A NOTE ON CES FUNCTIONS Drago Bergholt, BI Norwegian Business School 2011

Similar documents
Economics 101. Lecture 4 - Equilibrium and Efficiency

Welfare Properties of General Equilibrium. What can be said about optimality properties of resource allocation implied by general equilibrium?

1 The Sidrauski model

Let p z be the price of z and p 1 and p 2 be the prices of the goods making up y. In general there is no problem in grouping goods.

,, MRTS is the marginal rate of technical substitution

k t+1 + c t A t k t, t=0

Economics 2450A: Public Economics Section 10: Education Policies and Simpler Theory of Capital Taxation

Economics 8105 Macroeconomic Theory Recitation 1

University of California, Davis Date: June 22, 2009 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D.

PROBLEM SET 7 GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM

Lecture Notes, January 11, 2010

Test code: ME I/ME II, 2007

Mixed Taxation and Production Efficiency

CS294 Topics in Algorithmic Game Theory October 11, Lecture 7

Difference Equations

6) Derivatives, gradients and Hessian matrices

Copyright (C) 2008 David K. Levine This document is an open textbook; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the Creative

f(x,y) = (4(x 2 4)x,2y) = 0 H(x,y) =

1. relation between exp. function and IUF

Perfect Competition and the Nash Bargaining Solution

ACTM State Calculus Competition Saturday April 30, 2011

Problem Set 3. 1 Offshoring as a Rybzcynski Effect. Economics 245 Fall 2011 International Trade

Supporting Materials for: Two Monetary Models with Alternating Markets

princeton univ. F 17 cos 521: Advanced Algorithm Design Lecture 7: LP Duality Lecturer: Matt Weinberg

Supporting Information for: Two Monetary Models with Alternating Markets

x i1 =1 for all i (the constant ).

Equilibrium with Complete Markets. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Section 3.6 Complex Zeros

Lecture 19. Endogenous Regressors and Instrumental Variables

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

How Strong Are Weak Patents? Joseph Farrell and Carl Shapiro. Supplementary Material Licensing Probabilistic Patents to Cournot Oligopolists *

Math1110 (Spring 2009) Prelim 3 - Solutions

ANSWERS. Problem 1. and the moment generating function (mgf) by. defined for any real t. Use this to show that E( U) var( U)

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS. MODULE IX Lecture Multicollinearity

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

CSci 6974 and ECSE 6966 Math. Tech. for Vision, Graphics and Robotics Lecture 21, April 17, 2006 Estimating A Plane Homography

Idiosyncratic Investment (or Entrepreneurial) Risk in a Neoclassical Growth Model. George-Marios Angeletos. MIT and NBER

Assortment Optimization under MNL

NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION

Production Function Estimation

Foundations of Arithmetic

Limited Dependent Variables

Errors for Linear Systems

The Second Anti-Mathima on Game Theory

In the figure below, the point d indicates the location of the consumer that is under competition. Transportation costs are given by td.

Winter 2008 CS567 Stochastic Linear/Integer Programming Guest Lecturer: Xu, Huan

CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE

CGE Models. Eduardo Haddad

International Macroeconomics #4 Pricing to market

= z 20 z n. (k 20) + 4 z k = 4

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

( ) 2 ( ) ( ) Problem Set 4 Suggested Solutions. Problem 1

The internal structure of natural numbers and one method for the definition of large prime numbers

Kernel Methods and SVMs Extension

The Multiple Classical Linear Regression Model (CLRM): Specification and Assumptions. 1. Introduction

Differentiating Gaussian Processes

20. Mon, Oct. 13 What we have done so far corresponds roughly to Chapters 2 & 3 of Lee. Now we turn to Chapter 4. The first idea is connectedness.

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS Page 1 of The idea of a frequency distribution for sets of observations will be introduced,

CGE Models. Eduardo Haddad

Notes on Kehoe Perri, Econometrica 2002

Structure and Drive Paul A. Jensen Copyright July 20, 2003

Credit Card Pricing and Impact of Adverse Selection

For now, let us focus on a specific model of neurons. These are simplified from reality but can achieve remarkable results.

1 Derivation of Rate Equations from Single-Cell Conductance (Hodgkin-Huxley-like) Equations

APPROXIMATE PRICES OF BASKET AND ASIAN OPTIONS DUPONT OLIVIER. Premia 14

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

Uniqueness of Nash Equilibrium in Private Provision of Public Goods: Extension. Nobuo Akai *

Midterm Examination. Regression and Forecasting Models

A Cournot-Stackelberg Advertising Duopoly Derived From A Cobb-Douglas Utility Function

Implicit Integration Henyey Method

Chapter 2 - The Simple Linear Regression Model S =0. e i is a random error. S β2 β. This is a minimization problem. Solution is a calculus exercise.

Dummy variables in multiple variable regression model

Lecture 17 : Stochastic Processes II

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

Price competition with capacity constraints. Consumers are rationed at the low-price firm. But who are the rationed ones?

UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. M.Sc. in Economics MICROECONOMIC THEORY I. Problem Set II

Lecture 10 Support Vector Machines II

COS 521: Advanced Algorithms Game Theory and Linear Programming

Topic 5: Non-Linear Regression

Mechanics Physics 151

Theory Appendix for Market Penetration Costs and the New Consumers Margin in International Trade

MAE140 - Linear Circuits - Winter 16 Midterm, February 5

1 Convex Optimization

Physics 4B. A positive value is obtained, so the current is counterclockwise around the circuit.

CIS526: Machine Learning Lecture 3 (Sept 16, 2003) Linear Regression. Preparation help: Xiaoying Huang. x 1 θ 1 output... θ M x M

Agriculture and aggregation

The Granular Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations : Supplementary Material

Additional Codes using Finite Difference Method. 1 HJB Equation for Consumption-Saving Problem Without Uncertainty

The Feynman path integral

THE ARIMOTO-BLAHUT ALGORITHM FOR COMPUTATION OF CHANNEL CAPACITY. William A. Pearlman. References: S. Arimoto - IEEE Trans. Inform. Thy., Jan.

THE CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM. We should thank the Chinese for their wonderful remainder theorem. Glenn Stevens

Hila Etzion. Min-Seok Pang

8.1 Arc Length. What is the length of a curve? How can we approximate it? We could do it following the pattern we ve used before

U.C. Berkeley CS294: Beyond Worst-Case Analysis Luca Trevisan September 5, 2017

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

Preference and Demand Examples

Online Appendix. t=1 (p t w)q t. Then the first order condition shows that

LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS. MODULE IX Lecture Multicollinearity

Module 2. Random Processes. Version 2 ECE IIT, Kharagpur

Generalized Linear Methods

Transcription:

A NOTE ON CES FUNCTIONS Drago Bergholt, BI Norwegan Busness School 2011 Functons featurng constant elastcty of substtuton CES are wdely used n appled economcs and fnance. In ths note, I do two thngs. Frst, I derve a number of condtons such as the optmal demand schedule when aggregaton technology s CES. Second, I show how the CES functon nests some partcular functonal forms as specal cases. Consder a general CES functon: 1 PRELIMINARIES Y = A J α 1 1 Y =1 1, 1 where A, > 0, α, Y > 0, and =1 α = 1. In models wth monopolstc competton between frms, Y s nterpreted as aggregate output and {Y } J =1 as output by ntermedate frms. In turn, the producton technology of frms can also have a CES structure, wth each Y beng referred to as an nput factor such as labor or captal or land. Y can also be aggregate demand or consumpton, a composte of ndvdual consumer classes or goods. In open economy macroeconomcs, one uses the CES structure to dstngush between domestcally produced goods and mports. The scalng parameter A s often normalzed to 1, but n the context of producton theory, t s typcally nterpreted as a measure of total factor productvty whch can be stochastc n a tme seres context. 2 IMPLICATIONS OF CES TECHNOLOGY What are the mplcatons of assumng a CES technology for aggregaton n economc models? To shed lght on ths queston, we start wth a maxmzaton problem. The problem s to choose the vector {Y } J =1 that maxmzes Y subect to some budget constrant P Y Z, 2 =1 where Z s total money spent. Let us state the Lagrangan where Λ s the multpler for the constrant: J 1 J L = A Λ P Y Z α 1 1 Y =1 =1 The necessary frst order condton s A 1 1 Y J, so we can wrte 1 α Y 1 = ΛP. Ths must hold for all Y = α α P P 1 Y, 3

2.1 A NATURAL PRICE INDEX Next, we derve an exact prce ndex for a unt ncrease n Y. Plug 3 nto the budget constrant and solve for Y : Z = Y = =1 P Y = Y P α Zα P =1 α P 1 Insert ths result nto Y now wth ndexng : =1 α P 1 Y = A α 1 1 1 Y =1 J = A = AZ = AZ =1 J =1 J =1 α 1 Zα P =1 α P 1 1 α P 1 α P 1 1 1 =1 1 α P 1 1 1 Fnally, defne P as the expendture needed to buy one unt of Y,.e. P Z Y =1. From the expresson above, t naturally follows that P = 1 A Thus, P s the natural prce ndex for Y. J =1 α P 1 1 1. 4 2.2 THE BUDGET CONSTRAINT REVISITED Next, note that nsertng 3 nto 2 gves Z = = P Y =1 =1 P α α P P Y = P Y Y = α P P A 1 P 1 α Z A 1 P. 5 2

