineering

PREDICTION OF FAILURE BEHAVIOUR OF COMPOSITE LATTICE STRUCTURE UNDER COMPRESSIVE LOAD

ENGI 1313 Mechanics I

Hardened Concrete. Lecture No. 16

INTERNAL STRAIN MEASUREMENTS IN CFRP PLATES SUBJECTED TO IMPACT LOAD USING FBG SENSORS

Task 1 - Material Testing of Bionax Pipe and Joints

Today is Tuesday, February 13 th, 2018

Use of reciprocity calibrated accelerometer standards for performing routine laboratory comparison calibrations. Technical paper 226

The Relationship between the Applied Torque and Stresses in Post-Tension Structures

THE STRESSES AND STRAINS EVALUATIONS IN THE HOT WATER BOILERS PARTS

Mod 1: Pt 2: Scientific Notation

A fatigue limit diagram for plastic rail clips

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design Fall 2007

Orion MPCV E-STA Structural Dynamics Correlation for NASA NESC Andrew Doan, Brent Erickson, Trevor Owen Quartus Engineering

Probability & Statistics: Introduction. Robert Leishman Mark Colton ME 363 Spring 2011

An Acoustic Emission Approach to Assess Remaining Useful Life of Aging Structures under Fatigue Loading PI: Mohammad Modarres

CHAPTER 6 FRICTION AND WEAR ANALYSIS FOR BUSHING

Reactions in the Body Subjected to Coplanar Non- Concurrent Forces Validation using Ansys 10.0

Application Note AN37. Noise Histogram Analysis. by John Lis

Linear Magnetostrictive Models in Comsol

Transducer Design and Modeling 42 nd Annual UIA Symposium Orlando Florida Jay Sheehan JFS Engineering. 4/23/2013 JFS Engineering

Transcription:

Experimental Correlation of an N-Dimensional Load Transducer by Finite Element Analysis Tim Hunter, Ph.D., P.E. Wolf Star Technologies, LLC - or - Getting analysis to match test

What are the loads?

Linear Systems and Loads In other words F = K x εc = F

Back to the Blackboard

A closer look [m x n] [n x m] [m x m] [ε1,1 ε1,2 ε1,3 ε1,4 1,1 C 1,2 C 1,3 C ε 2,1 ε 2,2 ε 2,3 ε 2,1 C 2,2 C 2,3 2,4 C ε 3,1 ε 3,2 ε 3,3 ε 3,1 C 3,2 C 3,3 3,4][C C 4,1 C 4,2 C 4,3]= [F 1 0 0 0 F 2 0 0 0 F 3] Strain locations gauges m = # of load cases (e.g. 3) n = # of gauges (e.g. 4) n m

A closer look Strain signature due to load case 1 turned on [ε1,1 ε1,2 ε1,3 ε1,4 1,1 C 1,2 C 1,3 C ε 2,1 ε 2,2 ε 2,3 ε 2,1 C 2,2 C 2,3 2,4 C ε 3,1 ε 3,2 ε 3,3 ε 3,1 C 3,2 C 3,3 3,4][C C 4,1 C 4,2 C 4,3]= [F 1 0 0 0 F 2 0 0 0 F 3] Strain locations gauges

A closer look Strain signature due to load case 2 turned on [ε1,1 ε1,2 ε1,3 ε1,4 1,1 C 1,2 C 1,3 C ε 2,1 ε 2,2 ε 2,3 ε 2,1 C 2,2 C 2,3 2,4 C ε 3,1 ε 3,2 ε 3,3 ε 3,1 C 3,2 C 3,3 3,4][C C 4,1 C 4,2 C 4,3]= [F 1 0 0 0 F 2 0 0 0 F 3] Strain locations gauges

A closer look Strain signature due to load case 3 turned on [ε1,1 ε1,2 ε1,3 ε1,4 1,1 C 1,2 C 1,3 C ε 2,1 ε 2,2 ε 2,3 ε 2,1 C 2,2 C 2,3 2,4 C ε 3,1 ε 3,2 ε 3,3 ε 3,1 C 3,2 C 3,3 3,4][C C 4,1 C 4,2 C 4,3]= [F 1 0 0 0 F 2 0 0 0 F 3] Strain locations gauges

The Big Unknown From εc= F How do we find C? Let F = I, then εc= I Perform a psuedo-inverse εc= I ε T εc= ε T I [ε T ε] 1 [ε T ε]c= [ε T ε] 1 ε T I C= [ε T ε] 1 ε T

The Big Unknown From εc= F How do we find C? Let F = I, then εc= I Perform a psuedo-inverse εc= I ε T εc= ε T I [ε T ε] 1 [ε T ε]c= [ε T ε] 1 ε T I C= [ε T ε] 1 ε T

The Big Unknown From εc= F How do we find C? Let F = I, then εc= I Perform a psuedo-inverse εc= I ε T εc= ε T I [ε T ε] 1 [ε T ε]c= [ε T ε] 1 ε T I C= [ε T ε] 1 ε T

The Big Unknown From εc= F How do we find C? Let F = I, then εc= I Perform a psuedo-inverse εc= I ε T εc= ε T I [ε T ε] 1 [ε T ε]c= [ε T ε] 1 ε T I C= [ε T ε] 1 ε T

