Cosmic-Ray Isotopic Identification with the Geomagnetic Field for Space Experiments.

Similar documents
The USINE propagation code and recent results from an MCMC analysis

Precision measurements of nuclear CR energy spectra and composition with the AMS-02 experiment

Current and Future balloon and space experiments L. Derome (LPSC Grenoble) Tango, May 4-6th, 2009

Evidence of Stochastic Acceleration of Secondary. Antiprotons by Supernova Remnants! Ilias Cholis, 08/09/2017

Questions 1pc = 3 ly = km

W.R. Webber. New Mexico State University, Astronomy Department, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

Cosmic Ray Physics with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

Topics. 1. Towards a unified picture of CRs production and propagation: 2. AMS-02 good candidates for Dark Matter space search

PAMELA satellite: fragmentation in the instrument

Dark Matter Searches with AMS-02. AMS: Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer

a cosmic- ray propagation and gamma-ray code

Justin Vandenbroucke (KIPAC, Stanford / SLAC) for the Fermi LAT collaboration

Geomagnetic cutoff simulations for low-energy cosmic rays

Lecture 1. Introduction to Nuclear Science

The PAMELA Satellite Experiment: An Observatory in Space for Particles, Antiparticles and Nuclei in the Cosmic Rays

Primary Cosmic Rays : what are we learning from AMS

Galactic cosmic rays propagation

Searches for astrophysical sources of neutrinos using cascade events in IceCube

New results from the AMS experiment on the International Space Station. Henning Gast RWTH Aachen

Lecture 14: Solar Cycle. Observations of the Solar Cycle. Babcock-Leighton Model. Outline

Searching for signatures of nearby sources of Cosmic rays in their local chemical composition

Solar Energetic Particles measured by AMS-02

Galactic cosmic nuclei and leptons with USINE

The Large Area Telescope on-board of the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission

Cosmic Ray panorama. Pamela.roma2.infn.it PAMELA (2012) Experimental challenges : e + /p ~ 10-3 e + /e - ~ 10-1

Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays: A Tale of Two Observatories

PHY 142! Assignment 11! Summer 2018

Measurements of Heavy Nuclei with the CALET Experiment

Lesson 1. Introduction to Nuclear Science

1. New Mexico State University, Department of Astronomy, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

The Cosmic Ray Boron/Carbon Ratio Measured at Voyager and at AMS-2 from 10 MeV/nuc up to ~1 TeV/nuc and a Comparison With Propagation Calculations

Experimental studies of East-West effect of the charge ratio of atmospheric muons with energies relevant to the atmospheric neutrino anomaly

AMS-02 measurement of cosmic ray positrons and electrons

Gamma-ray emission at the base of the Fermi bubbles. Dmitry Malyshev, Laura Herold Erlangen Center for Astroparticle Physics

New Calculation of Cosmic-Ray Antiproton and Positron Flux

Antiproton Flux and Antiproton-to-Proton Flux Ratio in Primary Cosmic Rays Measured with AMS on the Space Station

Geomagnetic cutoff calculations for the interpretation of low-rigidity cosmic-ray antiparticle measurements

Cosmic rays in the local interstellar medium

DARK MATTER SEARCHES WITH AMS-02 EXPERIMENT

Neutron Interactions Part I. Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics Y2.5321

PHY326/426 Dark Matter and the Universe. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev F9b, Tel.:

Introduction to Cosmic Rays Data Analysis Issues. Nicola De Simone INFN and University of Rome Tor Vergata

3.5. Accelerator Mass Spectroscopy -AMS -

Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter. Steve Ahlen Boston University

Limits on Antiprotons in Space from the Shadowing of Cosmic Rays by the Moon

UHE Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos with the Pierre Auger Observatory

The Pierre Auger Observatory and ultra-high energy neutrinos: upper limits to the diffuse and point source fluxes

A Time-dependent and Anisotropic Force Field Model For Galactic Cosmic Ray Flux

Cosmic rays. 1.1 Origin and nature of cosmic rays

A model of the Earth's gamma-ray emission for GLAST derived from EGRET data. Dirk Petry (UMBC, NASA/GSFC) DC2 Meeting GSFC June 27-29, 2005

Interaction of Particles with Matter

Preliminary results from gamma-ray observations with the CALorimeteric Electron Telescope (CALET)

