Aircraft Design I Tail loads

Similar documents
Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics

Mechanics of Flight. Warren F. Phillips. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Utah State University WILEY

Stability and Control Some Characteristics of Lifting Surfaces, and Pitch-Moments

Introduction to Flight Dynamics

Aircraft Performance, Stability and control with experiments in Flight. Questions

Flight Dynamics and Control. Lecture 3: Longitudinal stability Derivatives G. Dimitriadis University of Liege

April 15, 2011 Sample Quiz and Exam Questions D. A. Caughey Page 1 of 9

PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT

AE Stability and Control of Aerospace Vehicles

Extended longitudinal stability theory at low Re - Application to sailplane models

SPECIAL CONDITION. Water Load Conditions. SPECIAL CONDITION Water Load Conditions

A SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS AND CONCEPTUAL CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN

Rotor reference axis

( ) (where v = pr ) v V

Design, Analysis and Research Corporation (DARcorporation) ERRATA: Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls Part I

Chapter 5 Performance analysis I Steady level flight (Lectures 17 to 20) Keywords: Steady level flight equations of motion, minimum power required,

4-7. Elementary aeroelasticity

/ m U) β - r dr/dt=(n β / C) β+ (N r /C) r [8+8] (c) Effective angle of attack. [4+6+6]

FLIGHT DYNAMICS. Robert F. Stengel. Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford

Air Loads. Airfoil Geometry. Upper surface. Lower surface

Design, Analysis and Research Corporation (DARcorporation) ERRATA: Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls Part I

Consider a wing of finite span with an elliptic circulation distribution:

Flight Dynamics and Control

Virtual Work & Energy Methods. External Energy-Work Transformation

Experimental Aircraft Parameter Estimation

Aircraft stability and control Prof: A. K. Ghosh Dept of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

Aircraft Flight Dynamics & Vortex Lattice Codes

Alternative Expressions for the Velocity Vector Velocity restricted to the vertical plane. Longitudinal Equations of Motion

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

FREQUENCY DOMAIN FLUTTER ANALYSIS OF AIRCRAFT WING IN SUBSONIC FLOW

Figure 3.71 example of spanwise loading due to aileron deflection.

Study. Aerodynamics. Small UAV. AVL Software

Flight Dynamics, Simulation, and Control

Aero-Propulsive-Elastic Modeling Using OpenVSP

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Cambridge, MA 02139

Airplane Icing. Accidents That Shaped Our Safety Regulations. Federal Aviation Administration

Use of Compliant Hinges to Tailor Flight Dynamics of Unmanned Aircraft

13.4 to "wutter' Substituting these values in Eq. (13.57) we obtain

MODELING OF SPIN MODES OF SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT IN HORIZONTAL WIND TUNNEL

Lecture No. # 09. (Refer Slide Time: 01:00)

MODIFICATION OF AERODYNAMIC WING LOADS BY FLUIDIC DEVICES

DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, IIT MADRAS M.Tech. Curriculum

Chapter 1 Lecture 2. Introduction 2. Topics. Chapter-1

Contribution of Airplane design parameters on Roll Coupling اي داءالبارامترات التصميميه للطائره على ازدواج الحركي

Aircraft Structures Design Example

Airfoils and Wings. Eugene M. Cliff

Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics

Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics

MAV Unsteady Characteristics in-flight Measurement with the Help of SmartAP Autopilot

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING

Aeroelastic Gust Response

What is flight dynamics? AE540: Flight Dynamics and Control I. What is flight control? Is the study of aircraft motion and its characteristics.

Trim 2D. Holly Lewis University of Colorado Center for Aerospace Structures April 29, 2004

AIAA Sensing Aircraft Effects by Flap Hinge Moment Measurement

Study on Numerical Simulation Method of Gust Response in Time Domain Jun-Li WANG

Stability and Control

Nonlinear Aerodynamic Predictions Of Aircraft and Missiles Employing Trailing-Edge Flaps

Why Should You Consider a Freezing Point Depressant Ice Protection System? Icing Certification Present and Future. CAV Aerospace Limited

GyroRotor program : user manual

Aerodynamics SYST 460/560. George Mason University Fall 2008 CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH. Copyright Lance Sherry (2008)

AA 242B/ ME 242B: Mechanical Vibrations (Spring 2016)

Lecture #AC 3. Aircraft Lateral Dynamics. Spiral, Roll, and Dutch Roll Modes

Theory of Flight Flight Instruments and Performance Factors References: FTGU pages 32-34, 39-45

CHAPTER 1. Introduction

Numerical Study on Performance of Innovative Wind Turbine Blade for Load Reduction

Theory of Flight. Pitot Static Instruments Flight Instruments and Performance Factors. MTPs:

Fault-Tolerant Control of a Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Partial Wing Loss

TAKEOFF CONSIDERATIONS...

