Soil Morphology and Stratigraphy on an Erosional Footslope: Dickinson Experiment Station in Western North Dakota

Similar documents
Clay In Loess And Clay Content Of Loessial Soils In Southeastern Nebraska

MINERALOGICAL ALTERATIONS OF SOIL IRRIGATED WITH ACIDIC MINE WATER IN THE ALAMOSA RIVER BASIN

O\.OLSSON \ ASSOC I ATES

3.3 CLIMATE, GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS CLIMATE GEOLOGY TOPOGRAPHY

SOILS RELATIVE TO GEOLOGY AND LANDFORMS IN WALNUT GULCH EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED, ARIZONA, USA. W. R. Osterkamp, D. J. Breckenfeld, and J.J.

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

Chapter 2. Regional Landscapes and the Hydrologic Cycle

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

For Sale at $437,500.00

Soil Formation. Lesson Plan: NRES B2-4

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLIMATIC CONDITIONS AND SOIL PROPERTIES AT SCAN AND SNOTEL SITES IN UTAH. Karen Vaughan 1 and Randy Julander 2 ABSTRACT

Chemical Weathering and Soils

Soil Taxonomy Classification Jackson County, Florida (Chipola River) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007

GIS APPLICATIONS IN SOIL SURVEY UPDATES

Assembling information to develop ecological site and state and transition concepts. Brandon Bestelmeyer, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, NM

The Soils and Land Capability for Agriculture. Land North of Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire

Soil Taxonomy Classification Washington County, Florida (Pine Log 631A)

For Sale - 56 Acre Sandstone Quarry State Route 511, Oberlin/Kipton, OH 44075

A surficial. P^HiHI waste disposal site, Bureau County, Illinois. east of the Sheffield low-level radioactive. electrical resistivity survey

Soil Erosion Calculation using Remote Sensing and GIS in Río Grande de Arecibo Watershed, Puerto Rico

Observations on Surface Water in the Seminary Fen in Spring, Prepared 6/4/13 by Sam Wetterlin; updated 7/28/13

Linking Arid Land Surface Characteristics to Soil Hydrologic and Ecosystem Functions in Mojave Desert Landscapes

Laboratory Exercise #4 Geologic Surface Processes in Dry Lands

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

The questions below refer to Soil Surveys and topographic maps from our field trip.

OBJECTIVES. Fluvial Geomorphology? STREAM CLASSIFICATION & RIVER ASSESSMENT

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Mapping Soils, Crops, and Rangelands by Machine Analysis of Multi-Temporal ERTS-1 Data

Lecture 7: Introduction to Soil Formation and Classification

Unit E: Basic Principles of Soil Science. Lesson 2: Understanding Soil Formation

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Eighth Work Plan, Pond Dynamics Research 1 (PDR1)

2017 NACTA Contest FAQs for 4-Year Universities

Laboratory data for calcic soils in central New Mexico: Background information for mapping Quaternary deposits in the Albuquerque Basin

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Washington

The Little Colorado River

Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hillslope Erosion Rates in the Oak Savannas of the Southwestern Borderlands Region

Soil Taxonomy Classification Osage County, Kansas. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi. Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

1. To appreciate the value of the soil survey as a tool to obtain important information about soils and vegetation in given geographic areas

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

Landslide Computer Modeling Potential

4. Soils and soil conditions

Preliminary soil survey of the NATL Old Field Plots


STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

For Sale at: $136,000.00

12- TOL MLRA Soil Survey Area Approximately 15,000,000 Acres

What Is Water Erosion? Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? What Is Sedimentation? How can Sediment Yields be Minimized?

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Soil Development. Soils Sustain Life

Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Taxonomy Classification Gadsden County, Florida (Imperial Nursery)

Landscapes & Hydric Soils Bruce Vasilas University of Delaware

The effect of soil physical parameters on soil erosion. Introduction. The K-factor

residuum resulting from weathering over an extended period of time has vertical layers called soil profile from surface down to fresh parent material

THE TRANSECTS. Oldenburger,F.H.F. & Norde,R.* Online publication 2009 Correspondence author.

Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

Floodplain modeling. Ovidius University of Constanta (P4) Romania & Technological Educational Institute of Serres, Greece

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

DISTRIBUTION OF METALS IN PARTICLE SIZE FRACTIONS IN SOILS OF TWO FORESTED CATENAS (SMOLENSK MOSCOW UPLAND)

Seismic Expressions of Submarine Channel - Levee Systems and Their Architectural Elements

2012 Growing Season Weather Summary for North Dakota. Adnan Akyüz and Barbara A. Mullins Department of Soil Science October 30, 2012

Ground-Water Exploration in the Worthington Area of Nobles County: Summary of Seismic Data and Recent Test Drilling Results

Clyde River Landslide

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Juan Area, Puerto Rico

Assessment of Ground Water in a Part of Coastal West Bengal using Geo-Electrical Method

Soils of the GLBRC Marginal Land Experiment (MLE) Sites

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi 30 27' 27'' 30 26' 57''

High-resolution Sequence Stratigraphy of the Glauconitic Sandstone, Upper Mannville C Pool, Cessford Field: a Record of Evolving Accommodation

Dams, sediment, and channel changes and why you should care

STAAR Science Tutorial 40 TEK 8.9C: Topographic Maps & Erosional Landforms

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hutchinson County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Big Rivers Electric Corporation Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) from Electric Utilities Final Rule CCR Impoundment Liner Assessment Report

Illinois Drought Update, December 1, 2005 DROUGHT RESPONSE TASK FORCE Illinois State Water Survey, Department of Natural Resources

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION DELFT 3-D MODELING: MODEL DESIGN, SETUP, AND ANALYSIS

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 18, 2017

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

Producing Chandler Walnut Orchard

Custom Soil Resource Report for Okeechobee County, Florida

Supplementary Material

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Santa Fe Area, New Mexico, Santa Fe County and Part of Rio Arriba County; and Santa Fe County Area, New Mexico

Custom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon

FUTURE MEANDER BEND MIGRATION AND FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS NEAR RIVER MILES 241 TO 235, SACRAMENTO RIVER

Geomorphology Of The Chilliwack River Watershed Landform Mapping At North Cascades National Park Service Complex, Washington By National Park Service

Three L Canyon Soil Geomorphic Units

Central North Dakota Shallow Gas Potential A Historical Perspective

Erosion Susceptibility in the area Around the Okanogan Fire Complex, Washington, US

Ecoregions Glossary. 7.8B: Changes To Texas Land Earth and Space

The subject paper is being submitted for approval for publication in the annual volume entitled Geological Survey Research.

Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley By Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D., Southern Oregon University

Hydric Rating by Map Unit Harrison County, Mississippi

Curtis Monger USDA-NRCS Developments in Soil Taxonomy

Transcription:

Soil Morphology and Stratigraphy on an Erosional Footslope: Dickinson Experiment Station in Western North Dakota By D. Claypool, D. G. Hopkins, and J. L. Richardson ABSTRACT A first order soil survey of the crop rotation plots on the Dickinson Agricultural Experiment Station in western North Dakota was made in 1987. The site is on an erosional footslope developed in pedisediments. The soils mostly classified as fine-loamy Typic and Pachic Argiborolls. Pachic soils were observed throughout the study site and their distribution appeared to be independent of landscape position. Bt horizon thickness was independent of elevation as was the depth to carbonates. Five pedons had buried paleosols: two in higher positions and three in lower positions. Our study area is a footslope that is currently stable but the presence of buried soils indicates at least one erosional beveling and pedisediment covering. This was followed by a reintroduction of CaCO 3 in buried Bt horizons. We believe that these are very old soils because both the paleosols and overlying soils are well developed. INTRODUCTION During a first order soil survey of the crop rotation plots on the Dickinson Agricultural Experiment Station, we wanted to obtain additional information on soil-landscape relationships and soil variability (Claypool, 1987). The purpose of the survey was to enhance soil management and provide detailed soil information for interpreting crop production data. The need to identify soil variability for agronomic research in this geographic area was noted earlier (Hopkins et al., 1987). The objectives of this study were to examine the soil taxa observed as parts of a topographic system and evaluate the relationship between topography and selected soil properties. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study area is located in the southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 140N, Range 96W, Stark County, North Dakota (Fig. 1), and occupies about 5 acres (2 ha) of the Dickinson Agricultural Experiment Station. The climate in this area is semiarid and continental with mean annual temperature of 40 degrees F (4.6 degrees C) and mean annual precipitation of 15.5 inches (39 cm). The native vegetation was short and mid grasses (Larson et al., 1968). The site is on an erosional footslope developed in pedisediments from the Sentinel Butte Formation of the Fort Union Group. The Sentinel Butte Formation is characterized by continental sediments, mostly fluvial, with some lignite (Groenewold, 1979). The erosional footslope contains shallow, fine textured Ustorthents above the study area and deep, medium and fine textured Argiborolls in the study area. 10