Subir Sarkar

99 Years from Discovery : What is our current picture on Cosmic Rays? #6 How cosmic rays travel to Earth? Presented by Nahee Park

Galactic Cosmic Ray Propagation in the AMS 02 Era

Compton Scattering I. 1 Introduction

Cosmic rays and the diffuse gamma-ray emission

Particle Production Measurements at Fermilab

Lecture 9 - Applications of 4 vectors, and some examples

,RD-R14i 134 SURVEY OF ATMOSPHERIC RDIATION COMPONENTS FOR THE i/i GAMMA AND COSMIC RAY A..(U) SEVERNCCOMMUNICRTIONS CORP SEVERNA PARK MD 15 FEB 84

Fluxes of Galactic Cosmic Rays

Experimental Constraints to high energy hadronic interaction models using the Pierre Auger Observatory part-i

Measurement of CR anisotropies with the AMS detector on the ISS

Monthly Proton Flux. Solar modulation with AMS. Veronica Bindi, AMS Collaboration

PoS(ICRC2017)1076. Studies of Cosmic-Ray Proton Flux with the DAMPE Experiment

Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments. A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics

Gamma ray and antiparticles (e + and p) as tools to study the propagation of cosmic rays in the Galaxy

Recent results from MICE on multiple Coulomb scattering and energy loss

THE UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA

Particle Detectors A brief introduction with emphasis on high energy physics applications

THE AMS RICH COUNTER

Cosmic Rays. Discovered in 1912 by Viktor Hess using electroscopes to measure ionization at altitudes via balloon

Antimatter and DM search in space with AMS Introduction. 2 Cosmology with Cosmic Rays

Chapter 2 Radiation-Matter Interactions

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 3 Feb 2014

Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter

- ~200 times heavier than the e GeV µ travels on average. - does not interact strongly. - does emit bremsstrahlung in

Radiative Processes in Flares I: Bremsstrahlung

Theoretical Assessment of Aircrew Exposure to Galactic Cosmic Radiation Using the FLUKA Monte Carlo Code

Rapid determination of cutoff rigidities and asymptotic directions using predetermined data from a database

Cosmic Antimatter. Stéphane. Coutu The Pennsylvania State University. 3 rd. Astrophysics Arequipa,, Peru August 28-29, 29, 2008

all been measured to an accuracy of a few percent between 600 MeV nucleon and 20 GeV nucleon~1 on the HEAO3

Galactic cosmic rays phenomenology: nuclei, antimatter, dark matter

Neutrino Flavor Ratios Modified by Cosmic Ray Secondary- acceleration

Selected Topics in Physics a lecture course for 1st year students by W.B. von Schlippe Spring Semester 2007

Measurements in Interstellar Space of Galactic Cosmic Ray Isotopes of. Li, Be, B and N, Ne Nuclei Between MeV/nuc by the

Low-Energy Cosmic Rays

arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 23 Jun 2016

Properties of Elementary Particle Fluxes in Cosmic Rays. TeVPA Aug. 7, Yuan-Hann Chang National Central University, Taiwan

Neutron pulse height analysis (R405n)

Chapter 5: The First Law of Thermodynamics: Closed Systems

W.R. Webber. New Mexico State University, Astronomy Department, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA

SIMULATION OF THE GAMMA-RAY GALACTIC DISTRIBUTION AS SEEN BY THE AMS-02

Strict constrains on cosmic ray propagation and abundances. Aaron Vincent IPPP Durham

The AMS-02 Anticoincidence Counter

Interactions of particles and radiation with matter

Cosmic Pevatrons in the Galaxy

OVERVIEW OF THE RESULTS

Acceleration Mechanisms Part I

Decays and Scattering. Decay Rates Cross Sections Calculating Decays Scattering Lifetime of Particles

Transcription:

ICRC 11 - Beijing 11-18 August 11 Cosmic-Ray Isotopic Identification with the Geomagnetic Field for Space Experiments. W. GILLARD, F. BARAO, L. DEROME