Chapter 9. Nonlinear Design Models. Beard & McLain, Small Unmanned Aircraft, Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 9, Slide 1

Simulation of Non-Linear Flight Control Using Backstepping Method

Aim. Unit abstract. Learning outcomes. QCF level: 6 Credit value: 15

Modeling of a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Effect of Moment of Inertia and Aerodynamics Parameters on Aerodynamic Coupling in Roll Mode

RESEARCH MEMORANDUM NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS UNCLASSIFIED AND DIRECTIONAL AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF FOUR

Flight Vehicle Terminology

Chapter 1 Introduction (Lectures 1,2 and 3)

Maneuver of fixed-wing combat aircraft

A model of an aircraft towing a cable-body system

F-35: A case study. Eugene Heim Leifur Thor Leifsson Evan Neblett. AOE 4124 Configuration Aerodynamics Virginia Tech April 2003

MINISTRY O] SUPPLY. AERONAUTICAL RESEARCH COUNCqrL REPORTS AND MEMORANDA. L ~%.,-,SI ~V±S.~ tvd,k,q,.., ~,~ 4 "IVN I±~ ~ Crown Copyrigat Reseewed

Giovanni Tarantino, Dipartimento di Fisica e Tecnologie Relative, Università di Palermo (Italia)

Chapter 2 Lecture 7 Longitudinal stick fixed static stability and control 4 Topics

Stability and Control Analysis in Twin-Boom Vertical Stabilizer Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)

02 Introduction to Structural Dynamics & Aeroelasticity

PART ONE Parameters for Performance Calculations

Aircraft Pitch Control Design Using Observer-State Feedback Control

Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics

The polar for uncambered and cambered airfoils. The angel of attack α

NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT (NPA) 11/2004 DRAFT DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY,

8 The HIRM+ Flight Dynamics Model

AN ENHANCED CORRECTION FACTOR TECHNIQUE FOR AERODYNAMIC INFLUENCE COEFFICIENT METHODS

EVOLVING DOCUMENT ME 5070 Flight Dynamics

Computational Fluid Dynamics Study Of Fluid Flow And Aerodynamic Forces On An Airfoil S.Kandwal 1, Dr. S. Singh 2

Onboard Estimation of Impaired Aircraft Performance Envelope

"In presenting the dissertation as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced, degree from the Georgia Institute f Technology, I agree

9.4 Miscellaneous topics flight limitations, operating envelop and V-n diagram Flight limitations Operating envelop 9.4.

Chapter 4 The Equations of Motion

1. Fluid Dynamics Around Airfoils

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

List of symbols. Latin symbols. Symbol Property Unit

Transcription:

Horizontal tail loads Aircraft Design I Tail loads What is the source of loads? How to compute it? What cases should be taken under consideration? Tail small wing but strongly deflected Linearized pressure distribution on the not deflected airfoil (clean configuration

Assuming unit chord length the we obtain the following formulas to compute p and h p= q(c z 60C m 8 h = q(5c z + 300C m 8 where: q dynamic pressure (0.5 ρ V Linearized pressure distribution on the deflected airfoil If the control surface chord ratio is ϕ=c S /C a and increments of the lift and pitching moment due to control surface deflection are C z and C m the following formulas are obtained: q p= [(4ϕ C z C m ] ϕ q h= ( C z + C m ϕ ( ϕ