Substtute nto 1 and solve for Z. The result s Y = A α 1 P α P =1 Z A 1 P 1 Thus, Z = P Y, and we can wrte the budget constrant as P Y = P Y. =1 1 = ZP 1. 2.3 THE OPTIMAL DEMAND SCHEDULE Fnally, substtuton of Z = P Y nto 5 whch holds, J gves the optmal demand for Y : P Y Y = α 6 P A 1 One can also get rd of A and end up wth Y = α P J =1 α P 1 1 1 α 1 1 Y =1 1. Thus, optmal demand for Y n 6 s not determned by A, but rather by the prce P relatve to all other prces, as well as by total factor demand. Equaton 6 s wdely used as demand functon n theoretcal models of optmzng economc behavor. 2.4 ELASTICITIES To understand why the functonal form n 1 exhbts CES between any par Y, Y, we defne the elastcty of substtuton as the percentage rse n Y Y followng a one percent rse n the relatve prce P P. It s clear from 3 that Y Y = α P, α P so we can wrte By dvdng by Y Y / P Y Y P P = α P α P 1. P, a constant elastcty of substtuton emerges: Elastcty of substtuton Y Y Y / = P P P / P Y Elastcty of ncome Y /Y Z/Z = α α P 1 α P α P 1 α P α P What about the ncome elastcty? Earler we defned Z as the ncome spent on Y. The ncome elastcty follows from 5: P 1 P A 1 P 3 P 1 A 1 P = 1 =

3 SPECIAL CASES OF THE CES FUNCTION Next, we show how the CES functon nests as specal cases some partcular functonal forms. Before we start, t s useful to note that equaton 1 s equvalent to Y = A J =1 α Ỹ γ 1 γ, 7 where Ỹ Y α and γ 1. Our task s to fnd an expresson for Y when or γ 1 lnear, 1 or γ 0 Cobb-Douglas, and 0 or γ Leontef. For reasons that wll be clear below, t s convenent to work wth a log transformaton of equaton 7: ln Y = ln A + 1 γ ln J =1 α Ỹ γ = ln A + F γ G γ, 8 J where F γ ln =1 α Ỹ γ and G γ γ. Fnally, n order to derve the Cobb- Douglas and Leontef functons we need L Hôptal s rule: The L Hôptal s rule: Consder two functons F γ and G γ, whch are dfferentable on an nterval a, b, except possbly at a pont c a, b. Suppose lm γ c F γ = lm γ c G γ = 0 or ±, lm γ c F γ G γ exsts, and G γ 0 γ c a, b. Then F γ lm γ c G γ = lm F γ γ c G γ. In our case the frst dervatves are F γ = F γ G γ = =1 α Ỹ γ lnỹ =1 α Ỹ γ and G γ = 1, mplyng J =1 α Ỹ γ Ỹ ln =1 α. 9 Ỹ γ Next, we consder each of the three specal cases of the CES functon. 3.1 THE LINEAR CASE γ 1 Ths one s trval as t follows mmedately from equaton 7 that lm Y = A Y. 10 γ 1 =1 4

3.2 THE COBB-DOUGLAS CASE γ 0 Here we want to evaluate equaton 8 when γ 0. However, the result s J ln =1 α Ỹ γ 0 lm ln Y = ln A + lm = ln A +. γ 0 γ 0 γ 0 The last term holds as long as =1 α = 1. 1 To proceed, we apply L Hôptal s rule. Evaluatng equaton 9 n the lmt as γ 0, we can wrte 8 as or lm ln Y = ln A + lm γ 0 γ 0 = ln A + = ln A J =1 =1 Ỹ α =1 α Ỹ γ ln Ỹ =1 α Ỹ γ α ln Ỹ lm Y = A 1 γ 0 J =1 αα, J =1 Y α. 11 Ths s the wdely used Cobb-Douglas functon. The scalng parameter A s often normalzed so that A J 1 =1 αα = 1. 3.3 THE LEONTIEF CASE γ When γ, then equaton 8 becomes J ln =1 α Ỹ γ lm ln Y = ln A + lm γ γ γ Agan, usng L Hôptal s rule, we can wrte Ỹ m mn {Ỹ1,..., ỸJ lm ln Y = ln A + lm γ γ = ln A + =1 α Ỹ γ ln Ỹ =1 α Ỹ γ lnỹ =1 α Ỹ γ.. =1 However, a new problem arses because lm α Ỹ γ γ = 0 0, whch cannot be solved by multple } uses of L Hôptal s rule. 2 In order to proceed, we defne. Dvdng the nomnator and denomnator by Ỹ m, γ we get lm ln Y = ln A + lm γ γ =1 α Ỹ Ỹ m γ ln Ỹ =1 α Ỹ 1 If nstead =1 α > 1 < 1, then the last term goes to as γ 0. wll always show up both n the nomnator and n the denomnator. 2 Ỹ γ 5 Ỹ m γ

= ln A + ln = ln mn {Ỹ1,..., ỸJ }, A mn {Ỹ1,..., ỸJ } or { lm Y = A mn Y1,..., Y } J. 12 γ α 1 α J Ths s the Leontef functon. 3.4 FROM ISOELASTIC UTILITY TO LOG UTILITY Consder the soelastc utlty functon U = C1 σ 1 1 σ, wth C > 0. Apparently a 0 0 -ssue arses when one evaluates U as σ 1. In that case one can defne F σ C 1 σ 1 and G σ 1 σ. Because F σ = C 1 σ ln C and G σ = 1, we get lm U = lm F σ σ 1 σ 1 G σ = ln C. 13 6