L The cosmic-ray diffusion: A two zone diffusion model N t = Q(r, p )+ Source D xx N VN Spatial diffusion Galactic Wind : Convection + p p D pp p 1 p N p ṗn p 3 V N N τ f N τ 1/ Energetic diffusion Reacceleration Energy losses Lost by Fragmentation Lost by decay Secondary stable nuclei : -Dxx Ns +hδ(z) nυσs Ns = hδ(z) nυσps Np Solution : N s () = N p() nυσ ps + nυσ s D xx hl Secondary-to-Primary ratio Maurin et al., ApJ 555, 596 (1), A&A 394, 139 () Maurin et al., Apj 555, 585 (1) N s N p = D xx hl nυσ ps + nυσ s BUT L and Dxx are degenerated : The uncertainties on L do not permit to constrains the diffusion coeficient Dxx=βDR δ D/L

The cosmic-ray diffusion: A two zone diffusion model N t = Q(r, p )+ Source D xx N VN Spatial diffusion Galactic Wind : Convection + p p D pp p 1 p N p ṗn p 3 V N N τ f N τ 1/ Energetic diffusion Reacceleration Energy losses Lost by Fragmentation Lost by decay Secondary Unstable-to-primary ratio N β N p = nυσ pβ D xx h τ + nυσ β The diffusion of secondary unstable nuclei is independent of the hallo size (assuming Dτ << L ). The Unstable nuclei are important to constrain diffusion models

Identifying Cosmic-Ray Isotopes Classical method to identify isotopes rely on their mass estimation : To identify isotopes on an event by event bassis, mass measurement precision (σ) should be at most 3σ < ΔM, with ΔM the difference in isotop masses Table of required resolution to perform isotopic identification Isotopes D/H 3 He/ 4 He 1 Be/ 9 Be 6 Al/ 7 Al ΔM/M % 8 % 3 % 1 % From combined measurement of velocity & rigidity: Independent measurement of the particle momentum (or rigidity) and velocity allow to estimate the mass of the incoming particle and subsequently to identify isotopes. Mc = ZR γβ σm M = σp p γ σβ β For a reliable mass estimation, both, particle momentum and velocity, must be measured with a great precision.

Identifying Cosmic-Ray Isotopes From their energy losses in matter : de dx = K A Z z β 1 ln m ec γ β T max I CR Energy losses in the PAMELA tracker plan - With the courtesy of the PAMELA collaboration β δ(γβ)

Identifying Cosmic-Ray Isotopes From their energy losses in matter : de dx K A Z z p c + M c 4 p c CR Energy losses in the PAMELA tracker plan - With the courtesy of the PAMELA collaboration When Mc is comparable to pc, the energy losses measurement permit to estimate the particle masses and separate isotopes. When Mc << pc, the energy losses turn out to be independent of the masses. Energy losses largely spread arround the average energy losses Possible missidentification

The Geomagnetic Filter : Principle Use of the Earth Geomagnetic field as an isotopic filter : How does it work? R < Rc R > Rc Geomagnetic field shields Earth against charged particles. R c = M B r R = mc γβ Ze cos 4 B 1+ 1 cos 3 B sin θ B sin φ B, Rigidity cutoff translate to a velocity threshold : β c = RZe mc 1 RZe mc +1

The Geomagnetic Filter : Principle Use of the Earth Geomagnetic field as an isotopic filter : How does it work? m1 ; β1 βc m > m1 ; β1 β Geomagnetic field shields Earth against charged particles. R c = M B r R = mc γβ Ze cos 4 B 1+ 1 cos 3 B sin θ B sin φ B, Rigidity cutoff translate to a velocity threshold : β c = RZe 1 mc RZe mc +1 At equal velocity, heavier isotope penetrates deaper. The use of the Geomagnetic field as purpose to identify isotopes was first proposed by Balassubramayan et al. (1936) et Hubert (1974).

The Geomagnetic Filter : Example with 1 Be, 9 Be, 7 Be 1. 1 Rigidity [GV] 1 Depending on the value of β, their is three possible case :.8.6 I) β > βc( 7 Be) II) βc( 7 Be) > β > βc( 9 Be) III) βc( 9 Be) > β > βc( 1 Be) β c.4 β c ( 7 Be). β c ( 9 Be) β c ( 1 Be) 3 4 5 6 7 Geomagnetic Latitude [ ] Velocity threshold, calculated for normal incident particle under the Stoermer approximation assuming a dipolar geomagnetic field.