A topographic map of the crop rotation plots was made on a 25 feet (7.6 m) grid. Thirty-six sampling sites were established in four transects perpendicular to the slope. Soil pedons were described to 40 inches (1 m) using standard procedures from 2.5 inches (7.6 cm) diameter cores (Soil Survey Staff, 1951). RESULTS The study area had a planar surface with a south aspect and an average slope of 5% (Fig. 2). The soils were classified as fine-loamy Typic and Pachic Argiborolls with the exception of one sandy Entic Haploboroll. Pachic soils were observed throughout the study site and their distribution appeared to be independent of landscape position (Fig. 2). Additionally, Bt horizon thickness (Fig. 3, 4, and 5) was independent of elevation as was the depth to carbonates (Fig. 6). The greatest depth to carbonates and thickest Bt horizons were on the east side of the study area and decreased across the slope towards the west. Five pedons had buried paleosols: two in higher positions and three in lower positions. The argillic horizons of the higher paleosols possessed moderately thick clay films, strong grades of structure, and finer textures than the overlying soils. In the lower paleosols the argillic horizons had thin clay films, weak and moderate grades of structure, and coarser textures than the overlying soils. One of the upper paleosols had an intact Ab horizon; all others were truncated or the Ab had disappeared (Fig. 3 and 4). In all cases, pedologic discontinuities and color changes marked the paleosols. DISCUSSION Geomorphic stability is indicated by the presence of well developed argillic horizons in soils throughout the study site. We believe that the formation of thick argillic horizons here requires a stable geomorphic surface. The argillic horizon thickness implies that these soils are very old. Given the simplicity and geomorphic stability of this surface, we expected a straight forward slope-soil morphologic relationship. The soils, however, did not conform to our expectations. Argillic horizon thickness and depth to carbonates progressively became deeper across the slope west to east rather than down the slope. Many of the argillic horizons observed in these pedons were effervescent in acid indicating the presence of carbonates. This represents a change in pedogenic processes. The formation of an argillic horizon usually occurs after CaCO 3 has been removed (Soil Survey Staff, 1975). Therefore, we assume that the carbonates in a Btk horizon were reintroduced after a Bt horizon formed. INTERPRETATIONS Our study area is a footslope that is currently stable but the presence of buried soils indicates at least one erosional beveling and pedisediment covering. This was followed by a reintroduction of CaCO 3 in buried Bt horizons. We believe that these are very old soils because both the paleosols and overlying soils are well developed. The variation in Bt horizon thickness, plus the depth to carbonates are accounted for by differential erosion across the slope. Therefore, it is likely that geomorphic and pedogenic processes have not been uniform because of differential rill and interrill erosion. In older landscapes such as this, we probably should expect a complex geomorphic history. 11

REFERENCES Claypool, David. 1987. Soil Survey of Rotation Plot Site. Dickinson Agricultural Experiment Station 1987 Annual Report. Sec. 4: pp. 2-36. Groenewold, G.H., L.A. Hemish, J.A. Cherry, B.W. Rehm, G.N. Meyer, and L.M. Winczewski. 1979. Geology and Geohydrology of the Knife River Basin and Adjacent Areas of West-central North Dakota. North Dakota Geol. Surv. Rept. of Invest. 64. Grand Forks, ND. Hopkins, D.G., J.L. Richardson, and M.D. Sweeney. 1987a. Composition Comparisons in Sodic Map Unit Delineations on the Dickinson Experiment Station Ranch Headquarters, North Dakota. Soil Surv. Horizons. 28(2) : 46-50. Larson, K.E., A.F. Bahr, W. Freymiller, R. Kukowski, D. Opdahl, H. Stoner, P.K. Weiser, D.D. Patterson, and O. Olson. 1968. Soil Survey of Stark County, North Dakota. USDA-SCS. U.S. Gov t. Printing Office, Washington, DC. Soil Survey Staff, 1951. Soil Survey Manual. USDA Handb. No. 18. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC. Soil Survey Staff, 1975. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Agri. Handbook No. 436, 754 pp. 12

13

14

15

16

17