The Big Unknown From εc= F How do we find C? Let F = I, then εc= I Perform a psuedo-inverse εc= I ε T εc= ε T I [ε T ε] 1 [ε T ε]c= [ε T ε] 1 ε T I C= [ε T ε] 1 ε T Can be derived from FEA model

Seeing [C] An extremely large number of strain locations and orientations exist. Which ones are best? C= [ε T ε] 1 ε T The optimal strains locations are found when ε T ε max Search is done via a Galil-Kiefer D-Optimal search algorithm

Hangman Structure

Static Test Setup 16

Procedure 1. Clamp fixture in vise in varying orientations (6) 2. Load fixture with various static load magnitudes (4) and collect strain data (increase load in steps: 5 10.2 15.4 25.2 lbs) 3. Perform preliminary static load strain correlation between test and analysis at all gauge locations 4. Manipulate strain data to reduce point count 5. Use strain data in WST/True Load Post-Test to predict loads 6. Compare predicted loads to known loads 7. Compare replicated strain time histories to measured time histories 17

Static Load Application Load was applied with shot bags weighing 5, 5.2, 5.2, 9.8 lbs (in that order) Load was applied in 6 directions (see below) Lateral Longitudinal Vertical 18

Static Load Application cont. 45 o 60 o 45 o Lat/Long 45 o Lat/Vert 60 o Long/Vert 45 o 19

Data Manipulation 0 lbs 5 lbs 10.2 lbs 15.4 lbs 25.2 lbs 0 lbs Data Extraction & Decimation (using Glyhworks) Reduction from 60,000 to 150 datapoints 20

Post-Test GUI Load Pre-Test Setup Load strain data Create report & load scales 21

Lateral Static Load Load Factors should be: Lateral = 1 Longitudinal = 0 Vertical = 0 22

Lateral Static Load G1: 2.8% Error G2: 0.3% Error G3: 5.2% Error G4: 3.7% Error G5: 0.2% Error G6: 5.6% Error Note: very noisy, < 20 23

Longitudinal Static Load Load Factors should be: Lateral = 0 Longitudinal = 1 Vertical = 0 24

Longitudinal Static Load G2: 15.7% Error G3: 2.1% Error G1: 9.6% Error G4: 0.3% Error G5: 7.2% Error G6: 0.1% Error Note: very noisy, < 20 25

Vertical Static Load Load Factors should be: Lateral = 0 Longitudinal = 0 Vertical = 1 26

Vertical Static Load G3: 11.2% Error G1: 0.0% Error G2: 0.3% Error G4: 1.6% Error G6: 2.4% Error G5: 0.3% Error Note: very noisy, < 20 27

Lat/Long 45 degrees Load Factors should be: Lateral = 0.707 Longitudinal = 0.707 Vertical = 0 28

Lat/Long 45 degrees G1: 4.7% Error G2: 0.3% Error G3: 0.8% Error G4: 0.0% Error G5: 0.2% Error G6: 0.1% Error Note: very noisy, < 20 29

Lat/Vert 60 degrees Load Factors should be: Lateral = 0.866 Longitudinal = 0 Vertical = -0.5 30

Lat/Vert 60 degrees G1: 0.4% Error G2: 0.3% Error G3: 15.8% Error G4: 3.8% Error G5: 0.2% Error G6: 11.2% Error Note: very noisy, < 20 31

Long/Vert 45 degrees Load Factors should be: Lateral = 0 Longitudinal = 0.707 Vertical = -0.707 32

Long/Vert 45 degrees G1: 0.3% Error G2: 0.9% Error G3: 2.6% Error G4: 0.3% Error G5: 0.7% Error G6: 0.1% Error Note: good strain replication on all gauges great correlation 33

Static Load Summary Predicted Theoretical Lateral Long. Vert. 25.2 lb Load Application Direction Lat/Long Lat/Vert Long/Vert 45 o 60 o 45 o Lateral 1.068 1 0.073 0 0.006 0 0.809 0.707 0.937 0.866 0.047 0 Load Scale Factor Long. Vertical 0.004-0.006 0 0 1.019 0.040 1 0 0.026 1.039 0 1 0.714 0.024 0.707 0-0.526 0.005-0.5 0 0.751-0.717 0.707-0.707 Magnitude 1.068 1 1.022 1 1.039 1 1.079 1 1.075 1 1.039 1 Angle b/w ideal and predicted 0.39 o 4.67 o 1.47 o 3.79 o 0.74 o 2.91 o Angle calculated as: 1 AB cos AB 34

Static Load % Error < 5% 5% - 10% > 10% Lateral Long. Vert. Load Application Direction Lat/Long Lat/Vert Long/Vert 45 o 60 o 45 o Lateral 6.8 7.3 0.6 14.4 9.0 4.7 Load Scale Factor Error (%) Long. 0.4 1.9 2.6 1.0 5.2 6.2 Vertical 0.6 0.4 3.9 2.4 0.5 1.4 Magnitude 6.8 2.2 3.9 7.9 7.5 3.9 Mag. Angle Offset (degrees) 0.39 o 4.67 o 1.47 o 3.79 o 0.74 o 2.91 o 35

Proving Ground Loads

Proving Ground Vert Long Lat

Force Correlation Measured Force F= m ẍ Test strains From FEA Force from strain gauges

Strain Correlation

Come visit us at the Safe Technology booth

Special thanks to Mark Fischer Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc

Questions?