The Geomagnetic Filter : Example with 1 Be, 9 Be, 7 Be 1. 1 Rigidity [GV] 1 Depending on the value of β, their is three possible case :.8.6 I) β > βc( 7 Be) II) βc( 7 Be) > β > βc( 9 Be) III) βc( 9 Be) > β > βc( 1 Be) β c.4 β c ( 7 Be). β c ( 9 Be) β c ( 1 Be) 3 4 5 6 7 Geomagnetic Latitude [ ] Velocity threshold, calculated for normal incident particle under the Stoermer approximation assuming a dipolar geomagnetic field. All isotopes are above the geomagnetic cutoff : One can not distinguish isotopes Velocity distribution expected to be measured at different latitudes Velocity distribution (Arb. Unit) B = 5º B = 55º B = 65.7º ➓+➒+➐.4.6.8 β ➓+➒ +➐ ➓+➒+➐

The Geomagnetic Filter : Example with 1 Be, 9 Be, 7 Be 1. 1 Rigidity [GV] 1 Depending on the value of β, their is three possible case :.8.6 I) β > βc( 7 Be) II) βc( 7 Be) > β > βc( 9 Be) III) βc( 9 Be) > β > βc( 1 Be) β c.4 β c ( 7 Be). β c ( 9 Be) β c ( 1 Be) 3 4 5 6 7 Geomagnetic Latitude [ ] Velocity threshold, calculated for normal incident particle under the Stoermer approximation assuming a dipolar geomagnetic field. 7 Be is bellow the geomagnetic cutoff : Incoming Isotopes is either a 9 Be or 1 Be Velocity distribution expected to be measured at different latitudes Velocity distribution (Arb. Unit) B = 5º B = 55º B = 65.7º ➓ ➒ ➓+ ➒ ➓ ➒.4.6.8 β

The Geomagnetic Filter : Example with 1 Be, 9 Be, 7 Be 1. 1 Rigidity [GV] 1 Depending on the value of β, their is three possible case :.8.6 I) β > βc( 7 Be) II) βc( 7 Be) > β > βc( 9 Be) III) βc( 9 Be) > β > βc( 1 Be) β c.4 β c ( 7 Be). β c ( 9 Be) β c ( 1 Be) 3 4 5 6 7 Geomagnetic Latitude [ ] Velocity threshold, calculated for normal incident particle under the Stoermer approximation assuming a dipolar geomagnetic field. 7 Be and 9 Be are bellow the geomagnetic cutoff : Incoming Isotopes is a 1 Be Velocity distribution expected to be measured at different latitudes Velocity distribution (Arb. Unit) B = 5º B = 55º B = 65.7º.4.6.8 β

The Geomagnetic Filter : Example with 1 Be, 9 Be, 7 Be β c 1..8.6.4 1 Rigidity [GV] 1 Δβ β c ( 7 Be). β c ( 9 Be) β c ( 1 Be) 3 4 5 6 7 Geomagnetic Latitude [ ] Velocity threshold, calculated for normal incident particle under the Stoermer approximation assuming a dipolar geomagnetic field. Only a small fraction of Isotope can be identified. Depending on the value of β, their is three possible case : I) β > βc( 7 Be) II) βc( 7 Be) > β > βc( 9 Be) III) βc( 9 Be) > β > βc( 1 Be) Velocity distribution (Arb. Unit) B = 5º B = 55º B = 65.7º Δβ.4.6.8 β

The Geomagnetic Filter : Flux reconstruction The number of event in each bin of energy ΔN = ΔE ε D ε B ε f dt εd = Acc ε Detection efficiency εb Cutoff efficiency εf Geomagnetic filter efficiency I) β > βc( 7 Be) II) βc( 7 Be) > β > βc( 9 Be) III) βc( 9 Be) > β > βc( 1 Be) Estimation of the flux : I(E) ; II(E) ; III(E) The flux for each isotopes can be reconstructed using : Φ 1Be (E) = Φ III (E) Φ 9Be (E) = Φ II (E) - Φ III (E) Φ 7Be (E) = Φ I (E) - Φ II (E) Selection Efficiency 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 Geomagnetic filter efficiency estimated for space experiment with 6º orbit inclination. Geomagnetic field was modeled with the IGRF model. I) β > βc(7be) II) βc(7be) > β > βc(9be) III) βc(9be) > β > βc(1be) 1 1 1 Kinetic energy [GeV/nuc]