Remarks: Values p, p, p 3 are the results of summing of distributions from previous slides: p = ( p+ p + ( h+ h 0.8 ϕ p = 0.8( p+ p + h ϕ p3 =ϕ ( p+ p The loads (forces q, q and their coordinates x, x can be derived from the following relations: q = [ p+ 5 p ( ϕ + p3(4 5ϕ ] 0 q = ϕ p3 x = [ p+ p+ 5(0.8 ϕ ( p+ p3 + 5(0.8 ϕ ( p+ p3 ] 50 q x = ϕ 3 The linearized pressure distribution is not good to compute the hinge moments. The force acting on the control surface is closer than x to rotation axis in fact. However the torque (torsion moment computed in this way is greater only a little and the structure is heavier not much. Load distribution What is the source of the loads? Aerodynamic load of a horizontal tail: q continuous load of a tailplane, q continuous load of an elevator, x, x coordinates of the loads To derive the critical cases to size the horizontal tail, the following sources should be taken into account: loads to satisfy equilibrium, loads due to control, loads due to gusts, nonsymmetrical loads (sideslip, propeller downwash, etc. The analysis of such cases depends on the regulations. Generally, we have to compute: lift coefficient due to angle of attack on the horizontal tail, lift coefficient increment due to elevator deflection, pitching moment coefficient due to angle of attack on the horizontal tail, pitching moment coefficient increment due to elevator deflection, hinge moments

Equilibrium problem Loads to satisfy equilibrium This load of tailplane is required to satisfy equilibrium conditions during straight level flight, with constant airspeed. This load (angle of attack, elevator deflection and lift and pitching moment coefficients have to be computed for all characteristic points of flight envelope V A, V F, V C, i V D. These loads are only initial to compute other cases. The results should be: angle of attack on the tailplane (α H elevator deflection (δ H, lift force coefficient (a α H on the tail due to angle of attack, lift force coefficient increment (a δ H due to elevator deflection, M SC = M Y + P Z x SC P ZH ( x x = H SC 0 Manoeuvring loads Manoeuvring loads are computed according to the following criteria defined in regulations: max. control forces (eg. CS 3.397, max. pitching accelerations (eg. CS 3.43. The result of this part of analysis, should be the max. possible increment of forces and hinge moments (and their dimensionless coefficients due to control, computed for each characteristic point of flight envelope. The increments have to be computed for both (up and down elevator deflection, for each value of airspeed and load factor. Look at CS-5 CS 5.39 Control surface loads: general The control surfaces must be designed for the limit loads resulting from the flight conditions in CS 5.33, CS 5.34(a and (b, CS 5.349 and CS 5.35, considering the requirements for: (a Loads parallel to hinge line, in CS 5.393; (b Pilot effort effects, in CS 5.397; (c Trim tab effects, in CS 5.407; (d Unsymmetrical loads, in CS 5.47; and (e Auxiliary aerodynamic surfaces, in CS 5.445.

CS 5.397 Control system loads (a General. The maximum and minimum pilot forces, specified in subparagraph (c of this paragraph, are assumed to act at the appropriate control grips or pads (in a manner simulating flight conditions and to be reacted at the attachment of the control system to the control surface horn. (b Pilot effort effects. In the control surface flight loading condition, the air loads on movable surfaces and the corresponding deflections need not exceed those that would result in flight from the application of any pilot force within the ranges specified in subparagraph (c of this paragraph. Two thirds of the maximum values specified for the aileron and elevator may be used if control surface hinge moments are based on reliable data. In applying this criterion, the effects of servo mechanisms, tabs, and automatic pilot systems, must be considered. What next in CS-5 Look at CS-3 CS 3.43 Manoeuvring loads (See AMC 3.43 Each horizontal surface and its supporting structure, and the main wing of a canard or tandem wing configuration, if that surface has pitch control, must be designed for manoeuvring loads imposed by the following conditions: (a A sudden movement of the pitching control, at the speed VA to the maximum aft movement, and the maximum forward movement, as limited by the control stops, or pilot effort, whichever is critical. (b A sudden aft movement of the pitching control at speeds above VA, followed by a forward movement of the pitching control resulting in the following combinations of normal and angular acceleration: Look at CS-3 Loads due to gusts

... and what next Unsymmetrical loads we compute: angle of attack on the tailplane (α H elevator deflection (δ H, lift coefficient (a α H on the tailplane due to angle of attack, lift force increment (coefficient (a δ H due to elevator deflection, chordwise distribution spanwise distribution and next as in case of main wing...