Conclusion We presented a method using the Geomagnetic field shielding property to filter isotopes from cosmic radiation. The method was presented under the dipolar and Stoermer approximations. Method based on a realistic Geomagnetic filed, accounting for the penumbra is under study. Method is well adapted to space born experiment which explore region of different geomagnetic cutoff 5% to 1% of the 1 Be could be identified up to an energy of 1 GeV/n. This method only rely on the velocity measurment of incoming nuclei Δβ c 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 6 Geomagnetique Latitude [ ] 5 4 β c ( 1 H)-β c ( H) β c ( 3 He)-β c ( 4 He) β c ( 7 Be)-β c ( 9 Be) β c ( 9 Be)-β c ( 1 Be) PAMELA-ToF AMS-RICH 3 AMS-ToF β c ( 13 C)-β c ( 14 C) β c ( 6 Al)-β c ( 7 Al) β c ( 36 Cl)-β c ( 37 Cl) β c ( 54 Mn)-β c ( 55 Mn) 1 1 Rigidity [GV]

Side Slides

The cosmic-ray diffusion: A two zone diffusion model N t = Q(r, p )+ Source D xx N VN Spatial diffusion Galactic Wind : Convection + p p D pp p 1 p N p ṗn p 3 V N N τ f N τ 1/ Energetic diffusion Reacceleration Energy losses Lost by Fragmentation The thin disk model : A simplified geometry - Thin gas disk (h) - Thin source disk (h) - Thick diffusion hallo (L>>h) Steady state assumption - N/ t = Plain diffusion - No convection : V = - No reacceleration : D pp = - Neglect energy losses Lost by decay

The cosmic-ray diffusion: A two zone diffusion model N t = Q(r, p )+ Source D xx N VN Spatial diffusion Galactic Wind : Convection + p p D pp p 1 p N p ṗn p 3 D xx hl D xx hl V N N τ f N τ 1/ Energetic diffusion Reacceleration Energy losses Lost by Fragmentation Primary stable nuclei : -Dxx Np +hδ(z) nυσp Np = hδ(z) Q Solution : Q() N p () = + nυσ p Secondary stable nuclei : -Dxx Ns +hδ(z) nυσs Ns = hδ(z) nυσps Np Solution : N s () = N p() nυσ ps + nυσ s Secondary-to-Primary ratio Lost by decay N s N p = D xx hl nυσ ps + nυσ s

The cosmic-ray diffusion: Secondary-to-primary ratio Secondary-to-primary flux ratio (e.g. B/C) constrains diffusion parameters L, Dxx, Vc, VA. Maurin et al., ApJ 555, 596 (1) A&A 394, 139 () L BUT L and Dxx are degenerated : Maurin et al., Apj 555, 585 (1) The uncertainties on L do not permit to constrains the diffusion parameters Dxx=βDR δ D /L

The cosmic-ray diffusion: Secondary unstable-to-primary ratio N t = Q(r, p )+ Source D xx N VN Spatial diffusion Galactic Wind : Convection + p p D pp p 1 p N p ṗn p 3 V N N τ f N τ 1/ Energetic diffusion Reacceleration Energy losses Lost by Fragmentation Secondary unstable nuclei : Lost by decay -Dxx Nβ +hδ(z) nυσ Nβ +Nβ/τ 1/ = hδ(z) nυσ Np Solution : N β () = N p() nυσ pβ D xx h τ + nυσ β Secondary Unstable-to-primary ratio N β N p = nυσ pβ D xx h τ + nυσ β The diffusion of secondary unstable nuclei is independent of the hallo size (assuming Dτ << L ).

Identifying Cosmic-Ray Isotopes From combined measurement of velocity & rigidity: Independent measurement of the particle momentum (or rigidity) and velocity allow to estimate the mass of the incoming particle and subsequently to identify isotopes. Mc = ZR γβ For a reliable mass estimation, both, particle momentum and velocity, must be measured with a great precision. σm M = σp p γ σβ β

Geomagnetic field Interne : modélisé par IGRF App. Dipolaire Stable dans le temps Externe : modélisé par Ts4 Déformé par la pression du vent solaire Dominant pour R > RT Très variable.

Geomagnetic field

Geomagnetic field

Geomagnetic field Rc Rc The penumbre structure is differents depending on the geomagnetic field models and it turn out to be more and more complicates at high geomagnetic latitude.